Experience sharing of a case of dual atrioventricular nodal non-reentrant tachycardia: Case report.

RATIONALE: Tachycardia is a common arrhythmia in clinical practice, and its pathogenesis is mostly related to reentry. However, there are also a few tachycardia that are not related to reentry. Actively clarifying the pathogenesis of these non-reentry related tachycardia is of great significance for its treatment. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 55-year-old female patient presented with recurrent palpitations with a fastest heart rate of 180 beats/minute 10 years ago. DIAGNOSIS: Dual atrioventricular nodal non-reentrant tachycardia (DAVNNT). INTERVENTIONS: DAVNNT can be cured by radiofrequency ablation of atrioventricular nodal slow path modification. OUTCOMES: The tachycardia has stopped. CONCLUSION: DAVNNT is a rare disease in clinical practice. Its characteristic is not reentration-related arrhythmias, but the phenomenon of increased heart rate caused by electrical conduction down the double pathway of atrioventricular nodal tract and subsequent pathway. Electrophysiological examination helps to clarify the diagnosis and pathogenesis, and catheter ablation can cure the disease.

Procedural and Intermediate-term Results of the Electroanatomical-guided Cardioneuroablation for the Treatment of Supra-Hisian Second- or Advanced-degree Atrioventricular Block: the PIRECNA multicentre registry.

AIMS: Prior case series showed promising results for cardioneuroablation in patients with vagally induced atrioventricular blocks (VAVBs). We aimed to examine the acute procedural characteristics and intermediate-term outcomes of electroanatomical-guided cardioneuroablation (EACNA) in patients with VAVB. METHODS AND RESULTS: This international multicentre retrospective registry included data collected from 20 centres. Patients presenting with symptomatic paroxysmal or persistent VAVB were included in the study. All patients underwent EACNA. Procedural success was defined by the acute reversal of atrioventricular blocks (AVBs) and complete abolition of atropine response. The primary outcome was occurrence of syncope and daytime second- or advanced-degree AVB on serial prolonged electrocardiogram monitoring during follow-up. A total of 130 patients underwent EACNA. Acute procedural success was achieved in 96.2% of the cases. During a median follow-up of 300 days (150, 496), the primary outcome occurred in 17/125 (14%) cases with acute procedural success (recurrence of AVB in 9 and new syncope in 8 cases). Operator experience and use of extracardiac vagal stimulation were similar for patients with and without primary outcomes. A history of atrial fibrillation, hypertension, and coronary artery disease was associated with a higher primary outcome occurrence. Only four patients with primary outcome required pacemaker placement during follow-up. CONCLUSION: This is the largest multicentre study demonstrating the feasibility of EACNA with encouraging intermediate-term outcomes in selected patients with VAVB. Studies investigating the effect on burden of daytime symptoms caused by the AVB are required to confirm these findings.

His bundle pacing versus left bundle branch area pacing in patients undergoing atrioventricular node ablation: A prospective and comparative study.

BACKGROUND: Pacemaker implantation combined with atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) is a well-established strategy for uncontrolled atrial arrhythmias. Limited data are available regarding His bundle pacing (HBP) and left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) in this setting. AIM: To compare the outcomes of HBP and LBBAP in patients undergoing pacemaker implantation combined with AVN in routine clinical practice. METHODS: We prospectively included all patients who underwent AVNA after successful conduction system pacing (CSP) in two hospitals between September 2017 and May 2023. The primary outcome was the 1-year composite of first episode of heart failure hospitalization, symptomatic atrioventricular node reconduction requiring a second AVNA procedure, lead revision or death from any cause. RESULTS: A total of 164 patients underwent AVNA following successful CSP (68 HBP and 96 LBBAP). Mean pacemaker implantation and AVNA procedure times were shorter in the LBBAP group than the HBP group (46±18 vs 59±23min; P<0.001 and 31±12 vs 43±22min, respectively; P<0.001). Complete atrioventricular block was more frequently obtained in the LBBAP group (88/96 patients [92%] vs 54/68 patients [79%]; P=0.04). One-year freedom from the composite outcome was more frequent in the LBBAP group (89.7% vs 72.9%; hazard ratio 0.32, 95% confidence interval 0.14-0.72; P=0.01). The strategy was similarly effective in both groups with a significant improvement in NYHA class and left ventricular ejection fraction. A secondary pacing threshold elevation >1V occurred only in the HBP group (11%). CONCLUSION: In this prospective, comparative study, LBBAP provided better 1-year outcomes than HBP.

Outcomes of combined left bundle branch area pacing with atrioventricular nodal ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation and pulmonary disease.

INTRODUCTION: Concomitant left bundle branch area pacing (LBBAP) with atrioventricular (AV) nodal ablation is emerging as a viable management option in atrial fibrillation refractory to medical management. Its viability in patients with pulmonary disease and atrial fibrillation is unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: This is a retrospective, observational cohort study in consecutive patients who underwent concomitant LBBAP with AV nodal ablation with advanced pulmonary disease at the Cleveland Clinic Fairview Hospital between January 2019 and January 2023. Patient characteristics, comorbidities, and medication use were extracted via chart review. Rates of hospitalizations, medication use, and structural disease seen on echocardiography were compared before and after the procedure. There were 27 patients with group 3 pulmonary hypertension who underwent the procedure. In the 24 months preprocedure, there were 114 admissions for heart failure or atrial fibrillation compared to 9 admissions postprocedure (p < .001). Mean follow up was 17.3 ± 12.1 months. There were no significant complications or lead dislodgements. Echocardiographic characteristics were similar prior to and after pacemaker implantation. Use of medications for rate and rhythm control was common preprocedure, and was reduced dramatically postprocedure. CONCLUSION: This small, retrospective cohort study suggests concomitant LBBAP with AV nodal ablation may be safe and efficacious for management of atrial fibrillation in patients with advanced pulmonary disease.

Nonpharmacologic rate control of postoperative atrial fibrillation in the canine sterile pericarditis model.

INTRODUCTION: Postoperative atrial fibrillation (POAF) is common following open heart surgery, and is associated with significant morbidity. Medications used for ventricular rate control of POAF may not be effective in controlling rapid ventricular rates during the postoperative period because of increased sympathetic tone. The purpose of this study was to develop nonpharmacologic rate control of POAF by atrioventricular node (AVN) fat pad stimulation using clinically available temporary pacing wires in the canine sterile pericarditis model. METHODS: We studied 10 sterile pericarditis dogs in the closed-chest state on postoperative days 1-3. The AVN fat pad stimulation (amplitude 2-15 mA; frequency 20 Hz; pulse width 0.03-0.2 ms) was performed during sustained POAF (>5 min). We measured ventricular rate and inefficient ventricular contractions during sustained POAF and compared it with and without AVN fat pad stimulation. Also, the parameters of AVN fat pad stimulation to achieve a rate control of POAF were measured over the postoperative days. RESULTS: Eleven episodes of sustained POAF were induced in 5/10 sterile pericarditis dogs in the closed-chest state on postoperative days 1-2. During POAF, the AVN fat pad stimulation decreased the ventricular rate from 178 ± 52 bpm to 100 ± 8 bpm in nine episodes. Nonpharmacologic rate control therapy successfully controlled the ventricular rate and eliminated inefficient ventricular contractions during POAF for the duration of the AVN fat pad stimulation. The AVN fat pad stimulation output remained relatively stable over the postoperative days. CONCLUSION: During sustained POAF, nonpharmacologic rate control by AVN fat pad stimulation effectively and safely controlled rapid ventricular rates throughout the postoperative period.

Impact on nurse workload and patient satisfaction of atrioventricular junction ablation performed simultaneously with conduction system pacing using a superior approach from the pocket compared with the conventional femoral approach.

AIMS: Conduction system pacing (CSP) and atrioventricular junction ablation (AVJA) improve outcomes in patients with symptomatic, refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). Superior approach (SA) from the pocket, via the axillary or subclavian vein, has been recently proposed as an alternative to the conventional femoral access (FA) to perform AVJA. In this study, we compare the impact of these alternative approaches on nurse workload (NWL) and patient satisfaction. METHODS AND RESULTS: This was a prospective, observational study enrolling consecutive patients undergoing simultaneous CSP and AVJA. Electrophysiology laboratory (EP Lab) NWL was calculated by using a self-developed model. Ward NWL was calculated using the MIDENF® validated scale. Patient satisfaction was collected using the Hospital Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Provider Systems questionnaire. A total of 119 patients were enrolled: in 50, AVJA was primarily attempted with SA, and in 69 with FA. Compared with FA, SA was associated with a lower EP Lab NWL (169.8 ± 26.7 vs. 202.7 ± 38.9 min; P < 0.001) and a lower Ward NWL (474.5 ± 184.8 vs. 808.6 ± 289.9 min; P < 0.001). Multivariate analysis identified SA as an independent predictor of lower EP Lab NWL [hazard ratio (HR) 4.60; P = 0.001] and of lower Ward NWL (HR 45.13; P < 0.001). Compared with FA, SA was associated with a higher patient-reported rating regarding their experience during hospital stay (P = 0.035) and the overall hospital evaluation (P = 0.026). CONCLUSION: In patients undergoing simultaneous CSP and AVJA, the use of an SA for ablation is a valid alternative to conventional FA. Compared with FA, this approach significantly reduces NWL and is associated with greater patient satisfaction. REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT03612635.

Voltage and propagation mapping: New tools to improve successful ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia.

INTRODUCTION: Mapping system is useful in ablation of atrioventricular nodal reentry tachycardia (AVNRT) and localization of anatomic variances. Voltage mapping identifies a low voltage area in the Koch triangle called low-voltage-bridge (LVB); propagation mapping identifies the collision point (CP) of atrial wavefront convergence. We conducted a prospective study to evaluate the relationship between LVB and CP with successful site of ablation and identify standard value for LVB. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Three-dimensional (3D) maps of the right atria were constructed from intracardiac recordings using the ablation catheter. Cut-off values on voltage map were adjusted until LVB was observed. On propagation map, atrial wavefronts during sinus rhythm collide in the site representing CP, indicating the area of slow pathway conduction. Ablation site was selected targeting LVB and CP site, confirmed by anatomic position on fluoroscopy and atrioventricular ratio. RESULTS: Twenty-seven consecutive patients were included. LVB and CP were present in all patients. Postprocedural evaluation identified standard cut-off of 0.3-1 mV useful for LVB identification. An overlap between LVB and CP was observed in 23 (85%) patients. Procedure success was achieved in all patient with effective site at first application in 22 (81%) patients. There was a significant correlation between LVB, CP, and the site of effective ablation (p = .001). CONCLUSION: We found correlation between LVB and CP with the site of effective ablation, identifying a voltage range useful for standardized LVB identification. These techniques could be useful to identify ablation site and minimize radiation exposure.

High-density mapping of Koch's triangle during sinus rhythm and typical atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia, integrated with direct recording of atrio-ventricular node structure potential.

BACKGROUND: The mechanism of typical slow-fast atrioventricular nodal re-entrant tachycardia (AVNRT) and its anatomical and electrophysiological circuit inside the right atrium (RA) and Koch's Triangle (KT) are not well known. OBJECTIVE: To identify the potentials of the compact AV node and inferior extensions and to perform accurate mapping of the RA and KT in sinus rhythm (SR) and during AVNRT, to define the tachycardia circuit. METHODS: Consecutive patients with typical AVNRT were enrolled in 12 Italian centers and underwent mapping and ablation by means of a basket catheter with small electrode spacing for ultrahigh-density mapping and a modified signal-filtering toolset to record the potentials of the AV nodal structures. RESULTS: Forty-five consecutive cases of successful ablation of typical slow-fast AVNRT were included. The mean SR cycle length (CL) was 784.1 ± 6 ms and the mean tachycardia CL was 361.2 ± 54 ms. The AV node potential had a significantly shorter duration and higher amplitude in sinus rhythm than during tachycardia (60 ± 40 ms vs. 160 ± 40 ms, p < .001 and 0.3 ± 0.2 mV vs. 0.09 ± 0.12 mV, p < .001, respectively). The nodal potential duration extension was 169.4 ± 31 ms, resulting in a time-window coverage of 47.6 ± 9%. The recording of AV nodal structure potentials enabled us to obtain 100% coverage of the tachycardia CL during slow-fast AVNRT. CONCLUSION: Detailed recording of the potentials of nodal structures is possible by means of multipolar catheters for ultrahigh-density mapping, allowing 100% of the AVNRT CL to be covered. These results also have clinical implications for the ablation of right-septal and para-septal arrhythmias.

Novel method to avoid serious injurious effects on the atrioventricular nodal (AVN) conduction during catheter ablation of the AVN slow pathway utilizing cryofreezing energy.

BACKGROUND: Slow pathway elimination of the atrioventricular node (AVN) is essential to treat AVN reentrant tachycardia (AVNRT). However, injury to the AVN conduction (IAVN) is one of the serious complications. Cryofreezing energy is expected to reduce the incidence of IAVN. This study aimed to investigate the usefulness of a novel method to avoid IAVN during cryoablation of AVNRT. METHODS: A total of 157 patients (average age, 65.8 years; male, 71) suffering from AVNRT were included. Once the AVNRT terminated during cryo-ablation, then rapid atrial constant pacing (RACP) was performed during freezing at a rate lower 10 bpm than that inducing Wenchebach AV block in 74 (47.1 %) patients (Group A). The RACP rate was decreasingly reduced by 10 bpm in case of the occurrence of IAVN. When the RACP reached 100 bpm, the cryoablation was prematurely terminated. Group B patients (83 = 52.9 %) underwent cryoablation during sinus rhythm. All patients were allocated in a randomized fashion. We compared the severity of the IAVN between Groups A and B. RESULTS: There were no significant differences at 12 months regarding the freedom from the AVNRT between Groups A and B. However, the duration of the IAVN was significantly longer in Group B than A (p = 0.02). There were no significant differences regarding the distance between the His recording sites and successful ablation sites between Groups A and B. No permanent IAVN requiring pacemaker implantation was provoked in either group. CONCLUSION: RACP was useful to avoid sustained and serious IAVN during cryoablation of AVNRT.

Cardioneuroablation for pediatric patients with functional sinus node dysfunction and paroxysmal atrioventricular block.

INTRODUCTION: Severe transitory episodes of bradycardia with subsequent syncope in children are common, and generally portend a benign prognosis. Rarely, patients may experience prolonged asystolic episodes secondary to significant sinus pauses (SP) or paroxysmal atrioventricular block (AVB). Cardioneuroablation (CNA) is a catheter-based intervention, used to identify and ablate the epicardial ganglionated plexi (GP), which results in disruption of the vagal-mediated parasympathetic input to the sinus and atrioventricular node. OBJECTIVE: Describe the methodology and role of CNA for treatment of pediatric patients with functional AVB or SP. METHODS: This is a single-center, case series study. Patients with SP or AVB, 21 years of age or younger, who underwent CNA between 2015 and 2021 were included. CNA was performed via anatomically guided and high-frequency stimulation methods. RESULTS: Six patients were included. The median age was 18.9 years (range 12.3-20.9 years), 33% female. Two patients had prolonged SP, two had paroxysmal AVB, and two had both SP and AVB. Four patients had prior syncope. The median longest pause was 8.9 s (range 3.9-16.8) with 11 total documented pauses (range 2-231) during the 6 months pre-CNA. Post-CNA, the median longest pause was 1.3 s (range 0.8-2.2) with one documented SP after termination of atrial tachycardia at the 3-month follow-up. At 6 months, the median longest pause was 1.1 s (0.8-1.3) with 0 documented pauses. No patients had syncope post-CNA. CONCLUSION: CNA may be an effective alternative to pacemaker implantation in pediatric patients with syncope or significant symptoms secondary to functional SP or AVB.

Successful Catheter Ablation for Paroxysmal Supraventricular Tachycardia with Two Alternating Cycle Lengths.

A 62-year-old male was transferred to our hospital complaining of palpitations. His heart rate was 185/min. Electrocardiogram showed a narrow QRS regular tachycardia and the tachycardia changed spontaneously to another narrow QRS tachycardia with two alternating cycle lengths. The arrhythmia was stopped by the administration of adenosine triphosphate. Findings from electrophysiological study suggested that there was an accessory pathway (AP) and dual atrioventricular (AV) nodal pathways. After AP ablation, any other tachyarrythmias were not induced. We supposed that the tachycardia was paroxysmal supraventricular tachycardia involving AP and anterograde conduction alternating between slow and fast AV nodal pathways.

The underrecognized and neglected compact atrioventricular nodal potential: clinical significance for preventing atrioventricular block during so-called slow pathway radiofrequency ablation.

BACKGROUND: The radiofrequency (RF) ablation target may be located at the compact atrioventricular node (AVN) region during so-called slow pathway (SP) RF ablation, potentially leading to transient or permanent atrioventricular block (AVB). However, related data are rare. METHODS: Among 715 index consecutive patients who underwent RF ablation for atrioventricular nodal re-entry tachycardia, 17 patients subsequently experienced transient or permanent AVB and were included in this retrospective observational study. RESULTS: Among the 17 patients, two patients (11.8%) developed transient first-degree AVB, four patients (23.5%) developed transient second-degree AVB, seven patients (41.2%) developed transient third-degree AVB, and four patients (23.5%) developed permanent third-degree AVB. During baseline sinus rhythm before the start of RF ablation, no His-bundle potential was recorded from the RF ablation catheter. During the so-called SP RF ablation that led to transient or permanent AVB, junctional rhythm with ventriculoatrial (VA) conduction block followed by subsequent AVB was observed in 14 of 17 patients (82.4%), and a low-amplitude, low-frequency hump-shaped atrial potential was recorded before the start of RF ablation in 7 of the 17 patients (41.2%). Direct AVB occurred in 3 of the 17 patients (17.6%), and a low-amplitude, low-frequency hump-shaped atrial potential was recorded before the start of RF ablation in all 3 patients. CONCLUSIONS: The low-amplitude, low-frequency hump-shaped atrial potential recorded at the so-called SP region may reflect the electrogram of compact AVN activation, and RF ablation to this site heralds impending AVB even when a His-bundle potential is not recorded.

Superior approach from the pocket for atrioventricular junction ablation performed at the time of conduction system pacing implantation.

BACKGROUND: Conduction system pacing (CSP) and atrioventricular junction ablation (AVJA) improve outcomes in patients with symptomatic, refractory atrial fibrillation (AF). Superior approach (SA) from the pocket via axillary or subclavian vein has been proposed as an alternative to the conventional femoral venous access (FA) to perform AVJA. OBJECTIVE: To assess the feasibility and safety of SA for AVJA performed simultaneously with CSP, and to compare this approach with FA. METHODS: A prospective, observational study, enrolling consecutive patients with symptomatic, refractory AF undergoing simultaneous CSP and AVJA. RESULTS: A total of 107 patients were enrolled: in 50, AVJA was primarily attempted with SA, in 69 from FA. AVJA with SA was successful in 38 patients (76.0%), while in 12 patients, a subsequent FA was required. AVJA from FA was successful in 68 patients (98.5%), while in one patient, a left-sided approach via femoral artery was required. Compared with FA, SA was associated with a significantly longer duration of ablation (238.0 ± 218.2 vs. 161.9 ± 181.9 s; p = .035), a significantly shorter procedure time (28.1 ± 19.8 vs. 19.8 ± 16.8 min; p = .018), an earlier ambulation (2.7 ± 3.2 vs. 19.8 ± 0.1 h; p < .001), and an earlier discharge from procedure completion (24.0 ± 2.7 vs. 27.1 ± 5.1 h; p < .001). After a median follow-up of 12 months, the rate of complications was similar in the two groups (2.0% in SA, 4.3% in FA; p = .483). CONCLUSION: Simultaneous CSP and AVJA with SA is feasible, with a safety profile similar to FA. Compared to FA, this approach reduces the procedure times and allows earlier ambulation and discharge.

Spontaneous Sinus Rhythm Restoration in Patients With Refractory, Permanent Atrial Fibrillation Who Underwent Conduction System Pacing and Atrioventricular Junction Ablation.

Ablate and pace (A&P) with conduction system pacing (CSP) improves outcomes in patients with symptomatic permanent atrial fibrillation (AF). Data on spontaneous sinus rhythm restoration (SSRR) in this setting are lacking. This study aimed to assess the incidence and the predictors of SSRR in a population of patients with permanent AF who underwent A&P with CSP. Prospective, observational study, enrolling consecutive patients with symptomatic permanent AF (of documented duration >6 months) and uncontrolled, drug-refractory high ventricular rate, who underwent A&P with CSP. The incidence and predictors of SSRR were prospectively assessed. A total of 107 patients (79.0 ± 9.1 years, 33.6% male, 74.8% with New York Heart Association class ≥III, 56.1% with ejection fraction <40%) were enrolled: 40 received His' bundle pacing, 67 left bundle branch area pacing. During a median follow-up of 12 months SSRR was observed in 14 patients (13.1%), occurring a median of 3 months after A&P (interquartile range 1 to 6; range 0 to 17). Multivariable analysis identified a duration of permanent AF <12 months (hazard ratio 7.7, p = 0.040) and a left atrial volume index <49 ml/m2 (hazard ratio 14.8, p = 0.008) as independent predictors of SSRR. In patients with coexistence of both predictors the incidence of SSRR was of 41.4%. In a population of patients with symptomatic, permanent AF, treated with A&P with CSP, SSRR was observed in 13% of patients during follow-up. A duration of permanent AF <12 months and a left atrial volume index <49 ml/m2 were independent predictors of this phenomenon.

Conduction system pacing and atrioventricular node ablation in heart failure: The PACE-FIB study design.

AIMS: Atrial fibrillation (AF) worsens the prognosis of patients with heart failure (HF). Successful treatments are still very scarce for those with permanent AF and preserved (HFpEF) or mildly reduced (HFmrEF) ejection fraction. In this study, the long-term benefits and safety profile of heart rate regularization through left-bundle branch pacing (LBBP) and atrioventricular node ablation (AVNA) will be explored in comparison with pharmacological rate-control strategy. METHODS AND RESULTS: The PACE-FIB trial is a multicentre, prospective, open-label, randomized (1:1) clinical study that will take place between March 2022 and February 2027. A total of 334 patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF and permanent AF will receive either LBBP followed by AVNA (intervention arm) or optimal pharmacological treatment for heart rate control according to European guideline recommendations (control arm). All patients will be followed up for a minimum of 36 months. The primary outcome measure will be the composite of all-cause mortality, HF hospitalization, and worsening HF at 36 months. Other secondary efficacy and safety outcome measures such as echocardiographic parameters, functional status, and treatment-related adverse events, among others, will be analysed too. CONCLUSION: LBBP is a promising stimulation mode that may foster the clinical benefit of heart rate regularization through AV node ablation compared with pharmacological rate control. This is the first randomized trial specifically addressing the long-term efficacy and safety of this pace-and-ablate strategy in patients with HFpEF/HFmrEF and permanent AF.

Atrioventricular nodal ablation is an effective management strategy for atrial fibrillation in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.

BACKGROUND: Atrial fibrillation (AF) is common in patients with hypertrophic cardiomyopathy (HCM) and can be challenging to manage. Atrioventricular nodal (AVN) ablation may be an effective management strategy for AF in these patients. OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to assess the efficacy of AVN ablation in HCM patients who have failed medical therapy and/or catheter ablation for AF. METHODS: A multicenter study with retrospective analysis of a prospectively collated HCM registry was performed. AVN ablation patients were identified. Baseline characteristics and device and procedural indications were collected. Symptoms defined by New York Heart Association and European Heart Rhythm Association classification and echocardiographic findings during follow-up were assessed. RESULTS: Fifty-nine patients were included in the study. Indications for AVN ablation were 6 (10.2%) inappropriate implantable cardioverter-defibrillator shock, 35 (59.3%) ineffective rate control, and 18 (30.5%) to regularize rhythm for symptom improvement. During post-AVN ablation follow-up of 79.4 ± 61.1 months, left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF) remained stable (pre-LVEF 48.9% ± 12.6% vs post-LVEF 50.1% ± 10.1%; P = .29), even in those without a cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) device (pre-LVEF 54.3% ± 8.0% vs post-LVEF 53.8% ± 8.0%; P = .65). Forty-nine patients (83.1%) reported an improvement in symptoms regardless of AF type (17/21 [81.0%] paroxysmal vs 32/38 [84.2%] persistent; P = 1.00), presence of baseline left ventricular impairment (22/26 [84.6%] LVEF ≤50% vs 27/33 [81.8%] LVEF ≥50%; P = 1.00) or CRT device (27/32 [84.4%] CRT vs 22/27 [81.5%] no CRT; P = 1.00). Symptoms improved in 16 patients (89.0%) who underwent AVN ablation to regularize rhythm. CONCLUSION: AVN ablation improved symptoms without impacting left ventricular function in the majority of patients. The data suggest that AVN ablation is an effective and safe management approach for AF in HCM and should be further evaluated in larger prospective studies.