Comparison of Endovascular Therapy and Open Surgical Revascularization in Patients With Acute Superior Mesenteric Artery Occlusion: A Large-Scale Analysis Based on the JROAD-DPC Database.

BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischemia is rare, and few large-scale trials have evaluated endovascular therapy (EVT) and open surgical revascularization (OS). This study aimed to assess clinical outcomes after EVT or OS for acute superior mesenteric artery occlusion and identify predictors of mortality and bowel resection. METHODS AND RESULTS: Data from the Japanese Registry of All Cardiac and Vascular Diseases-Diagnosis Procedure Combination (JROAD-DPC) database from April 2012 to March 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Overall, 746 patients with acute superior mesenteric artery occlusion who underwent revascularization were classified into 2 groups: EVT (n=475) or OS (n=271). The primary clinical outcome was in-hospital mortality. The secondary outcomes were bowel resection, bleeding complications (transfusion or endoscopic hemostasis), major adverse cardiovascular events, hospitalization duration, and cost. The in-hospital death or bowel resection rate was ≈30%. In-hospital mortality (22.5% versus 21.4%, P=0.72), bowel resection (8.2% versus 8.5%, P=0.90), and major adverse cardiovascular events (11.6% versus 9.2%, P=0.32) were comparable between the EVT and OS groups. Hospitalization duration in the EVT group was 6 days shorter than that in the OS group, and total hospitalization cost was 0.88 million yen lower. Interaction analyses revealed that EVT and OS had no significant difference in terms of in-hospital death in patients with thromboembolic and atherothrombotic characteristics. Advanced age, decreased activities of daily living, chronic kidney disease, and old myocardial infarction were significant predictive factors for in-hospital mortality. Diabetes was a predictor of bowel resection after revascularization. CONCLUSIONS: EVT was comparable to OS in terms of clinical outcomes in patients with acute superior mesenteric artery occlusion. Some predictive factors for mortality or bowel resection were obtained. REGISTRATION: URL: www.umin.ac.jp/ctr/; Unique Identifier: UMIN000045240.

A decade's experience with retrograde open mesenteric stenting for acute mesenteric ischemia.

OBJECTIVE: Retrograde open mesenteric stenting (ROMS) is an alternative to mesenteric bypass in patients with acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) with variable reported 30-day mortality rates. Large studies evaluating patient outcomes following ROMS are scarce. Our study aims to assess the results of this approach among patients presenting with AMI. METHODS: We reviewed all the patients with AMI who were treated with ROMS (2011-2022). Patient demographics, presentation, operative details, and outcomes were analyzed. Primary end points were in-hospital, 30-day, and 1-year mortality. Kaplan-Meier estimate for 1-year mortality and primary patency loss were generated. Secondary end points included postoperative 30-day complications. RESULTS: Between 2011 and 2022, ROMS was attempted on a total of 42 patients. The median age was 70 ± 15 years and the majority of patients were female. Pain out of proportion to the physical examination was the most common presenting symptom (n = 18, 42.9%) followed by peritonitis (n = 14, 33.4%). All patients underwent preoperative intravenous contrast computed tomography imaging. In situ thrombosis was identified as the etiology of AMI in 36 patients (85.7%). Technical success was achieved in 40 patients (95.2%). Conventional, non-hybrid operating rooms were used for the majority of cases. Revascularization of all 40 patients involved angioplasty and stenting of superior mesenteric artery. A single stent was placed in 35 patients (87.5%) and the reminder had more than one stent. Eighty percent of patients required bowel resection. A second-look laparotomy was required in 34 patients (85.0%). The mean operative time, including both the general surgery and vascular surgery portions of the index procedure, was 192 ± 57 minutes. Sepsis was the most common complication observed within 30 days, occurring in 8 patients (20.0%). In terms of mortality, 13 patients (32.5%) died during their index hospitalization, and 9 died (22.5%) within 30 days. On Kaplan-Meier analysis, the 1-year overall patient survival rate was 58.6%, and the primary patency rate for stents was 51.4%. CONCLUSIONS: ROMS has an excellent technical success rate in management of AMI with lower than traditionally reported mortality rates for AMI. The dual benefits of rapid revascularization and bowel evaluation should make this surgical modality an alternative approach for treatment of AMI.

Percutaneous Mechanical Thrombectomy Using the AcoStream Thrombus Aspiration System for Acute Superior Mesenteric Artery Embolism.

BACKGROUND: This study was performed to summarize our experience in treating acute superior mesenteric artery embolism (SMAE) by percutaneous mechanical thrombectomy (PMT). METHODS: Between January 2023 and October 2023, 18 patients presenting with acute mesenteric ischemia were admitted to our center, including 11 cases of SMAE, 3 cases of superior mesenteric artery thrombosis, and 4 cases of superior mesenteric vein thrombosis. We retrospectively reviewed 8 patients (4 males and 4 females; range, 51-79 years; mean, 62.50 ± 9.67 years) who underwent treatment of acute SMAE using the AcoStream system. The patients had no obvious evidence of intestinal necrosis as shown by peritoneal puncture or computed tomography. Thrombectomy was performed on the superior mesenteric artery (SMA) using an 8F AcoStream thrombus aspiration system (Acotec, China). The demographics, risk factors, therapeutic effect, complications, mortality, and follow-up of the study population were assessed. RESULTS: The technical success rate was 100%. After 1-3 passes (2.38 ± 0.92) and aspiration thrombectomy, complete thrombus removal was achieved in 7 (87.50%) patients. One patient received an adjunctive catheter-directed thrombolysis due to partial thrombus removal. Thrombolysis was conducted for 2 days, resulting in complete resolution of the thrombus. The other 7 patients did not receive adjunctive endovascular intervention due to complete thrombus removal and no residual stenosis. No distal embolization or device-related complications were noted during the procedure. After the procedure, sufficient clinical improvement was seen in 6 patients within 1-2 days. Two patients showed no significant improvement of their symptoms. Laparotomy was performed on day 1 and day 2 after thrombectomy in patients 3 and 7, respectively. Intestinal necrosis was diagnosed operatively and intestinal resection was performed. All patients were discharged 6-15 days (9.50 ± 3.07) after admission without perioperative complication or death. The mean follow-up period was 5.00 ± 3.30 months (range, 1-10 months), and the follow-up rate was 100%. During the follow-up, all patients remained symptom-free. Computed tomography angiography images showed good flow in the trunk and branches of the SMA in all patients. CONCLUSIONS: PMT using the AcoStream system is a minimally invasive, safe, and effective technique for acute SMAE. Early application of PMT can achieve immediate revascularization of the SMA and have the potential advantage of avoiding laparotomy or reducing the extension of enterectomy, as it could theoretically restore intestinal perfusion in less time than open revascularization. If the symptoms do not improve after PMT, exploratory laparotomy should be scheduled as soon as possible. Further studies are necessary on this field to confirm these findings.

Comparative outcomes of open mesenteric bypass after a failed endovascular or open mesenteric revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia.

INTRODUCTION: Clinical practice guidelines have recommended an endovascular-first approach (ENDO) for the management of patients with chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI), whereas an open mesenteric bypass (OMB) is proposed for subjects deemed to be poor ENDO candidates. However, the impact of a previous failed endovascular or open mesenteric reconstruction on a subsequent OMB is unknown. Accordingly, this study was designed to examine the results of a remedial OMB (R-OMB) after a failed ENDO or a primary OMB (P-OMB) for patients with recurrent CMI. METHODS: All patients who underwent an OMB from 2002 to 2022 at the University of Florida were reviewed. Outcomes after an R-OMB (ie, history of a failed ENDO or P-OMB) and P-OMB were compared. The primary end point was 30-day mortality, whereas secondary outcomes included complications, reintervention, and survival. The Kaplan-Meier methodology was used to estimate freedom from reintervention and all-cause mortality, whereas multivariable Cox proportional hazards modeling identified predictors of death. RESULTS: A total of 145 OMB procedures (R-OMB, n = 48 [33%]; P-OMB, n = 97 [67%]) were analyzed. A majority of R-OMB operations were performed for a failed stent (prior ENDO, n = 39 [81%]; prior OMB, n = 9 [19%]). R-OMB patients were generally younger (66 ± 9 years vs P-OMB, 69 ± 11 years; P = .09) and had lower incidence of smoking exposure (29% vs P-OMB, 48%; P = .07); however, there were no other differences in demographics or comorbidities. R-OMB was associated with less intraoperative transfusion (0.6 units vs P-OMB, 1.4 units; P = .01), but there were no differences in conduit choice or bypass configuration.The overall 30-day mortality and complication rates were 7% (n = 10/145) and 53% (n = 77/145), respectively, with no difference between the groups. Notably, R-OMB had decreased cardiac (6% vs P-OMB, 21%; P < .01) and bleeding complication rates (2% vs P-OMB, 15%; P = .01). The freedom from reintervention (1 and 5 years: R-OMB: 95% ± 4%, 83% ± 9% vs P-OMB: 97% ± 2%, 93% ± 5%, respectively; log-rank P = .21) and survival (1 and 5 years: R-OMB: 82% ± 6%, 68% ± 9% vs P-OMB: 84% ± 4%, 66% ± 7%; P = .91) were similar. Independent predictors of all-cause mortality included new postoperative hemodialysis requirement (hazard ratio [HR], 7.4, 95% confidence interval [CI], 3.1-17.3; P < .001), pulmonary (HR, 2.7, 95% CI, 1.4-5.3; P = .004) and cardiac (HR, 2.4, 95% CI, 1.1-5.1; P = .04) complications, and female sex (HR, 2.1, 95% CI, 1.03-4.8; P = .04). Notably, R-OMB was not a predictor of death. CONCLUSIONS: The perioperative and longer-term outcomes for a remedial OMB after a failed intraluminal stent or previous open bypass appear to be comparable to a P-OMB. These findings support the recently updated clinical practice guideline recommendations for an endovascular-first approach to treating recurrent CMI due to the significant perioperative complication risk of OMB. However, among the subset of patients deemed ineligible for endoluminal reconstruction after failed mesenteric revascularization, R-OMB results appear to be acceptable and highlight the utility of this strategy in selected patients.

Safety, Efficacy and Outcome of Rotational Thrombectomy assisted Endovascular Revascularisation of the Superior Mesenteric Artery in Acute Thromboembolic Mesenteric Ischaemia.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of percutaneous rotational thrombectomy-assisted endovascular revascularization of acute thromboembolic superior mesenteric artery occlusions in acute mesenteric ischemia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifteen cases of percutaneous rotational thrombectomy- assisted (Rotarex S, BD, USA) revascularization were retrospectively analyzed. The etiology was embolic in 40 % of cases and thrombotic in 60 %. A "Thrombectomy in Visceral Ischemia" (TIVI) 5-point score determined vessel patency at presentation, after percutaneous rotational thrombectomy, and after adjunctive technologies. TIVI 3 indicated nearly complete revascularization (minimal residual side branch thrombus). TIVI 4 indicated complete revascularization. Technical success was defined as successful device application and a final TIVI score of 3/4 after adjunctive technologies. Safety and outcome were also analyzed. RESULTS: Device application via femoral access was feasible in 100 % of cases and improved flow in 86.7 % of cases (1â€Š× TIVI 0→1, 11â€Š× TIVI 0→2, 1â€Š× TIVI 1→2). There was no change in 13.3 % of cases (2â€Š× TIVI 2→2). Additional devices resulted in further flow improvement in 93.3 % of cases (8â€Š× TIVI 3, 6â€Š× TIVI 4). One recanalization failed (TIVI 2→2→2). After adjunctive technologies (10â€Š× manual aspiration, 11â€Š× angioplasty, 9â€Š× stenting), the technical success rate was 93.3 %. The mean procedure time was 40.5(±â€Š14) minutes for embolism and 72.1(±â€Š20) minutes for thrombosis. There was one device-related major complication (catheter tip fracture) resulting in a device-related safety rate of 93.3 %. The overall major complication rate was 20 %. Surgical exploration (13 ×), bowel resection (9 ×) and Fogarty embolectomy/bypass (3 ×) were also performed. The 30-day mortality rate was 40 %. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous rotational thrombectomy is an effective adjunct for rapid endovascular recanalization of acute thromboembolic superior mesenteric artery occlusions with an acceptable rate of major procedural complications. KEY POINTS: · Percutaneous rotational thrombectomy-assisted superior mesenteric artery revascularization in acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia is feasible and effective.. · Percutaneous rotational thrombectomy facilitates rapid flow restoration in native and stented superior mesenteric artery segments.. · Brachial access should be considered in the case of steep take-off angles of the superior mesenteric artery..

Factors that may affect the outcome of acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia. A single-center study.

BACKGROUND: Acute mesenteric ischemia is a rare but lethal disease. Acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia consists of mesenteric artery embolism, mesenteric artery thrombosis, and mesenteric vein thrombosis. This study aimed to investigate the factors that may affect the outcome of acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia. METHODS: Data from acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia patients admitted between May 2016 and May 2022 were reviewed retrospectively. Patients were divided into 2 groups according to whether complications(Clavien‒Dindo ≥ 2) occurred within 6 months of the first admission. Demographics, symptoms, signs, laboratory results, computed tomography angiography features, management and outcomes were analyzed. RESULTS: 59 patients were enrolled in this study. Complications(Clavien‒Dindo ≥ 2) occurred within 6 months of the first admission in 17 patients. Transmural intestinal necrosis, peritonitis, white blood cell count, percentage of neutrophils, percentage of lymphocytes, neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio, lactate dehydrogenase, creatine kinase isoenzyme, cardiac troponin I, laparoscopic exploration rate, open embolectomy rate, enterostomy rate, length of necrotic small bowel, length of healthy small bowel, surgical time and intraoperative blood loss differed significantly between groups. Creatine kinase isoenzyme (OR = 1.415, 95% CI: 1.060-1.888) and surgical time (OR = 1.014, 95% CI: 1.001-1.026) were independent risk factors associated with complications(Clavien‒Dindo ≥ 2). CONCLUSIONS: Our analysis suggests that acute occlusive mesenteric ischemia patients with a creatine kinase isoenzyme level greater than 2.22 ng/mL or a surgical time longer than 156 min are more likely to experience complications'(Clavien‒Dindo ≥ 2) occurrence within 6 months of the first admission.

Impact of Patient and Procedural Factors on Outcomes Following Mesenteric Bypass.

BACKGROUND: Mesenteric bypass (MB) for patients with acute (AMI) and chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is associated with cardiovascular (CV) and pulmonary morbidity. METHODS: Patients with AMI and CMI from 2008 to 2019 were identified to determine independent predictors of CV (cardiac arrest, MI, DVT, and stroke) and pulmonary (pneumonia and ventilator time>48 h) morbidities in patients undergoing MB. RESULTS: 377 patients were identified. Patients with AMI had higher rates of preoperative SIRS/sepsis (28 vs 12%, P < .0001), were more likely to be ASA class 4/5 (55 vs 42%, P = .005), were more likely to require bowel resection (19 vs 3%, P < .0001), and were more likely to have vein utilized as their bypass conduit (30 vs 14%, P < .0001). There were no differences in use of aortic or iliac inflow (P = .707) nor in return to the OR (24 vs 19%, P = .282). Both postoperative sepsis (12 vs 2.6%, P = .003) and mortality (31.4% vs 9.8%, P < .0001) were significantly increased in patients with AMI. After adjusting for both patient and procedural factors, multivariable logistic regression (MLR) identified international normalized ratio (INR) (OR 3.16; 95% CI 1.56-6.40, P = .001) and chronic heart failure (CHF) (OR 5.88; 95% CI 1.15-29.97, P = .033) to be independent predictors of pulmonary morbidity, while preoperative sepsis (OR 1.96; 95% CI 1.45-2.66, P < .0001) alone was predictive of CV morbidity in all patients undergoing MB. DISCUSSION: Mesenteric bypass for mesenteric ischemia leads to high rates of morbidity and mortality, whether done in an acute or chronic setting. Preoperative sepsis, independent of AMI or CMI, predicts CV morbidity, regardless of bypass configuration or conduit, while elevated INR or underlying CHF carries a higher risk of pulmonary morbidity.

Outcomes of open revascularization for chronic mesenteric ischemia at a tertiary care center in India.

OBJECTIVE: Chronic mesenteric ischemia (CMI) is a rare, debilitating disease associated with higher morbidity and mortality if not treated on time. In the past two decades, there has been a paradigm shift in its management with endovascular modality due to reduced perioperative morbidity and mortality. In the endovascular era, only a few patients require surgical therapy. We conducted this study to report our experience with open surgical revascularization at our hospital. METHODS: We have conducted a retrospective study after obtaining approval from Institutional Ethics Committee. Data regarding patients who underwent open revascularization for CMI with long-segment occlusion from 2016 to 2021 has been retrieved from the institutional database. The demographic data, clinical presentation, type of surgery and graft used, perioperative mortality and morbidity and length of hospital stay were evaluated. Overall survival and disease-free survival were assessed using Kaplan-Meier analysis. RESULTS: Twenty-one patients underwent open surgical revascularization; 16 were males and five females. The median age was 43 years. Fourteen (66.7%) were smokers. The mean duration of follow-up was 28.4 ± 13.6 months. Thirty-day postoperative mortality was 0% and morbidity was 28%. The average duration of hospital stay and postoperative weight gain were 6.9 ± 3.7 days and 11 ± 4.9 kgs, respectively. One patient died at two years of follow-up due to myocardial infarction and one had a recurrence. Long-term survival at 60 months of follow-up was 91.6% and the primary-patency rate was 95.2%. CONCLUSION: Owing to better long-term and reintervention-free patency, open revascularization should be considered in patients who are fit for surgery, particularly in patients with long-segment mesenteric artery occlusion.

Open revascularization in a patient with chronic mesenteric ischemia and a history of aorto-bifemoral bypass - a case report.

INTRODUCTION: This case report describes surgical treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia in a polymorbid patient with the history of an aorto-bifemoral bypass implant. CASE REPORT: The patient suffered from chronic occlusions of the mesenteric arteries. He experienced postprandial pain and significant weight loss. Endovascular repair of the occlusions failed. Open single retrograde bypass from the left branch of the aorto-bifemoral graft to the superior mesenteric artery was implanted successfully. CONCLUSION: The discussion briefly mentions current trends in the treatment of chronic mesenteric ischemia. Despite the development of interventional radiology, surgical treatment remains a relevant alternative for the management of chronic mesenteric ischemia.

Successful clinical management of mesenteric ischemia caused by superior mesenteric artery obstruction and celiac artery stenosis: a case report.

Acute mesenteric ischemia (AMI) is a rare, yet deadly thromboembolic accident that requires urgent surgery and or revascularization. We report the case of a 67-year-old male patient, who presented with severe abdominal pain and reduced oral intake, causing dehydration and impaired kidney function. The imaging evaluation including arterial Doppler and computed tomography (CT) scan showed AMI caused by superior mesenteric artery (SMA) obstruction and celiac artery stenosis, besides multiple atherosclerotic segments. Given the absence of guidelines in such an uncommon combination, a multidisciplinary management was initiated involving general medicine, general surgery, vascular surgery, and radiology. The agreed plan consisted of anticoagulation, exploratory laparotomy with necrosis resection and anastomosis, followed by percutaneous thrombectomy and angioplasty with stenting. The patient was discharged on day 7 postop with a highly satisfactory outcome and follow up. This case highlights the value of an early multidisciplinary approach in tailoring the management to the specific case of AMI.

Review article: Acute superior mesenteric vessel ischaemia: A review of clinical practice and biomarkers.

A patient with acute occlusion of the superior mesenteric vessels resulting in superior mesenteric vessel ischaemia (SMVI) who presents to the ED with abdominal pain and unremarkable abdominal examination risks delay in diagnosis and treatment with adverse outcome. A comprehensive literature search was performed, and the evidence was reviewed. To-date, there are no accurate biomarkers of SMVI and so, heightened awareness among ED staff and rapidly actioning diagnostic imaging and surgical referral will help fast-track the patient with SMVI to surgical management. Management of SMVI is challenging and requires ongoing communication. Prompt surgical intervention may help reduce mortality and morbidity in SMVI. SMVI is associated with significant mortality and morbidity. With the lack of accurate biomarkers, diagnosis and management is challenging and requires heightened awareness among ED staff for prompt surgical referral and intervention.