Identification of unknown impurities J, RRT 2.2, 2.4, 2.6 and 3.4 in tetralysal® capsules.

Tetralysal® is a Galderma oral drug product (DP) marketed for the treatment of acne. Tetralysal® is sold in capsules containing either 150 mg or 300 mg of the drug substance. In the British Pharmacopoeia monograph for Lymecycline Capsules, the impurities already specified in the drug substance (A-G), visible in the European Pharmacopoeia 〈1654〉, are also specified together with an unidentified impurity at RRT 1.6 (Impurity J). Based on both monographs Galderma has focused on characterizing most of specified and unspecified impurities to better understand the stability and degradation processes of the formulation. In this manuscript, through both formal synthesis, preparative LCMS and formal degradation studies, we are the first group to confirm the structural identities of 5 unidentified impurities (Impurity J (RRT 1.6), RRT 2.2, 2.4, 2.6 and 3.4), conditions which exacerbate the formation of all 5 impurities and response factors for RRT 2.2, 2.6 and 3.4.

Comparison between lymecycline with multidrug therapy and standard multidrug regimen (WHO-MDT) in the treatment of multibacillary leprosy patients: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Hansen's disease or leprosy is a chronic, infectious disease that has locally and globally afflicted all populations. Despite standard treatment with multidrug therapy (WHO-MDT), the incidence of drug resistance has been an increasingly prevalent global problem in leprosy management. This study compared the effectiveness between lymecycline with WHO-MDT and standard WHO-MDT in leprosy treatment. METHODS: The research is a retrospective cohort study at a tertiary hospital from January 2011 to July 2021. Pre- and post-treatment bacillary index, presence of new lesions, nerve function impairment, and leprosy reactions were obtained through chart review. RESULTS: The results showed a significant difference in bacteriological index (BI) in both groups at the end of the treatment. However, a higher reduction in BI was noted for the lymecycline group. For the group that took WHO-MDT alone, BI decreased by 0.7 (P < 0.001) whereas patients who took lymecycline and WHO-MDT had a BI difference of 3 (P < 0.001) upon completion of treatment. A significant decrease in the recurrence of lesions (P = 0.006) and nerve function impairment (P = 0.038) was also noted in the lymecycline group whereas there was no significant difference in leprosy reactions between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Lymecycline 600 mg daily for 3 months can be used as an adjunct in cases of leprosy resistance and treatment failure among multibacillary patients. Lymecycline significantly reduced bacillary index, recurrence of skin lesions, and nerve function impairment through its possible immunomodulatory, antiapoptotic, and neuroprotective effects.

Completion of the impurity profile of lymecycline: Formal identification of impurities E and F.

Lymecycline is the drug substance (DS) used in the Galderma drug product Tetralysal® capsules with 7 impurities currently described in the pharmacopeia labelled as A-G. In the current monograph, the structural identity of all impurities except E and F have been formally identified. In this manuscript, through both formal synthesis and preparative chromatography, we are the first group to confirm the structural identity, response factor of Impurity F and conditions which exacerbate the formation of both impurities.

Treatment of hidradenitis suppurativa with tetracycline, doxycycline, or lymecycline: a prospective study.

AIM: To evaluate the clinical efficacy of tetracycline, doxycycline, and lymecycline in patients with hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). METHODS: A prospective study of three different treatment regimens in patients with HS; oral tetracycline 500 mg twice daily, oral doxycycline 100 mg twice daily, and oral lymecycline 300 mg twice daily were administered in patients with HS. Outcomes were change in Hidradenitis Suppurativa Score (HSS), Dermatology Life Quality Life index (DLQI), overall disease-related distress, boil-related pain, number of boils in the preceding month, fraction of patients with no boils in the preceding month, and Physician's Global Assessment (PGA) score at follow-up. RESULTS: In total, 108 patients, 73 (67.6%) women and 35 (32.4%) men, were included. Mean duration of treatment was 4.3 months. The mean HSS at baseline was 26.10 (SD 20.18) points, improving to 17.97 (SD 17.88) at follow-up, difference is 8.13 (95% CI 5.21-10.93), P < 0.0001. Highest improvement in HSS was observed in the tetracycline group. After multivariate adjustment, higher reduction in HSS was significantly associated with lower BMI, Hurley stage III, higher HSS at baseline, and higher number of boils in the preceding month at baseline. CONCLUSION: Oral treatment with tetracycline, doxycycline, and lymecycline appears effective and safe in HS patients. Tetracycline provided the greatest clinical improvement measured by HSS.

Lymecycline vs. clindamycin plus rifampicin in hidradenitis suppurativa treatment: clinical and ultrasonography evaluation.

BACKGROUND: Antibiotic therapy remains the first-line treatment for hidradenitis suppurativa (HS). However, literature data on its comparative clinical efficacy and safety are limited. AIM: To investigate the efficacy of tetracycline (lymecycline 300 mg daily) vs. the combination therapy clindamycin and rifampicin (600 mg plus 600 mg daily) by evaluating and comparing the clinical response at the end of antibiotic treatment (10 weeks). METHODS: The study retrospectively analysed 52 patients divided in two groups of 26 patients: Group A received lymecycline and Group B received clindamycin plus rifampicin for 10 weeks. Subjects had mild, moderate and severe HS. The clinical and ultrasonography extent of disease was measured by the Hurley Score, Sonographic Score of Hidradenitis Suppurativa, International Hidradenitis Suppurativa Severity Score System (IHS4), pain visual analogue scale (pain VAS) and Dermatology Life Quality Index (DLQI). The primary outcome was the clinical response at the end of the antibiotic treatment period, according to the Hidradenitis Suppurativa Clinical Response measure. RESULTS: Both groups showed a significant improvement in IHS4, pain VAS and DLQI from baseline, but this was more marked in Group A. Reductions in nodule counts were similar between the two groups, whereas the number of abscesses and draining tunnels decreased more in Group B. Disease-free survival was similar between the two groups. CONCLUSION: Lymecycline monotherapy and clindamycin plus rifampicin combination are both effective treatments for patients with moderate-severe HS. Nodular-type HS seems to respond better to lymecycline, whereas the abscess/tunnel type seems to respond better to clindamycin plus rifampicin.

Lymecycline reverses acquired EGFR-TKI resistance in non-small-cell lung cancer by targeting GRB2.

Epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitors (EGFR-TKIs) were first-line treatments for NSCLC patients with EGFR-mutations. However, about 30 % of responders relapsed within six months because of acquired resistance. In this study, we used Connectivity Map (CMap) to discover a drug capable of reversing acquired EGFR-TKIs resistance. To investigate Lymecycline's ability to reverse acquired EGFR-TKIs resistance, two Icotinib resistant cell lines were constructed. Lymecycline's ability to suppress the proliferation of Icotinib resistant cells in vitro and in vivo was then evaluated. Molecular targets were predicted using network pharmacology and used to identify the molecular mechanism. Growth factor receptor-bound protein 2 (GRB2) is an EGFR-binding adaptor protein essential for EGFR phosphorylation and regulation of AKT/ERK/STAT3 signaling pathways. Lymecycline targeted GRB2 and inhibited the resistance of the cell cycle to EGFR-TKI, arresting disease progression and inducing apoptosis in cancer cells. Combined Lymecycline and Icotinib treatment produced a synergistic effect and induced apoptosis in HCC827R5 and PC9R10 cells. Cell proliferation in resistant cancer cells was significantly inhibited by the combined Lymecycline and Icotinib treatment in mouse models. Lymecycline inhibited the resistance of the cell cycle to EGFR-TKI and induced apoptosis in NSCLC by inhibiting EGFR phosphorylation and GRB2-mediated AKT/ERK/STAT3 signaling pathways. This provided strong support that Lymecycline when combined with EGFR targeting drugs, enhanced the efficacy of treatments for drug-resistant NSCLC.

Isotretinoin and lymecycline treatments modify the skin microbiota in acne.

Oral retinoids and tetracyclines have a major role in acne treatment. Here, we report for the first time the effect of isotretinoin and lymecycline therapy on the skin microbiota in cheek, back and armpit swab samples of acne vulgaris patients using 16S ribosomal RNA (16S rRNA) gene amplicon sequencing. Propionibacterium acnes was the most common in sebaceous areas of healthy and untreated acne skin and more abundant in back than cheek samples. Five taxa, including a Streptococcus taxon, differed significantly between the cheek samples of healthy controls and acne patients, and acne severity was positively correlated with the abundance of Propionibacterium. Both treatments reduced clinical acne grades and the abundance of Propionibacterium, while the abundance of several other taxa was significantly higher in treated cheek samples compared with untreated ones. Less variation was observed in back samples and none in armpit samples. There were no differences in alpha diversity between control and acne patients in any of the sampled skin areas, but the diversity of the microbiota on the cheek and the back was significantly increased after acne treatments. This study provides insight into the skin microbiota in acne and how it is modulated by systemic acne treatment.

Metformin as an adjunct therapy for the treatment of moderate to severe acne vulgaris.

The purpose of this literature review is to evaluate the use of metformin as an adjunct therapy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne in those not diagnosed with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) or androgen excess. The authors conducted independent literature searches. Results were limited to clinical trials and randomized controlled trials. Studies with participants diagnosed with moderateto-severe acne vulgaris taking metformin versus placebo or other active treatment were included;studies with participants diagnosed with PCOS or androgen excess were excluded. The authors found three studies consistent with the search guidelines that evaluated the effects of metformin as adjunct therapy in moderate to severe acne vulgaris. In eachstudy, metformin was an effective adjunct therapy in the treatment of moderate-to-severe acne vulgaris.

Treatment of Mycobacterium marinum with lymecycline: new therapeutic alternative?

Skin infections by Mycobacterium marinum are quite rare in our environment and, therefore, little studied. The majority of the lesions appear three weeks after traumas in aquariums, beaches and fish tanks. Lymph node drainage and systematization of the disease are rare and most lesions disappear in about three years. This case aims to show the effectiveness of the treatment used (lymecycline 150 mg/orally/day). This medication may be a new therapeutic option for the treatment of Mycobacterium marinum.

Treatment of Mycobacterium marinum with lymecycline: new therapeutic alternative?

Skin infections by Mycobacterium marinum are quite rare in our environment and, therefore, little studied. The majority of the lesions appear three weeks after traumas in aquariums, beaches and fish tanks. Lymph node drainage and systematization of the disease are rare and most lesions disappear in about three years. This case aims to show the effectiveness of the treatment used (lymecycline 150 mg/orally/day). This medication may be a new therapeutic option for the treatment of Mycobacterium marinum.

Safety and efficacy comparison of minocycline microgranules vs lymecycline in the treatment of mild to moderate acne: randomized, evaluator-blinded, parallel, and prospective clinical trial for 8 weeks.

BACKGROUND: Minocycline and lymecycline are used in the treatment of acne, but there is not enough evidence to support superior efficacy of one of them. METHODS: 170 participants from 14 to 34 years old with mild to moderate facial acne vulgaris were recruited. 84 had 100 mg of minocycline in a single daily dose for 8 weeks and 86 had 300 mg of lymecycline in a single daily dose for 8 weeks. Participants were evaluated at baseline, week 4 and week 8. RESULTS: 65 minocycline and 60 lymecycline patients were evaluable. The last observation carried forward for the count of non-inflammatory lesions changed from 37.5 ± 17.8 to 37.7 ± 17.8 in the minocycline group and from 36.9 ± 15.5 to 33.4 ± 19.3 in the lymecycline group (no significant changes); corresponding changes in inflammatory lesions were from 19.4 ± 12.4 to 12.2 ± 10.0 in the minocycline group and from 20.1 ± 11.3 to 12.6 ± 8.4 in lymecycline group (P< 0.05 comparing baseline vs. final in both groups). Porphyrin counts varied from 899.5 ± 613.9 to 233.5 ± 219.5 in the minocycline group and from 956.9 ± 661.8 to 411.8 ± 411.5 in the lymecycline group (P<0.05 between the groups at study end). 36 (42.9%) patients receiving minocycline suffered 55 adverse events (22 of them gastrointestinal), while 28 (33.3%) lymecycline patients had 37 adverse events (15 of them gastrointestinal). One patient in the lymecycline group withdrew the study due to gastritis, and one more patient in the same group experienced eosinophilia. CONCLUSIONS: There were no differences between the groups in non-inflammatory and inflammatory lesion counts, and in the safety profile. Treatment with minocycline induced statistically significant decrease in facial porphyrin counts compared to the group treated with lymecycline (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00988026).

Pre-emptive skin toxicity treatment for anti-EGFR drugs: evaluation of efficacy of skin moisturizers and lymecycline. A phase II study.

BACKGROUND: Anti-epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) target therapies like erlotinib for metastatic lung cancer and cetuximab or panitumumab for metastatic colorectal cancer (mCRC) cause skin reaction that seems to be related to treatment efficacy. Skin toxicity evaluation protocol with panitumumab study has shown that preemptive treatment reduces the incidence of ≥Grade 2 (G2) skin toxicity in mCRC treated with panitumumab. Aim of this study is to evaluate if preemptive skin toxicity treatment with different drugs has good efficacy in patients receiving anti-EGFR therapies, such as cetuximab, panitumumab, and erlotinib, for mCRC and metastatic lung cancer. METHODS: Treatment included skin moisturizers with sunscreen and lymecycline 300 mg/daily. Primary objective is to reduce the incidence of ≥G2 skin toxicity during the first 3 months of therapy. Toxicities are reported with confidence interval at 95%. Quality of life was assessed with Dermatology Life Quality Index every 2 weeks and evaluated with repeated measure ANOVA. RESULTS: Fifty-one patients with mCRC (60.8%) and metastatic lung cancer (39.2%) were enrolled. Anticancer drugs were erlotinib/cetuximab/panitumumab 20:30:1. At 3-month evaluation, 27.4% patients had =G2 skin toxicity. Skin toxicity was not related with age (p = 0.67), sex (p = 0.65), previous chemotherapy regimens (p = 0.41), and current anti-EGFR treatment (p = 0.22). No gastrointestinal or hematological toxicities related to lymecycline were observed. Only six patients required further drugs. Quality of life analysis did not show a significant difference from the beginning and the end of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Data show efficacy of preemptive treatment with a well-tolerated profile. A reduction of severe skin toxicities is shown with an increase of grade 1 toxicities, not leading to anti-EGFR dose reduction and with better quality of life for patients.