Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 2 de 2
Filtrar
Más filtros












Base de datos
Intervalo de año de publicación
1.
Ann Hematol ; 98(1): 175-183, 2019 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30315345

RESUMEN

Follicular lymphoma (FL) and marginal zone lymphoma (MZL) are two subtypes of indolent B cell non-Hodgkin lymphoma (NHL) that account for approximately 20% and 12% of all NHLs, respectively. FL and MZL are rare conditions with orphan disease designations. We conducted a comprehensive review of the burden of FL and MZL that encompasses the epidemiological, real world clinical, economic, and humanistic impact of these diseases globally. A targeted literature search identified 31 eligible studies for review. Epidemiological coverage was poor, with data obtained for studies from only seven countries. The incidences of both subtypes were low: age-standardized incidence rates of FL ranged from 2.1/100,000 in France to 4.3/100,000 in the USA, while for MZL it varied geographically from 0.5/100,000 in Australia to 2.6/100,000 in the UK. The cumulative total direct healthcare costs for FL were higher for patients with progressive disease compared to those without ($30,890 vs. $8704 at 12 months, respectively) and main driver of costs related to the use of chemotherapy. Five-year overall survival was improved in patients with FL compared with MZL (e.g., 76.5% vs 60.7% in one study that reported on both subtypes). Mortality rates were particularly lower in female patients with FL aged < 60 years. However, limited outcome data for MZL patients were identified. FL and MZL contribute significant burden on healthcare systems and on patients globally, with delays in progression potentially leading to cost savings. More rigorous characterization of these two NHL subtypes, new and more effective treatments, and standardization of reporting would lead to a more robust understanding of future data in this disease area.


Asunto(s)
Costo de Enfermedad , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal , Linfoma Folicular , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/economía , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/mortalidad , Linfoma Folicular/tratamiento farmacológico , Linfoma Folicular/economía , Linfoma Folicular/mortalidad , Masculino , Tasa de Supervivencia
2.
Gastroenterol Hepatol ; 32(1): 2-8, 2009 Jan.
Artículo en Español | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-19174093

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: We analyzed the need to routinely perform a second gastroscopy after an initial diagnosis of benign gastric ulcer. METHOD: A total of 226 consecutive cases of gastric ulcer were reviewed. Sensitivity (S), specificity (Sp), positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) and the accuracy of the initial gastroscopy plus biopsy were analyzed, both overall and according to the initial endoscopist's experience (attending or resident physician). The diagnostic accuracy of the initial and second-look gastroscopies was compared. The number of second endoscopies required to diagnose a new case of malignant gastric ulcer and their cost was calculated, both overall and according to the endoscopist's experience. RESULTS: There were 178 benign ulcers (79%) and 48 malignant ulcers (21%). The initial gastroscopy (S: 87.2%; Sp: 100%; PPV: 100%; PNV: 96.7%; accuracy: 96.7%) was performed by an attending physician in 74% of the patients and by a resident physician in the remaining 26%. Diagnostic accuracy was higher for attending physicians than for residents (98.2% vs. 94.8%; p=0.18). The accuracy of second-look endoscopy was 100%, with a significant improvement when compared with the initial procedure (p=0.035). Three new cases of MALT lymphoma and three new cases of gastric adenocarcinoma were diagnosed and could be treated with curative intent. The number of second gastroscopies required to diagnose a new case of malignant gastric ulcer and their economic cost was: 37.3 (4,675 Euros) for the whole group, 55.2 (6,845 Euros) for attending physicians and 19.3 (2,393 Euros) for residents. CONCLUSIONS: Initial gastroscopy showed high diagnostic accuracy, which was slightly lower when performed by resident physicians. Second-look gastroscopy significantly improved the results, confirming the clinical benefit of this procedure in diagnosing potentially curable malignant lesions. The mean cost of each new diagnosis of malignancy was 4,675 Euros, which was three times lower if the initial gastroscopy was performed by a less experienced endoscopist.


Asunto(s)
Gastroscopía , Neoplasias Gástricas/diagnóstico , Úlcera Gástrica/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/diagnóstico , Adenocarcinoma/economía , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Diagnóstico Precoz , Mucosa Gástrica/patología , Gastroscopía/economía , Gastroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/diagnóstico , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/economía , Linfoma de Células B de la Zona Marginal/patología , Linfoma no Hodgkin/diagnóstico , Linfoma no Hodgkin/economía , Linfoma no Hodgkin/patología , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales , Lesiones Precancerosas/diagnóstico , Lesiones Precancerosas/economía , Lesiones Precancerosas/patología , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad , Neoplasias Gástricas/economía , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Úlcera Gástrica/economía , Úlcera Gástrica/patología
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...