RESUMEN
The research retrospectively analyzed cases of spinal chordoma and chondrosarcoma involving patients who received treatment at the two hospitals between 2001 and 2023. Among the 48 patients studied (39 chordoma and 9 chondrosarcoma cases), the average age was 53.9 ± 15.8 years, with a range of 17 to 86 years. Out of these patients, 43 underwent excision surgery and were categorized based on tumor margin into negative (R0) or microscopically positive (R1) margin (n = 14) and macroscopically positive (R2) margin (n = 29) groups. The mean overall survival (OS) for R0/R1 and R2 groups was 156.5 ± 19.3 and 79.2 ± 11.9 months, respectively (p value = 0.012). The mean progression-free survival (PFS) for R0/R1 and R2 was 112.9 ± 24.4 and 25.5 ± 5.5 months (p value < 0.001). The study showed that regardless of whether patients in the R0/R1 or R2 groups received radiation therapy (RT) or not, there was no significant improvement in OS or PFS. Specifically, the OS and PFS for the RT only group were 75.9 ± 16.6 and 73.3 ± 18.0 months. In conclusion, the recommended treatment approach for spinal chordoma and chondrosarcoma remains en bloc resection surgery with an appropriate margin. Patients who are unsuitable for or decline surgery may find a beneficial disease control rate with traditional external beam photon/proton therapy.
Asunto(s)
Condrosarcoma , Cordoma , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Condrosarcoma/mortalidad , Condrosarcoma/patología , Condrosarcoma/cirugía , Condrosarcoma/radioterapia , Condrosarcoma/terapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Cordoma/radioterapia , Cordoma/patología , Cordoma/mortalidad , Cordoma/cirugía , Masculino , Anciano , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adolescente , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/patología , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto Joven , Bases de Datos Factuales , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) is a unique cancer treatment modality that enables precise targeting of tumors at the cellular level. Based on the success observed in nuclear reactors, BNCT now holds promise as a therapeutic approach for treating invasive brain tumors or head and neck cancers. Metastatic spinal tumors have been treated with multidisciplinary interventions such as surgical resection and radiation therapy. Despite recent advantages of radiation therapy, it remains challenging to achieve better quality of life and activity of daily living. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of BNCT in metastatic spinal tumor using a mouse model. METHODS: For the in vitro, neutron and photon irradiation was applied to A549 human lung adenocarcinoma cells. The cells were irradiated neutrons with or without p-boronophenylalanine (BPA) 10 µg Boron/mL for a 24-h exposure before neutron irradiation. The difference of biological effect between neutrons and photons was evaluated by colony forming assay. For in vivo, the tumor-bearing mice were intravenously administered BPA (250 mg/kg), followed by measuring biodistribution of boron using inductively coupled plasma atomic emission spectroscopy (ICP-AES). For in vivo BNCT, the mice were randomly assigned to untreated (n=10), neutron irradiation only (n=9), and BNCT groups (n=10). Overall survival and hindlimb function were analyzed. Histopathological examination was also performed to assess the influences of neutron irradiation. RESULTS: Neutron irradiation showed a stronger cell-killing effect than that exhibited by photon irradiation in vitro. For in vivo biodistribution, the highest boron accumulation in the tumor was seen at 2.5-h time point (10.5 µg B/g), with a tumor to normal spinal cord and blood ratios were 3.6 and 2.9, respectively. For the in vivo BNCT, BNCT had significantly prolonged survival (vs. untreated, P=0.002; vs. neutron only, P=0.01, respectively, log-rank test) and preserved mice hindlimb function compared to the other groups (vs. untreated, P<0.001; vs. neutron only, P=0.005, respectively, MANOVA). No adverse events and apparent histopathological changes were observed among three groups. CONCLUSIONS: These findings indicate that BNCT may represent a novel therapeutic option in the management of metastatic spinal tumors.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Captura de Neutrón de Boro , Terapia por Captura de Neutrón de Boro/métodos , Animales , Ratones , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Fenilalanina/análogos & derivados , Fenilalanina/farmacología , Línea Celular TumoralRESUMEN
Background and Objectives: The recently published Spine Stereotactic Radiosurgery (SSRS) ESTRO guidelines advise against treating spinal metastatic disease with a single dose equal to or smaller than 18 Gy, prioritizing local control over the potential for complications. This study aims to assess the necessity and validity of these higher dose recommendations by evaluating the outcomes and experiences with lower radiation doses. Materials and Methods: A retrospective evaluation of SSRS patients treated at a single institute was conducted. The outcomes and complications of this cohort were compared to the current literature and the data supporting the new ESTRO guidelines. Results: A total of 149 treatment sessions involving 242 spinal levels were evaluated. The overall local control rate was 91.2%. The mean radiation dose for the local control group compared to the local failure group was similar (17.5 vs. 17.6 Gy, not significant). The overall complication rate was 6%. These results are consistent with previous publications evaluating SSRS for metastatic spinal disease. Conclusions: SSRS dose escalation may increase local control efficacy but comes with a higher risk of complications. The evidence supporting the strong recommendations in the recent ESTRO guidelines is not robust enough to justify a universal application. Given the palliative nature of treatment for metastatic patients, dose determination should be individualized based on patient conditions and preferences, with a detailed discussion about the risk-benefit ratio of increased doses and the level of evidence supporting these recommendations.
Asunto(s)
Radiocirugia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
Chordomas are rare malignant neoplasms arising from vestigial remnants of the embryonic notochord. Approximately 55-70% of chordomas develop within the vertebral column. Their affinity to develop within the bones of the axial skeleton and propensity to locally invade and recur makes them challenging candidates for complete surgical excision. Adjuvant therapies are hence necessary to improve outcomes; for which chemotherapy has been observed to be largely ineffective, owing to the tumour being resistant to it. Radiotherapy is the current adjuvant therapy of choice for chordoma management. Over the years, proton beam therapy (PBT) has been the subject of medical attention, given the dosimetric benefits it confers over traditional radiotherapy, allowing more concentrated radiation to be given to the target of interest and reducing damage to surrounding normal tissue. A review of the current literature reveals PBT offers significantly better outcomes when used as an adjuvant to maximal surgical resection rather than as a definitive therapy.
Asunto(s)
Cordoma , Terapia de Protones , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Cordoma/radioterapia , Terapia de Protones/métodos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Due to its rarity, no standard treatment guidelines exist for pediatric spinal low-grade glioma (LGG-S). Proton therapy (PT) offers an attractive modality to minimize toxicity. Herein, we present the first published series of pediatric patients who received PT for progressive LGG-S. PROCEDURES: We identified eight consecutive patients with nonmetastatic LGG-S treated with PT. Cumulative incidence method was used to estimate local control (LC), freedom from distant metastases (FFDM), and freedom from progression (FFP). The Kaplan-Meier product limit method assessed overall survival (OS). Toxicity was assessed according to the Common Terminology Criteria for Adverse Events Version 5.0. RESULTS: Median age at diagnosis was 4 years. All patients underwent attempted resection and developed recurrence/progression prior to referral for PT, with median duration between initial surgery and PT of 4.4 years. Median age at the start of PT was 8 years. Most patients (n = 5) received PT as ≥third line treatment. Seven patients were treated with PT to the primary tumor. Most patients (n = 7) received between 45-50.4 CGE. Median follow up was 7.8 years. The 10-year estimates for LC, FFDM, FFP, and OS were 85, 88, 73, and 55%, respectively. One patient experienced malignant transformation and two developed pseudoprogression following PT. No pulmonary, gastrointestinal, or musculoskeletal toxicities were observed during or after PT. CONCLUSIONS: Despite negative selection bias our experience suggests PT for pediatric LGG-S offers long-term disease control with limited toxicity. The favorable therapeutic ratio of PT suggests it should be considered among first-line therapy in children with nonmetastatic, unresectable LGG-S.
Asunto(s)
Glioma , Terapia de Protones , Humanos , Terapia de Protones/métodos , Niño , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Glioma/radioterapia , Glioma/patología , Glioma/mortalidad , Estudios de Seguimiento , Adolescente , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Pronóstico , Lactante , Clasificación del Tumor , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/patología , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/patología , Neoplasias de la Médula Espinal/mortalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to retrospectively evaluate the efficacy of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for pain relief in patients with painful spinal bone metastases (SBMs) and to identify key factors contributing to treatment outcomes. METHODS: The authors conducted a retrospective analysis of adult patients who underwent SBRT for painful solid tumor SBMs between March 2012 and January 2023. During this period, SBRT was performed adhering to the International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium guidelines and international consensus recommendations for target volume delineation. To be included, patients needed to experience persistent pain directly associated with SBMs, warranting regular opioid treatment. Positive pain relief post-SBRT was defined by three criteria: 1) a decrease in the severity of pain; 2) reduction in opioid dosage; and 3) concurrent improvement in daily activities. The revised Tokuhashi score and Spine Instability Neoplastic Score were used to identify crucial factors influencing treatment outcomes. RESULTS: This study included 377 patients, covering 576 lesions across 759 vertebrae. Of these, 332 lesions showed significant pain relief within 3 months following SBRT. Lower pain relief rates were observed in patients with a revised Tokuhashi score of 0-8 or in patients with diabetes mellitus. In contrast, higher relief rates were linked to treating a single painful SBM in 1 SBRT course, and greater contouring of the involved sectors according to International Spine Radiosurgery Consortium guidelines and international consensus recommendations. The highest pain relief rate was observed in patients with prostate cancer (73.8%), whereas the lowest rate was observed in patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (36.4%). The presence of pre-SBRT vertebral fractures, the dosage and fraction of SBRT, and the use of concurrent systemic cancer therapies or antiresorptive agents, including bisphosphonates and denosumab, did not notably influence the pain relief efficacy of SBRT. Comprehensive medical records 6 months after SBRT treatment were available for only 362 lesions. The overall rate of pain relief observed was 32.6%. CONCLUSIONS: SBRT is an effective treatment approach for managing painful SBMs, achieving a pain relief rate of 57.6% within 3 months and maintaining a rate of 32.6% at 6 months after treatment. The transition to osteoblastic lesions may potentially improve the stability of SBMs, indicated by lower Spine Instability Neoplastic Score, which in turn could extend pain relief management.
Asunto(s)
Manejo del Dolor , Radiocirugia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/complicaciones , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Manejo del Dolor/métodos , Dolor en Cáncer/etiología , Dolor en Cáncer/radioterapia , Dimensión del DolorAsunto(s)
Plexo Braquial , Radiocirugia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Plexo Braquial/efectos de la radiación , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Fraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiaciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Implanted devices used in metastatic spine tumor surgery (MSTS) include pedicle screws, fixation plates, fixation rods, and interbody devices. A material to be used to fabricate any of these devices should possess an array of properties, which include biocompatibility, no toxicity, bioactivity, low wear rate, low to moderate incidence of artifacts during imaging, tensile strength and modulus that are comparable to those of cortical bone, high fatigue strength/long fatigue life, minimal or no negative impact on radiotherapy (RT) planning and delivery, and high capability for fusion to the contiguous bone. The shortcomings of Ti6Al4V alloy for these applications with respect to these desirable properties are well recognized, opening the field for an investigation about novel biomaterials that could replace the current gold standard. Previously published reviews on this topic have exhibited significant shortcomings in the studies they included, such as a small, heterogenous sample size and the lack of a cost-benefit analysis, extremely useful to understand the practical possibility of applying a novel material on a large scale. Therefore, this review aims to collect information about the clinical performance of these biomaterials from the most recent literature, with the objective of deliberating which could potentially be better than titanium in the future, with particular attention to safety, artifact production and radiotherapy planning interference. The significant promise showed by analyzing the clinical performance of these devices warrants further research through prospective studies with a larger sample size also taking into account each aspect of the production and use of such materials. METHODS: The Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) guidelines were used to improve the reporting of the review. The search was performed from March 2022 to September 2023. RESULTS: At the end of the screening process, 20 articles were considered eligible for this study. Polyetheretherketone (PEEK), Carbon-fibre reinforced polyetheretherketone (CFR-PEEK), long carbon fiber reinforced polymer (LCFRP), Polymethylmethacrylate (PMMA), and carbon screw and rods were used in the included studies. CONCLUSION: CFR-PEEK displays a noninferior safety and efficacy profile to titanium implanted devices. However, it also has other advantages. By decreasing artifact production, it is able to increase detection of local tumor recurrence and decrease radiotherapy dose perturbation, ultimately bettering prognosis for patients necessitating adjuvant treatment. Nonetheless, its drawbacks have not been explored fully and still require further investigation in future studies. This does not exclude the fact that CFR-PEEK could be a valid alternative to titanium in the near future.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Titanio , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Aleaciones , Materiales Biocompatibles , Polímeros , Resultado del Tratamiento , Cetonas , Benzofenonas , Fusión Vertebral/instrumentación , Fusión Vertebral/métodos , Tornillos PedicularesRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The Study Group for the Biology and Treatment of the OligoMetastatic Disease on behalf of the Italian Association of Radiotherapy and Clinical Oncology (AIRO) has conducted a national survey with the aim to depict the current patterns of practice of stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) for spinal oligometastases. METHODS: The Surveymonkey platform was used to send a 28-items questionnaire focused on demographic, clinical and technical aspects related to SBRT for spinal oligometastases. All the AIRO members were invited to fill the questionnaire. Data were then centralized to a single center for analysis and interpretation. RESULTS: 53 radiation oncologists from 47 centers fulfilled the survey. A complete agreement was observed in proposing SBRT for spinal oligometastases, with the majority considering up to 3 concurrent spine oligometastases feasible for SBRT (73.5%), regardless of spine site (70%), vertebral segment (85%) and morphological features of the lesion (71.7%). Regarding dose prescription, fractionated regimens resulted as the preferred option, either in 3 (58.4%) or five sessions (34%), with a substantial agreement in applying a PTV-margin larger than 1 mm (almost 90% of participants), and ideally using both MRI and PET imaging to improve target volume and organs-at-risk delineation (67.9%). CONCLUSIONS: This national italian survey illustrates the patterns of practice and the main issues for the indication of SBRT for spinal oligometastases. A substantial agreement in the numerical cut-off and vertebral segment involved for SBRT indication was reported, with a slight heterogeneity in terms of dose prescription and fractionation schemes.
Asunto(s)
Radiocirugia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Italia , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Oncología por Radiación , Sociedades MédicasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Proton beam therapy (PBT) plays an important role in the management of primary spine tumors. The purpose of this consensus statement was to summarize safe and optimal delivery of PBT for spinal tumors. METHODS AND MATERIALS: The Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Skull Base/Central nervous system/Sarcoma Subcommittee consisting of radiation oncologists and medical physicists with specific expertise in spinal irradiation developed expert recommendations discussing treatment planning considerations and current approaches in the treatment of primary spinal tumors. RESULTS: Computed tomography simulation: factors that require significant consideration include (1) patient comfort, (2) setup reproducibility and stability, and (3) accessibility of appropriate beam angles. SPINE STABILIZATION HARDWARE: If present, hardware should be placed with cross-links well above/below the level of the primary tumor to reduce the metal burden at the level of the tumor bed. New materials that can reduce uncertainties include polyether-ether-ketone and composite polyether-ether-ketone-carbon fiber implants. FIELD ARRANGEMENT: Appropriate beam selection is required to ensure robust target coverage and organ at risk sparing. Commonly, 2 to 4 treatment fields, typically from posterior and/or posterior-oblique directions, are used. TREATMENT PLANNING METHODOLOGY: Robust optimization is recommended for all pencil beam scanning plans (the preferred treatment modality) and should consider setup uncertainty (between 3 and 7 mm) and range uncertainty (3%-3.5%). In the presence of metal hardware, use of an increased range uncertainty up to 5% is recommended. CONCLUSIONS: The Particle Therapy Cooperative Group Skull Base/Central nervous system/Sarcoma Subcommittee has developed recommendations to enable centers to deliver PBT safely and effectively for the management of primary spinal tumors.
Asunto(s)
Consenso , Órganos en Riesgo , Terapia de Protones , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Terapia de Protones/métodos , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/diagnóstico por imagen , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X , Reproducibilidad de los ResultadosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: For patients with metastatic cancer, a key aspect of interdisciplinary care has involved the overall prognosis provided by Medical Oncology. This study represents prospective evaluation of Medical Oncology prognosis accuracy for patients considered for enrollment onto an ongoing randomized controlled trial. METHODS: The Spine Patient Optimal Radiosurgery Treatment for Symptomatic Metastatic Neoplasms (SPORTSMEN) phase 2 randomized clinical trial examines optimal radiation therapy treatment of symptomatic spinal metastases with a primary end point of pain freedom at 3 months post-treatment. A key eligibility criterion for trial enrollment is overall prognosis exceeding 3 months, typically provided by Medical Oncology. During the first year of trial enrollment, Medical Oncology prognosis for patients considered for SPORTSMEN inclusion was prospectively assessed for accuracy. RESULTS: Twenty-seven patients with documented Medical Oncology prognosis were considered for SPORTSMEN enrollment. The prognosis administered by Medical Oncology exceeded 3 months in 26 patients, and <3 months in 1 patient. The overall accuracy of Medical Oncology prognosis was correct for 15 of 27 patients (56%), significantly worse for inpatients than outpatients ( P =0.0381). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with metastatic spine disease, the estimated prognosis provided by Medical Oncology is often optimistic, as nearly half of patients assigned a prognosis of >3 months failed to reach this threshold before experiencing death or hospice. These findings indicate that a more heuristic approach to assessing patient prognosis may be necessary to avoid unwarranted prognostic optimism, particularly for inpatients. Such an approach could potentially provide a more compassionate and cost-effective management of these patients' remaining lifespan thereby optimizing quality of life.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Pronóstico , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/terapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Anciano , Radiocirugia/métodos , Adulto , Oncología Médica , Selección de PacienteRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to identify factors associated with local recurrence after spinal stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT), focusing on patient movement during treatment and tumor characteristics. METHODS: A total of 48 patients who underwent spinal SBRT alone without surgery from August 2017 to October 2022 were evaluated. Logistic regression analysis was conducted to identify factors associated with local recurrence, including patient movement and tumor characteristics such as soft tissue involvement and tumor volume. Patient movement during treatment was measured using cone beam computed tomography before and after irradiation. RESULTS: Among the included cases, 68.7% and 42.6% had soft tissue involvement and movement exceeding 1 mm, respectively. The median follow-up duration for local recurrence was 11.6 (range: 0.7-44.9) months, whereas the median duration to local recurrence was 6.3 months. Within 12 months, 29.3% of the patients experienced local recurrence, among whom 43.9% moved ≥ 1 mm during treatment, whereas 15.8% did not move. Univariable analysis found that both soft tissue involvement (OR = 10.3, 1.21-87.9; p = 0.033) and patient movement ≥ 1 mm (OR = 5.75, 1.45-22.8; p = 0.013) were associated with local recurrence. Multivariable analysis identified patient movement as an independent prognostic factor for local recurrence (OR = 5.15, 1.06-25.0; p = 0.042). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that patient movement during spinal SBRT was associated with local recurrence, emphasizing the need for better immobilization techniques and shorter delivery times to improve tumor control.
Asunto(s)
Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Radiocirugia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Masculino , Femenino , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/patología , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Factores de Riesgo , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , PronósticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study aimed to clarify the dosimetric impact of the respiratory motion of the liver on stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for spine metastasis and examine the utility of introducing beam avoidance (beam-off at specific gantry angles). METHODS: A total of 112 consecutive patients who underwent SBRT for spine metastasis between 2018 and 2024 were examined. Overall, 15 patients who had lesions near the liver dome were included in this study. Retrospective treatment plans were generated using computed tomography (CT) images acquired during inhalation and exhalation to evaluate the dosimetric impact of respiratory motion of the liver. The dose difference (DD) and relative value (DD%) were evaluated using the dose-volume histogram (DVH) metrics, planning target volume Dmax, D95%, spinal cord D0.035 cc, and esophagus D2.5 cc. The magnitude of the liver movements was evaluated based on differences of liver size Lave at the isocentric axial plane between the inspiratory and expiratory CT images. RESULTS: The DD in almost all DVH metrics tended to increase when the liver moved away from the target during inhalation: For example, Mean ± $ \pm $ a standard deviation (SD) DD in PTV D95% for the treatment plan incorporating beam avoidance and those without beam avoidance was 0.5 ± $\pm$ 0.3 and 0.9 ± $ \pm $ 0.6 Gy, respectively. The spinal cord D0.035 cc for those shows 0.4 ± $ \pm $ 0.2 and 0.7 ± $ \pm $ 0.7 Gy, respectively. The treatment plans without beam avoidance also showed moderate or strong correlations between Lave and DD for almost all DVH metrics. No correlation was seen in the beam avoidance plan. The spinal cord D0.035 cc revealed approximately 1 Gy or +4% in DD when Lave was < -4 cm. CONCLUSIONS: Respiratory motion of the liver dome can cause substantial dosimetric discrepancies in the dose delivered to the spinal cord, although the extent depends on patient variables. Dose assessment should be performed for determining the appropriate means of respiratory management, such as breath-hold. Alternatively, beam avoidance effectively mitigates the impact.
Asunto(s)
Hígado , Órganos en Riesgo , Radiocirugia , Dosificación Radioterapéutica , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada , Respiración , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Planificación de la Radioterapia Asistida por Computador/métodos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Masculino , Femenino , Radioterapia de Intensidad Modulada/métodos , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Hígado/efectos de la radiación , Órganos en Riesgo/efectos de la radiación , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Movimiento , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Pronóstico , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Population-based studies on the cause of readmission within 90 days after surgery or radiotherapy for metastatic spine tumors are scarce. We aimed to investigate the risk factors for readmission within 90 days after initial surgical or radiation treatment for metastatic spine tumors. METHODS: Patients who were diagnosed with metastatic spine tumors between 2012 and 2019 and underwent spinal magnetic resonance imaging within 1 year were classified according to treatment (surgical or radiotherapy groups), and the causes of the 90-day readmission and patient characteristics were compared. RESULTS: Overall, data from 15,815 patients (surgical group, 13,974 patients; radiotherapy group, 1841 patients) were evaluated. Radiotherapy was preferred in younger and male patients with a high Charlson Comorbidity Index, whereas surgery was mainly performed in patients with lumbar metastasis. Radiotherapy, age of 30-69 years, male sex, and Charlson Comorbidity Index >1 increased the risk of 90-day readmission in patients with metastatic spine tumors. The main causes of 90-day readmission among patients with metastatic spine tumors who received radiotherapy included tumor recurrence, chemotherapy, radiotherapy, and treatment of other organ metastases with radiotherapy. CONCLUSIONS: These study findings offer a better understanding of the causes of readmission following radiotherapy or surgical treatment in patients with metastatic spine tumors, and these results can help reduce postoperative morbidity and medical costs among these patients.
Asunto(s)
Readmisión del Paciente , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Femenino , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Factores de Riesgo , Adulto , Anciano , República de Corea/epidemiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Spine stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) for the treatment of metastatic disease is increasingly utilized owing to improved pain and local control over conventional regimens. Vertebral body collapse (VBC) is an important toxicity following spine SBRT. We investigated our institutional experience with spine SBRT as it relates to VBC and spinal instability neoplastic score (SINS). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Records of 83 patients with 100 spinal lesions treated with SBRT between 2007 and 2022 were reviewed. Clinical information was abstracted from the medical record. The primary endpoint was post-treatment VBC. Logistic univariate analysis was performed to identify clinical factors associated with VBC. RESULTS: Median dose and number of fractions used was 24 Gy and 3 fractions, respectively. There were 10 spine segments that developed VBC (10%) after spine SBRT. Median time to VBC was 2.4 months. Of the 11 spine segments that underwent kyphoplasty prior to SBRT, none developed subsequent VBC. No factors were associated with VBC on univariate analysis. CONCLUSIONS: The rate of vertebral body collapse following spine SBRT is low. Prophylactic kyphoplasty may provide protection against VBC and should be considered for patients at high risk for fracture.
Asunto(s)
Radiocirugia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Radiocirugia/efectos adversos , Radiocirugia/métodos , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adulto , Cuerpo Vertebral , Cifoplastia/efectos adversos , Cifoplastia/métodos , Fracturas de la Columna Vertebral/etiologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Sacrococcygeal chordomas have high recurrence rates and are challenging to treat. METHODS: In this phase II prospective, randomized, stratified trial, the safety and feasibility of hypofractionated ion radiation therapy were investigated. The primary focus was monitored through the incidence of Grade 3-5 NCI-CTC-AE toxicity. Secondary endpoints included local progression-free (LPFS) and overall survival (OS). RESULTS: The study enrolled 82 patients with primary (87 %) and recurrent (13 %) inoperable or incompletely resected sacral chordomas from January 2013 to July 2022, divided equally into proton therapy (Arm A) and carbon ion beam therapy (Arm B) groups, each receiving a total dose of 64 Gy (RBE) in 16 fractions, 5-6 fractions per week. Overall 74 % of patients received no previous surgery and 66 % of tumors were confirmed by a brachyury staining. The mean and median Gross Tumor Volume at the time of treatment (GTV) was 407 ml and 185 ml, respectively. The median follow-up of the surviving patients was 44.7 months, and the 2-year and 4-year OS rates were 96 % and 81 %, respectively. Factors such as smaller GTV and younger age trended towards better OS. The LPFS after 2-year and 4-year was 84 % and 70 %, respectively. Male gender emerged as a significant predictor of LPFS. There was no significant difference between the treatment groups. We observed five grade 4 wound healing disorders (6 %). CONCLUSION: The initial response rates were promising; however local control was not sustained. More comparative research on fractionation schemes is essential to refine treatment approaches for inoperable sacral chordoma.
Asunto(s)
Cordoma , Radioterapia de Iones Pesados , Terapia de Protones , Hipofraccionamiento de la Dosis de Radiación , Región Sacrococcígea , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Cordoma/radioterapia , Cordoma/mortalidad , Cordoma/patología , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia de Protones/efectos adversos , Terapia de Protones/métodos , Anciano , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto , Radioterapia de Iones Pesados/efectos adversos , Radioterapia de Iones Pesados/métodos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/mortalidad , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Obtaining timely postoperative radiotherapy (RT) following separation surgery is critical to avoid local recurrence of disease yet can be a challenge due to scheduling conflicts, insurance denials, and travel arrangements. In patients undergoing metastatic spine surgery for spinal cord compression, the authors sought to: 1) report the rate of postoperative RT, 2) describe reasons for patients not receiving postoperative RT, and 3) investigate factors that may predict whether a patient receives postoperative RT. METHODS: A single-center retrospective case series was undertaken of all patients who underwent metastatic spine surgery for extradural disease between January 2010 and January 2021. Inclusion criteria were patients with intermediate or radioresistant tumors with evidence of spinal cord compression who underwent surgery. The primary outcome was the occurrence of RT within 3 months following surgery. Multivariable logistic regression analysis was performed controlling for age, BMI, race, total number of decompressed levels, tumor size, other organ metastasis, and preoperative RT or chemotherapy to predict patients receiving postoperative RT. RESULTS: Of 239 patients undergoing spine surgery for metastatic disease, 113 (47.3%) received postoperative RT while 126 (52.7%) did not. In the postoperative RT group, 24 (21.2%) received stereotactic body radiation therapy while 89 (78.8%) received conventional external-beam radiation therapy. The most common reasons for patients not receiving postoperative RT included death or transfer to hospice (31.0%), RT not being recommended by radiation oncology (30.2%), and loss to follow-up (23.8%). On critical review with the radiation oncology department, the authors estimated that 101 of 126 (80.2%) patients who did not receive postoperative RT were potential candidates for postoperative RT. Patients who received postoperative RT had more documented inpatient (48.7% vs 32.5%, p < 0.001) and outpatient (100.0% vs 65.1%, p < 0.001) radiation oncology consultations than those who did not. Additionally, patients who received postoperative RT had a higher rate of postoperative chemotherapy (53.1% vs 25.4%, p < 0.001), while patients who did not receive postoperative RT had a higher rate of preoperative RT (7.1% vs 31.0%, p < 0.001). Multivariable analysis confirmed that patients who received preoperative RT had lower odds of undergoing postoperative RT (OR 0.14, 95% CI 0.06-0.34; p < 0.001), and patients who underwent postoperative chemotherapy had higher odds of undergoing postoperative RT (OR 3.83, 95% CI 2.05-7.17; p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: In the current study reflecting real-world care of patients with metastatic spine disease after undergoing separation surgery, 47% of patients did not receive postoperative RT, and 80% of those patients were potential candidates for postoperative RT. Radiation oncology consultation and postoperative chemotherapy were significantly associated with receiving postoperative RT, whereas preoperative RT was significantly associated with not receiving postoperative RT. The lack of timely postoperative RT highlights a potential gap in metastatic spine tumor care and underscores the necessity for prompt radiation oncology consultation and effective planning.
Asunto(s)
Compresión de la Médula Espinal , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Humanos , Femenino , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Anciano , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/cirugía , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/etiología , Compresión de la Médula Espinal/radioterapia , Adulto , RadiocirugiaRESUMEN
Metastatic spinal tumors are increasingly prevalent due to advancements in cancer treatment, leading to prolonged survival rates. This rising prevalence highlights the need for developing more effective therapeutic approaches to address this malignancy. Boron neutron capture therapy (BNCT) offers a promising solution by delivering targeted doses to tumors while minimizing damage to normal tissue. In this study, we evaluated the efficacy and safety of BNCT as a potential therapeutic option for spine metastases in mouse models induced by A549 human lung adenocarcinoma cells. The animal models were randomly allocated into three groups: untreated (n = 10), neutron irradiation only (n = 9), and BNCT (n = 10). Each mouse was administered 4-borono-L-phenylalanine (250 mg/kg) intravenously, followed by measurement of boron concentrations 2.5 h later. Overall survival, neurological function of the hindlimb, and any adverse events were assessed post irradiation. The tumor-to-normal spinal cord and blood boron concentration ratios were 3.6 and 2.9, respectively, with no significant difference observed between the normal and compressed spinal cord tissues. The BNCT group exhibited significantly prolonged survival rates compared with the other groups (vs. untreated, p = 0.0015; vs. neutron-only, p = 0.0104, log-rank test). Furthermore, the BNCT group demonstrated preserved neurological function relative to the other groups (vs. untreated, p = 0.0004; vs. neutron-only, p = 0.0051, multivariate analysis of variance). No adverse events were observed post irradiation. These findings indicate that BNCT holds promise as a novel treatment modality for metastatic spinal tumors.
Asunto(s)
Terapia por Captura de Neutrón de Boro , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral , Terapia por Captura de Neutrón de Boro/métodos , Animales , Ratones , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/radioterapia , Neoplasias de la Columna Vertebral/secundario , Neoplasias Pulmonares/radioterapia , Neoplasias Pulmonares/patología , Fenilalanina/análogos & derivados , Fenilalanina/uso terapéutico , Células A549 , Médula Espinal/efectos de la radiación , Médula Espinal/patología , Línea Celular Tumoral , Boro/uso terapéutico , FemeninoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Spinal chordoma treatment guidelines recommend resection. However, in patients in whom gross-total resection (GTR) is achieved, the benefits of radiation therapy (RT) are unclear. Therefore, the authors performed a systematic review to determine if RT is associated with postoperative progression-free survival (PFS) or overall survival (OS) after achieving GTR of spinal chordoma. METHODS: The PubMed database was searched for studies including individualized data of patients undergoing GTR with or without RT for spinal chordoma. Patients < 18 years of age or those who underwent stereotactic body RT were excluded. Qualitative assessment was performed using Newcastle-Ottawa Scale guidelines. Log-rank tests for time-to-event data and a Cox proportional-hazards model were generated for a multivariable statistical model. RESULTS: Complete data of 132 patients were retrieved, with 37 (28%) patients receiving adjuvant RT and 95 (72%) not receiving adjuvant RT. The mean follow-up was not statistically significantly different between those undergoing RT and not undergoing RT (54.02 months and 65.43 months, respectively). Patients were more likely not to undergo RT if their disease was located in the sacrum versus the mobile spine (p < 0.001). When controlling for age ≥ 65 years, male sex, disease location, and treatment year ≥ 2010, patients undergoing RT had similar PFS and OS when compared with those not undergoing RT on multivariable survival analysis (HR 0.935 [95% CI 0.703-2.340], p = 0.844 and HR 2.078 [95% CI 0.848-5.090], p = 0.110, respectively). However, age ≥ 65 years was associated with poorer OS in adjusted analyses (HR 2.761 [95% CI 1.185-6.432], p = 0.018) relative to patients < 65 years of age. CONCLUSIONS: After achieving GTR of spinal chordoma, the utility of RT on PFS and OS remains unclear. Age ≥ 65 years appears to be associated with OS in spinal chordoma patients. Additional multicenter prospective studies are needed to determine the utility of RT in this patient population.