Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 11 de 11
Filtrar
2.
Laryngoscope ; 131(5): 975-981, 2021 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32876342

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Since their development in the 1970s electronic health records (EHRs) are now nearly ubiquitous. This study aims to characterize the daily interactions of otolaryngology providers with EHRs. METHODS: This study was a cross-sectional review of provider efficiency profile (PEP) data, as collected by a major EHR vendor. Participating institutions had 6 months of de-identified PEP data reviewed starting January 1, 2019. PEP data is generated for providers with scheduled patients, both attendings and advanced practice providers (APPs). Time metrics are recorded when a provider is interacting with the EHR including a 5-second time-out for inactivity. RESULTS: Data on 269 otolaryngologists and 29 APPs from 10 institutions were evaluated. On scheduled ambulatory clinic days attendings spent 70 ± 36 (mean ± standard deviation) min interacting in the EHR versus 108 ± 46 min for APPs. Of the daily EHR time, mean time in notes, clinical review, in basket, orders, and schedule were 30.1 ± 19.4, 9.6 ± 6.1, 7.3 ± 5.8, and 5.8 ± 7.6 min, respectively. Per patient visit, median (interquartile range) time in notes, clinical review, and orders were 3.19 (2.2-4.9), 1.14 (0.63-1.8), and 0.70 (0.47-1.05) min, respectively. Mean progress note length was 4638 ± 2143 characters. CONCLUSION: Otolaryngology providers spend a meaningful portion of their clinic day interacting with the EHR. PEP data may provide means to target interventions and a metric to measure the impact of those interventions on provider EHR efficiency. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 3 Laryngoscope, 131:975-981, 2021.


Asunto(s)
Instituciones de Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Eficiencia Organizacional/estadística & datos numéricos , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Otorrinolaringólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Otolaringología/estadística & datos numéricos , Benchmarking/métodos , Benchmarking/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Registros Electrónicos de Salud/tendencias , Humanos , Otorrinolaringólogos/organización & administración , Otorrinolaringólogos/tendencias , Otolaringología/organización & administración , Otolaringología/tendencias , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos
3.
Laryngoscope ; 131(2): E388-E394, 2021 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32702164

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: To characterize in depth non-research and research payments from industry to otolaryngologists in 2018 with an emphasis on product types. METHODS: Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments program was used for data collection: payment amount, the nature of payments, products associated with the payments, date of the payments, and companies making the payments were studied. Products associated with the payments were classified by categorical type. Descriptive statistics were used to analyze the data. RESULTS: There were 70,172 payments for a total of $11,001,875 made to otolaryngologists in 2018 with a median payment of $19. Food and beverage had the highest number of payments made (89.96%). Consulting fees (33.46%) composed the highest total payment amount. The two companies that contributed the highest amount were Stryker Corporation and Intersect ENT Inc. Sinus conditions had the most products within the top 25 products associated with payments. The top five products with the highest payments received were for balloon sinus dilation, nasal spray, sinus implant, Botox, and cochlear implant. There was a bimodal payment distribution demonstrating a higher number of payments made in the spring and fall. CONCLUSION: Our study is the first to review payments to otolaryngologists in 2018 and classify these payments into product types. The products and companies that contributed the highest payments were associated with sinus conditions. The products that dominated in each subspecialty of otolaryngology coincide with clinical practice trends and emerging technologies. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4 Laryngoscope, 131:E388-E394, 2021.


Asunto(s)
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services, U.S./estadística & datos numéricos , Industrias/economía , Otorrinolaringólogos/economía , Conflicto de Intereses/economía , Humanos , Industrias/estadística & datos numéricos , Otorrinolaringólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Otorrinolaringólogos/tendencias , Otolaringología/economía , Otolaringología/instrumentación , Otolaringología/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Estados Unidos
4.
Am J Rhinol Allergy ; 35(1): 122-131, 2021 Jan.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32762250

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Viral respiratory tract infections are associated with a significant burden of disease and represent one of the leading causes of mortality worldwide. The current Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic highlights the devastating toll that respiratory viruses have on humanity and the desperate need to understand the biological characteristics that define them in order to develop efficacious treatments and vaccines. To date, Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus 2 (SARS-CoV-2) has infected nearly 600 times more people and resulted in 200 times more deaths relative to Severe Acute Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (SARS-CoV) and Middle Eastern Respiratory Syndrome Coronavirus (MERS-CoV) combined. OBJECTIVE: Through this review, we aim to summarize the key characteristics of respiratory viruses that hold global significance, with a focus on SARS-CoV-2. Our goal is to disseminate our current knowledge of these infectious agents to otolaryngologists, in particular rhinologists, practicing in the COVID-19 era. METHODS: The general and clinical characteristics of selected respiratory viruses along with available viral treatments and vaccines are reviewed. RESULTS: There has been significant progress in our understanding of the epidemiology and pathogenesis of various respiratory viruses. However, despite the advancement in knowledge, efficacious vaccines and antiviral treatments remain elusive for most respiratory viruses. The dire need for these scientific discoveries is highlighted by the recent COVID-19 pandemic, which has prompted investigators worldwide to conduct clinical trials at an accelerated timeline in an effort to reduce the morbidity and mortality associated with SARS-CoV-2 infection. Rhinologists will continue to remain on the front-lines of pandemics associated with respiratory viruses. CONCLUSION: In light of these unprecedented times, the need to understand the nuances of these viral respiratory pathogens, especially SARS-CoV-2, cannot be overemphasized. This knowledge base is of particular importance to otolaryngologists, whose expertise in the upper airway coincides with the anatomic tropism of these infectious agents.


Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Farmacológico de COVID-19 , COVID-19/prevención & control , Otorrinolaringólogos , Antiinfecciosos Locales/uso terapéutico , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , COVID-19/virología , Transmisión de Enfermedad Infecciosa/prevención & control , Humanos , Otorrinolaringólogos/normas , Otorrinolaringólogos/tendencias , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Enfermedades Respiratorias/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Respiratorias/prevención & control , Enfermedades Respiratorias/virología , SARS-CoV-2/patogenicidad , Vacunas Virales/uso terapéutico , Virus/clasificación , Virus/patogenicidad
5.
J Craniomaxillofac Surg ; 46(12): 2120-2126, 2018 Dec.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30528988

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: In the field of head and neck microvascular surgery, there are currently no clear, universally accepted recommendations on the intraoperative, preoperative, and postoperative management of these patients. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A 23-question cross-sectional survey was distributed to otolaryngologists who perform microvascular reconstruction. Information about practice setting, fellowship training background, intraoperative practice, postoperative practice, and surgical complications were analyzed. RESULTS: Complete survey responses were received from 102 (32.8% response rate) of surveyed otolaryngologists who perform microvascular surgery. A great degree of variability was noted in intraoperative and postoperative care of free flap patients. Overall, self-reported free flap survival-rates were relatively high, despite the variability in practice, with the majority of surgeons (74%) reporting flap survival rate of 96-100%. Complication rates requiring return to the operating room were low; all respondents reported <20% overall complications with <10% re-operation rates due to vascular complications. CONCLUSION: An increasing number of microvascular-trained otolaryngologists are performing free flaps. Self-reported free flap survival rates are high and complication rates are low, despite significant variability in intraoperative and postoperative practices among otolaryngologists performing microvascular flap reconstruction. By identifying these differences among surgeons, we hope to provide the impetus for further academic dialog and prospective trials.


Asunto(s)
Colgajos Tisulares Libres/tendencias , Microcirugia/tendencias , Otorrinolaringólogos/tendencias , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Adulto , Canadá , Estudios Transversales , Medicina Basada en la Evidencia , Becas , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Microcirugia/educación , Otorrinolaringólogos/educación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias , Procedimientos de Cirugía Plástica/educación , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Tasa de Supervivencia , Estados Unidos
6.
Int Forum Allergy Rhinol ; 8(9): 1034-1040, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29979841

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The objective of this work was to evaluate factors associated with antibiotic and oral corticosteroid (OCS) prescription among otolaryngologists regularly performing sinus surgery. METHODS: Fellowship-trained rhinologists, including fellowship directors, were identified via the American Rhinologic Society (ARS) website. Non-fellowship-trained otolaryngologists performing ≥25 balloons (frontal/maxillary) or ≥25 functional endoscopic sinus surgeries (FESSs) (frontal/maxillary/ethmoids) were also included in "balloon surgeons" and "sinus surgeon" cohorts, respectively. Prescribing data for Medicare Part D beneficiaries was obtained for 2015. RESULTS: Otolaryngologists included in this analysis wrote a median of 54 scripts for antibiotics, with a 15.1% antibiotic prescription rate. The overall script length per antibiotic was 11.1 days. Of fellowship-trained rhinologists, 90.2% wrote fewer than 100 scripts, compared to 25.6% and 32.5% of sinus surgeons and balloon surgeons, respectively. Fellowship-trained rhinologists wrote lengthier antibiotic scripts (14.1 vs 10.3 days, p < 0.05). Clinicians who have been in practice longer prescribed antibiotics significantly more frequently. Fellowship-trained rhinologists had a greater OCS rate (8.9%) than balloon and sinus surgeons (7.1%), also writing lengthier courses (15.0 vs 8.1 days). Early-career otolaryngologists wrote lengthier steroid prescriptions than those with 11 to 20 years and >20 years in practice. CONCLUSION: Antibiotic and OCS utilization varies by type of training, as non-fellowship-trained sinus surgeons and balloon surgeons tend to utilize antibiotics more aggressively, and fellowship-trained rhinologists utilize OCS more frequently. Otolaryngologists with more years in practice are more likely to incorporate antibiotics in the management of sinus disorders, although these conclusions must be considered in the context of this resource's limitations. Further clarification of guidelines may be helpful for minimizing divergent practices and maintaining a consensus.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Otorrinolaringólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Esteroides/uso terapéutico , Cirujanos/estadística & datos numéricos , Antibacterianos/normas , Humanos , Medicare Part D/estadística & datos numéricos , Otorrinolaringólogos/educación , Otorrinolaringólogos/tendencias , Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/normas , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Esteroides/normas , Cirujanos/educación , Estados Unidos
7.
Laryngoscope ; 128(7): 1540-1545, 2018 07.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29737532

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Balloon dilation (BD) is a controversial alternative to conventional sinus surgery. The role of industry on practice patterns remains unknown. The aim of this study was to determine whether industry payments from BD manufacturers influence practice patterns for otolaryngologists and evaluate how these payments change over time. METHODS: Retrospective cohort study using Medicare Provider Utilization and Payment (PUP) Data and Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services Open Payments (OP) general payment datasets. A total of 294 otolaryngologists identified in the PUP dataset who performed BD procedures from January 1, 2013, to December 31, 2015, were cross-referenced in the OP dataset from January 1, 2014, to December 31, 2016, for BD manufacturer payments. Payments to surgeons performing BD stratified by amount, type, and number of procedures performed were primary outcome measures. RESULTS: Of the 294 otolaryngologists reporting BD procedures, 223 (76%) received payments from a company that manufactures BD devices. Receipt of $2,500 in BD payments was associated with performance of one additional BD procedure, and consulting fees were most positively associated with performing additional BD procedures (P = 0.006). The providers receiving the most in BD payments were more likely to continue to receive the most in payments, regardless of number of BD procedures performed. Performing more BD procedures did not correlate with decrease in other sinus procedures. CONCLUSION: Payments to otolaryngologists from manufacturers of sinus BD devices are associated with the performance of an increased number of such procedures. Surgeons should consider the impact of interactions with industry when evaluating patients for BD procedures. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: 4. Laryngoscope, 128:1540-1545, 2018.


Asunto(s)
Conflicto de Intereses , Dilatación/tendencias , Otorrinolaringólogos/economía , Senos Paranasales/cirugía , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Dilatación/economía , Endoscopía/tendencias , Humanos , Relaciones Interprofesionales/ética , Otorrinolaringólogos/ética , Otorrinolaringólogos/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/economía , Estudios Retrospectivos , Estados Unidos
8.
Int J Audiol ; 57(sup4): S76-S88, 2018 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29676584

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVE: Effective management of patients diagnosed with ototoxicity is needed to reduce hearing and balance damage which affects communication and life quality. Despite widespread recommendations to monitor and manage ototoxicity in an early and effective manner, there is limited evidence to support the actual implementation of these recommendations for affected patient groups in healthcare services across the UK with limited publications available. In this study, an online questionnaire analysed the current practice of ototoxicity management and patient pathways across the UK once the diagnosis of ototoxicity was confirmed, targeting Audiologists, ENTs/AVPs and GPs. DESIGN: Qualitative Survey Study. STUDY SAMPLE: A randomised sample of hearing services in the UK, including audiology departments; GP practices and local health settings were targeted with a total of 134 completed surveys. RESULTS: About 72% reported the absence of ototoxicity management protocols within their centre. Results depicted great inconsistency and variation across the UK in ototoxicity management services provided, treatment modification, monitoring and referral pathways. CONCLUSION: Developing and advocating national guidelines are intended not only to inform clinical decision making but to provide minimum standards of care in ototoxicity management and offer greater awareness and education to improve patients' quality of life.


Asunto(s)
Audiología/tendencias , Disparidades en Atención de Salud/tendencias , Pérdida Auditiva/terapia , Audición/efectos de los fármacos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Especialización/tendencias , Medicina Estatal/tendencias , Sistemas de Registro de Reacción Adversa a Medicamentos/tendencias , Audiólogos/tendencias , Vías Clínicas/tendencias , Médicos Generales/tendencias , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Pérdida Auditiva/inducido químicamente , Pérdida Auditiva/diagnóstico , Pérdida Auditiva/fisiopatología , Pruebas Auditivas/tendencias , Humanos , Otorrinolaringólogos/tendencias , Derivación y Consulta/tendencias , Reino Unido
9.
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 158(6): 1127-1133, 2018 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29484916

RESUMEN

Objective Tympanostomy tube (TT) insertion is the most common ambulatory surgery performed on children. American Academy of Otolaryngology-Head and Neck Surgery Founda-tion (AAO-HNSF) Clinical Practice Guidelines (CPGs) recommend hearing testing for all pediatric TT candidates. The aim of this study was to assess audiometric testing in this population. Study Design Retrospective population-based cohort study. Setting All hospitals in the Canadian province of Ontario. Subjects and Methods All patients 12 years of age and younger who underwent at least 1 TT procedure between January 1993 and June 2016. The primary outcomes were the percentage of patients who underwent a hearing test within 1 year before and/or 1 year after surgery. Results A total of 316,599 bilateral TT procedures were performed during the study period (1993 to 2016). Presurgical hearing tests increased from 55.7% to 74.9%, and postsurgical hearing tests increased from 42.2% to 68.9%. Younger surgeons demonstrated a greater adherence to the CPGs (relative risk [RR], 1.22; 95% CI, 1.08-1.38; P = .001). Remarkably, there was not a spike in preoperative hearing tests following the introduction of the CPGs in 2013 (RR, 1.12; 95% CI, 0.85-1.47; P = .432). Presurgical hearing testing ranged from 26.1% to 83.5% across health regions. Conclusion In this cohort of children who underwent TT placement, the trends of preoperative and postoperative audiometric testing are increasing but are still lower than recommended by the CPGs, despite a tripling of practicing audiologists. This study describes the current state of testing in Ontario and highlights issues of access to audiology services, possible parent preferences, and the importance of ongoing continuing medical education for all health care practitioners.


Asunto(s)
Audiometría/métodos , Adhesión a Directriz/tendencias , Ventilación del Oído Medio/métodos , Otitis Media/cirugía , Otorrinolaringólogos/tendencias , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Ontario , Otitis Media con Derrame/cirugía , Estudios Retrospectivos
10.
JAMA Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg ; 144(4): 322-329, 2018 Apr 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29470574

RESUMEN

IMPORTANCE: Monitoring current trends in pediatric otolaryngology will help adjust our training and practice paradigms in a way that ensures the long-term viability of the specialty. OBJECTIVES: To gauge the current scope of pediatric otolaryngology (ORL) practice within and outside of the United States and to identify changes in caseload over the past decade. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: An online survey was sent to pediatric ORL chairs and/or fellowship directors at 42 institutions in the United States and abroad. For 59 procedures, respondents were asked to estimate the percentage of cases performed by their department, determine whether this percentage has changed over the past 10 years (2006-2016), and identify any other specialties performing the procedure. Data were collected during a 2-week period in October 2016, from October 7 through 21, and analyzed from November 2016 through February 2017. MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: Main outcomes included the percentage of operations currently performed by the respondent's department for each procedure; whether this percentage has decreased, increased, or remained the same over the past decade; other specialties that perform each procedure; and any procedures added to or eliminated from the respondent's practice over the past decade. RESULTS: Respondents from 33 of the 42 academic institutions completed the survey (23 in the United States and 10 international; 79% response rate). Respondents reported the least involvement in procedures pertaining to facial plastic and reconstructive surgery, aerodigestive endoscopy, and congenital anomalies. Conversely, a mean (SD) of 91% (7%) reported performing 90% to 100% of otology, airway, rhinology, and general procedures. A mean (SD) of 82% (11%) reported that their department's involvement in each procedure has remained the same from 2006 to 2016. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The specialty of pediatric ORL has evolved over the past decade. There has been a notable decline in involvement in facial plastic and reconstructive surgery and treatment of vascular malformations and esophageal disorders. The management of thyroid disease is in flux. Monitoring current trends to adjust training and practice paradigms will ensure the long-term viability of the specialty.


Asunto(s)
Otorrinolaringólogos/tendencias , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Otorrinolaringológicos/tendencias , Pediatras/tendencias , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/tendencias , Canadá , Niño , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Enfermedades Otorrinolaringológicas/cirugía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados Unidos
11.
Otolaryngol Pol ; 73(1): 1-5, 2018 Nov 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30920384

RESUMEN

Advanced age is often burdened with many deficits that are a consequence of the aging process, unfavorable lifestyle and multi-morbidity. They contribute to increased morbidity and disability of the older people. Laryngological problems often concern seniors, particularly progressing with age hearing impairment, dizziness, balance disorders, epistaxis, nasopharyngeal diseases, larynx, sinuses, and salivary glands disorders. They are not only a health threat, such as head and neck cancer, but they contribute to the deterioration of mobility, falls and injuries, depression, cognitive functions impairment and, consequently, functional disability, loss of independence and a sense of isolation. In this context, taking as an example the most common ailment, which is hearing impairment, laryngological procedures in the form of the use of hearing aids or cochlear implant improves cognitive functions, mood, self-esteem, opportunities for social interaction and everyday functioning, and the quality of life of older people. In turn, in view of the typical for older age polypathology and of significant reduction of the reserves of the organism, effective treatment aimed at improving health, preventing complications of diagnostics and therapy as well as disability with the desire to maintain independence and good quality of life requires the cooperation of different specialists. The knowledge and experience of geriatricians and the comprehensive geriatric assessment used as the diagnostic tool, aimed at identifying deficits typical of seniors' age may significantly contribute to a more adequate risk and benefit assessment, selection of optimal treatment for a given health situation and identification of high-risk individuals requiring during the treatment period special supervision to reduce the risk of complications and the risk of development of geriatric syndromes such as delirium, cognitive disorders, malnutrition, falls and injuries, functional disability.


Asunto(s)
Geriatras/psicología , Geriatras/tendencias , Geriatría/tendencias , Colaboración Intersectorial , Otorrinolaringólogos/psicología , Otorrinolaringólogos/tendencias , Otolaringología/tendencias , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Envejecimiento , Femenino , Predicción , Anciano Frágil , Evaluación Geriátrica/métodos , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Periodo Preoperatorio
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA