Asunto(s)
Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal , Salud Mental , Humanos , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/terapia , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/patología , Enfermedad Crónica , Dieta , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/terapia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/patología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicologíaAsunto(s)
Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal , Salud Mental , Humanos , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/patología , Tumores del Estroma Gastrointestinal/terapia , Enfermedad Crónica , Dieta , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/patología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/terapiaRESUMEN
This study's objective was to observe the application effect of psychological counseling intervention based on the WeChat platform for patients with gastrointestinal tumors undergoing chemotherapy with completely implanted venous infusion ports. From October 2022 to December 2023, 110 patients with gastrointestinal tumors undergoing chemotherapy with completely implanted venous infusion ports were selected from our hospital. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to the different types of care. The control group received routine psychological counseling intervention, while the WeChat group received psychological counseling intervention based on the WeChat platform in addition to the routine intervention provided to the control group. A comparison was made between the 2 groups in terms of adverse events, compliance, hope level scores, and changes in coping strategy scores. The WeChat group experienced 7 adverse events, with an occurrence rate of 12.73%, while the control group experienced 17 adverse events, with an occurrence rate of 30.91%. The occurrence rate of adverse events in the WeChat group was significantly lower than that in the control group, showing a statistically significant difference (Pâ <â .05). The hope level scores before intervention in the 2 groups were compared (Pâ >â .05). Compared to before intervention, both groups showed an increase in scores for life attitude, proactive behavior, intimate relationships, and total scores. The WeChat group had higher scores after intervention compared to the control group (Pâ <â .05). The coping strategy scores before intervention in the 2 groups were compared (Pâ >â .05). Compared to before intervention, both groups showed an increase in facing scores and a decrease in avoidance and resignation scores (Pâ <â .05). After intervention, the WeChat group had higher facing scores and lower avoidance and resignation scores compared to the control group (Pâ <â .05). The overall chemotherapy compliance in the WeChat group was higher than that in the control group (Pâ <â .05). Psychological counseling intervention based on the WeChat platform can improve the level of hope, promote patients to face the disease with a positive attitude, increase chemotherapy compliance, and reduce the occurrence of adverse events in patients with gastrointestinal tumors undergoing chemotherapy with completely implanted venous infusion ports.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Consejo , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/terapia , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Consejo/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Adaptación PsicológicaRESUMEN
Background: Fear of cancer recurrence (FCR), cancer-distress, depression, and anxiety are prevalent concerns among women with gynecologic and other understudied cancers, especially among women of color and lower socioeconomic status (SES). Evidence indicates that mind-body interventions are effective in reducing such distress. This study evaluates (1) proof-of-concept of an integrated group yoga and psychological intervention in alleviating distress among women with gynecologic, gastrointestinal, and thoracic cancers and (2) differences in efficacy across social and economic factors. Methods: One hundred twenty-five participants were enrolled in a 10-week, single-arm, integrated group intervention utilizing mindfulness meditation, psychotherapy skills, and yoga. They completed measures of FCR, cancer-distress, depression, and anxiety at baseline and following intervention. Mixed-linear models evaluated change in outcomes across the intervention and moderating effects of age, minority status, and SES among 51 participants with available data. Results: Reductions in total (b = -2.06, P = .012) and somatic depressive symptoms (b = -1.79, P = .002) and state anxiety (b = -6.21, P = .005) were observed across the sample. Higher SES was associated with greater reductions in psychosocial distress related to FCR (b = -0.74, P = .050), and in total (b = -1.06, P = .049) and affective depressive symptoms (b = -0.76, P = .006). Women of color experienced greater declines in somatic symptoms compared to non-Hispanic White women (b = -2.71, P = .031), with women of color experiencing lower SES exhibiting greatest reduction in these symptoms (b = 1.73, P = .026). Conclusions: This study demonstrates proof-of-concept that an integrated psychological and yoga intervention may reduce depressive symptoms and state anxiety among women with gynecologic, gastrointestinal, and thoracic cancers, with racial and/or ethnic minority status and SES moderating some of these effects. Future research should examine intervention feasibility and acceptability among diverse women with cancer and evaluate efficacy using a randomized controlled trial design.Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03385577.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad , Depresión , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos , Atención Plena , Yoga , Adulto , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ansiedad/psicología , Ansiedad/terapia , Depresión/psicología , Depresión/terapia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/terapia , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/psicología , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/terapia , Meditación/psicología , Meditación/métodos , Atención Plena/métodos , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/psicología , Distrés Psicológico , Intervención Psicosocial/métodos , Estrés Psicológico/terapia , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Neoplasias Torácicas/psicología , Neoplasias Torácicas/terapia , Yoga/psicología , Prueba de Estudio ConceptualRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Upper gastrointestinal cancers (UGICs) are increasingly prevalent. With a poor prognosis and significant longer-term effects, UGICs present significant adjustment challenges for individuals with cancer and their informal caregivers. However, the supportive care needs of these informal caregivers are largely unknown. This systematic review of qualitative studies synthesises and critically evaluates the current evidence base on the experience of informal caregivers of individuals with UGIC. METHODS: A Joanna Briggs Institute systematic review was conducted. Searches were performed in four databases (MEDLINE, PsycINFO, Embase, CINAHL) from database inception to February 2021. Included studies explored experiences of informal caregivers of individuals diagnosed with primary cancer of the oesophagus, stomach, pancreas, bile duct, gallbladder, or liver. Studies were independently screened for eligibility and included studies were appraised for quality by two reviewers. Data were extracted and synthesised using meta-aggregation. RESULTS: 19 papers were included in this review, and 328 findings were extracted. These were aggregated into 16 categories across three findings: (1) UGIC caregiver burden; UGIC caregivers undertake extensive responsibilities, especially around patient diet as digestion is severely impacted by UGICs. (2) Mediators of caregiver burden; The nature of UGICs, characterised by disruptive life changes for caregivers, was identified as a mediator for caregiver burden. (3) Consequences of caregiver burden: UGIC caregivers' experiences were shaped by unmet needs, a lack of information and a general decline in social interaction. CONCLUSIONS: The findings of this review suggest the need for a cultural shift within health services. Caregiving for UGIC patients is suggested to adversely affect caregivers' quality of life, similarly to other cancer caregiving populations and therefore they should be better incorporated as co-clients in care-planning and execution by including them in discussions about the patient's diagnosis, treatment options, and potential side effects.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Humanos , Cuidadores/psicología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Carga del Cuidador/psicología , Investigación Cualitativa , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aims to use structural equation modeling to explore the pathways and effect sizes of factors influencing the adherence of postoperative patients with digestive tract tumor to oral nutritional supplements, providing a theoretical basis for future nursing intervention measures. METHODS: A total of 300 postoperative patients with digestive tract tumor within 30 days after surgery were conveniently sampled. Surveys were conducted using a General Information Questionnaire, Morisky Medication Adherence Scale, Digestive System Tumor Patient Nutrition Knowledge-Attitude-Behavior Questionnaire, Multidimensional Social Perception Scale, Beliefs about Medical Questionnaire, and General Self-Efficacy Scale. Structural equation modeling was employed to analyze the factors and pathways affecting adherence with oral nutritional supplements. RESULTS: The adherence score of postoperative patients with digestive tract tumor to oral nutritional supplements was 1.61 ± 1.38. The structural equation model had a good fit (χ2/df = 2.685, GFI = 0.930, CFI = 0.913, AGFI = 0.887, IFI = 0.915, and RMSEA = 0.075). Nutrition knowledge, social support, medication beliefs, and self-efficacy were found to be factors influencing adherence with oral nutritional supplements in postoperative patients with digestive tract tumor, with total effects of 0.539, 0.264, 0.215, and 0.180, respectively. Nutrition knowledge indirectly affected adherence through self-efficacy and medication beliefs, while social support indirectly affected adherence through self-efficacy. CONCLUSION: Adherence with oral nutritional supplements in postoperative patients with digestive tract tumor is at a low level. Improving social support, enhancing patients nutrition knowledge, increasing self-efficacy, and strengthening medication beliefs are effective ways to improve patient adherence.
Asunto(s)
Suplementos Dietéticos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Autoeficacia , Humanos , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cumplimiento de la Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano , Adulto , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/cirugía , Neoplasias del Sistema Digestivo/psicología , Apoyo Social , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Periodo PosoperatorioRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The escalating incidence of cancer and the concurrent rise in mental health issues necessitate investigation into the potential for psychological factors to impede timely and effective treatment. This study examines the association between defense mechanism styles and disease progression, specifically focusing on clinical staging, in patients diagnosed with gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. METHODS: Employing a descriptive correlational design, the study recruited 205 patients with GI cancer admitted to Javad Al-Aeme Hospital in Kerman, Iran, during the year 2022. Convenience sampling was utilized for participant selection. Data collection instruments included the Defense Style Questionnaire-40 (DSQ-40) and patients' documented clinical stage information. Correlation coefficients and ordinal logistic regression were employed for data analysis. RESULTS: Over half of 205 GI cancer patients were female (53.2%). The majority were married (85.8%) with an average age of 53.86 ± 8.21 years. Nearly a quarter (23.9%) were in disease stage 1, with similar proportions in stages 2 (25.4%), 3 (27.3%), and 4 (23.4%). The findings revealed a significant inverse correlation between mature defense mechanism styles and clinical stage (r = - 0.55, p < 0.001), indicating that patients who employed more adaptive defense mechanisms had lower-stage cancer. Conversely, a significant positive correlation was observed between immature defense mechanism styles and clinical stage (r = - 0.49, p < 0.001), suggesting that patients who relied on less effective defense mechanisms had more advanced-stage cancer. However, no significant association was found between neurotic defense mechanism styles and clinical stage (r = - 0.12, p = 0.079). CONCLUSIONS: This study provides preliminary evidence that defense mechanism styles are associated with disease progression in patients with GI cancer. Mature defense mechanisms may promote slower disease progression, while immature defense mechanisms may contribute to more advanced disease stages. Further research is needed to confirm these findings and develop interventions to improve psychological well-being in this patient population.
Asunto(s)
Mecanismos de Defensa , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/patología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Irán/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , AncianoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The primary aim of specialised palliative care (SPC) is to improve the quality of life (QoL) for patients with a high symptom burden from a life-threatening disease. This randomised study aimed to assess the QoL impact of early integration of SPC alongside tumour-specific palliative treatment in patients with gastrointestinal (GI) cancers. METHODS: We randomly assigned ambulatory patients with advanced GI cancer to early integration of SPC and palliative tumour-specific treatment or tumour-specific treatment alone. The primary endpoint was QoL assessed at baseline and every sixth week using the Functional Assessment of Cancer Therapy-General (FACT-G) questionnaire. RESULTS: A total of 118 patients were randomised. The difference in total FACT-G score between patients assigned to early integration with SPC and controls was 5.2 points (95% CI: -0.1 to 10.5, p = 0.216), 6.7 points (95% CI: 0.2 to 13.3, p = 0.172), and 13 points (95% CI: 5.7 to 20.2, p = 0.004) at weeks 6, 12, and 24, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: This prospective randomised trial strengthens the argument for early integration of SPC with tumour-specific treatment in patients with advanced GI cancers. We found an improved QoL for patients with advanced GI cancer 24 weeks after randomisation to early integration of home-based SPC. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov (ref: NCT02246725).
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Servicios de Atención de Salud a Domicilio , Cuidados Paliativos , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/terapia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Masculino , Femenino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Anciano de 80 o más Años , AdultoRESUMEN
Early integrated palliative care (EIPC) for patients with advanced cancers requires the involvement of family doctors (FDs) and oncologists. We compared attitudes between patients and their providers regarding the delivery of EIPC. Patients with newly diagnosed incurable gastrointestinal (GI) cancer at a tertiary cancer centre in Ontario, Canada, were surveyed using a study-specific instrument regarding the importance of and preferences for accessing support across eight domains of palliative care. Physicians within the circle of care completed a parallel survey for each patient. The concordance between patient and physician responses was analyzed. A total of 66 patients were surveyed (median age 69, 35% female). All had an oncologist, 12% had a specialist palliative care provider (SPC), and 97% had an FD, but only 41% listed the FD as part of the care team. In total, 95 providers responded (oncologist = 68, FD = 21, SPC = 6; response rate 92%; 1-3 physician responses per patient). Disease management and physical concerns were most important to patients. Patients preferred to access care in these domains from oncologists or SPCs. For all other domains, most patients attributed primary responsibility to self or family rather than any healthcare provider. Thus, concordance was poor between patient and physician responses. Across most domains of palliative care, we found low agreement between cancer patients and their physicians regarding responsibilities for care, with FDs appearing to have limited involvement at this stage.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Cuidados Paliativos , Humanos , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/terapia , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Prioridad del Paciente , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , OntarioRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To investigate the effects of combined exercise on fatigue, anxiety, depression, quality of life and physical functioning in gastroinstestinal neoplasm in people under chemotherapy with oxaliplatin treatment. METHODS: We searched pubmed/MEDLINE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, PEDro data base, and SciELO (until Nov 2023) for randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of combined exercise in gastroinstestinal neoplasm people under chemotherapy with oxaliplatin treatment. Two comparisons were made: combined exercise versus usual care, combined aerobic and versus usual care (follow up). The main outcomes were muscle strength, aerobic capacity, fatigue, anxiety, depression and quality of life. Mean differences (MD) with 95% confidence interval (CI) were calculated. RESULTS: Seven randomized controlled trials met the eligibility criteria, which included 464 people. Compared to usual care, combined aerobic and resistance resulted in decrease of general fatigue (-2.82; IC: 4.92 to -0.69, N = 48), physical fatigue (-5.08; IC: 8.41 to -1.74, N = 48) and improvement of domain physical functioning of quality of life (9.40; IC: 2.74 to 16.06, N = 48). Compared to usual care, combined aerobic and resistance - Follow up resulted in decrease of general fatigue (-2.32; IC: 4.41 to - 0.28, N = 48), physical fatigue (-0.92; IC: 3.31 to -1.47, N = 48) and improvement ofdomain physical functioning of (9.83; IC: 0.66 to 19.01, N = 48). CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrate that combined exercises improves fatigue (general; physical), domain physical functioning of quality of life in gastrointestinal neoplasm people under chemotherapy treatment when compared to usual care.
Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos , Terapia por Ejercicio , Fatiga , Oxaliplatino , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Fatiga/terapia , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodos , Fuerza Muscular/fisiología , Depresión , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Ansiedad , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Patients with advanced gynecologic (GYN) and gastrointestinal (GI) cancers frequently develop peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC), which limits prognosis and diminishes health-related quality of life (HRQoL). Palliative procedures may improve PC symptoms, yet patients and caregivers report feeling unprepared to manage ostomies, catheters, and other complex needs. Our objectives were to (1) assess the feasibility of an efficacy trial of a nurse-led telehealth intervention (BOLSTER) for patients with PC and their caregivers; and (2) assess BOLSTER's acceptability, potential to improve patients' HRQoL and self-efficacy, and potential impact on advance care planning (ACP). METHODS: Pilot feasibility RCT. Recently hospitalized adults with advanced GYN and GI cancers, PC, and a new complex care need and their caregivers were randomized 1:1 to BOLSTER or enhanced discharge planning (EDP). We defined feasibility as a ≥ 50% approach-to-consent ratio and acceptability as ≥70% satisfaction with BOLSTER. We assessed patients' HRQoL and self-efficacy at baseline and six weeks, then compared the proportion experiencing meaningful improvements by arm. ACP documentation was identified using natural language processing. RESULTS: We consented 77% of approached patients. In the BOLSTER arm, 91.0% of patients and 100.0% of caregivers were satisfied. Compared to EDP, more patients receiving BOLSTER experienced improvements in HRQoL (68.4% vs. 40.0%) and self-efficacy for managing symptoms (78.9% vs. 35.0%) and treatment (52.9% vs. 42.9%). The BOLSTER arm had more ACP documentation. CONCLUSIONS: BOLSTER is a feasible and acceptable intervention with the potential to improve patients' HRQoL and promote ACP. An efficacy trial comparing BOLSTER to usual care is underway. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03367247; PI: Wright.
Asunto(s)
Cuidadores , Estudios de Factibilidad , Neoplasias Peritoneales , Calidad de Vida , Telemedicina , Humanos , Femenino , Proyectos Piloto , Neoplasias Peritoneales/secundario , Neoplasias Peritoneales/psicología , Neoplasias Peritoneales/enfermería , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cuidadores/psicología , Anciano , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/enfermería , Neoplasias de los Genitales Femeninos/psicología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/enfermería , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Adulto , Autoeficacia , Planificación Anticipada de Atención , Aceptación de la Atención de SaludRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Although the risk of CVD is increased in cancer survivors, few studies have investigated the CVD risk in survivors of gastrointestinal (GI) cancer. Therefore, we evaluated the CVD risk using the 10-year atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD) risk score for GI cancer survivors and associated physical activity factors. METHODS: Using the 2014-2019 Korean National Health and Nutrition Examination Surveys, data were collected for 262 GI cancer survivors and 1,310 cancer-free controls matched at a 1:5 ratio based on age and sex. The International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short-Form was used to assess physical activity, and the Euro QoL Questionnaire 5-Dimensional Classification (EQ-5D) was used to assess the health-related quality of life. RESULTS: A multiple logistic regression analysis demonstrated a lower risk of ASCVD in GI cancer survivors than in controls (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 0.73, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 0.55-0.97). Moreover, the risk of having a high ASCVD score was significantly lower in individuals who performed sufficient aerobic physical activity (aOR = 0.59, 95% CI = 0.47-0.75) and those with an EQ-5D score 1 or 2 (aOR = 0.36, 95% CI = 0.20-0.65 and aOR = 0.31, 95% CI = 0.16-0.58, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: This population-based study demonstrated that engaging in sufficient physical activity can reduce the ASCVD risk among GI cancer survivors.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares , Ejercicio Físico , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Encuestas Nutricionales , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , República de Corea/epidemiología , Enfermedades Cardiovasculares/epidemiología , Anciano , Adulto , Calidad de Vida , Factores de Riesgo , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Medición de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Intrinsic capacity (IC) was introduced by the World Health Organization (WHO) as a marker of healthy aging, and is defined as the combination of an individual's physical, mental, and psychological capacities. This study aimed to assess IC via a patient-reported geriatric assessment (GA) and evaluate its association with survival among older adults with gastrointestinal (GI) malignancies. METHODS: Data were used from a single-institution prospective registry of older adults undergoing GA before cancer therapy. Key domains of IC (vitality, locomotion, and sensory [hearing and visual], psychological, and cognitive capacities) were captured via GA, and each was given a score of 0 or 1 (0, impaired) to compute the total IC score (range, 0-6, where 6 indicates no impairment and ≤5 indicates impairment in ≥1 domains). A frailty index (FI) was measured via the deficit accumulation method. Cox regression models and Kaplan-Meier curves were used to examine the impact of IC impairment on survival. RESULTS: The study included 665 patients; the median age was 68 years, 57.4% were men, and 72.9% were White. The median IC score was 4, and 79.3% of participants showed impairment in ≥1 domains of IC. Most commonly impaired domains were locomotion (48.7%) and vitality (43.9%). IC was inversely associated with FI (Spearman coefficient, -0.75; p < .001). IC impairment was associated with inferior overall survival (score, 4-5: adjusted hazard ratio [aHR], 1.7; 95% CI, 1.11-2.48; score, 2-3: aHR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.30-2.85; score, 0-1: aHR, 1.9; 95% CI, 1.11-2.48). CONCLUSIONS: IC impairment is associated with frailty and reduced overall survival in older patients with GI malignancies. GA can be used to screen for IC impairment as recommended by the WHO. PLAIN LANGUAGE SUMMARY: The World Health Organization introduced intrinsic capacity as a marker of healthy aging. Intrinsic capacity is the combination of an individual's physical, mental, and psychological capacities. It contains six key domains: vitality, locomotion, and sensory (hearing and visual), psychological, and cognitive capacities. Older adults with cancer are susceptible to a decrease in intrinsic capacity as a result of cancer and the aging process. In this study, we aimed to assess the intrinsic capacity for patients with gastrointestinal cancer and also identify whether there exists any association of intrinsic capacity with overall survival. We identified that approximately 80% of this population had one or more impaired domains, and more intrinsic capacity impairment was associated with reduced overall survival.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Evaluación Geriátrica , Sistema de Registros , Humanos , Anciano , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/mortalidad , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Prospectivos , Fragilidad/epidemiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Envejecimiento/psicología , Envejecimiento/fisiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Surgery is essential for gastrointestinal (GI) cancer treatment. Many patients lack access to surgical care that optimizes outcomes. Scarce availability and/or low accessibility of appropriate resources may be the reason for this, especially in economically disadvantaged areas. This study aimed to investigate providers' and survivors' perspectives on barriers and facilitators to the availability and accessibility of surgical care. METHODS: Semistructured interviews informed by surgical disparities and access-to-care conceptual frameworks with purposively selected GI cancer providers and survivors in Alabama and Mississippi were conducted. Survivors were within 3 years of diagnosis of stage I to III esophageal, pancreatic, or colorectal cancer. Transcripts were analyzed using inductive thematic and content analysis techniques. Intercoder agreement was reached at 90 %. RESULTS: The 27 providers included surgeons (n = 11), medical oncologists (n = 2), radiation oncologists (n = 2), a primary care physician (n = 1), nurses (n = 8), and patient navigators (n = 3). This study included 36 survivors with ages ranging from 44 to 87 years. Of the 36 survivors, 21 (58.3 %) were male, and 11 (30.6 %) identified as Black. Responses were grouped into 3 broad categories: (i) transportation/geographic location, (ii) specialized care/testing, and (iii) patient-/provider-related factors. The barriers included lack and cost of transportation, reluctance to travel because of uneasiness with urban centers, low availability of specialized care, overburdened referral centers, provider-related referral biases, and low health literacy. Facilitators included availability of charitable aid, centralizing multidisciplinary care, and efficient appointment scheduling. CONCLUSION: In the Deep South, barriers and facilitators to the availability and accessibility of GI surgical cancer care were identified at the health system, provider, and patient levels, especially for rural residents. Our data suggest targets for improving the use of surgery in GI cancer care.
Asunto(s)
Supervivientes de Cáncer , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Humanos , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Anciano , Supervivientes de Cáncer/psicología , Supervivientes de Cáncer/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Alabama , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/cirugía , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Mississippi , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos/psicología , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/cirugía , Navegación de Pacientes/organización & administración , Médicos de Atención Primaria/psicología , Médicos de Atención Primaria/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Psychological distress is a prevalent unpleasant experience faced by many cancer patients. However, the psychological distress among gastrointestinal (GI) cancer patients is scarcely explored. Moreover, the association between psychological distress and quality of life in different genders has yet to be explored. AIMS: To explore the psychological distress among GI cancer patients and examine its association with quality of life among different genders. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional study. A total of 237 gastrointestinal cancer patients completed the distress thermometer and the Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-General. RESULTS: The mean score of psychological distress of the participants was 3.04 (SD = 2.90). A greater proportion of female gastrointestinal cancer patients (52.8%) had clinically relevant psychological distress compared to males (35.9%). The quality of life was negatively associated with their psychological distress (B = - 1.502, 95%CI: - 2.759 to - 0.245, p = 0.019) among gastrointestinal cancer patients. Such association was stronger among males compared to females in gastrointestinal cancer patients (Interaction term, B = - 1.713, 95%CI: - 3.123 to - 0.303, p = 0.017). CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that healthcare providers should attach their attention to gastrointestinal cancer patients' psychological distress, especially females. Longitudinal studies could adopted to track the changes in psychological distress and its association with quality of life over time among different genders. In future intervention studies, the focus of psychological interventions needs to be gender-specific.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Distrés Psicológico , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Masculino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores Sexuales , Anciano , Adulto , Estrés Psicológico/epidemiología , Estrés Psicológico/etiología , Estrés Psicológico/psicología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gastrointestinal (GI) cancer burden in Asia is increasing, and Vietnam is no exception. Assessing the affordability of achieving a quality-adjusted life year (QALY) in gastrointestinal cancer patients Vietnam, as well as identifying predictors of willingness to pay (WTP) per QALY, is crucial to decision-making around medical intervention prioritization and performing medical technology assessments for these cancers. OBJECTIVES: Our study aimed to estimate WTP/QALY gained and associated factors among patients diagnosed with GI cancer at a tertiary hospital in Hue, Vietnam. METHODS: A cross-sectional descriptive study, using contingent valuation methodology was conducted among 231 patients at tertiary hospital in 2022. A double limited dichotomous choice and the EQ-5D-5L were utilised to estimate WTP and QALY, respectively. Quantile regression was applied to determine predictors of WTP/QALY. RESULTS: The mean and median maximum WTP/QALY gained among GI patients was $15,165.6 (42,239.6) and $4,365.6 (IQR: 1,586.5-14,552.0), respectively, which was equal to 3.68 times the 2022 gross domestic product (GDP) per capita in Vietnam. Additionally, cancer severity was found to have a significant impact on WTP per QALY gained, with a higher amount identified among patients with earlier stages of GI cancer. Furthermore, living in an urban dwelling and patients' treatment modalities were significantly associated with WTP/QALY. CONCLUSION: Evidence from our study can be used to inform how decision-makers in Vietnam to determine the cost-effectiveness of GI cancer interventions.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Centros de Atención Terciaria , Humanos , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/economía , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/terapia , Masculino , Centros de Atención Terciaria/economía , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Vietnam , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Pronóstico , Estudios de Seguimiento , Calidad de Vida , AdultoRESUMEN
Reminiscence therapy (RT) attenuates psychological disorders in cancer patients. This study aimed to evaluate the effect of RT on anxiety, depression, spiritual well-being, and quality of life in elderly patients with unresectable, metastatic gastrointestinal cancer. A total of 222 elderly patients with unresectable, metastatic gastrointestinal cancer were randomized into RT group (RT plus usual care, n=112) or control group (usual care, n=110) with a 6-month intervention. Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale for Anxiety (HADS-A) and Depression (HADS-D), Functional Assessment of Chronic Illness Therapy-Spiritual Well-Being Scale (FACIT-Sp), and Quality of Life Questionnaire-Core 30 (QLQ-C30) were evaluated at month (M)0, M1, M3, and M6. Concerning the primary outcome, HADS-A score at M6 decreased in the RT group compared to the control group (P=0.005). As to secondary outcomes, the RT group showed decreased HADS-A scores at M3, anxiety rate at M3, HADS-D scores at M3 and M6, depression rate at M6, as well as greater FACIT-Sp scores at M1, M3, and M6 vs the control group (all P<0.050). Additionally, QLQ-C30 global health score was elevated at M1 (P=0.046) and M6 (P=0.005), functions score was greater at M6 (P=0.038), and symptoms score was lower at M3 (P=0.019) in the RT group than in the control group. Subgroup analysis revealed that the addition of RT was more effective for patients with anxiety or depression at baseline. In summary, RT alleviated anxiety and depression, and improved the spiritual well-being and quality of life within 6 months in elderly patients with unresectable, metastatic gastrointestinal cancer.
Asunto(s)
Ansiedad , Depresión , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Salud Mental , Calidad de Vida , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/terapia , Anciano , Ansiedad/terapia , Depresión/terapia , Resultado del Tratamiento , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Escalas de Valoración Psiquiátrica , Psicoterapia/métodosRESUMEN
Chinese patients face higher risks of gastrointestinal (GI) cancers and greater cancer-related deaths than Canadian-born patients. The older population encounters barriers to quality healthcare, impacting their well-being and survival. Previous studies highlighted Chinese immigrant perceptions of not requiring healthcare support. During the COVID-19 pandemic, their underutilization of healthcare services garnered attention. The present study explores the experiences of older Chinese cancer patients to improve culturally sensitive cancer care. A total of twenty interviews carried out in Cantonese and Mandarin were conducted with Chinese immigrants, aged 60 or above, diagnosed with Stage 3 or 4 GI cancer. These interviews were transcribed verbatim, translated, and subjected to qualitative descriptive analysis. Among older Chinese immigrant patients, a phenomenon termed "Premature Acceptance: Normalizing Death and Dying" was observed. This involved four key themes: 1. acceptance and letting go, 2. family first, 3. self-sufficiency, and 4. barriers to supportive care. Participants displayed an early acceptance of their own mortality, prioritizing family prosperity over their own quality of life. Older Chinese patients normalize the reality of facing death amidst cancer. They adopt a pragmatic outlook, acknowledging life-saving treatments while willingly sacrificing their own support needs to ease family burdens. Efforts to enhance health literacy require culturally sensitive programs tailored to address language barriers and differing values among this population. A strengths-based approach emphasizing family support and practical aspects of care may help build resilience and improve symptom management, thereby enhancing their engagement with healthcare services.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19 , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pueblo Asiatico/psicología , Actitud Frente a la Muerte , Canadá , China/etnología , COVID-19/psicología , Pueblos del Este de Asia , Emigrantes e Inmigrantes/psicología , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Neoplasias/psicología , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Investigación Cualitativa , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
Health-related quality of life (HRQoL) has recently gained importance as treatment options for tumors of the upper GI tract lead to improved long-term survival. HRQoL is often estimated by physicians even though their reliability and the impact of outside factors such as contact time and level of medical education is unclear. Therefore, in this study we investigated the correlation between physicians', students', and patients' assessment of HRQoL. 54 patients presenting with tumors of the upper GI tract were included and asked to fill out the standardized HRQoL questionnaires EORTC QLQ-C30 and QLQ-OG25. Attending physicians and medical students filled out the same questionnaires through estimation of patients' HRQoL. Correlation was assessed through Pearson's and Kendall's τb coefficients. Physicians' and patients' assessments correlated for one out of six of the functional and a third of the symptom scores. Students' and patients' assessments correlated for one third of the functional and two thirds of the symptom scores. Students tended to underestimate patients' symptom burden while physicians tended to overestimate it. Physicians failed to correctly assess several pathognomonic symptoms in this study. Students showed higher correlation with patients' symptoms than physicians. Even so, this adds to mounting evidence that shows the benefit of using patient-reported outcomes as a gold standard regarding HRQoL.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gastrointestinales , Médicos , Calidad de Vida , Estudiantes de Medicina , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos/psicología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estudiantes de Medicina/psicología , Adulto , Neoplasias Gastrointestinales/psicología , Tracto Gastrointestinal Superior/patología , Anciano , PercepciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This cross-sectional study explored the associations between intrapersonal and interpersonal emotional competence (EC) and the unmet supportive care needs (SCN), anxiety, and depression of informal caregivers at the beginning of gastrointestinal or haematological cancer care, i.e. during chemotherapy and within 6 months after diagnosis. METHODS: The participants completed a self-reported questionnaire, comprising the Short Profile of Emotional Competence (S-PEC), the SCN survey for partners and caregivers (SCNS-P&C), and the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale (HADS). Multivariate logistic regression models were performed to explore the influence of EC on unmet SCN and the presence of moderate/severe anxiety or depression. RESULTS: Most of the 203 caregivers were women (n = 141, 69.80%) and the partners of patients (n = 148, 73.27%) suffering from gastrointestinal (n = 112, 55.17%) and haematological (n = 91, 44.83%) cancer. Only intrapersonal EC showed a significant influence out of all the dimensions of unmet SCN related to healthcare services and information (odds ratio (OR) = 0.35 [95%CI 0.19; 0.65]), emotional and psychological needs (OR = 0.43 [95%CI 0.25; 0.74]), work and social security (OR = 0.57 [95%CI 0.37; 0.88]), and communication and family support (OR = 0.61 [95%CI 0.39; 0.95]). A one-unit increase in the intrapersonal EC score significantly reduced the probability of anxiety (OR = 0.42, [95%CI 0.26; 0.68]) and depression (OR = 0.34, [95%CI 0.21; 0.55]). CONCLUSION: Intrapersonal EC of caregivers is crucial to reduce the risk of unmet SCN, anxiety, and depression from the beginning of care. Identifying caregivers with lower intrapersonal EC may be necessary to increase vigilance from healthcare professionals and psychologists.