RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BRCL) is one of the most common causes of upper extremity (UE) lymphedema in developed nations and substantially impacts health-related quality of life. To advance our understanding of the epidemiology and treatment of BRCL, rigorously developed and validated patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) are needed. This study aimed to demonstrate the iterative content validity of a modular UE lymphedema-specific PROM called the LYMPH-Q UE module. METHODS: A multi-step iterative qualitative approach was used. Semi-structured interview data from in-depth qualitative interviews with adult women (18 years and older) with BCRL were used to develop the first set of the LYMPH-Q UE scales. The content validity of these scales was demonstrated with patient and clinician feedback. Over the course of cognitive debriefing interviews, additional concepts of lymphedema worry and impact on work were identified as missing from the LYMPH-Q UE module. Subsequently, two new qualitative studies (a focus group and in-depth concept elicitation interviews with patients) were conducted, and two new scales were developed to measure lymphedema worry and impact on work life and their content validity was demonstrated. RESULTS: Qualitative data from in-depth and cognitive interviews with 15 (age 40-74 years) and 16 (age 38-74 years) women with BRCL, respectively, and feedback from 12 clinical experts, were used to develop and demonstrate the content validity of six LYMPH-Q UE scales measuring symptoms, function, appearance, psychological, information, and arm sleeve. Additionally, data from in-depth interviews with 12 (age 35-72 years) women with UE lymphedema and four focus groups (n = 16 women; age 35-74 years) was used to develop and assess the content validity of two new LYMPH-Q UE scales measuring lymphedema worry and impact on work life. The content validity of the previously established six scales was also demonstrated in these subsequent qualitative studies. CONCLUSION: The LYMPH-Q UE is a modular PROM developed using international guidelines for PROM development and can be used in clinical practice, research, and quality improvement to enhance patient-centered shared decision-making. This study's innovative and iterative approach to content validation demonstrates that the LYMPH-Q UE is a comprehensive measure that includes important concepts relevant to patients with UE lymphedema.
Asunto(s)
Medición de Resultados Informados por el Paciente , Investigación Cualitativa , Calidad de Vida , Extremidad Superior , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Extremidad Superior/fisiopatología , Anciano , Entrevistas como Asunto , Adulto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Linfedema/psicología , Linfedema/diagnóstico , Linfedema/terapia , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/terapia , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/diagnóstico , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/psicología , Grupos Focales , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Psicometría/métodos , Psicometría/instrumentaciónRESUMEN
Lymphedema is a progressive lymphatic disease that potentiates physical and psychosocial distress. Despite its impact, patients reportedly encounter lymphatic ignorance throughout the healthcare system. This cross-sectional study aims to summarize clinical characteristics and interactions of lymphedema patients within the healthcare system. Two lymphedema patient cohorts were included: The Global Registry Analysis Cohort included lymphedema patients who contributed to an international digital lymphatic registry and the Interactions Cohort included patients who initiated a questionnaire about interactions with the medical system. The global registry was used to obtain demographic and clinical characteristics from affiliated lymphedema patients. A 23-item online questionnaire on healthcare experiences and satisfaction with lymphatic healthcare was then distributed to the Interactions Cohort. Complete responses were obtained from 2474 participants. Participants were a mean age of 57.5 ± 16.1 years and 51.4% had a cancer history. Participants reported substantial delays in diagnosis and treatment. Cancer-related and non-cancer-related lymphedema patients reported similar levels of perceived physician disinterest in their lymphedema; however, non-cancer-related lymphedema patients reported more care dissatisfaction. Ultimately, patients continue to face delays in lymphedema diagnosis and treatment. We developed an evidence-based model highlighting areas of reform needed to improve lymphatic education and healthcare.
Asunto(s)
Linfedema , Humanos , Linfedema/epidemiología , Linfedema/psicología , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Anciano , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Atención a la Salud , Satisfacción del Paciente , Sistema de Registros , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Neoplasias/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the foot-health-related quality of life in individuals with versus without lower-limb lymphedema. METHODS: A case-control study was carried out in an academic clinic in Lisbon, Portugal. Eighty participants (40 controls and 40 with lymphedema) were included in the study. The researchers examined sociodemographic and clinical data and foot-health-related quality of life in both groups. In the group with lymphedema, lower-limb lymphedema was also characterized. RESULTS: Individuals with lower-limb lymphedema had significantly lower scores on all dimensions of the Foot Health Status Questionnaire in comparison with the control group. CONCLUSIONS: Individuals with lower-limb lymphedema appear to have a poorer foot-health-related quality of life than the general population.
Asunto(s)
Linfedema , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Linfedema/psicología , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Anciano , Portugal , Enfermedades del Pie , Estado de SaludRESUMEN
Lymphoedema arises when the lymphatic system has been damaged and may occur secondary to cancer treatment. While much of the extant literature focuses on quality of life in females with breast cancer- related lymphoedema, this study explores the impact of living with lymphoedema secondary to cancer treatment in males. Semi-structured interviews were conducted with 13 male participants, aged between 50 to 85 years. Data collected were analysed using interpretative phenomenological analysis. The super-ordinate theme 'Hit by a wave' encompasses the profound impact of lymphoedema on the participants' quality of life. The males expressed body image concerns and struggled with feelings of frustration, anger, anxiety and depression. Physical changes such as weight increase, disrupted sleep, pain, swollen genitals and urinary difficulties were experienced. Changes in lifestyle were also expressed, such as an increased dependence on carers; work-related and role changes. Nevertheless, many participants endorsed the need to focus on the present moment and expressed a heightened appreciation of authenticity in life. By understanding the unique narratives of males with lymphoedema, health care practitioners together with patients can formulate care plans that truly resonate with the needs, concerns, and experiences of males living with lymphoedema.
Asunto(s)
Linfedema , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Linfedema/psicología , Linfedema/etiología , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Imagen Corporal/psicología , Depresión/psicología , Neoplasias/complicaciones , Neoplasias/psicología , AnsiedadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This prospective, longitudinal, pragmatic study describes at home treatment with a proprietary advanced pneumatic compression device (APCD) for patients with lower extremity lymphedema (LED). METHODS: Following institutiona review board approval, four participating Veterans Affairs centers enrolled LED patients from 2016 to 2022. The primary outcome measures were health-related quality of life (HR-QoL) questionnaires (lymphedema quality of life-leg and the generic SF-36v2) obtained at baseline and 12, 24, and 52 weeks. The secondary outcome measures were limb circumference, cellulitis events, skin quality, and compliance with APCD and other compression therapies. RESULTS: Because a portion of the trial was conducted during the coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic, 179 patients had 52 weeks of follow-up, and 143 had complete measurements at all time points. The baseline characteristics were a mean age of 66.9 ± 10.8 years, 91% were men, and the mean body mass index was 33.8 ± 6.9 kg/m2. LED was bilateral in 92.2% of the patients. Chronic venous insufficiency or phlebolymphedema was the most common etiology of LED (112 patients; 62.6%), followed by trauma or surgery (20 patients; 11.2%). Cancer treatment as a cause was low (4 patients; 2.3%). Patients were classified as having International Society for Lymphology (ISL) stage I (68.4%), II (27.6%), or III (4.1%). Of the primary outcome measures, significant improvements were observed in all lymphedema quality of life-leg domains of function, appearance, symptoms, and emotion and the overall score after 12 weeks of treatment (P < .0001) and through 52 weeks of follow-up. The SF-36v2 demonstrated significant improvement in three domains at 12 weeks and in the six domains of physical function, bodily pain, physical component (P < .0001), social functioning (P = .0181), role-physical (P < .0005), and mental health (P < .0334) at 52 weeks. An SF-36v2 score <40 indicates a substantial reduction in HR-QoL in LED patients compared with U.S. norms. Regarding the secondary outcome measures at 52 weeks, compared with baseline, the mean limb girth decreased by 1.4 cm (P < .0001). The maximal reduction in mean limb girth was 1.9 cm (6.0%) at 12 weeks in ISL stage II and III limbs. New episodes of cellulitis in patients with previous episodes (21.4% vs 6.1%, P = .001) were reduced. The 75% of patients with skin hyperpigmentation at baseline decreased to 40% (P < .01) at 52 weeks. At 52 weeks, compliance, defined as use for 5 to 7 days per week, was reported for the APCD by 72% and for elastic stockings by 74%. CONCLUSIONS: This longitudinal study of Veterans Affairs patients with LED demonstrated improved generic and disease-specific HR-QoL through 52 weeks with at home use of an APCD. Limb girth, cellulitis episodes, and skin discoloration were reduced, with excellent compliance.
Asunto(s)
Aparatos de Compresión Neumática Intermitente , Extremidad Inferior , Linfedema , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Linfedema/terapia , Linfedema/etiología , Linfedema/psicología , Linfedema/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Estudios Longitudinales , Extremidad Inferior/irrigación sanguínea , Resultado del Tratamiento , COVID-19/complicaciones , COVID-19/terapia , Estados Unidos , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is the most prevalent comorbidity that occurs following breast cancer treatments and has negative impact on the patients' quality of life (QoL). The Lymphedema Functioning, Disability, and Health Questionnaire for Upper Limb Lymphedema (Lymph-ICF-UL) is a valid and reliable instrument in assessing the QoL of patients with BCRL. However, the Bahasa Malaysia (BM) version is not available yet. This study aimed to translate the Lymph-ICF-UL into BM and to evaluate its validity and reliability. Methods and Results: A forward-backward translation was performed based on Sousa's guideline, and then, the face, content, construct validity, internal consistency, and test-retest reliability were tested. Face validity was assessed by five patients, and content validity was evaluated by six experts. Then, construct validity and internal validity were assessed in 107 patients. Finally, test-retest reliability was analyzed in 21 patients. Two items were eliminated following suggestions from the patients and experts. All patients found the scoring system and items clear and relevant. The results showed sufficient content validity index and modified kappa statistics value. Confirmatory factor analysis showed acceptable fit indices. Cronbach's alpha values ranged from 0.67 to 0.95, intraclass correlation coefficient ranged from 0.88 to 0.99, standard error measurement was 2.29-6.15, and the Bland-Altman plot showed an agreement between two test occasions. Conclusion: These results suggested that the Lymph-ICF-UL BM has good validity and reliability in evaluating the QoL of patients with BCRL in Malaysia.
Asunto(s)
Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama , Psicometría , Calidad de Vida , Extremidad Superior , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Malasia/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/diagnóstico , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/epidemiología , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/psicología , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/etiología , Extremidad Superior/fisiopatología , Adulto , Anciano , Linfedema/etiología , Linfedema/diagnóstico , Linfedema/epidemiología , Linfedema/psicología , Evaluación de la Discapacidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , TraducciónRESUMEN
Background: Breast cancer survivors (BCSs) have many lifelong symptoms of anxiety, depression, lymphedema, and fatigue that can be exacerbated by sleep disturbance. However, little is known about unique factors contributing to sleep disturbance among BCSs with lymphedema; this requires further investigation to offer appropriate support and treatment to these individuals. Therefore, the objective of this study was to capture perceptions and experiences of lymphedema and sleep among BCSs with lymphedema. Methods and Results: Qualitative description guided data collection and analysis as part of a mixed-methods investigation to characterize sleep disturbance among BCSs with and without lymphedema. The participants were interviewed one-on-one using a semistructured interview guide. Inductive content analysis was completed using an iterative coding approach, condensing, and categorizing to develop four themes. Seven BCSs with lymphedema participated. From their narratives, four themes were developed: (1) mind and body fatigue are exacerbated by sleep disturbance; (2) fatigue impacted fragile coping and support systems; (3) fatigue influenced self-identity and roles in society; and (4) self-management strategies were used for sleep health. Conclusion: The participants' perceptions of sleep disturbances' impact on their lives endorse further investigation into optimal interventions to improve sleep quality and modify these impactful findings to create a higher quality of life for survivorship.
Asunto(s)
Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Fatiga , Investigación Cualitativa , Calidad de Vida , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Fatiga/etiología , Fatiga/fisiopatología , Fatiga/psicología , Fatiga/diagnóstico , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/etiología , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/psicología , Trastornos del Sueño-Vigilia/fisiopatología , Anciano , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/psicología , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/etiología , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/diagnóstico , Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Adaptación Psicológica , Sueño/fisiología , Adulto , Linfedema/etiología , Linfedema/psicología , Linfedema/patologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the clinical performance, quality of life (QoL) and patient satisfaction with an innovative flat-knit compression garment for the daytime treatment of lymphoedema patients in daily routine. METHOD: In a prospective multicentre observational study, patients with leg or arm lymphoedema (stage I-II, International Society of Lymphology (ISL) standards, 2016) received a made-to-measure flat-knit compression class 2 JOBST Confidence (BSN-JOBST GmbH, Germany) thigh-high stocking or arm sleeve. Primary endpoint was the oedema status as determined by the mean sum of the circumferences at the beginning and the end of the wearing period. Secondary endpoints included QoL-related parameters and patient satisfaction with product features assessed through questionnaires. The observation period lasted three weeks. RESULTS: A total of 97 patients (87 females, 10 males), of which 65 had leg lymphoedema and 32 had arm lymphoedema, received the study device. The oedema status was effectively maintained (slight reduction in mean sum of circumferences by -3.1±7.3cm; p=0.0001). For QoL-related parameters, the patients reported fewer limitations in work, leisure and psychological wellbeing after wearing the stocking or arm sleeve (all p-values <0.0001). They also experienced less limitations in function and movement, feeling of tension and heaviness, and fewer difficulties wearing clothes, shoes, jewellery or watches at study end (all p-values <0.0001). In terms of pleasant feeling on the skin, moisture management, softness of material, range of motion, overall wearing comfort and heat build-up under the garment, patients were more satisfied with the tested compression garment than with previously worn compression garments (all p-values <0.001). CONCLUSION: In this study, the tested innovative compression product increased patient satisfaction with the improved product features while the lymphoedema status was successfully maintained.
Asunto(s)
Linfedema , Calidad de Vida , Masculino , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Linfedema/terapia , Linfedema/psicología , Vendajes de Compresión , Edema/terapia , ZapatosRESUMEN
Importance: Higher lymphedema rates after axillary lymph node dissection (ALND) have been found in Black and Hispanic women; however, there is poor correlation between subjective symptoms, quality of life (QOL), and measured lymphedema. Additionally, racial and ethnic differences in QOL have been understudied. Objective: To evaluate the association of race and ethnicity with long-term QOL in patients with breast cancer treated with ALND. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study enrolled women aged 18 years and older with breast cancer who underwent unilateral ALND at a tertiary cancer center between November 2016 and March 2020. Preoperatively and at 6-month intervals, arm volume was measured by perometer and QOL was assessed using the Upper Limb Lymphedema-27 (ULL-27) questionnaire, a validated tool for assessing lymphedema that evaluates how arm symptoms affect physical, psychological, and social functioning. Data were analyzed from November 2016 to October 2023. Exposures: Breast surgery and unilateral ALND in the primary setting or after sentinel lymph node biopsy. Main Outcomes and Measures: Scores in each domain of the ULL-27 were compared by race and ethnicity. Factors impacting QOL were identified using multivariable regression analyses. Results: The study included 281 women (median [IQR] age, 48 [41-58] years) with breast cancer who underwent unilateral ALND and had at least 6 months of follow-up. Of these, 30 patients (11%) self-identified as Asian individuals, 57 (20%) as Black individuals, 23 (8%) as Hispanic individuals, and 162 (58%) as White individuals; 9 individuals (3%) who did not identify as part of a particular group or who were missing race and ethnicity data were categorized as having unknown race and ethnicity. Median (IQR) follow-up was 2.97 (1.96-3.67) years. The overall 2-year lymphedema rate was 20% and was higher among Black (31%) and Hispanic (27%) women compared with Asian (15%) and White (17%) women (P = .04). Subjective arm swelling was more common among Asian (57%), Black (70%), and Hispanic (87%) women than White (44%) women (P < .001), and lower physical QOL scores were reported by racial and ethnic minority women at nearly every follow-up. For example, at 24 months, median QOL scores were 87, 79, and 80 for Asian, Black, and Hispanic women compared with 92 for White women (P = .003). On multivariable analysis, Asian race (ß = -5.7; 95% CI, -9.5 to -1.8), Hispanic ethnicity (ß = -10.0; 95% CI, -15.0 to -5.2), and having Medicaid (ß = -5.4; 95% CI, -9.2 to -1.7) or Medicare insurance (ß = -6.9; 95% CI, -10.0 to -3.4) were independently associated with worse physical QOL (all P < .001). Conclusions and Relevance: Findings of this cohort study suggest that Asian, Black, and Hispanic women experience more subjective arm swelling after unilateral ALND for breast cancer compared with White women. Black and Hispanic women had higher rates of objective lymphedema than their White counterparts. Both minority status and public medical insurance were associated with worse physical QOL. Understanding disparities in QOL after ALND is an unmet need and may enable targeted interventions to improve QOL for these patients.
Asunto(s)
Axila , Neoplasias de la Mama , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Mama/etnología , Adulto , Linfedema/etnología , Linfedema/psicología , Minorías Étnicas y Raciales , Hispánicos o Latinos/psicología , Hispánicos o Latinos/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etnologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To assess the effect of complex decongestive therapy treatment (CDT) on quality of life, neck disability, cervical range of motion, and facial and neck lymphedema size using specific anatomical landmark points. METHODS: This prospective study was conducted in a tertiary cancer center in Turkey. Thirty patients included in the study were treated with CDT for 21 days. The patients were evaluated before and after CDT with MD Anderson Cancer Center Head and Neck Lymphedema (MDACC HNC) staging system, The Neck Disability Index, European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life 30 (EORTC-QLOC30), Facial Composite score and Neck Circumferences, cervical range of motion. RESULTS: Median follow-up was 7.2 months. After treatment of 30 patients significant cognitive function, emotional function, and social function (p < 0.001). After CDT treatment, the quality of life sub-parameters of EORTC QLQ-C30 showed significant improvement (p < 0.001). The facial composite score and neck circumferences indices showed significant improvement (p < 0.001). A decrease of 2% or more in the facial composite score and neck circumferences was observed in all patients participating in the study. CONCLUSION: There have been few studies on the effectiveness of CDT on the EORTC QLQ-C30, facial composite score, and neck circumferences in head and neck lymphedema. In patients with head and neck lymphedema following head and neck cancer, our study demonstrated the positive effects of complex decongestive therapy (CDT) on neck disability, range of motion, quality of life, and facial and neck lymphedema tissue size. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 134:3152-3157, 2024.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Linfedema , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linfedema/terapia , Linfedema/psicología , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/terapia , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/complicaciones , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/psicología , Adulto , Anciano , Cuello , Rango del Movimiento Articular , Resultado del Tratamiento , Turquía , Estudios de SeguimientoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Lower extremity lymphedema (LEL), which causes ankle, leg, and feet swelling, poses a significant challenge for endometrial cancer survivors, impacting physical functioning and psychological well-being. Inconsistent LEL diagnostic methods result in wide-ranging LEL incidence estimates. METHODS: We calculated the cumulative incidence of LEL based on survivor-reported Gynecologic Cancer Lymphedema Questionnaire (GCLQ) responses in addition to survivor- and nurse-reported leg circumference measurements among a pilot sample of 50 endometrial cancer survivors (27 White, 23 Black) enrolled in the ongoing population-based Carolina Endometrial Cancer Study. RESULTS: Self-leg circumference measurements were perceived to be difficult and were completed by only 17 survivors. Diagnostic accuracy testing measures (sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value) compared the standard nurse-measured ≥ 10% difference in leg circumference measurements to GCLQ responses. At a mean of ~11 months post-diagnosis, 54% of survivors met established criteria for LEL based on ≥ 4 GCLQ cutpoint while 24% had LEL based on nurse-measurement. Percent agreement, sensitivity, and specificity approximated 60% at a threshold of ≥ 5 GCLQ symptoms. However, Cohen's kappa, a measure of reliability that corrects for agreement by chance, was highest at ≥ 4 GCLQ symptoms (κ = 0.27). CONCLUSION: Our findings emphasize the need for high quality measurements of LEL that are feasible for epidemiologic study designs among endometrial cancer survivors. Future studies should use patient-reported survey measures to assess lymphedema burden and quality of life outcomes among endometrial cancer survivors.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias Endometriales , Linfedema , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias Endometriales/complicaciones , Neoplasias Endometriales/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linfedema/etiología , Linfedema/epidemiología , Linfedema/diagnóstico , Linfedema/psicología , Anciano , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Autoevaluación (Psicología) , Adulto , IncidenciaRESUMEN
Background:The experiences of women who develop lymphoedema in the breast or trunk (BTL) after treatment for breast cancer have received little attention in either the academic or clinical setting. Consequently, women's support needs remain unrecognized.Objective and Design:As this study sought to gain an understanding of women's unheard experiences of a poorly understood condition, it was underpinned by The Silences Framework1 which facilitates research into sensitive or marginalized issues.Sample and Methods:Fourteen women with BTL participated in individual, unstructured interviews, some using photographs or drawings to reflect their experiences. The data was analyzed using the Listening Guide.2Findings:Participants revealed that they were unprepared for the development of BTL; for many, the symptoms were unfamiliar and distressing. Furthermore, their concerns were often dismissed by healthcare professionals (HCPs), leading to long delays in obtaining an accurate diagnosis and treatment. For some women, the practical and emotional impact of developing BTL was profound.Practice Implications:Increased awareness and education about the risk of BTL as a potential side-effect of treatment for breast cancer is required for HCPs and patients. This will alleviate distress, better prepare patients, and ensure timely referral for treatment to manage this chronic condition.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfedema , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Mama/terapia , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Emociones , Linfedema/etiología , Linfedema/psicología , Linfedema/terapia , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
Background: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL) is correlated with poor quality of life (QOL). The effects of the management of lymphedema on QOL remain controversial. We analyzed the changes in QOL and identified factors associated with its improvement to improve the care of patients with BCRL. Methods and Results: A total of 194 patients with BCRL were recruited, and their medical records were reviewed regarding type of surgery, chemotherapy, and radiation. Patients completed the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaires, and the volume and circumference of lymphedema were measured. Significant improvements in physical, emotional, cognitive, social, and role functioning, and future perspective were observed after BCRL management. However, the change in the size of lymphedema was not correlated with the change in QOL parameters. Conclusion: The management of BCRL has a beneficial effect on QOL. However, changes in the size of lymphedema did not reflect changes in QOL. Therefore, a comprehensive approach for the management of BCRL beyond reducing the size of lymphedema is recommended to improve QOL.
Asunto(s)
Linfedema del Cáncer de Mama , Neoplasias de la Mama , Linfedema , Humanos , Femenino , Calidad de Vida , Linfedema/psicología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Although lower limb lymphedema (LLL) is more or equally as frequent and harmful as upper limb lymphedema after cancer treatment, there are only a few studies on this topic. Cancer-related secondary LLL not only has physical implications, but also affects quality of life among patients who underwent gynecological cancer treatment. Despite numerous studies of various therapies, the optimal treatment for cancer-related LLL is still unknown. OBJECTIVES: We aimed to investigate the efficacy of lumbar sympathetic ganglion block (LSGB) in patients with secondary LLL in the present study. STUDY DESIGN: This study is a retrospective study. SETTING: A single academic hospital, outpatient setting. METHODS: A total of 30 patients with secondary unilateral LLL and failed complex decongestive treatment, from January 2017 through May 2021, were reviewed for inclusion in this study. The patients underwent fluoroscopy-guided LSGB 2 times with the help of digital subtraction angiography at 3-day intervals. Leg circumference was measured, and the volume of the leg was calculated before surgery, on the first day after the first surgery, on the first day after the second surgery, and on the seventh day after the second surgery. The World Health Organization Quality of Life Instrument Questionnaire scores were monitored before and after LSGB. RESULTS: The leg circumference and volume decreased significantly from baseline after the treatment (P < 0.001). One week after 2 rounds of LSGB, the physical health score, psychological score, and social relationships score were higher than those before treatment (all P < 0.05). There was no difference in the environmental health score (P = 0.2731). LIMITATIONS: This study was limited by its sample size and retrospective observational design. CONCLUSIONS: LSGB can be a safe and effective treatment option for patients with secondary LLL after gynecological cancer treatment.
Asunto(s)
Linfedema , Neoplasias , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Calidad de Vida , Extremidad Inferior , Linfedema/psicología , Linfedema/terapia , Ganglios SimpáticosRESUMEN
Introduction: Breast cancer-related lymphedema (BCRL), a side effect of cancer treatment, may negatively impact the ability to perform work. Factors such as delayed diagnosis, late-stage disease, and a high percentage of service occupations may challenge work choices for Latinas after BCRL diagnosis. Methods: Our multiple case study explored work experiences and quality of life (QOL) for Hispanic/Latina survivors. Participants completed demographic and short form-36 (SF-36) surveys. Semi-structured interviews focused on how work environment, self-management, and QOL were influenced by BCRL. Thematic analysis of cases used In Vivo and descriptive coding and constant cross-case comparative methods. Results: Analysis illustrated how Hispanic/Latina survivors perceive the influence of BCRL on work experience as requiring adaptation and personal resilience. Participants identified BCRL knowledge gap challenges and described coping with physical, psychosocial, and work activity changes. They described creative work adaptations and discussed BCRL's impact on both positive and negative interpersonal perceptions. Strong support from family, friends, and colleagues contributed to improved QOL and continued work activities. Conclusion: Future research should incorporate coping strategies and creative management of BCRL to optimize work activities across the lifespan. These strategies can provide guidance for the creation of survivorship care plans, education of healthcare professionals (HCPs), and lifelong occupational support.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama , Supervivientes de Cáncer , Linfedema , Neoplasias de la Mama/complicaciones , Neoplasias de la Mama/psicología , Femenino , Hispánicos o Latinos , Humanos , Linfedema/etiología , Linfedema/psicología , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Sobrevivientes/psicologíaRESUMEN
Genital lymphoedema is recognised as a rare consequence of cancer surgery or its treatment, which also occurs with primary lymphoedema. Over recent years, there has been an increased understanding of the condition; however, good assessment, early recognition and effective management are crucial to prevent the progression and improve the lives of those with this condition. Treatment needs to be individualised and the psychosocial and emotional aspects of the condition need to be carefully considered to ensure that the patient can achieve successful outcomes with realistic expectations.
Asunto(s)
Linfedema , Genitales , Humanos , Linfedema/psicologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lower limb disorders including lymphoedema create a huge burden for affected persons in their physical and mental health, as well as socioeconomic and psychosocial consequences for them, their families and communities. As routine health services for the integrated management and prevention of lower limb disorders are still lacking, the 'Excellence in Disability Prevention Integrated across Neglected Tropical Diseases' (EnDPoINT) study was implemented to assess the development and delivery of an integrated package of holistic care-including physical health, mental health and psychosocial care-within routine health services for persons with lower limb disorders caused by podoconiosis, lymphatic filariasis and leprosy. METHODOLOGY/PRINCIPAL FINDINGS: This study was part of the first of three phases within EnDPoINT, involving the development of the integrated care package. Focus group discussions and key informant interviews were undertaken with 34 participants between January-February 2019 in Awi zone, Ethiopia, in order to assess the draft care package's feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness. Persons affected by lower limb disorders such as lymphoedema experience stigma, exclusion from families, communities and work as well as physical and financial hardship. Beliefs in disease causation inhibit affected persons from accessing care. Ignorance was a barrier for health care providers as well as affected persons. Training and education of affected persons, communities and caregivers is important in improving care access. It also requires time, space, materials and financial resources. Both top-down and grass roots input into service development are key, as well as collaboration across stakeholders including charities, community leaders and "expert patients". CONCLUSIONS/SIGNIFICANCE: This study highlighted the need for the EnDPoINT integrated care package and provided suggestions for solutions according to its three aspects of integrated care (integration into routine care; integration of mental health and psychosocial care; and integration of care across the three diseases), thereby giving support for its feasibility, acceptability and appropriateness.
Asunto(s)
Prestación Integrada de Atención de Salud/métodos , Filariasis Linfática/epidemiología , Elefantiasis/epidemiología , Lepra/epidemiología , Linfedema/psicología , Adulto , Elefantiasis/psicología , Elefantiasis/terapia , Filariasis Linfática/psicología , Filariasis Linfática/terapia , Etiopía/epidemiología , Femenino , Grupos Focales , Servicios de Salud , Salud Holística , Humanos , Lepra/psicología , Lepra/terapia , Extremidad Inferior/patología , Linfedema/epidemiología , Linfedema/terapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Rehabilitación Psiquiátrica , Estigma Social , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Lymphedema is a debilitating disease and may be a comorbidity of obesity. New molecules have been investigated for the treatment of lymphedema; one of the most promising molecules is hydroxytyrosol. The aim of this study was to evaluate the association between mutations in genes mutated in lymphedema and the presence of obesity and making an estimate of the quality of life in lymphedema patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We recruited 71 Caucasian individuals with the diagnosis of primary lymphedema, and they undertook a questionnaire to assess their quality life. For this purpose, we developed a NGS custom-made panel comprising genes associated with lymphedema. RESULTS: An obesity rate of 20% was detected. The average Lymph-ICF-LL value for patients who consume olive oil daily was 20 with a better quality of life. Twenty-three patients resulted positive to the genetic test. Genetic variants with a likely association with obesity have been identified in PROX1, FOXC2 and FLT4. CONCLUSIONS: A obesity rate, higher than that reported by ISTAT, was detected. The use of olive oil enhances the quality of life of lymphedema patients. Moreover, a diagnostic approach by a NGS panel shows an association of lymphedema with obesity.
Asunto(s)
Linfedema/dietoterapia , Linfedema/genética , Obesidad/dietoterapia , Obesidad/genética , Aceite de Oliva/administración & dosificación , Alcohol Feniletílico/análogos & derivados , Calidad de Vida , Adulto , Antioxidantes/administración & dosificación , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Cohortes , Biología Computacional/métodos , Femenino , Pruebas Genéticas/métodos , Humanos , Linfedema/psicología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obesidad/psicología , Alcohol Feniletílico/administración & dosificación , Calidad de Vida/psicología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Background: The aim of this study was to explore how self-management is taught, learnt, and experienced during a 3-day educational Lymphedema Camp for parents of children with lymphedema. Methods: Participants (professionals, parents, and children) were observed during camp activities and interviewed informally and formally in focus groups. The embodied nature of the experience expressed by professionals, parents, and researchers became the analytical focus for understanding the felt tensions in the teaching and learning of self-management to families. Findings: The affective sensibilities associated with the uncertainties involved in teaching and learning self-management skills were palpable given that: young people are now expected to take up strict time-consuming self-management regimens (often via the support of a parent) where "evidence-based" outcomes are uncertain or may not match the outcomes wanted by a young person (varying in age and therefore ability or willingness to engage); or where there are tensions within the family; and the variety of different professionals involved means that techniques varied but where these professionals also lacked the necessary skills training to guide them in how to teach self-management. An analytical focus on the distress, doubt, fear, loneliness, guilt, and moralism felt by professionals, parents, and the researchers supports us to identify the character of the problems associated with performing best practice care guidance where there is a lack of practical support or resources for how self-management in this population should be achieved. Conclusion: To avoid these issues more training and research are needed on "how" to self-manage and stop victim-blaming that generates tensions and drives a wedge between the carer and the cared-for. When systemic problems get located with individuals (professionals, parents, or children), this directs our attention and understanding away from systems of care that lack coordination, may be under-resourced, and where effective training is absent.
Asunto(s)
Linfedema , Automanejo , Adolescente , Antropología Cultural , Cuidadores/psicología , Niño , Humanos , Linfedema/diagnóstico , Linfedema/psicología , Linfedema/terapia , Padres/educación , Automanejo/educaciónRESUMEN
Background: Self-management is a key aspect of lymphedema treatment and self-efficacy is a key factor linked to long-term adherence to treatment. The study aimed to generate self-efficacy scales to support the care of children and adolescents with lymphedema to support self-management. Methods and Results: Parents of children with lymphedema and the professionals caring for them were recruited during a lymphedema educational camp. Six individual semistructured focus groups were undertaken in Italian, French, and English (three for parents and three for professionals) with simultaneous translation. Scale item generation was developed using interpretative phenomenological analysis and adopted Bandura's self-efficacy concept. Two self-efficacy tools were developed from research with 26 parents and 14 professionals. The parental tool (ILF parent SE) has 6 domains and 44 items: school; home and leisure; understanding the condition and treatment, and managing child and parent emotions. The professional tool (ILF Professional SE) has 4 domains and 21 items. This scale has two parts; the first indicates the level of professional autonomy in decision making, and the second covers assessment and treatment, patient understanding, and managing emotional reactions. Both tools adopt a 0- to 100-point scale using a 10-unit interval with 0 (cannot do) through to 100 (high certainty of being able to do). Initial face validity has been undertaken. Conclusion: Self-efficacy has emerged as a complex issue faced by parents and professionals involved with children and young people with lymphedema. By being able to assess the challenges parents face in self-efficacy individualized programs can be developed that will assist families in managing this complex disease and lead to greater well-being. Increased professional self-awareness will help the development of mentorship programs to support professionals dealing daily with the stress of managing a rare disease in which the outcome may be uncertain.