Construction and Validation of a Nomogram Predicting the Overall Survival Benefit of Unilateral Breast Cancer Patients Undergoing Contralateral Prophylactic Mastectomy.

BACKGROUND: Currently, research on the prognostic factors of unilateral breast cancer (UBC) patients receiving contralateral prophylactic mastectomy (CPM) is limited. This study aimed to construct a new nomogram to predict these patients' overall survival (OS). METHODS: In this retrospective study, 88,477 patients who underwent CPM or unilateral mastectomy (UM) were selected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results database. Kaplan-Meier curves and Cox regression analyses were used to determine the difference in the impact of the 2 surgical methods on the prognosis. Multivariate Cox analysis was used to determine the best prognostic variable and construct a nomogram. The concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve, calibration curve, decision curve analysis (DCA), net reclassification improvement (NRI), and integrated discrimination improvement (IDI) were used to evaluate the discrimination capability and clinical effectiveness of the nomogram. RESULTS: The prognosis of patients receiving CPM and UM was significantly different. The DCA curves indicated that the nomogram could provide more excellent clinical net benefits for these patients. The NRI and IDI of the nomogram demonstrated that its performance was better than that of the classical tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) staging system. CONCLUSION: This study developed and validated a practical nomogram to predict the OS of UBC patients undergoing CPM, which provided a beneficial tool for clinical decision-making management.

[Reducing the risk of radiation-induced cardiotoxicity in patients with left breast tumor]. / A sugárkezelés okozta cardiotoxicitas kockázatának csökkentése bal oldali emlotumoros betegek kezelése során.

INTRODUCTION: Breast cancer is one of the most common malignancies affecting women. Treatment with drugs and radiotherapy increases the incidence of late cardiovascular disease. It is therefore particularly important to protect the heart from radiation exposure. METHOD: We prepared an irradiation plan for 45 patients with left breast cancer using deep breathing and normal breathing techniques. The plans were compared and analyzed. The irradiation plans were created in the Philips Pinnacle v. 16 planning system. RESULTS: At the same target volume coverage, the use of the deep breathing technique leads to a reduction of the dose burden to the heart and to the left descending coronary branch, thus reducing the incidence of late cardiovascular complications. DISCUSSION: The results obtained show that the use of the deep breathing technique during adjuvant radiotherapy of left-sided breast cancer patients has a beneficial effect on the radiation exposure of the heart. Our results are in good agreement with similar data from national centres. We were not only able to maintain planning target volume coverage, but also to achieve an improvement of 1%. There is a significant difference in dose to the heart and coronary artery. By using the deep breathing technique, we were able to reduce the average cardiac dose by almost half (deep breathing: 2.87 Gy, normal breathing: 5.4 Gy). The coronary exposure was reduced from 19.5 Gy to 10.98 Gy. CONCLUSION: The accuracy of treatment can be further improved by using a respiratory gating system with a surface-guided radiotherapy system. The successful use of deep breathing technique requires professionalism of the treatment staff and good patient cooperation. It is less equipment intensive than a respiration-guided system. The deep breathing technique is no longer considered state-of-the-art in the era of breath-holding, but the experience gained in our department is worth describing because of its relevance to oncocardiology. Orv Hetil. 2023; 164(11): 420-425.

Midterm follow-up results of a novel technique: Contralateral breast overlapped reconstruction after mastectomy for unilateral breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: The breasts of Oriental women are characterized by an obvious scar constitution and a relatively small mammary gland volume. Thus, plastic surgery, which is now popular in the West, is not suitable for most patients in China, and Chinese surgeons are searching for symmetrical plastic surgery options that are suitable for patients with breast tumors, unilateral breast implants and an obvious scar constitution. METHODS: Between January 2016 and December 2019, 15 patients underwent contralateral breast overlapped reconstruction (COBOR) at the Affiliated Hospital of Putian University. We assessed their clinicopathological data, complications, cosmetic satisfaction and quality of life. RESULTS: The mean age was 41.6 years (range, 31-54 years), the average BMI was 24.36 kg/m2 (range, 20.3-28.4 kg/m2), the most common tumor location was the upper outer quadrant (n = 9), the mean preoperative tumor size was 21.11 mm (range, 7-42 mm), and 4 patients underwent neoadjuvant chemotherapy. The cancer grades and histological types were as follows: G3 nonspecial type (NST), 3 cases; G2 NST, 6 cases; G2 lobular carcinoma, 1 case; and ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS), 5 cases. The nipple margin was negative in all of these cases. Among them, there was 1 case of poor wound healing caused by subcutaneous fat liquefaction around the incision. In another case, partial nipple necrosis occurred on the affected side due to an insufficient nipple blood supply after the operation and healed after debridement and dressing changes. There were no cases of tumor recurrence during the mean follow-up of 22.53 months (range, 11-47 months). The BREAST-Q scores showed that COBOR provided good patient satisfaction. CONCLUSION: For Oriental patients with small breasts, COBOR, which results in fewer scars, good symmetry and good satisfaction, is an effective and safe surgical method. However, larger studies with longer follow-up periods are needed to obtain more reliable postoperative results.

Left sided breast cancer is associated with aggressive biology and worse outcomes than right sided breast cancer.

Breast cancer is more common on the left side than the right side. We aim to evaluate differences in clinicopathological and genomic characteristics based on laterality. We analyzed survival outcomes and clinical characteristics of 881,320 patients recorded by the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) program. The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) was used to explore genomic and clinical features from 1,062 patients. Gene expression data was used to quantitate cytolytic activity and hallmark gene-sets were used for gene set enrichment analysis. An institutional retrospective review was conducted on 155 patients treated with neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT). Patient characteristics were summarized by pathological complete response (pCR). Left sided tumors were found to be more prevalent than right sided tumors. No major clinicopathological differences were noted by laterality. Left sided breast cancer demonstrated poorer outcomes versus right sided tumors (HR 1.05, 95% CI 1.01-1.08; p = 0.011). Cell proliferation gene sets, including E2F Targets, G2M Checkpoint, Mitotic spindle, and MYC Targets, were enriched on the left side compared to the right. Left sided tumors had lower pCR rates versus right sided tumors (15.4% versus 29.9%, p = 0.036). Our findings suggest that left sided breast cancer is associated with aggressive biology and worse outcomes compared to right sided breast cancer.

When left does not seem right: epigenetic and bioelectric differences between left- and right-sided breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: During embryogenesis lateral symmetry is broken, giving rise to Left/Right (L/R) breast tissues with distinct identity. L/R-sided breast tumors exhibit consistently-biased incidence, gene expression, and DNA methylation. We postulate that a differential L/R tumor-microenvironment crosstalk generates different tumorigenesis mechanisms. METHODS: We performed in-silico analyses on breast tumors of public datasets, developed xenografted tumors, and conditioned MDA-MB-231 cells with L/R mammary extracts. RESULTS: We found L/R differential DNA methylation involved in embryogenic and neuron-like functions. Focusing on ion-channels, we discovered significant L/R epigenetic and bioelectric differences. Specifically, L-sided cells presented increased methylation of hyperpolarizing ion channel genes and increased Ca2+ concentration and depolarized membrane potential, compared to R-ones. Functional consequences were associated with increased proliferation in left tumors, assessed by KI67 expression and mitotic count. CONCLUSIONS: Our findings reveal considerable L/R asymmetry in cancer processes, and suggest specific L/R epigenetic and bioelectric differences as future targets for cancer therapeutic approaches in the breast and many other paired organs.

Reproducibility of repeated breathhold and impact of breathhold failure in whole breast and regional nodal irradiation in prone crawl position.

In whole breast and regional nodal irradiation (WB + RNI), breathhold increases organ at risk (OAR) sparing. WB + RNI is usually performed in supine position, because positioning materials obstruct beam paths in prone position. Recent advancements allow prone WB + RNI (pWB + RNI) with increased sparing of OARs compared to supine WB + RNI. We evaluate positional and dosimetrical impact of repeated breathhold (RBH) and failure to breathhold (FTBH) in pWB + RNI. Twenty left-sided breast cancer patients were scanned twice in breathhold (baseline and RBH) and once free breathing (i.e. FTBH). Positional impact was evaluated using overlap index (OI) and Dice similarity coefficient (DSC). Dosimetrical impact was assessed by beam transposition from the baseline plan. Mean OI and DSC ranges were 0.01-0.98 and 0.01-0.92 for FTBH, and 0.73-1 and 0.69-1 for RBH. Dosimetric impact of RBH was negligible. FTBH significantly decreased minimal dose to CTV WBI, level II and the internal mammary nodes, with adequate mean doses. FTBH significantly increased heart, LAD, left lung and esophagus dose. OI and DSC for RBH and FTBH show reproducible large ROI positions. Small ROIs show poor overlap. FTBH maintained adequate target coverage but increased heart, LAD, ipsilateral lung and esophagus dose. RBH is a robust technique in pWB + RNI. (Clinicaltrials.gov: NCT05179161, registered 05/01/2022).

Ipsilateral microcalcifications after breast-conserving surgery: is it possible to differentiate benign from malignant calcifications?

AIM: To analyse stereotactic biopsies of microcalcifications in patients with previous ipsilateral breast-conserving surgery (BCS) to identify the positivity rate, assess for an association between the patient's primary cancer or mammographic appearances of the microcalcifications, and the risk of recurrence. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Relevant patients from 2018-2020 were identified via a retrospective review of the prospectively maintained radiological procedure database. Clinicopathological features of the patients' primary tumour and new calcifications were obtained from the hospital electronic patient record system and the national integrated medical imaging system. RESULTS: Thirty-one percent of recurrences post-ipsilateral BCS presented as isolated microcalcifications on mammography. Fifty-three percent of patients undergoing stereotactic biopsy of ipsilateral calcifications had recurrence. A positive margin status was associated with new or recurrent malignancy. There was no significant correlation between oestrogen-receptor status, sentinel lymph node status, adjuvant radiotherapy or chemotherapy and the risk of recurrence. Calcifications within the tumour bed were more likely to be benign while calcifications within the same quadrant but remote from the tumour bed were more likely malignant. All coarse calcifications were benign while 67% of fine linear/fine linear branching and 89% of fine pleomorphic calcifications were malignant. CONCLUSION: Increased time since diagnosis, positive margin status, fine pleomorphic and fine linear calcifications in the same quadrant as the tumour bed were associated with malignancy. Patients with coarse calcifications and calcifications within the tumour bed may avoid stereotactic biopsy and undergo short-interval surveillance.

Tangential Volumetric Modulated Arc Therapy for Locally Advanced Breast Cancer.

Cardiovascular toxicity from breast radiation therapy (RT) is a concern to patients and providers. Herein, we present a cardiac-sparing strategy using tangential volumetric modulated arc therapy (tVMAT) in comparison with standard 3-dimensional conformal RT. Ten patients with left-sided breast cancer previously treated with adjuvant RT covering the breast, as well as the axillary and supraclavicular nodal regions, were selected for the study. For each patient, 2 plans were created: a dual-isocenter 3-field 3-dimensional conformal RT plan and a monoisocentric tVMAT plan. The prescription for both techniques was 50 Gy in 25 fractions to the breast and nodal target volumes. Compared with 3-dimensional conformal RT, tVMAT provided more uniform coverage to the breast and regional lymph nodes (mean conformity index: 1.42 for tVMAT vs 2.42 for 3-dimensional conformal RT; P < .01), and the maximum point dose for tVMAT was lower on average (112.8% for tVMAT vs 121.5% for 3-dimensional conformal RT; P < .001). Coverage to the lymph nodes was superior for tVMAT (average minimum coverage to 95% of entire nodal target volumes: 99.5% of prescribed dose for tVMAT vs 94.9% for 3-dimensional conformal RT; P < .001). Organ-at-risk sparing was improved with tVMAT, with a lower average V20Gy for the left lung (15.0% for tVMAT vs 24.6% for 3-dimensional conformal RT; P < .01) and lower mean heart dose (156 cGy for tVMAT vs 200 cGy for 3-dimensional conformal RT; P < .01). Tangential volumetric modulated arc therapy is a promising technique for the treatment of intact breast and regional lymphatics, and it may improve target coverage and organ-at-risk avoidance compared with 3-dimensional conformal techniques.

Solid papillary carcinoma of the breast

Solid Papillary Carcinoma (SPC) of the breast is a rare tumor with an incidence of less than 1%, mainly affecting elderly females. It is morphologically characterized by well-defined nodules with low-grade nuclear features associated with fibrovascular cores and shows neuroendocrine differentiation. SPC can be in-situ or invasive but has a favorable prognosis. It is a morphological mimicker of some pre-malignant conditions leading to its frequent misdiagnosis. An appropriate immunohistochemical (IHC) panel workup helps in distinguishing this tumor from its various morphological mimics. In this report, we present one such case of SPC with a small focus of invasion, reviewing the literature.

Hypofractionated radiotherapy in ten fractions for postmastectomy patients: a phase II study compared with another hypofractionation schedule with sixteen fractions.

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this phase II study was to evaluate the feasibility of hypofractionated radiotherapy (HFRT) with a dose of 36.5 Gy in 10 fractions in postmastectomy patients. METHODS: From March 2014 to December 2015, 85 patients with locally advanced breast cancer were eligible to participate in this study with a schedule of 36.5 Gy in 10 fractions. Intensity-modulated radiation therapy (IMRT) was delivered to the chest wall with or without the supraclavicular region. The primary endpoint was radiation-related toxicities. The secondary endpoints were locoregional failure-free survival (LRFFS), disease-free survival (DFS) and overall survival (OS). And the outcomes were compared with our retrospective study of 72 patients with 42.5 Gy in 16 fractions. RESULTS: The median follow-up was 69.0 (range 66.5-71.5) months in the 36.5 Gy group and 93.0 (range 91.9-94.1) months in the 42.5 Gy group, respectively. Radiation-related toxicities were mainly grade 1, although a few patients had grade 2 plexopathy (1.2%) and acute skin toxicity (1.2%) in the 36.5 Gy group, and grade 2 acute skin toxicity (5.6%) and lymphedema (4.2%) in the 42.5 Gy group. There were no significant differences between the groups in acute and late toxicities. For all the patients, the 5-year LRFFS, DFS and OS were 97.7 and 100.0%, 93.1 and 90.3%, 98.8 and 97.2%, respectively, without significant differences between the groups. CONCLUSION: Postmastectomy HFRT with a schedule of 36.5 Gy in 10 fractions was feasible, with mild toxicities and excellent 5-year clinical outcome. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number: ChiCTR-ONRC-14004391 . Date of registration: 9/3/2014.

Cardiopulmonary-related patient-reported outcomes in a randomized clinical trial of radiation therapy for breast cancer.

BACKGROUND: Long-term prospective patient-reported outcomes (PRO) after breast cancer adjuvant radiotherapy is scarce. TomoBreast compared conventional radiotherapy (CR) with tomotherapy (TT), on the hypothesis that TT might reduce lung-heart toxicity. METHODS: Among 123 women consenting to participate, 64 were randomized to CR, 59 to TT. CR delivered 50 Gy in 25 fractions/5 weeks to breast/chest wall and regional nodes if node-positive, with a sequential boost (16 Gy/8 fractions/1.6 weeks) after lumpectomy. TT delivered 42 Gy/15 fractions/3 weeks to breast/chest wall and regional nodes if node-positive, 51 Gy simultaneous-integrated-boost in patients with lumpectomy. PRO were assessed using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire QLQ-C30. PRO scores were converted into a symptom-free scale, 100 indicating a fully symptom-free score, 0 indicating total loss of freedom from symptom. Changes of PRO over time were analyzed using the linear mixed-effect model. Survival analysis computed time to > 10% PRO-deterioration. A post-hoc cardiorespiratory outcome was defined as deterioration in any of dyspnea, fatigue, physical functioning, or pain. RESULTS: At 10.4 years median follow-up, patients returned on average 9 questionnaires/patient, providing a total of 1139 PRO records. Item completeness was 96.6%. Missingness did not differ between the randomization arms. The PRO at baseline were below the nominal 100% symptom-free score, notably the mean fatigue-free score was 64.8% vs. 69.6%, pain-free was 75.4% vs. 75.3%, and dyspnea-free was 84.8% vs. 88.5%, in the TT vs. CR arm, respectively, although the differences were not significant. By mixed-effect modeling on early ≤2 years assessment, all three scores deteriorated, significantly for fatigue, P ≤ 0.01, without effect of randomization arm. By modeling on late assessment beyond 2 years, TT versus CR was not significantly associated with changes of fatigue-free or pain-free scores but was associated with a significant 8.9% improvement of freedom from dyspnea, P = 0.035. By survival analysis of the time to PRO deterioration, TT improved 10-year survival free of cardiorespiratory deterioration from 66.9% with CR to 84.5% with TT, P = 0.029. CONCLUSION: Modern radiation therapy can significantly improve long-term PRO. TRIAL REGISTRATION: Trial registration number ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00459628 , April 12, 2007 prospectively.

Contrast enhanced ultrasound quantitative parameters for assessing neoadjuvant chemotherapy response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the role of contrast-enhanced ultrasound (CEUS) quantitative parameters in predicting neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) response in patients with locally advanced breast cancer (LABC). METHODS: 30 patients with histologically proven LABC scheduled for NACT were recruited. CEUS was performed using a contrast bolus of 4.8 ml and time intensity curves (TICs) were obtained by contrast dynamics software. CEUS quantitative parameters assessed were peak enhancement (PE), time-to-peak (TTP), area under the curve (AUC) and mean transit time (MTT). The parameters were documented on four consecutive instances: before NACT and 3 weeks after each of the three cycles. The gold-standard was pathological response using Miller Payne Score obtained pre NACT and post-surgery. RESULTS: A decrease in mean values of PE and an increase in mean values of TTP and MTT was observed with each cycle of NACT among responders. Post each cycle of NACT (compared with baseline pre-NACT), there was a statistically significant difference in % change of mean values of PE, TTP and MTT between good responders and poor responders (p-value < 0.05). The diagnostic accuracy of TTP post-third cycle was 87.2% (p = 0.03), and MTT post--second and third cycle was 76.7% (p = 0.004) and 86.7% (p = 0.006) respectively. CONCLUSION: In responders, a decrease in the tumor vascularity was reflected in the CEUS quantitative parameters as a reduction in PE, and a prolongation in TTP, MTT. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Prediction of NACT response by CEUS has the potential to serve as a diagnostic modality for modification of chemotherapy regimens during ongoing NACT among patients with LABC, thus affecting patient prognosis.

Long-term results of a randomized partial irradiation trial compared to whole breast irradiation in the early stage and low-risk breast cancer patients after conservative surgery.

PURPOSE: To report long-term results of a randomized trial comparing accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) to whole-breast irradiation (WBI) in terms of efficacy, toxicity, and cosmesis. METHODS AND MATERIALS: WBI group was treated with 3D conformal external irradiation, 2 Gy daily/fraction, 5 fractions/week, to a total dose of 50 Gy. APBI group was treated with 3D conformal external irradiation 3.75 Gy/fraction, twice a day, 5 fractions/week, to a total dose of 37.5 Gy in the APBI group. Patients were followed up every 6 months up to 5 years and yearly thereafter. During follow-up visits, the clinician evaluated chronic toxicity and scored cosmetic results with a four-scale system. RESULTS: After a median follow-up of 10.3 years, 43 patients in each group (84%) are alive without disease. One patient died after disease progression in the APBI arm, and there was no death in the WBI arm. The rest of the patients died from another disease different than breast cancer, similarly between groups. There was greater fibrosis in the APBI group (9 patients grade 1 and one grade 2) compared to WBI (3 patients grade 1 and one grade 2); p = 0.18. Regarding cosmesis, in APBI group, 19 and 21 (43.2 and 47%) patients had excellent or good results, similar to the WBI group with 18 patients (40.9%) in each cosmesis outcome. The WBI group did not have any patient with poor cosmesis but the APBI had 3 (6.8%; p = 0.24). CONCLUSION: After a follow-up of 10 years, there were no differences in efficacy between the 2 treatment arms. Despite slight greater toxicity in the APBI group, the cosmesis was similar and satisfactory in both groups.

Multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy versus stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife for accelerated partial breast irradiation: a comparative treatment planning study with respect to dosimetry of organs at risk.

BACKGROUND: The aim of the study was to dosimetrically compare multicatheter interstitial brachytherapy (MIBT) and stereotactic radiotherapy with CyberKnife (CK) for accelerated partial breast irradiation (APBI) especially concerning the dose of organs at risk (OAR-s). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Treatment plans of thirty-two MIBT and CK patients were compared. The OAR-s included ipsilateral non-target and contralateral breast, ipsilateral and contralateral lung, skin, ribs, and heart for left-sided cases. The fractionation was identical (4 x 6.25 Gy) in both treatment groups. The relative volumes (e.g. V100, V90) receiving a given relative dose (100%, 90%), and the relative doses (e.g. D0.1cm3, D1cm3) delivered to the most exposed small volumes (0.1 cm3, 1 cm3) were calculated from dose-volume histograms. All dose values were related to the prescribed dose (25 Gy). RESULTS: Regarding non-target breast CK performed slightly better than MIBT (V100: 0.7% vs. 1.6%, V50: 10.5% vs. 12.9%). The mean dose of the ipsilateral lung was the same for both techniques (4.9%), but doses irradiated to volume of 1 cm3 were lower with MIBT (36.1% vs. 45.4%). Protection of skin and rib was better with MIBT. There were no significant differences between the dose-volume parameters of the heart, but with MIBT, slightly larger volumes were irradiated by 5% dose (V5: 29.9% vs. 21.2%). Contralateral breast and lung received a somewhat higher dose with MIBT (D1cm3: 2.6% vs. 1.8% and 3.6% vs. 2.5%). CONCLUSIONS: The target volume can be properly irradiated by both techniques with similar dose distributions and high dose conformity. Regarding the dose to the non-target breast, heart, and contralateral organs the CK was superior, but the nearby organs (skin, ribs, ipsilateral lung) received less dose with MIBT. The observed dosimetric differences were small but significant in a few parameters at the examined patient number. More studies are needed to explore whether these dosimetric findings have clinical significance.

Appropriate margin for planning target volume for breast radiotherapy during deep inspiration breath-hold by variance component analysis.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to quantify errors by using a cine electronic portal imaging device (cine EPID) during deep inspiration breath-hold (DIBH) for left-sided breast cancer and to estimate the planning target volume (PTV) by variance component analysis. METHODS: This study included 25 consecutive left-sided breast cancer patients treated with whole-breast irradiation (WBI) using DIBH. Breath-holding was performed while monitoring abdominal anterior-posterior (AP) motion using the Real-time Position Management (RPM) system. Cine EPID was used to evaluate the chest wall displacements in patients. Cine EPID images of the patients (309,609 frames) were analyzed to detect the edges of the chest wall using a Canny filter. The errors that occurred during DIBH included differences between the chest wall position detected by digitally reconstructed radiographs and that of all cine EPID images. The inter-patient, inter-fraction, and intra-fractional standard deviations (SDs) in the DIBH were calculated, and the PTV margin was estimated by variance component analysis. RESULTS: The median patient age was 55 (35-79) years, and the mean irradiation time was 20.4 ± 1.7 s. The abdominal AP motion was 1.36 ± 0.94 (0.14-5.28) mm. The overall mean of the errors was 0.30 mm (95% confidence interval: - 0.05-0.65). The inter-patient, inter-fraction, and intra-fractional SDs in the DIBH were 0.82 mm, 1.19 mm, and 1.63 mm, respectively, and the PTV margin was calculated as 3.59 mm. CONCLUSIONS: Errors during DIBH for breast radiotherapy were monitored using EPID images and appropriate PTV margins were estimated by variance component analysis.

Cardiac dose reduction using deep inspiratory breath hold (DIBH) in radiation treatment of left sided breast cancer patients with breast conservation surgery and modified radical mastectomy.

PURPOSE: Deep inspiration breath hold (DIBH) reduces heart and pulmonary doses during left-sided breast radiation therapy (RT); however, there is limited information whether the reduction in doses is similar in patients with modified radical MRM (MRM) and breast conservation surgery (BCS). The primary objective was to determine whether DIBH offers greater dosimetric reduction in cardiac doses in patients with MRM as compared to BCS with secondary objectives of documenting time consumed in counseling, simulation and planning such techniques. METHODS: Thirty patients with diagnosis of left sided breast cancer underwent CT simulation both free breathing (FB) and DIBH. Patients were grouped into two cohorts: MRM (n = 20) and BCS (n = 10). 3D-conformal plans were developed and FB was compared to DIBH for entire group (n = 30) and each cohort using Wilcoxon signed-rank tests for continuous variables and McNemar's test for discrete variables. The percent relative reduction conferred by DIBH in mean heart (Dmean heart) and left anterior descending artery dose (LADmean and LADmax), heart V25,V10, V2 and ipsilateral DmeanLung,V20, V12 were compared between the two cohorts using Wilcox rank-sum testing. A two-tailed p-value ≤ 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Time consumed during FB and DIBH from patient counseling to planning was documented. RESULTS: Patients undergoing BCS had comparable boost target coverage on DIBH and FB. For the overall group (n = 30), DIBH reduced Dmean heart and LAD dose, V25, V10 and V2 doses for the heart and Ipsilateral DmeanLung, V20, V12 which was statistically significant. For individual cohorts DIBH did not significantly reduce the lung (Ipsilateral DmeanLung, V20, V12) and LAD (LADmean and LADmax) doses for BCS while significant reduction in all cardiopulmonary doses was seen in MRM cohort. Despite significant reductions with DIBH in MRM, ipsilateral lung constraint of V12 < 15% was less commonly achieved in MRM (n = 11, 55%) requiring nodal radiation as compared to BCS (n = 3, 30%). Percent reduction in all cardiac and pulmonary dosimetric parameters with DIBH was similar in the MRM cohort as compared to BCS cohort. In total 73.1 ± 2.6 min was required for FB as compared to 108.1 ± 4.1 min in DIBH. CONCLUSION: DIBH led to significant reduction of cardiac doses in both MRM and BCS. Reduction of lung and LAD doses were significant in MRM cohort. All cardiac constraints were met with DIBH in both cohorts, lung constraints were less frequently met in MRM cohort requiring nodal radiation.

Validity of the prognostication tool PREDICT version 2.2 in Japanese breast cancer patients.

INTRODUCTION: PREDICT is a prognostication tool that calculates the potential benefit of various postsurgical treatments on the overall survival (OS) of patients with nonmetastatic invasive breast cancer. Once patient, tumor, and treatment details have been entered, the tool will show the estimated 5-, 10-, and 15-year OS outcomes, both with and without adjuvant therapies. This study aimed to conduct an external validation of the prognostication tool PREDICT version 2.2 by evaluating its predictive accuracy of the 5- and 10-year OS outcomes among female patients with nonmetastatic invasive breast cancer in Japan. METHODS: All female patients diagnosed from 2001 to 2013 with unilateral, nonmetastatic, invasive breast cancer and had undergone surgical treatment at Kyushu University Hospital, Fukuoka, Japan, were selected. Observed and predicted 5- and 10-year OS rates were analyzed for the validation population and the subgroups. Calibration and discriminatory accuracy were assessed using Chi-squared goodness-of-fit test and area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC). RESULTS: A total of 636 eligible cases were selected from 1, 213 records. Predicted and observed OS differed by 0.9% (p = 0.322) for 5-year OS, and 2.4% (p = 0.086) for 10-year OS. Discriminatory accuracy results for 5-year (AUC = 0.707) and 10-year (AUC = 0.707) OS were fairly well. CONCLUSION: PREDICT tool accurately estimated the 5- and 10-year OS in the overall Japanese study population. However, caution should be used for interpretation of the 5-year OS outcomes in patients that are ≥65 years old, and also for the 10-year OS outcomes in patients that are ≥65 years old, those with histologic grade 3 and Luminal A tumors, and in those considering ETx or no systemic treatment.

Dosimetric comparison of four high performance techniques for irradiation of breast cancer patients.

PURPOSE: The use of IMRT for the treatment of breast cancer has been growing considerably in our institution since 2009. Alternatively, helical tomotherapy (HT) using a field width of 2.5 and 5cm (HT_FW_5), volumetric-modulated arc therapy (VMAT), or proton therapy with pencil-beam scanning (PT-PBS) have also been used to reduce treatment duration or optimize organ-at-risk (OAR) sparing. The purpose of this study was to compare the 4 treatment modalities available at our site. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We studied 10 patients treated for breast cancer with lymph node involvement. The prescribed dose was 51.8Gy to the breast with a simultaneous integrated boost up to 63Gy, and 50.4Gy to lymph nodes in 28 fractions. The CTV was delineated according to ESTRO Guidelines. Dosimetric planning in routine clinical practice was performed using HT_FW_2.5. The approved clinical plan was compared to the 3 other plans. Dosimetric goals for PTV coverage were D95%≥95% and D2%≤107% of the prescribed dose. Mean and maximum doses to OAR were recorded. RESULTS: HT_FW_5 and VMAT plans ensure equivalent or even better PTV coverage compared to the initial clinically approved plan but at the cost of poorer OAR sparing. PT_PBS plans showed that an excellent PTV coverage can be maintained with significantly lower doses to OAR. CONCLUSION: HT_FW_5 and VMAT plans allow a significant reduction of treatment duration and can be a good alternative to HT_FW_2.5 for specific populations. HT_FW_2.5 could be chosen for patients at higher risk of side effects. In addition, PT_PBS should be considered in the near future as it has been shown to have a major potential benefit to lower the risk of side effects with the same level of PTV coverage.

Evaluation of breathing-adapted radiation therapy for right-sided early stage breast cancer patients.

BACKGROUND: Adverse effects of breast irradiation have been an important concern given the increased survival of early stage breast cancer (ESBC) patients with more effective treatments. However, there is paucity of data on the utility of Active Breathing Control (ABC) technique for right-sided ESBC patients. In this study, we assessed the incorporation of ABC into adjuvant Radiation Therapy (RT) of right-sided ESBC patients and report our dosimetric results. METHODS: Thirty-six patients receiving whole breast irradiation followed by a sequential tumor bed boost were included in the study. All patients received field-in-field intensity modulated radiation therapy with incorporation of active breathing control-moderate deep inspiration breath-hold (ABC-mDIBH) after breast conserving surgery. Dose-volume parameters in both plans with and without ABC-mDIBH were compared using Mann-Whitney U test. RESULTS: Mean lung dose decreased from 7 Gy to 5.2 Gy (26% reduction) for the total lung (p < 0.001) and from 12.6 to 9.4 Gy (25% reduction) for the ipsilateral lung (p < 0.001). Mean dose decreased from 4.6 Gy to 1.7 Gy (58% reduction) for liver (p < 0.001) and 1.7 Gy to 1.4 Gy (16% reduction) for the heart (p < 0.001). CONCLUSION: Our study revealed that incorporation of ABC-mDIBH into adjuvant RT of right-sided ESBC patients results in significantly improved critical organ sparing.