Comparison of interface pressures on three operating table support surfaces during surgery.

AIM OF THE STUDY: To investigate the effect of support surface usage and positions on interface pressure during surgery. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This randomized controlled experimental study was conducted between October 2018 and June 2019. The study included patients who had planned surgery in supine and prone positions. The sample size was 72 patients. Patients were assigned to three groups (gel support surface, viscoelastic support surface and standard operating table) according to the determined randomization table. During the surgery, the pressure in the patients' body was recorded. The statistics program IBM SPSS Statistics 25.0 packaged software was used in the analyses of data. RESULTS: There was no statistically significant difference between the total body average interface pressure (mmHg) values between the supporting surfaces in the prone position. There was a statistically significant difference between the total body average interface pressure (mmHg) values between the support surfaces in the supine position, and the average interface pressure measured on the viscoelastic foam support surface was significantly lower than the gel support surface and the standard operating table. CONCLUSION: In the study, the use of viscoelastic foam support surface was found to be more effective than the use of a standard operating table and gel support surface. Viscoelastic foam support surface is recommended for patients at risk for pressure injury in the operating room.

A comparison of air-cell and gel surgical table pads and an evaluation of the influence of pressure distribution and other factors on pressure injury prevention.

Guidelines for pressure injury prevention consider the use of pressure-redistributing pads to prevent tissue deformation. However, limited research exists to assess the pressure distribution provided by the operating tables and the effectiveness of pressure-redistributing pads in preventing pressure injuries. In this study, we compared the pressure distribution properties of two surgical table pads and identified parameters influencing pressure injury outcomes after a lengthy surgical procedure. Twenty-seven patients undergoing left ventricular assist device implantation surgery participated in the study. Participants were randomly assigned to use either an air cell-based pad or a gel pad. Interface pressure was recorded during the surgery. We analyzed the effect of surgical table pad type, interface pressure distribution and pressure injury outcomes and analyzed what characteristics of the patients and the interface pressure are most influential for the development of pressure injuries. Comparing the interface pressure parameters between the air-cell group and the gel group, only the peak pressure index x time was significantly different (p < 0.05). We used univariate logistic regression analysis to identify significant predictors for the pressure injury outcome. The support surface was not significant. And, among patient characteristics, only age and BMI were significant (p ≤ 0.05). Among the interface pressure parameters, pressure density maxima, peak pressure index x time, and coefficient of variation were significant for pressure injury outcome (p ≤ 0.05). Peak pressure index, average pressure, and the surgery length were not statistically significant for pressure injury outcomes.

Effect of Prone Positional Apparatus on the Occurrence of Acute Kidney Injury After Spine Surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Increased intra-abdominal pressure with prone positioning for spinal surgery is associated with intraoperative hemodynamic alterations and the potential for postoperative complications. This study investigated the incidence of postoperative acute kidney injury (AKI) in patients undergoing spine surgery on a Jackson spinal table or a Wilson frame. METHODS: A total of 1374 patients who underwent spine surgery were divided into 2 groups: Jackson spinal table (n = 598) and Wilson frame group (n = 776). After 1:1 propensity score matching, a final analysis was performed on 970 patients. The primary endpoint was a comparison of the incidence of AKI in the 2 groups. RESULTS: After propensity score matching analysis, the mean ± standard deviations of spine surgery invasiveness index were 4.7 ± 3.5 and 2.1 ± 1.4 in patients with the Jackson spinal table and the Wilson frame, respectively (P < 0.001). Considering the differences in surgical invasiveness, operative time, estimated blood loss, and administration of packed red blood cells were higher in the Jackson spinal table group than in the Wilson frame group (P < 0.001). However, the incidence of AKI was less with the Jackson spinal table than with the Wilson frame (1.7% vs. 3.7%, 2.25 [0.978-5.175], P = 0.056), not reaching statistical significance. CONCLUSION: This analysis showed that postoperative AKI in patients undergoing spine surgery in the prone position was not different with the Wilson frame than in the Jackson spinal table despite higher surgical severity, longer operative times, and more blood loss in the latter group. In spine surgery, the appropriate selection of prone positioning apparatus can potentially be an important consideration in reducing the risk of AKI.

Effect of Body Mass on Oxygenation and Intra-Abdominal Pressure When Using a Jackson Surgical Table in the Prone Position During Lumbar Surgery.

STUDY DESIGN: Prospective observational study. OBJECTIVE: To test the hypothesis that different types of surgical frame and the patient's body mass index (BMI) can affect pulmonary compliance, intra-abdominal pressure (IAP), and oxygenation. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: The oxygenation index (PaO2/FiO2) and IAP are known to be associated with BMI when patients are in the supine position. However, there are few reports on the correlation between BMI, the oxygenation index, and IAP in the prone position, especially when a Jackson surgical table is used. METHODS: Thirty-seven adult patients were divided into two groups according to BMI: normal-weight patients (n = 19, BMI: 18.5-24.9 kg m) and overweight patients (n = 18, BMI ≥ 25 kg m). After the induction of general anesthesia, patients were turned to the prone position onto either a Jackson surgical table (Mizuho OSI) or a general surgical table (MAQUET; foam pad, China). The patient's IAP, peak airway pressure, pulmonary dynamic compliance (Cdyn), and oxygenation index were recorded. RESULTS: In overweight patients, there was a greater increase in peak airway pressure and a greater decrease in Cdyn observed when a general surgical table was used compared with the Jackson surgical table. When the Jackson surgical table was used, there was a greater increase in the oxygenation index and a greater decrease in IAP. There was a significant negative correlation between the oxygenation index and BMI and a significant positive correlation between IAP and BMI in the prone position. CONCLUSION: Turning patients from the supine to the prone position during anesthesia results in an increase in the oxygenation index and a decrease in IAP. Both of these factors are dependent upon the type of surgical frame used and the patient's BMI. The reduction in IAP was particularly significant when a Jackson surgical table was used for overweight patients. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4.