Letter to the editor: "Beyond nimodipine: advanced neuroprotection strategies for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia".

This letter commends the article by Luzzi et al. on alternative neuroprotection strategies for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH). It highlights the pharmacological advantages of nicardipine, cilostazol, and clazosentan over nimodipine in managing cerebral vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia. Emphasizing the need for personalized medicine, it advocates for integrating genetic screening and advanced monitoring techniques to tailor treatments to individual patient profiles. This approach could significantly improve clinical outcomes by optimizing drug efficacy and minimizing adverse effects.

Evaluation of the Efficacy and Safety of Nicardipine Versus Clevidipine for Blood Pressure Control in Hypertensive Crisis.

BACKGROUND: Hypertensive crisis is an acute increase in blood pressure >180/120 mm Hg. A titratable antihypertensive agent is preferred to lower blood pressure acutely in a controlled way and prevent an abrupt overcorrection. Nicardipine and clevidipine are both dihydropyridine calcium channel blockers that provide unique benefits for blood pressure control. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to compare the efficacy and safety of nicardipine or clevidipine for blood pressure control in the setting of hypertensive crisis. METHODS: This was a single-center, retrospective cohort study. Eligible patients received either nicardipine or clevidipine for the treatment of hypertensive crisis. The primary outcome was achievement of 25% reduction in mean arterial pressure at 1 h. The secondary outcome was achievement of a systolic blood pressure (SBP) of <160 mm Hg at 2-6 h from the start of the infusion. RESULTS: This study included a total of 156 patients, 74 in the nicardipine group and 82 in the clevidipine group. The SBP on admission and at the start of the infusion were similar between groups. There was no difference between groups in achieving a 25% reduction in mean arterial pressure at 1 h. Nicardipine achieved an SBP goal of <160 mm Hg at 2-6 h significantly more often than the clevidipine group (89.2% vs. 73.2%; p = 0.011). CONCLUSIONS: There is no difference between agents for initial blood pressure control in the treatment of hypertensive crisis. Nicardipine showed more sustained SBP control, with a lower risk of rebound hypertension and a significant cost savings compared with clevidipine.

Nicardipine-chitosan nanoparticles alleviate thioacetamide-induced acute liver injury by targeting NFκB/NLRP3/IL-1ß signaling in rats: Unraveling new roles beyond calcium channel blocking.

Liver inflammatory diseases are marked by serious complications. Notably, nicardipine (NCD) has demonstrated anti-inflammatory properties, but its benefits in liver inflammation have not been studied yet. However, the therapeutic efficacy of NCD is limited by its short half-life and low bioavailability. Therefore, we aimed to evaluate the potential of NCD-loaded chitosan nanoparticles (ChNPs) to improve its pharmacokinetic profile and hepatic accumulation. Four formulations of NCD-ChNPs were synthesized and characterized. The optimal formulation (NP2) exhibited a mean particle diameter of 172.6 ± 1.94 nm, a surface charge of +25.66 ± 0.93 mV, and an encapsulation efficiency of 88.86 ± 1.17 %. NP2 showed good physical stability as a lyophilized powder over three months. It displayed pH-sensitive release characteristics, releasing 77.15 ± 5.09 % of NCD at pH 6 (mimicking the inflammatory microenvironment) and 52.15 ± 3.65 % at pH 7.4, indicating targeted release in inflamed liver tissues. Pharmacokinetic and biodistribution studies revealed that NCD-ChNPs significantly prolonged NCD circulation time and enhanced its concentration in liver tissues compared to plain NCD. Additionally, the study investigated the protective effects of NCD-ChNPs in thioacetamide-induced liver injury in rats by modulating the NFκB/NLRP3/IL-1ß signaling axis. NCD-ChNPs effectively inhibited NFκB activation, reduced NLRP3 inflammasome activation, and subsequent release of IL-1ß, which correlated with improved hepatic function and reduced inflammation and oxidative stress. These findings highlight the potential of NCD-ChNPs as a promising nanomedicine strategy for the treatment of liver inflammatory diseases, warranting further investigation into their clinical applications, particularly in hypertensive patients with liver inflammatory conditions.

Beyond nimodipine: advanced neuroprotection strategies for aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia.

The clinical management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (SAH)-associated vasospasm remains a challenge in neurosurgical practice, with its prevention and treatment having a major impact on neurological outcome. While considered a mainstay, nimodipine is burdened by some non-negligible limitations that make it still a suboptimal candidate of pharmacotherapy for SAH. This narrative review aims to provide an update on the pharmacodynamics, pharmacokinetics, overall evidence, and strength of recommendation of nimodipine alternative drugs for aneurysmal SAH-associated vasospasm and delayed cerebral ischemia. A PRISMA literature search was performed in the PubMed/Medline, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, and PubChem databases using a combination of the MeSH terms "medical therapy," "management," "cerebral vasospasm," "subarachnoid hemorrhage," and "delayed cerebral ischemia." Collected articles were reviewed for typology and relevance prior to final inclusion. A total of 346 articles were initially collected. The identification, screening, eligibility, and inclusion process resulted in the selection of 59 studies. Nicardipine and cilostazol, which have longer half-lives than nimodipine, had robust evidence of efficacy and safety. Eicosapentaenoic acid, dapsone and clazosentan showed a good balance between effectiveness and favorable pharmacokinetics. Combinations between different drug classes have been studied to a very limited extent. Nicardipine, cilostazol, Rho-kinase inhibitors, and clazosentan proved their better pharmacokinetic profiles compared with nimodipine without prejudice with effective and safe neuroprotective role. However, the number of trials conducted is significantly lower than for nimodipine. Aneurysmal SAH-associated vasospasm remains an area of ongoing preclinical and clinical research where the search for new drugs or associations is critical.

Anti-hypertensive therapy for preeclampsia: a network meta-analysis and systematic review.

BACKGROUND: Preeclampsia (PE) is a pregnancy disorder that represents a major cause of maternal and perinatal morbidity and mortality. METHODS: This network meta-analysis was registered with PROSPERO. We searched the PubMed, ClinicalTrials.gov. and Embase databases for studies published from inception to the 31st of March 2023. RevMan5.3 software provided by the Cochrane Collaboration was used for direct meta-analysis (DMA) statistical analysis. Funnel maps, network meta-analysis (NMA), the surface under the cumulative ranking curve (SUCRA) to rank the different interventions and publication bias were generated by STATA 17.0 software. RESULTS: We included eight randomized controlled trials (RCTs) involving a total of 1192 women with PE; two studies were of high quality and six were of moderate quality. Eight interventions were addressed in the NMA. In the DMA, we found that blood pressure in the Ketanserin group were significantly higher than those in the Nicardipine group. NMA showed that blood pressure in the Dihydralazine group was significantly higher than that in the Methyldopa, Labetalol, Nicardipine and Diltiazem groups. And the blood pressure in the Labetalol group was significantly lower than that in the Nicardipine group. SUCRA values showed that Diltiazem was more effective in lowering blood pressure than other drugs looked at in this study. CONCLUSION: According to the eight RCTs included in this study, Diltiazem was the most effective in reducing blood pressure in PE patients; Labetalol and Nicardipine also had good effects. Diltiazem is preferred for the treatment of patients with severe PE and high blood pressure.

Nicardipine or Nitroprusside for Postoperative Blood Pressure Control in Infants After Surgery for Congenital Heart Disease: Single-Center Retrospective Noninferiority and Cost Analysis, 2016-2020.

OBJECTIVES: Postoperative hypertension frequently occurs after surgery for congenital heart disease. Given safety concerns when using calcium channel blockers in infants along with the cost and side-effect profile of nitroprusside, we retrospectively assessed our experience of using nicardipine and nitroprusside for postoperative blood pressure control in infants who underwent surgery for congenital heart disease. We also investigated the cost difference between the medications. DESIGN: This study was a single-center retrospective, pre-post chart review of patients who had surgery for congenital heart disease between 2016 and 2020. The primary aim was a noninferiority comparison of achievement of blood pressure goal at 1-hour post-initiation of an antihypertensive agent. Secondary comparisons included achievement of blood pressure goal at 2 hours after medication initiation, Vasoactive-Inotropic Score (VIS), and blood transfusion, crystalloid volume, and calcium needs. SETTING: Academic quaternary-care center. PATIENTS: Infants under 1 year old who required treatment for hypertension with nitroprusside ( n = 71) or nicardipine ( n = 52) within 24 hours of surgery for congenital heart disease. INTERVENTIONS: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: We failed to identify any difference in proportion of patients that achieved blood pressure control at 1-hour after medication initiation (nitroprusside 52% vs. nicardipine 54%; p = 0.86), with nicardipine noninferior to nitroprusside within a 15% margin. Of patients who did not achieve control at 1-hour post-medication initiation, receiving nicardipine was associated with blood pressure control at 2 hours post-medication initiation (79% vs. 38%; p = 0.003). We also failed to identify an association between antihypertensive types and mean VIS scores, blood transfusion volumes, crystalloid volumes, and quantities of calcium administered. Index cost of using nitroprusside was 16 times higher than using nicardipine, primarily due to difference in wholesale cost. CONCLUSIONS: In our experience of achieving blood pressure control in infants after surgery for congenital heart disease (2016-2020), antihypertensive treatment with nicardipine was noninferior to nitroprusside. Furthermore, nicardipine use was significantly less expensive than nitroprusside. Our contemporary practice is therefore to use nicardipine in preference to nitroprusside.

Transdermal application of H100 gel to the penile shaft in patients with Peyronie's disease infiltrates the tunica albuginea.

Treatment options for Peyronie's disease (PD) remain limited. Topical H100 gel, (Hybrid Medical, Edina, USA), which contains nicardipine, super oxide dismutase and emu oil showed safety and efficacy in a previous small double-blind placebo-controlled pilot study. The present study evaluates if topically applied H100 gel applied to the penile shaft infiltrates the tunica albuginea. Nicardipine is a key active ingredient in H100 and serves as a surrogate marker. Three men already scheduled to undergo a planned surgical procedure for PD applied commercially available H100 gel twice daily to the penile shaft for up to 30 days prior to the procedure. Tunica albuginea samples were obtained at surgery. Nicardipine evaluation was performed using isotope dilution technique via liquid-chromatograph-mass spectrometry (LCMS). All three patients tolerated H100 gel application without side effects. All three tunica albuginea specimens showed detectable nicardipine in the tunical tissue. Transdermal application of commercially available H100 gel is able to penetrate the tunica albuginea tissue and is detectable in men with acute and chronic PD. This finding may support the encouraging results found in the prior H100 pilot study.

Utility of nicardipine in the management of hypertensive crises in adults with reduced ejection fractions.

BACKGROUND: Nicardipine is commonly used in the management of hypertensive crises, except those involving cardiac contractility defects despite its ability to reduce afterload and pulmonary congestion. Consequently, there is limited literature evaluating nicardipine's role for this indication. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the efficacy and safety of nicardipine in adults with reduced ejection fractions presenting with acute heart failure with hypertension (AHF-H). METHODS: This was a retrospective study conducted at an academic Level 1 trauma center with an annual Emergency Department (ED) volume surpassing 100,000. The purpose of this study was to determine the efficacy and safety of nicardipine in adults with reduced ejection fractions presenting to the ED with AHF-H. Efficacy was determined by achievement of the physician prescribed blood pressure target range. The primary safety endpoints included the number of individuals who experienced bradycardia (< 60 beats per minute, bpm) or hypotension (systolic blood pressure, SBP, < 90 mmHg) while receiving nicardipine and for up to 15 min after its discontinuation. Patients were included if they were ≥ 18 years of age, received a continuous intravenous nicardipine infusion within six hours of presenting to the ED, and had an ejection fraction ≤ 40% per an echocardiogram obtained within three months of the study visit. Pregnant and incarcerated patients were excluded. RESULTS: Of the 500 patient charts reviewed, 38 met inclusion criteria. The median (interquartile, IQR) ejection fraction and brain natriuretic peptide (BNP) were 35% (25-40) and 731 pg/nL (418-3277), respectively. The median baseline heart rate and SBP were 90 bpm and 193 mmHg, respectively. The median physician specified SBP goal was 160 mmHg and all patients met this endpoint in a median time of 18 min. One (2.6%) patient in the total population developed both hypotension and bradycardia. This patient had an ejection fraction of 20%, was intubated, and received nicardipine in addition to esmolol for an aortic dissection without experiencing an adverse event until 30 min after dexmedetomidine was initiated. CONCLUSION: In this non-interventional study evaluating the use of nicardipine in patients with reduced ejection fractions presenting to the ED with AHF-H, nicardipine was found to be safe and effective. To our knowledge this is the largest study to date evaluating nicardipine in this patient population and positively contributes to the existing literature.

Hypertensive Emergency: Parenteral Antihypertensives and Population Data.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Review parenteral therapeutic choices in treatment of hypertensive crises by mechanism of action and summarize recent literature on the management of hypertensive crises. RECENT FINDINGS: Recent data have documented the safety and efficacy of labetalol and nicardipine in treatment of hypertensive crises as well as characterized the hypertensive emergency population to a much greater extent. Based on recent data, hypertensive emergencies are seen in 0.5% of all emergency room visits. Ischemic stroke and heart failure/pulmonary edema are the most common forms of organ damage seen in hypertensive emergencies. There are many therapeutic choices in treatment of hypertensive crises with varied mechanisms of action. Large randomized, controlled trial evidence is lacking in this therapeutic area; however, recent data have documented the safety and efficacy of labetalol and nicardipine.

Nicardipine is a putative EED inhibitor and has high selectivity and potency against chemoresistant prostate cancer in preclinical models.

BACKGROUND: It is imperative to develop novel therapeutics to overcome chemoresistance, a significant obstacle in the clinical management of prostate cancer (PCa) and other cancers. METHODS: A phenotypic screen was performed to identify novel inhibitors of chemoresistant PCa cells. The mechanism of action of potential candidate(s) was investigated using in silico docking, and molecular and cellular assays in chemoresistant PCa cells. The in vivo efficacy was evaluated in mouse xenograft models of chemoresistant PCa. RESULTS: Nicardipine exhibited high selectivity and potency against chemoresistant PCa cells via inducing apoptosis and cell cycle arrest. Computational, molecular, and cellular studies identified nicardipine as a putative inhibitor of embryonic ectoderm development (EED) protein, and the results are consistent with a proposed mechanism of action that nicardipine destabilised enhancer of zeste homologue 2 (EZH2) and inhibited key components of noncanonical EZH2 signalling, including transducer and activator of transcription 3, S-phase kinase-associated protein 2, ATP binding cassette B1, and survivin. As a monotherapy, nicardipine effectively inhibited the skeletal growth of chemoresistant C4-2B-TaxR tumours. As a combination regimen, nicardipine synergistically enhanced the in vivo efficacy of docetaxel against C4-2 xenografts. CONCLUSION: Our findings provided the first preclinical evidence supporting nicardipine as a novel EED inhibitor that has the potential to be promptly tested in PCa patients to overcome chemoresistance and improve clinical outcomes.

Therapeutic and safety outcomes of intracoronary nicardipine in coronary artery disease patients: a systematic review.

Aim: This systematic review aimed to shed light on the efficacy of intracoronary (IC) nicardipine in treating no reflow with CAD undergoing revascularization. Methods: Literature search was performed on databases with following eligibility criteria: adult patients with CAD; clinical trials or observational studies; IC nicardipine as intervention; therapeutic and safety outcome reported. Results: A total of 1249 papers were yielded during the literature search. Of these, 11 studies were finalized for this systematic review. Complete restoration of TIMI 3 flow was observed in 98.6% of the patients receiving IC nicardipine. A significant increase in the CBF after infusion of IC nicardipine (p < 0.05) was also observed. Conclusion: IC nicardipine significantly increases CBF and decreases coronary vascular resistance.

Coronary artery disease (CAD) is a condition that results in the narrowing or blockage of heart arteries. Arteries are blood vessels that bring oxygen-rich blood from your heart to the rest of your body's cells. We aimed to evaluate the effects of intracoronary (IC) nicardipine, a drug that blocks calcium from entering the muscle cells and blood vessels of the heart, which causes the vessels to relax and widen, allowing for blood to flow more easily, on a phenomenon known as coronary slow flow (CSF). CSF is defined as a delayed widening of the blood vessels of the heart. CSF or the no reflow phenomenon is a major negative complication associated with surgical procedures such as percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) or coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG), both of which are used to open up blocked arteries. The systematic search identified studies that evaluated the effect of IC nicardipine in patient during CAD treatment, undergoing PCI, CABG, or having confirmed or suspected narrowing of the aortic valve or one of the four valves of the heart, which results in restricted blood flow from the heart to the body. From the results of studies discussed in the review, it can be concluded that IC nicardipine significantly increases blood flow to the heart and can help prevent the no reflow phenomenon in patients undergoing PCI. Nicardipine proved to be a safe and effective option in the management of complications such as no reflow in patients receiving therapies to restore blood flow following CAD.

Comparison between clevidipine and nicardipine in cerebrovascular diseases: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

PURPOSE: The term "cerebrovascular diseases (CVDs)" refers to a broad category of diseases that affect the brain's blood vessels and cerebral circulation. Controlling acute hypertension (HTN) by antihypertensive drugs such as clevidipine and nicardipine can be a highly efficient method of lowering the incidence of CVDs. METHODS: This is a systematic review and meta-analysis study. The PubMed, Scopus, and Web of Science online databases and a gray literature search were performed to identify potentially eligible studies. The included studies were observational studies that compared adult patients receiving clevidipine or nicardipine for controlling HTN in the setting of CVD. RESULTS: We reviewed 5 final included articles, including 546 patients. The pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) for time to goal SBP was - 0.04 (95 % CI: [-0.66; 0.58], p-value: 0.86, I2: 79.0 %, pooled MD: -12.90 min), meaning that the clevidipine group had a shorter time to goal systolic blood pressure (SBP) than the nicardipine group. The pooled SMD for total volume infusion was - 0.52 (95 % CI: [-0.93; -0.12], p-value: 0.03, I2: 0.0 %, pooled MD: -1118.81 mL), showing a notably lower total volume infused into patients in the clevidipine group. CONCLUSIONS: We found that clevidipine reaches the SBP goal faster than nicardipine; however, there was no statistically significant difference between the two drugs. The total volume infused to achieve the goal SBP was significantly lower in the clevidipine group. Further prospective studies are needed to compare clevidipine and nicardipine in CVD patients on a large scale.

Comparative Study of Clevidipine to Nicardipine for Perioperative Hypertension in Patients Undergoing Cardiac Surgery.

Objective: The primary objective of this study was to compare the efficacy of clevidipine to nicardipine in the treatment of perioperative acute hypertension in patients undergoing cardiac surgery. Methods: This was a single-center retrospective study which included patients who received either clevidipine or nicardipine. Patients were followed for the duration of study drug infusion or for a maximum of 48 hours. Outcomes assessed included the percent of time spent within patient specific goal blood pressure, incidence of hypertensive events per patient, safety outcomes, and cost of medication treatment. Results: There were 201 cardiac surgeries performed between August 2018-January 2019 and July 2019-February 2020. Sixty-seven patients met our inclusion criteria of receiving either clevidipine (n = 29) or nicardipine (n = 38). The median percent of time spent within goal blood pressure range for clevidipine was 55.2% compared to 36.4% for nicardipine treatment (P = .036). The median number of hypertensive episodes per patient was 3 for clevidipine and 2 for nicardipine (P = .211). There were no identified differences in safety outcomes such as hypotension, vasopressor use, serum creatinine elevation, tachycardia, and atrial fibrillation. The median cost of treatment required for the observed 48-hour period with clevidipine was $128.58 compared to $55.74 for nicardipine (P < .001). Conclusion: Our findings suggest that patients undergoing cardiac surgery on clevidipine had better perioperative blood pressure control compared to nicardipine, with a negligible increase in cost, and no observed difference in safety.

Nicardipine versus Labetalol for Hypertension during Acute Stroke: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Background and Objective: Current recommendations prescribe either nicardipine or labetalol as the first-line treatment for acute hypertension due to ease of use, availability, and low price. However, it is unclear if these drugs have different effectiveness and safety profiles. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to compare the efficacy and safety of labetalol and nicardipine in patients with acute stroke. Materials and Methods: MEDLINE via PubMed, Scopus, Embase, and Google Scholar databases were electronically searched for the eligible publications from inception until March 2022. All full-text journal papers in English which compared the efficacy of nicardipine with that of labetalol on lowering blood pressure (BP; or treating hypertension) in all subtypes of acute stroke were included. The Cochrane Collaboration tool was used to assess the risk of bias. Data were analyzed using specific statistical methods. Results: Following the abstract and full-text screening, this meta-analysis included five retrospective cohorts and one prospective pseudorandomized cohort. Nicardipine's effect on time at goal BP was significantly superior to that of labetalol in patients with acute stroke (0.275 standardized mean difference [SMD], 95% confidence interval [CI]: 0.112-0.438, P = 0.001). The incidence of adverse events was significantly higher in the nicardipine group than that in the labetalol group. The pooled odds ratio (OR) was 1.509 (95% CI: 1.077-2.113, I2 = 0.00%, P = 0.757). The quality of included studies was found to be low. Conclusion: More prospective, comparative trials are needed to investigate the efficacy of BP management as well as clinical outcomes in acute stroke patients receiving continuous labetalol and nicardipine infusions.

Brain Oxygen-Directed Management of Aneurysmal Subarachnoid Hemorrhage. Temporal Patterns of Cerebral Ischemia During Acute Brain Attack, Early Brain Injury, and Territorial Sonographic Vasospasm.

BACKGROUND: Neurocritical management of aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage focuses on delayed cerebral ischemia (DCI) after aneurysm repair. METHODS: This study conceptualizes the pathophysiology of cerebral ischemia and its management using a brain oxygen-directed protocol (intracranial pressure [ICP] control, eubaric hyperoxia, hemodynamic therapy, arterial vasodilation, and neuroprotection) in patients with subarachnoid hemorrhage, undergoing aneurysm clipping (n = 40). RESULTS: The brain oxygen-directed protocol reduced Lbo2 (Pbto2 [partial pressure of brain tissue oxygen] <20 mm Hg) from 67% to 15% during acute brain attack (<24 hours of ictus), by increasing Pbto2 from 11.31 ± 9.34 to 27.85 ± 6.76 (P < 0.0001) and then to 29.09 ± 17.88 within 72 hours. Day-after-bleed, Fio2 change, ICP, hemoglobin, and oxygen saturation were predictors for Pbto2 during early brain injury. Transcranial Doppler ultrasonography velocities (>20 cm/second) increased at day 2. During DCI caused by territorial sonographic vasospasm (TSV), middle cerebral artery mean velocity (Vm) increased from 45.00 ± 15.12 to 80.37 ± 38.33/second by day 4 with concomitant Pbto2 reduction from 29.09 ± 17.88 to 22.66 ± 8.19. Peak TSV (days 7-12) coincided with decline in Pbto2. Nicardipine mitigated Lbo2 during peak TSV, in contrast to nimodipine, with survival benefit (P < 0.01). Intravenous and cisternal nicardipine combination had survival benefit (Cramer Φ = 0.43 and 0.327; G2 = 28.32; P < 0.001). This study identifies 4 zones of Lbo2 during survival benefit (Cramer Φ = 0.43 and 0.3) TSV, uncompensated; global cerebral ischemia, compensated, and normal Pbto2. Admission Glasgow Coma Scale score (not increased ICP) was predictive of low Pbto2 (ß = 0.812, R2 = 0.661, F1,30 = 58.41; P < 0.0001) during early brain injury. Coma was the only credible predictor for mortality (odds ratio, 7.33/>4.8∗; χ2 = 7.556; confidence interval, 1.70-31.54; P < 0.01) followed by basilar aneurysm, poor grade, high ICP and Lbo2 during TSV. Global cerebral ischemia occurs immediately after the ictus, persisting in 30% of patients despite the high therapeutic intensity level, superimposed by DCI during TSV. CONCLUSIONS: We propose implications for clinical practice and patient management to minimize cerebral ischemia.

Nicardipine for treating severe antepartum hypertension during pregnancy: Nine years of experience in more than 800 women.

INTRODUCTION: Women with severe hypertension during pregnancy require prompt stabilization with a combination of magnesium sulfate and rapidly acting intravenously administered antihypertensives. It remains unknown which antihypertensive is best suited for pregnancy. The present study evaluated the intravenous use of the calcium antagonist, nicardipine. MATERIAL AND METHODS: This multicenter, retrospective case series included all pregnant women beyond 20 weeks of gestation with severe antepartum hypertension that were treated with intravenous nicardipine. PRIMARY OUTCOME MEASURES: successful treatment, time to successful treatment, and maternal safety. Severe hypertension was defined as systolic blood pressure (SBP) of 160 mm Hg or more and/or diastolic blood pressure (DBP) of 110 mm Hg or more. RESULTS: This study included 830 women. After 1 h of treatment, two-thirds of the women had SBP below 160 mm Hg and DBP below 100 mm Hg. In three out of four women, the mean arterial pressure was below 120 mm Hg. Within 2 h of treatment, 77.4% of women achieved successful treatment. In all cases, nicardipine was eventually effective. Within the first 2 h, 42.7% of women experienced temporary low DBP (ie below 70 mm Hg) without clinical consequences for the mother or fetus. In all cases, the low DBP resolved after discontinuing or reducing the dosage of nicardipine. One case of fetal distress was attributable to maternal hypotension, and a cesarean section was performed at more than 2 h after initiating therapy. During treatment, headache, nausea, and vomiting decreased significantly. CONCLUSIONS: To date, this was the largest case-series study on the use of nicardipine for treating severe antepartum hypertension in pregnancy. We found that nicardipine could effectively and safely treat this condition. Based on its high success rate and acceptable safety profile, nicardipine should be considered a first-line treatment in women with severe hypertension in pregnancy.

Early Hyperchloremia is Independently Associated with Death or Disability in Patients with Intracerebral Hemorrhage.

BACKGROUND: On the basis of increased mortality associated with hyperchloremia among critically ill patients, we investigated the effect of occurrence of early hyperchloremia on death or disability at 90 days in patients with intracerebral hemorrhage (ICH). METHODS: We analyzed the data from Antihypertensive Treatment of Cerebral Hemorrhage 2 trial, which recruited patients with spontaneous ICH within 4.5 h of symptom onset. Patients with increased serum chloride levels (110 mmol/L or greater) at either baseline or 24, 48, or 72 h after randomization were identified. We further graded hyperchloremia into one occurrence or two or more occurrences within the first 72 h. Two logistic regression analyses were performed to determine the effects of hyperchloremia on (1) death within 90 days and (2) death or disability at 90 days after adjustment for potential confounders. RESULTS: Among the total of 1,000 patients analyzed, hyperchloremia within 72 h was seen in 114 patients with one occurrence and in 154 patients with two or more occurrences. Patients with one occurrence of hyperchloremia (odds ratio [OR] 2.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.1-5.5) and those with two or more occurrences (OR 2.6, 95% CI 1.3-5.0) had significantly higher odds of death within 90 days after adjustment for age, race and ethnicity, National Institutes of Health Stroke Scale score strata, hematoma volume, presence or absence of intraventricular hemorrhage, cigarette smoking, previous stroke, and maximum hourly dose of nicardipine. Patients with two or more occurrences of hyperchloremia (OR 3.4, 95% CI 2.1-5.6) had significantly higher odds of death or disability at 90 days compared with patients without hyperchloremia after adjustment for the abovementioned potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: The independent association between hyperchloremia and death or disability at 90 days suggests that avoidance of hyperchloremia may reduce the observed death or disability in patients with ICH. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT01176565.

Comparative Study of Vasodilatation After Intra-arterial Nicardipine or Dantrolene Infusion in Animal Model of Cerebral Vasospasm.

PURPOSE: Intra-arterial (IA) infusion of calcium channel blockers (CCBs) has been widely applied in treating medically refractory vasospasm; however, surprisingly little is known regarding their vasodilatory duration. This study was undertaken to compare attributes of nicardipine and dantrolene, focusing on efficacy and capacity for sustained vasodilation. METHODS: In New Zealand white rabbits (N = 22), vasospasm was individually provoked through experimentally induced subarachnoid hemorrhage and confirmed via conventional angiography, grouping animals by IA-infused drug (nicardipine vs. dantrolene). Controls received normal saline. After chemoangioplasty, follow-up angiography was performed at intervals of 1-3 h for 6 h to compare vasospastic and dilated (i.e., treated) arterial diameters. Drug efficacy, duration of action, and changes in mean arterial pressure (relative to baseline) were analyzed by group. RESULTS: Compared with controls, effective vasodilation was evident in both nicardipine and dantrolene test groups after IA infusion. Vasodilatory effects of nicardipine peaked at 1 h, returning to former vasospastic states at 3 h. In dantrolene recipients, vasodilation endured longer, lasting >6 h. Only the nicardipine group showed a significant 3­h period of lowered blood pressure. CONCLUSION: Unlike the vasodilatory action of a CCB, sustained for < 3 h after IA infusion, the effect of dantrolene endured for > 6 h. This outcome suggests that IA dantrolene infused alone or together with a conventional CCB infusion may be a new means of prolonging vasodilatory effect. Further research is needed to assess durations of IA-infused vasodilatory drug based on perfusion status.