RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The use of generic drugs is a way for healthcare systems to reduce costs, particularly in ambulatory care. Several studies suggest that the prescriber's speciality is associated with the use of generic drugs, and that substitutable drugs prescribed by General Practitioners (GPs) are more often generic, but this association has never been studied in France. In the French legislative context, except in rare situations, all substitutable drugs prescribed should be dispensed in generic form. OBJECTIVES: Compare the generic drugs dispensing rate among substitutable drugs dispensed in community pharmacies prescribed by French private GPs with that of other private specialists, all other specialities combined (first objective) or each other speciality taken individually (second objective). METHODS: We used a sample of an open available semi-aggregated database from the 2019 French health insurance system database. We compared with logistic regression models GPs to all other specialities combined, then GPs to the 19 other specialties taken individually, only on the substitutable drugs they prescribe in common. RESULTS: In 2019, 53.4% of the drugs prescribed by French private ambulatory physicians were substitutable drugs, and 81.5% of them were dispensed in generic form. After adjustment, the generic dispensing rate for substitutable drugs was significantly higher for GPs than for other specialties (ORa 0.74 [IC95% 0.72-0.76]). Thirteen of the nineteen other specialities taken individually, such as endocrinologists (ORa 0.64 [IC95% 0.57-0.72]) and cardiologists (ORa 0.60 [0.56-0.63]) had significantly lower generic dispensing rates than GPs. No other speciality had a rate significantly higher than GPs. CONCLUSIONS: Substitutable drugs prescribed by French private GPs are more often dispensed in generic form than those from other private ambulatory specialties. To understand this result and optimise the use of generic drugs in outpatient settings, we need to study the different stages of drug use, from prescription by the physician to dispensing by the pharmacist and acceptance by the patient.
82% of substitutable drugs prescribed by French private general practitioners in 2019 were dispensed in generic form.No other ambulatory specialty rated significantly higher than general practitioners.Research is needed to study reasons for non-generic drug prescription in the context of legislative changes.
Asunto(s)
Medicamentos Genéricos , Médicos Generales , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Francia , Humanos , Medicamentos Genéricos/uso terapéutico , Medicamentos Genéricos/economía , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Sustitución de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Reembolso de Seguro de Salud/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Vulnerable social groups have greater difficulty in accessing care and a lower quality of care. Health systems focused on primary care appear to be more effective, efficient and equitable. However, difficulties in accessing primary care are persisting. We focused on primary care screening for cervical cancer through Cervico-Uterine Smear (CUS), which has been shown to be effective in reducing disease incidence and mortality. In this study, we aimed to investigate the characteristics of women who undergo CUS according to the category of health professionals (general practitioners or gynaecologists) performing CUS and to analyse potential differences in access to care in terms of socioeconomic and geographical characteristics. METHODS: This was a retrospective observational study based on data from the main health insurance schemes in France, allowing analysis of health care consumption according to socioeconomic levels and proximity to health care services. We included women aged 25 to 64 years in 2012 for whom CUS would be a relevant procedure (695,694). The sociodemographic and territorial indicators were age, geographical area deprivation, and the availability of gynaecological care. The analysis was performed using multinomial logistic regression. RESULTS: A total of 202,271 (29%) patients underwent CUS; of whom 68% underwent CUS administered by gynaecologists and 28% were administered by general practitioners (GPs). However, inequalities in CUS screening rates were observed, with a decrease in the number of CUSs performed with increased age, a rural location, deprivation, and sparse health care provisions. Deprived people seemed less penalised by GPs. CONCLUSIONS: Involvement of General Practitioners may improve cervical screening equality in France. The organisation of health systems around primary care may allow a better access to care and to account for the specific needs of deprived populations.
Asunto(s)
Detección Precoz del Cáncer , Médicos Generales , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , Francia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/diagnóstico , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Frotis Vaginal/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores SocioeconómicosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The UK provided guidance for general practitioners (GPs) to deliver essential care services during the COVID-19 pandemic. Our objective was to describe local GP experiences and approaches to delivering care while similar formal guidance in Australia was unavailable. METHOD: Two hundred and ninety-one GPs who practised during the March 2020 to December 2021 COVID-19 lockdowns in Melbourne and Sydney undertook an electronic survey exploring perceptions of essential care service delivery. The provision of care by Australian practices was compared to UK Royal College of General Practitioners' recommendations. RESULTS: Of 274 completed surveys, Australian GP practices were 60% concordant with UK guideline recommendations. There was a large shift towards telehealth service provision across the board, from diagnosis to follow-up. Most care continued if it was deliverable through telehealth or had urgent or time-sensitive need. DISCUSSION: Local guidance for delivery of essential care services should be developed for future calamities, informed by GPs' experience practising during the COVID 19 pandemic and considering Australian contextual factors.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Médicos Generales , Telemedicina , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Australia , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , SARS-CoV-2 , Atención a la Salud , Pandemias , Actitud del Personal de Salud , FemeninoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Inappropriate prescribing may have detrimental consequences for the patient and increase healthcare utilisation and costs. Academic detailing (AD) is an interactive outreach method to deliver non-commercial evidence-based medical information to healthcare professionals, aiming to improve patient care. Performing AD virtually has recently become more relevant, especially with the COVID-19 pandemic. OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to explore general practitioners' (GP's) experiences and perceptions of virtually delivered AD. METHODS: We invited practicing GPs that had received virtual AD in Norway during autumn 2020. Semistructured individual interviews were audio and video recorded during February-May 2021. Interviews were transcribed and analysed applying thematic analysis according to Braun and Clarke. RESULTS: From interviews with nine GPs, we identified five themes concerning (1) informants' satisfaction with virtual AD and their opinions about the detailers and their characteristics, (2) factors that are important for participation in AD, with the campaign topic being the most important, (3) a paradox between the informants' desire for more time for discussion and the time constraint they are facing, (4) the many benefits of virtual AD compared with in-person AD and (5) the informants' perceived learning outcomes are unaffected by mode of AD delivery. CONCLUSION: Virtual AD worked very well in terms of scheduling the visit, using technology to facilitate the visit and achieving the same learning outcomes. Virtual AD should be offered to GPs as an alternative to the traditional in-person AD, especially in remote geographical areas or in circumstances when physical outreach is challenging.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Médicos Generales , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Noruega , Médicos Generales/psicología , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , SARS-CoV-2 , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Entrevistas como Asunto/métodos , Telemedicina/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate whether referrals of general practitioners (GPs) to the memory clinic align with the regional and national dementia guidelines. DESIGN: For this single center retrospective study, data was collected from electronic patient files. METHOD: GP referrals to the memory clinic over a 1-year period were categorized and evaluated according to the regional and national guidelines. RESULTS: 310 GP referrals were included with the most common referral motivations: "Additional somatic or psychiatric factors" (77; 24,8%) and "Straightforward dementia diagnosis" (70; 22,6%). A total of 51,0% of referrals were not in line with regional guidelines: either because of non-compliant referral reasons; or limited cognitive assessment without clinical findings and/or cognitive testing. CONCLUSION: Half of GP referrals to the memory clinic were not in line with the national and regional guidelines. Referrals were often not preceded by clinical findings and/or cognitive testing. Aiming for effective care, cognitive assessments in primary care should be encouraged and with appropriate assistance.
Asunto(s)
Demencia , Atención Primaria de Salud , Derivación y Consulta , Humanos , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Demencia/diagnóstico , Femenino , Masculino , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Swine flu might serve as a model for challenges that primary care faces during pandemics. This study examined changes in the numbers and diagnoses of general practitioner (GP) visits during and after the Swine flu pandemic in Vantaa, a Finnish city, and how GP activities recovered after the pandemic. Putative sex and age group differences were also evaluated. METHODS: The study was an observational retrospective study. The monthly number of patient visits to primary care GPs by women and men in age groups 0-19, 20-64 and 65 + years was recorded before, during and two years after the Swine flu pandemic. The recorded diagnoses were also examined. The investigation period was from 2008 to 2012. RESULTS: The numbers of monthly visits to primary care decreased from 12 324 (mean) to 10 817 in women and from 8563 to 7612 in men during the first six months of the Swine flu, returning to the original level afterwards. This decrease was thus slightly more prominent in women. However, as the size of the population increased during the follow-up period, the actual number of GP visits adjusted for the size of population remained at a decreased level for two years after the Swine flu. This decrease was observed especially in office-hours visits of men (from 3692 to 3260) and women (from 6301 to 5428) of 20-64 years. Swine flu did not alter the number of visits to the primary care Emergency Department. The proportion of visits with diagnostic recordings of common infectious diseases mostly decreased during the Swine flu. Only a minor impact on the distribution of recordings of chronic diagnoses was found. CONCLUSION: A pandemic, such as Swine flu, may decrease office-hours visits to primary care GPs. This in turn may lead to activities of primary care being adjusted downward for a long time following the pandemic. Especially the age group 20-64 years may be affected. This risk should be considered when recovery from the COVID-19 pandemic begins. Swine flu did not affect the proportion of consultations of chronic diseases, but the number of diagnoses of common infectious diseases had diminished.
Asunto(s)
Subtipo H1N1 del Virus de la Influenza A , Gripe Humana , Pandemias , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Gripe Humana/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Finlandia/epidemiología , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Niño , Lactante , Anciano , Preescolar , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Recién Nacido , Factores de Edad , Factores Sexuales , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Background Chronic pelvic pain (CPP) is a common and debilitating condition, and sufferers present to healthcare professionals with variable complex symptoms and co-morbidities. This study aimed to investigate the current beliefs and practice behaviours of healthcare professionals towards the management of CPP in Australian females. Methods We distributed an online survey to Australian healthcare professionals. Participants were questioned regarding their beliefs, the importance of various contributing factors and assessment variables, and their management preferences for two CPP vignettes. Demographic information and responses were analysed with descriptive statistics. Results Complete data were obtained and analysed from 446 respondents including gynaecologists (n =75), general practitioners (GPs) (n =184) and physiotherapists (n =187). Most of the respondents were female (88.1%), with male (11.7%) and other (0.2%) making up a smaller representation. Physiotherapists rated themselves higher in understanding mechanisms of CPP (64.7% very good to excellent) compared to gynaecologists (41.3%) and GPs (22.8%). Physiotherapists also reported higher levels of confidence in managing patients with CPP (57.8% quite or extremely confident) compared to 41.3% of gynaecologists and 22.3% of GPs who reported being quite or extremely confident. All three professions rated patient's beliefs (89.8%), nervous system sensitisation (85.7%), stress/anxiety/depression (91.9%), fear avoidance (83.3%), history of sexual/emotional/physical abuse (94.1%) and pelvic floor muscle function (85.0%) as very/extremely important factors in the development of chronic pelvic pain. Most gynaecologists (71.0%) and GPs (70.2%) always referred for pelvic ultrasound during assessment. Physiotherapists assessed goal setting (88.8%) and screened for patients' beliefs (80.9%) more often than gynaecologists (30.4% and 39.1% respectively) and GPs (46.5% and 29.0% respectively). Conclusions All three groups of healthcare professionals demonstrated a good understanding of pain mechanisms and incorporated a biopsychosocial and multidisciplinary approach to management of females with chronic pelvic pain. However, both gynaecologists and GPs were less confident in their understanding of and management of CPP, and less likely to consider patient beliefs and goals. The findings of this online survey may assist in the provision of more targeted education to further improve management of this condition.
Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Dolor Crónico , Dolor Pélvico , Humanos , Femenino , Dolor Pélvico/terapia , Dolor Pélvico/psicología , Estudios Transversales , Australia , Masculino , Adulto , Dolor Crónico/terapia , Dolor Crónico/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Persona de Mediana Edad , Personal de Salud/psicología , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Médicos Generales/psicología , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Fisioterapeutas/psicología , Fisioterapeutas/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
Bed bug infestations have been increasing worldwide since the 2000s. Their consequences for health range from skin reactions to major psychological distress. However, epidemiological data is still lacking. This study estimated the incidence of general practice consultations related to bed bugs in France and evaluated factors associated with repercussions on everyday life. We conducted a prospective observational study from March 2019 to April 2020 among 217 GPs in France. Annual and monthly GP consultations related to bed bugs were estimated from the reported cases. Descriptive analyses were performed, and factors associated with repercussions on everyday life were assessed using a logistic regression model. The annual incidence rate of GP consultations related to bed bugs was estimated at 109 per 100,000 inhabitants [95%CI: 92-126]. Bed bug-related consultations occurred in all regions, peaking in the summer. Moderate-to-severe repercussions on everyday life were reported by 39% of the patients. The associated factors with this level of repercussions were: having seen bed bugs (OR = 4.02 [95%CI: 1.6-10.73]), having lesions from scratching (OR = 5.25 [1.65-19.92]), having lesions on the head and the neck (OR = 3.97 [1.52-10.95]) and reporting psychological distress (OR = 6.79 [2.47-20.42]). This study provides new knowledge on GP consultations related to bed bugs in France. These data will help tailor public health programs to the population's needs, including information and training for primary healthcare professionals.
Asunto(s)
Chinches , Medicina General , Médicos Generales , Humanos , Francia/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Incidencia , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Generales/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Animales , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: COPD management and therapy have been periodically revised to support a more patient-specific approach. Several concerns remain in primary care, such as the proper choice of initial treatment, medication adherence, and missing values for spirometry investigations. These concerns may be exacerbated by inconsistencies between the GOLD23 report and reimbursement criteria, as per the Italian NOTA99, especially for what concerns the assessment of disease severity and related treatment choice. We therefore examined the perception and knowledge of general practitioners (GPs) on COPD management and treatment. METHODS: We conducted an exploratory e-Delphi study among 600 GPs. The study examined the COPD-related GP's access to spirometry evaluations in primary care clinics; knowledge on early recognition of COPD and related clinical concerns; perception of the clinical application of the NOTA99; the place in therapy of the triple LABA/LAMA/ICS combination. RESULTS: Among 466 participating GPs (response rate: 70.3%; mean age 52, SD: 14.2; mean years of experience: 21.3, SD: 15) had a good level of knowledge about the GOLD 2023 document and the reimbursement criteria for COPD medications. Nevertheless, a low (34%) direct access to spirometry was reported, along with absence of consensus on the proper choice of initial treatment (especially of use of LABA/LAMA combination), and the re-evaluation of free-triple therapy LABA/LAMA/ICS through specialist's referral. CONCLUSIONS: This study captured the domains on which further training for GPs might be implemented to improve the management and treatment of COPD. An extension of this e-Delphi to a larger GPs' panel might further confirm these findings.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedad Pulmonar Obstructiva Crónica/economía , Humanos , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Espirometría , Anciano , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/economía , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/normas , Mecanismo de ReembolsoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Seasonal influenza vaccination coverage in Italian older adults is insufficient and well below the minimum target of 75%. In Italy, most influenza vaccine doses are administered by general practitioners (GPs), whose number has been declining. In parallel, the number of patients per GP and GP workload increased dramatically, which theoretically may impair vaccination counselling. In this ecological study, we aimed to assess whether influenza vaccination coverage in older adults is associated with the density of GPs having high number of patients. METHODS: The study outcome was the influenza vaccination coverage rate in adults aged ≥ 65 years and registered in 20 Italian regions over the last 23 years. The independent variable of interest was the proportion of GPs with more than 1,500 adult patients, which is an imposed normative ceiling. This latter variable was considered as a proxy of GP overload. By adopting a panel regression approach, different specifications of fixed- and random-effects models were run to assess the association of interest, when adjusted for several social structural, economic and healthcare-related variables. RESULTS: Over the last two decades, most regions showed a negative association between influenza vaccination coverage rates and the density of GPs with a high number of patients. This latter negative association was confirmed (P < 0.05) in different panel model specifications. In particular, in the fully adjusted two-way fixed-effects model, each 10% increase in the number of GPs with more than 1,500 patients was associated with a 1.7% decrease in influenza vaccination coverage. However, this association was present only in region-years where at least 18% of GPs were deemed overloaded. CONCLUSIONS: In the upcoming years, the number of Italian GPs is projected to decline further. At the same time, the aging Italian population will determine an even greater workload for GPs. This study demonstrated that increased GP workload may partially explain the spatiotemporal variation in influenza vaccination uptake in the Italian elderly. With the imperative of increasing or at least maintaining influenza vaccination coverage rates, several short- and mid-term initiatives should be implemented in order to optimize GP workload during seasonal immunization campaigns.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Vacunas contra la Influenza , Gripe Humana , Cobertura de Vacunación , Humanos , Italia , Anciano , Vacunas contra la Influenza/administración & dosificación , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Gripe Humana/prevención & control , Masculino , Femenino , Cobertura de Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Misuse and overuse of antibiotics comprise leading causes of antimicrobial resistance. The study aims to assess the pattern of antibiotic prescription among primary healthcare general practitioners in the South Batinah Governorate of Oman. METHOD: A cross-sectional study of 600 antibiotic prescriptions issued in the South Batinah Governorate in 2019 was conducted to verify the triggering diagnoses and determine the appropriateness of the prescribed antibiotic. Logistic regression analysis was used to determine the association between predictors and inappropriate use. RESULTS: Respiratory infections accounted for 62% of antibiotic prescriptions, of which 92.2% were inappropriately prescribed. Extended-spectrum antibiotics were inappropriately prescribed in 33.3% of cystitis cases, while 14.3% of gastroenteritis received incorrect spectrum of antibiotics. Amoxicillin represented 46.2% of antibiotic prescriptions, of which 84.4% were unnecessarily prescribed. Lower inappropriate antibiotic prescribing rate was linked to patients ≥ 18 years (OR = 0.46, 95% CI: [0.26, 0.82]), those who underwent laboratory tests (OR = 0.22, 95% CI: [0.12, 0.39]), and consultations at health centers (OR = 0.44, 95% CI: [0.24, 0.79]). Arabic-speaking physicians were more likely to prescribe antibiotics inappropriately. CONCLUSION: Inappropriate antibiotic prescription was frequently observed in mild respiratory infections and associated with specific patient and physician characteristics. Appropriateness of antibiotic prescriptions issued can be improved through enhanced testing capacities as well as implementation of physician and community awareness campaigns.
Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Médicos Generales , Prescripción Inadecuada , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Omán/epidemiología , Estudios Transversales , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
AIM OF THIS STUDY: General internal medicine is a crucial element in healthcare systems. Understanding how many people are and will be working in this field is important to maintain and improve quality for patients in healthcare systems. This can provide a basis for political decisions. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional study to analyse the current and future workforce of generalists (general practitioners and internists in hospitals) in Switzerland. The Swiss Society of General Internal Medicine (SSGIM) distributed a survey to all members. Respondents were asked about their current average workload in 2023 and planned workload in 2033. The responses were used to calculate full-time equivalent (FTE) for the current and future workforce of generalists and to extrapolate FTE for all active SSGIM members. To model the demand by 2033, we derived different scenarios. RESULTS: Of all 6,232 active SSGIM members, 2,030 (33%) participated: 46% female, 25% (largest age group) 56-65 years old, 19% still in postgraduate training. The average workload in 2023 was 78% for female and 87% for male generalists; the FTE extrapolated to all active SSGIM members in 2023 was 5,246. By 2033, 1,935 FTEs (36%) will retire, 502 FTEs (10%) will reduce their workload, 116 FTEs (2%) will increase their workload and 2,800 FTEs (53%) will remain in the workforce with the same workload as in 2023. To maintain the same workforce as in 2023, 2,321 new FTEs (44%) will be needed by 2033. To fill this gap of 232 FTE new generalists per year, we modelled different scenarios with assumptions of interest, workload, migration and dropouts. CONCLUSIONS: Within only one decade, 44% of the current workforce of generalists will disappear, mainly due to retirement and decreased workload. To fill this gap, various scenarios need to be incorporated. Politicians are called upon to create the political framework to create attractive training and working conditions for generalists to address the future demand for healthcare services.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Medicina Interna , Carga de Trabajo , Humanos , Suiza , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Masculino , Medicina Interna/estadística & datos numéricos , Carga de Trabajo/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos Generales/provisión & distribución , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano , Adulto , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Fuerza Laboral en Salud/tendencias , Recursos Humanos/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
AIMS: Maintaining continuity of care between doctors and patients is considered a fundamental aspect of quality in primary healthcare. In this study, we aim to examine continuity in Norway over time by computing two commonly used indicators of continuity: the St Leonard's Index of Continuity of Care (SLICC) and the Usual Provider of Care Index (UPC). METHOD: We employ individual-level data, which covers all primary care consultations. This data includes the identities of each patient and physician, and we can identify each patient's regular general practitioner (GP). The SLICC is calculated as the share of consultations conducted by the patient's regular GP annually from 2006 to 2021. Additionally, we identify each patient's most visited physician and compute the UPC as the share of total consultations conducted by the most visited physician during the same period. Our analysis is conducted at the national level and stratified according to the level of centrality, differentiating between areas of high, moderate, and low centrality. RESULTS: Our findings reveal that, at the national level, SLICC and UPC exhibit remarkable stability, reaching 64 and 71 percent, respectively, in 2021. However, there is significant geographical variation, with the least central areas experiencing less continuous healthcare (SLICC at 49 percent in 2021) than patients residing in more central areas (SLICC at 68 in 2021). CONCLUSION: Our results demonstrate a high degree of continuity that has been stable over time. However, large geographical variations suggest that policymakers should strive to reduce geographical disparities in healthcare quality.
Asunto(s)
Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente , Medicina General , Noruega , Humanos , Continuidad de la Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina General/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
This study aimed to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on general practitioner (GP), specialist, and dentist visits among 40 million Iranians covered by the Social Security Organization (SSO). A monthly interrupted time series analysis was conducted over a period of 72 months, including-47 months before the pandemic and 25 months after its onset. The outcomes variables were monthly number of GP, specialist, and dentist visits per 1000 SSO-insured individuals. The analysis was performed by total visits, visits to the SSO direct sector, and visits to the indirect sectors. The study found that in the first month of the pandemic, the number of visits per 1000 insured individuals significantly decreased for visits to GPs (by 51.12, 95% CI -64.42 to -37.88), visits to specialists (by 39.11, 95% CI -51.61 to -26.62), and visits to dentists (by 6.67, 95% CI -8.55 to -4.78). However, during the subsequent months of the pandemic, there was a significant increase in the number of monthly visits for all three categories, with GPs experiencing the highest increase (1.78 visits per 1000 insured), followed by specialists (1.32 visits per 1000 insured), and dentists (0.05 visits per 1000 insured). Furthermore, prior to the pandemic, the number of monthly GP visits per 1000 insured individuals was statistically significantly lower in the indirect sector compared to the direct sector (45.79, 95% CI -52.69 to -38.89). Conversely, the direct sector exhibited lower rates of specialist visits (25.84 visits per 1000 insured individuals, 95% CI 22.87 to 28.82) and dentist visits (0.75 visits per 1000 insured individuals, 95% CI 0.12 to 1.36) compared to the indirect sector. Additionally, the study found that in the first month of the pandemic, the monthly number of GP visits in the indirect sector significantly increased by 34.44 times (95% CI 24.81 to 44.08) compared to the direct sector. For specialist visits and dentist visits, the increase was 3.41 (95% CI -5.87 to 12.69) and 5.01 (95% CI 3.48 to 6.53) per 1000 insured individuals, respectively. Overall, the findings of this study demonstrate statistically significant disruptions in GP, specialist, and dentist visits during the COVID-19 pandemic, although some recovery was observed. Both the direct and indirect sectors experienced decreased visits.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Odontólogos , Humanos , COVID-19/epidemiología , Irán/epidemiología , Odontólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pandemias , SARS-CoV-2/aislamiento & purificación , Visita a Consultorio Médico/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Análisis de Series de Tiempo Interrumpido , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto Joven , Adolescente , Anciano , NiñoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: SMS texting systems have been considered a potential solution to reduce missed appointments in primary care. Existing research in this area focuses on qualitative studies investigating the attitudes of SMS text users and receivers. OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to examine appointment data from an independent general practitioner (GP) surgery in Wrexham, United Kingdom, with approximately 15,000 patients, to determine the impact of text messaging systems on reducing missed appointments. The objective of this study was to investigate whether the use of text messages can effectively reduce missed appointments. METHODS: To collect data for the study, SQL reports were run on EMIS Web, the United Kingdom's most widely used clinical system. The data spanned 10 years, from September 1, 2010, to March 31, 2020. Data accuracy was verified by cross-referencing with appointment diary records. Mann-Whitney and Kruskal-Wallis tests, chosen for their suitability in comparing groups in nonparametric settings, were conducted in Microsoft Excel due to its accessibility. RESULTS: Statistical analyses were conducted to compare data before and after implementation of the text messaging system. The results revealed a significant 42.8% reduction in missed appointments (before: 5848; after: 3343; P<.001). Further analysis of demographic characteristics revealed interesting trends, with no significant difference in missed appointments between genders, and variations observed across different age groups. The median number of missed appointments was not significantly different between genders (women: 1.55, IQR 1.11-2.16; men: 1.61, IQR 1.08-2.12; P=.73). Despite the prevalence of mobile phone use among young adults aged 20-25 years, the highest rates of missed appointments (848/7256, 11.7%) were noted in this group, whereas the lowest rates were noted in the 75-80 years age group (377/7256; 5.2%; P<.001). Analysis by age and gender indicated inconsistencies: women aged 20-25 years (571/4216) and men aged 35-40 years (306/3040) had the highest rates of missed appointments, whereas women aged 70-75 years (177/4216) and men aged 75-80 years (129/3040) had the lowest rates (P<.001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrates that SMS text messaging in primary care can significantly reduce missed appointments. Implementing technology such as SMS text messaging systems enables patients to cancel appointments on time, leading to improved efficiency in primary care settings.
Asunto(s)
Citas y Horarios , Envío de Mensajes de Texto , Humanos , Envío de Mensajes de Texto/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto Joven , Reino Unido , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistemas Recordatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , AdolescenteRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The healthcare systems in Scandinavia inform nationwide registers and the Scandinavian populations are increasingly combined in research. We aimed to compare Norway (NO), Sweden (SE), and Denmark (DK) regarding sociodemographic factors and healthcare. METHODS: In this cross-sectional study, we analyzed aggregated data from the nationwide Scandinavian registers. We calculated country-specific statistics on sociodemographic factors and healthcare use (general practitioner visits, admissions to somatic hospitals, and use of medicines). RESULTS: In 2018, population were 5295,619 (NO), 10,120,242 (SE), and 5781,190 (DK). The populations were comparable regarding sex, age, education, and income distribution. Overall, medication use was comparable, while there was more variation in hospital admissions and general practitioner visits. For example, per 1000 inhabitants, 703 (NO), 665 (SE), and 711 (DK) individuals redeemed a prescription, whereas there were 215 (NO), 134 (SE), and 228 (DK) somatic hospital admissions per 1000 inhabitants. General practitioner contacts per 1000 inhabitants were 7082 in DK and 5773 in NO (-data from SE). CONCLUSION: The Scandinavian countries are comparable regarding aggregate-level sociodemographic factors and medication use. Variations are noted in healthcare utilisation as measured by visits to general practitioners and admissions to hospitals. This variation should be considered when comparing data from the Scandinavian countries.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Hospitalización , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Noruega , Anciano , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Dinamarca , Suecia , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Adulto Joven , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Factores Sociodemográficos , Preescolar , Niño , Lactante , Factores Socioeconómicos , Recién NacidoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: General practitioners (GPs) make numerous care decisions throughout their workdays. Extended periods of decision making can result in decision fatigue, a gradual shift toward decisions that are less cognitively effortful. This study examines whether observed patterns in GPs' prescribing decisions are consistent with the decision fatigue phenomenon. We hypothesized that the likelihood of prescribing frequently overprescribed medications (antibiotics, benzodiazepines, opioids; less effortful to prescribe) will increase and the likelihood of prescribing frequently underprescribed medications (statins, osteoporosis medications; more effortful to prescribe) will decrease over the workday. METHODS: This study used nationally representative primary care data on GP-patient encounters from the Bettering the Evaluation and Care of Health program from Australia. The association between prescribing decisions and order of patient encounters over a GP's workday was assessed with generalized linear mixed models accounting for clustering and adjusting for patient, provider, and encounter characteristics. RESULTS: Among 262,456 encounters recorded by 2,909 GPs, the odds of prescribing antibiotics significantly increased by 8.7% with 15 additional patient encounters (odds ratio [OR] = 1.087; confidence interval [CI] = 1.059-1.116). The odds of prescribing decreased significantly with 15 additional patient encounters by 6.3% for benzodiazepines (OR = 0.937; CI = 0.893-0.983), 21.9% for statins (OR = 0.791; CI = 0.753-0.831), and 25.0% for osteoporosis medications (OR = 0.750; CI = 0.690-0.814). No significant effects were observed for opioids. All findings were replicated in confirmatory analyses except the effect of benzodiazepines. CONCLUSIONS: GPs were increasingly likely to prescribe antibiotics and were less likely to prescribe statins and osteoporosis medications as the workday wore on, which was consistent with decision fatigue. There was no convincing evidence of decision fatigue effects in the prescribing of opioids or benzodiazepines. These findings establish decision fatigue as a promising target for optimizing prescribing behavior. HIGHLIGHTS: We found that as general practitioners progress through their workday, they become more likely to prescribe antibiotics that are reportedly overprescribed and less likely to prescribe statins and osteoporosis medications that are reportedly underprescribed.This change in decision making over time is consistent with the decision fatigue phenomenon. Decision fatigue occurs when we make many decisions without taking a rest break. As we make those decisions, we become gradually more likely to make decisions that are less difficult.The findings of this study show that decision fatigue is a possible target for improving guideline-compliant prescribing of pharmacologic medications.
Asunto(s)
Médicos Generales , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Australia , Masculino , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Anciano , Toma de Decisiones , Benzodiazepinas/uso terapéutico , Toma de Decisiones Clínicas/métodos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Fatiga/tratamiento farmacológico , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/normasRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Several studies described that COVID-19 vaccinations can cause menstrual disorders. Our study aimed to describe whether this also resulted in more general practitioner (GP) consultations for menstrual disorders after COVID-19 vaccination, based on a large cohort study. METHODS: A retrospective self-controlled cohort study was performed including vaccinated women in 2021 aged 12-49 years from two large, representative GP databases in the Netherlands. Incidence rates and incidence rate ratio's (IRR) were calculated using Poisson regression, adjusting for SARS-CoV-2 infection as time-varying confounder. The exposed period was set at maximum six months after each COVID-19 vaccination and the non-exposed period was defined as all-time outside the exposed period. RESULTS: The cohort included 631,802 women, of which 18,986 (3 %) consulted the GP for a menstrual disorder during 2021. Increased GP consultations were observed among 12-14 year olds for amenorrhea/hypomenorrhea/oligomenorrhea (IRR: 1.85, 95 % CI: 1.30-2.65) and irregular/frequent menstruation (IRR: 1.33, 95 % CI: 1.06-1.69) after COVID-19 vaccination in general, and after Pfizer/BioNTech vaccination (IRR: 1.87, 95 % CI: 1.31-2.67 for amenorrhea/hypomenorrhea/oligomenorrhea and IRR: 1.35, 95 % CI: 1.06-1.70 for irregular/frequent menstruation). Persons from this age group were in general also vaccinated with Pfizer/BioNTech. No increase in the frequency of GP consultations were observed for older age groups, other vaccine brands, and potential risk groups. CONCLUSION: For the majority of women, no increased GP consultations for menstrual disorders was found. Solely for the youngest age group (12-14 year olds) increased GP consultations for specific types of menstrual disorders was found after Pfizer/BioNTech vaccination.
Asunto(s)
Vacunas contra la COVID-19 , COVID-19 , Vacunación , Humanos , Femenino , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/efectos adversos , Vacunas contra la COVID-19/administración & dosificación , Adulto Joven , Estudios Retrospectivos , COVID-19/prevención & control , COVID-19/epidemiología , Niño , Persona de Mediana Edad , Vacunación/efectos adversos , Vacunación/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2/inmunología , Trastornos de la Menstruación/epidemiología , Trastornos de la Menstruación/etiología , Trastornos de la Menstruación/inducido químicamente , Derivación y Consulta/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Generales/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Cohortes , IncidenciaRESUMEN
There is a lack of knowledge about the health consequences of politically initiated forced permanent rehousing (FPR) of residents in social housing areas. This study investigates if FPR is associated with the contact frequency with general practitioner (GP) and the proportion of residents who use antidepressants. The study included 432 rehoused residents matched 1:2 with remaining residents and residents from a comparable neighbouring area without exposure to rehousing. For GP contact frequency, we conducted a difference-in-difference analysis while the proportion of residents who used antidepressants was investigated through descriptive statistics. We found high GP contact frequency in the three groups, but no significant differences. Further, we found a low proportion of residents who used antidepressants in all groups, but a small increase from baseline to follow-up. Our results thus suggest that FPR neither affected the rehoused residents' GP contact frequency nor the proportion who used antidepressants.