Deciphering the prognostic and therapeutic significance of BAG1 and BAG2 for predicting distinct survival outcome and effects on liposarcoma.

Liposarcoma (LPS) is the second most common kind of soft tissue sarcoma, and a heterogeneous malignant tumor derived from adipose tissue. Up to now, the prognostic value of BAG1 or BAG2 in LPS has not been defined yet. Expression profiling data of LPS patients were collected from TCGA and GEO database. Survival curves were plotted to verify the outcome differences of patients based on BAG1 or BAG2 expression. Univariate and multivariate Cox regression models were used to analyze the prognostic ability of BAG1 or BAG2. Chaperone's regulators BAG1 and BAG2 were identified as prognostic biomarkers for LPS patients, which exhibited distinct expression patterns and survival outcome prediction performances. Patients with high BAG2 expression and/or low BAG1 expression had worse prognosis. Enrichment analysis showed that BAG1 was involved in negative regulation of TGF-ß signaling. Low expression of BAG1 was associated with high abundance of regulatory T cells (Tregs). The 2-gene signature model further confirmed the improved risk assessment performance of BAG1 and BAG2: high risk patients displayed poor prognosis. BAG1 and BAG2 are supposed to be potential prognostic biomarkers for LPS and have impacts on liposarcomagenesis and immune infiltration in distinctive manners, which may function as potential therapy targets (BAG1 agonists/BAG2 inhibitors) for LPS.

Efficacy of surgery in the management of multiple recurrences of retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma is associated with a high risk of recurrence; however, treatment strategies that are more effective than surgery remain to be established. This study aimed to determine the optimal number of surgeries that would be effective for patients with recurrent disease. Furthermore, the improvement in prognosis was evaluated according to the malignancy level. METHODS: The effect of each type of surgery on the prognosis of 118 patients with retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma treated at the Osaka International Cancer Institute between 1997 and 2022 was investigated. Among the 118 patients, 103 underwent initial surgery, while 54 and 30 patients underwent second and third surgeries, respectively. The overall and disease-free survival rates of each group were compared using the Kaplan-Meier method, and the log-rank test was used to determine statistical significance in univariate analysis. 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography (FDG-PET) was used to assess malignancy. Maximum standardized uptake values (SUVmax) of ≥ 4 and < 4 were classified as high and low malignancy, respectively. RESULTS: The first and second surgeries resulted in a significant improvement in the overall survival rate, regardless of the malignancy level (p < 0.001); however, no significant improvement in prognosis was observed after the third surgery (p = 0.077). Low-grade malignancies are associated with a better postoperative prognosis, even in cases of recurrence. In contrast, high-grade malignancies exhibit a reduction in surgical efficacy. CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the importance of considering the tumor malignancy level and the patient's overall condition when deciding whether to perform repeated surgical interventions. Surgical treatment can prolong overall survival, even in patients with recurrence; however, it is advisable to assess malignancy levels when determining the suitability of surgery beyond the second recurrence.

Dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the extremities: a Korean multi-center study of 107 cases.

BACKGROUND: Dedifferentiated liposarcoma of the extremities (DDL-E) is rare in comparison to that of the retroperitoneum. Its clinical features and surgical principle for resection margins at the dedifferentiated and the well-differentiated components are yet to be elucidated. METHODS: This retrospective multi-center study examined patients diagnosed with DDL-E from August 2004 to May 2023 at 5 sarcoma centers. Clinical features, oncologic outcomes, and prognostic factors were analyzed. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were reviewed. The 5-year local recurrence free survival (LRFS), metastasis-free survival (MFS) and disease specific survival (DSS) were 84.7%, 78.6%, and 87.8%, respectively. Other primary malignancies and extrapulmonary metastasis were observed in 27 and 4 patients, respectively. The independent risk factor for local recurrence was R1/2 margin at the dedifferentiated component of the tumor. Metastasis was associated with tumor size in univariate analysis. The independent risk factor for DSS was tumor grade. Previous unplanned excision, de novo presentation, tumor depth, absence of the well-differentiated component, infiltrative border, R1/2 margin at the well-differentiated component were not associated with oncologic outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest study examining DDL-E to-date. Localized DDL-E has low potential for metastasis and carries an excellent prognosis. Other primary malignancy and extrapulmonary metastasis are more frequent in DDL-E, thus close monitoring of other sites during follow-up is recommended. While wide resection margin is the standard surgical approach for DDL-E, further investigation into moderated wide resection margin at the well-differentiated component is warranted.

Clinical features and surgical strategy of retroperitoneal liposarcoma involving the kidney capsule: a retrospective comparative cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Valid and generalizable data on the clinical features and surgical strategies for retroperitoneal liposarcoma (LPS) involving the kidney capsule remain scarce. This study aimed to investigate the clinical characteristics, morbidity, mortality, and long-term survival of patients with retroperitoneal LPS involving the kidney capsule. METHODS: The authors analyzed a prospectively maintained database of patients who underwent surgical resection for retroperitoneal LPS between 2015 and 2020. The patients were categorized into kidney capsule or no kidney capsule groups based on the presence or absence of kidney capsule involvement. A kidney-sparing strategy for retroperitoneal LPS involving the kidney capsule was developed. The primary outcome measure was overall survival (OS). The cumulative event probability curve was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier, and differences between groups using the Log-Rank. RESULTS: The study population consisted of 128 patients-54 with and 74 without kidney capsule involvement. Of these patients, 70 were female (54.7%) and 58 were male (45.3%), with a median age of 55. The median follow-up duration was 35 months. Postoperative morbidity, mortality, length of hospital stay, length of ICU stay, OS, and recurrence-free survival (RFS) did not differ significantly between the groups. Eleven patients developed postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI), and one patient required dialysis during the follow-up period. In multivariable logistic regression analysis, only nephrectomy was independently associated with postoperative AKI. Subgroup analysis of patients with kidney capsule involvement showed that nephrectomy did not improve OS or RFS but significantly decreased postoperative estimated glomerular filtration rate. CONCLUSION: Nephrectomy was associated with an increased risk of postoperative AKI after retroperitoneal LPS resection. A kidney-sparing strategy for retroperitoneal LPS involving the kidney capsule achieved optimal clinical outcomes.

Comprehensive Analysis of a Six-Gene Signature Predicting Survival and Immune Infiltration of Liposarcoma Patients and Deciphering Its Therapeutic Significance.

BACKGROUND: As a common soft tissue sarcoma, liposarcoma (LPS) is a heterogeneous malignant tumor derived from adipose tissue. Due to the high risk of metastasis and recurrence, the prognosis of LPS remains unfavorable. To improve clinical treatment, a robust risk prediction model is essential to evaluate the prognosis of LPS patients. METHODS: By comprehensive analysis of data derived from GEO datasets, differentially expressed genes (DEGs) were obtained. Univariate and Lasso Cox regressions were subsequently employed to reveal distant recurrence-free survival (DRFS)-associated DEGs and develop a prognostic gene signature, which was assessed by Kaplan-Meier survival and ROC curve. GSEA and immune infiltration analyses were conducted to illuminate molecular mechanisms and immune correlations of this model in LPS progression. Furthermore, a correlation analysis was involved to decipher the therapeutic significance of this model for LPS. RESULTS: A six-gene signature was developed to predict DRFS of LPS patients and showed higher precision performance in more aggressive LPS subtypes. Then, a nomogram was further established for clinical application based on this risk model. Via GSEA, the high-risk group was significantly enriched in cell cycle-related pathways. In the LPS microenvironment, neutrophils, memory B cells and resting mast cells exhibited significant differences in cell abundance between high-risk and low-risk patients. Moreover, this model was significantly correlated with therapeutic targets. CONCLUSION: A prognostic six-gene signature was developed and significantly associated with cell cycle pathways and therapeutic target genes, which could provide new insights into risk assessment of LPS progression and therapeutic strategies for LPS patients to improve their prognosis.

Optimizing surgical strategies for retroperitoneal liposarcoma: a comprehensive evaluation of standardized aggressive surgical policies.

BACKGROUND: Retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS) constitutes the majority of retroperitoneal sarcomas. While surgical resection remains the sole curative approach, determining the optimal surgical strategy for RLPS remains elusive. This study addresses the ongoing debate surrounding the optimal surgical strategy for RLPS. METHODS: We recruited 77 patients with RLPS who underwent aggressive surgical policies. Patients were categorized into three surgical subtypes: suprapancreatic RLPS, pancreatic RLPS, and subpancreatic RLPS. Our standardized surgical strategy involved resecting macroscopically uninvolved adjacent organs according to surgical subtypes. We collected clinical, pathological and prognostic data for analyses. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 45.5 months. Overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS) were significantly correlated with multifocal RLPS, pathological subtype, recurrent RLPS and histological grade (P for OS = 0.011, 0.004, 0.010, and < 0.001, P for RFS = 0.004, 0.001, < 0.001, and < 0.001, respectively). The 5-Year Estimate OS of well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS), G1 RLPS, de novo RLPS and unifocal RLPS were 100%, 89.4%, 75.3% and 69.1%, respectively. The distant metastasis rate was 1.4%. The morbidity rates (≥ grade III) for suprapancreatic, pancreatic, and subpancreatic RLPS were 26.7%, 15.6%, and 13.3%, respectively. The perioperative mortality rate is 2.6%. CONCLUSIONS: Standardized aggressive surgical policies demonstrated prognostic benefits for RLPS, particularly for G1 RLPS, WDLPS, unifocal RLPS, and de novo RLPS. This approach effectively balanced considerations of adequate exposure, surgical safety, and thorough removal of all fat tissue. G1 RLPS, WDLPS, unifocal RLPS, and de novo RLPS could be potential indications for aggressive surgical policies.

Surgical outcomes of major vascular resection for retroperitoneal liposarcoma from a high­volume sarcoma center: a propensity score matching analysis.

PURPOSE: Radical resection of retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS) may necessitate vascular resection and reconstruction. The study was conducted to assess surgical outcomes of surgery for RLPS with major vascular involvement. METHODS: Patients with RLPS who underwent surgical resection at the Sarcoma Center of Peking University Cancer Hospital between April 2011 and December 2022 were identified from a prospectively maintained database. Patients were classified into two groups: vascular resection and non-vascular resection groups. A propensity score matching analysis was performed to eliminate baseline differences between the groups. Surgical details and postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Furthermore, prognostic factors for local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were assessed. RESULTS: Overall, 199 patients were identified and the median follow-up period was 48 (interquartile range [IQR] 45-69) months. Vascular resection was performed in 42 (21%) patients, 25 of whom had vascular infiltration. A total of 39 patients had vascular replacement and 3 patients underwent partial resection (side-wall resection). Vascular resection was burdened by higher rates of major morbidity (38% vs. 14%, p < 0.001) and 30-day mortality (7.1% vs. 1.3%, p = 0.005). After propensity-matched analysis, patients who underwent vascular resection had 5-year LRFS and OS rates comparable to those without vascular involvement. Major vascular resection was not an independent risk factor for LRFS or OS. CONCLUSIONS: Although accompanied by increased risks of major morbidity and mortality, the major vascular resection enabled radical resection in patients with advanced RLPS, affording comparable 5-year LRFS and OS rates compared to those who did not.

Explainable machine learning predicts survival of retroperitoneal liposarcoma: A study based on the SEER database and external validation in China.

OBJECTIVE: We have developed explainable machine learning models to predict the overall survival (OS) of retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS) patients. This approach aims to enhance the explainability and transparency of our modeling results. METHODS: We collected clinicopathological information of RLPS patients from The Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database and allocated them into training and validation sets with a 7:3 ratio. Simultaneously, we obtained an external validation cohort from The First Affiliated Hospital of Naval Medical University (Shanghai, China). We performed LASSO regression and multivariate Cox proportional hazards analysis to identify relevant risk factors, which were then combined to develop six machine learning (ML) models: Cox proportional hazards model (Coxph), random survival forest (RSF), ranger, gradient boosting with component-wise linear models (GBM), decision trees, and boosting trees. The predictive performance of these ML models was evaluated using the concordance index (C-index), the integrated cumulative/dynamic area under the curve (AUC), and the integrated Brier score, as well as the Cox-Snell residual plot. We also used time-dependent variable importance, analysis of partial dependence survival plots, and the generation of aggregated survival SHapley Additive exPlanations (SurvSHAP) plots to provide a global explanation of the optimal model. Additionally, SurvSHAP (t) and survival local interpretable model-agnostic explanations (SurvLIME) plots were used to provide a local explanation of the optimal model. RESULTS: The final ML models are consisted of six factors: patient's age, gender, marital status, surgical history, as well as tumor's histopathological classification, histological grade, and SEER stage. Our prognostic model exhibits significant discriminative ability, particularly with the ranger model performing optimally. In the training set, validation set, and external validation set, the AUC for 1, 3, and 5 year OS are all above 0.83, and the integrated Brier scores are consistently below 0.15. The explainability analysis of the ranger model also indicates that histological grade, histopathological classification, and age are the most influential factors in predicting OS. CONCLUSIONS: The ranger ML prognostic model exhibits optimal performance and can be utilized to predict the OS of RLPS patients, offering valuable and crucial references for clinical physicians to make informed decisions in advance.

Current unmet needs in locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma, the relevance of progression-free survival as clinical endpoint, and expectations for future clinical trial design: an international Delphi consensus report.

BACKGROUND: Locally advanced (unresectable) or metastatic dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLPS) is a common presentation of liposarcoma. Despite established diagnostic and treatment guidelines for DDLPS, critical clinical gaps remain driven by diagnostic challenges, symptom burden and the lack of targeted, safe and effective treatments. The objective of this study was to gather expert opinions from Europe and the United States on the management, unmet needs and expectations for clinical trial design as well as the value of progression-free survival (PFS) in this disease. Other aims included raising awareness and educate key stakeholders across healthcare systems. MATERIALS AND METHODS: An international panel of 12 sarcoma key opinion leaders (KOLs) was recruited. The study consisted of two rounds of surveys with pre-defined statements. Experts scored each statement on a 9-point Likert scale. Consensus agreement was defined as ≥75% of experts scoring a statement with ≥7. Revised statements were discussed in a consensus meeting. RESULTS: Consensus was reached on 43 of 55 pre-defined statements across disease burden, treatment paradigm, unmet needs, value of PFS and its association with overall survival (OS), and cross-over trial design. Twelve statements were deprioritised or merged with other statements. There were no statements where experts disagreed. CONCLUSION: This study constitutes the first international Delphi panel on DDLPS. It aimed to explore KOL perception of the disease burden and unmet need in DDLPS, the value of PFS, and its potential translation to OS benefit, as well as the relevance of a cross-over trial design for DDLPS therapies. Results indicate an alignment across Europe and the United States regarding DDLPS management, unmet needs, and expectations for clinical trials. Raising awareness of critical clinical gaps in relation to DDLPS can contribute to improving patient outcomes and supporting the development of innovative treatments.

Short- and long-term post-nephrectomy outcomes for retroperitoneal liposarcoma from a high-volume sarcoma center: a propensity score matching analysis.

BACKGROUND: Multivisceral en bloc resection with the ipsilateral kidney is commonly performed in patients with retroperitoneal liposarcoma (RLPS). We evaluated the effect of nephrectomy on short- and long-term outcomes in patients with RLPS. METHODS: Data from a prospectively maintained database of the Peking University Cancer Hospital Sarcoma Center between April 2011 and August 2022 were analyzed. We classified the RLPS patients who underwent surgery into nephrectomy group (NP) and non-nephrectomy group (non-NP). Patients were matched using a 1:1 propensity score to eliminate baseline differences between groups. Postoperative renal function outcomes, major morbidity, and mortality were analyzed to compare short-term outcomes after nephrectomy. Differences in local recurrence-free survival (LRFS) and overall survival (OS) were compared by Kaplan-Meier analysis with respect to oncological benefits. RESULTS: In the matched cohort, patients in the NP group had significantly higher postoperative eGFR and CKD stages, but none required dialysis. Patients between NP and non-NP had a comparable major morbidity (p = 0.820) and 60-day mortality (p = 0.475). Patients in the NP group had a higher 5-year LRFS rates than those in the non-NP group (34.5 vs. 17.8%, p = 0.015), and similar 5-year OS rates (52.4 vs. 47.1%, p = 0.401). Nephrectomy was an independent risk factor for LRFS, but not for major morbidity or OS. CONCLUSIONS: RLPS resection with nephrectomy is related to a mild progression of renal impairment; however, dialysis is rare. En bloc nephrectomy for complete resection of RLPS is safe and improves local control.

Surgically treated pelvic liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma: The effect of tumor size on cancer-specific survival.

INTRODUCTION: In soft tissue pelvic liposarcoma and leiomyosarcoma, it is unknown whether a specific tumor size cut-off may help to better predict prognosis, defined as cancer-specific survival (CSS). We tested whether different tumor size cut-offs, could improve CSS prediction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Surgically treated non-metastatic soft tissue pelvic sarcoma patients were identified (Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results 2004-2019). Kaplan-Meier plots, univariable and multivariable Cox-regression models and receiver operating characteristic-derived area under the curve (AUC) estimates were used. RESULTS: Overall, 672 (65 %) liposarcoma (median tumor size 11 cm, interquartile range [IQR] 7-16) and 367 (35 %) leiomyosarcoma (median tumor size 8 cm, IQR 5-12) patients were identified. The p-value derived ideal tumor size cut-off was 17.1 cm, in liposarcoma and 7.0 cm, in leiomyosarcoma. In liposarcoma, according to p-value derived cut-off, five-year CSS rates were 92 vs 83 % (≤17.1 vs > 17.1 cm). This cut-off represented an independent predictor of CSS and improved prognostic ability from 83.8 to 86.8 % (Δ = 3 %). Similarly, among previously established cut-offs (5 vs 10 vs 15 cm), also 15 cm represented an independent predictor of CSS and improved prognostic ability from 83.8 to 87.0 % (Δ = 3.2 %). In leiomyosarcoma, according to p-value derived cut-off, five-year CSS rates were 86 vs 55 % (≤7.0 vs > 7.0 cm). This cut-off represented an independent predictor of CSS and improved prognostic ability from 68.6 to 76.5 % (Δ = 7.9 %). CONCLUSIONS: In liposarcoma, the p-value derived tumor size cut-off was 17.1 cm vs 7.0 cm, in leiomyosarcoma. In both histologic subtypes, these cut-offs exhibited the optimal statistical characteristics (univariable, multivariable and AUC analyses). In liposarcoma, the 15 cm cut-off represented a valuable alternative.

The effect of married status on cancer-specific mortality in nonmetastatic pelvic liposarcoma patients according to sex.

BACKGROUND: In nonmetastatic pelvic liposarcoma patients, it is unknown whether married status is associated with better cancer-control outcome defined as cancer-specific mortality (CSM). We addressed this knowledge gap and hypothesized that married status is associated with lower CSM rates in both male and female patients. METHODS: Within the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database (2000-2020), nonmetastatic pelvic liposarcoma patients were identified. Kaplan-Meier plots and univariable and multivariable Cox regression models (CRMs) predicting CSM according to marital status were used in the overall cohort and in male and female subgroups. RESULTS: Of 1078 liposarcoma patients, 764 (71%) were male and 314 (29%) female. Of 764 male patients, 542 (71%) were married. Conversely, of 314 female patients, 192 (61%) were married. In the overall cohort, 5-year cancer-specific mortality-free survival (CSM-FS) rates were 89% for married versus 83% for unmarried patients (Δ = 6%). In multivariable CRMs, married status did not independently predict lower CSM (hazard ratio [HR]: 0.74, p = 0.06). In males, 5-year CSM-FS rates were 89% for married versus 86% for unmarried patients (Δ = 3%). In multivariable CRMs, married status did not independently predict lower CSM (HR: 0.85, p = 0.4). In females, 5-year CSM-FS rates were 88% for married versus 79% for unmarried patients (Δ = 9%). In multivariable CRMs, married status independently predicted lower CSM (HR: 0.58, p = 0.03). CONCLUSIONS: In nonmetastatic pelvic liposarcoma patients, married status independently predicted lower CSM only in female patients. In consequence, unmarried female patients should ideally require more assistance and more frequent follow-up than their married counterparts.

Retroperitoneal sarcoma: a 10-year follow-up analysis using hospital-based cancer registry data in Japan.

OBJECTIVES: We sought clinical characteristics, survival outcomes, and prognostic factors for overall survival of retroperitoneal sarcoma in Japan. METHODS: A Japanese hospital-based cancer registry database with a pivotal 10-year follow-up was used to identify and enroll patients, registered from 106 institutions, diagnosed with retroperitoneal sarcoma in 2008-2009. Treating hospitals were divided by hospital care volume; high-volume hospitals and low-volume hospitals were defined as ≥ 4 and < 4 cases/year, respectively. RESULTS: A total of 91 men and 97 women were included, with a median age of 64 years. The most common histological type was liposarcoma in 101 patients, followed by leiomyosarcoma in 38 patients. The 5-year and 10-year overall survival rates were 44.1 and 28.3%. The majority of patients (n = 152, 80.9%) were treated at low-volume hospitals. High-volume hospital patients had higher 10-year overall survival rates than low-volume hospital patients (51.2% vs 23.2%, P = 0.026). Multivariate analysis revealed age over 60 years, treatment in low-volume hospitals and chemotherapy were independent predictors of unfavorable survival while treatment with surgery was an independent predictor of favorable survival. CONCLUSIONS: The possibility of surgical removal was suggested to be the most important prognostic factor for retroperitoneal sarcoma. Better survival was shown in patients treated at high-volume hospitals in our series.

Resection Status Does Not Impact Recurrence in Well-Differentiated Liposarcoma of the Extremity.

BACKGROUND: Well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDLPS) is a low-grade soft tissue sarcoma with a propensity for local recurrence. The necessity of obtaining microscopically free surgical margins (R0) to minimize local recurrence is not clear. This study evaluates recurrence-free survival (RFS) of extremity WDLPS in relation to resection margin status. METHODS: A retrospective review of adult patients with primary extremity WDLPS at seven US institutions from 2000 to 2016 was performed. Patients with recurrent tumors or incomplete resection (R2) were excluded. Clinicopathologic factors were analyzed to assess impact on local RFS. RESULTS: 97 patients with primary extremity WDLPS were identified. The majority of patients had deep, lower extremity tumors. Mean tumor size was 18.2±8.9cm. Patients were treated with either radical (76.3%) or excisional (23.7%) resections; 64% had R0 and 36% had microscopically positive (R1) resection margins. Ten patients received radiation therapy with no difference in receipt of radiation between R0 vs R1 groups. Thirteen patients (13%) developed a local recurrence with no difference in RFS between R0 vs R1 resection. Five-year RFS was 59.5% for R0 vs 85.2% for R1. Only one patient died of disease after developing dedifferentiation and distant metastasis despite originally having an R0 resection. DISCUSSION: In this large multi-institutional study of surgical resection of extremity WDLPS, microscopically positive margins were not associated with an increased risk of recurrence. Positive microscopic margin resection for extremity WDLPS may yield similar rates of local control while avoiding a radical approach to obtain microscopically negative margins.

Dedifferentiation within well-differentiated liposarcoma of the extremity or trunk: Implications for clinical management.

BACKGROUND: In extremity or trunk liposarcoma, the implications of a dedifferentiated (DD) component within a well-differentiated (WD) tumor are unclear. We evaluated outcomes after surgery and identified potential predictors of survival in these patients compared to those with an entirely WD tumor. METHODS: Retrospective data were collected for patients who underwent complete resection from 2009 to 2019. Cumulative incidences of local recurrence (LR) and distant metastasis (DM) were calculated, and overall survival (OS) was estimated. Associations between OS and clinicopathologic variables were evaluated by univariable models. RESULTS: A total of 210 patients with MDM2-verified tumors were studied, including 58 (27.6%) with DD. In primary disease, LR occurred only in DD and worse OS was observed versus WD (p < 0.001). In recurrent disease, the LR incidences were similar between WD and DD (p = 0.559); however, worse OS persisted in DD (p = 0.004). The incidence of DM was extremely low (3.8%) and limited to DD. Higher grade (p < 0.001) and DD size (p = 0.043), but not overall tumor size were associated with worse OS. CONCLUSIONS: In extremity or trunk liposarcoma, the presence of DD leads to significantly worse outcomes in both primary and recurrence diseases. Further study is needed to determine if these patients benefit from adjunct therapies (e.g., radiation).

Retroperitoneal Dedifferentiated Liposarcoma.

OBJECTIVES: We aimed to test the hypothesis that in retroperitoneal dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDLS) the presence of the dedifferentiated (DD) component at the resection margin is associated with adverse outcome. METHODS: We retrospectively searched the archive for primary resections of retroperitoneal DDLS performed at our institution between 1990 and 2017. Slides were rereviewed for diagnosis, Fédération Nationale des Centres de Lutte Contre le Cancer grade, myogenic differentiation, and the presence of the well-differentiated (WD) or DD component at the resection margin. The medical records were reviewed for patient age, sex, tumor size, tumor focality, adjuvant/neoadjuvant therapy, local recurrence, distant metastases, local recurrence-free survival (LRFS), overall survival (OS), and follow-up duration. RESULTS: The presence of the DD component at the resection margin was associated with worse LRFS compared with cases without the DD component at the margin (P = .002). However, OS was not significantly affected (P = .11). CONCLUSIONS: LRFS is significantly shorter in cases with the DD component at the margin compared with cases without DD tumor at the margin, while there is no association with OS. We recommend reporting the presence or absence of DD tumor at the margin in retroperitoneal DDLS, as it adds meaningful prognostic information.

Pharmacotherapy for liposarcoma: current and emerging synthetic treatments.

Liposarcomas are rare tumors arising from adipocytic tissue and accounting for approximately 15-20% of all soft tissue sarcomas. Liposarcoma can be further classified into histopathological subtypes with variable chemosensitivity according to subtype. Decisions regarding management should be made on an individual basis, but surgery for localized disease and systemic chemotherapy remain the mainstay of treatment. Currently, only doxorubicin and trabectedin have robust Phase III data to support their use in the management of advanced liposarcoma. However, in the subgroup analysis of a Phase III trial comparing eribulin with dacarbazine, there was a greater than 7-month improvement in median overall survival in those treated with eribulin. There are also promising results from emerging studies in novel and targeted agents for the treatment of liposarcoma.

Survival analysis and treatment strategies for limb liposarcoma patients with metastasis at presentation.

ABSTRACT: Limited data exist on patients with limb liposarcoma (LLS) with metastasis at presentation Moreover, the potential prognostic factors of this patient population are poorly documented because of its rarity. Therefore, we conducted this study to evaluate the clinicopathologic characteristics and prognostic factors for patients with metastatic LLS.All patients with LLS with metastasis at presentation from 1975 to 2016 were identified by using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. The following clinical data were derived from this clinical database: age, sex, histologic grade, subtype, size of tumor, surgery, radiotherapy, chemotherapy, vital status, cause of death, and survival duration. The Kaplan-Meier method was performed to calculate median survival time and draw survivorship curves. Cox-proportional hazards regression model was used to reveal the statistical independence between various variables.The present study collected 184 cases from SEER database for survival analysis. Mean age was 57.8 years with 63.6% (n = 117) men. The 3-year overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) rates of this population were 27.8% and 30.1%, respectively. Univariate analysis revealed that age, tumor grade, and surgery were significantly correlated with survival. Sex and tumor size did not reach significant predictor status of survival. Multivariate analysis revealed that age at diagnosis <60, low tumor grade, and local surgery were significantly correlated with improved OS and CSS.Patients with LLS with metastasis at diagnosis experienced quite poor prognosis. Currently, surgery for the primary tumor significantly prolonged the survival of those patients, whereas chemotherapy and radiotherapy need to be further confirmed.

Survivorship and prognostic factors for pleomorphic liposarcoma: a population-based study.

BACKGROUND: Pleomorphic liposarcoma is the least common but most aggressive subtype of liposarcoma. Very few studies have presented data on pleomorphic liposarcoma specifically, often including a limited number of cases and short-term follow-up. As a result, the survivorship and prognostic characteristics of this tumor remain incompletely identified. STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: Cross-sectional analysis of the Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results database (1996-2015). RESULTS: Overall survival for the entire series was 54% (95% confidence interval [CI], 49-58%) and 40% (95% CI, 35-45%) at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Disease-specific survival for the entire series was 60% (95% CI, 56-65%) and 53% (95% CI, 48-58%) at 5 and 10 years, respectively. Patients who survived 10 years or more were more likely to die of events unrelated to pleomorphic liposarcoma. Univariate and multivariate analysis demonstrated that not receiving cancer-directed surgery was an independent poor prognostic factor. Older age (≥ 65 years old) was associated with worse overall survival but not disease-specific survival. Tumor stage and radiotherapy showed different impact on survival depending on tumor size. In comparison to localized staged tumors, regional stage only predicts poor survival in patients with tumor size less than 5 cm, while distant stage is an independent worse prognosis factor. Radiotherapy only benefits patients with tumor size larger than 10 cm. These results were confirmed in competing risk analysis. CONCLUSION: Survival rates of patients with pleomorphic liposarcoma has not changed over the past 20 years. Patients with distant stage have poor prognosis; regional stage indicates worse survival in patients with tumor size less than 5 cm. Receiving surgery could prolong the survival, while radiotherapy only benefits patients with large tumor size (> 10 cm). Older age is associated with poor overall survival but not disease-specific survival. Routine patient surveillance following initial diagnosis should at least be 10 years for pleomorphic liposarcoma.

Liposarcoma in children and young adults: a clinicopathologic and molecular study of 23 cases in one of the largest institutions of China.

The incidence of pediatric liposarcoma is rare and most published cases lack systematic genetic analyses. We present clinicopathologic and genetic features of 23 liposarcomas aged <22 years. The study cohort comprised 10 males and 13 females (M:F=1:1.3) aged 11-21 years (median 17 years). The tumors predominantly occurred at the extremities (16/23; 69.6%), followed by the head/neck (2/23; 8.7%), chest (2/23; 8.7%), waist (2/23, 8.7%), and retroperitoneum (1/23; 4.3%). The tumor subtypes were sixteen myxoid liposarcoma (ML), one well-differentiated liposarcoma (WDL), two dedifferentiated liposarcoma (DDL), one pleomorphic liposarcoma (PL), and three myxoid pleomorphic liposarcoma (MPL) cases. Fluorescence in situ hybridization analysis identified MDM2/CDK4 amplification in all WDL/DDL cases (3/3; 100%) and DDIT3 rearrangement in all ML cases (13/13; 100%). Whole-exome sequencing indicated that one PL case and one MPL case exhibited RB1 loss. The two tested MPL cases had TP53 mutation and one of them harbored a TP53 germline mutation. Follow-up information was available for 20 patients (20/23; 87.0%) with a median follow-up duration of 42.5 months (range, 13-120 months). Three patients exhibited tumor progression (3/20;15.0%). Seventeen patients (17/20; 85.0%) survived with no evidence of disease. One MPL case (1/20; 5.0%) died of the disease. In conclusion, despite some overlaps, the occurrence, distribution of subtype, and prognosis of liposarcoma are overall different in children and adults. Most MLs and ALT/WDL/DDLs showed similar genetic aberrations with adult counterparts. Molecular features of MPL overlapped with those of conventional PL. The genetic characteristics including Tp53 status of MPL need further investigation.