Effectiveness of surgical interventions for managing obesity in children and adolescents: A systematic review and meta-analysis framed using minimal important difference estimates based on GRADE guidance to inform a clinical practice guideline.

OBJECTIVE: To summarize the literature on bariatric surgery for managing pediatric obesity, including intervention effects to improve patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs), cardiometabolic risk factors, anthropometry, and assess adverse events (AEs). METHODS: Eligible studies were published between January 2012 and January 2022 and included randomized controlled trials (RCTs) and observational (controlled and uncontrolled) studies before and after surgery with a mean age <18 years old. Outcomes and subgroups were selected a priori by stakeholders; estimates of effect for outcomes were presented relative to minimal important differences (MIDs) and GRADE certainty of evidence. We examined data on PROMs, cardiometabolic risk factors, anthropometry, and AEs. Subgroup analyses examined outcomes by follow-up duration and surgical technique, when possible. RESULTS: Overall, 63 publications (43 original studies) met our inclusion criteria (n = 6128 participants; 66% female). Studies reported six different surgical techniques that were evaluated using uncontrolled single arm observational (n = 49), controlled observational (n = 13), and RCT (n = 1) designs. Most studies included short-term follow-up (<18 months) only. PROMs were measured in 12 (28%) studies. Surgery led to large improvements in health-related quality of life compared to baseline and control groups, and moderate to very large improvements in cardiometabolic risk factors compared to baseline. Large to very large improvements in BMIz were noted compared to baseline across all follow-up periods. There was limited evidence of AEs with most reporting mild or non-specific AEs; serious AEs were uncommon. CONCLUSION: Bariatric surgery demonstrated primarily moderate to very large improvements across diverse outcomes with limited evidence of AEs, albeit with low to moderate certainty of evidence.

Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery for Adolescents.

Obesity is a chronic, complex, and multifactorial disease. Currently, approximately 6% have severe obesity with higher rates seen among racial/ethnic minority subgroups and in rural communities. Severe obesity is associated with cardiometabolic, psychologic, and musculoskeletal comorbidities. Metabolic and bariatric surgery is an effective treatment option for adolescents endorsed by major pediatric organizations. The most common procedure is the vertical sleeve gastrectomy. Pre-operative evaluation includes an in-depth medical, nutrition, physical activity and psychosocial assessment, with a care plan developed by a multidicplinary team with the adolescent and caregiver. The post-operative plan should include monitoring for surgical complications, weight regain, micronutrient deficiencies, psychologic challenges, and transition to adult care.

Application of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopy in the treatment of complicated appendicitis in overweight/obese adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the clinical efficacy of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic surgery in the treatment of complicated appendicitis in overweight/obese adolescents. METHODS: A retrospective analysis was conducted on the clinical data of 226 adolescent patients with complicated appendicitis who were admitted to our hospital from January 2014 to June 2022. Among them, 102 cases underwent transumbilical single-incision laparoscopic appendectomy as the observation group, and another 124 cases underwent conventional three-port laparoscopic appendectomy as the control group. The surgical time, intraoperative blood loss, duration of incisional pain, postoperative flatus time, length of hospital stay, surgical site infection (SSI), satisfaction with cosmetic result, and occurrence of postoperative complications were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: Both groups completed the surgery smoothly, and there were no statistically significant differences in gender, age, BMI, duration of illness, white blood cell count, and preoperative CRP value between the two groups (P > 0.05). There were no statistically significant differences in surgical time and intraoperative blood loss between the two groups (P > 0.05). However, the observation group had shorter hospital stays, shorter duration of incisional pain, shorter postoperative time to flatus, and lower overall postoperative complication rates compared to the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). The observation group had higher satisfaction with cosmetic result compared to the control group, with statistically significant differences (P < 0.05). Both groups were followed up for one year postoperatively, and there were no occurrences of residual appendicitis or severe adhesive intestinal obstruction. CONCLUSION: When proficiently mastered, the application of transumbilical single-incision laparoscopy in the treatment of complicated appendicitis in overweight/obese adolescents offers advantages such as minimal trauma, rapid recovery, fewer complications, and improved aesthetic outcomes.

Metabolic and bariatric surgery outcomes in adolescents: a single center's seven-year update.

BACKGROUND: Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) is gaining traction as a treatment option for adolescents with severe obesity. Since our weight center last published results in 2014, trends have shown increasingly diverse patient populations undergoing MBS and a shift from laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB) to sleeve gastrectomy (LSG). We assessed outcomes including follow-up, weight loss, comorbidity resolution, and complications among our recent adolescent and young adult MBS patients. METHODS: This is a retrospective cohort analysis of patients under 21 years of age with severe obesity who underwent MBS at a single institution between 2014 and 2020. Data on demographics, comorbidities, body mass index (BMI), percent of total body weight loss (%TBWL) at various timepoints, and subsequent complications were collected via chart review. Regression examined associations between preoperative factors, follow-up, and %TBWL. RESULTS: There were 79 patients of whom 73% were female; overall, 53% were White, 24% Hispanic, and 15% non-Hispanic Black. The majority (80%) of patients underwent LSG. Three-fourths of patients had follow-up data beyond 1 year, and half beyond 3 years. The median %TBWL of LSG patients was 23% at a median follow-up of 3.0 years, and LRYGB patients 28% at 2.4 years. No preoperative factors were associated with follow-up or final %TBWL, but 6-month %TBWL predicted final %TBWL. Preoperatively, 73% of patients had at least one weight-related comorbidity, and 57% had documented improvements in at least one after surgery. There were three 30-day readmissions and no mortalities. CONCLUSIONS: This study, which is an update to a previous series from our center, reflects recent national trends with nearly half non-White patients and predominance of LSG over LRYGB. It adds to a growing body of evidence indicating that MBS is a safe and effective method of achieving weight loss and comorbidity resolution in adolescents with severe obesity.

An open-label 16-week study of liraglutide in adolescents with obesity post-sleeve gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Up to 50% of adolescents who undergo metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) have obesity 3 years post-MBS, placing them at continued risk for the consequences of obesity. OBJECTIVES: We conducted an open-label, 16-week pilot study of liraglutide in adolescents with obesity after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) to investigate liraglutide effects on weight and body mass index (BMI) post-SG. METHODS: Adolescents aged 12-20.99 years with obesity and a history of SG ≥1 year prior were enrolled. Liraglutide was initiated at 0.6 mg/day, escalated weekly to a maximum of 3 mg/day, with treatment duration 16 weeks. Fasting laboratory assessments and an oral glucose tolerance test were performed at baseline and end-treatment. RESULTS: A total of 43 participants were screened, 34 initiated liraglutide (baseline BMI 41.2 ± 7.7 kg/m2), and 31 (91%) attended the end-treatment visit. BMI decreased by 4.3% (p < 0.001) with liraglutide. Adolescents who had poor initial response to SG (<20% BMI reduction at BMI nadir) had less weight loss with liraglutide. Fasting glucose and haemoglobin A1C concentrations significantly decreased. There were no serious treatment-emergent adverse events reported. CONCLUSIONS: Liraglutide treatment was feasible and associated with a BMI reduction of 4.3% in adolescents who had previously undergone SG, quantitatively similar to results obtained in adolescents with obesity who have not undergone MBS.

Cortisol/Cortisone Ratio in Youth with Obesity One Year Following Sleeve Gastrectomy.

Background: Glucocorticoid metabolites are associated with body composition measures and are altered with weight status. Metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) results in significant changes in weight and body composition. However, MBS effects on glucocorticoid metabolites are unknown. Objective: To evaluate (i) changes in the cortisol/cortisone ratio in youth with obesity 12 months after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) compared with nonsurgical controls with obesity (NS), and (ii) associations of these changes with body composition changes. Methods: A total of 38 participants 13-25 years old with obesity (29 female) were followed for 12 months. Half underwent SG, and the other half were followed with routine care (nonsurgical, NS). Fasting blood was assessed for cortisol and cortisone using liquid chromatography-mass spectroscopy as part of metabolomic analysis, and the cortisol/cortisone ratio was calculated. A single-slice MRI of the abdomen was performed to assess subcutaneous and visceral adipose tissue (SAT, VAT). Hepatic steatosis was assessed by computed tomography (CT). Results: SG did not differ from NS for baseline clinical characteristics, other than the mean age (SG 18.0 ± 0.46 vs. NS 16.6 ± 0.50 years, P = 0.041), BMI (BMI, 47.23 ± 1.5 vs. 41.32 ± 1.1 kg/m2, P = 0.003) weight and VAT, which were higher in SG. Significant reductions were noted over 12 months in BMI, BMI z-score, VAT, and SAT within the SG versus NS groups (P ≤ 0.001). Over 12 months, groups did not differ for changes in cortisol/cortisone ratio after controlling for age at baseline (P = 0.293). The ratio trended to decrease within the SG group [-1.40 (-5.08, 0.06), P = 0.080], particularly among those that had completed puberty (P = 0.048). No associations were found between changes in the cortisol/cortisone ratio and changes in body composition. Conclusions: The cortisol/cortisone ratio trended to decrease 12 months following SG. However, no associations were found between changes in the cortisol/cortisone ratio and changes in body composition. Studies with larger numbers of participants are necessary to confirm these findings.

Surgical and pharmacological treatment of childhood obesity.

The increase in obesity prevalence has been slowing down in numerous countries recently. WHO Europe has organized surveillance of childhood obesity (Childhood Obesity Surveillance Initiative, COSI) since 2008, which observed the prevalence of overweight and obesity of 6-9-year-old children is followed during this study and proved this result. The study Children's Health 2016 showed that after a period of the global increase of obesity until 2011, there was in the Czech Republic a period of certain stabilization, in which there weren´t major changes in weight. Unfortunately, the covid pandemic changed this trend and the current data from 2021 showed in the Czech Republic a serious increase in childhood obesity. For these children will be necessary to use a new type of treatment of obesity as a surgical and pharmacological specific treatment.

Factors Associated with Non-Completion of a Pediatric Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery Program.

BACKGROUND: Childhood obesity is a devastating disease process disproportionately affecting minority and low-income populations. Though bariatric surgery leads to durable weight loss and reversal of multiple obesity-related comorbidities, only a small fraction of pediatric patients undergoes the procedure. We sought to identify factors associated with non-completion in a pediatric bariatric surgery program. METHODS: Retrospective review of consecutive patients ≤18-years-old referred to an academic adolescent bariatric surgery program between 2017 and 2022 (n = 20 completers, 40 non-completers) was completed. Demographics and medical and psychosocial histories were summarized by completion status. RESULTS: Of the 33% (20/60; 85% female, 30% racial minorities) who successfully completed the program, the median age was 16 years [IQR 16, 17]. The median age of non-completers was 16 years [IQR 15, 17] (55% female, 56% racial minorities). Non-completion was associated with male gender (15% of completers vs 45% of non-completers, p = 0.022), neighborhood income <150% poverty level (0 completers vs 17.5% of non-completers, p = 0.047), and presence of environmental or family stressors (22% of completers vs 65% of non-completers, p = 0.008). Though not statistically significant, non-completers tended to be racial minorities (p = 0.054). CONCLUSIONS: Non-completion of the bariatric surgery pathway was more prevalent among male patients from lower-income neighborhoods with significant environmental or family stressors. These patients also tended to be racial and ethnic minorities. The findings underscore the need for further investigation into barriers to pediatric bariatric surgery. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.

Practice Patterns of Glucagon-Like Peptide-1 Agonist Use Among Pediatric Bariatric Surgeons: A National Survey.

INTRODUCTION: Glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1A) medications are gaining widespread popularity for the treatment of obesity. The optimal use of these drugs in pediatric bariatric populations, and especially in those considering metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS), is yet to be established. We sought to characterize current practice patterns of GLP-1A use at major pediatric bariatric centers across the United States. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We administered an online survey to a purposive sample of 46 surgeons who perform MBS on children and adolescents. Survey questions explored practices prescribing GLP-1As in patients considering MBS, holding them prior to elective operations, and restarting them postoperatively following MBS. Responses were summarized with descriptive statistics and inductive content analysis. RESULTS: There were 22 responses (48% response rate) representing 19 institutions. Most (86%) respondents do sometimes prescribe GLP-1As for patients considering MBS, but the specific indications vary. Practices for holding GLP-1As preoperatively also vary, from not at all to holding for 2 wk. Over half (55%) of respondents sometimes restart GLP-1As after MBS. Free-response themes included still-evolving preoperative utilization patterns, difficulty with access and insurance coverage, and a lack of data informing GLP-1A use in the pre and postoperative periods. CONCLUSIONS: Given the increasing use of these medications for weight loss purposes, this substantial variation in practice highlights a need for further research to examine the safest and most effective use of GLP-1As in the pre and postoperative periods and for practice guidelines to standardize care pathways in pediatric bariatric contexts.

Development of a Clinical Pathway for Bariatric Surgery as an Integral Part of a Comprehensive Treatment for Adolescents with Severe Obesity in the Netherlands.

INTRODUCTION: In the Netherlands, bariatric surgery in adolescents is currently only allowed in the context of scientific research. Besides this, there was no clinical pathway for bariatric surgery in adolescents. In this paper, the development of a comprehensive clinical pathway for bariatric surgery in adolescents with severe obesity in the Netherlands is described. METHODS: The clinical pathway for bariatric surgery in adolescents consists of an eligibility assessment as well as comprehensive peri- and postoperative care. Regarding the eligibility assessment, the adolescents need to be identified by their attending pediatricians and afterwards be evaluated by specialized pediatric obesity units. If the provided treatment is considered to be insufficiently effective, the adolescent will anonymously be evaluated by a national board. This is an additional diligence procedure specifically established for bariatric surgery in adolescents. The national board consists of independent experts regarding adolescent bariatric surgery and evaluates whether the adolescents meet the criteria defined by the national professional associations. The final step is an assessment by a multidisciplinary team for adolescent bariatric surgery. The various disciplines (pediatrician, bariatric surgeon, psychologist, dietician) evaluate whether an adolescent is eligible for bariatric surgery. In this decision-making process, it is crucial to assess whether the adolescent is expected to adhere to postoperative behavioral changes and follow-up. When an adolescent is deemed eligible for bariatric surgery, he or she will receive preoperative counseling by a bariatric surgeon to decide on the type of bariatric procedure (Roux-en-Y gastric bypass or sleeve gastrectomy). Postoperative care consists of intensive guidance by the multidisciplinary team for adolescent bariatric surgery. In this guidance, several regular appointments are included and additional care will be provided based on the needs of the adolescent and his or her family. Furthermore, the multidisciplinary lifestyle intervention, in which the adolescents participated before bariatric surgery, continues in coordination with the multidisciplinary team for adolescent bariatric surgery, and this ensures long-term counseling and follow-up. CONCLUSION: The implementation of bariatric surgery as an integral part of a comprehensive treatment for adolescents with severe obesity requires the development of a clinical pathway with a variety of disciplines.

Presurgery health influences outcomes following vertical sleeve gastrectomy in adolescents.

OBJECTIVE: Weight loss following vertical sleeve gastrectomy (VSG) in youth can range from 10% to 50%. We examined whether there are differences in demographic or metabolic parameters before VSG in youth who achieve above-average weight loss (AAWL) versus below-average weight loss (BAWL) at 1 year post VSG and if youth with BAWL still achieve metabolic health improvements at 1 year post VSG. METHODS: Demographic, anthropometric, and clinical lab data were collected before VSG and at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months after VSG. RESULTS: Forty-three youth with a mean age of 16.9 (SD 1.7) years before VSG were studied; 70% were female, 19% non-Hispanic Black, 58% non-Hispanic White, and 23% mixed/other race. Mean baseline BMI was 51.1 (SD 10.5) kg/m2. Average weight loss was 25.8%. The AAWL group lost 18.6 kg/m2 (35.3%) versus the BAWL group, who lost 8.8 kg/m2 (17.5%). BMI, age, race, sex, and socioeconomic status at baseline were similar between AAWL and BAWL groups; however, the BAWL group had a higher frequency of pre-VSG dysglycemia, steatotic liver disease, and dyslipidemia. At 1 year post VSG, fewer youth in the BAWL group achieved ideal health parameters, and they had less resolution of comorbidities. CONCLUSIONS: The presence of comorbidities before VSG is associated with less weight loss and reduced resolution of metabolic conditions at 1 year post VSG.

Adolescent bariatric surgery-a survey of referring practitioners.

BACKGROUND: Recent guidelines, supported by large, well-designed studies, suggest that bariatric surgery is a safe and effective treatment for adolescents living with severe obesity to improve health and psychosocial functioning. The aim of this study was to assess the opinions and referral practices of general practitioners (GPs) and paediatricians in Ireland. METHODS: A cross-sectional survey was circulated online to practising paediatricians and GPs. The survey consisted of a short introduction about childhood obesity and 12 questions on adolescent bariatric surgery and obesity medications. RESULTS: There were 45 unique responses to the survey from 22 GPs (48%), 8 paediatricians (17%), and 15 others. Most GPs (72%) would not consider referring an adolescent for bariatric surgery. Paediatricians were significantly more likely to refer (72% vs. 28%, p = 0.034). A minimum BMI of 40 kg/m2 was the most common response, which GPs (45%) and paediatricians (37.5%) suggested should be a pre-requisite for surgery. There was strong support for family psychological assessment and a reported deficit in the community support needed to manage obesity. GPs were more likely than paediatricians to respond that anti-obesity medications should be made available to adolescents, specifically liraglutide (45% vs. 25%), semaglutide (45% vs. 37.5%), and orlistat (22% vs. 0%). DISCUSSION: There is a reluctance among GPs to refer adolescents with severe obesity for consideration of bariatric surgery. Concerns regarding the different obesity treatments held by medical professionals should be addressed through education and engagement and should be fundamental to the development of child and adolescent obesity services.

Revisión bibliográfica: cirugía bariátrica en adolescentes / Bibliographic review: bariatric surgery in adolescents

La obesidad en la infancia y adolescencia es un problema de salud mundial que ha ido en aumento, esto es preocupante no sólo por el riesgo de comorbilidades cardiovasculares, sino que también las psicosociales. La cirugía bariátrica se ha convertido en una alternativa para los casos de obesidad severa en adolescentes. Se trata de un método invasivo que requiere evaluación cuidadosa, no sólo en el aspecto físico, sino que también en el psicológico y social. El objetivo de este trabajo es conocer la evidencia disponible sobre las consecuencias que conlleva la cirugía bariátrica en adolescentes. Se realizó una búsqueda en la literatura en base de datos como PubMed, ScienceDirect y Scopus, utilizando palabras clave como "cirugía bariátrica", "obesidad en adolescentes", "efectos psicosociales" y "salud mental". Se han identificado diversos efectos negativos, entre los cuales destacan las deficiencias nutricionales que afectan al sistema nervioso central, los impactos en la salud mental y el riesgo de psicopatología. Sin embargo, la mayor cantidad de información e investigación se centra en los efectos positivos de la cirugía bariátrica. Aún faltan estudios en población adolescente, especialmente de carácter prospectivo y documentación de los posibles efectos negativos en la salud.

Obesity in childhood and adolescence is a global health problem that has been on the rise, and it is highly concerning due to the risk of cardiovascular and psychosocial comorbidities. Bariatric surgery has become an alternative for cases of severe obesity in adolescents. It is an invasive method that requires careful evaluation, not only in the physical aspect but also in the psychological and social aspects. The aim of this study is to understand the available evidence regarding the consequences of bariatric surgery in adolescents. A literature search was conducted in databases such as PubMed, ScienceDirect, and Scopus, using keywords such as "bariatric surgery," "obesity in adolescents", "psychosocial effects," and "mental health." Among the negative effects found, complications related to nutritional deficiencies affecting the central nervous system, effects on mental health, and the risk of psychopathology are evident. However, most of the information and research focus on the positive effects of bariatric surgery. There is a lack of studies in the adolescent population, especially those of a prospective nature, and documentation of potential negative health effects.

Cognitive function 10 years after adolescent bariatric surgery.

BACKGROUND: Adolescent bariatric surgery produces substantial weight loss and reduction of medical co-morbidities. Research in adult samples shows improved cognitive function postoperatively, although much less is known about the potential cognitive benefits of bariatric surgery in adolescents-especially at extended follow-up. OBJECTIVE: Examine cognitive function 10 years after adolescent bariatric surgery. SETTING: University hospital. METHODS: A total of 99 young adults who underwent bariatric surgery as adolescents completed a computerized cognitive test battery as part of a larger 10-year postoperative assessment. All had been long-term participants in the Teen-Longitudinal Assessment of Bariatric Surgery (Teen-LABS) study. RESULTS: Cognitive dysfunction was prevalent on tests of attention and executive function (e.g., Continuous Performance Test - Reaction Time 30%; Maze Errors - Overrun 30%), and 53.5% met research criteria for mild cognitive impairment (MCI). Modified Poisson regression with robust error variance revealed participants with preoperative hypertension and those completing Roux-en-Y gastric bypass were more likely to meet criteria for MCI at 10-year follow-up. CONCLUSIONS: The current findings indicate that cognitive deficits are common 10 years after bariatric surgery. Additional studies are needed to clarify possible cohort effects, determine whether these cognitive deficits persist to even later follow-up (e.g., 20 yr after surgery), and identify underlying mechanisms and mitigation strategies.

Prevalence of Adolescents Meeting Criteria for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The American Academy of Pediatrics endorses metabolic and bariatric surgery (MBS) as a safe and effective treatment of severe obesity in children with class 3 obesity or with class 2 obesity and qualifying comorbidities. The study objective was to determine eligibility and characteristics of adolescents who qualify for MBS based on American Academy of Pediatrics guidelines. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed electronic health record data of 603 051 adolescents aged 13 to 17 years between January 1, 2018, and December 31, 2021. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention criteria were used to define obesity classes 2 and 3. Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the factors associated with meeting MBS eligibility criteria. RESULTS: Of the 603 041 adolescents evaluated, 22.2% had obesity (12.9% class 1, 5.4% class 2, and 3.9% class 3). The most frequently diagnosed comorbid conditions were gastroesophageal reflux disease (3.2%), hypertension (0.5%), and nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (0.5%). Among adolescents with class 2 obesity, 9.1% had 1 or more comorbidities qualifying for MBS, and 4.4% of all adolescents met the eligibility criteria for MBS. In multivariable modeling, males, Black and Hispanic adolescents, and those living in more deprived neighborhoods were more likely to meet MBS eligibility criteria. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, 1 in 23 adolescents met the eligibility criteria for MBS. Demographic and social determinants were associated with a higher risk for meeting these criteria. The study suggests that the health care system may face challenges in accommodating the demand for MBS among eligible adolescents.

Body Composition Changes in Adolescents Who Underwent Bariatric Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: The purpose of this review and meta-analysis is to characterize the changes in body composition of children and adolescents who underwent bariatric surgery and identify possible negative effects of performing this procedure during pediatric ages. RECENT FINDINGS: Bariatric surgery in children and adolescents is an emerging strategy to promote higher and faster body weight and fat mass losses. However, possible negative effects usually observed in surgical patients' muscle-skeletal system raise a major concern perform this intervention during growth. Despite these possible issues, most experimental studies and reviews analyze bariatric surgery's effectiveness only by assessing anthropometric outcomes such as body weight and BMI, disregarding the short- and long-term impact of bariatric surgery on all body composition outcomes. Bariatric surgery is effective to reduce fat mass in adolescents, as well as body weight, waist circumference, and BMI. Significant reduction in lean mass and fat-free mass is also observed. Bone mass seems not to be impaired. All outcomes reduction were observed only in the first 12 months after surgery. Sensitivity analysis suggests possible sex and type of surgery-related differences, favoring a higher fat mass, body weight, and BMI losses in boys and in patients who underwent RYGB.

Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery in Children: Current Practices and Outcomes.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review will examine the most current evidence for Metabolic and Bariatric Surgery (MBS) in the pediatric population, specifically in terms of weight loss outcomes and improvement in comorbid conditions and complications. Additionally, we compare surgical and non-surgical interventions, review current guidelines, and propose a stepwise evidence-based approach to the management of obesity in children. RECENT FINDINGS: MBS is a safe option for appropriately selected pediatric patients which leads to significant and sustained weight loss. This weight loss is associated with improvement of related comorbid conditions. Laparoscopic sleeve gastrectomy (LSG) has emerged as the procedure of choice with a better safety profile. Despite the evidence, very few adolescents undergo MBS. New pharmacologic agents specifically the GLP-1/GIP agents have shown early promise especially in patients under body mass index 40, but the long-term effects are unknown. MBS is an effective tool in the management of pediatric obesity, and its use has been recommended by professional societies. Early referral to a multidisciplinary obesity team can help identify appropriate patients.

Sleeve gastrectomy for the treatment of adolescent obesity in children aged 13 and under: a retrospective study.

BACKGROUND: Sleeve gastrectomy (SG) induces weight reduction and improves metabolic co-morbidities in children with severe obesity but remains underutilized, especially for young adolescents and preadolescents. OBJECTIVE: We hypothesized there would be no differences in weight loss or co-morbidity resolution at 1 year post-SG in children who underwent SG at 13 years or younger compared to children who underwent SG at 17-18 years old. SETTING: Academic medical center, United States. METHODS: Medical records of children who underwent laparoscopic SG at a quaternary academic center from September 2014 to October 2022 were reviewed. A cohort of 15 patients, ≤13 years of age, was compared to a matched cohort of 15 older adolescent patients. Preoperative characteristics and postoperative outcomes were collected. RESULTS: Both cohorts had similar baseline characteristics. Median preoperative body mass index (BMI) was 51.8 kg/m2 for the ≤13 cohort compared to 50.9 kg/m2 in the older cohort (P = .87). Time to postoperative enteral feeds and length of stay were similar between both groups, and there were no 30-day readmissions or immediate postoperative complications. Median percentage excess BMI loss at 1 year postoperation was 54% (IQR, 25.5%-94.5%) for the ≤13 cohort compared with 44% (IQR, 34.0%-51.0%) for the older cohort (P = .34). Two of 11 patients were lost to follow-up in the younger group compared to 4 of 15 in the older group (P = .61). Both groups demonstrated significant improvement in metabolic syndrome co-morbidities after SG. CONCLUSION: SG in younger children is associated with successful postsurgical outcomes compared with adolescents, with effective weight loss and improvement of obesity-related metabolic co-morbidities.