[Acute benzodiazepine withdrawal delirium].

In this case report we describe a life-threatening episode of delirium in a 51-year-old man. The condition was triggered by an abrupt withdrawal of benzodiazepines. The patient had been taking multiple sedatives for several years but a large proportion of the drugs were not available in Denmark. His general practitioner substituted and prescribed oxazepam and zolpidem for ten days. Afterwards the patient did not have access to benzodiazepines and developed a severe benzodiazepine withdrawal delirium. He was treated with diazepam and olanzapine with gradual dose reduction.

Melatonin for preoperative and postoperative anxiety in adults.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety in relation to surgery is a well-known problem. Melatonin offers an alternative treatment to benzodiazepines for ameliorating this condition in the preoperative and postoperative periods. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of melatonin on preoperative and postoperative anxiety compared to placebo or benzodiazepines. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases on 10 July 2020: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL, and Web of Science. For ongoing trials and protocols, we searched clinicaltrials.gov and the World Health Organization (WHO) International Clinical Trials Registry Platform. SELECTION CRITERIA: We included randomized, placebo-controlled or standard treatment-controlled (or both) studies that evaluated the effects of preoperatively administered melatonin on preoperative or postoperative anxiety. We included adult patients of both sexes (15 to 90 years of age) undergoing any kind of surgical procedure for which it was necessary to use general, regional, or topical anaesthesia. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: One review author conducted data extraction in duplicate. Data extracted included information about study design, country of origin, number of participants and demographic details, type of surgery, type of anaesthesia, intervention and dosing regimens, preoperative anxiety outcome measures, and postoperative anxiety outcome measures. MAIN RESULTS: We included 27 randomized controlled trials (RCTs), involving 2319 participants, that assessed melatonin for treating preoperative anxiety, postoperative anxiety, or both. Twenty-four studies compared melatonin with placebo. Eleven studies compared melatonin to a benzodiazepine (seven studies with midazolam, three studies with alprazolam, and one study with oxazepam). Other comparators in a small number of studies were gabapentin, clonidine, and pregabalin. No studies were judged to be at low risk of bias for all domains. Most studies were judged to be at unclear risk of bias overall. Eight studies were judged to be at high risk of bias in one or more domain, and thus, to be at high risk of bias overall. Melatonin versus placebo Melatonin probably results in a reduction in preoperative anxiety measured by a visual analogue scale (VAS, 0 to 100 mm) compared to placebo (mean difference (MD) -11.69, 95% confidence interval (CI) -13.80 to -9.59; 18 studies, 1264 participants; moderate-certainty evidence), based on a meta-analysis of 18 studies. Melatonin may reduce immediate postoperative anxiety measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS compared to placebo (MD -5.04, 95% CI -9.52 to -0.55; 7 studies, 524 participants; low-certainty evidence), and may reduce delayed postoperative anxiety measured six hours after surgery using the State-Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (MD -5.31, 95% CI -8.78 to -1.84; 2 studies; 73 participants; low-certainty evidence). Melatonin versus benzodiazepines (midazolam and alprazolam) Melatonin probably results in little or no difference in preoperative anxiety measured on a 0 to 100 mm VAS (MD 0.78, 95% CI -2.02 to 3.58; 7 studies, 409 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and there may be little or no difference in immediate postoperative anxiety (MD -2.12, 95% CI -4.61 to 0.36; 3 studies, 176 participants; low-certainty evidence). Adverse events Fourteen studies did not report on adverse events. Six studies specifically reported that no side effects were observed, and the remaining seven studies reported cases of nausea, sleepiness, dizziness, and headache; however, no serious adverse events were reported. Eleven studies measured psychomotor and cognitive function, or both, and in general, these studies found that benzodiazepines impaired psychomotor and cognitive function more than placebo and melatonin. Fourteen studies evaluated sedation and generally found that benzodiazepine caused the highest degree of sedation, but melatonin also showed sedative properties compared to placebo. Several studies did not report on adverse events; therefore, it is not possible to conclude with certainty, from the data on adverse effects collected in this review, that melatonin is better tolerated than benzodiazepines. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: When compared with placebo, melatonin given as premedication (as tablets or sublingually) probably reduces preoperative anxiety in adults (measured 50 to 120 minutes after administration), which is potentially clinically relevant. The effect of melatonin on postoperative anxiety compared to placebo (measured in the recovery room and six hours after surgery) was also evident but was much smaller, and the clinical relevance of this finding is uncertain. There was little or no difference in anxiety when melatonin was compared with benzodiazepines. Thus, melatonin may have a similar effect to benzodiazepines in reducing preoperative and postoperative anxiety in adults.

ANTECEDENTES: La ansiedad relacionada con la cirugía es un problema conocido. La melatonina ofrece un tratamiento alternativo a las benzodiazepinas para mejorar esta afección en los períodos pre y posoperatorio. OBJETIVOS: Evaluar los efectos de la melatonina en la ansiedad pre y posoperatoria en comparación con el placebo o las benzodiazepinas. MÉTODOS DE BÚSQUEDA: Se realizaron búsquedas en las siguientes bases de datos el 10 de julio de 2020: CENTRAL, MEDLINE, Embase, CINAHL y Web of Science. Para los ensayos y protocolos en curso, se buscó en clinicaltrials.gov y en la Plataforma de registros internacionales de ensayos clínicos de la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS). CRITERIOS DE SELECCIÓN: Estudios aleatorizados controlados con placebo o controlados con tratamiento estándar, o ambos, que evaluaron los efectos de la melatonina administrada de forma preoperatoria para la ansiedad preoperatoria o posoperatoria. Se incluyeron pacientes adultos de ambos sexos (15 a 90 años de edad) a los que se les realizó cualquier clase de procedimiento quirúrgico donde fue necesario utilizar anestesia general, regional o tópica. OBTENCIÓN Y ANÁLISIS DE LOS DATOS: Un autor de la revisión realizó la extracción de los datos por duplicado. Los datos que se extrajeron incluyeron información acerca del diseño del estudio, el país de origen, el número de participantes y los detalles demográficos, el tipo de cirugía, el tipo de anestesia, la intervención y el régimen de dosis, medidas de desenlace de ansiedad preoperatoria y medidas de desenlace de ansiedad posoperatoria. RESULTADOS PRINCIPALES: Se incluyeron 27 ensayos controlados aleatorizados (ECA), con 2319 participantes, que evaluaron la melatonina para el tratamiento de la ansiedad preoperatoria, la ansiedad posoperatoria o ambas. Veinticuatro estudios compararon la melatonina con el placebo. Once estudios compararon la melatonina con una benzodiazepina (siete estudios con midazolam, tres estudios con alprazolam y un estudio con oxazepam). Otros comparadores en un escaso número de estudios fueron la gabapentina, la clonidina y la pregabalina. No se consideró que ningún estudio tuviera un riesgo bajo de sesgo en todos los dominios. La mayoría de los estudios se consideraron con riesgo incierto de sesgo en general. Se consideró que ocho estudios tenían un alto riesgo de sesgo en uno o más dominios y, por lo tanto, un alto riesgo de sesgo en general. Melatonina versus placebo La melatonina probablemente da lugar a una reducción de la ansiedad preoperatoria medida por una escala visual analógica (EVA, 0 a 100 mm) en comparación con el placebo (diferencia de medias [DM] ­11,69; intervalo de confianza [IC] del 95%: ­13,80 a ­9,59; 18 estudios, 1264 participantes; evidencia de certeza moderada), sobre la base de un metanálisis de 18 estudios. La melatonina podría reducir la ansiedad posoperatoria inmediata medida en una EVA de 0 a 100 mm en comparación con el placebo (DM ­5,04; IC del 95%: ­9,52 a ­0,55; siete estudios, 524 participantes; evidencia de certeza baja), y podría reducir la ansiedad posoperatoria tardía medida seis horas después de la cirugía mediante el State­Trait Anxiety Inventory (STAI) (DM ­5,31; IC del 95%: ­8,78 a ­1,84; dos estudios; 73 participantes; evidencia de certeza baja). Melatonina versus benzodiazepinas (midazolam y alprazolam) La melatonina probablemente da lugar a poca o ninguna diferencia en la ansiedad preoperatoria medida en una EVA de 0 a 100 mm (DM 0,78; IC del 95%: ­2,02 a 3,58; siete estudios, 409 participantes; evidencia de certeza moderada) y podría haber poca o ninguna diferencia en la ansiedad posoperatoria inmediata (DM ­2,12; IC del 95%: ­4,61 a 0,36; tres estudios, 176 participantes; evidencia de certeza baja). Eventos adversos Catorce estudios no informaron sobre los eventos adversos. Seis estudios informaron específicamente que no se observaron efectos secundarios y los siete estudios restantes informaron casos de náuseas, somnolencia, mareos y cefalea; sin embargo, no se informaron eventos adversos graves. Once estudios midieron la función psicomotora y cognitiva, o ambas, y en general, estos estudios encontraron que las benzodiazepinas deterioraron la función psicomotora y cognitiva más que el placebo y la melatonina. Catorce estudios evaluaron la sedación y en general encontraron que la benzodiazepina causaba el mayor grado de sedación, pero la melatonina también mostró propiedades sedantes en comparación con el placebo. Varios estudios no informaron sobre los efectos adversos; por lo tanto, no es posible concluir con certeza, a partir de los datos sobre los efectos adversos obtenidos en esta revisión, que la melatonina se tolera mejor que las benzodiazepinas. CONCLUSIONES DE LOS AUTORES: Cuando se compara con el placebo, la melatonina administrada como premedicación (en forma de comprimidos o sublingual) probablemente reduce la ansiedad preoperatoria en los adultos (medida entre 50 y 120 minutos después de la administración), lo que es potencialmente relevante desde el punto de vista clínico. El efecto de la melatonina sobre la ansiedad posoperatoria en comparación con el placebo (medido en la sala de recuperación y seis horas después de la cirugía) también fue evidente, pero fue mucho menor, y la relevancia clínica de este hallazgo no está clara. Hubo poca o ninguna diferencia en la ansiedad cuando la melatonina se comparó con las benzodiazepinas. Por lo tanto, la melatonina puede tener un efecto similar al de las benzodiazepinas en la reducción de la ansiedad pre y posoperatoria en los adultos.

Associations of Benzodiazepines, Z-Drugs, and Other Anxiolytics With Subsequent Dementia in Patients With Affective Disorders: A Nationwide Cohort and Nested Case-Control Study.

OBJECTIVE: Benzodiazepines and Z-drugs are two of the most prescribed agents worldwide. However, because of their cognitive side effects, the question of their influence on the risk of dementia has been raised. The authors examined the association of benzodiazepines, Z-drugs, and other anxiolytics with incident dementia in patients with affective disorders. METHODS: The authors conducted a cohort and nested case-control study of 235,465 patients over age 20 who were identified in the Danish National Patient Registry as having had a first-time hospital contact for an affective disorder between 1996 and 2015. From the Danish National Prescription Registry, information was obtained on all prescriptions for benzodiazepines, Z-drugs, and other anxiolytics, and patients were followed for incident dementia (defined by hospital discharge diagnosis or acetylcholinesterase inhibitor use). Cox proportional hazards and conditional logistic regression models were used to calculate hazard ratios and odds ratios with adjustment for sociodemographic and clinical variables. RESULTS: A total of 75.9% (N=171,287) of patients had any use of benzodiazepines or Z-drugs, and during the median follow-up of 6.1 years (interquartile range, 2.7-11), 9,776 (4.2%) patients were diagnosed with dementia. Any use of benzodiazepines or Z-drugs showed no association with dementia after multiple adjustments in either the cohort analysis or a nested case-control design. In the cohort analysis, the number of prescriptions and the cumulated dose of benzodiazepines or Z-drugs at baseline were not associated with dementia. In the nested case-control study, where prescriptions were counted from 1995 until 2 years before the index date, there was a slightly higher odds ratio of dementia in patients with the lowest use of benzodiazepines or Z-drugs (odds ratio=1.08, 95% CI=1.01, 1.15) compared with no lifetime use. However, patients with the highest use had the lowest odds of developing dementia (odds ratio=0.83, 95% CI=0.77, 0.88). CONCLUSIONS: This large cohort study did not reveal associations between use of benzodiazepines or Z-drugs and subsequent dementia, even when exposures were cumulated or divided into long- and short-acting drugs. Some results were compatible with a protective effect.

Comparison of the Effects of Melatonin and Oxazepam on Anxiety Levels and Sleep Quality in Patients With ST-Segment-Elevation Myocardial Infarction Following Primary Percutaneous Coronary Intervention: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

BACKGROUND: Anxiety and sleep disorders are prevalent problems in patients presenting with ST-segment-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI). Usually, these problems are managed by benzodiazepines, which-albeit effective-could cause adverse effects and drug interaction. OBJECTIVE: This study was designed to compare the effects of melatonin and oxazepam in the management of anxiety and insomnia on patients following primary percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) with a view to providing a safer alternative. METHODS: This study was designed as a randomized clinical trial. STEMI patients managed with primary PCI were enrolled and randomized into 2 groups through the permuted block randomization. The patients received either oxazepam (10 mg) or melatonin (3 mg) every night. Autoimmune disease or previous use of psychoactive medications was considered the exclusion criterion. Levels of anxiety and sleep quality were evaluated using the Hamilton Anxiety Rating Scale (HAM-A) and the Groningen Sleep Quality Score and compared between the groups. RESULTS: Each group contained 20 patients. Melatonin showed a significant advantage over oxazepam in improving sleep quality ( P = 0.040). Comparisons of the efficacy of both medications in lowering the anxiety levels when considering all the items of the HAM-A, including those related to cardiovascular disease, were significantly in favor of melatonin ( P = 0.019). CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: The results of this study suggest that melatonin, a drug with more favorable drug interaction and adverse effect profile, could be more effective than oxazepam in improving the sleep quality and anxiety levels of patients presenting with STEMI, and it could be considered a new alternative to benzodiazepines in this setting.

[Treatment of Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome with Oxazepam or Clomethiazole - A Naturalistic Observational Study]. / Die Behandlung des Alkoholentzugs mit Oxazepam oder Clomethiazol ­ eine naturalistische Beobachtungsstudie.

Whilst internationally benzodiazepines are first choice for treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome, Germany has a long tradition with clomethiazole. This study explores effectiveness of clomethiazole versus oxazepam in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome within an observational, stratified, non-inferiority study in routine care. Main outcome criterion was severity of the alcohol withdrawal syndrome (Alcohol Withdrawal Syndrome [AWS]) Scale in the first five days. Additionally, the association between the detoxification protocol (five vs. ten days) and AWS-Score was examined. 453 patients (74.2 % male, average age 47.1 years [±â€Š9.2]) took part; 249 received oxazepam (55.0 %) and 204 clomethiazole (45.0 %). The average duration of inpatient treatment was 14.0 days (±â€Š6.3) in both groups. The average AWS-score was lower in the oxazepam group compared to the clomethiazole group (50.0 [±â€Š26.5] vs. 56.2 [±â€Š31.5]; p < .05; effect size d = - .25). Patients with a shorter detoxification protocol had a lower AWS sum score compared to patients with a longer protocol (p < .001; d = - .46). In treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome in routine care oxazepam yields at least comparable results to clomethiazole.

Oxazepam for the Treatment of Substance Abuse and Depression: Is it Appropriate?

Distinguishing itself from other benzodiazepine drugs, oxazepam has an interesting pharmacological and clinical profile, including binding effects on the translocator protein (TSPO) and a relatively favorable safety and abuse liability profile. TSPO is found in the brain (where it is involved in neurosteroid synthesis), but is also expressed in the heart and other peripheral tissues. Oxazepam is potentially useful in the treatment of substance abuse, especially in conjunction with the cortisol synthesis inhibitor metyrapone, and can be considered an appropriate medication to use in the treatment of depression. The oxazepam/metyrapone combination has been piloted in cocaine-dependent patients and should be investigated in patients with depression. Expression of cardiac TSPO is altered by different stress conditions, and drugs binding to TSPO may have cardioprotective effects. The possibility of oxazepam, alone or together with antidepressant drugs, having a positive effect on cardiac function in patients with depression should also be studied. [Journal of Psychosocial Nursing and Mental Health Services, 54(5), 21-24.].

A 5-year follow-up study of users of benzodiazepine: starting with diazepam versus oxazepam.

BACKGROUND: Drug dependency may develop during long-term benzodiazepine use, indicated, for example, by dose escalation. The first benzodiazepine chosen may affect the risk of dose escalation. AIM: To detect possible differences in benzodiazepine use between new users of diazepam and oxazepam over time. DESIGN AND SETTING: This 5-year prescription database study included 19 747 new benzodiazepine users, inhabitants of Norway, aged 30-60 years, with first redemption for diazepam or oxazepam. METHOD: Individuals starting on diazepam versus oxazepam were analysed by logistic regression with sex, age, other drug redemptions, prescriber's specialty, household income, education level, type of work, and vocational rehabilitation support as background variables. Time to reach a daily average intake of ≥1 defined daily doses (DDD) over a 3-month period was analysed using a Cox proportional hazard regression model. RESULTS: New users of oxazepam had a higher risk for dose escalation compared with new users of diazepam. This was true even when accounting for differences in sociodemographic status and previous drug use (hazard ratio [HR] 1.33, 95% confidence interval = 1.17 to 1.51). CONCLUSION: Most doctors prescribed, according to recommendations, oxazepam to individuals they may have regarded as prone to and at risk of dependency. However, these individuals were at higher risk for dose escalation even when accounting for differences in sociodemographic status and previous drug use. Differences between the two user groups could be explained by different preferences for starting drug, DDD for oxazepam being possibly too low, and some unaccounted differences in illness.

Mixed myoclonic-absence status epilepticus in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy.

Myoclonic status epilepticus or mixed absence-myoclonic status is uncommon in juvenile myoclonic epilepsy (JME), often precipitated by sleep deprivation, withdrawal of medication, or inadequate antiepileptic drugs (Thomas et al., 2006; Crespel et al., 2013). Such episodes respond well to benzodiazepines or valproate (Crespel et al., 2013). We present the video-EEG of a 24-year-old woman with JME and bipolar disorder. She had a confusional state five days after withdrawal of clonazepam (14 mg/d) and introduction of oxazepam (200 mg/d), followed by catatonic stupor with subtle myoclonus of the face and the arms. The EEG showed absence status (figures 1, 2), which stopped after IV injection of clonazepam (1 mg) (figure 3). Consciousness returned to normal [Published with video sequence and figures (1)].

Influence of central nervous system-acting drugs on results of cognitive testing in geriatric inpatients.

INTRODUCTION: Growing evidence shows a high correlation between extensive use of central nervous system-acting drugs (CNSADs) in elderly patients and adverse drug reactions (ADRs) such as falls, fractures, and mortality. RESEARCH QUESTION: Are results of cognitive testing with the Mini Mental Status Examination (MMSE) influenced by use of CNSADs? SETTING: Geriatric inpatient service for acute, subacute, and rehabilitation care. METHODS: Secondary combined analysis of two prospective, single-center study cohorts (PROPSYC, 2011 and AGE OUT, 2012) with identical procedure for the MMSE at a tertiary hospital. RESULTS: Overall, 395 patients were included, 144 male (M) and 251 female (F). Mean age was 80.0 ± 8.4 years (M 76.7 ± 9.1, F 81.9 ± 7.3, p = 0.0000). Mean MMSE points were 22.9 ± 4.8 (M 23.2 ± 4.6, F 22.6 ± 5.0, p = 0.211). In total, 258 patients (65.3 %) used drugs with potential adverse cognitive properties. Analgesics with central activity were given to 117 of 395 patients (29.6 %). Low-potency opioids (tramadol hydrochloride, tilidine) were identified in 60 patients and high-potency opioids in 57 patients. Antidepressants were used in 66 patients, benzodiazepines in 26, and hypnotics in 11, while 38 patients received other CNSADs. We only found significant correlations with the results of cognitive testing for sedatives (diazepam and oxazepam, Pearson's r - 0.79, p = 0.05), but not for lorazepam. CONCLUSION: Our analysis shows an influence of sedatives (diazepam and oxazepam, but not lorazepam) on cognitive testing with the MMSE in users of CNSADs.

Sodium oxybate in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome: a randomized double-blind comparative study versus oxazepam. The GATE 1 trial.

BACKGROUND: Benzodiazepines (BDZs) are the gold standard in the treatment of alcohol withdrawal syndrome (AWS). Sodium oxybate (SMO) has been tested as a treatment for AWS with encouraging results. The aim of this phase IV, multicenter, randomized, double-blind, double-dummy study was to evaluate the efficacy of SMO in comparison with oxazepam in the treatment of uncomplicated AWS. METHODS: Alcohol-dependent outpatients (n = 126) affected by uncomplicated AWS according to the Clinical Institute Withdrawal Assessment for Alcohol-revised (CIWA-Ar) scale were enrolled in the study and randomized in two groups: 61 patients received SMO and 65 patients received oxazepam for 10 days. The primary endpoint was the reduction of symptoms of AWS measured by the change in the total CIWA-Ar score from baseline (day 1) to the end of the study (day 10). This study is registered with ClinicalTrials.gov, number: NCT02090504 RESULTS: A significant decrease of the mean total CIWA-Ar score from baseline to the end of the study was found in both the SMO (p < 0.0001) and the oxazepam group (p < 0.0001), with no significant differences between the two treatments (p = 0.21). Treatment with SMO and oxazepam resulted in a marked decrease in the severity of the mean CIWA subscales, i.e. sweating, tremor, and anxiety, with no significant differences between the two treatments. Both drugs were well tolerated and no severe side effects were reported. CONCLUSION: SMO is as effective as oxazepam, one of the gold standard BDZs, in the treatment of uncomplicated AWS. Due to its tolerability and absence of significant side effects, SMO may be considered a valid alternative choice in the treatment of AWS.

The acute effects of kava and oxazepam on anxiety, mood, neurocognition; and genetic correlates: a randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blind study.

RATIONALE: Kava (Piper methysticum) is a psychotropic plant medicine with history of cultural and medicinal use. We conducted a study comparing the acute neurocognitive, anxiolytic, and thymoleptic effects of a medicinal dose of kava to a benzodiazepine and explored for the first time specific genetic polymorphisms, which may affect the psychotropic activity of phytomedicines or benzodiazepines. METHODS: Twenty-two moderately anxious adults aged between 18 and 65 years were randomized to receive an acute dose of kava (180 mg of kavalactones), oxazepam (30 mg), and placebo 1 week apart in a crossover design trial. RESULTS: After exposure to cognitive tasks, a significant interaction was revealed between conditions on State-Trait Anxiety Inventory-State anxiety (p = 0.046, partial ŋ² = 0.14). In the oxazepam condition, there was a significant reduction in anxiety (p = 0.035), whereas there was no change in anxiety in the kava condition, and there was an increase in anxiety in the placebo condition. An increase in Bond-Lader "calmness" (p = 0.002) also occurred for the oxazepam condition. Kava was found to have no negative effect on cognition, whereas a reduction in alertness (p < 0.001) occurred in the oxazepam condition. Genetic analyses provide tentative evidence that noradrenaline (SLC6A2) transporter polymorphisms may have an effect on response to kava. CONCLUSION: Acute "medicinal level" doses of this particular kava cultivar in naive users do not provide anxiolytic activity, although the phytomedicine also appears to have no negative effects on cognition.

Effects of the combination of metyrapone and oxazepam on cocaine craving and cocaine taking: a double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled pilot study.

Although cocaine dependence affects an estimated 1.6 million people in the USA, there are currently no medications approved for the treatment of this disorder. Experiments performed in animal models have demonstrated that inhibitors of the stress response effectively reduce intravenous cocaine self-administration. This exploratory, double-blind, placebo-controlled study was designed to assess the safety and efficacy of combinations of the cortisol synthesis inhibitor metyrapone, and the benzodiazepine oxazepam, in 45 cocaine-dependent individuals. The subjects were randomized to a total daily dose of 500 mg metyrapone/20 mg oxazepam (low dose), a total daily dose of 1500 mg metyrapone/20 mg oxazepam (high dose), or placebo for 6 weeks of treatment. The outcome measures were a reduction in cocaine craving and associated cocaine use as determined by quantitative measurements of the cocaine metabolite benzoylecgonine (BE) in urine at all visits. Of the randomized subjects, 49% completed the study. The combination of metyrapone and oxazepam was well tolerated and tended to reduce cocaine craving and cocaine use, with significant reductions at several time points when controlling for baseline scores. These data suggest that further assessments of the ability of the metyrapone and oxazepam combination to support cocaine abstinence in cocaine-dependent subjects are warranted.

Duloxetine-related panic attacks.

Side-effects arising on the grounds of antidepressant administration pose as a substantial obstacle hindering successful depressive disorder treatment. Side-effects, especially those severe or those manifested through dramatic clinical presentations such as panic attacks, make the treatment far more difficult and shake patients' trust in both the treatment and the treating physician. This case report deals with a patient experiencing a moderately severe depressive episode, who responded to duloxetine treatment administered in the initial dose of 30 mg per day with as many as three panic attacks in two days. Upon duloxetine withdrawal, these panic attacks ceased as well. The patient continued tianeptine and alprazolam treatment during which no significant side-effects had been seen, so that she gradually recovered. Some of the available literature sources have suggested the possibility of duloxetine administration to the end of generalised anxiety disorder and panic attack treatment. However, they are outnumbered by the contributions reporting about duloxetine-related anxiety, aggressiveness and panic attacks. In line with the foregoing, further monitoring of each and every duloxetine-administered patient group needs to be pursued so as to be able to evaluate treatment benefits and weigh them against risks of anxiety or panic attack onset.

Oxazepam versus clomethiazol in alcohol withdrawal treatment.

The pharmacological management of the alcohol withdrawal syndrome associated with alcohol dependence is heterogeneous; however, according to the guidelines, clomethiazol is the standard medication in Germany. Benzodiazepines offer another safe possibility of treating alcohol withdrawal. In a retrospective study, alcohol-dependent patients treated either with oxazepam (n = 141) or clomethiazol (n = 357) were assessed with respect to the course of treatment and withdrawal symptoms. The results showed that under oxazepam treatment, there were fewer days with severe alcohol withdrawal symptoms and less severe adverse events, but patients receiving clomethiazol treatment had a more severe course of alcohol dependence. Oxazepam is a safe, efficient and cheap drug for the treatment of alcohol withdrawal symptoms, but controlled studies are needed to compare its effectiveness with that of clomethiazol.

Initiating acamprosate within-detoxification versus post-detoxification in the treatment of alcohol dependence.

OBJECTIVES: This trial compared the efficacy of acamprosate, started at the beginning of detoxification, to acamprosate started at the completion of detoxification, in the treatment of alcohol dependence. METHODS: This biphasic clinical trial consisted of a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled Detoxification Phase (DP), followed by a 10-week open-label Rehabilitation Phase (RP). Forty alcohol dependent patients were randomly assigned to receive either 1998 mg of acamprosate daily, or matching placebo, during the DP (5-14 days). After completing detoxification, all patients received open label acamprosate (1998 mg daily) in the RP. Outcome measures during the DP included: treatment retention, alcohol withdrawal, alcohol consumption, and oxazepam used. Outcome measures during the RP included: treatment retention and alcohol consumption. RESULTS: There were no significant outcome differences between acamprosate and placebo-treated patients during the DP. Patients given acamprosate, compared to placebo, during the DP drank more alcohol in the RP. CONCLUSIONS: Starting acamprosate at the beginning of detoxification did not improve DP outcomes. Starting acamprosate after detoxification was completed was associated with better drinking outcomes during subsequent alcohol rehabilitation treatment.

Persistent genital arousal disorder in 18 Dutch women: Part II. A syndrome clustered with restless legs and overactive bladder.

INTRODUCTION: A systematic study in women with persistent genital arousal disorder (PGAD) is urgently needed to develop its clinical management. AIM: To investigate the features, possible causes, and treatment of PGAD. METHODS: Eighteen women who fulfilled the five criteria for PGAD were included in the study. In-depth interviews were combined with laboratory and imaging studies as reported in Part I of the study. Clinical responses were observed with drugs exerting activity against a number of different neuro-regulatory mechanisms. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Detailed descriptions and clustering of some well established clinical syndromes. RESULTS: The majority of women experienced PGAD during early menopause without pre-existing psychiatric disorders and laboratory abnormalities. Most women had difficulties in describing the quality of the genital sensations. These were described in various terms and were diagnosed as dysesthesias and paresthesias. Their intensity was most severe during sitting. A few women reported PGAD during pregnancy and premenstrual. The majority of women also reported preexistent or coexistent restless legs syndrome (RLS) and overactive bladder syndrome (OBS). These strongly associated morbidities point into the direction of a clinical cluster, which harbors PGAD or PGAD plus these typical other disorders. Notably, as in RLS and OBS, it appeared that daily treatment with clonazepam 0.5-1.5 mg was effective in 56% of PGAD women. Also, oxazepam 10 mg and tramadol 50 mg elicited PGAD-reducing effect. CONCLUSIONS: PGAD seems to belong to a highly associated disease cluster including morbidities, which share an imperative urge to suppress dysesthesias and paresthesias by firm manipulative actions. PGAD--or as proposed by our group, restless genital syndrome (RGS) in the context of its strong association with restless legs--is probably the expression of a nonsexually driven hyperexcitability of the genitals and subsequent attempts to overcome it by genital manipulations.

Quetiapine and drug interactions: evidence from a routine therapeutic drug monitoring service.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study was to investigate the effect of age, gender, and various comedications on the pharmacokinetics of quetiapine in a naturalistic setting. METHOD: In total, 2111 serum samples analyzed for quetiapine during the period from June 2001 to December 2004 were included in the study. The samples had been collected for routine therapeutic drug monitoring purposes from 1179 patients treated with quetiapine. A log-linear mixed model was used to identify factors influencing the dose-corrected quetiapine serum concentration, expressed as the quetiapine concentration-to-dose (C/D) ratio. Variables included in the analysis were age, gender, and concomitant treatment with a total of 41 drugs most often used in combination with quetiapine. RESULTS: Age >or= 70 years (p = .001) and comedication with alimemazine (p = .002), fluvoxamine (p = .001), citalopram/escitalopram (p = .041), or clozapine (p < .001) significantly increased the serum concentrations of quetiapine, while age < 18 years (p = .044) and comedication with lamotrigine (p = .024), levomepromazine (p = .011), oxazepam (p < .001), or carbamazepine (p < .001) significantly decreased the serum concentrations. The effects were most pronounced for fluvoxamine (+159%), clozapine (+82%), age >or= 70 years (+67%), and carbamaze-pine (-86%). In 18% of the samples, the daily dose exceeded the currently recommended maximum of 800 mg/day. CONCLUSION: Due to the increased serum levels of quetiapine, a lower dose than usual should be considered when quetiapine is administered to elderly patients and to patients comedicated with clozapine or fluvoxamine. As the inducing effect of carbamazepine on quetiapine metabolism is very potent, cotreatment with carbamazepine cannot be recommended. On the basis of our data and pharmacokinetic considerations, the majority of drugs commonly used in psychiatry can safely be given in combination with quetiapine.

Effectiveness and safety of hypnotic drugs in the treatment of insomnia in over 70-year old people.

Good sleep is an important index of the quality of life in people and above all in old subjects. Among all the symptoms reported to general practitioner, insomnia is at the 3(rd) place and this is present in particular in the elderly. In elderly people high comorbidity and polytreatment are often present. We have studied 60 elderly people with history of insomnia and concomitant diseases: depression, dementia and behavioral disturbances. All the patients of the present study were visited in our outpatients' department. Three hypnotic drugs were used for the treatment of insomnia: zolpidem, or triazolam, or oxazepam, respectively at doses of 10mg/day, 0.125-0.25mg/day and 15.0mg/day. All the three drugs showed to be effective and safe; no paradoxical effects were observed.