Semaglutide treatment for PRevention Of Toxicity in high-dosE Chemotherapy with autologous haematopoietic stem-cell Transplantation (PROTECT): study protocol for a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, investigator-initiated study.

INTRODUCTION: Cancer treatment with high-dose chemotherapy damages the mucosal barrier of the gastrointestinal (GI) tract and is associated with severe toxicity involving mucositis, severe inflammation and organ dysfunction. Currently, there is no effective prophylaxis against this. Glucagon-like peptide 1 (GLP-1), a well-known regulator of blood glucose, has been suggested in mouse studies to possess trophic effects on gut epithelial cells as well as anti-inflammatory properties. In line with this, endogenous GLP-1 levels have been shown to be inversely correlated with toxicities after haematopoietic stem cell transplantation (HSCT) and treatment with a GLP-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) was shown to limit chemotherapy-induced mucositis in rodents. This present study investigates the effects of the GLP-1RA semaglutide on GI mucositis severity score in patients with lymphoma undergoing high-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous (auto) HSCT. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a randomised, double-blind, placebo-controlled, two-centre investigator-initiated clinical study. Forty adult patients with malignant lymphoma referred for auto-HSCT will be randomised in a 1:1 manner to receive either semaglutide or placebo once-weekly for 8 weeks. This includes a run-in period of 3-4 weeks with semaglutide 0.25 mg prior to high-dose chemotherapy treatment followed by a period of 4-5 weeks with semaglutide 0.5 mg including the 1 week of high-dose chemotherapy treatment. Clinical assessment of endpoint measurements and safety will be performed weekly during treatment and in a follow-up period of 10 weeks. The primary endpoint is GI mucositis severity (mean severity grade (0-II) during week 1-4 after auto-HSCT). Secondary endpoints include C-reactive protein increment, quality of life and safety. Fever, bacteraemia, antibiotic use, weight loss, morphine consumption, duration of hospitalisation, use of parenteral nutrition, change in muscle mass and clinical and laboratory evidence of organ toxicities will also be assessed. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: The study complies with Danish and European Union legislation and is approved by the Danish Medicines Agency, the Danish National Medical Research Ethics Committee (EU CT #2022-502139-20-00) and the Danish Data Protection Agency. The study is monitored by the Capital Region of Denmark's good clinical practice unit. All results, positive, negative and inconclusive, will be disseminated at national and international scientific meetings and in peer-reviewed scientific journals. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: NCT06449625.

Bioengineered Nanomedicines Targeting the Intestinal Fc Receptor Achieve the Improved Glucoregulatory Effect of Semaglutide in a Type 2 Diabetic Mice Model.

The oral administration of the glucagon-like peptide-1 analogue, semaglutide, remains a hurdle due to its limited bioavailability. Herein, neonatal Fc receptor (FcRn)-targeted nanoparticles (NPs) were designed to enhance the oral delivery of semaglutide. The nanocarriers were covalently linked to the FcRn-binding peptide FcBP or the affibody molecule ZFcRn that specifically binds to the human FcRn (hFcRn) in a pH-dependent manner. These FcRn-targeted ligands were selected over the endogenous ligands of the receptor (albumin and IgG) due to their smaller size and simpler structure, which could facilitate the transport of functionalized NPs through the tissues. The capacity of FcRn-targeted semaglutide-NPs in controlling the blood glucose levels was evaluated in an hFcRn transgenic mice model, where type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) was induced via intraperitoneal injection of nicotinamide followed by streptozotocin. The encapsulation of semaglutide into FcRn-targeted NPs was translated in an improved glucoregulatory effect in T2DM-induced mice when compared to the oral free semaglutide or nontargeted NP groups, after daily oral administrations for 7 days. Notably, a similar glucose-lowering response was observed between both FcRn-targeted NPs and the subcutaneous semaglutide groups. An increase in insulin pancreatic content and a recovery in ß cell mass were visualized in the mice treated with FcRn-targeted semaglutide-NPs. The biodistribution of fluorescently labeled NPs through the gastrointestinal tract demonstrated that the nanosystems targeting the hFcRn are retained longer in the ileum and colorectum, where the expression of FcRn is more prevalent, than nontargeted NPs. Therefore, FcRn-targeted nanocarriers proved to be an effective platform for improving the pharmacological effect of semaglutide in a T2DM-induced mice model.

[New outcome studies with injectable semaglutide in different at risk populations]. / L'étude clinique du mois. Nouvelles études cliniques avec le sémaglutide injectable dans différentes populations à risque.

Injectable semaglutide at a dose of 1 mg once weekly has been shown to be the most efficacious glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist when considering both the improvement in blood glucose control and the reduction in body weight in patients with type 2 diabetes (T2D). After the SUSTAIN-6 study, published in 2016, which demonstrated not only the good safety but also already the cardiovascular (CV) efficacy of semaglutide in patients with T2D and high CV risk, several large placebo-controlled randomised trials have confirmed improved prognosis with semaglutide in different at risk populations : patients with T2D and chronic kidney disease (FLOW trial), subjects with obesity and heart failure with preserved ejection fraction, with or without T2D (STEP-HFpEF trial) and people with overweight or obesity (but without T2D) and a confirmed atheromatous cardiovascular disease (SELECT trial). Studies performed in patients with obesity used a higher dose of 2.4 mg/week. These positive results, based upon major clinically relevant outcomes, extend the therapeutic possibilities with semaglutide among at high risk patients of cardiovascular and/or renal diseases.

Le sémaglutide injectable à la dose de 1 mg/semaine s'est révélé être l'agoniste des récepteurs de glucagon-like peptide-1 (ARGLP-1) le plus efficace en termes de contrôle glycémique et de perte de poids chez des patients avec un diabète de type 2 (DT2). Après l'étude SUSTAIN-6, publiée en 2016, ayant démontré la bonne sécurité et déjà l'efficacité cardiovasculaire (CV) du sémaglutide chez des patients avec DT2 à haut risque CV, plusieurs grands essais contrôlés ont prouvé une amélioration du pronostic dans différentes populations à risque : patients avec DT2 et maladie rénale chronique (étude FLOW), sujets avec obèsité et avec une insuffisance cardiaque à fraction d'éjection préservée (avec ou sans DT2) (étude STEP-HFpEF) et personnes avec un surpoids ou une obésité (mais sans DT2) et une maladie CV avérée (étude SELECT). Les études dans l'obésité ont été menées avec une posologie de 2,4 mg/semaine de sémaglutide. Ces résultats positifs, basés sur des critères de jugement cliniques majeurs, étendent donc les possibilités thérapeutiques offertes par le sémaglutide chez des patients à haut risque de maladies CV et/ou rénales.

NOVEL AGENTS IN THE MANAGEMENT OF DIABETES AND RISK OF WORSENING DIABETIC RETINOPATHY.

PURPOSE: Novel therapies for diabetes have potent effects on glycemic control, obesity, and cardiovascular risk reduction, but some, including the popular drug semaglutide, have also been implicated in worsening of diabetic retinopathy (DR). Given the ubiquity of these new agents, understanding the risks to vision is important. Here, we review the data for several newly available agents in terms of systemic efficacy and retinal safety. METHODS: Literature review. RESULTS: Novel antihyperglycemic treatments include incretin mimetics and enhancers, sodium-glucose cotransporter inhibitors, long-acting insulins, and insulin delivery systems. All improve glycemic control, and some have been shown to reduce major cardiovascular outcomes. In a pivotal trial, semaglutide was associated with approximately 75% increased risk of DR worsening. The novel long-acting insulin icodec, formulated for once weekly dosing, showed increased risk of DR worsening over a once daily insulin. No other recent antihyperglycemic agent was associated with DR worsening, although following the semaglutide trials, nearly all studies excluded patients with preexisting DR. Cases of DR worsening were rare in all instances. Dedicated safety studies for semaglutide in DR are currently underway. CONCLUSION: For most patients being considered for treatment with a novel antihyperglycemic agent, benefits on systemic metabolic and cardiovascular health are very likely to outweigh potential retinal harms. Although the true risks of the new agents on DR are unclear because their safety data come from secondary end points, the most vulnerable patients are those with preexisting high-risk DR, poor baseline glycemic control, and using insulin.

Improved Clinical Outcomes with the Combination Therapy of a Glucagon-like Peptide-1 Receptor Agonists and a Sodium-glucose Cotransporter-2 Inhibitor in Overweight/Obese People with Type 2 Diabetes: Real-world Evidence from the Indian Subcontinent.

OBJECTIVE: Type 2 diabetes (T2D) mellitus is increasing exponentially in India, with overweight/obesity being prime contributors. This study aimed at assessing the clinical impact of the combination therapy of a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist (GLP-1RA) injection (inj.) and a sodium-glucose cotransporter-2 inhibitor (SGLT-2i) in overweight/obese patients from the Indian subcontinent. METHODS: In two real-world evidence (RWE) studies (RWE1 and 2), we retrospectively observed the effect of the combination therapy of a GLP-1RA, injection dulaglutide (DU) 1.5 mg/week, and an SGLT-2i, canagliflozin (CAN) 100 mg/day at weeks 16, 32, and 52 on HbA1c, body weight (weight), systolic blood pressure (SBP), lipids, change in doses of antidiabetic agents (ADA) and antihypertensive agents (AHA) in overweight/obese Asian Indian subjects with T2D, who had suboptimal glycemic control. RESULTS: A total of 95 T2D patients [51 males (M), 44 females (F)] completed the two RWE studies. In RWE 1, 40 patients (20 M/20 F), mean [standard deviation (SD)] age 49.4 (10.7) years (Y), weight 92.6 (6.6) kg, body mass index (BMI) 30.6 (2.3) kg/m2, duration of T2D 8.1 (3.2) Y, completed the study. At week 32, the mean (SD) reduction in A1c (%) was -1.3% [8.4 (0.7) to 7.1 (0.3); p < 0.01] and mean (SD) weight (kg) loss was -5.5 [92.6 (6.6) to 87.9 (7.02); p < 0.00001]. This group was then followed up until week 52. In RWE 2, 55 patients (31 M/24 F), age 51 (5.8) Y, weight 92.6 ± 3.4 kg, BMI 31.1 ± 2.1 kg/m2, SBP 142.4 ± 3.9 mm Hg, estimated glomerular filtration rate (eGFR) 62 ± 5 mL/minute/1.73 m2, with 8.4 ± 3.3 Y duration of diabetes met the inclusion criteria. In 71% of subjects, A1c decreased by -1.4% [8.5 ± 0.4 to 7.1 ± 0.2; p < 0.0001] at week 16 and was 6.8 ± 0.3 (p = 0.0002) in 18% at week 32. CONCLUSION: A statistically significant (SS) improvement in glycemic control, weight, and improvement in cardiovascular (CV) risk factors was observed with the GLP-1RA/SGLT-2i combination, which was well tolerated.

Dual effects of dulaglutide on glycemic control and knee osteoarthritis pain in elderly patients with Type 2 diabetes.

Aim: This study aims to evaluate the dual benefits of dulaglutide in improving glycemic control and reducing knee OA pain.Patients & methods: Elderly T2DM patients diagnosed with bilateral knee OA on conventional OA treatment for at least 3 months were studied for their glycemic metrics, OA pain scores and NSAID consumption at baseline, 3 months and 6 months.Results: Significant improvements in glycemic control were observed, HbA1c decreased from 8.7% to 6.5% over 6 months. Pain scores, NSAID, body weight and BMI showed substantial reductions over time. Positive correlation (r = 0.73, p < 0.001) was found between glycemic control and pain reduction.Conclusion: Dulaglutide improves glycemic control, knee joint OA pain and weight management in elderly patients with T2DM.

What is this article about? We looked into how well dulaglutide works to both control blood sugar and reduce knee pain in people with type 2 Diabetes and osteoarthritis. This could be a useful treatment for older patients dealing with both conditions.What were the results? The most relevant findings were:Better Blood Sugar Control: After using dulaglutide for three and 6 months, there were noticeable improvements in blood sugar levels.Less Knee Pain: People experienced less knee pain from osteoarthritis and used fewer painkillers.Weight Loss: The average body weight and body mass index (BMI) decreased with this treatment.Pain Relief Linked to Better Blood Sugar: As blood sugar levels improved, knee pain from osteoarthritis also lessened. What do the results of the study mean? The results showed that elderly T2DM patients prescribed with dulaglutide would be able to achieve improved glycemic control, knee joint OA pain and weight management.

Sodium glycocholate liposome encapsulated semaglutide increases oral bioavailability by promoting intestinal absorption.

The aim of this study was to prepare sodium glycocholate liposomes (SGC-Lip) encapsulating semaglutide (Sml) to improve oral bioavailability and better exert hypoglycemic effect. In this paper, SGC-Lip was prepared by reverse-phase evaporation method with particle size around 140 nm, potential around -27 mV, rounded morphology and better stability. The hypoglycemic and intestinal uptake effects of SGC-Lip and cholesterol-containing liposomes (CH-Lip) were comparatively investigated in rats, and the oral safety of SGC-Lip was examined by cytotoxicity assay. The results indicate that SGC-Lip can achieve a hypoglycemic effect of 40% of the initial value within 12 hours, and the AAC0-12h is approximately six times that of CH-Lip without sodium glycocholate. The results of the cytotoxicity tests indicate that SGC-Lip has good oral safety. SGC-Lip enhances the absorption of semaglutide in the small intestinal villi via an apical sodium-dependent bile acid transporter (ASBT)-mediated pathway with the highest penetration at the ileal site. In summary, the oral bioavailability of semaglutide can be improved by encapsulating semaglutide in SGC-Lip and utilizing the stabilizing and permeation-promoting effects of SGC on liposomes.

Semaglutide use in people with obesity and type 2 diabetes from real-world utilization data: An analysis of the All of US Program.

AIM: To analyse data from the All of Us Research Program to evaluate the real-world application and long-term effectiveness of semaglutide in treating type 2 diabetes and obesity patients in a large population. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We identified patients prescribed semaglutide and analysed differences in route of administration and the time on semaglutide. For individuals diagnosed with obesity, we measured changes in body mass index (BMI) and weight from baseline, while measured changes in HbA1c for those patients with type 2 diabetes. We also examined the occurrence of newly diagnosed common adverse events from taking semaglutide. RESULTS: For 3739 semaglutide patients, those on injectable semaglutide (3364 patients) averaged 301.54 days on the medication, with 20.36% having no end date, while those on oral semaglutide (435 patients) averaged 172.48 days, with 24.60% having no end date. We found average decreases of 1.54 kg/m2 in BMI, 4.65 kg in weight and 0.75% in HbA1c for semaglutide users. The decreases were larger in participants taking injectable formulation, probably because of higher starting values. Over time, improvements in these outcomes diminished, but the values remained significantly lower than baseline levels. Approximately only 1.0% of patients reported newly diagnosed common adverse events. CONCLUSIONS: Consistent with clinical trial findings, this real-world data analysis showed that semaglutide was well tolerated and that, for a large population, it effectively reduced BMI, body weight and HbA1c, albeit to smaller magnitudes than observed in clinical trials. These findings provide valuable insights into real-world experience and the long-term effectiveness of semaglutide.

Beneficial effect of oral semaglutide for type 2 diabetes mellitus in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease: A prospective, multicentre, observational study.

AIMS: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of oral semaglutide for type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) in patients with metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This was a single-arm, multicentre, prospective study. Among 80 consecutive patients with MASLD and T2DM who newly received oral semaglutide, 70 completed 48-week oral semaglutide treatment as scheduled and were included in an efficacy analysis. Dose adjustments of oral semaglutide were determined by each physician while monitoring efficacy and adverse events. RESULTS: Significant improvements in body weight, liver enzymes, lipid profile, and glycaemic control were found at 48 weeks compared with baseline values (all p < 0.01). Controlled attenuation parameter values significantly decreased from baseline to 48 weeks (p < 0.01). Changes in alanine aminotransferase concentrations (r = 0.37, p < 0.01) and controlled attenuation parameter values (r = 0.44, p < 0.01) were significantly correlated with changes in body weight. Liver fibrosis markers, such as type IV collagen 7S, Wisteria floribunda agglutinin-positive Mac-2-binding protein, fibrosis-4 index, and liver stiffness measurement, significantly decreased from baseline to 48 weeks (all p < 0.01). The most common adverse events were Grades 1-2 transient gastrointestinal symptoms, such as nausea (23 patients, 28.8%), dyspepsia (12, 15.0%) and appetite loss (4, 5.0%). CONCLUSIONS: Oral semaglutide treatment for T2DM in patients with MASLD leads to an improvement in liver steatosis and injury, surrogate markers of fibrosis, diabetic status, and lipid profile, and reduces body weight.

Impact of baseline characteristics on the efficacy of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide among participants with type 2 diabetes: A post hoc analysis of SUSTAIN China.

AIMS: To investigate the impact of baseline characteristics on the efficacy of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg in participants with type 2 diabetes (T2D) from the SUSTAIN China trial. METHODS: In this post hoc analysis, data for semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg versus sitagliptin 100 mg were analysed in the total (n = 868) and Chinese-only (n = 605) populations. Changes from baseline to end of treatment (EOT) in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1c) and body weight were analysed by baseline age, sex, body mass index, HbA1c, diabetes duration, and homeostatic model assessment of ß-cell function (HOMA-ß) tertile. Proportions of participants achieving HbA1c <7.0% (53 mmol/mol) by baseline HbA1c, change from baseline to EOT in standard deviation of seven-point self-monitored plasma glucose (SMPG), derived time-in-range (dTIR) of seven-point SMPG at Week 30, and HOMA-ß ratio to baseline at Week 30 were assessed for both populations. RESULTS: In both populations the efficacy of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg versus sitagliptin was not significantly affected by most of the baseline characteristics studied. The proportion of participants achieving the target HbA1c <7% was not affected by baseline HbA1c (pinteraction > 0.05). SMPG fluctuation and dTIR indicated less glucose variability in participants treated with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg versus sitagliptin, and the HOMA-ß ratios to baseline at EOT were greater with semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg versus sitagliptin (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: These results support the effectiveness of once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 0.5 and 1.0 mg across a broad range of baseline characteristics, in participants with T2D from SUSTAIN China.

Subcutaneous Semaglutide during Breastfeeding: Infant Safety Regarding Drug Transfer into Human Milk.

Postpartum mothers and their healthcare providers often face the challenge of limited data regarding the safety of drug therapies during lactation. Pregnancy can lead to sustained weight gain, and obesity can negatively impact both physical and psychological well-being. The introduction of GLP-1 agonists to augment weight loss has become a topic of interest for many postpartum mothers. Our study aims to investigate the transmission of semaglutide into human milk in the first steps to ensure the safety and health of both lactating mothers and their breastfed infants. Semaglutide quantification was performed using high-resolution liquid chromatography-mass spectrometry. InfantRisk Center Human Milk biorepository released milk samples from eight women collected at 0, 12 and 24 h post-semaglutide administration. Semaglutide was extracted using protein precipitation in methanol, followed by chromatographic separation. Linear calibration curves for the method ranged between 2.5-30 ng/mL, with a limit of detection of 1.7 ng/mL and a limit of quantification of 5.7 ng/mL (LLOQ). Semaglutide was not detected in any of the collected human milk samples. A worst-case scenario of the relative infant dose (RID) was calculated using the LLOQ as the drug concentration in milk when considering semaglutide's bioavailability and long-acting dose profile. The maximum RID projected was 1.26%, far below the standard 10% safety threshold. While questions about long-term infant outcomes, the safety of maternal nutrient intake, and the nutrient content of breast milk remain, our findings suggest that semaglutide concentrations in human milk are unlikely to pose clinical concerns for breastfed infants. These results support healthcare providers in making informed decisions regarding postpartum therapeutic interventions.

PIONEER REAL UK: A Multi-Centre, Prospective, Real-World Study of Once-Daily Oral Semaglutide Use in Adults with Type 2 Diabetes.

INTRODUCTION: Oral semaglutide provides an alternative to injectable glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1RAs) for treatment of type 2 diabetes (T2D). The PIONEER REAL studies evaluate clinical outcomes of oral semaglutide treatment of T2D in a real-world setting. PIONEER REAL UK focused on adults living with T2D in the UK. METHODS: The multi-centre, prospective and non-interventional single-arm study enrolled 333 participants and followed them for 34-44 weeks. Participants were treated as part of routine clinical practice and had not been previously treated with injectable glucose-lowering medication. The primary endpoint was change in glycated haemoglobin (HbA1C) from baseline to end of study (EOS). Secondary endpoints included change in body weight, proportion of participants with HbA1C < 7% (53 mmol/mol) at EOS and proportion of participants with ≥ 1%-point HbA1C reduction and body weight reduction of ≥ 3% or ≥ 5% at EOS. Treatment satisfaction was assessed by Diabetes Treatment Satisfaction Questionnaire (DTSQ) status and change. RESULTS: Of 333 participants, 299 completed the study and 227 were on treatment at EOS. People treated with oral semaglutide experienced significantly reduced HbA1C by an estimated change of - 1.1%-points (95% CI - 1.27 to - 0.96; P < 0.0001) or - 12.2 mmol/mol (CI - 13.87 to - 10.47; P < 0.0001). Estimated change in body weight was - 4.8 kg (CI - 5.47 to - 4.12; P < 0.0001). At EOS, an HbA1C level < 7% (53 mmol/mol) was recorded in 46.3% of participants. A ≥ 1%-point reduction in HbA1C combined with a ≥ 3% reduction in body weight was observed in 36.4% of participants, and 27.1% had a ≥ 1%-point reduction in HbA1C and a ≥ 5% body weight reduction. Treatment satisfaction improved significantly during the study. No new safety concerns or cases of severe hypoglycaemia were reported. CONCLUSION: People living with T2D in the UK experienced a meaningful decrease in HbA1C and body weight after initiation of oral semaglutide treatment. No new safety issues were observed. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04862923. Graphical plain language summary available for this article.

PIONEER REAL UK investigated the use of a tablet form of the medicine semaglutide in people living with type 2 diabetes in the UK. The purpose was to determine how well the tablet works for blood sugar control and weight loss in everyday clinical practice. The study followed 333 participants whose doctors had given them semaglutide tablets. Their blood sugar levels and body weight were measured before and after taking the semaglutide tablet for 34­44 weeks. The participants were also asked to fill out questionnaires about their treatment satisfaction and how it changed when taking the semaglutide tablet. The participants' blood sugar levels dropped a lot, and body weight was lowered by an average of 4.8 kg during the 34­44 weeks of the study. The participants were also more satisfied with their treatment at the end of the study than before taking the semaglutide tablet. Doctors treating the participants found the treatment to be a success in more than two-thirds of participants. The study also found that the semaglutide tablet was not associated with cases of too low blood sugar and was generally well tolerated. In summary, the semaglutide tablet is a good option for people living with type 2 diabetes who need better blood sugar control and would benefit from weight loss. The treatment is generally well tolerated, and people are very satisfied with it.

Effects of Semaglutide on Heart Failure Outcomes in Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease in the FLOW Trial.

BACKGROUND: People with type 2 diabetes (T2D) and chronic kidney disease (CKD) are at high risk for heart failure (HF) and premature death from cardiovascular (CV) causes. The FLOW (Research Study To See How Semaglutide Works Compared to Placebo in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease), which enrolled participants with T2D and CKD, demonstrated that semaglutide, a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonist, reduced the incidence of the primary composite outcome (persistent ≥50% decline in estimated glomerular filtration rate, persistent estimated glomerular filtration rate <15 mL/min/1.73 m2, kidney replacement therapy, and kidney or CV death) by 24%. OBJECTIVES: This prespecified analysis examined the effects of semaglutide on HF outcomes in this high-risk population. METHODS: Participants were randomized (1:1) to once-weekly subcutaneous semaglutide 1 mg or placebo. The prespecified main outcome was a composite of HF events (new onset or worsening of HF leading to an unscheduled hospital admission or an urgent visit, with initiation of or intensified diuretic/vasoactive therapy) or CV death. HF data were collected by the investigator. CV death was adjudicated by an independent committee. RESULTS: A total of 3,533 randomized participants were followed for a median of 3.4 years. HF was present at baseline in 342 participants (19.4%) in the semaglutide group and 336 (19.0%) in the placebo group. In the overall trial population, semaglutide increased time to first HF events or CV death (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.62-0.87; P = 0.0005), HF events alone (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.58-0.92; P = 0.0068), and CV death alone (HR: 0.71; 95% CI: 0.56-0.89; P = 0.0036). The risk reduction for the composite HF outcome was similar in those with (HR: 0.73; 95% CI: 0.54-0.98; P = 0.0338) and without (HR: 0.72; 95% CI: 0.58-0.89; P = 0.0028) HF at baseline. The risk of HF outcomes (HF events or CV death) was generally higher in participants categorized as NYHA functional class III and those with the HF reduced ejection fraction subtype, regardless of treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Semaglutide substantially reduced the risk of time to first composite outcome of HF events or CV death, as well as HF events and CV death alone, in a high-risk population with T2D and CKD. These effects were consistent regardless of history of HF. (A Research Study To See How Semaglutide Works Compared to Placebo in People With Type 2 Diabetes and Chronic Kidney Disease [FLOW]; NCT03819153).

Effect of Semaglutide on Cardiac Structure and Function in Patients With Obesity-Related Heart Failure.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is associated with adverse cardiac remodeling and is a key driver for the development and progression of heart failure (HF). Once-weekly semaglutide (2.4 mg) has been shown to improve HF-related symptoms and physical limitations, body weight, and exercise function in patients with obesity-related heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF), but the effects of semaglutide on cardiac structure and function in this population remain unknown. OBJECTIVES: In this echocardiography substudy of the STEP-HFpEF Program, we evaluated treatment effects of once-weekly semaglutide (2.4 mg) vs placebo on cardiac structure and function. METHODS: Echocardiography at randomization and 52 weeks was performed in 491 of 1,145 participants (43%) in the STEP-HFpEF Program (pooled STEP-HFpEF [Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity and HFpEF] and STEP-HFpEF DM [Semaglutide Treatment Effect in People with Obesity, HFpEF, and Type 2 Diabetes] trials). The prespecified primary outcome was change in left atrial (LA) volume, with changes in other echocardiography parameters evaluated as secondary outcomes. Treatment effects of semaglutide vs placebo were assessed using analysis of covariance stratified by trial and body mass index, with adjustment for baseline parameter values. RESULTS: Overall, baseline clinical and echocardiographic characteristics were balanced among those receiving semaglutide (n = 253) and placebo (n = 238). Between baseline and 52 weeks, semaglutide attenuated progression of LA remodeling (estimated mean difference [EMD] in LA volume, -6.13 mL; 95% CI: -9.85 to -2.41 mL; P = 0.0013) and right ventricular (RV) enlargement (EMD in RV end-diastolic area: -1.99 cm2; 95% CI: -3.60 to -0.38 cm2; P = 0.016; EMD in RV end-systolic area: -1.41 cm2; 95% CI: -2.42 to -0.40] cm2; P = 0.0064) compared with placebo. Semaglutide additionally improved E-wave velocity (EMD: -5.63 cm/s; 95% CI: -9.42 to -1.84 cm/s; P = 0.0037), E/A (early/late mitral inflow velocity) ratio (EMD: -0.14; 95% CI: -0.24 to -0.04; P = 0.0075), and E/e' (early mitral inflow velocity/early diastolic mitral annular velocity) average (EMD: -0.79; 95% CI: -1.60 to 0.01; P = 0.05). These associations were not modified by diabetes or atrial fibrillation status. Semaglutide did not significantly affect left ventricular dimensions, mass, or systolic function. Greater weight loss with semaglutide was associated with greater reduction in LA volume (Pinteraction = 0.033) but not with changes in E-wave velocity, E/e' average, or RV end-diastolic area. CONCLUSIONS: In the STEP-HFpEF Program echocardiography substudy, semaglutide appeared to improve adverse cardiac remodeling compared with placebo, further suggesting that treatment with semaglutide may be disease modifying among patients with obesity-related HFpEF. (Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity [STEP-HFpEF]; NCT04788511; Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes [STEP-HFpEF DM]; NCT04916470).

Atrial Fibrillation and Semaglutide Effects in Obesity-Related Heart Failure With Preserved Ejection Fraction: STEP-HFpEF Program.

BACKGROUND: Obesity is a key factor in the development and progression of both heart failure with preserved ejection fraction (HFpEF) and atrial fibrillation (AF). In the STEP-HFpEF Program (comprising the STEP-HFpEF [Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity] and STEP-HFpEF DM [Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes] trials), once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg improved HF-related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function and reduced body weight in patients with obesity-related HFpEF. Whether the effects of semaglutide in this patient group differ in participants with and without AF (and across various AF types) has not been fully examined. OBJECTIVES: The goals of this study were: 1) to evaluate baseline characteristics and clinical features of patients with obesity-related HFpEF with and without a history of AF; and 2) to determine if the efficacy of semaglutide across all key trial outcomes are influenced by baseline history of AF (and AF types) in the STEP-HFpEF Program. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of pooled data from the STEP-HFpEF and STEP-HFpEF DM trials. Patients with heart failure, left ventricular ejection fraction ≥45%, body mass index ≥30 kg/m2, and Kansas City Cardiomyopathy Questionnaire-Clinical Summary Score (KCCQ-CSS) <90 points were randomized 1:1 to receive once-weekly semaglutide 2.4 mg or matching placebo for 52 weeks. Dual primary endpoints (change in KCCQ-CSS and percent change in body weight), confirmatory secondary endpoints (change in 6-minute walk distance; hierarchical composite endpoint comprising all-cause death, HF events, thresholds of change in KCCQ-CSS, and 6-minute walk distance; and C-reactive protein [CRP]), and exploratory endpoint (change in N-terminal pro-B-type natriuretic peptide [NT-proBNP]) were examined according to investigator-reported history of AF (yes/no). Responder analyses examined the proportions of patients who experienced a ≥5-, ≥10, ≥15, and ≥20-point improvement in KCCQ-CSS per history of AF. RESULTS: Of the 1,145 participants, 518 (45%) had a history of AF (40% paroxysmal, 24% persistent AF, and 35% permanent AF) and 627 (55%) did not. Participants with (vs without) AF were older, more often male, had higher NT-proBNP levels, included a higher proportion of those with NYHA functional class III symptoms, and used more antithrombotic therapies, beta-blockers, and diuretics. Semaglutide led to larger improvements in KCCQ-CSS (11.5 points [95% CI: 8.3-14.8] vs 4.3 points [95% CI: 1.3-7.2]; P interaction = 0.001) and the hierarchal composite endpoint (win ratio of 2.25 [95% CI: 1.79-2.83] vs 1.30 [95% CI: 1.06-1.59]; P interaction < 0.001) in participants with AF vs without AF, respectively. The proportions of patients receiving semaglutide vs those receiving placebo experiencing ≥5-, ≥10-, ≥15-, and ≥20-point improvement in KCCQ-CSS were also higher in those with (vs without) AF (all P interaction values <0.05). Semaglutide consistently reduced CRP, NT-proBNP, and body weight regardless of AF status (all P interaction values not significant). There were fewer serious adverse events and serious cardiac disorders in participants treated with semaglutide vs placebo irrespective of AF history. CONCLUSIONS: In the STEP-HFpEF Program, AF was observed in nearly one-half of patients with obesity-related HFpEF and was associated with several features of more advanced HF. Treatment with semaglutide led to significant improvements in HF-related symptoms, physical limitations, and exercise function, as well as reductions in weight, CRP, and NT-proBNP in people with and without AF and across AF types. The magnitude of semaglutide-mediated improvements in HF-related symptoms and physical limitations was more pronounced in those with AF vs without AF at baseline. (Research Study to Investigate How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure and Obesity [STEP-HFpEF; NCT04788511]; Research Study to Look at How Well Semaglutide Works in People Living With Heart Failure, Obesity and Type 2 Diabetes [STEP-HFpEF DM; NCT04916470]).

Semaglutide and blood pressure: an individual patient data meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND AND AIMS: Randomized clinical trials (RCTs) assessing semaglutide reported reductions of systolic blood pressure (SBP) in trial populations with baseline blood pressure in the normotensive range. This study aimed to determine whether this SBP reduction is greater in hypertensive groups. METHODS: Individual patient data (IPD) from three RCTs examining the effect of semaglutide 2.4 mg on body weight over 68 weeks were included. Trial participants were categorized according to a hypertension diagnosis, treatment or baseline measurement (HTN), baseline SBP > 130 mmHg (HTN130) or >140 mmHg (HTN140), and those with apparent resistant hypertension (RH). The primary analysis compared the in-trial change in SBP in the semaglutide and placebo arms. Alterations of anti-hypertensive medications were quantified by treatment intensity score and compared between arms. These analyses were performed using analysis of covariance. RESULTS: Overall, 3136 participants were included. The difference in SBP change between the treatment (n = 2109) and placebo (n = 1027) groups was -4.95 mmHg [95% confidence interval (CI) -5.86 to -4.05] overall. This difference was -4.78 mmHg (95% CI -5.97 to -3.59) for HTN, -4.93 mmHg (95% CI -6.75 to -3.11) for HTN130, -4.09 mmHg (95% CI -7.12 to -1.06) for HTN140, and -3.16 mmHg (95% CI -8.69-2.37) for RH. Reduction in SBP was mediated substantially by weight loss. The anti-hypertensive treatment intensity score decreased for those on semaglutide compared to placebo (-0.51; 95% CI -0.71 to -0.32). CONCLUSIONS: This IPD analysis of three large RCTs found blood pressure reductions with semaglutide in participants with hypertension that were similar to those seen in all trial participants. This finding may in part be due to concurrent reductions to anti-hypertensive medications. These results suggest that semaglutide is a useful adjunctive treatment for patients with hypertension and obesity.

The effectiveness of 0.5 mg and 1mg of semaglutide in patients with type two diabetes and predictors of response: a retrospective cohort study.

Background: Semaglutide is a glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists (GLP-1-RAs) approved for the treatment of type 2 diabetes mellitus (T2DM) at doses up to 1 mg. The results from randomized control trials and real-world studies revealed that weekly semaglutide was associated with significant improvements in HbA1c and body weight. To our knowledge, no study assessed the effectiveness of using semaglutide for patients with T2DM in the Saudi population. We aim to assess the effectiveness of once weekly SC 0.5 and 1 mg of semaglutide on HbA1c and weight reduction in patients with T2DM in the Saudi population within 12 months of use, evaluate the predictors of response, and compare the effect of the two doses. Method: This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at Security Force Hospital in Riyadh, Saudi Arabia. Using electronic medical records of patients with type two diabetes who received semaglutide 0.5 or 1 mg for a total duration of at least 12 months of use. Results: Within the study period of semaglutide use, HbA1c significantly decreased from baseline by -2.1% (-2.3 to -1.91, 95% CI) (P <0.001). While the mean change in weight was -6.19 kg (-6.66 to -5.72, 95% CI) (P<0.001). Moreover, BMI, FBG, total cholesterol, LDL, and TG all decreased significantly from baseline (p<0.001). When comparing the sub-groups of 0.5 and 1 mg doses, although results were numerically favorable of 1 mg, there were no statistically significant differences in HbA1c % (-2.1 ± 1.8 vs. -2.1 ± 1.9, p-value= 0.934, respectively), and weight (-6.1 ± 5 vs. -6.2 ± 4.4 kg, p-value=0.837, respectively). Significant predictors of HbA1c reduction were the duration of DM, baseline HbA1c, and insulin therapy. While the significant predictor for weight reduction was insulin therapy. Conclusion: This study is document the effectiveness of once-weekly SC semaglutide on glycemic control and weight loss in real-world practice. We recommend a starting goal dose of 0.5 mg and gradual increase of dose based individual patient response. further studies are needed to assess the effectiveness and tolerability of various semagltude doses.

Real-World Use of Semaglutide for Weight Management: Patient Characteristics and Dose Titration-A Danish Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVE: To determine patient characteristics and dose titration patterns of real-world semaglutide (Wegovy) users. RESEARCH DESIGN AND METHODS: We used a population-based cohort study including Danish adults who filled semaglutide prescriptions from 12 December 2022 to 31 December 2023. Outcomes were patient characteristics, prescriber type, and dose titration patterns. RESULTS: We identified 110,748 individuals (median age 49 years; 70% female) filling 773,708 prescriptions for semaglutide. General practitioners initiated treatment in 86%. Common comorbidities included hypertension (30%), dyslipidemia (17%), and arthrosis (17%). Only 13% reached the maximum dose of 2.4 mg by their fifth prescription, while 5.7% stopped after the first prescription. Few users (10%) followed recommended dose increases every 4 weeks. Overall, 25% filled at least one prescription of 2.4 mg, while 33-48% continued with the 1.0-mg dosage from the fourth prescription onward. CONCLUSIONS: Real-world semaglutide users generally resembled trial participants, but few follow the dose titration schemes tested in premarket clinical trials.