RESUMEN
BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is one of the leading causes of cancer-related death all over the world, and brings a heavy social economic burden especially in China. Several immuno-combination therapies have shown promising efficacy in the first-line treatment of unresectable HCC and are widely used in clinical practice. Nevertheless, which combination is the most affordable one is unknown. Our study assessed the cost-effectiveness of the immuno-combinations as first-line treatment for patients with unresectable HCC from the perspective of Chinese payers. METHODS: A Markov model was built according to five multicenter, phase III, open-label, randomized trials (Himalaya, IMbrave150, ORIENT-32, CARES-310, LEAP-002) to investigate the cost-effectiveness of tremelimumab plus durvalumab (STRIDE), atezolizumab plus bevacizumab (A + B), sintilimab plus bevacizumab biosimilar (IBI305) (S + B), camrelizumab plus rivoceranib (C + R), and pembrolizumab plus lenvatinib (P + L). Three disease states were included: progression free survival (PFS), progressive disease (PD) as well as death. Medical costs were searched from West China Hospital, published literatures or the Red Book. Cost-effectiveness ratios (CERs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were evaluated to compare costs among different combinations. Sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the robust of the model. RESULTS: The total cost and quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) of C + R, S + B, P + L, A + B and STRIDE were $12,109.27 and 0.91, $26,961.60 and 1.12, $55,382.53 and 0.83, $70,985.06 and 0.90, $84,589.01 and 0.73, respectively, resulting in the most cost-effective strategy of C + R with CER of $13,306.89 per QALY followed by S + B with CER of $24,072.86 per QALY. Compared with C + R, the ICER of S + B strategy was $70,725.38 per QALY, which would become the most cost-effective when the willing-to-pay threshold exceeded $73,500/QALY. In the subgroup analysis, with the application of Asia results in Leap-002 trial, the model results were the same as global data. In the sensitivity analysis, with the variation of parameters, the results were robust. CONCLUSION: As one of the promising immuno-combination therapies in the first-line systemic treatment of HCC, camrelizumab plus rivoceranib demonstrated the potential to be the most cost-effective strategy, which warranted further studies to best inform the real-world clinical practices.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Análisis de Costo-Efectividad , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Bevacizumab/economía , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , China/epidemiología , Ensayos Clínicos Fase III como Asunto , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Cadenas de Markov , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/economía , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/economía , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como AsuntoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND The FOHAIC-1 trial showed hepatic arterial infusion chemotherapy with infusional fluorouracil, leucovorin, and oxaliplatin (HAIC-FO) improved survival, compared with sorafenib, in patients with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). The aim of this study was to conduct a cost-effectiveness comparison between HAIC-FO and sorafenib from the perspective of the Chinese healthcare system. MATERIAL AND METHODS The economic evaluation was conducted between July 2023 and February 2024, spanning a 10-year investment horizon. A Markov model was developed to perform a cost-effectiveness analysis of HAIC-FO vs sorafenib. Health states incorporated in the model comprised progression-free disease, progressed disease, and death. Transition probabilities were derived from data obtained from the FOHAIC-1 trial. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER) was calculated to evaluate cost-effectiveness. Additionally, one-way and probabilistic sensitivity analyses assessed the model's robustness. RESULTS The HAIC-FO group accrued a total cost of $22,781, whereas the sorafenib group totaled $18,795. In terms of effectiveness, the HAIC-FO group achieved 1.06 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), whereas the sorafenib group attained 0.65 QALYs. Compared with sorafenib, HAIC-FO yielded an additional 0.41 QALYs at a cost of additional $3,985, resulting in an incremental cost of $9,720 per QALY gained. The one-way sensitivity analysis revealed the final ICER remained below the willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of $30,492 per QALY, when considering parameter fluctuations. Additionally, probabilistic sensitivity analysis indicated a 99.8% probability that the ICER for HAIC-FO compared with sorafenib would fall below the WTP threshold. CONCLUSIONS Compared with sorafenib, HAIC-FO emerged as a cost-effective first-line treatment option for patients facing advanced HCC in China.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Oxaliplatino , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Sorafenib , Humanos , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Sorafenib/economía , Sorafenib/administración & dosificación , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , China , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Oxaliplatino/uso terapéutico , Oxaliplatino/economía , Oxaliplatino/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/economía , Fluorouracilo/uso terapéutico , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Cadenas de Markov , Leucovorina/economía , Leucovorina/uso terapéutico , Arteria Hepática , Infusiones Intraarteriales/economía , Masculino , Antineoplásicos/economía , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Análisis de Costo-EfectividadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: New cancer diagnoses are associated with employment decrease, workplace absenteeism, and attributable costs to employers. OBJECTIVE: To estimate the workplace productivity loss in the year following a new diagnosis of early-, intermediate-, or advanced-stage hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in commercially insured US adults. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study using Merative MarketScan commercial claims to identify incident HCC diagnoses from 2010 to 2020. Patients were stratified into early-, intermediate-, or advanced-stage cohorts based on presence of secondary malignancy codes or first treatment received. Mean workdays lost and attributable cost in the year following a new diagnosis were calculated using the Kaplan-Meier sample averages to account for censoring. An exploratory analysis was conducted on subgroups in the early and advanced cohorts to assess productivity loss in patients with and without treatment. RESULTS: Mean workdays lost in the year following a new HCC diagnosis among the early, intermediate, and advanced cohorts was 22.6 days (95% CI = 16.0-29.8), 17.4 days (95% CI = 11.9-23.2), and 19.5 days (95% CI = 15.6-23.6), respectively. Corresponding indirect costs were $6,031(95% CI = $4,270-$7,953), $4,644 (95% CI = $3,176-$6,192), and $5,204 (95% CI = $4,163-$6,298). Early-stage patients without a liver transplant and advanced-stage patients who received systemic therapy had 19.7 (95% CI = 12.7-27.4) and 22.0 (95% CI = 16.6-27.7) mean workdays lost, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Productivity loss varies by stage and appears to be higher in early-stage patients who receive more intensive treatments in the first year following a new HCC diagnosis.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Bases de Datos Factuales , Eficiencia , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Estados Unidos , Absentismo , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Revisión de Utilización de Seguros , Adulto Joven , Costo de EnfermedadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High financial burden for patients has been reported for multiple types of cancer, but there are limited data in those with HCC. We aimed to describe the financial burden for patients diagnosed with HCC and identify correlates of high financial burden. METHODS: We used the IQVIA PharMetrics Plus for Academics database to identify commercially insured patients diagnosed with HCC between 2006 and 2021. Patient financial liability was defined as the difference between allowed and paid amounts from adjudicated insurance claims. We reported total and HCC-related financial liabilities (i.e., cost for HCC-related claims), with high total financial liability defined as ≥$3000 annually and high HCC-related financial liability as ≥$1000 annually. We used multivariable logistic regression modeling to identify factors associated with high total and HCC-related financial liability. RESULTS: Among 11,609 patients with HCC, the median total financial liability during the year after HCC diagnosis was $2955 (Q1-Q3: $972-$6293). Nearly half (45%) of patients experienced high total financial liability, with the greatest liability incurred in the 3-month period immediately following HCC diagnosis. Older age, increased comorbidity, and cirrhosis-related complications were associated with higher total patient liability. Patient liability also varied by type of HCC treatment, with systemic therapy and liver transplantation having the highest financial liability in multivariable analysis. However, only 66.7% of the patients experienced HCC-related liability. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with HCC experience significant financial liability underscoring a need for price transparency as well as financial counseling in this population.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Costo de Enfermedad , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Masculino , Femenino , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estados Unidos , Anciano , Adulto , Estudios de Cohortes , Bases de Datos FactualesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The IWATE criteria, a four-level classification system for laparoscopic hepatectomy, measures technical complexity but lacks studies on its impact on outcomes and costs, especially in robotic surgeries. This study evaluated the effects of technical complexity on perioperative outcomes and costs in robotic hepatectomy. METHODS: Since 2013, we prospectively followed 500 patients who underwent robotic hepatectomy. Patients were classified into four levels of IWATE scores; (low [0-3], intermediate [4-6], advanced [7-9], and expert [10-12]) determined by tumor characteristics, liver function and resection extent. Perioperative variables were analyzed with significance accepted at a p-value ≤.05. RESULTS: Among 500 patients, 337 (67%) underwent advanced to expert-level operations. Median operative duration was 213 min (range: 16-817 min; mean ± SD: 240 ± 116.1 min; p < .001) and estimated blood loss (EBL) was 95 mL (range: 0-3500 mL; mean ± SD:142 ± 171.1 mL; p < .001). Both operative duration and EBL showed positive correlations with increasing IWATE scores. Median length of stay (LOS) of 3 days (range: 0-34; mean ± SD:4 ± 3.0 days; p < .001) significantly correlated with IWATE score. Total cost of $25 388 (range: $84-354 407; mean ± SD: 29752 ± 20106.8; p < .001) also significantly correlated with operative complexity, however hospital reimbursement did not. No correlation was found between IWATE score and postoperative complications or mortality. CONCLUSIONS: Clinical variables such as operative duration, EBL, and LOS correlate with IWATE difficulty scores in robotic hepatectomy. Financial metrics such as costs but not reimbursement received by the hospital correlate with IWATE scores.
Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía , Laparoscopía , Tiempo de Internación , Tempo Operativo , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Hepatectomía/economía , Hepatectomía/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Laparoscopía/economía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Resultado del Tratamiento , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: This study aims to explore the cost-effectiveness of atezolizumab plus bevacizumab against sorafenib for first-line treatment of locally advanced or metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) in Singapore. METHODS: A partitioned survival model was developed from a healthcare system perspective, with a 10-year lifetime horizon. Clinical inputs and utilities were obtained from the IMbrave150 trial. Healthcare resource use costs were obtained from published local sources; drug costs reflected the most recent public hospital selling prices. Outcomes included life years, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs) and incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs). Deterministic and probabilistic sensitivity analyses were performed to assess the model's robustness. RESULTS: Atezolizumab plus bevacizumab offered an additional 1.42 life years and 1.09 QALYs, with an additional cost of S$111,847; the ICER was S$102,988/QALY. The World Health Organization considers interventions with ICERs <1 gross domestic product (GDP)/capita to be highly cost-effective. At a willingness-to-pay (WTP) threshold of S$114,165/QALY (Singapore's 2022 GDP/capita), atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is cost-effective compared with sorafenib. The ICER was most sensitive to variations in utilities, but all parameter variations had no significant impact on the model outcomes. CONCLUSION: At a WTP threshold of Singapore's GDP/capita, atezolizumab plus bevacizumab is cost-effective compared with sorafenib.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bevacizumab , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Sorafenib , Humanos , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Bevacizumab/economía , Sorafenib/administración & dosificación , Sorafenib/economía , Singapur , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Costos de los Medicamentos , Análisis de Costo-EfectividadRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Atezolizumab (ATZ) plus bevacizumab (BVC) co-administration is one of the newest systemic interventions in advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (AHCC). This treatment approach is more costly and effective than other therapeutic interventions, significantly improving AHCC survival and health-related quality of life. AIM: This economic study aimed to systematically review all cost-effectiveness analyses of ATZ/BVC combination in AHCC. METHOD: A comprehensive search in scientific databases was performed using a highly sensitive syntax to find all related economic evaluations. The target population was AHCC patients. The intervention was ATZ/BVC, which was compared with sorafenib, nivolumab, and other anticancer strategies. We included studies that reported quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and/or life-years, costs, and incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), and finally, the characteristics of included studies were categorized. RESULTS: Out of 315 identified records, 12 cost-effectiveness analyses were eligible for inclusion in the systematic review. Treatment costs were significantly higher with ATZ/BVC in all studies (from 61,397 to 253,687 USD/patient compared to sorafenib and nivolumab, respectively). Incremental QALYs/patient varied from 0.35 to 0.86 compared to sintilimab/BVC and sorafenib. Although ICERs for drugs varied widely, all were united in the lack of cost-effectiveness of the ATZ/BVC. The willingness-to-pay threshold in all studies was lower than the ICER, which indicated a reluctance to pay for this treatment strategy by the health systems. CONCLUSION: The ATZ/BVC combination is an expensive targeted immunotherapy in AHCC. Significant discounts in ATZ and BVC prices are essential for this novel approach to be cost-effective and extensively used.
Asunto(s)
Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Bevacizumab , Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Bevacizumab/economía , Bevacizumab/uso terapéutico , Bevacizumab/administración & dosificación , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/economía , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/uso terapéutico , Anticuerpos Monoclonales Humanizados/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/economía , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As the first comprehensive investigation into hospital readmissions following robotic hepatectomy for neoplastic disease, this study aims to fill a critical knowledge gap by evaluating risk factors associated with readmission and their impact on survival and the financial burden. METHODS: The study analyzed a database of robotic hepatectomy patients, comparing readmitted and non-readmitted individuals post-operatively using 1:1 propensity score matching. Statistical methods included Chi-square, Mann-Whitney U, T-test, binomial logistic regression, and Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Among 244 patients, 44 were readmitted within 90 days. Risk factors included hypertension (p â= â0.01), increased Child-Pugh score (p â< â0.01), and R1 margin status (p â= â0.05). Neoadjuvant chemotherapy correlated with lower readmission risk (p â= â0.045). Readmissions didn't significantly impact five-year survival (p â= â0.42) but increased fixed indirect hospital costs (p â< â0.01). CONCLUSIONS: Readmission post-robotic hepatectomy correlates with hypertension, higher Child-Pugh scores, and R1 margins. The use of neoadjuvant chemotherapy was associated with a lower admission rate due to less diffuse liver disease in these patients. While not affecting survival, readmissions elevate healthcare costs.
Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Readmisión del Paciente , Puntaje de Propensión , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Readmisión del Paciente/economía , Hepatectomía/economía , Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Anciano , Modelos Logísticos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , AdultoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Ultrasound (US) is associated with severe visualization limitations (US Liver Imaging Reporting and Data System visualization score C) in one-third of patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) cirrhosis undergoing hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) screening. Data suggest abbreviated MRI (aMRI) may improve HCC screening efficacy. This study analyzed the cost-effectiveness of HCC screening strategies, including an US visualization score-based approach with aMRI, in patients with NAFLD cirrhosis. METHODS: We constructed a Markov model simulating adults with compensated NAFLD cirrhosis in the United States undergoing HCC screening, comparing strategies of US plus visualization score, US alone, or no surveillance. We modeled aMRI in patients with visualization score C and negative US, while patients with scores A/B did US alone. We performed a sensitivity analysis comparing US plus visualization score with US plus alpha fetoprotein or no surveillance. The primary outcome was the incremental cost-effectiveness ratio (ICER), with a willingness-to-pay threshold of $100,000 per quality-adjusted life-year. Sensitivity analyses were performed for all variables. RESULTS: US plus visualization score was the most cost-effective strategy, with an ICER of $59,005 relative to no surveillance. The ICER for US alone to US plus visualization score was $822,500. On sensitivity analysis, screening using US plus visualization score remained preferred across several parameters. Even with alpha fetoprotein added to US, the US plus visualization score strategy remained cost-effective, with an ICER of $62,799 compared with no surveillance. DISCUSSION: HCC surveillance using US visualization score-based approach, using aMRI for visualization score C, seems to be the most cost-effective strategy in patients with NAFLD cirrhosis.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Cirrosis Hepática , Neoplasias Hepáticas , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Cadenas de Markov , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , Ultrasonografía , Humanos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico por imagen , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/complicaciones , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/economía , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética/métodos , Ultrasonografía/economía , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Cirrosis Hepática/economía , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Masculino , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/economía , Detección Precoz del Cáncer/métodos , Años de Vida Ajustados por Calidad de Vida , Estados Unidos , Análisis de Costo-EfectividadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) is the sixth most common cancer and the third-leading cause of cancer-related mortality in the world. AREAS COVERED: This review will discuss risk factors, demographic differences, global trends, and the economic burden of HCC. Viral hepatitis, particularly hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection, is the most common underlying liver disease leading to HCC in those with cirrhosis. Other important risk factors include alcoholic liver disease, nonalcoholic fatty liver disease, metabolic syndrome, etc. With the introduction of direct-acting antiviral agents for hepatitis C virus infection, routine vaccination against HBV, and increasing support for robust public screening programs, the incidence rates for HCC due to viral hepatitis is falling in many countries. Meanwhile, the prevalence of obesity and metabolic syndrome are on the rise, as is NAFLD-related HCC incidence. Asia and Africa have the highest incidence rates of HCC. In multiethnic countries, racial and ethnic minorities experience disparities in HCC incidence as well as mortality, representing an essential area for improvement in terms of healthcare inequity. EXPERT OPINION: Interventions to minimize the global burden of HCC aim to reduce rates of the most common risk factors and implement effective treatment of underlying etiology and comprehensive screening programs for HCC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiología , Salud Global , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Demografía , Humanos , Incidencia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Tamizaje Masivo , Prevalencia , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with metastatic hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) suffer symptoms of both end-stage liver disease and cancer. Palliative care (PC) enhances the quality of life via symptom control and even improves survival for some cancers. Our study characterized rates of PC utilization among metastatic HCC patients and determined factors associated with PC receipt. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective review of adult National Cancer Database patients diagnosed with metastatic HCC between 2004 and 2016. Chi-square tests were used to analyze two cohorts: those who received PC and those who did not. Logistic regression was performed to assess the impact of clinicodemographic factors on the likelihood of receiving PC. RESULTS: PC utilization was low at just 17%. Later year of diagnosis, insured status, and higher education level were associated with an increased likelihood of receiving PC. Treatment at academic centers or integrated network cancer programs increased the likelihood of receiving PC compared to treatment at a community center (odds ratio [OR] = 1.17, 95% confidence interval [CI] = 1.03-1.33 and OR = 1.25, 95% CI = 1.07-1.45; respectively). Hispanics were significantly less likely to received PC than non-Hispanic Whites (OR = 0.73, 95% CI = 0.64-0.82). CONCLUSIONS: PC utilization among patients with metastatic HCC remains low. Targeted efforts should be enacted to increase the delivery of PC in this group.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Cuidados Paliativos , Calidad de Vida , Factores Socioeconómicos , Anciano , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/secundario , Terapia Combinada , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de SupervivenciaAsunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/legislación & jurisprudencia , Hepatitis B/diagnóstico , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Antivirales/administración & dosificación , Antivirales/economía , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Australia/epidemiología , Costo de Enfermedad , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Fibrosis/economía , Fibrosis/epidemiología , Fibrosis/prevención & control , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Hepatitis B/epidemiología , Hepatitis B/prevención & control , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/administración & dosificación , Vacunas contra Hepatitis B/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/prevención & control , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Tamizaje Masivo/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: High-quality estimates of health care costs are required to understand the burden of illness and to inform economic models. We estimated the costs associated with hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection from the public payer perspective in Ontario, Canada. METHODS: In this population-based retrospective cohort study, we identified patients aged 18-105 years diagnosed with chronic HCV infection in Ontario from 2003 to 2014 using linked administrative data. We allocated the time from diagnosis until death or the end of follow-up (Dec. 31, 2016) to 9 mutually exclusive health states using validated algorithms: no cirrhosis, no cirrhosis (RNA negative) (i.e., cured HCV infection), compensated cirrhosis, decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma, both decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, liver transplantation, terminal (liver-related) and terminal (non-liver-related). We estimated direct medical costs (in 2018 Canadian dollars) per 30 days per health state and used regression models to identify predictors of the costs. RESULTS: We identified 48 239 patients with chronic hepatitis C, of whom 30 763 (63.8%) were men and 35 891 (74.4%) were aged 30-59 years at diagnosis. The mean 30-day costs were $798 (95% confidence interval [CI] $780-$816) (n = 43 568) for no cirrhosis, $661 (95% CI $630-$692) (n = 6422) for no cirrhosis (RNA negative), $1487 (95% CI $1375-$1599) (n = 4970) for compensated cirrhosis, $3659 (95% CI $3279-$4039) (n = 3151) for decompensated cirrhosis, $4238 (95% CI $3480-$4996) (n = 550) for hepatocellular carcinoma, $8753 (95% CI $7130-$10 377) (n = 485) for both decompensated cirrhosis and hepatocellular carcinoma, $4539 (95% CI $3746-$5333) (n = 372) for liver transplantation, $11 202 (95% CI $10 645-$11 760) (n = 3201) for terminal (liver-related) and $8801 (95% CI $8331-$9271) (n = 5278) for terminal (non-liver-related) health states. Comorbidity was the most significant predictor of total costs for all health states. INTERPRETATION: Our findings suggest that the financial burden of HCV infection is substantially higher than previously estimated in Canada. Our comprehensive, up-to-date cost estimates for clinically defined health states of HCV infection should be useful for future economic evaluations related to this disorder.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Costos de la Atención en Salud , Hepatitis C Crónica/economía , Cirrosis Hepática/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antivirales/economía , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/etiología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Estudios de Cohortes , Femenino , Hepatitis C Crónica/complicaciones , Hepatitis C Crónica/terapia , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/etiología , Cirrosis Hepática/terapia , Neoplasias Hepáticas/etiología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Trasplante de Hígado/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To investigate the value of European deprivation index (EDI) and hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) characteristics and their relationships with outcome after liver transplantation (LT). METHODS: Patients undergoing LT for HCC were included from a national database (from "Agence de la Biomédecine" between 2006 and 2016. Characteristics of the patients were blindly extracted from the database. Thus, EDI was calculated in 5 quintiles and prognosis factors of survival were determined according to a Cox model. RESULTS: Among the 3865 included patients, 33.9% were in the fifth quintile (quintile 1, N = 562 [14.5%]; quintile 2, N = 647 [16.7%]; quintile 3, N = 654 [16.9%]; quintile 4, N = 688 [17.8%]). Patients in each quintile were comparable regarding HCC history, especially median size of HCC, number of nodules of HCC and alpha-fetoprotein score. In the univariate analysis of the crude survival, having >2 nodules of HCC before LT and time on waiting list were associated with a higher risk of death (P < 0.0001 and P = 0.03, respectively). EDI, size of HCC, model for end-stage liver disease score, Child-Pugh score were not statistically significant in the crude and net survival. In both survival, time on waiting list and number of HCC ≥2 were independent factor of mortality after LT for HCC (P = 0.009 and 0.001, respectively, and P = 0.03 and 0.02, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: EDI does not impact overall survival after LT for HCC. Number of HCC and time on waiting list are independent prognostic factors of survival after LT for HCC.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Trasplante de Hígado , Clase Social , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/diagnóstico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Francia/epidemiología , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Trasplante de Hígado/efectos adversos , Trasplante de Hígado/economía , Trasplante de Hígado/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Tiempo de Tratamiento , Resultado del Tratamiento , Listas de Espera , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: As an emerging technology, robot-assisted surgical system has some potential merits in many complicated endoscopic procedures compared with laparoscopic surgery. But robot-assisted liver resection is still a controversial problem on its advantages compared with laparoscopic liver resection. We aimed to perform the meta-analysis to assess and compare the clinical outcomes of robot-assisted and laparoscopic liver resection. METHODS: We searched PubMed, Cochrane Library, Embase databases, Clinicaltrials, and Opengrey through March 24, 2020, including references of qualifying articles. English-language, original investigations in humans about robot-assisted and laparoscopic hepatectomy were included. Titles, abstracts, and articles were reviewed by at least 2 independent readers. Continuous and dichotomous variables were compared by the weighted mean difference (WMD) and odds ratio (OR), respectively. RESULTS: Of 936 titles identified in our original search, 28 articles met our criteria, involving 3544 patients. Compared with laparoscopy, the robot-assisted groups had longer operative time (WMD: 36.93; 95% CI, 19.74-54.12; P < 0.001), lower conversion rate (OR: 0.63; 95% CI, 0.46-0.87; P = 0.005), higher transfusion rate (WMD: 2.39; 95% CI, 1.51-3.76; P < 0.001) and higher total cost (WMD:0.49; 95% CI, 0.42-0.55; P < 0.001). In addition, the baseline characteristics of patients about largest tumor size was larger (WMD: 0.36; 95% CI, 0.16-0.56; P < 0.001) and malignant lesions rate was higher (WMD: 1.50; 95% CI, 1.21-1.86; P < 0.001) in the robot-assisted versus laparoscopic hepatectomy. The subgroup analysis of minor hepatectomy showed robot-assisted was associated with longer operative time (WMD: 36.00; 95% CI, 12.59-59.41; P = 0.003), longer length of stay (WMD: 0.51; 95% CI, 0.02-1.01; p = 0.04) and higher total cost (WMD: 0.48; 95% CI, 0.25-0.72; P < 0.001) (Table 3); while the subgroup analysis of major hepatectomy showed robot-assisted was associated with lower estimated blood loss (WMD: -122.43; 95% CI, -151.78--93.08; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our meta-analysis revealed that robot-assisted was associated with longer operative time, lower conversion rate, higher transfusion rate and total cost, and robot-assisted has certain advantages in major hepatectomy compared with laparoscopic hepatectomy.
Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía/efectos adversos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Conversión a Cirugía Abierta/estadística & datos numéricos , Hepatectomía/economía , Hepatectomía/métodos , Hepatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Laparoscopía/economía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/economía , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Race, gender, insurance status, and income play important roles in predicting health care outcomes. However, the impact of these factors has yet to be fully elucidated in the setting of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: We designed a retrospective cohort study utilizing data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program to identify patients diagnosed with resectable HCC (N = 28,518). Demographic factors of interest included race (Asian/Pacific Islander [API], African American [AA], Native American/Alaska Native [NA], or White [WH]) and gender (male [M] or female [F]). Insurance classifications included those having Medicare/Private Insurance [ME/PI], Medicaid [MAID], or No Insurance [NI]. Median household income was estimated for all diagnosed with HCC. Endpoints included: (1) overall survival; (2) likelihood of receiving a recommendation for surgery; and (3) specific surgical intervention performed. Multivariate multinomial logistic regression for relative risk ratio (RRR) and Cox regression models were used to identify pertinent associations. RESULTS: Race, gender, insurance status, and income had statistically significant effects on the likelihood of surgical recommendation and overall survival. API were more likely to receive a recommendation for hepatic resection (RRR = 1.45; 95% CI: 1.31-1.61; Reference Race: AA) and exhibited prolonged overall survival (HR = 0.77; 95% CI: 0.73-0.82; Reference Race: AA) as compared to members of any other ethnic group; there was no difference in these endpoints between AA, NA, or WH individuals. Gender also had a significant effect on survival: Females exhibited superior overall survival (HR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.85-0.93; Reference Gender: M) as compared to males. Patients who had ME/PI were more likely than those with MAID or NI to receive a surgical recommendation. ME/PI was also associated with superior overall survival. Conclusions: Race, gender, insurance status, and income have measurable effects on HCC management and outcomes. The underlying causes of these disparities warrant further investigation.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Hepatectomía/mortalidad , Seguro de Salud , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Factores Socioeconómicos , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/cirugía , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Hepatectomía/economía , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Programa de VERF , Tasa de Supervivencia , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIMS: This study assessed the real-world United States (US) treatment patterns and the associated economic burden in patients diagnosed with advanced hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). METHODS: The MarketScan database was used to identify patients newly diagnosed with HCC who received systemic therapy between 2011 and 2018 and continuously enrolled for ≥6 months (baseline period) prior and ≥1 month following HCC diagnosis. Treatment patterns (systemic and locoregional therapy), healthcare resource utilization, and costs were reported during follow-up. RESULTS: The final sample included 1580 patients (median age, 61; 78% male; median follow up, 8.7 months). The most common first line of therapy (LOT) was sorafenib (78%). The median time from HCC diagnosis to start of sorafenib was 43 days, and the median duration of sorafenib therapy was 60 days. Only 17% of patients received second LOT, and non-sorafenib treatment use increased to 66% (mostly chemotherapy combination). Transarterial chemoembolization was the most commonly observed locoregional therapy prior to the first LOT. The multivariable-adjusted average all-cause total cost among sorafenib treated patients was $17,642 (95% CI: $16,711-$18,558) per-patient per-month), of which $11,393 were HCC-specific. CONCLUSIONS: In patients who received first-line therapy for HCC, the duration of therapy was short (potentially due to progression or tolerability). Most patients did not continue to second-line therapy. Despite the short duration of therapy, HCC patients still incur a high economic burden, and there is a need for more effective and tolerable treatments.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/terapia , Costos de la Atención en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/terapia , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Antineoplásicos/economía , Antineoplásicos/uso terapéutico , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Quimioembolización Terapéutica/economía , Costos y Análisis de Costo , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Embarazo , Sorafenib/economía , Sorafenib/uso terapéutico , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Racial/ethnic and socioeconomic disparities are assumed to negatively affect treatment and outcomes for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Our aim was to investigate the interaction of racial/ethnic and socioeconomic factors with stage of disease and type of treatment facility in receipt of treatment and overall survival (OS) of patients with HCC. METHODS: All patients with primary HCC in the US Safety-Net Collaborative database (2012-2014) were included. Patients were categorized into "safety-net" or "tertiary referral center" based on where they received treatment. Socioeconomic factors were determined at the zip-code level and included median income and percent of adults who graduated from high-school. Primary outcomes were receipt of treatment and OS. RESULTS: On MV Cox regression, neither race/ethnicity, median income, nor care provided at a SNH were associated with decreased OS (all p > 0.05). Independent predictors of decreased OS included lack of insurance (HR 1.34), less educational attainment (HR 1.59) higher MELD score (HR 1.07), higher stage at diagnosis (II:HR 1.34, III:HR 2.87, IV:HR 3.23), and not receiving treatment (HR 3.94) (all p < 0.05). Factors associated with not receiving treatment included history of alcohol abuse (OR 0.682), increasing MELD (OR 0.874), higher stage at diagnosis (III: OR 0.234, IV: OR 0.210) and care at a safety net facility (OR 0.424) There were no racial/ethnic or socioeconomic disparities in receipt of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: There is no intrinsic or direct association of race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, or being treated at select safety-net hospitals with worse outcomes. Poor liver function, no insurance, and advanced stage of presentation are the main determinants of not receiving treatment and decreased survival.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Hepatocelular/epidemiología , Etnicidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Disparidades en Atención de Salud , Neoplasias Hepáticas/epidemiología , Grupos Raciales/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores Socioeconómicos , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/economía , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Laparoscopic hemihepatectomy (LHH) may offer advantages over open hemihepatectomy (OHH) in blood loss, recovery, and hospital stay. The aim of this study is to evaluate our recent experience performing hemihepatectomy and compare complications and costs up to 90 days following laparoscopic versus open procedures. Retrospective evaluation of patients undergoing hemihepatectomy at our center 01/2010-12/2018 was performed. Patient, tumor, and surgical characteristics; 90-day complications; and costs were analyzed. Inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) was used to balance covariates. A total of 141 hemihepatectomies were included: 96 OHH and 45 LHH. While operative times were longer for LHH, blood loss and transfusions were less. At 90 days, there were similar rates of liver-specific and surgical complications but fewer medical complications following LHH. Medical complications that arose with greater frequency following OHH were primarily pulmonary complications and urinary and central venous catheter infections. Complications at 90 days were lower following LHH (Clavien-Dindo grade ≥ III OHH 23%, LHH 11%, p = 0.130; Comprehensive Complication Index OHH 20.0 ± 16.1, LHH 10.9 ± 14.2, p = 0.001). While operating costs were higher, costs for hospital stay and readmissions were lower with LHH. Patients undergoing LHH experience a significant reduction in postoperative medical complications and costs, resulting in 90-day cost equity compared with OHH.
Asunto(s)
Costos y Análisis de Costo , Hepatectomía/economía , Hepatectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/economía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Neoplasias Hepáticas/economía , Neoplasias Hepáticas/cirugía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Puntaje de Propensión , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/economía , Enfermedades Respiratorias/economía , Enfermedades Respiratorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Safety net hospitals have historically cared for a disproportionate number of patients of low socioeconomic status, racial and ethnic minorities, and patients with cancer. These innate challenges make safety net hospitals important in understanding how to improve access to cancer care in order to fit the needs of vulnerable patients and ultimately improve their outcomes. The purpose of this study is to characterize the current state and treatment of hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) at Ben Taub Hospital, a safety net hospital in Houston, Texas. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed to review the demographic characteristics, clinicopathologic data, treatment strategies, and outcomes of HCC patients at Ben Taub Hospital between January 2012 and December 2014. RESULTS: Two-hundred twenty-six men and 78 women with a mean age of 58 y underwent evaluation. Most (87%) were either uninsured or covered by Medicaid. The majority (69%) of patients presented with advanced (stage 2 or more) disease, with 58% of patients presenting with multiple lesions. Of the 40% that presented with a solitary lesion, the average size was 4.97 cm. Transarterial chemoembolization was used in 37% of patients and sorafenib was given to 26% of patients. Five patients underwent successful transplant. One hundred seventeen (38%) patients died of their disease, 25 patients are alive with no evidence of disease, and 159 patients have been lost to follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: Most patients with HCC presented to this safety net hospital with advanced disease; however, multiple local and systemic treatments were offered. Screening programs to detect HCC at an earlier stage are essential for successful long-term outcomes in a resource-strapped hospital with limited access to liver transplantation.