Comparison of corneal endothelial cell density reduction between primary open-angle glaucoma and pseudo-exfoliation glaucoma patients at 3 years after Ex-Press® surgery.

PURPOSE: We compared corneal endothelial cell (CED) loss after Ex-Press (EXP) surgery between patients with primary open-angle glaucoma (POAG) and pseudo-exfoliation glaucoma (PEX). PATIENTS AND METHODS: This was a single-facility retrospective study. We included glaucoma patients who had undergone EXP surgery and were followed up > 3 years. We measured the CED before and after (at 12, 24, and 36 months) EXP surgery by noncontact specular microscopy and compared the means of the CED values and CED survival ratios after EXP surgery by paired t-test. RESULTS: We included 119 eyes that underwent EXP surgery, including 60 POAG eyes and 59 PEX eyes. In the POAG group, the mean CED decreased from 2389 ± 321 at baseline to 2230 ± 424 cells/mm2 after 3 years. In the PEX group, the mean CED decreased from 2111 ± 510 at baseline to 1845 ± 628 cells/mm2 after 3 years. At the 3-year follow-up, the CED survival ratio was 93.3 ± 12.5% in the POAG group and significantly lower, at 85.0 ± 19.5%, in the PEX group (p = 0.0064). Two cases in the PEX group developed bullous keratopathy. CONCLUSIONS: EXP surgery decreased the corneal endothelial cell populations in PEX patients faster than POAG patients.

Corneal endothelial density loss in patients after gonioscopy­assisted transluminal trabeculotomy.

PURPOSE: To compare short-term changes in corneal endothelial cells after gonioscopy-assisted transluminal trabeculotomy(GATT). METHODS: This retrospective comparative study included 138 patients(138 eyes), and 98 of these patients underwent GATT procedure and 40 underwent SLT procedure as a control group. Changes in the corneal endothelium in patients who underwent GATT and SLT were analyzed retrospectively. Endothelial changes in the central cornea were examined using specular microscopy before and 6 months after the GATT and SLT procedure. Intraocular pressure(IOP), number of glaucoma medications, and side effects were evaluated at visits before and after two methods. RESULTS: One hundred and thirty-eight eyes of 138 patients with a mean age of 62.9±12.7 years in the SLT group and 62.5±11.8 years in the GATT group were included in this study. Pre-procedure mean ± SD IOP was 27.7±3.6 mmHg and 27.4±5.3 mmHg (p=0.173) 2.8±0.5 and 2.9±0.8 (p=0.204) glaucoma drugs are in the SLT and GATT group, respectively. The mean corneal endothelial cell density (CECD) in the SLT group was 2433.1±581.4 cells/mm2 before the procedure and 2435.1±585 cells/mm2 6 months after the procedure, a change of 0.1±0.6% which was not statistically significant (p>0.967).The mean CECD at baseline in the GATT group was 2443.4±508.2 cells/mm2 and decreased to 2290.2±527.7 cells/mm2 6 months after this procedure, representing a cell loss of 6,2±9,1% (p<0.001). CONCLUSION: GATT caused more CECD damage than SLT at the sixth month after the procedure. Considering the loss of CECD in candidates for GATT, sufficient number of endothelial cells in the central cornea is recommended.

[Impact of the ratio between graft and host corneal size on immune rejection, re-bubbling rate and postoperative endothelial cell loss in 457 eyes after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK)]. / Einfluss des Verhältnisses von Transplantatgröße zu Hornhautgröße auf Immunreaktion, Re-Bubbling-Rate und postoperativen Endothelzellverlust bei 457 Augen nach Descemet-Membrane-Endothelial-Keratoplastik (DMEK).

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to assess the impact of the ratio between the graft and host corneal size (RGH) on postoperative complications, such as immune reactions, re-bubbling rate and endothelial cell loss (ECL) after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). PATIENTS AND METHODS: Retrospectively, 457 patient eyes were included which had undergone surgery between 2016 and 2019 in the Department of Ophthalmology, Saarland University Medical Center in Homburg/Saar using DMEK or triple DMEK, diagnosed as Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy (n = 431), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (n = 9) and others (n = 17). The follow-up period extended until the end of 2020. Main outcome measures included immune reaction (IR), re-bubbling rate and the postoperative endothelial cell loss (ECL) at 6 weeks, 6 months and 12 months and whether these measures depended on the RGH. RESULTS: The RGH in this study ranged from 0.35 to 0.62 (0.46 ± 0.04). There were 33 (7.2%) postoperative IRs (DMEK n = 25; triple DMEK n = 8). The average RGH without IR (0.46 ± 0.04) was significantly (p = 0.038) smaller than in the group with IR (0.47 ± 0.05). Re-bubbling was necessary in 159 of 457 (34.8%) patient eyes. The RGH in patient eyes with re-bubbling (0.47 ± 0.04) was significantly (p = 0.014) higher than that in eyes without re-bubbling (0.45 ± 0.04). The mean preoperative endothelial cell count (ECD) was 2603 ± 251 cells/mm2 (min: 2161, max: 3500 cells/mm2). It was shown that a larger RGH had no positive influence on endothelial cell loss (r = 0.001; p = 0.974). CONCLUSION: Our results suggest that a larger graft diameter compared to host corneal size is associated with an increased rate of immune reactions and a higher re-bubbling rate after DMEK. Otherwise, a larger RGH had no positive influence on endothelial cell loss after DMEK. Accordingly, the graft size for DMEK should not be unnecessarily large, especially in eyes with Fuchs' endothelial dystrophy.

Continuous Corneal Endothelial Damage by Chlorhexidine Alcohol Used for Disinfection in Nonophthalmic Surgery.

PURPOSE: To report a case of corneal endothelial damage caused by alcohol-containing chlorhexidine gluconate (CG-A) and its progression over time. METHODS: This was a case report. RESULTS: A 22-year-old man underwent neurosurgery under general anesthesia. CG-A (1%) was used for disinfection after the application of corneal protection tape. Postoperatively, the patient presented with hyperemia and swelling of the left conjunctiva and was referred to our department. Initial examination revealed left corneal epithelial erosion and corneal edema, which improved on postoperative day 14. The corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) was 3,345 cells/mm 2 on day 14, decreased rapidly to 2,090 cells/mm 2 on day 42, and slowly reduced to 1,122 cells/mm 2 on day 168. Thereafter, no decrease in ECD was observed. CONCLUSIONS: CG formulations can lead to a persistent decrease in ECD over several months, even after improvement of acute corneal edema.

Determination of progressive endothelial cell loss after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens implantation.

Comments about endothelial cell loss after posterior chamber phakic intraocular lens are provided, with a particular emphasis on the importance of determining progressive postoperative cell density reduction, excluding that related to surgical trauma.

Narrative review after post-hoc trial analysis of factors that predict corneal endothelial cell loss after phacoemulsification: Tips for improving cataract surgery research.

PURPOSE: Identifying pre/perioperative factors that predict corneal endothelial-cell loss (ECL) after phacoemulsification may reveal ways to reduce ECL. Our literature analysis showed that 37 studies have investigated one or several such factors but all have significant limitations. Therefore, the data of a large randomized controlled trial (PERCEPOLIS) were subjected to post-hoc multivariate analysis determining the ability of nine pre/perioperative variables to predict ECL. METHODS: PERCEPOLIS was conducted in 2015-2016 to compare two phacoemulsification techniques (subluxation and divide-and-conquer) in terms of 3-month ECL. Non-inferiority between the techniques was found. In the present study, post-hoc univariate and multivariate analyses were conducted to determine associations between ECL and age, sex, cataract density, preoperative endothelial-cell density, phacoemulsification technique, effective phaco time (EPT), and 2-hour central-corneal thickness. The data are presented in the context of a narrative review of the literature. RESULTS: Three-month data were available for 275 patients (94% of the randomized cohort; mean age, 74 years; 58% women). Mean LOCSIII cataract grade was 3.2. Mean EPT was 6 seconds. Mean ECL was 13%. Only an older age (beta = 0.2%, p = 0.049) and higher EPT (beta = 1.2%, p = 0.0002) predicted 3-month ECL. Cataract density was significant on univariate (p = 0.04) but not multivariate analysis. The other variables did not associate with ECL. CONCLUSIONS: Older age may amplify ECL due to increased endothelial cell fragility. EPT may promote ECL via cataract density-dependent and -independent mechanisms that should be considered in future phacoemulsification research aiming to reduce ECL. Our literature analysis showed that the average ECL for relatively unselected consecutively-sampled cohorts is 12%.

Plastic vs. glass: the effect of the synthetic material in contact with DMEK tissue during staining on endothelial cell loss.

PURPOSE: Endothelial cell loss (ECL) during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft preparation has been shown to affect graft survival and the need for re-grafting. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively assess the impact of the plastic and glass mediums in contact with DMEK donor tissue during intra-operative graft staining on ECL. METHODS: Retrospective study that included patients who underwent DMEK surgery between January 2019 and June 2021 at Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont and the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal, Canada. DMEK grafts were stained with 0.06% Trypan blue ophthalmic solution (VisionBlue®, Dutch Ophthalmic, USA, Exeter, NH) for 120 s in either a plastic or glass medium prior to delivery into the recipient's eye. The ECL was compared between the two groups 12-30 months post-operatively. RESULTS: ECL at 12-30 months was significantly less in the eyes that had received grafts stained in a plastic medium compared to those stained in a glass medium. Graft survival and re-bubbling was higher in the glass group however this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Staining of the DMEK graft in a plastic medium caused less ECL compared to the glass medium.

Corneal Endothelium Viability Assay Using Trypan Blue Dye After Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish a validated method, consistent with Eye Bank Association of America medical standards, for evaluating endothelial cell loss (ECL) from an entire Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft using trypan blue dye as an alternative to specular microscopy. METHOD: Twenty-nine corneas were prepared for preloaded DMEK by a single technician, and the endothelium was stained with trypan blue dye for 30 seconds. The technician estimated total cell loss as a percentage of the graft and captured an image. Images were evaluated by a blinded technician using ImageJ software to determine ECL and compared with endothelial cell density from specular microscopy. Tissue processing intervals were analyzed for 4 months before and after implementation of this method. RESULTS: For the 29 grafts, there was no statistically significant difference ( t test, P = 0.285) between ECL estimated by a processor (mean = 5.8%) and ECL calculated using an ImageJ software (mean = 5.1%). The processor tended to estimate greater ECL than the actual ECL determined by ImageJ (paired t test, P = 0.022). Comparatively, postprocessing endothelial cell density measured by specular microscopy were higher compared with the preprocessing endothelial cell density (mean = 4.5% P = 0.0006). After implementation of this evaluation method, DMEK graft processing time intervals were reduced by 47.9% compared with specular microscopy evaluation ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that visual ECL estimation using trypan blue staining by a DMEK graft processor is a reliable and efficient method for endothelial assessment. Unlike specular microscopy, this method achieves comprehensive visualization of the entire endothelium, reduces total time out of cold storage, and decreases total time required to prepare and evaluate DMEK grafts.

Donor Corneal Endothelial Cell Maturity and Its Impact on Graft Survival in Glaucoma Patients Undergoing Corneal Transplantation.

PURPOSE: To examine corneal graft survival via corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) and corneal endothelial cell loss (ECL) at 5 years post-transplantation in the eyes of patients with and without a history of undergoing glaucoma surgery according to the maturity of the donor corneal endothelial cells. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 17 patients with glaucoma and 51 patients without glaucoma who underwent Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty or penetrating keratoplasty at the Baptist Eye Institute, Kyoto, Japan, between October 2014 and October 2016. Human corneal endothelial cells were cultured from residual peripheral donor cornea tissue, and the maturity of the cells was evaluated by cell surface markers (ie, CD166+, CD44-/dull, CD24-, and CD105-) using fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Kaplan-Meier analysis or the chi-square test was used to assess the rate of successful corneal graft survival post-transplantation. RESULTS: At 36 months postoperatively, the mean ECD and ECL in the glaucoma-bleb eyes were 1197 ± 352 cells/mm2 and 55.5% ± 13.9% in the high-maturity group and 853 ± 430 cells/mm2 and 67.7% ± 18.1% in the low-maturity group, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that at 5 years postoperatively, the overall rate of survival was 45%, that is, 100% in the high-maturity group and 25% in the low-maturity group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this prospective cohort study revealed that the use of donor corneal grafts containing mature-differentiated corneal endothelial cells could maintain the survival of the transplanted graft for a long-term period, even in patients with a history of undergoing glaucoma surgery.

Corneal endothelial cell loss and intraocular pressure following phacoemulsification using a new viscous-cohesive ophthalmic viscosurgical device.

PURPOSE: To compare results of two ophthalmic viscosurgical devices (OVDs)-Viscoat (a dispersive OVD, Alcon) and FR-Pro (a viscous-cohesive OVD, Rayner), in phacoemulsification surgery. METHODS: A prospective randomized controlled study. Patients undergoing phacoemulsification were randomly assigned to receive one of the two OVDs. Exclusion criteria were age under 40, preoperative endothelial cell count (ECC) below 1,500 cells/mm2 and an eventful surgery. The primary outcome was change in ECC from baseline to postoperative month one and month three. Secondary outcomes were the difference between ECC at postoperative month one and month three, changes in IOP and occurrence of an IOP spike ≥ 30 mmHg after surgery. RESULTS: The study included 84 eyes-43 in the Viscoat group and 41 in the FR-Pro group. Mean cell density loss at month one and month three was 17.0 and 19.2%, respectively, for the Viscoat group and 18.4 and 18.8%, respectively, for the FR-Pro group, with no statistically significant difference between the groups (p = 0.772 and p = 0.671, respectively). The mean ECC difference between the month one and month three visits was 50.5 cells/mm2 and was not statistically significant (p = 0.285). One eye in each group had an IOP spike ≥ 30 mmHg, both normalized by postoperative week one. CONCLUSIONS: Viscoat and FR-Pro have comparable results following phacoemulsification surgery, suggesting that while FR-Pro is not a dispersive OVD, its endothelial cell protection may be comparable to one, perhaps due to the addition of sorbitol. Furthermore, a one-month follow-up of ECC seems sufficient in such trials.

Changes in endothelial cell density after conventional phacoemulsification and FLACS in eyes with dense cataracts.

PURPOSE: To compare the safety, effectiveness, and changes in endothelial cell density (ECD) after standard phacoemulsification and femtosecond laser-assisted cataract surgery (FLACS) in dense cataracts (Lens Opacities Classification System III grade 3.0 NO and above). SETTING: Nethradhama Superspeciality Eye Hospital, Bangalore, India. DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, comparative study. METHOD: 100 eyes of 100 patients were randomly assigned to either conventional phacoemulsification surgery (CPS) or FLACS (LENSAR Laser System) using predefined patterns of nuclear fragmentations. Measured outcomes included intraoperative phacoemulsification time, irrigation fluid volume, surgical time, and complication rates. ECD was evaluated at baseline, 2 weeks, and 6 months postoperatively. RESULTS: The CPS group had significantly higher mean total phacoemulsification time (11.17 ± 6.5 seconds vs 8.03 ± 3.77 seconds), effective phacoemulsification time (6.14 ± 3.62 seconds vs 4.42 ± 2.07 seconds), and total surgical time (8.18 ± 2.36 minutes vs 7.11 ± 1.55 minutes) than the FLACS group ( P < .001). Volume of irrigation fluid was comparable between the 2 groups (CPS, 36.7 ± 12.18 mL; FLACS, 38.64 ± 13.73 mL ( P = .45). Mean corneal edema score and central corneal thickness values on postoperative day 1 were significantly higher for the CPS group. At 6 months, % ECD loss was significantly higher in the CPS group (16.08%) vs the FLACS group (12.8%) ( P < .001). 3 eyes in the CPS group had wound burns of varying severity. CONCLUSIONS: FLACS with customized nuclear fragmentation patterns resulted in significantly less intraoperative phacoemulsification time, surgical time, and endothelial cell loss compared with conventional phacoemulsification when treating dense cataracts. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: CTRI/2021/12/038887.

Using a Cone-Shaped Glass Funnel Adapter Reduces Endothelial Cell Loss Caused by Preloading Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Tissue.

PURPOSE: The aims of this study were (1) to compare "front" and "rear" methods for loading Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) tissue into both micro-Jones and standard-Jones tubes and (2) to evaluate the efficacy of a cone-shaped glass funnel adapter designed to make loading DMEK tissue safer for corneal endothelial cells. METHODS: The corneal endothelium was stained with 0.06% trypan blue to confirm equivalence between mate corneas. The tissues were then processed using the Iowa Lions Eye Bank standard DMEK protocol. In comparison 1, one mate was loaded into the rear of a micro-Jones or standard-Jones tube and the other was loaded into the front of the same tube. In comparison 2, one mate was loaded into the front of the micro-Jones tube and the other was loaded through the cone-shaped funnel adapter into the rear. All tissues were ejected through the front of the modified Jones tubes and assessed for endothelial cell loss (ECL) with calcein AM staining, FIJI, and Trainable Weka Segmentation; scroll widths were measured digitally. RESULTS: There were no statistically significant differences in ECL between front and rear loading [micro (N = 6 pairs): front 15.74% vs. rear 17.95%; standard (N = 6 pairs): front 19.58% vs. rear 19.17%; all P > 0.05]. DMEK scrolls loaded with the funnel adapter exhibited lower ECL compared with scrolls loaded through the front [micro (N = 8 pairs): front 13.53% vs. loading funnel 2.40%; P < 0.001]. Loading with the adapter was not faster (front 6.66 seconds vs. loading funnel 5.52 seconds; P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: Using a cone-shaped DMEK loading funnel may reduce ECL sustained during preloading.

Corneal endothelial cell loss after EX-PRESS surgery depends on site of insertion, cornea or trabecular meshwork.

PURPOSE: Previously, we reported that the Ex-press® shunt (EXP) was associated with more rapid reduction in corneal endothelial cells when inserted into the cornea rather than the trabecular meshwork (TM). We compared the reduction rate of corneal endothelial cells between the corneal insertion group and TM insertion group. METHODS: This was a retrospective study. We included patients who had undergone EXP surgery and were followed for > 5 years. We analyzed the corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) before and after EXP implantation. RESULTS: We included 25 patients in the corneal insertion group and 53 patients in the TM insertion group. One patient in the corneal insertion group developed bullous keratopathy. The ECD decreased significantly more rapidly in the corneal insertion group (p < 0.0001), in whom the mean ECD decreased from 2227 ± 443 to 1415 ± 573 cells/mm2 at 5 years with a mean 5-year survival rate of 64.9 ± 21.9%. By contrast, in the TM insertion group, the mean ECD decreased from 2356 ± 364 to 2124 ± 579 cells/mm2 at 5 years, and the mean 5-year survival rate was 89.3 ± 18.0%. The decrease rate of ECD was calculated as 8.3%/year in the corneal insertion group and 2.2%/year in the TM insertion group. CONCLUSIONS: Insertion into cornea is a risk factor for rapid ECD loss. The EXP should be inserted into the TM to preserve the corneal endothelial cells.

Different patterns in the corneal endothelial cell loss after pars plana and pars limbal insertion of the Baerveldt glaucoma implant.

PURPOSE: To assess corneal endothelial cell (CE) loss after pars plana (PP) and pars limbal (PL) insertion of a Baerveldt glaucoma implant (BGI). DESIGN: Retrospective multicenter interventional comparative study. METHODS: We studied central CE loss for 5 years after BGI surgery in 192 eyes. RESULTS: The prevalence of bullous keratopathy (BK) was greater in the PL cohort than in the PP cohort (P = .003). The CE loss after simultaneous PP vitrectomy and tube insertion into the vitreous cavity was 11.9% in the first year, which was greater than that of 2.9% in eyes where the tube was inserted simply into the vitreous cavity after a prior vitrectomy (P = .046). The annual percentage CE loss after the first year decreased unidirectionally in both of those groups and was 1.3% and 1.0% in the fifth year, respectively (P < .001). For limbal insertion, the CE loss in the simple PL cohort was biphasic, decreasing from 10.5% in the first year to 7.0% in the fifth year. Simultaneous cataract and BGI surgery enhanced the CE loss slightly in the first year in the PP and PL cohorts to 13.0% and 14.0%, respectively. However, these increases were not significant (P = .816 and .358, respectively). Low preoperative CE density (P < .001) and insertion site (P = .020) were significant risk factors for the development of BK. CONCLUSIONS: CE loss in the PL and PP cohorts was biphasic and unidirectional, respectively. The difference in annual CE loss became evident over time. PP tube implantation may be advantageous when the preoperative CE density is low.

Effect of guided Ahmed glaucoma valve implantation on corneal endothelial cells: A 2-year comparative study.

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of guided and non-guided Ahmed glaucoma valve (AGV) implantation on the corneal endothelium. METHODS: Medical records of patients who underwent AGV implantation in the anterior chamber (AC) were reviewed retrospectively. The eyes were divided into two groups depending on the use of a guidance technique with spatula and a 4-0 nylon intraluminal stent. Specular microscopy was performed to measure corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) loss after surgery, and the rate of ECD change was calculated. Tube parameters were measured using anterior segment optical coherence tomography (AS-OCT). RESULTS: The ECD loss during 2 years of follow-up was significantly lower in the guided AGV implantation (gAGV) group than in the non-guided implantation (ngAGV) group, and the rate of ECD change was -0.62 ± 1.23 and -1.42 ± 1.57%/month in the gAGV and ngAGV groups, respectively (p = 0.003). The mean tube-cornea distance (TCD) and mean tube-cornea angle (TCA) were significantly greater in the gAGV group than in the ngAGV group. The frequency of tube repositioning within 2 years after surgery was 0% in the gAGV group and 12.66% in the ngAGV group (p = 0.005). CONCLUSIONS: The use of a guidance technique can reduce corneal endothelial loss during the first 2 years after AGV implantation in the AC. The tube was positioned at a more distant and wider angle from the cornea in the eyes of the gAGV group, which may have contributed to the reduced need for tube repositioning to prevent corneal decompensation.

Comparison of Pre-Descemet Endothelial Keratoplasty and Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty in Endothelial Decompensation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare the outcomes of pre-Descemet endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) in cases of endothelial decompensation. METHODS: This was a prospective, randomized, interventional study conducted at a tertiary eye hospital in North India. Thirty eyes of 28 patients with corneal decompensation were randomly subjected to PDEK (n = 15 eyes) and DMEK (n = 15 eyes). Preoperative demographic details, surgical indications, uncorrected distance visual acuity, corrected distance visual acuity, contrast sensitivity, anterior and posterior segment details, intraocular pressure, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell count, and corneal aberrometry tracing on wavefront analysis were recorded. Patients were followed up for 6 months postsurgery. Visual and graft survival outcomes were assessed. RESULTS: Intraoperatively, a surgeon reported better ease of preparation and intracameral handling with PDEK grafts. Both groups showed comparable improvement in visual acuity, contrast, and high-order aberrations. A decrease in central corneal thickness was significantly higher in DMEK (196 ± 26 vs. 140 ± 14 µm) patients. DMEK grafts were significantly thinner than PDEK grafts at the 6-month follow-up (16 ± 2.17 vs. 27.2 ± 1.93 µm). Endothelial cell loss (35% in DMEK vs. 33.4% in PDEK, P = 0.48) and rise of intraocular pressure (from 15.33 ± 2.85 mm Hg to 15.53 ± 2.2 mm Hg in the DMEK group vs. from 14.6 ± 1.99 mm Hg to 16.2 ± 1.43 mm Hg in the PDEK group) were comparable. Rebubbling rates were higher in the DMEK group (3/15, 20%) compared with the PDEK group (1/15, 6.66%; P = 0.165). CONCLUSIONS: DMEK and PDEK were comparable for both quantitative and qualitative visual outcomes and anatomically for graft survival at the 6-month follow-up.

Effect of Head Trauma-Related Deaths on Corneal Endothelial Cell Loss in Eye Bank Donors.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine the effect of head trauma-related deaths on corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) in eye bank donors. METHODS: This is a retrospective study of 287 corneas from donors with causes of death secondary to motor vehicle accident with sustained head trauma (n = 50), gunshot wound to the head (n = 138), fall with sustained head trauma (n = 2), and non-head-related traumatic causes of death (n = 97). Donors older than age 50 years were excluded due to concern for undiagnosed Fuchs endothelial dystrophy as a potential confounder for the cause of endothelial cell loss. Donor characteristics, ECD, and focal endothelial cell loss on specular microscopy were compared between the groups. Donors in the head trauma and nonhead trauma groups were matched by age; there were 42 age-matched donors in both groups. RESULTS: Age and ECD were negatively correlated (Pearson correlation coefficient = -0.57). Death-to-preservation time was not significantly different between the 2 groups ( P value = 0.59). The mean ECD in the head trauma group was 2859 ± 370 cells/mm 2 and 3041 ± 464 cells/mm 2 in the nonhead trauma group. The head trauma group had a lower ECD (178 ± 70 cells/mm 2 , P value = 0.013). After matching for age, the difference in ECD between the 2 groups was -94 ± 82 cells/mm 2 ( P value = 0.26). The adjusted odds of having focal endothelial cell loss was not statistically significant ( P value = 0.50) between the groups. CONCLUSIONS: After statistical adjustments, there were no differences between the head trauma and nonhead trauma groups.

Influence of Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation Patterns on Postoperative Clinical Outcome.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to quantify preparation difficulties and complications during DMEK graft preparation and their influence on clinical outcome. METHODS: A retrospective evaluation of 214 consecutive DMEK surgeries from the prospective Cologne DMEK database was performed between July 2018 and December 2019. Preparation conditions (such as central and peripheral adherences, tissue fragility, and Descemet membrane splitting) were quantified and divided into 3 groups: easy, difficult, and very difficult preparation. At follow-up (3, 6, and 12 months after DMEK), best spectacle-corrected visual acuity, endothelial cell count (ECC), and rebubbling rates were evaluated and compared between groups. RESULTS: An easy preparation was possible in 41.6% of cases (group 1, n = 89), a difficult preparation of the DMEK graft occurred in 30.8% (group 2, n = 66), and a very difficult preparation occurred in 27.6% (group 3, n = 59). There was no difference between groups for best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 3, 6, and 12 months ( P = 0.179, P = 0.325, and P = 0.682, respectively) or for ECC at 3 and 6 months ( P = 0.537 and P = 0.606, respectively). Only at 12 months, the ECC was slightly significant between groups ( P = 0.045). Regarding the rebubbling rate, there was no difference ( P = 0.585). 17.9% of eyes from group 1, 25.7% of eyes from group 2, and 23.7% of eyes from group 3 received at least 1 rebubbling. CONCLUSIONS: These data suggest that difficult preparation conditions do not lead to any worsening of visual acuity or rebubbling rate in the 1-year outcome after DMEK. The endothelial cell density at 12 months showed slightly poorer results in the cases of very difficult preparation.