RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gallbladder carcinoma is the most common malignant tumor of the biliary system, and has a poor overall prognosis. Poor prognosis in patients with gallbladder carcinoma is associated with the aggressive nature of the tumor, subtle clinical symptoms, ineffective adjuvant treatment, and lack of reliable biomarkers. PURPOSE: Therefore, evaluating the prognostic factors of patients with gallbladder carcinoma can help improve diagnostic and treatment methods, allowing for tailored therapies that could benefit patient survival. METHODS: This article systematically reviews the factors affecting the prognosis of gallbladder carcinoma, with the aim of evaluating prognostic risk in patients. CONCLUSION: A comprehensive and in-depth understanding of prognostic indicators affecting patient survival is helpful for assessing patient survival risk and formulating personalized treatment plans.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/terapia , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/diagnóstico , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Humanos , Pronóstico , Biomarcadores de Tumor/metabolismoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a highly aggressive malignancy, with limited survival profiles after curative surgeries. This study aimed to develop a practical model for predicting the postoperative overall survival (OS) in GBC patients. METHODS: Patients from three hospitals were included. Two centers (N = 102 and 100) were adopted for model development and internal validation, and the third center (N = 85) was used for external testing. Univariate and stepwise multivariate Cox regression were used for feature selection. A nomogram for 1-, 3-, and 5-year postoperative survival rates was constructed accordingly. Performance assessment included Harrell's concordance index (C-index), receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves and calibration curves. Kaplan-Meier curves were utilized to evaluate the risk stratification results of the nomogram. Decision curves were used to reflect the net benefit. RESULTS: Eight factors, TNM stage, age-adjusted Charlson Comorbidity Index (aCCI), body mass index (BMI), R0 resection, blood platelet count, and serum levels of albumin, CA125, CA199 were incorporated in the nomogram. The time-dependent C-index consistently exceeded 0.70 from 6 months to 5 years, and time-dependent ROC revealed an area under the curve (AUC) of over 75% for 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival. The calibration curves, Kaplan-Meier curves and decision curves also indicated good prognostic performance and clinical benefit, surpassing traditional indicators TNM staging and CA199 levels. The reliability of results was further proved in the independent external testing set. CONCLUSIONS: The novel nomogram exhibited good prognostic efficacy and robust generalizability in GBC patients, which might be a promising tool for aiding clinical decision-making.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Nomogramas , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/sangre , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Tasa de Supervivencia , Pronóstico , Anciano , Curva ROC , Estudios de Seguimiento , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Colecistectomía/mortalidad , Colecistectomía/métodosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Lenvatinib, programmed cell death 1 (PD-1) antibodies, and gemcitabine and oxaliplatin (GEMOX) chemotherapy have shown significant antitumor activity as first-line therapy against biliary tract cancer. This study evaluated their efficacy and safety as non-first-line therapy in advanced gallbladder cancer (GBC). METHODS: Patients with advanced GBC who received lenvatinib combined with anti-PD-1 antibodies and GEMOX chemotherapy as a non-first-line therapy were retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoints were overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS), and the secondary endpoints were objective response rate (ORR) and safety. RESULTS: A total of 36 patients with advanced GBC were included in this study. The median follow-up time was 11.53 (95% confidence interval (CI): 2.2-20.9) months, and the ORR was 36.1%. The median OS and PFS were 15.1 (95% CI: 3.2-26.9) and 6.1 (95% CI: 4.9-7.2) months, respectively. The disease control rate (DCR) and clinical benefit rate (CBR) were 75% and 61.1%, respectively. Subgroup analysis demonstrated that patients with programmed cell death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) expression had significantly longer PFS and OS than those without PD-L1 expression. Additionally, patients with a neutrophil-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) < 5.57 had a longer OS than those with an NLR ≥ 5.57. All patients experienced adverse events (AEs), with 61.1% experiencing grade 3 or 4 AEs, including myelosuppression (13.9%) and fatigue (13.3%), alanine transaminase or aspartate transaminase levels (8.3%), and diarrhea (8.3%). No grade 5 AEs were reported. CONCLUSION: Anti-PD-1 antibodies combined with lenvatinib and GEMOX chemotherapy are effective and well-tolerated as a non-first-line therapy in advanced GBC. PD-L1 expression and baseline NLR may potentially predict treatment efficacy.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Desoxicitidina , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Compuestos de Fenilurea , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1 , Quinolinas , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quinolinas/uso terapéutico , Quinolinas/administración & dosificación , Quinolinas/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Fenilurea/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Fenilurea/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptor de Muerte Celular Programada 1/antagonistas & inhibidores , Adulto , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de Puntos de Control Inmunológico/administración & dosificación , Gemcitabina , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Compuestos OrganoplatinosRESUMEN
Objective: To analyze the 5-year relative survival rate of cancer in Henan province based on cancer registration data. Methods: Cancer survival data were extracted from the cancer registration database of Henan province with the diagnosis date between January 1, 2010 and December 31, 2019 were included. The closing date of follow-up was set as December 31, 2019. The 5-year relative survival rate of cancer was calculated using the period survival analysis method and the Ederer II method in the R package "periodR", and the interest period was between 2015 and 2019. Results: During the period of 2015-2019, the overall 5-year relative survival rate of cancer patients in Henan province was 43.6%, and after age-standardization, it was 40.2%. The overall 5-year relative survival rate showed the characteristics of higher survival rate in females than males (45.9% vs 34.7%, Z=39.60, Pï¼0.001) and higher survival rate in urban areas than rural areas (44.9% vs 39.1%, Z=12.97, Pï¼0.001). The 5-year relative survival rate for cancer patients among children aged 0-14 was 60.2%, and for adults aged 15 and above, it was 43.5%, which was standardized to 40.2% after age adjustment. There are two types of cancers with a standardized 5-year relative survival rate exceeding 70% (thyroid cancer at 82.2% and breast cancer at 71.6%), and four cancers with a rate below 30% (pancreatic cancer at 18.2%, liver cancer at 19.6%, lung cancer at 24.0%, and gallbladder cancer at 26.6%). Conclusion: The cancer 5-year survival rate in Henan Province is lower than that of the national average, indicating the need for continued enhancement of cancer prevention and control measures.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias , Humanos , China/epidemiología , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias/mortalidad , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Tasa de Supervivencia , Niño , Adolescente , Adulto , Preescolar , Lactante , Adulto Joven , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Población Rural/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Pancreáticas/mortalidad , Recién Nacido , Neoplasias Pulmonares/mortalidad , Anciano , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Factores Sexuales , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/epidemiología , Sistema de Registros , Población Urbana/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de EdadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Retroperitoneal lymphadenopathy is considered a metastatic disease in GBC; however, some surgical series of radical surgery with enlarged RPLN who underwent RPLN dissection have shown results marginally inferior to those without enlarged RPLN. Radiological RPLN comprises a major proportion of advanced non-metastatic GBC. There is dilemma in the intent of treatment to be offered in such cases. We are reporting our series of outcome of GBC with RPLN treated with first-line CT followed by consolidation CTRT. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Non-metastatic locally advanced GBC with good performance status (KPS ≥ 80) were initiated on first-line CT (cisplatin-gemcitabine), and thereafter, responders were evaluated by CECT-angiography and PET-CT scan for resectability. If found unresectable, they were offered consolidation CTRT to a dose of 45 Gy by conventional fractionation (3D-CRT technique) along with concurrent capecitabine at 1250 mg/m2 to GBC and regional lymphatics including RPLN. Thereafter, boost dose of 9 Gy/5# was given to GBC only. Response assessment was done using CECT abdomen by RECIST criteria v 1.1. Outcomes (overall survival) of the two groups (RPLN vs non-RPLN) were computed with Kaplan-Meier survival curves and chi-square tests using SPSS v 20. RESULTS: Among 189 patients of advanced non-metastatic GBC recruited from 2011 to 2022, 80 had RPLN. The demographic features of both groups were comparable. Overall, 68% of the patients were women, 30% underwent upfront stenting for obstructive jaundice, and 90% had T3 and T4 disease. Only 10% had undergone upfront laparoscopic staging and had pathologically proven RPLN. Forty percent of the patients received four cycles of CT only and 50% of the patients received six cycles or more and 33% received CTRT. By RECIST criteria, 10% vs 16% achieved complete response (CR), 39% vs 41% achieved partial response (PR), 16% vs 15% achieved stable disease (SD), 2.7% vs 6% had disease progression (PD), and 14.5% vs 3.7% were non-evaluable in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group, respectively. 12% vs 6% could undergo radical surgery in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group (p = 0.03). The median OS was 9 months (95% CI 7.6-10.3 months) vs 10 months (95% CI 8-9.8 months) (p = NS) in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group, respectively. In those who received CT only, the median OS was 7 months vs 8 months, while in those who received CT followed by CTRT, the median OS was 14 months vs 13 months (p = 0.65) in non-RPLN group vs RPLN group, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Based on this analysis, we conclude that RPLN constitutes a major proportion of advanced non-metastatic GBC and has outcomes similar to those without RPLN if treated with radical intent. RPLN should not be considered a metastatic disease and should be treated with radical intent.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Linfadenopatía , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Linfadenopatía/patología , Linfadenopatía/terapia , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/terapia , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Anciano , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Quimioradioterapia/mortalidad , Espacio Retroperitoneal/patología , Gemcitabina , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estudios Retrospectivos , Metástasis LinfáticaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is a biliary tract malignancy characterized by its high lethality. Although the incidence of GBC is low in most countries, specific areas such as Chile display a high incidence. Our collaborative study sought to compare clinical and molecular features of GBC cohorts from Chile and the United States with a focus on ERBB2 alterations. METHODS: Patients were accrued at Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center (MSK) or the Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile (PUC). Clinical information was retrieved from medical records. Genomic analysis was performed by the next-generation sequencing platform MSK-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets. RESULTS: A total of 260 patients with GBC were included, 237 from MSK and 23 from PUC. There were no significant differences in the clinical characteristics between the patients identified at MSK and at PUC except in terms of lithiasis prevalence which was significantly higher in the PUC cohort (85% v 44%; P = .0003). The prevalence of ERBB2 alterations was comparable between the two cohorts (15% v 9%; P = .42). Overall, ERBB2 alterations were present in 14% of patients (8% with ERBB2 amplification, 4% ERBB2 mutation, 1.5% concurrent amplification and mutation, and 0.4% ERBB2 fusion). Notably, patients with GBC that harbored ERBB2 alterations had better overall survival (OS) versus their ERBB2-wild type counterparts (22.3 months v 11.8 months; P = .024). CONCLUSION: The prevalence of lithiasis seems to be higher in Chilean versus US patients with GBC. A similar prevalence of ERBB2 alterations of overall 14% and better OS suggests that a proportion of them could benefit from human epidermal growth factor receptor type 2-targeted therapies. The smaller cohort of Chile, where the disease prevalence is higher, is a reminder and invitation for the need of more robust next-generation sequencing analyses globally.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Receptor ErbB-2 , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/genética , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/epidemiología , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Chile/epidemiología , Receptor ErbB-2/genética , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Mutación , Estudios de Cohortes , Adulto , Genómica , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Secuenciación de Nucleótidos de Alto RendimientoRESUMEN
Curative resection stands as the sole potential cure for gallbladder cancer (GBC); nevertheless, a dearth of knowledge persists regarding long-term follow-up data and prognostic factors that hinder achieving a cure post-surgery. A retrospective cohort study was conducted by analyzing pathologically confirmed initial resections for GBC between 2000 and 2013 across three Chinese medical centers. The concept of observed cure refers to a 10-year survival period devoid of any disease recurrence. Employing a semiparametric proportional hazards mixture cure model enabled the identification of clinicopathological factors impeding a cure for GBC post-surgery. In our current study, a total of 331 patients were included, with a follow-up period exceeding a decade. The median overall survival (OS) was recorded at 31.6 months, with 39 patients (11.78%) achieving a 10-year OS, classified as 10-year survivors. Within this subset, 36 patients reached a 10-year relapse-free survival, denoting cure, and yielding an observed cure rate of 10.88%. Notably, factors such as combined surgical resection involving invaded organs, positive lymph node metastasis, and R1 resection (below 1%) were identified as virtually precluding a cure. Additionally, patients with T3-4 stage, hepatic invasion, advanced AJCC stage or poor tumor differentiation exhibited a low likelihood of achieving cure (below 5%). The discovery of these prognostic factors holds significant value in tailoring individualized treatment strategies and enhancing clinical decision-making processes.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estudios de Seguimiento , Anciano , Adulto , Colecistectomía , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia/epidemiología , Metástasis Linfática , Estadificación de Neoplasias , China/epidemiología , Pronóstico , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Anciano de 80 o más AñosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Minimally invasive oncological resections have become increasingly widespread in the surgical management of cancers. However, the role of minimally invasive surgery (MIS) for gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains unclear. We aim to perform a systematic review and network meta-analysis of existing literature to evaluate the safety and feasibility of laparoscopic and robotic surgery in the management of GBC compared to open surgery (OS) by comparing outcomes. METHODS: A literature search of the PubMed/MEDLINE (2000 to December 2021) and EMBASE (2000 to December 2021) databases was conducted. The primary outcome studied was overall survival, and secondary outcomes studied were postoperative morbidity, severe complications, incidence of bile leak, length of hospital stay, operation time, R0 resection rate, local recurrence and lymph node yield. RESULTS: Thirty-two full-text articles met the eligibility criteria and were included in the final analysis with a total of 5883 patients undergoing either OS or MIS (laparoscopic or robotic) for GBC. 1- and 2-stage meta-analyses did not reveal any significant differences between OS, laparoscopic and robotic surgery in terms of overall survival, R0 resection, lymph node harvest, local recurrence and post-operative complications. Patients who underwent OS had significantly longer hospitalization stay and intra-operative blood loss compared to those who underwent laparoscopic or robotic surgery. Network meta-analysis did not reveal any significant differences between post-operative and survival outcomes of laparoscopic vs robotic surgery groups. CONCLUSION: This network meta-analysis suggests that both laparoscopic and robotic surgery are safe and effective approaches in the surgical management of GBC, with post-operative and survival outcomes comparable to OS. An MIS approach may also lead to shorter hospitalization stay, less intraoperative blood loss and post-operative complications compared to OS. There was no obvious benefit of either MIS approach (laparoscopic versus robotic) over the other.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/efectos adversos , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Metaanálisis en Red , Tempo Operativo , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodosRESUMEN
The prognostic significance of the signet-ring cell component in gallbladder carcinoma (GBC) has not been systematically evaluated. The aim of this study was to assess the similarities and differences between gallbladder signet-ring cell carcinoma (GBSRCA) and gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBAC) in terms of clinicopathological features and long-term survival. Using the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database, we analyzed 6,612 patients diagnosed with gallbladder cancer between 2000 and 2021. The cohort included 147 patients with GBSRCA and 6,465 with GBAC. Patients with GBSRCA were significantly younger, with 33.3% being age 60 or younger compared to 23.9% of patients with GBAC (p = 0.009). There was a higher proportion of females in the GBSRCA group (77.6%) compared to the GBAC group (70.1%, p = 0.049). GBSRCA was associated with a more advanced tumor stage (T3-T4: 56.5% vs. 44.4%, P = 0.004), higher rates of lymph node metastasis (43.5% vs. 28.0%, P < 0.001), and poorer differentiation status (poorly to undifferentiated: 80.3% vs. 29.7%, P < 0.001). Survival analysis revealed that patients with GBSRCA had significantly worse overall survival (OS) and cancer-specific survival (CSS) compared to patients with GBAC (p < 0.001). GBSRCA was an independent prognostic factor for OS (P = 0.001) in the entire cohort, while the T stage and N stage were independent prognostic factors for OS and CSS in patients with GBSRCA. Even after propensity score matching, patients with GBSRCA still had a poorer prognosis.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/patología , Carcinoma de Células en Anillo de Sello/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Pronóstico , Programa de VERF , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Metástasis Linfática/patología , Adulto , Estadificación de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
Background: Gallbladder mixed neuroendocrine-non-neuroendocrine neoplasm generally consists of a gallbladder neuroendocrine tumor and a non-neuroendocrine component. The World Health Organization (WHO) in 2019 established a guideline requiring each component, both neuroendocrine and non-neuroendocrine, to account for a minimum of 30% of the tumor mass. Methods: Patients after surgery resection and diagnosed at microscopy evaluation with pure gallbladder neuroendocrine carcinoma (GBNEC), gallbladder mixed adeno-neuroendocrine carcinoma (GBMANEC, GBNEC≥30%), and gallbladder carcinoma mixed with a small fraction of GBNEC (GBNEC <30%) between 2010 and 2022 at West China Hospital of Sichuan University were collated for the analyses. Demographic features, surgical variables, and tumor characteristics were evaluated for association with patients' overall and recurrence-free survival (OS and RFS). Results: The study included 26 GBNEC, 11 GBMANEC, 4 gallbladder squamous-cell carcinoma (GBSCC), and 7 gallbladder adenocarcinoma (GBADC) mixed with a small fraction of GBNEC. All patients had stage III or higher tumors (AJCC8th edition). The majority of included patients (79.17%) underwent curative surgical resection (R0), with only ten patients having tumoral resection margins. In the analysis comparing patients with GBNEC percentage (GBNEC≥30% vs. GBNEC<30%), the basic demographics and tumor characteristics of most patients were comparable. The prognosis of these patients was also comparable, with a median OS of 23.65 months versus 20.40 months (P=0.13) and a median RFS of 17.1 months versus 12.3 months (P=0.24). However, patients with GBADC or GBSCC mixed with GBNEC <30% had a statistically significant decreased OS and RFS (both P<0.0001)) compared with GBNEC and GBMANEC. Patients with GBNEC who exhibited advanced tumor stages and lymphovascular invasion had a higher risk of experiencing worse overall survival (OS) and recurrence-free survival (RFS). However, a 30% GBNEC component was not identified as an independent risk factor. Conclusion: Patients with GBNEC were frequently diagnosed at advanced stages and their prognosis is poor. The 30% percentage of the GBNEC component is not related to the patient's survival.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Neuroendocrino , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/patología , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/mortalidad , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/cirugía , Carcinoma Neuroendocrino/diagnóstico , Anciano , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/cirugía , Tasa de SupervivenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The effect of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NACT) in gallbladder cancer (GBC) patients remains controversial. The aim of this study was to assess the impact of NACT on overall survival (OS) and cancer specific survival (CSS) in patients with localized or locoregionally advanced GBC, and to explore possible protective predictors for prognosis. METHODS: Data for patients with localized or locoregionally advanced GBC (i.e., categories cTx-cT4, cN0-2, and cM0) from 2004 to 2020 were collected from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. Patients in the NACT and non-NACT groups were propensity score matched (PSM) 1:3, and the Kaplan-Meier method and log-rank test were performed to analyze the impact of NACT on OS and CSS. Univariable and multivariable Cox regression models were applied to identify the possible prognostic factors. Subgroup analysis was conducted to identify patients who would benefit from NACT. RESULTS: Of the 2676 cases included, 78 NACT and 234 non-NACT patients remained after PSM. In localized or locoregionally advanced GBC patients, the median OS of the NACT and non-NACT was 31 and 16 months (log-rank P < 0.01), and the median CSS of NACT and non-NACT was 32 and 17 months (log-rank P < 0.01), respectively. Longer median OS (31 vs 17 months, log-rank P < 0.01) and CSS (32 vs 20 months, log-rank P < 0.01) was associated with NACT compared with surgery alone. Multivariable Cox regression analysis showed that NACT, stage, and surgery type were prognostic factors for OS and CSS in GBC patients. Subgroup analysis revealed that the survival hazard ratios (HRs) of NACT vs non-NACT for localized or locoregionally advanced GBC patients were significant in most subgroups. CONCLUSIONS: NACT may provide therapeutic benefits for localized or locoregionally advanced GBC patients, especially for those with advanced stage, node-positive, poorly differentiated or undifferentiated disease. NACT combined with radical surgery was associated with a survival advantage. Therefore, NACT combined with surgery may provide a better treatment option for resectable GBC patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Puntaje de Propensión , Programa de VERF , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/terapia , Femenino , Masculino , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estimación de Kaplan-MeierRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Systemic inflammation and nutrition are vital for tumor progression. This study aimed to identify prognostic inflammation nutrition markers and develop a predictive nomogram for gallbladder cancer (GBC). METHODS: A total of 123 patients with GBC who underwent surgical resection at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University and Suzhou Kowloon Hospital were included in our study. The final prognostic variables were identified using univariate and multivariate analyses. A nomogram model was then established, and the consistency index (C-index), calibration curves, and Kaplan-Meier analysis were performed to evaluate the accuracy and discrimination of the nomogram. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) suggested that our nomogram had better predictive ability and clinical feasibility than a published model. RESULTS: The cox regression analysis showed that carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) > 4.580, albumin-bilirubin (ALBI) > -2.091, geriatric nutritional risk index (GNRI) < 90.83, T3-T4, and N2 are independent prognostic factors. A predictive nomogram was constructed with a C-index of 0.793. In the calibration curves, the nomogram-predicted 1-, 3-, and 5-year survival matched well with the actual survival. Kaplan-Meier analysis showed that the high-risk group had worse survival than the low-risk group (P < 0.001). Finally, our nomogram achieved better 1-, 3- and 5-year AUCs than an established model (0.871, 0.844, and 0.781 vs. 0.753, 0.750, and 0.693). DCA also confirmed that our model outperformed the established model. CONCLUSIONS: In conclusion, our study revealed that CEA > 4.580, GNRI < 90.83, ALBI > -2.091, T3-T4 stage, and N2 were related to clinical outcomes of patients with GBC after surgical resection. The constructed nomogram has superior predictive ability and clinical practicality.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Nomogramas , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/sangre , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Pronóstico , Anciano , Antígeno Carcinoembrionario/sangre , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Evaluación Nutricional , Curva ROC , Estado Nutricional , Inflamación/sangre , Albúmina Sérica/análisis , Albúmina Sérica/metabolismo , Biomarcadores de Tumor/sangre , Bilirrubina/sangre , Modelos de Riesgos Proporcionales , Biomarcadores/sangreRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The association between marital status and gallbladder cancer (GBC) remains uncertain. This study aimed to verify the relationship between marital status and GBC and construct a prognostic nomogram to predict the impact of marital status on GBC patients. METHOD: GBC patients were divided into married and unmarried groups using data from the Surveillance, Epidemiology, and End Results (SEER) database. We employed competing risk analyses, propensity score matching (PSM), and Kaplan-Meier survival analyses. The relationship between marital status and GBC was then verified, and the predicted nomogram was constructed. RESULTS: A total of 3913 GBC patients were obtained from the SEER database, and an additional 76 GBC patients from Hangzhou Traditional Chinese Medicine Hospital were selected as the external validation group. The competing risk analysis revealed a significant disparity in the 5-year cumulative incidence of cancer-specific death (CSD) between the two cohorts (59.1% vs. 65.2%, p = 0.003). Furthermore, the multivariate competing hazards regression analysis identified a significant association (HR, 1.17; 95% CI, 1.04-1.31; p = 0.007) between marital status and CSD. To assess the 1-, 3-, and 5-year risks of CSD, a comprehensive competing event nomogram was constructed using factors derived from the multivariate analysis. The area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) values for the 1-, 3-, and 5-year training cohorts were 0.806, 0.785, and 0.776, respectively. In the internal validation cohort, these values were 0.798, 0.790, and 0.790, while the external validation cohort exhibited AUC values of 0.748, 0.835, and 0.883 for the corresponding time intervals. Furthermore, calibration curves demonstrated a commendable level of concordance between the observed and predicted probabilities of CSD. CONCLUSION: Marriage was a protective factor for GBC patients after taking competing risk into consideration. The proposed nomogram demonstrated exceptional predictive power.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Estado Civil , Nomogramas , Programa de VERF , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Femenino , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Anciano , Pronóstico , Puntaje de Propensión , Factores de Riesgo , China/epidemiologíaAsunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Colecistectomía/métodos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Up to 90% of patients undergo inadequate resection for incidentally diagnosed T1b-T3 gallbladder cancer (GBC). We evaluated whether adjuvant therapies (ATs) are associated with prolonged overall survival (OS) for patients undergoing inadequate resection of T1b-T3 GBC. METHODS: Patients who underwent inadequate resection, defined as simple cholecystectomy, for T1b-T3, Nx-N2, and M0 GBC were identified from the National Cancer Database (2004-2016). Patient characteristics, variables associated with AT use, and OS were described using the chi-square test, multivariable logistical regression, Kaplan-Meier, and Cox proportional hazard models. RESULTS: Of 1386 patients who met inclusion criteria, most received no AT (64%), 20% received chemotherapy (CT), and 16% received chemoradiotherapy (CRT). Patients who received no AT were generally older (51% ≥ 75 y) and had no comorbidities (65% Charlson Comorbidity Index 0). Among those who received AT, CRT rather than CT, tended to be employed for patients who were older (≥75 y) or had more comorbidities (Charlson Comorbidity Index ≥1). Patients with advanced disease (T3, positive lymph nodes, or positive margins) were more likely to receive CRT. For T1b-T3 GBC, any AT was associated with prolonged median OS compared to no AT (22 months versus 15 mo, P < 0.01). Relative to no AT, CT (hazard ratio 0.76, 95% confidence interval 0.67-0.92) and CRT (0.59, 95% confidence interval 0.49-0.72) were associated with decreased risk of death. CONCLUSIONS: AT was associated with prolonged OS for patients with inadequately resected T1b-T3 GBC. CRT may have a role in treatment for patients with high-risk disease following inadequate resection of T1b-T3 GBC.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/terapia , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Femenino , Masculino , Anciano , Persona de Mediana Edad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Colecistectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Vesícula Biliar/patología , Adulto , Estimación de Kaplan-MeierRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: For patients with T1b gallbladder cancer or greater, an adequate lymphadenectomy should include at least 6 nodes. Studies comparing short- and long-term outcomes of the open approach with those of laparoscopy and robotic approaches are limited, with small sample sizes, and there are none comparing laparoscopic and robotic approaches. This study compared patients who underwent robotic, laparoscopic, and open resection of gallbladder cancer, evaluating short- and long-term outcomes. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter retrospective study of patients with T1b gallbladder cancer or greater (excluding combined organ resection and T4) who underwent open, laparoscopic, and robotic liver resection and lymphadenectomy between January 2012 and December 2022. The 3 groups were matched in terms of patient baseline and disease characteristics based on propensity score matching, comparing robotic with open and robotic with laparoscopic groups. RESULTS: We enrolled 575 patients from 37 institutions. After propensity score matching, the median number of harvested nodes was higher in the robotic group than in the open (7 vs 5; P = .0150) and laparoscopic groups (7 vs 4; P < .001). The Pringle maneuver time was shorter with robotic resection than with laparoscopy (38 vs 59 minutes; P = .0034), and the robotic group also had a lower conversion rate (3% vs 14%, respectively; P = .005) and less estimated blood loss than open and laparoscopic resections. The perioperative morbidity and mortality rates did not differ. The robotic and laparoscopic approaches were associated with faster functional recovery than the open group. In the multivariate analysis, the factors related to the retrieval of at least 6 nodes were the robotic approach over open (odds ratio, 5.1529) and over laparoscopy (odds ratio, 6.7289) and the center experience (≥20 minimally invasive liver resections/year) (odds ratio, 4.962). After a mean follow-up of 42.6 months, overall survival and disease-free survival were not different between groups. CONCLUSION: Compared with open and laparoscopic surgeries, the robotic approach for gallbladder cancer performed in a center with appropriate experience in minimally invasive surgery can provide adequate node retrieval.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Puntaje de Propensión , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/cirugía , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/métodos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Robotizados/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Hepatectomía/métodos , Tempo Operativo , Estadificación de NeoplasiasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gallbladder cancer (GBC) is an aggressive malignancy that is usually diagnosed at a late stage. Prior data showed increasing incidence of GBC in the US. However, little is known about race/ethnic-specific incidence and mortality trends of GBC per stage at diagnosis. Therefore, we aimed to conduct a time-trend analysis of GBC incidence and mortality rates categorized by race/ethnicity and stage-at-diagnosis. METHODS: Age-adjusted GBC incidence and mortality rates were calculated using SEER*Stat software from the United States Cancer Statistics database (covers ~98% of US population between 2001 and 2020) and NCHS (covers ~100% of the US population between 2000 and 2020) databases, respectively. Race/Ethnic groups were Non-Hispanic-White (NHW), Non-Hispanic-Black (NHB), Hispanic, Non-Hispanic-Asian/Pacific-Islander (NHAPI), and Non-Hispanic-American-Indian/Alaska-Native (NHAIAN). Stage-at-diagnoses were all stages, early, regional, and distant stages. Joinpoint regression was used to generate time-trends [annual percentage change (APC) and average APC (AAPC)] with parametric estimations and a two-sided t-test (p-value cut-off 0.05). RESULTS: 76,873 patients were diagnosed with GBC with decreasing incidence rates in all races/ethnicities except NHB who experienced an increasing trend between 2001 and 2014 (APC = 2.08, p < 0.01) and plateauing afterward (APC = -1.21, p = 0.31); (AAPC = 1.03, p = 0.03). Among early-stage tumors (9927 patients), incidence rates were decreasing only in Hispanic (AAPC = -4.24, p = 0.006) while stable in other races/ethnicities (NHW: AAPC = -2.61, p = 0.39; NHB: AAPC = -1.73, p = 0.36). For regional-stage tumors (29,690 patients), GBC incidence rates were decreasing only in NHW (AAPC = -1.61, p < 0.001) while stable in other races/ethnicities (NHB: AAPC = 0.73, p = 0.34; Hispanic: AAPC = -1.58, p = 0.24; NHAPI: AAPC = -1.22, p = 0.07). For distant-stage tumors (31,735 patients), incidence rates were increasing in NHB (AAPC = 2.72, p < 0.001), decreasing in Hispanic (AAPC = -0.64, p = 0.04), and stable in NHW (AAPC = 0.07, p = 0.84) and NHAPI (AAPC = 0.79, p = 0.13). There were 43,411 deaths attributed to GBC with decreasing mortality rates in all races/ethnicities except NHB who experienced a stable trend (AAPC = 0.25, p = 0.25). CONCLUSION: Nationwide data over the last two decades show that NHB patients experienced increasing GBC incidence between 2001 and 2014 followed by stabilization of the rates. This increase was driven by late-stage tumors and occurred in the first decade. NHB also experienced non-improving GBC mortality, compared to other race and ethnic groups who had decreasing mortality. This can be due to lack of timely-access to healthcare leading to delayed diagnosis and worse outcomes. Future studies are warranted to investigate contributions to the revealed racial and ethnic disparities, especially in NHB, to improve early detection.
Asunto(s)
Etnicidad , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Grupos Raciales , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/etnología , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Disparidades en el Estado de Salud , Incidencia , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Programa de VERF , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
Importance: There is limited evidence with regard to the benefit of adjuvant chemotherapy chemoradiotherapy in resected gallbladder cancers (GBCs). Objective: To establish a baseline survival rate for operated GBCs in patients receiving either gemcitabine plus cisplatin (GC) or capecitabine and capecitabine concurrent with chemoradiation (CCRT). Design, Setting, and Participants: The GECCOR-GB study was a multicenter, open-label, randomized phase 2 noncomparator "pick the winner" design trial of adjuvant GC and CCRT in patients with resected histologically confirmed adenocarcinoma or adenosquamous carcinoma of the gallbladder, (stage II/III) with no local residual tumor (R0) or microscopic residual tumor (R1). The study was carried out in 3 tertiary cancer institutions in India. Patients 18 years or older with adequate end-organ functions, and Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group Performance Status of 1 or lower between May 2019 and February 2022 were enrolled. The cutoff date for data analysis was February 28, 2023. Interventions: Patients were randomized 1:1 to receive either GC every 3 weeks (maximum of 6 cycles) or CCRT comprising capecitabine with concurrent chemoradiation (capecitabine concurrent with radiotherapy) sandwiched between capecitabine chemotherapy. Main Outcomes and Measures: The primary outcome was disease-free survival (DFS) at 1 year in randomized patients. This study was conducted as 2 parallel, single-stage phase 2 clinical trials. Within each treatment arm, a 1-year DFS rate of less than 59% was considered as insufficient activity, whereas a 1-year DFS rate of 77% or higher would be considered as sufficient activity. Results: With a median follow-up of 23 months, 90 patients were randomized, 45 in each arm. Overall, there were 31 women (69%) and 14 men (31%) in the GC arm with a mean (range) age of 56 (33-72) years and 34 women (76%) and 11 men (24%) in the CCRT group with a mean (range) age of 55 (26-69) years. In the GC and CCRT arms, 1-year DFS and estimated 2-year DFS was 88.9% (95% CI, 79.5-98.3) and 74.8% (95% CI, 60.4-89.2), and 77.8% (95% CI, 65.4-90.2) and 74.8% (95% CI, 59.9-86.3), respectively. Completion rates for planned treatment was 82% in the GC arm and 62% in the CCRT arm. Conclusions and Relevance: In this randomized clinical trial, GC and CCRT crossed the prespecified trial end points of 1-year DFS in patients with resected stage II/III GBCs. The results set a baseline for a larger phase 3 trial evaluating both regimens in operated GBCs. Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: CTRI/2019/05/019323I.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Quimioradioterapia , Cisplatino , Desoxicitidina , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar , Gemcitabina , Humanos , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/terapia , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/tratamiento farmacológico , Desoxicitidina/análogos & derivados , Desoxicitidina/uso terapéutico , Desoxicitidina/administración & dosificación , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Cisplatino/uso terapéutico , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Anciano , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Adulto , Capecitabina/uso terapéutico , Capecitabina/administración & dosificación , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/terapia , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/mortalidad , Carcinoma Adenoescamoso/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHC) is a heterogeneous tumor. The hidden-genome classifier, a supervised machine learning-based algorithm, was used to quantify tumor heterogeneity and improve classification. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A retrospective review of 1,370 patients with IHC, extrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (EHC), gallbladder cancer (GBC), hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC), or biphenotypic tumors was conducted. A hidden-genome model classified 527 IHC based on genetic similarity to EHC/GBC or HCC. Genetic, histologic, and clinical data were correlated. RESULTS: In this study, 410 IHC (78%) had >50% genetic homology with EHC/GBC; 122 (23%) had >90% homology ("biliary class"), characterized by alterations of KRAS, SMAD4, and CDKN2A loss; 117 IHC (22%) had >50% genetic homology with HCC; and 30 (5.7%) had >90% homology ("HCC class"), characterized by TERT alterations. Patients with biliary- versus non-biliary-class IHC had median overall survival (OS) of 1 year (95% CI, 0.77, 1.5) versus 1.8 years (95% CI, 1.6, 2.0) for unresectable disease and 2.4 years (95% CI, 2.1, NR) versus 5.1 years (95% CI, 4.8, 6.9) for resectable disease. Large-duct IHC (n = 28) was more common in the biliary class (n = 27); the HCC class was composed mostly of small-duct IHC (64%, P = 0.02). The hidden genomic classifier predicted OS independent of FGFR2 and IDH1 alterations. By contrast, the histology subtype did not predict OS. CONCLUSIONS: IHC genetics form a spectrum with worse OS for tumors genetically aligned with EHC/GBC. The classifier proved superior to histologic subtypes for predicting OS independent of FGFR2 and IDH1 alterations. These results may explain the differential treatment responses seen in IHC and may direct therapy by helping stratify patients in future clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares , Colangiocarcinoma , Humanos , Colangiocarcinoma/genética , Colangiocarcinoma/patología , Colangiocarcinoma/mortalidad , Masculino , Femenino , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/genética , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/patología , Neoplasias de los Conductos Biliares/mortalidad , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Receptor Tipo 2 de Factor de Crecimiento de Fibroblastos/genética , Isocitrato Deshidrogenasa/genética , Biomarcadores de Tumor/genética , Adulto , Mutación , Pronóstico , Heterogeneidad Genética , Algoritmos , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aprendizaje Automático , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/genética , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/patología , Carcinoma Hepatocelular/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/genética , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/patología , Neoplasias de la Vesícula Biliar/mortalidad , Neoplasias Hepáticas/genética , Neoplasias Hepáticas/patología , Neoplasias Hepáticas/mortalidadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Perihilar cholangiocarcinoma, intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (IHCC), and gall bladder cancer are difficult malignancies to treat and are characterized by a tendency for local recurrence and a generally unfavorable prognosis. Surgical resection offers the only potential cure, conventionally performed via the open approach. Although minimally invasive approaches show promise, data remain limited. METHODS: With the institutional review board's approval, we prospectively followed 100 patients between 2013 and 2023 who underwent robotic surgical resection for perihilar, IHCC, and gallbladder cholangiocarcinoma. Data are presented as median (mean ± SD). Significance was accepted at P ≤ .05. RESULTS: The median patient age was 70 years, and the median operative duration was 333 min, with an estimated blood loss of 200 mL. Importantly, no unplanned conversions occurred, and only 1 intraoperative complication occurred within the IHCC cohort. The median length of stay was 4 days. There were a total of 19 postoperative complications and 19 readmissions within 30 days. Additionally, there were 3 in-hospital mortalities and 5 90-day mortalities. R0 resection was achieved in 87% of patients and R1 resection in 13%. At a median follow-up of 36 months, 62% of patients demonstrated disease-free survival, whereas 6% continued to live with the disease, and 32% did not survive. CONCLUSION: Our experience demonstrates the feasibility and safety of robotic resection for these complex malignancies, yielding promising short-term outcomes. Further investigation is required to ascertain the long-term oncologic outcomes.