RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Current clinical guidelines for management of diabetic peripheral neuropathy (DPN) emphasize good glycemic control. However, this has limited effect on prevention of DPN in type 2 diabetic (T2D) patients. This study investigates the effect of insulin treatment on development of DPN in a rat model of T2D to assess the underlying causes leading to DPN. METHODS: Twelve-week-old male Sprague-Dawley rats were allocated to a normal chow diet or a 45% kcal high-fat diet. After eight weeks, the high-fat fed animals received a mild dose of streptozotocin to induce hyperglycemia. Four weeks after diabetes induction, the diabetic animals were allocated into three treatment groups receiving either no insulin or insulin-releasing implants in a high or low dose. During the 12-week treatment period, blood glucose and body weight were monitored weekly, whereas Hargreaves' test was performed four, eight, and 12 weeks after treatment initiation. At study termination, several blood parameters, body composition, and neuropathy endpoints were assessed. RESULTS: Insulin treatment lowered blood glucose in a dose-dependent manner. In addition, both doses of insulin lowered lipids and increased body fat percentage. High-dose insulin treatment attenuated small nerve fiber damage assessed by Hargreaves' test and intraepidermal nerve fiber density compared to untreated diabetes and low-dose insulin; however, neuropathy was not completely prevented by tight glycemic control. Linear regression analysis revealed that glycemic status, circulating lipids, and sciatic nerve sorbitol level were all negatively associated with the small nerve fiber damage observed. CONCLUSION: In summary, our data suggest that high-dose insulin treatment attenuates small nerve fiber damage. Furthermore, data also indicate that both poor glycemic control and dyslipidemia are associated with disease progression. Consequently, this rat model of T2D seems to fit well with progression of DPN in humans and could be a relevant preclinical model to use in relation to research investigating treatment opportunities for DPN.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/tratamiento farmacológico , Neuropatías Diabéticas/prevención & control , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Neuropatía de Fibras Pequeñas/prevención & control , Animales , Glucemia/efectos de los fármacos , Glucemia/metabolismo , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Experimental/patología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/complicaciones , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/patología , Dieta Alta en Grasa , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Masculino , Fibras Nerviosas/efectos de los fármacos , Fibras Nerviosas/fisiología , Obesidad/complicaciones , Obesidad/tratamiento farmacológico , Obesidad/patología , Ratas , Ratas Sprague-Dawley , Nervio Ciático/efectos de los fármacos , Nervio Ciático/fisiologíaRESUMEN
Sensory defects associated with small-fiber neuropathy (SFN) can lead to profound disabilities. The relationship between the sensory nervous system and modulation of the renin-angiotensin system (RAS) has been described and focused on pain and neurodegeneration in several animal models. We have recently developed an experimental model of functional sensory neuropathy showing thermal hypoalgesia and neuropeptide depletion without nerve fiber degeneration. Here, we aimed to determine whether the modulation of angiotensin II (Ang II) activity could prevent sensory neuropathy induced by RTX. Control and RTX mice received ramipril, an Ang II converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitor, (0.5 mg/kg/day) or candesartan, an Ang II type 1 receptor (AT1R) blocker (0.5 mg/kg/day), one day before vehicle or RTX administration, and each day for the next seven days. Ramipril did not have a beneficial effect in RTX mice, whereas candesartan prevented thermal hypoalgesia and reduced neuropeptide depletion in intraepidermal nerve fibers and dorsal root ganglion neurons. The preventive effect of candesartan was not observed in mice deficient for the Ang II type 2 receptor (AT2R) and was counteracted in wild type mice by EMA200, an AT2R antagonist (3 mg/kg/day). Thus, candesartan may promote AT2R activation by blocking AT1R and increasing Ang II production and enhance its mechanisms of neuroprotection in our RTX model. Our finding that candesartan prevents nociception deficits and neuropeptide depletion encourages the evaluation of its therapeutic potential in patients presenting SFN, particularly those who experience chemotherapy-induced SFN.