Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 3.145
Filtrar
1.
Transpl Int ; 37: 12659, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38751771

RESUMEN

The main limitation to increased rates of lung transplantation (LT) continues to be the availability of suitable donors. At present, the largest source of lung allografts is still donation after the neurologic determination of death (brain-death donors, DBD). However, only 20% of these donors provide acceptable lung allografts for transplantation. One of the proposed strategies to increase the lung donor pool is the use of donors after circulatory-determination-of-death (DCD), which has the potential to significantly alleviate the shortage of transplantable lungs. According to the Maastricht classification, there are five types of DCD donors. The first two categories are uncontrolled DCD donors (uDCD); the other three are controlled DCD donors (cDCD). Clinical experience with uncontrolled DCD donors is scarce and remains limited to small case series. Controlled DCD donation, meanwhile, is the most accepted type of DCD donation for lungs. Although the DCD donor pool has significantly increased, it is still underutilized worldwide. To achieve a high retrieval rate, experience with DCD donation, adequate management of the potential DCD donor at the intensive care unit (ICU), and expertise in combined organ procurement are critical. This review presents a concise update of lung donation after circulatory-determination-of-death and includes a step-by-step protocol of lung procurement using abdominal normothermic regional perfusion.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Perfusión , Donantes de Tejidos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/métodos , Perfusión/métodos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Muerte Encefálica , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Muerte
3.
Crit Care ; 28(1): 160, 2024 05 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38741176

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Limited data are available on organ donation practices and recipient outcomes, particularly when comparing donors who experienced cardiac arrest and received extracorporeal cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ECPR) followed by veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (ECMO) decannulation, versus those who experienced cardiac arrest without receiving ECPR. This study aims to explore organ donation practices and outcomes post-ECPR to enhance our understanding of the donation potential after cardiac arrest. METHODS: We conducted a nationwide retrospective cohort study using data from the Japan Organ Transplant Network database, covering all deceased organ donors between July 17, 2010, and August 31, 2022. We included donors who experienced at least one episode of cardiac arrest. During the study period, patients undergoing ECMO treatment were not eligible for a legal diagnosis of brain death. We compared the timeframes associated with each donor's management and the long-term graft outcomes of recipients between ECPR and non-ECPR groups. RESULTS: Among 370 brain death donors with an episode of cardiac arrest, 26 (7.0%) received ECPR and 344 (93.0%) did not; the majority were due to out-of-hospital cardiac arrests. The median duration of veno-arterial ECMO support after ECPR was 3 days. Patients in the ECPR group had significantly longer intervals from admission to organ procurement compared to those not receiving ECPR (13 vs. 9 days, P = 0.005). Lung graft survival rates were significantly lower in the ECPR group (log-rank test P = 0.009), with no significant differences in other organ graft survival rates. Of 160 circulatory death donors with an episode of cardiac arrest, 27 (16.9%) received ECPR and 133 (83.1%) did not. Time intervals from admission to organ procurement following circulatory death and graft survival showed no significant differences between ECPR and non-ECPR groups. The number of organs donated was similar between the ECPR and non-ECPR groups, regardless of brain or circulatory death. CONCLUSIONS: This nationwide study reveals that lung graft survival was lower in recipients from ECPR-treated donors, highlighting the need for targeted research and protocol adjustments in post-ECPR organ donation.


Asunto(s)
Reanimación Cardiopulmonar , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Reanimación Cardiopulmonar/estadística & datos numéricos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/estadística & datos numéricos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/tendencias , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/estadística & datos numéricos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/tendencias , Adulto , Japón/epidemiología , Estudios de Cohortes , Donantes de Tejidos/estadística & datos numéricos , Paro Cardíaco/terapia , Paro Cardíaco/mortalidad , Anciano , Muerte Encefálica
4.
J Am Heart Assoc ; 13(10): e033590, 2024 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38742529

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The new heart allocation policy places veno-arterial extracorporeal membrane oxygenation (VA-ECMO)-supported heart transplant (HT) candidates at the highest priority status. Despite increasing evidence supporting left ventricular (LV) unloading during VA-ECMO, the effect of LV unloading on transplant outcomes following bridging to HT with VA-ECMO remains unknown. METHODS AND RESULTS: From October 18, 2018 to March 21, 2023, 624 patients on VA-ECMO at the time of HT were identified in the United Network for Organ Sharing database and were divided into 2 groups: VA-ECMO alone (N=384) versus VA-ECMO with LV unloading (N=240). Subanalysis was performed in the LV unloading group: Impella (N=106) versus intra-aortic balloon pump (N=134). Recipient age was younger in the VA-ECMO alone group (48 versus 53 years, P=0.018), as was donor age (VA-ECMO alone, 29 years versus LV unloading, 32 years, P=0.041). One-year survival was comparable between groups (VA-ECMO alone, 88.0±1.8% versus LV unloading, 90.4±2.1%; P=0.92). Multivariable Cox hazard model showed LV unloading was not associated with posttransplant mortality after HT (hazard ratio, 0.92; P=0.70). Different LV unloading methods had similar 1-year survival (intra-aortic balloon pump, 89.2±3.0% versus Impella, 92.4±2.8%; P=0.65). Posttransplant survival was comparable between different Impella versions (Impella 2.5, versus Impella CP, versus Impella 5.0, versus Impella 5.5). CONCLUSIONS: Under the current allocation policy, LV unloading did not impact waitlist outcome and posttransplant survival in patients bridged to HT with VA-ECMO, nor did mode of LV unloading. This highlights the importance of a tailored approach in HT candidates on VA-ECMO, where routine LV unloading may not be universally necessary.


Asunto(s)
Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea , Trasplante de Corazón , Corazón Auxiliar , Humanos , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto , Función Ventricular Izquierda , Estudios Retrospectivos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/terapia , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Factores de Tiempo , Listas de Espera/mortalidad , Contrapulsador Intraaórtico
5.
Ann Transplant ; 29: e943588, 2024 May 21.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38769724

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND According to the current guidelines for liver transplantation (LT) of brain-dead donors with hepatitis B or C virus (HBV or HCV) in Korea, grafts from hepatitis B surface antigen (HBsAg)(+) or HCV antibody (anti-HCV)(+) donors must be transplanted only to HBsAg(+) or anti-HCV(+) recipients, respectively. We aimed to determine the current status and outcomes of brain-dead donor LT with HBV or HCV in Korea. MATERIAL AND METHODS This retrospective observational study included all LTs from brain-dead donors in the Korean Organ Transplantation Registry between April 2014 and December 2020. According to donor hepatitis status, 24 HBV(+), 1 HCV(+), and 1010 HBV(-)/HCV(-) donors were included. RESULTS Baseline/final model for end-stage liver disease score (MELD) for HBV(+), HCV(+), and HBV(-)/HCV(-) were 22.4±9.3/27.8±7.8, 16/11, and 33.0±15.4/35.5±7.1, respectively. MELD score of HBV (+) were lower than those of HBV(-)/HCV(-) (P<0.01). Five-year graft and patient survival rates of HBV(+) and HBV(-)/HCV(-) recipients were 81.7%/85.6%, and 76.6%/76.7%, respectively (P=0.73 and P=0.038). One-year graft and patient survival rates of HCV (+) graft recipients were both 100%. CONCLUSIONS No differences in graft and patient survival rates between HBV(+) and HBV(-)/HCV(-) groups were observed. Although accumulating the results of transplants from HBV (+) or HCV(+) grafts to HBV(-) or HCV(-) recipients is not possible owing to domestic regulations, Korea should conditionally permit transplantations from HBV(+) or HCV(+) grafts to HBV(-) or HCV(-) recipients by considering the risks and benefits based on foreign studies. Thereafter, we can accumulate the data from Korea and analyze the outcomes.


Asunto(s)
Muerte Encefálica , Hepatitis B , Hepatitis C , Trasplante de Hígado , Sistema de Registros , Donantes de Tejidos , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , República de Corea/epidemiología , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Hepatitis B/cirugía , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Hepatitis C/cirugía , Supervivencia de Injerto , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/cirugía
7.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38728012

RESUMEN

A combined heart+liver transplant is the only option for survival in some patients with end-stage combined cardiac and hepatic disease. These patients may suffer from congenital or acquired cardiac disease. The potential aetiologies of the associated hepatic disease are heterogeneous and include systemic disease that impacts the liver as well as venous congestion in patients with functionally univentricular circulation. In the latter scenario, patients with functionally univentricular circulation often require complex cardiac reconstruction in the setting of a cardiac transplant after staged palliation. During cardiac procurement, our approach is to dissect the entire ascending aorta and aortic arch in continuity; the entire superior caval vein and innominate vein in continuity; and the pulmonary arteries from hilum to hilum if the donor is not a candidate for recovery of the lungs. The cardiac and abdominal organ procurement teams work in parallel during dissection and combined en bloc cardio-hepatectomy. This technique minimizes exposure of both organs to cold ischaemia. This video tutorial demonstrates the key steps for combined en bloc heart+liver organ procurement.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Trasplante de Hígado , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Trasplante de Hígado/métodos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Trasplante de Corazón/métodos , Recolección de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos
8.
Clin Transplant ; 38(5): e15315, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38686443

RESUMEN

Kidney transplantation is the most successful kidney replacement therapy available, resulting in improved recipient survival and societal cost savings. Yet, nearly 70 years after the first successful kidney transplant, there are still numerous barriers and untapped opportunities that constrain the access to transplant. The literature describing these barriers is extensive, but the practices and processes to solve them are less clear. Solutions must be multidisciplinary and be the product of strong partnerships among patients, their networks, health care providers, and transplant programs. Transparency in the referral, evaluation, and listing process as well as organ selection are paramount to build such partnerships. Providing early culturally congruent and patient-centered education as well as maximizing the use of local resources to facilitate the transplant work up should be prioritized. Every opportunity to facilitate pre-emptive kidney transplantation and living donation must be taken. Promoting the use of telemedicine and kidney paired donation as standards of care can positively impact the work up completion and maximize the chances of a living donor kidney transplant.


Asunto(s)
Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud , Fallo Renal Crónico , Trasplante de Riñón , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Fallo Renal Crónico/cirugía , Donadores Vivos/provisión & distribución , Listas de Espera
11.
Int J Mol Sci ; 25(8)2024 Apr 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38673737

RESUMEN

Heart transplantation with donation after circulatory death (DCD) provides excellent patient outcomes and increases donor heart availability. However, unlike conventional grafts obtained through donation after brain death, DCD cardiac grafts are not only exposed to warm, unprotected ischemia, but also to a potentially damaging pre-ischemic phase after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapy (WLST). In this review, we aim to bring together knowledge about changes in cardiac energy metabolism and its regulation that occur in DCD donors during WLST, circulatory arrest, and following the onset of warm ischemia. Acute metabolic, hemodynamic, and biochemical changes in the DCD donor expose hearts to high circulating catecholamines, hypoxia, and warm ischemia, all of which can negatively impact the heart. Further metabolic changes and cellular damage occur with reperfusion. The altered energy substrate availability prior to organ procurement likely plays an important role in graft quality and post-ischemic cardiac recovery. These aspects should, therefore, be considered in clinical protocols, as well as in pre-clinical DCD models. Notably, interventions prior to graft procurement are limited for ethical reasons in DCD donors; thus, it is important to understand these mechanisms to optimize conditions during initial reperfusion in concert with graft evaluation and re-evaluation for the purpose of tailoring and adjusting therapies and ensuring optimal graft quality for transplantation.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Corazón , Humanos , Trasplante de Corazón/métodos , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Animales , Perfusión/métodos , Donantes de Tejidos , Metabolismo Energético
12.
Transpl Int ; 37: 12791, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38681973

RESUMEN

Intensive Care to facilitate Organ Donation (ICOD) consists of the initiation or continuation of intensive care measures in patients with a devastating brain injury (DBI) in whom curative treatment is deemed futile and death by neurological criteria (DNC) is foreseen, to incorporate organ donation into their end-of-life plans. In this study we evaluate the outcomes of patients subject to ICOD and identify radiological and clinical factors associated with progression to DNC. In this first prospective multicenter study we tested by multivariate regression the association of clinical and radiological severity features with progression to DNC. Of the 194 patients, 144 (74.2%) patients fulfilled DNC after a median of 25 h (95% IQR: 17-44) from ICOD onset. Two patients (1%) shifted from ICOD to curative treatment, both were alive at discharge. Factors associated with progression to DNC included: age below 70 years, clinical score consistent with severe brain injury, instability, intracranial hemorrhage, midline shift ≥5 mm and certain types of brain herniation. Overall 151 (77.8%) patients progressed to organ donation. Based on these results, we conclude that ICOD is a beneficial and efficient practice that can contribute to the pool of deceased donors.


Asunto(s)
Cuidados Críticos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Femenino , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , España , Adulto , Lesiones Encefálicas , Muerte Encefálica , Unidades de Cuidados Intensivos
13.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 43(6): 1021-1029, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38432523

RESUMEN

In a workshop sponsored by the U.S. National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute, experts identified current knowledge gaps and research opportunities in the scientific, conceptual, and ethical understanding of organ donation after the circulatory determination of death and its technologies. To minimize organ injury from warm ischemia and produce better recipient outcomes, innovative techniques to perfuse and oxygenate organs postmortem in situ, such as thoracoabdominal normothermic regional perfusion, are being implemented in several medical centers in the US and elsewhere. These technologies have improved organ outcomes but have raised ethical and legal questions. Re-establishing donor circulation postmortem can be viewed as invalidating the condition of permanent cessation of circulation on which the earlier death determination was made and clamping arch vessels to exclude brain circulation can be viewed as inducing brain death. Alternatively, TA-NRP can be viewed as localized in-situ organ perfusion, not whole-body resuscitation, that does not invalidate death determination. Further scientific, conceptual, and ethical studies, such as those identified in this workshop, can inform and help resolve controversies raised by this practice.


Asunto(s)
Muerte , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/ética , Estados Unidos , National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (U.S.) , Trasplante de Pulmón , Donantes de Tejidos , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Trasplante de Corazón
14.
Curr Opin Pulm Med ; 30(4): 398-404, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38546199

RESUMEN

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: Lung transplantation activity continues to be limited by the availability of timely quality donor lungs. It is apparent though that progress has been made. The steady evolution of clinical practice, combined with painstaking scientific discovery and innovation are described. RECENT FINDINGS: There have been successful studies reporting innovations in the wider use and broader consideration of donation after circulatory death donor lungs, including an increasing number of transplants from each of the controlled, uncontrolled and medically assisted dying donor descriptive categories. Donors beyond age 70 years are providing better than expected long-term outcomes. Hepatitis C PCR positive donor lungs can be safely used if treated postoperatively with appropriate antivirals. Donor lung perfusion at a constant 10 degrees appears capable of significantly improving donor logistics and ex-vivo lung perfusion offers the potential of an ever-increasing number of novel donor management roles. Bioartificial and xenografts remain distant possibilities only at present. SUMMARY: Donor lungs have proved to be surprisingly robust and combined with clinical, scientific and engineering innovations, the realizable lung donor pool is proving to be larger than previously thought.


Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Pulmón , Donantes de Tejidos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Trasplante de Pulmón/métodos , Donantes de Tejidos/provisión & distribución , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos
17.
Ann Neurol ; 95(6): 1035-1039, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38501716

RESUMEN

Normothermic regional perfusion (NRP) has recently been used to augment organ donation after circulatory death (DCD) to improve the quantity and quality of transplantable organs. In DCD-NRP, after withdrawal of life-sustaining therapies and cardiopulmonary arrest, patients are cannulated onto extracorporeal membrane oxygenation to reestablish blood flow to targeted organs including the heart. During this process, aortic arch vessels are ligated to restrict cerebral blood flow. We review ethical challenges including whether the brain is sufficiently reperfused through collateral circulation to allow reemergence of consciousness or pain perception, whether resumption of cardiac activity nullifies the patient's prior death determination, and whether specific authorization for DCD-NRP is required. ANN NEUROL 2024;95:1035-1039.


Asunto(s)
Perfusión , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Perfusión/métodos , Muerte , Circulación Cerebrovascular/fisiología , Paro Cardíaco , Oxigenación por Membrana Extracorpórea/métodos , Preservación de Órganos/métodos
18.
Burns ; 50(5): 1062-1067, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38402119

RESUMEN

AIM: This paper describes how Singapore achieved skin allograft self-sufficiency in 2017 by adopting 5 key strategies in 2012. BACKGROUND: Singapore General Hospital (SGH) established its own allograft recovery programme in 1998 but was still dependent on overseas allograft procurement. KEY STRATEGIES: RESULTS: The allograft recovery programme expanded from 4 to all 20 institutions. Donor referrals increased by 42.9% from 35 in 2014 to over 50 currently. Donor numbers increased by 210%, rising from 4.5 per year before 2015 to an average of 14 per year from 2015 to 2022. The total allografts recovered increased by 223%, climbing from 13,000 to 42,000 annually. Cryopreservation was adopted, extending shelf life to 5.5 years and doubling storage capacity to more than 140,000 cm2 in 2022. CONCLUSION: Singapore achieved skin allograft self-sufficiency with no overseas procurement since 2017.


Asunto(s)
Aloinjertos , Quemaduras , Criopreservación , Trasplante de Piel , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Singapur , Trasplante de Piel/métodos , Quemaduras/cirugía , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/organización & administración , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Donantes de Tejidos , Trasplante Homólogo , Derivación y Consulta
19.
JAMA ; 331(6): 500-509, 2024 02 13.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38349372

RESUMEN

Importance: The US heart allocation system prioritizes medically urgent candidates with a high risk of dying without transplant. The current therapy-based 6-status system is susceptible to manipulation and has limited rank ordering ability. Objective: To develop and validate a candidate risk score that incorporates current clinical, laboratory, and hemodynamic data. Design, Setting, and Participants: A registry-based observational study of adult heart transplant candidates (aged ≥18 years) from the US heart allocation system listed between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022, split by center into training (70%) and test (30%) datasets. Adult candidates were listed between January 1, 2019, and December 31, 2022. Main Outcomes and Measures: A US candidate risk score (US-CRS) model was developed by adding a predefined set of predictors to the current French Candidate Risk Score (French-CRS) model. Sensitivity analyses were performed, which included intra-aortic balloon pumps (IABP) and percutaneous ventricular assist devices (VAD) in the definition of short-term mechanical circulatory support (MCS) for the US-CRS. Performance of the US-CRS model, French-CRS model, and 6-status model in the test dataset was evaluated by time-dependent area under the receiver operating characteristic curve (AUC) for death without transplant within 6 weeks and overall survival concordance (c-index) with integrated AUC. Results: A total of 16 905 adult heart transplant candidates were listed (mean [SD] age, 53 [13] years; 73% male; 58% White); 796 patients (4.7%) died without a transplant. The final US-CRS contained time-varying short-term MCS (ventricular assist-extracorporeal membrane oxygenation or temporary surgical VAD), the log of bilirubin, estimated glomerular filtration rate, the log of B-type natriuretic peptide, albumin, sodium, and durable left ventricular assist device. In the test dataset, the AUC for death within 6 weeks of listing for the US-CRS model was 0.79 (95% CI, 0.75-0.83), for the French-CRS model was 0.72 (95% CI, 0.67-0.76), and 6-status model was 0.68 (95% CI, 0.62-0.73). Overall c-index for the US-CRS model was 0.76 (95% CI, 0.73-0.80), for the French-CRS model was 0.69 (95% CI, 0.65-0.73), and 6-status model was 0.67 (95% CI, 0.63-0.71). Classifying IABP and percutaneous VAD as short-term MCS reduced the effect size by 54%. Conclusions and Relevance: In this registry-based study of US heart transplant candidates, a continuous multivariable allocation score outperformed the 6-status system in rank ordering heart transplant candidates by medical urgency and may be useful for the medical urgency component of heart allocation.


Asunto(s)
Insuficiencia Cardíaca , Trasplante de Corazón , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bilirrubina , Servicios de Laboratorio Clínico , Corazón , Factores de Riesgo , Medición de Riesgo , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/mortalidad , Insuficiencia Cardíaca/cirugía , Estados Unidos , Asignación de Recursos para la Atención de Salud/métodos , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/organización & administración
20.
J Heart Lung Transplant ; 43(6): 954-962, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38423416

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Since 2019, the annual transplantation rate of hearts donated following circulatory death (DCD) has increased significantly in the United States. The 2 major heart procurement techniques following circulatory death are direct procurement and perfusion (DPP) and normothermic regional perfusion (NRP). Post-transplant survival for heart recipients has not been compared between these 2 techniques. METHODS: This observational study uses data on adult heart transplants from donors after circulatory death from January 1, 2019 to December 31, 2021 in the Scientific Registry of Transplant Recipients. We identified comparable transplant cases across procurement types using propensity-score matching and measured the association between procurement technique and 1-year post-transplant survival using Kaplan-Meier and Cox proportional hazards model stratefied by matching pairs. RESULTS: Among 318 DCD heart transplants, 216 (68%) were procured via DPP, and 102 (32%) via NRP. Among 22 transplant centers that accepted circulatory-death donors, 3 used NRP exclusively, and 5 used both procurement techniques. After propensity-score matching on recipient and donor factors, there was no significant difference in 1-year post-transplant survival (93.1% for NRP vs 91.1% for DPP, p = 0.79) between procurement techniques. CONCLUSIONS: NRP and DPP procurements are associated with similar 1-year post-transplant survival. If NRP is ethically permissible and improves outcomes for abdominal organs, it should be the preferred procurement technique for DCD hearts.


Asunto(s)
Supervivencia de Injerto , Trasplante de Corazón , Preservación de Órganos , Perfusión , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos , Humanos , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Obtención de Tejidos y Órganos/métodos , Perfusión/métodos , Supervivencia de Injerto/fisiología , Preservación de Órganos/métodos , Adulto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Donantes de Tejidos , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Tasa de Supervivencia/tendencias , Muerte , Estudios de Seguimiento , Sistema de Registros
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA