Ophthalmologists' perspectives on corneal transplantation and donation: a survey from Türkiye.

PURPOSE: To evaluate ophthalmologists' interest and opinions regarding corneal transplantation and donation in Türkiye. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An online questionnaire was prepared using Google Forms, and the electronic link to this questionnaire was sent via WhatsApp to ophthalmologists working in Türkiye. Eighteen open-ended/multiple-choice questions were asked about ophthalmologists' demographic information and their opinions regarding corneal transplantation and donation. The answers were analyzed by transferring the data to Excel. RESULTS: A total of 195 ophthalmologists participated in the survey. While 68.6% of them stated that they wanted to donate their corneas, 21.1% stated that they were undecided, and 10.3% did not want to donate their corneas. While 93.8% of the participants agreed to have a cornea transplant in case of need, 5.7% of them stated that they were undecided, and 0.5% said that they would not accept a cornea transplant. The most frequent (90.5%) reason for being willing to donate one's cornea was to give hope to patients with low vision. The most frequent (46.2%) reason for not wanting to donate one's cornea was the unwillingness to have one's body/eye integrity impaired. The vast majority (80.8%) of the participants thought that there was not enough corneal donation in Türkiye and that this was mostly (85.9%) due to cultural and/or religious reasons. CONCLUSIONS: Even in a sample with a high level of education and the most knowledge about corneal transplantation, the willingness to donate corneas may remain below the expected rates. Therefore, it is necessary to alleviate unrealistic concerns and prejudices about corneal donation and transplantation.

The output of cataract surgery performed by trained non-ophthalmologist physicians in rural areas: study of cataract outcomes and up-take of services report 7.

BACKGROUND: Cataract is the leading cause of blindness worldwide and surgery can restore vision in most patients. Some patients have little access to surgical services due to lack of cataract surgeons and the unaffordable costs. In 2005 we built a service model that trained rural non-ophthalmologist physicians to perform cataract surgeries in rural China. This study evaluates the long-term impacts of this model. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective cohort study to analyze patients' hand-written medical records and electronic outpatient record between January 2005 and December 2019 at two rural health clinics in Southern China. RESULTS: In total, 34,601 patients (49,942 eyes) underwent cataract surgery by non-ophthalmologist physicians from 2005 to 2019.Visual acuity was clearly documented in 38,251 eyes. Before surgery, the unaided distance visual acuity (UDVA) of 60.7% (23,205/38,251) eyes was less than 0.05 decimal. On the first day after surgery, the percentage of UDVA < 0.05 eyes was reduced to 6.0%, and 96.7% (36,980/38,251) of the eyes achieved a better UDVA compared to pre-operation. Surgical-related complications occurred in 218 eyes. The most common complication was posterior capsule rupture (114, 0.23%). 44.3% (15,341/34,601) of the patients chose to have a second eye cataract surgery (SECS) in the same clinic. At one of the outpatient clinics, 21,595 patients received basic eye care apart from cataract surgery between 2018 and 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Non-ophthalmologist physicians trained for cataract surgeries in rural clinics can improve cataract related visual acuity and basic eye care to the local population.

Improve the efficiency and accuracy of ophthalmologists' clinical decision-making based on AI technology.

BACKGROUND: As global aging intensifies, the prevalence of ocular fundus diseases continues to rise. In China, the tense doctor-patient ratio poses numerous challenges for the early diagnosis and treatment of ocular fundus diseases. To reduce the high risk of missed or misdiagnosed cases, avoid irreversible visual impairment for patients, and ensure good visual prognosis for patients with ocular fundus diseases, it is particularly important to enhance the growth and diagnostic capabilities of junior doctors. This study aims to leverage the value of electronic medical record data to developing a diagnostic intelligent decision support platform. This platform aims to assist junior doctors in diagnosing ocular fundus diseases quickly and accurately, expedite their professional growth, and prevent delays in patient treatment. An empirical evaluation will assess the platform's effectiveness in enhancing doctors' diagnostic efficiency and accuracy. METHODS: In this study, eight Chinese Named Entity Recognition (NER) models were compared, and the SoftLexicon-Glove-Word2vec model, achieving a high F1 score of 93.02%, was selected as the optimal recognition tool. This model was then used to extract key information from electronic medical records (EMRs) and generate feature variables based on diagnostic rule templates. Subsequently, an XGBoost algorithm was employed to construct an intelligent decision support platform for diagnosing ocular fundus diseases. The effectiveness of the platform in improving diagnostic efficiency and accuracy was evaluated through a controlled experiment comparing experienced and junior doctors. RESULTS: The use of the diagnostic intelligent decision support platform resulted in significant improvements in both diagnostic efficiency and accuracy for both experienced and junior doctors (P < 0.05). Notably, the gap in diagnostic speed and precision between junior doctors and experienced doctors narrowed considerably when the platform was used. Although the platform also provided some benefits to experienced doctors, the improvement was less pronounced compared to junior doctors. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic intelligent decision support platform established in this study, based on the XGBoost algorithm and NER, effectively enhances the diagnostic efficiency and accuracy of junior doctors in ocular fundus diseases. This has significant implications for optimizing clinical diagnosis and treatment.

Timely care for age-related macular degeneration: a qualitative study among retina specialists in Israel.

BACKGROUND: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) affects quality of life and independence, and its incidence and prevalence are increasing due to ageing of the population. Access to effective timely treatment can improve vision and reduce incidence of blindness. This study aimed to explore the perspectives of ophthalmologists in the Israeli public healthcare system regarding timely treatment of AMD patients. METHODS: Qualitative semi-structured interviews were conducted in 2020-2021 with 22 senior ophthalmologists, from 10 general hospitals and from two HMOs, representing different geographic regions. All interviewees specialize in retinal diseases and work with AMD patients. Interviews discussed patient pathways involved in the diagnosis and treatment of AMD, access to care, and obstacles to timely care. Thematic analysis was conducted. RESULTS: Based on the interviews, we describe the usual referral and treatment pathways. Themes included regional disparities, long wait times in some areas, a lack of retina specialists, differences in referral pathways, inappropriate use of emergency department to obtain timely treatment, and second-line treatment not fully covered by insurance, most affecting the weakest segments of the population. CONCLUSIONS: Loss of vision incurs high health and societal costs. In the context of insufficient medical manpower in Israel, the healthcare system will need to assess future resources to cope with accumulating burden of AMD cases over time in an ageing population. Precise referral information, and simultaneous referral to imaging and retinal clinics, may minimize delays in treatment. Awareness of AMD symptoms and the importance of early intervention could be highlighted by campaigns, particularly among high-risk groups. HIGHLIGHTS: • Interviews with hospital-based and community ophthalmologists showed regional disparities in AMD treatment, with long wait times and a lack of retina specialists in some areas. • Differences in referral pathways, inappropriate use of emergency department to obtain timely treatment, and second line treatment not fully covered by insurance were highlighted. • The healthcare system will need to assess future resources to cope with accumulating burden of AMD cases over time in an ageing population • Precise referral information, and simultaneous referral to imaging and retinal clinics, may minimize delays in treatment. • Awareness of AMD symptoms and the importance of early intervention should be emphasized in high-risk groups.

Bridging gaps in ophthalmology residency programs: the link between practice, training and confidence in ocular examination and gonioscopy for diagnosing glaucoma, a blinding disease.

BACKGROUND: To evaluate real-world utilization of gonioscopy for diagnosing glaucoma among ophthalmologists with diverse subspecialties, and understand current perceptions of teaching, training, and confidence in gonioscopy. METHODS: A nationwide anonymous online survey was conducted among practicing ophthalmologists, querying about demographics, professional experience, practice of routine ocular examination for glaucoma and perceptions of confidence in performing them. RESULTS: 136 ophthalmologists participated in the survey, with various levels of experience from residency to over twenty years of ophthalmology practice. Glaucoma specialists comprised 23 (16.9%) of the participants. Of the non-glaucoma-specialist respondents, only 33 (29.2%) expressed being highly confident in interpreting gonioscopic findings, which correlated significantly with their self-reported inadequate level of training in gonioscopy during residency (p < 0.001) and even more so with their low frequency of implementing gonioscopy in routine examinations (p < 0.001). The commonly cited reasons for the low practice of gonioscopy were insufficient time allotted to examinations and lack of experience, knowledge or equipment. CONCLUSIONS: Gonioscopy is fundamental to the detection of glaucoma. This study reveals underutilization of gonioscopy in the practice of ophthalmology and its association with lower training opportunities, calling for expedited changes in the residency's curriculum, alongside measures to promote its use in clinical practice.

What are the experiences of teleophthalmology in optometric referral pathways? A qualitative interview study with patients and clinicians.

OBJECTIVE: Implementing teleophthalmology into the optometric referral pathway may ease the current pressures on hospital eye services caused by over-referrals from some optometrists. This study aimed to understand the practical implications of implementing teleophthalmology by analysing lived experiences and perceptions of teleophthalmology in the optometric referral pathway for suspected retinal conditions. DESIGN: Qualitative in-depth interview study SETTING: Fourteen primary care optometry practices and four secondary care hospital eye services from four NHS Foundation Trusts across the UK. PARTICIPANTS: We interviewed 41 participants: patients (17), optometrists (18), and ophthalmologists (6) who were involved in the HERMES study. Through thematic analysis, we collated and present their experiences of implementing teleophthalmology. RESULTS: All participants interviewed were positive towards teleophthalmology as it could enable efficiencies in the referral pathway and improve feedback and communication between patients and healthcare professionals. Concerns included setup costs for optometrists and anxieties from patients about not seeing an ophthalmologist face to face. However, reducing unnecessary visits and increasing the availability of resources and capacity were seen as significant benefits. CONCLUSIONS: Overall, we report positive experiences of implementing teleophthalmology into the optometric referral pathway for suspected retinal conditions. Successful implementation will require appropriate investment to set up and integrate new technology and remunerate services, and continued evaluation to ensure timely feedback to patients and between healthcare professionals is received. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ISRCTN18106677.

[Four perspectives on Graves' orbitopathy - from the point of view of the patient, general practitioner, endocrinologist, and ophthalmologist]. / Endokrin oftalmopati ur fyra olika perspektiv.

Graves' orbitopathy is a common complication of Graves' disease. The mild form dominates, whereas moderate to severe and sight threatening forms are rarer. They require quick, adequate care, involving cooperation between county hospitals and the regional hospital, and adequate diagnostics and choice of treatments of treatments. A new national guideline for hyperthyroidism has been published in Sweden in January 2023, where these aspects are highlighted. The present guideline requires implementation regionally, as all components are not in place, but reflects the needs of patients. This article highlights important aspects for patients such as information, to be listened to, accessibility and adequate care, but also defines actions necessary in primary care where patients most often seek help at first. Lastly, important medical and practical aspects are reviewed by the endocrinologist and the ophthalmologist.

Ergonomic benefit using heads-up display compared to conventional surgical microscope in Japanese ophthalmologists.

PURPOSE: Occupational musculoskeletal disorders are prevalent in ophthalmic surgeons and can impact surgeons' well-being and productivity. Heads-up displays may reduce ergonomic stress compared to conventional microscopes. This cross-sectional, non-interventional study compared ergonomic experience between heads-up display and conventional ocular microscopes. METHODS: The study protocol was approved by the independent ethics committee and nonprofit organization MINS Institutional Review Board. An online questionnaire was distributed to a sample of ophthalmic surgeons in Japan with experience operating with heads-up display. The questionnaire captured surgeon-specific variables, the standardized Nordic Musculoskeletal Questionnaire, and custom questions to compare heads-up display and conventional microscope and understand long-term impacts of musculoskeletal disorders. RESULTS: Analysis was conducted on responses from 67 surgeons with a mean 25 years of practice and 2.7 years using heads-up display. Many surgeons agreed or strongly agreed that heads-up display reduced the severity (40%) and frequency (40%) of pain and discomfort, improved posture (61%), and improved overall comfort (61%). Of respondents who experienced asthenopia (n = 59) or pain/discomfort during operation (n = 61), 54% reported improvement in asthenopia and 72% reported feeling less pain/discomfort since using heads-up display. Overall, 69% reported preference for heads-up display. CONCLUSION: This study provides novel data on musculoskeletal disorders and the long-term impacts of ergonomic strain reported by ophthalmologists building on existing literature demonstrating ergonomic and other advantages of heads-up display. Future studies with objective ergonomic assessment are warranted to validate these findings.

Pilot study of musculoskeletal pain in ophthalmologists following participation in a fifteen-minute online Iyengar yoga program.

Purpose: To evaluate the prevalence of musculoskeletal (MSK) complaints in ophthalmologists and to assess whether participation in an online Iyengar yoga video program improves the baseline pain scores and awareness of proper posture in the clinic and operating room. Methods: Ophthalmologists were recruited from online professional forums for this nonrandomized, prospective study. A pre-intervention survey, including demographics, office and procedure volumes, wellness activities, and baseline MSK pain scores, was completed. A fifteen-minute instructional video focusing on simple yoga poses for the neck, shoulder, and lower back created by one of the authors, who is both an ophthalmologist and a certified Iyengar yoga teacher, was provided to participants to complete three times weekly for a total of 4 weeks. A post-intervention survey collecting MSK pain scores and information about ergonomics and compliance was completed. Results: Fifty ophthalmologists completed the pre-intervention survey, of whom 49 (98%) reported at least 1 episode of MSK discomfort in the preceding year. Of those, discomfort was cervical in 36 (72%), in the shoulder(s) in 15 (29%), thoracic spinal in 23 (46%), lumbar spinal in 23 (46%), and centered in the wrist, hand, or finger in 22 (44%). Of the 50 ophthalmologists, 22 submitted the post-intervention surveys. The post-intervention pain scores were decreased compared to baseline for cervical spine (P < 0.01), shoulder (P < 0.01), thoracic spine (P < 0.01), lumbar spine (P < 0.01) and wrist, hand, or finger (P < 0.01). 20 respondents (91%) reported improved awareness of their posture in the clinic and operating room, and 19 (86%) felt that this awareness would decrease their MSK symptoms. Conclusions: Among our small group of survey respondents, a fifteen-minute Iyengar yoga video program specifically designed for ophthalmologists reduced MSK pain and improving awareness of proper ergonomics for practicing ophthalmologists.

Development and validation of a health practitioner survey on ocular allergy.

Survey studies have played a significant role in understanding the gaps in the knowledge and practices of health practitioners. However, there have been no such survey studies on Ocular Allergy (OA). Thus, the purpose of this study was to develop and validate a survey on OA to better understand the gaps in the diagnostic, treatment, and collaborative care approaches of health practitioners in OA. The survey is titled "Survey on Ocular Allergy for Health Practitioners (SOAHP)". SOAHP was developed in a five-stage process. First, item extraction via the use of a literature review, second, face and content validity, third, a pilot study, fourth, test-retest reliability, and fifth, finalisation of the survey. 65 items under 6 domains were initially generated in the item extraction phase. Content validity was conducted on 15 experts in the field. This was conducted twice to reach consensus whereby items and domains were added, edited, kept, or removed, resulting in 50 items under 7 domains. The pilot study was conducted on 15 participants from the five relevant health practitioner fields (Allergists/Immunologists, General Practitioners (GPs), Ophthalmologists, Optometrists and Pharmacists). This altered the survey further to 40 items under 7 domains. Test-retest reliability was conducted on 25 participants from the five health practitioner fields. Reliability was moderate to almost perfect for most (97%) investigated items. The finalised survey was 40 items under 7 domains. SOAHP is the first survey created to assess diagnostic, treatment and collaborative care approaches of Allergists/Immunologists, GPs, Ophthalmologists, Optometrists and Pharmacists on OA. SOAHP will be a useful tool in clinical research on OA.

Patient-Reported Dry Eye Treatment and Burden of Care.

OBJECTIVES: Dry eye is a common condition that can decrease the quality of life. This survey-based study of persons with dry eye investigated self-reported treatments (initial, current), out-of-pocket expenses, time spent on self-management, sources of care, and sources of information about their condition. METHODS: Online dry eye newsletters and support groups were emailed a link to an electronic survey asking members to participate. Survey respondents were not required to answer every question. RESULTS: In total, 639 persons with self-reported dry eye responded (86% women, 14% men [n=623]; mean ± SD age, 55 ± 14 years [n=595]). Artificial tears were the most reported intervention (76% initially, 71% currently). The median (interquartile range) out-of-pocket treatment cost annually was $500 ($200-$1,320 [n=506]). In addition, 55% (n=544) estimated 5 to 20 min daily on self-management; 22% spent an hour or more. Ophthalmologists provided most dry eye care (67%, n=520). Only 48% (n=524) reported that their primary source of dry eye information came from their eye care clinician. CONCLUSIONS: Artificial tears are the primary treatment for dry eye. Ophthalmologists provide most dry eye care, but half of patients report that their eye care provider is not their primary source of information. Almost one fourth of patients spend an hour or more daily on treatments.

Access to Pediatric Eye Care by Practitioner Type, Geographic Distribution, and US Population Demographics.

Importance: Investigating disparities in service coverage of pediatric optometrists and pediatric ophthalmologists in relation to patient demographics will illuminate vulnerable populations and inform future interventions. Objective: To characterize the geographic distribution of pediatric eye care practitioners and analyze its association with population demographics. Design, Setting, and Participants: In this cross-sectional study, 4 public databases were used to identify the addresses of pediatric optometrists and pediatric ophthalmologists in the US in April 2023. Addresses were geocoded, and population demographic data were collected. Pediatric optometrists and pediatric ophthalmologists listed in the public databases, as well as respondents to the 2020 US census, were included in this study. Data were analyzed from April to July 2023. Exposures: Public databases and US census data of eye practitioners and their practice locations. Main Outcomes and Measures: Geographic distribution of pediatric optometrists and pediatric ophthalmologists as listed in public databases and correlations between service coverage and US population demographics. Results: A total of 586 pediatric optometrists (302 female [51.5%]) and 1060 pediatric ophthalmologists (590 male [55.7%]) were identified. Among US counties, 203 (6.5%) had at least 1 pediatric optometrist, and 308 (9.7%) had at least 1 pediatric ophthalmologist, showing substantial geographic overlap (odds ratio, 12.7; 95% CI, 9.4-17.4; P < .001). In the 2834 counties without pediatric ophthalmologists, 2731 (96.4%) lacked pediatric optometrists. There were more pediatric ophthalmologists per million people (3.3) compared with pediatric optometrists per million people (2.5) across all states (difference, 0.8; 95% CI, 0-1.9; P = .047). Among counties with practitioners, the median (IQR) number of pediatric optometrists per million people was 7.8 (0.4-245.0), surpassing the median (IQR) number of pediatric ophthalmologists per million people, 5.5 (1.0-117.0). Counties with pediatric ophthalmologists had higher mean (SD) household incomes than counties with pediatric optometrists ($76 126.87 [$21 879.23] vs $68 681.77 [$18 336.40]; difference, -$7445.10; 95% CI, $2519.51-$12 370.69; P = .003) and higher mean (SD) population with bachelor's degrees than counties with pediatric optometrists (79 016 [82 503] vs 23 076 [44 025]; difference, -55 940; 95% CI, -73 035 to -38 845; P < .001), whereas counties with neither specialist type had the lowest mean (SD) household income ($57 714.03 [$2731.00] vs $78 388.67 [$18 499.21]; difference, -$20 675.00; 95% CI, -$21 550.90 to -$19 799.10; P < .001) and mean (SD) population with bachelor's degrees (5113 [12 875] vs 167 015 [216 486]; difference, -161 902; 95% CI, -170 388.9 to -153 415.1; P < .001) compared with counties with practitioners. Conclusions and Relevance: Geographic disparities in pediatric eye care access, compounded by socioeconomic differences, underscore the urgency of augmenting practitioner support in underserved areas.

Cognitive bias evaluation on the choice of treatment in common retinal disorders among retina specialists in 2023.

PURPOSE: The study aimed to discern the intent to treat with the therapeutic agents prescribed first or second line in the following eye conditions: neovascular age-related macular Degeneration (nAMD), diabetic macular edema (DME), retinal vein occlusion (RVO), and myopic maculopathy with choroidal neovascularization (MMNV). The study also aimed to distinguish the ophthalmologists' intended treatment for their patients from those that they would prescribe for themselves if they were affected by the above macular conditions. METHODS: The study utilized an online survey of 243 French ophthalmologists practicing medical retina, with males accounting for 54.3% of the participants. Data was obtained using a questionnaire that focused on the ophthalmologists' experience with various agents as well as their first and second line choices for nAMD, DME, RVO, and MMNV. RESULTS: The vast majority of French ophthalmologists (99%) had experience with the most widely used anti-vascular endothelial growth factors (anti-VEGFs); ranibizumab, bevacizumab, and aflibercept. Fewer than 8% reported experience with anti-VEGF drug reservoirs, biosimilars, or faricimab. The study findings also showed ranibizumab and aflibercept as the commonly prescribed first line choices for the above-mentioned ocular conditions. For the second line choice, the study showed that aflibercept and dexamethasone intravitreal implants were the most common across the four retinal conditions studied. The only difference in intent to treat for "patients" versus "yourself" was for biosimilars (0% to 0.8%, P=0.001). CONCLUSION: The findings regarding the first and second line choices for the mentioned ocular disorders were found to agree with the findings of published literature currently used in practice, with a tendency to prefer ranibizumab as first line therapy for neovascular disorders and aflibercept as first line therapy for macular edema. In addition, there were no differences between choices for first and second line therapy for patients vs. ophthalmologists.

A Preliminary Evaluation of the Diagnostic Performance of a Smartphone-Based Machine Learning-Assisted System for Evaluation of Clinical Activity Score in Digital Images of Thyroid-Associated Orbitopathy.

Background: We previously developed a machine learning (ML)-assisted system for predicting the clinical activity score (CAS) in thyroid-associated orbitopathy (TAO) using digital facial images taken by a digital single-lens reflex camera in a studio setting. In this study, we aimed to apply this system to smartphones and detect active TAO (CAS ≥3) using facial images captured by smartphone cameras. We evaluated the performance of our system on various smartphone models and compared it with the performance of ophthalmologists with varying clinical experience. Methods: We applied the preexisting ML architecture to classify photos taken with smartphones (Galaxy S21 Ultra, iPhone 12 pro, iPhone 11, iPhone SE 2020, Galaxy M20, and Galaxy A21S). The performance was evaluated with smartphone-captured images from 100 patients with TAO. Three ophthalmology residents, three general ophthalmologists with <5 years of clinical experience, and three oculoplastic specialists independently interpreted the same set of images taken under a studio environment and compared their results with those generated by the smartphone-based ML-assisted system. Reference CAS was determined by a consensus of three oculoplastic specialists. Results: Active TAO (CAS ≥3) was identified in 28 patients. Smartphone model used in capturing facial images influenced active TAO detection performance (F1 score 0.59-0.72). The smartphone-based system showed 74.5% sensitivity, 84.8% specificity, and F1 score 0.70 on top three smartphones. On images from all six smartphones, average sensitivity, specificity, and F1 score were 71.4%, 81.6%, and 0.66, respectively. Ophthalmology residents' values were 69.1%, 55.1%, and 0.46. General ophthalmologists' values were 61.9%, 79.6%, and 0.55. Oculoplastic specialists' values were 73.8%, 90.7%, and 0.75. This smartphone-based ML-assisted system predicted CAS within 1 point of reference CAS in 90.7% using facial images from smartphones. Conclusions: Our smartphone-based ML-assisted system shows reasonable accuracy in detecting active TAO, comparable with oculoplastic specialists and outperforming residents and general ophthalmologists. It may enable reliable self-monitoring for disease activity, but confirmatory research is needed for clinical application.

A Chinese survey of clinical practice on the management of thyroid eye disease.

Objective: The management of thyroid eye disease (TED) has undergone significant changes for decades. The study sought to investigate current clinical practice on the management of TED in China. Methods: An online questionnaire survey was conducted from April to May 2023. The questionnaire involved diagnostic criteria for TED, multidisciplinary treatment (MDT) collaboration, and treatment preference for mild, moderate, and severe TED. Results: A total of 289 questionnaires were collected, with 165 from endocrinologists and 124 from ophthalmologists. Only 36.7% of participants claimed there was an MDT clinical pattern for TED in their institutions. The coverage of biological agents was around 10% or lower. These were distinctly lower than in Western countries. About 62.6% of participants believed the incidence of TED has increased in recent years. Imaging techniques were used widely to assist in the diagnosis of TED. However, there was still controversy regarding the definition of proptosis in the Chinese population. Most doctors managed risk factors and provided orbital supportive treatments of artificial tears and glasses. For mild active TED, endocrinologists (39.4%) were inclined to recommend therapy for hyperthyroidism alone, while ophthalmologists (43.6%) preferred orbital corticosteroid injections. Currently, the most widely used treatment for moderate to severe active TED was high-dose intravenous corticosteroid (94.8%), while orbital radiotherapy combined with immunosuppressive agents was the most recognized second-line therapy (43.6%). Conclusion: The study documented the consistency and differences between current clinical practices in the management of TED in China and the recently updated guidelines. There was a remarkable difference between ophthalmology and endocrinology departments, warranting management optimization.

Diagnostic Imaging for Retinoblastoma Cancer Staging: Guide for Providing Essential Insights for Ophthalmologists and Oncologists.

Retinoblastoma is the most common cause of all intraocular pediatric malignancies. It is caused by the loss of RB1 tumor suppressor gene function, although some tumors occur due to MYCN oncogene amplification with normal RB1 genes. Nearly half of all retinoblastomas occur due to a hereditary germline RB1 pathogenic variant, most of which manifest with bilateral tumors. This germline RB1 mutation also predisposes to intracranial midline embryonal tumors. Accurate staging of retinoblastoma is crucial in providing optimal vision-, eye-, and life-saving treatment. The AJCC Cancer Staging Manual has undergone significant changes, resulting in a universally accepted system with a multidisciplinary approach for managing retinoblastoma. The authors discuss the role of MRI and other diagnostic imaging techniques in the pretreatment assessment and staging of retinoblastoma. A thorough overview of the prevailing imaging standards and evidence-based perspectives on the benefits and drawbacks of these techniques is provided. Published under a CC BY 4.0 license. Test Your Knowledge questions for this article are available in the supplemental material.

Ophthalmologists' assessment of the handling characteristics of the novel Finesse Reflex Handle in comparison to those of a conventional handle.

Internal limiting membrane (ILM) peeling requires a delicate handling technique. It is also important that ophthalmologists can use the ILM forceps handle of their preference. This study objectively and subjectively evaluated the handling of the novel Finesse Reflex Handle (Reflex) in comparison with that of a conventional handle. The force required to close the forceps tips, evaluated using a digital force gauge, was significantly lesser for Reflex than for the conventional handle (3.14 ± 0.09 N vs. 3.84 ± 0.06 N, P < 0.001). Twenty-one ophthalmologists with various levels of experience answered a questionnaire after using both handles, and the total questionnaire score for Reflex was higher than that for the conventional handle (35.0 ± 3.7 vs. 30.0 ± 6.9, P = 0.01). Furthermore, the duration of experience as an ophthalmologist was negatively correlated with the vertical motion, assessed by video analysis, for the conventional handle (P = 0.02, r = - 0.50) but not for Reflex (P = 0.26). In conclusion, objective and subjective analyses revealed that compared with the conventional handle, the novel Reflex handle had more favourable handling characteristics. Most ophthalmologists preferred the handling of Reflex. Reflex may compensate for a lack of surgical experience.

Evaluating the accuracy of the Ophthalmologist Robot for multiple blindness-causing eye diseases: a multicentre, prospective study protocol.

INTRODUCTION: Early eye screening and treatment can reduce the incidence of blindness by detecting and addressing eye diseases at an early stage. The Ophthalmologist Robot is an automated device that can simultaneously capture ocular surface and fundus images without the need for ophthalmologists, making it highly suitable for primary application. However, the accuracy of the device's screening capabilities requires further validation. This study aims to evaluate and compare the screening accuracies of ophthalmologists and deep learning models using images captured by the Ophthalmologist Robot, in order to identify a screening method that is both highly accurate and cost-effective. Our findings may provide valuable insights into the potential applications of remote eye screening. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, prospective study that will recruit approximately 1578 participants from 3 hospitals. All participants will undergo ocular surface and fundus images taken by the Ophthalmologist Robot. Additionally, 695 participants will have their ocular surface imaged with a slit lamp. Relevant information from outpatient medical records will be collected. The primary objective is to evaluate the accuracy of ophthalmologists' screening for multiple blindness-causing eye diseases using device images through receiver operating characteristic curve analysis. The targeted diseases include keratitis, corneal scar, cataract, diabetic retinopathy, age-related macular degeneration, glaucomatous optic neuropathy and pathological myopia. The secondary objective is to assess the accuracy of deep learning models in disease screening. Furthermore, the study aims to compare the consistency between the Ophthalmologist Robot and the slit lamp in screening for keratitis and corneal scar using the Kappa test. Additionally, the cost-effectiveness of three eye screening methods, based on non-telemedicine screening, ophthalmologist-telemedicine screening and artificial intelligence-telemedicine screening, will be assessed by constructing Markov models. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study has obtained approval from the ethics committee of the Ophthalmology and Optometry Hospital of Wenzhou Medical University (reference: 2023-026 K-21-01). This work will be disseminated by peer-review publications, abstract presentations at national and international conferences and data sharing with other researchers. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: ChiCTR2300070082.