RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Exacerbated by a global pandemic, healthcare organizations have become increasingly isolated spaces and healthcare professionals suffer from threats to psychological safety, occupational burnout, and attrition. Restorative justice (RJ) is a human- and community-centered framework used to foster connections and promote healing among groups and has recently been implemented in healthcare settings. It may serve as a novel approach to promote the well-being of healthcare professionals. METHOD: In this article, we describe the conceptual underpinnings of RJ, briefly reviewing the existing literature supporting restorative approaches and exploring its early applications within healthcare. We provide a case example of our own efforts to implement an RJ program to support healthcare professionals. RESULTS: Using our own program as reference, we describe how we have monitored engagement to guide program improvement and utilized participant feedback to understand impact. DISCUSSION: RJ offers unique potential for promoting a safe workplace for healthcare professionals and advancing inclusion in medicine. With regularly implemented restorative practices, we hope to effect lasting change within our institution (i.e., improved retention), which should be explored with future studies. In order to improve the health of diverse communities we serve, we must also prioritize the well-being of our own healthcare communities. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).
Asunto(s)
Justicia Social , Humanos , Personal de Salud/psicología , COVID-19/psicología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Agotamiento Profesional/prevención & control , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/normasRESUMEN
Ensuring the safety and health of workers in this country, who are employed at millions of workplaces presenting a dizzying array of hazards, is beyond daunting. And yet, it is exceptionally important, because the lives and well-being of countless workers, and their families, hang in the balance. Every day, workers are maimed or die of their workplace injuries or occupational illnesses. These outcomes are unacceptable. Agencies must use all the means at their disposal to keep workers safe and healthy in their workplaces. This paper addresses this challenge through the lens of strategic enforcement, with the goal of maximizing enforcement effectiveness to save lives and limbs.First, we examine how, under the Occupational Safety and Health Act, federal and state enforcement schemes are designed to interact. Next, we dive into the impressive array of strategic enforcement tools that are available to federal, state, and local enforcers, and we observe that many of them are either unrecognized or underutilized. We emphasize that these are all significant, because, given our limited enforcement resources, we need to use every tool we can muster-from strategic targeting, to enterprise-wide enforcement, to heightening deterrence through more robust penalty assessments and publicity, to valuing and making the most of partnerships and coenforcement efforts with a wide range of organizations and agencies. And we need to engage in a process of continual evaluation and improvement of our tools and assets, always striving to maximize our enforcement leverage in aid of worker safety and health. Finally, we examine an impressive list of initiatives state and local governments have taken, beyond what the OSH Act mandates, in their efforts to go the extra mile for the safety of the workers in their states and cities. These examples are intended to inspire federal, state and local agencies to do the same, or, hopefully, even better. The stakes are high. Workers deserve to work in safe and healthy environments. This paper is intended to provide practical ways in which state and local agencies can better-and potentially far better-satisfy that obligation.
Asunto(s)
Salud Laboral , Humanos , Salud Laboral/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud Laboral/normas , Estados Unidos , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Lugar de Trabajo/legislación & jurisprudencia , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/legislación & jurisprudencia , Administración de la Seguridad/organización & administración , Administración de la Seguridad/normas , Administración de la Seguridad/legislación & jurisprudenciaRESUMEN
Workplace gender discrimination as perceived by women in nursing, is currently under researched. The aim of this article is to outline the development and validation of a scale designed to measure the perception of workplace gender discrimination for women nurses. The instrument was developed following a three-stage process, consistent with recommendations for scale development. Twenty-nine items were derived from two comprehensive literature reviews and interviews with 10 women nurses. Exploratory factor analysis (principal axis factoring) with varimax rotation was conducted for identifying the dimensions underlying the data set. All 29 items loaded onto a factor. Each factor included at least four items and all item loadings were well above the acceptable minimum value (> 0.40). The four factors collectively account for 71.27% of the total variance. Cronbach's alpha of the 29 items (0.964) showed good internal consistency. It is our hope that this research tool will not only be used within nursing, but also with some modification, in other women dominated professions.
Asunto(s)
Psicometría , Sexismo , Lugar de Trabajo , Humanos , Femenino , Sexismo/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Psicometría/instrumentación , Psicometría/métodos , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Percepción , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Análisis FactorialRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to examine the national impact of workplace factors during the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on mental health experienced by non-physician healthcare workers (HCWs). METHODS: This study consisted of an online sample of non-physician HCWs across the United States, including nurses, medical assistants, and physician assistants. The survey consisted of 93 questions, which included the Perceived Stress Scale, the Center for Epidemiological Studies-Depression (CESD-10) scale, questions about COVID-19 vaccination, sources of trusted information, and questions about work environment and training during the COVID-19 pandemic. Descriptive statistics were used to evaluate associations. RESULTS: In the final sample (N = 220), (81.8%) reported receiving at least one dose of a COVID vaccine. Most respondents trusted the CDC's information on the SARS-CoV-2 virus and COVID-19 disease. Several workplace-related factors that occurred during the pandemic were associated with moderate to high levels of perceived stress, fatigue, and higher risk of developing depression. In particular, concerns about exposing others, experiencing discrimination related to their jobs, and caring for patients who died from COVID-19 were associated with increased perceived stress, depression, and fatigue. CONCLUSIONS: The importance of planning by healthcare facilities should include planning for workplace factors associated with poor mental health among all HCWs.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Depresión , Fatiga , Personal de Salud , Estrés Psicológico , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Depresión/psicología , Depresión/epidemiología , Depresión/etiología , Personal de Salud/psicología , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Fatiga/psicología , Fatiga/epidemiología , Fatiga/etiología , Pandemias , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Lugar de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Nursing advocacy is a critical component of nursing practice. An exemplar of how nurses can advocate for an enhanced quality of nursing work environment and safe staffing is provided. Garnering state and national resources can assist in impacting statewide change. [J Contin Educ Nurs. 2024;55(11):520-522.].
Asunto(s)
Personal de Enfermería en Hospital , Admisión y Programación de Personal , Humanos , Admisión y Programación de Personal/normas , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Rol de la Enfermera , Seguridad del Paciente/normas , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , LiderazgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: to adapt and validate the content of the Healthy Work Environment Assessment Tool for Brazilian culture, and evaluate the practical aspects of its application. METHODS: methodological study that followed six stages: translation; synthesis; back translation; content validation by a group of experts, pre-testing and approval of the process by the author of the original instrument. RESULTS: the first three stages were carried out by contracted companies. In the committee, two items and the title of a subscale were evaluated in a second round, when consensus was reached among experts. In the pre-test, more than 93% of professionals agreed that the tool was easy to understand. The average completion time was 8.53 minutes. The American Association of Critical-Care Nurses authorized publication of the results. CONCLUSIONS: the adaptation of the tool to Brazilian culture was completed following the adopted framework. In addition to the evidence of content validity, the tool appears promising for managerial use.
Asunto(s)
Comparación Transcultural , Lugar de Trabajo , Brasil , Humanos , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Traducción , Psicometría/métodos , Psicometría/instrumentación , Salud Laboral/normas , Condiciones de TrabajoRESUMEN
Workers' perception of control over work is a key construct in the relationship between the psychosocial work environment and health. While exposure to low job control has been prospectively linked to poor mental health including depression and anxiety, there is less research examining the impact of prolonged exposure to low job control on mental health. Data from 5054 employed men from 2013 to 2021 in the Australian Longitudinal Study on Male Health was used to examine persistent and intermittent low job control and subsequent major depression symptoms. Persistent low job control was based on consecutive self-reports of low job control over waves 1 and 2. Combinations of low and high job control were classified as intermittent exposure and continuous high job control exposure over both waves was classified as persistent high job control. Major depression symptoms, derived from the Patient Health Questionnaire-9, was measured in wave 3. Generalised linear models and augmented inverse probability weighting were undertaken. There was a strong stepwise relationship between low job control and major depression. Compared to persistent high job control, intermittent low job control was associated with an increased risk of subsequent major depression symptoms by 32% (RR 1.32, 95% CI 0.82, 2.15); and persistent low job control by 103% (RR 2.03, 95% CI 1.21, 3.41). Compared to men exposed to persistent high job control, the average treatment effect for persistent low job control was 0.036 (95%CI 0.014, 0.058) and intermittent low job control 0.019 (95%CI 0.006, 0.032) equating to a risk ratio of 2.46 (95%CI 1.43, 3.50) and 1.79 (95% CI 1.14, 2.45) respectively. This study's findings have implications for public health and occupational policies, as they underscore the importance of reducing prolonged exposure to low job control to protect against the risk of major depression in the working population.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Humanos , Masculino , Australia/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/epidemiología , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Longitudinales , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Empleo/psicología , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: During the COVID-19 pandemic, low-wage public-facing frontline workers (FLWs), such as grocery store clerks, were required to monitor retail customers and enforce COVID-19 protocols. OBJECTIVE: This analysis aimed to examine FLWs experiences of enforcing COVID-19 pandemic measures. METHODS: Between September 2020 and March 2021, in Ontario and Quebec (Canada), we conducted in-depth interviews about customer-related work and health risks with FLWs who interacted with the public (nâ=â40) and their supervisors (nâ=â16). Using a lens of situational analysis, verbatim transcripts were coded according to recurring topics. RESULTS: We found that enforcing public health measures placed already-precarious workers in difficult occupational health circumstances. Enforcement of measures created additional workplace responsibilities, stress, and exposed them to potentially negative reactions from customers. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions to better support these workers and improved methods of protection are discussed.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Pandemias , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , COVID-19/prevención & control , Quebec/epidemiología , Ontario/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , SARS-CoV-2 , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Entrevistas como Asunto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Salud Laboral , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Chronic noncommunicable diseases (NCDs) account for major disability and premature mortality worldwide, with low- and middle-income countries being disproportionately burdened. Given the negative impact of NCDs on employee performance and work productivity, there is a rising need for stakeholders to identify effective workplace solutions that can improve employee health outcomes. As the workplace becomes more dispersed post pandemic, digital behavioral coaching offers a scalable, personalized, and cost-effective method of managing chronic disease risk factors among employees. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the impact of a digital behavioral coaching program on year-to-year changes in employee health status in a cohort of Indonesian employees. METHODS: This retrospective real-world exploratory analysis of secondary health data followed 774 employees of an Indonesian company who completed company-sponsored health screenings between 2021 and 2022 and were given access to Naluri (Naluri Hidup Sdn Bhd), a holistic digital therapeutics platform offering digital behavioral health coaching and self-help tools. Participants were retrospectively classified as those who received active coaching (n=177), passive coaching (n=108), and no coaching (n=489). Linear mixed-effects models were used to evaluate the year-to-year changes in health outcomes across the 3 employee groups, with post hoc analyses evaluating within-group differences between the 2 time points and between-group differences at follow-up. RESULTS: Significant time×group interaction effects were detected for body weight, BMI, hemoglobin A1c, low-density lipoprotein, total cholesterol, and systolic and diastolic blood pressure. Post hoc pairwise comparisons revealed significant improvements in hemoglobin A1c (mean difference [Mdiff]=-0.14, P=.008), high-density lipoprotein (Mdiff=+2.14, P<.001), and total cholesterol (Mdiff=-11.45, P<.001) for employees in the Active Coaching group between 2021 and 2022, with the other 2 groups reporting deteriorations in multiple health outcomes throughout the 2 time points. At follow-up, those who received active coaching between 2021 and 2022 reported significantly lower body weight (P<.001), BMI (P=.001), low-density lipoprotein (P=.045), and total cholesterol (P<.001) than the No Coaching group. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates real-world outcomes and implications supporting the use of workplace digital behavioral coaching in improving employee health status. Given the rising burden of NCDs in the Southeast Asian region, our findings underscore the role that workplace digital health interventions can play in preventing and managing chronic disease risk factors.
Asunto(s)
Tutoría , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Tutoría/métodos , Tutoría/estadística & datos numéricos , Tutoría/normas , Indonesia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estado de Salud , Salud Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Many nurses join the profession because they have altruistic intentions, but some nurses experience barriers to acting on altruistic intentions which may be a source of job dissatisfaction or burnout. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to evaluate construct validity, internal consistency, and convergence reliability of the Nursing Altruistic Execution Scale (NAES), a novel instrument assessing the perceived ability to help others through work. METHODS: The NAES was developed based upon a literature review examining altruistic behavior as a motivator for nursing work, with expert feedback for instrument refinement. Participants completed the NAES, Copenhagen Burnout Inventory Work-Related Burnout Scale, and Satisfaction of Employees in Health Care Survey. Exploratory factor analysis examined construct validity and factor loadings. Confirmatory factor analysis verified consistency in factor structure. Linear regression assessed for convergence reliability with burnout and job satisfaction. RESULTS: The sample included 843 acute care hospital nurses surveyed in January-March 2023. Exploratory factor analysis revealed a two-factor solution, named altruistic engagement with work and workplace barriers to altruism. Nine instrument items were retained and demonstrated strong internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.79). There was a significant relationship between both factors of the NAES and both burnout and job satisfaction, demonstrating that greater altruistic execution is associated with lower burnout and greater job satisfaction. CONCLUSION: Preliminary findings support the use of the NAES as a valid and reliable scale. Findings show there is correlation between altruistic intentions and burnout. Interventions aimed at enhancing altruistic execution may reduce nurse burnout and thereby improve retention.
Asunto(s)
Altruismo , Agotamiento Profesional , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Psicometría , Humanos , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Psicometría/instrumentación , Psicometría/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Análisis FactorialRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aimed to identify workstation factors influencing work-related musculoskeletal disorders (WMSDs) among information technology (IT) professionals in Indonesia. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted among 150 IT workers at small-enterprise companies who were randomly selected across East Java, Indonesia. The data were modeled using multiple linear regression, with a 95% level of confidence for determining statistical significance. RESULTS: The respondents reported that the neck had the highest level of discomfort and was the most at risk of WMSDs, followed by the lower back, right shoulder, and upper back. Screen use duration (p=0.040) was associated with whole-body WMSDs, along with seat width (p=0.059), armrest (p=0.027), monitor (p=0.046), and a combined telephone and monitor score (p=0.028). Meanwhile, the factors significantly related to the risk of WMSDs in the hands and wrist were working period (p=0.039), night shift (p=0.024), backrest (p=0.008), and mouse score (p=0.032). CONCLUSIONS: Occupational safety authorities, standards-setting departments, and policymakers should prioritize addressing the risk factors for WMSDs among IT professionals.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas , Enfermedades Profesionales , Humanos , Indonesia/epidemiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/epidemiología , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/etiología , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tecnología de la Información/estadística & datos numéricos , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Lugar de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Ergonomía , Postura , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Labor unions are associated with better wages, improved working conditions, and greater worker empowerment, which may result in better health. However, less is known about the relationship between unionization and health among U.S. healthcare workers, whether the relationship differs among racially diverse workers, and how much control over workplace schedules and location mediates the relationship. METHODS: We analyzed a cross-sectional survey of a nationally representative sample of 3000 U.S. healthcare workers collected from March 14 through April 5, 2023. Using ordinal logistic regression, we evaluated whether unionized healthcare workers had better self-rated health (SRH) than their nonunionized counterparts and examined potential differences between White and racially minoritized respondents. We quantified the mediation percentage explained by control over one's schedule and workplace location in the total and stratified samples using Karlson, Holm, and Breen decomposition analysis. RESULTS: Over a third (36.1%) of racially minoritized respondents were unionized, compared to 22.3% of White respondents. Among racially minoritized workers, a greater share of unionized workers reported excellent health (40.6% vs. 21.8%) than their nonunionized counterparts. In confounder-adjusted ordinal logistic regression analyses, labor union membership was associated with better SRH overall, with a stronger association for racially minoritized workers. Among White healthcare workers, control over workplace arrangements explained 68.1% of the union membership and SRH relationship. For racially minoritized workers, control over workplace arrangements partially mediated the relationship, explaining 17.4% of the variation, suggesting that labor unions may impact health through additional pathways for these workers. CONCLUSIONS: This study provides empirical evidence of the relationship between labor union membership and health among U.S. healthcare workers. We demonstrate that control over schedules and location is an important mechanism by which unionization may protect healthcare workers' health. Among racially diverse healthcare workers, labor unions may play an important role in health through various pathways beyond workplace control.
Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud , Sindicatos , Humanos , Sindicatos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Personal de Salud/psicología , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Estados Unidos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Estado de Salud , Autoinforme , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupos Raciales/psicologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Destructive interpersonal relationships at work may result in negative feelings among employees that hinder personal and organizational productivity, which may also result in high levels of job disengagement and subsequent career turnover intentions. Leaders play a key role in creating work environments conducive to optimizing employee performance, organizational culture, and workplace well-being. Social support, which may include support from one's supervisor, colleagues, and loved ones, has been shown to reduce strains and perceived stressors at work. In the Army, the Judge Advocate General's Corps (JAGC) personnel have a unique position as lawyers and legal staff and have been shown to have high rates of burnout. To promote soldier health, well-being, and career longevity, it is important to understand the impact interpersonal relationships have on career intentions. The current study assesses the relationship between perceived leadership effectiveness and career intentions as moderated by burnout measured by job disengagement and team care activities in JAGC personnel. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The Walter Reed Army Institute of Research conducted a survey to understand factors affecting the well-being of the JAGC's soldier and civilian personnel as requested by the JAGC. JAGC personnel were administered several questionnaires covering a range of work and mental health topics. Job disengagement, career intentions, team care activities, and general leadership were assessed. A total of 831 JAGC personnel completed the survey, the majority (92%) of which were soldiers. Among soldiers, first lieutenants and captains (â¼49%) were the majority. The sample largely consisted of men (â¼63%), White individuals (â¼76%), married individuals, (70%), and individuals with graduate degrees (â¼81%). RESULTS: One in four participants (â¼29%) experienced high levels of disengagement, with their work. Over two-thirds of participants agreed that their immediate supervisor is an effective leader. When asked about career intentions, the majority of JAGC participants (54%) indicated that they would probably or definitely stay in the JAGC until retirement. Ordinal logistic regressions were conducted to assess the relationship between perceived leader effectiveness and career intentions, assessing the main effects of job disengagement and team care activities, and the interactions between those variables. No interaction effects were found to be significant, but main effects for perceived leader effectiveness were significant. CONCLUSIONS: JAGC personnel reported higher levels of job disengagement for those with career intentions that were undecided or definitely leaving the JAGC after their current obligation. Those who were engaged in more team care activities had lower levels of disengagement. While the majority of the JAGC participants indicated career intentions to stay in the JAGC until retirement, increasing perceived effectiveness of leaders could help increase attrition and career intentions to stay in the JAGC beyond one's current obligation.
Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Intención , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Liderazgo , Personal Militar , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Personal Militar/psicología , Personal Militar/estadística & datos numéricos , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Femenino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Apoyo Social , Persona de Mediana Edad , Percepción , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/normasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The veterinary workplace carries a high risk of staff accidents and injuries, yet there is scant research exploring it in comparison with other comparable fields, such as human medicine. AIMS: To understand how veterinary professionals define injuries and to understand what injuries they do, or do not, deem reportable. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey comprising demographic questions and open-text questions was shared with veterinary practice staff across the UK. Data were analysed descriptively and using an inductive content analysis. RESULTS: There were 740 respondents, who were broadly representative of the veterinary profession. There were differences in how injuries were defined; for example, small animal veterinarians expected injuries to involve blood, while equine and production animal veterinarians were more likely to expect injuries to reduce their ability to perform work and require medical treatment. Many suggested that 'all' workplace injuries should be reported; however, 'minor' injuries were often overlooked, for example, needlestick injuries did not always meet the criteria of being an 'injury'. Injuries caused by staff themselves (e.g. trips) were less likely to be reported than injuries that could be blamed on an external factor (e.g. dog bite). CONCLUSIONS: Collectively, the data suggest a wide-ranging perception of risk of injury in practice, with some harms seen as 'everyday norms'. Veterinary practices should interpret their injury statistics with a high degree of caution. They should explore the microcultures within their practices relating to worker perception of risk, injury and barriers to reporting.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos Ocupacionales , Veterinarios , Lugar de Trabajo , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/epidemiología , Veterinarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Femenino , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Masculino , Adulto , Accidentes de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Animales , Dolor/etiologíaRESUMEN
Nurse retention remains a pivotal issue, necessitating urgent strategies aimed at the recruitment and retention of highly qualified nurses. However, there is limited knowledge regarding the influence of nurses' personal and professional values, along with work environment, on predicting intent to leave an organization. Utilizing a secondary analysis approach, this study employed logistic regression to predict intent to leave among registered nurses (n = 671) using results from the Short Schwartz's Value Survey, the Nurses Professional Values Scale-3, and the Practice Environment Scale of the Nursing Work Index. Regression analysis indicates that the work environment including "Participation in Hospital Affairs" (B = -.665, odds ratio = .514), "Nurse Manager Ability, Leadership, and Support" (B = -.448, odds ratio = .639), and "Staffing and Resource Adequacy" (B = -.589, odds ratio = .555) are significant predictors of nurses' intentions to leave. Establishing and maintaining supportive work environments is essential for retention, highlighting the importance of effective leadership.
Asunto(s)
Intención , Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Reorganización del Personal , Lugar de Trabajo , Humanos , Reorganización del Personal/estadística & datos numéricos , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Femenino , Adulto , Masculino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/psicología , Personal de Enfermería en Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Liderazgo , Condiciones de TrabajoRESUMEN
Nursing is a profession with high rates of workplace injuries, hazards, and turnover. Improving the health and safety of nurses at work is vital to retain and grow the workforce to meet future demands. The purpose of this study was to describe the breadth of pain among American nurses and explore the relationships between this pain and modifiable work factors and perceived work performance. We used a cross-sectional descriptive design of 2312 nurses from across the United States. Nurses completed a survey containing questions about demographics, the presence of pain in the past week, the number of pain sites, pain locations, severity, and the impact on work performance. The median number of pain locations reported was 2, back pain was the most reported pain site, and average pain severity ranged from 4 to 5. Significant modifiable work factors associated with pain were average patient load and shift length. Many participants indicated that their pain impacted work performance, while a smaller proportion acknowledged that their pain impacted patient care. Pain among nurses spans multiple locations, is moderately severe, and impacts work performance. Addressing related modifiable work factors may decrease pain and the impact on the health, safety, and work performance of the nursing workforce.
Asunto(s)
Enfermeras y Enfermeros , Rendimiento Laboral , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Adulto , Femenino , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Rendimiento Laboral/normas , Rendimiento Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Dolor/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Workplace violence (WPV) has become a crisis for health care workers, with a significant increase in violent events taking place in health care settings across the nation. Health care organizations should develop a comprehensive WPV program that includes recognition, management, and reporting of all types of WPV. A large health care system developed strategies and a program to address WPV. The health care system believes that a safe and respectful work environment is foundational to the goal of zero preventable harm. The "Safety in the Workplace" initiative was designed to raise awareness of concerning behaviors and to offer tools and resources for identifying, responding to, and reporting incidents of violence, aggression, or disruptive behaviors of WPV. During a 6-month pilot of a WPV bundle, there was a 44% reduction in physical violence reports and a 44% reduction in reported incidents of WPV. From June 2020 to June 2021, there was a 10% decrease in WPV overall.
Asunto(s)
Violencia Laboral , Humanos , Violencia Laboral/prevención & control , Violencia Laboral/psicología , Violencia Laboral/estadística & datos numéricos , Empoderamiento , Lugar de Trabajo/psicología , Lugar de Trabajo/normasRESUMEN
Workforce shortages, increasing costs, decreased reimbursement, and focus on quality outcomes are crucial issues for health care leaders. To remain competitive, profitable, and productive, health care organizations need to provide structure, a safe working environment, and an acceptable leader workload to guarantee effective leader performance. Poorly designed work environments and interfaces can increase workload resulting in decreased performance and satisfaction. Excessive workload has led to reduced job satisfaction, productivity, and resilience. Due to leadership turnover and vacancy rates, leader workload was perceived to be unreasonable in the respiratory therapy (RT) department of an academic medical institution in central North Carolina. The aim of this quality initiative was to explore the workload of health care leaders in the RT department to identify the factors that influenced workload as well as implement strategies to decrease perceived workload. A workload assessment was performed, which identified inefficiencies and opportunities to partner with ancillary departments to align the workload with appropriate clinical teams. The redistribution of workload provided alignment, top of scope practice, and improved satisfaction among the RT department leaders. This article identifies the strategies utilized which can be translated to other institutions.
Asunto(s)
Satisfacción en el Trabajo , Carga de Trabajo , Humanos , Carga de Trabajo/normas , Carga de Trabajo/psicología , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , North Carolina , Liderazgo , Terapia Respiratoria/métodos , Terapia Respiratoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia Respiratoria/normas , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Lugar de Trabajo/psicologíaRESUMEN
Ensuring the safety and health of workers in this country, who are employed at millions of workplaces that present a dizzying array of hazards, is daunting. Every day, workers are maimed or die from workplace injuries or occupational illnesses. Hence, government agencies must use all available means to ensure the laws intended to keep workers safe and healthy in their workplaces are maximally effective in accomplishing that purpose. This paper addresses this challenge through the lens of strategic enforcement. It examines how federal and state authority are designed to interact to ensure worker protection in this space, and focuses on what tools for deterring violations - many unrecognized or underutilized by worker safety agencies - are available to leverage the limited resources that inevitably constrain the agencies' reach. The forthcoming Part II will, among other things, showcase a number of noteworthy state and local initiatives that exceed the federal standard.
Asunto(s)
Salud Laboral , Humanos , Salud Laboral/legislación & jurisprudencia , Salud Laboral/normas , Estados Unidos , Lugar de Trabajo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Lugar de Trabajo/normas , Administración de la Seguridad/legislación & jurisprudencia , Administración de la Seguridad/normas , Administración de la Seguridad/organización & administración , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/normas , United States Occupational Safety and Health Administration/legislación & jurisprudencia , Accidentes de Trabajo/prevención & control , Accidentes de Trabajo/legislación & jurisprudencia , Traumatismos Ocupacionales/prevención & controlRESUMEN
AIM: Conflicts are ubiquitous in human societies and manifest in varied forms and scales within societies, communities and organisations. While many studies have investigated workplace conflicts, least attention has been paid to how midwives differently experience these conflicts and the impacts of these conflicts on their wellbeing. This study fills this gap by investigating the multifaceted impact of workplace conflicts on the wellbeing of midwives. METHOD: The study employed a purely qualitative approach within the analytical framework of the Stress Theory of organisational conflicts. Thirty-five participants were selected for the study through an expert purposive sampling technique. Interviews and Focus Group Discussions were used to collect primary data for the study. Collected data were analysed using an inductive thematic analytical technique. RESULTS: The findings highlight the multifaceted impact of conflict on both the professional and personal well-being of midwives. Conflicts induce severe physical and psychological strains on midwives, generate fears, angst, and anxieties, and disrupt social harmony prompting exclusion and discrimination among midwives in the hospital. CONCLUSION: We argue that apart from task-demand generated stress, workplace conflicts prompt both physical and psychological stress on midwives which culminate into a myriad of physical, emotional, and mental health issues. IMPLICATION FOR PRACTICE: Initiation of conflict resolution and mediation training programs for midwives so as to equip them with essential skills for effectively managing and resolving workplace conflicts. Setting up internal grievance mechanisms for midwives in their work places and training of midwives on social skills, and stress management skills.