Scoring the best deal: Quantity discounts and street price variation of diverted oxycodone and oxymorphone.

PURPOSE: Diverted prescription opioids are significant contributors to drug overdose mortality. Street price has been suggested as an economic metric of the diverted prescription opioid black market. This study examined variables that may influence the street price of diverted oxycodone and oxymorphone. METHODS: A cross-sectional study was conducted utilizing data from the previously validated, crowdsourcing website StreetRx. Street price reports of selected oxycodone and oxymorphone products, between August 22, 2014 and June 30, 2016, were considered for analysis. Geometric means and 95% confidence intervals were calculated comparing prices per milligram of drug in US dollars. Univariate and multivariable regressions were used to examine the influence of dosage strength, drug formulation, and bulk purchasing on street price. RESULTS: A total of 5611 oxycodone and 1420 oxymorphone reports were analyzed. Across various dosages and formulations, geometric mean prices per milligram ranged between $0.12 and $1.07 for oxycodone and $0.73 and $2.90 for oxymorphone. For a 2-fold increase in dosage strength, there is a 24.0% (95% CI: -28.1%, -19.6%, P < 0.001) and a 22.5% (95% CI: -24.2%, -20.8%, P < 0.001) decrease on average in price per milligram for oxycodone and oxymorphone, respectively. Lower potency, high dosage strength, crush-resistant opioids, and those purchased in bulk were significantly cheaper. CONCLUSION: Street prices for diverted oxycodone and oxymorphone are influenced by multiple factors including potency, dosage, formulation, and bulk purchasing. Buyers who purchase large quantities of low potency, large dosage, crush-resistant formulation prescription opioids can expect to achieve the lowest price.

Direct and indirect costs of patients treated with extended-release oxymorphone HCl or controlled-release oxycodone HCl.

OBJECTIVE: Compare direct and indirect costs of oxymorphone extended-release ('oxymorphone') and oxycodone controlled-release ('oxycodone') users. METHODS: Patients, aged 18+, with ≥1 claim for oxymorphone/oxycodone, Q2:2006-Q4:2009, were selected from a de-identified private payer claims database and observed from the first such claim ('index date') until the earliest of: use of comparator drug; end of continuous eligibility; 12 months ('study period'). Patients with claims for any formulation of the comparator drug during the first 30 days of the study period were excluded. Direct (medical and drug) costs paid by private insurers were reported for patients aged 18-64 (n = 8354) and 65+(n = 3515), as well as sub-sets without cancer (n = 7090 and n = 2444, respectively). Indirect costs (medically-related absenteeism and disability) were reported for all employees, aged 18-64 (n = 1313), and employees without cancer (n = 1146). Multivariate models were used to estimate risk-adjusted costs controlling for patient characteristics. RESULTS: Oxymorphone users, aged 18-64, had lower drug costs ($693 vs $763, p = 0.0035) and similar medical costs ($1875 vs $1976, p = 0.3570) per patient-month compared with oxycodone users (mean follow-up 236 and 280 days, respectively). Indirect costs were not different ($662 vs $670, p = 0.9370). Oxymorphone users, aged 65+, had similar Medicare supplemental drug costs ($533 vs $588, p = 0.0840) and lower medical costs ($459 vs $747, p < 0.0001). Results were comparable for subsets without cancer. LIMITATIONS: Patients with concomitant use of oxymorphone and oxycodone were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: Oxymorphone users incur lower risk-adjusted costs in several cost categories, compared with oxycodone users, and no higher costs in any of the examined categories.

A comparison of daily average consumption (DACON) of oxycodone and oxymorphone long-acting oral tablets.

BACKGROUND: The utilization of high-potency opioids is an important component of chronic pain management, and appropriate utilization of these medicines is a common concern of payers. Two of the most commonly prescribed oral long-acting opioids, oxycodone controlled-release (CR) and oxymorphone extended-release (ER), are FDA-approved for twice-daily dosing, which equates to a theoretical average consumption (DACON) of 2 tablets per day. DACON values greater than 2 have budget and policy implications for managed care pharmacists. OBJECTIVES: To assess from the perspective of the pharmacy benefit decision maker the DACONs of oxycodone CR and oxymorphone ER. METHODS: The main outcome measure for the analysis was DACON. Pharmacy and medical claims data from a large commercially insured population (i3 InVision Data Mart database) were analyzed to identify patients with at least 1 pharmacy claim for either oxycodone CR or oxymorphone ER from July 1, 2007, to September 30, 2009. After an initial 30-day titration period, all subjects included in the study had 1 or more claims totaling at least a 90-day supply of either study drug during the subsequent 90 days (DACON measurement period). Patients were excluded if there was evidence of a switch from one to the other study opioid during the 90-day measurement period. There were no limitations on the use of other opioids, either short- or long-acting, during either the DACON measurement period or the previous 6 months (baseline period). In addition, patients were excluded if the enrollee was younger than 18 years old, pregnant, did not have continuous insurance coverage for the 6 months before and after the start of the 90-day DACON measurement, or were enrolled in an HMO plan. Bivariate analyses were performed with between-group differences in DACON values assessed using t-tests and Wilcoxon rank sum tests. Patient characteristics including age, sex, geographic location, and baseline Charlson Comorbidity Index (CCI) for each drug group were evaluated descriptively using either the Pearson chi-square test or t-test. Multivariate analyses were conducted using generalized linear models (GLM) to adjust for the observed heterogeneity among patients in the observational database. For the GLMs, the gamma distribution and log link function were chosen to account for non-normal distributions of DACON. Independent variables included study drug, tablet strengths, age, sex, CCI, the maximum days gap between prescription refills during the DACON measurement period, and other opioid medication use. Several sensitivity analyses were conducted to verify all findings. RESULTS: The final analyses were conducted on 6,567 oxycodone CR patients and 796 oxymorphone ER patients. The unadjusted DACON mean value for the highest strength of oxycodone CR 80 milligrams (mg) was 3.9, compared with 2.9 for oxymorphone ER 40 mg (P < 0.001); mean DACON values were 3.0 versus 2.4, respectively, for lower strengths (P < 0.001) and 3.1 versus 2.5 for all strengths (P < 0.001). After adjusting for age, sex, CCI, maximum gap days, and other opioid medication use, a risk-adjusted mean difference in DACON remained, with oxycodone CR patients receiving on average 0.6 tablets more per day than those dispensed oxymorphone ER (P < 0.001). The direction, magnitude, and statistical significance of these differences were essentially unchanged in sensitivity analyses. CONCLUSIONS: On average during a 90-day time period, patients taking oxymorphone ER consumed 0.6 fewer tablets per day than did patients taking oxycodone CR. Further research is necessary to see if this difference amounts to cost savings for health plans that provide prescription reimbursement for patients with chronic pain syndromes.

Comparison of the analgesic efficacy of hydromorphone and oxymorphone in dogs and cats: a randomized blinded study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine if oxymorphone and hydromorphone are equally efficacious as analgesics in both dogs and cats and to determine the side-effects of each drug in painful animals. STUDY DESIGN: Randomized, blinded, clinical trial. ANIMALS: 151 animals (28 cats and 123 dogs) admitted to the intensive care unit requiring mu opioid agonist treatment for a variety of painful procedures. METHODS: Animals were randomized into two groups and received either hydromorphone or oxymorphone as their primary mu agonist agent. All staff and clinicians were blinded as to which drug was administered. Pain scores, side-effects, dose and duration were recorded for each drug dose administered. The study groups were not revealed until the study had been completed and the ensuing manuscript written. Implementation of reversal and rescue protocols were dependent on pain scores and the judgment of the primary clinician. RESULTS: The groups did not significantly differ at randomization or in the number of study drug doses. There were no statistical differences between the dose of drug or the time between each dose, indicating that potency and efficacy was not different between the two drugs. Significantly more animals that received hydromorphone vomited, but there were no other statistical differences in adverse events, or in requirement for rescue or reversal protocols. CONCLUSIONS AND CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Hydromorphone is significantly less expensive than oxymorphone and the results of this trial indicate that the two drugs have a similar clinical value. Both oxymorphone and hydromorphone can be used as primary mu agonist therapy in veterinary patients.