RESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Triptorelin is available as 1- and 3-month prolonged-release (PR) formulations; at the time of the study, only the former was approved for central precocious puberty (CPP) in China. This study assessed the efficacy and safety of the triptorelin 3-month PR formulation in Chinese children with CPP. METHODS: In this 12-month, prospective, open-label, multicentre, single-arm study (NCT04736602), Chinese children (mean age [standard deviation (SD)], 7.6 ± 0.8 years) with CPP received triptorelin pamoate 15 mg on day 1 and at months 3, 6 and 9. The primary endpoint was the proportion with luteinizing hormone (LH) suppression (stimulated peak LH ≤ 3 IU/L after gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] stimulation) at month 3. Secondary endpoints included changes from baseline in hormone levels and clinical parameters, as well as safety assessments. RESULTS: Overall, 32 children were enrolled, including three boys. LH suppression to prepubertal levels (≤ 3 IU/L) after GnRH stimulation was observed in 100%, 93.5% and 93.5% of participants at months 3, 6 and 12, respectively. Basal and peak LH and follicle-stimulating hormone levels were substantially suppressed at months 3, 6 and 12, and most participants showed sex hormone suppression. At months 6 and 12 respectively 92.9% and 89.3% of girls had stable breast development, and all boys had stable genital development. There was a decrease in mean growth velocity from baseline (8.96 cm/year) to months 3, 6 and 12 (8.07, 5.24 and 6.94 cm/year, respectively). The mean difference between bone and chronological age decreased from baseline (2.85 years) to month 12 (2.39 years). In girls, uterine length was stable or reduced at month 12; in boys, testicular volume was reduced. Triptorelin was well tolerated. CONCLUSION: The triptorelin 3-month PR formulation demonstrated similar efficacy to that previously reported in non-Chinese patients with CPP and had an acceptable safety profile. This supports triptorelin 3-month PR as a viable option for Chinese children with CPP.
Central precocious puberty (CPP) occurs when the reproductive organs and secondary sexual characteristics develop too early in children (before 8 years old in girls or 9 years old in boys). It can cause significant psychological harm and may lead to health problems later in life. Triptorelin is a type of treatment designed to suppress the hormonal activity responsible for CPP and therefore slow down early pubertal development. Triptorelin can be given as an injection into muscle every month or every 3 months; the 3-monthly formulation is commonly used in many countries but at the time of this study it was not licensed for patients with CPP in China. Our trial assessed the effect of triptorelin treatment every 3 months for 1 year in 32 Chinese children with CPP. For all patients who had measurements available, 3-monthly triptorelin suppressed luteinizing hormonea key hormone involved in CPPto below typical prepubertal levels. Other hormones involved in puberty were also suppressed. Children experienced a slowing down of the development of secondary sexual characteristics (breasts, genitals and pubic hair), and stabilization or reduction in the size of internal sexual organs (uterine length in girls and testicular volume in boys). Their height also increased less rapidly than previously. There were no concerning side effects of triptorelin treatment, and the safety profile matched that seen in other countries where triptorelin is widely used for CPP. Overall, our study findings suggest that the 3-monthly triptorelin formulation may be a good option for Chinese children with CPP.
Asunto(s)
Pubertad Precoz , Pamoato de Triptorelina , Femenino , Masculino , Humanos , Niño , Preescolar , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversos , Pubertad Precoz/tratamiento farmacológico , Pubertad Precoz/inducido químicamente , Estudios Prospectivos , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/uso terapéutico , Hormona Luteinizante/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
There is a need for a safe, effective and practical method of oestrus suppression in the mare. The aim of this study was to monitor ovarian activity in mares exposed to either 9.4 or 28.2 mg deslorelin acetate, a GnRH agonist, in the form of a sustained-release implant. Following oestrus synchronisation, mares were randomly assigned to one of three groups (n = 4 per group) and administered either one (Des1 group; 9.4 mg) or three (Des3 group; 28.2 mg) implants of deslorelin acetate (Suprelorin-12, Virbac Australia) or one blank implant (Control group; Virbac Australia). Mares underwent weekly blood sampling for 12 weeks following implant placement (Day 0-Day 84), with transrectal palpation and ultrasonography of the reproductive tract at all sampling timepoints except Days 56, 70 and 77. All mares showed baseline serum progesterone concentrations (SPC; ≤1.3 nmol/L or 0.4 ng/ml) on Day 0. Cycling Control mares showed typical oestrous cyclicity characterised by peaks and troughs in SPC over time. Four of eight treated mares demonstrated a sustained elevation in SPC after the initial ovulation after implant placement; SPC declined to baseline levels (Des1 group; 2 mares) or remained elevated (Des3 group; 2 mares) at the final sampling timepoint on Day 84. Oestrous cyclicity was erratic in three of the remaining four treated mares. In total, 87.5% (7 of 8) of treated mares showed atypical oestrous cyclicity after implant placement. These results suggest that deslorelin acetate disrupts oestrous cyclicity in the mare, which warrants further research.
Asunto(s)
Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina , Pamoato de Triptorelina , Femenino , Caballos , Animales , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversos , Ovulación , PeriodicidadRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION AND OBJECTIVES: GnRH agonists and GnRH antagonists are two of the mainstays of hormonal therapy (HT) for prostate cancer (PCa). These drugs are at increased risk of cardiovascular (CV) adverse events (AEs). Aim of our study was to compare real-life data on AEs associated with GnRH agonists and GnRH antagonists based on Eudra-Vigilance (EV) and Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported AEs. MATERIALS AND METHODS: EV and FDA databases were queried and the number of CV adverse events (AEs) for degarelix, buserelin, goserelin, leuprorelin, triptorelin until September 2021 were recorded. Specific CV AEs were recorded and data were analyzed per age and severity. pooled relative risk (PRR) was used to compare data between drugs. RESULTS: CV events were reported in 315/5128 (6%) for Degarelix, in 55/628 for Buserelin (9%), in 843/12,145 (7%) for Goserelin, in 3395/71,160 (5%) for Leuprorelin and in 214/4969 (5%) for Triptorelin. In terms of specific CV disorders, Degarelix presented lower risk of hypertension (PRR 0.60 (95% CI 0.37-0.98), p = 0.04), of myocardial infarction (PRR 0.05 (95% CI 0.01-0.39), p < 0.01) and thrombosis (PRR 0.14 (0.02-1.07), p = 0.06) when compared to GnRH agonists. Overall, younger patients (<65 years) presented a very low risk of CV AEs. Side effects were classified as serious in 90-96% of the cases. Fatal AEs were 5-20% over the CV AEs and 0.2-1% over the total AEs. CONCLUSIONS: Real-life data are consistent with registry studies regarding side effects related to HT. Real-life data suggest GnRH agonists are associated with higher CV AEs when compared to GnRH antagonists. Clinicians should consider these data when prescribing HT especially in patients with CV comorbidities.
Asunto(s)
Leuprolida , Neoplasias de la Próstata , Estados Unidos/epidemiología , Masculino , Humanos , Leuprolida/efectos adversos , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de la Próstata/inducido químicamente , Goserelina/uso terapéutico , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversos , Buserelina/uso terapéutico , United States Food and Drug Administration , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
ABSTRACT: Triptorelin is one of the most commonly used gonadotropin-releasing hormone agonists and has been used in the treatment of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE). This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and safety of up to 24âweeks of triptorelin treatment after conservative surgery for DIE.This prospective, non-interventional study was performed in 18 tertiary hospitals in China. Premenopausal women aged ≥18âyears treated with triptorelin 3.75âmg once every 28âdays for up to 24âweeks after conservative surgery for DIE were included. Endometriosis symptoms were assessed, using a visual analogue scale (0-10âcm) or numerical range (0-10), at baseline (pre-surgery) and routine visits 3, 6, 9, 12, 18, and 24âmonths after surgery. Changes in symptom intensity over time were primary outcome measures.A total of 384 women (mean [standard deviation] age, 33.4 [6.2] years) were analyzed. Scores for all symptoms (pelvic pain, dysmenorrhea, ovulation pain, dyspareunia, menorrhagia, metrorrhagia, and gastrointestinal and urinary symptoms) assessed decreased from baseline over 24âmonths. Cumulative improvement rates in pelvic pain, dysmenorrhoa, ovulation pain, and dyspareunia were 74.4%, 83.6%, 55.1%, and 66.9%, respectively. The 24-month cumulative recurrence rate (≥1 symptom) was 22.2%. The risk of symptom recurrence was higher in patients with ≥2 versus 1 lesion (odds ratio [OR] 2.539; 95% CI: 1.458-4.423; Pâ=â.001) and patients with moderate (OR 5.733; 95% CI: 1.623-20.248; Pâ=â.007) or severe (OR 8.259; 95% CI: 2.449-27.851; Pâ=â.001) pain versus none/mild pain. Triptorelin was well tolerated without serious adverse events.Triptorelin after conservative surgery for DIE improved symptoms over 24âmonths of follow up. The recurrence rate of symptoms was low and triptorelin was generally well tolerated.Trial registration number: ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT01942369.
Asunto(s)
Endometriosis , Pamoato de Triptorelina/uso terapéutico , Adulto , China , Dispareunia/tratamiento farmacológico , Dispareunia/etiología , Endometriosis/tratamiento farmacológico , Endometriosis/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Dolor Pélvico/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Pélvico/etiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Triptorelin depot is largely used to treat central precocious puberty (CPP) in children, and a 3-month depot has been introduced. However, data about the 3-month gonadotropin-releasing hormone use for treatment of CPP in Korean girls are not available. This study was conducted to compare the efficacy of a triptorelin 11.25 mg 3-month depot with that of a 3.75 mg 1-month depot in suppressing pubertal development for the treatment of CPP. METHODS: A retrospective study, including 106 girls with CPP treated with triptorelin, was conducted. Fifty patients were treated with a triptorelin 3-month depot, and 56 were treated with a triptorelin 1-month depot. Serum luteinizing hormone (LH), follicle-stimulating hormone, and estradiol levels were analysed every 6 months after the visit. The height and bone age of each patient was evaluated at the beginning of treatment, after 6 months, and one year after therapy. RESULTS: The baseline characteristics of the girls treated with a 3-month depot were similar to those of the girls treated with a 1-month depot. A suppressed levels of LH to the triptorelin injection (serum LH < 2.5 IU/L) at 6 months was seen in 90.0% and 98.2% of the girls treated with the 3-month and 1-month depots, respectively (P = 0.160). After 1 year of treatment, a suppressed levels of LH was seen in 93.5% and 100% of the girls treated with the 3-month and 1-month depots, respectively (P = 0.226). Height velocity showed no significant difference between the two groups. Degree of bone age advancement decreased from 1.22 ± 0.07 and 1.22 ± 0.08 years at baseline (P = 0.914) to 1.16 ± 0.07 and 1.17 ± 0.08 in the girls treated with the 3-month and 1-month depots after 1 year, respectively (P = 0.481). CONCLUSION: This study showed that the efficacy of long-acting triptorelin 3-month was comparable to 1-month depot regarding hormonal suppression and inhibition of bone maturation. The triptorelin 11.25 mg 3-month depot is an effective treatment for girls with CPP.
Asunto(s)
Preparaciones de Acción Retardada/administración & dosificación , Luteolíticos/uso terapéutico , Pubertad Precoz/tratamiento farmacológico , Pamoato de Triptorelina/uso terapéutico , Niño , Estradiol/sangre , Femenino , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/sangre , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/sangre , Humanos , Hormona Luteinizante/sangre , Luteolíticos/administración & dosificación , Luteolíticos/efectos adversos , Pubertad Precoz/sangre , Pubertad Precoz/epidemiología , República de Corea/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pamoato de Triptorelina/administración & dosificación , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
A male dog with benign prostatic hyperplasia and several small intraprostatic cysts was treated with a GnRH-agonist implant containing 4,7â mg deslorelin (Suprelorin®). Within 2â weeks after the implantation, the prior urethral bleeding worsened. A large intraprostatic cyst was detected sonographically. The patient was subsequently treated with osaterone acetate (0.4 mg/kg p.â o. once a day for 7â days) and enrofloxacin (5â mg/kg p.â o. once a day for 21â days). The clinical symptoms receded within 10â days. Within one month, the cyst regressed completely. The mechanisms of cyst enlargement are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Quistes , Enfermedades de los Perros , Implantes de Medicamentos/efectos adversos , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Hiperplasia Prostática , Animales , Quistes/inducido químicamente , Quistes/tratamiento farmacológico , Quistes/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Perros/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades de los Perros/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de los Perros/patología , Perros , Implantes de Medicamentos/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Próstata/patología , Enfermedades de la Próstata/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades de la Próstata/patología , Enfermedades de la Próstata/veterinaria , Hiperplasia Prostática/complicaciones , Hiperplasia Prostática/tratamiento farmacológico , Hiperplasia Prostática/veterinaria , Pamoato de Triptorelina/administración & dosificación , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversos , Pamoato de Triptorelina/análogos & derivados , Pamoato de Triptorelina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Perivascular epithelioid cell tumors (PEComa) are rare mesenchymal neoplasms. mTOR inhibitors are the most active agents in PEComa and in patients progressing to mTOR inhibitors, other available therapies have limited benefit. Preclinical evidences showed a cross-talk between the mTOR pathway and estrogen receptor signaling. This provided a rationale for adding an antiestrogen treatment in female patients becoming resistant to mTOR inhibitors. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Since April 2018, female patients with advanced/metastatic PEComa progressing to mTOR inhibitors were treated with a combination of sirolimus and exemestane with or without LHRH analogue (based on menopausal status). This case series was retrospectively reviewed. Survival analyses were performed using the Kaplan-Meier method. RESULTS: A total of seven consecutive patients treated with the combination of sirolimus and antiestrogen treatment were retrospectively reviewed. Six (86%) received a combination of sirolimus and exemestane, whereas one patient (14%) received a combination of sirolimus, exemestane, and triptorelin since in premenopausal status. After a median follow-up of 13.1 months, three patients (43%) experienced a partial response, three patients (43%) experienced a stabilization of disease, and one patient (14%) had disease progression with an overall response rate of 43% and a disease control rate of 86%. CONCLUSIONS: In this small retrospective case series, the addition of antiestrogen treatment in female patients with advanced PEComa progressing to mTOR inhibitors resulted in a remarkable clinical benefit in a setting where no other options are available.
Asunto(s)
Everolimus/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de Células Epitelioides Perivasculares/tratamiento farmacológico , Sarcoma/tratamiento farmacológico , Sirolimus/administración & dosificación , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/genética , Anciano , Antagonistas de Estrógenos/administración & dosificación , Antagonistas de Estrógenos/efectos adversos , Everolimus/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias de Células Epitelioides Perivasculares/genética , Neoplasias de Células Epitelioides Perivasculares/patología , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Sarcoma/genética , Sarcoma/patología , Transducción de Señal/efectos de los fármacos , Sirolimus/efectos adversos , Serina-Treonina Quinasas TOR/antagonistas & inhibidores , Pamoato de Triptorelina/administración & dosificación , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Besides local reactions, systemic hypersensitivity reactions such as urticaria, anaphylaxis, serum sickness and Henoch-Schönlein purpura (HSP) have been reported during gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analogue treatment. AIM: To present the clinical presentation of 9 cases with systemic hypersensitivity reactions to GnRH analogues and discuss the management of such reactions based on our experience. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Nine of 232 (3.8%) patients with central precocious puberty receiving GnRH analogue treatment had systemic hypersensitivity reactions in 4 years' period. Six patients had a type 1 hypersensitivity reaction (generalized hives, pruritus, and/or edema) to triptorelin acetate (TA), 2 patients to leuprolide acetate (LA), and 1 patient to both medications who also developed anaphylaxis to LA during intradermal test (IDT). Another patient on TA had skin lesions suggestive of HSP. GnRH analogue treatment was discontinued in 2 patients after discussion with the parents. Treatment was changed to another GnRH analogue preparation in 6 patients and was maintained with the same medication with antihistamines and corticosteroid premedication in 1 patient. None of the patients developed new reactions after these precautions. CONCLUSION: Systemic hypersensitivity reactions should be carefully evaluated and cross-reaction to the other GnRH analogues should be kept in mind. Discontinuation of GnRH analogue is always an option. However, if continuation of GnRH analogue is elected, we recommend switching to an alternative GnRH analogue, which should be considered only after a skin prick test (SPT) and IDT. In the lack of the possibility to perform SPT and IDT, injections may be administered under strict medical supervision in a well-equipped facility to manage anaphylaxis. We discuss additional options in situations where alternative GnRH analogues are unavailable, which enabled us to continue treatment in most cases without further problems.
Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/tratamiento farmacológico , Hipersensibilidad a las Drogas/etiología , Fármacos para la Fertilidad Femenina/efectos adversos , Antagonistas de los Receptores Histamínicos/uso terapéutico , Leuprolida/efectos adversos , Pubertad Precoz/tratamiento farmacológico , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversos , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Gonadotropin-releasing hormone analogues (GnRHa) administered as depot formulations are the standard of care for children with central precocious puberty (CPP). Puberty resumes after treatment discontinuation, but little is known concerning fertility in women who have been treated with GnRHa for CPP during childhood. METHODS: The PREFER (PREcocious puberty, FERtility) study prospectively analysed fertility, via a series of questionnaires, in women treated during childhood with triptorelin (depot formulation) for CPP. Co-primary endpoints were the proportion of women wanting a pregnancy any time before study inclusion and during the follow-up period but not pregnant 6 and 12 months after stopping contraception and the waiting time to pregnancy (WTP). RESULTS: A total of 574 women were identified, and 194 women were included in the analysis. Although there were not enough data for primary endpoint assessment, few women (1.7%) reported issues with fertility or were unable to become pregnant despite trying to conceive. Most pregnancies (84.4%, 95% CI [67.2-94.7%]) occurred within 1 year of trying to conceive, in line with the WTP for women without previous CPP. CONCLUSION: The results, based on a limited sample of patients, suggest that CPP treated with triptorelin does not negatively impact women's fertility in adulthood. These results need to be consolidated with a subsequent study performed when these women will have reached their mid-thirties.
Asunto(s)
Fertilidad/efectos de los fármacos , Luteolíticos/efectos adversos , Pubertad Precoz/tratamiento farmacológico , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversos , Adolescente , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Estudios Longitudinales , Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
In vitro fertilization is commonly used for treating infertility. One stage of this process is controlled hyperstimulation of the ovaries, achieved by administering gonadotropins. There are several stimulation protocols utilized that increase the number of ovarian follicles during IVF. The most common protocol employs desensitization - the inhibition of follicle-stimulating hormone and luteinizing hormone secretion by the pituitary gland. This is achieved by administering a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) analog that is agonistic for the GnRH receptor. However the use of a this drug during therapy carries a risk of complications. This case report deals with a rare case of a woman who underwent pituitary tumor growth as a result of the treatment of GnRH analog.
Asunto(s)
Adenoma/inducido químicamente , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Apoplejia Hipofisaria/inducido químicamente , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/inducido químicamente , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversos , Adenoma/diagnóstico , Adenoma/cirugía , Adulto , Tratamiento de Urgencia , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro/efectos adversos , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/análogos & derivados , Humanos , Procedimientos Neuroquirúrgicos , Apoplejia Hipofisaria/diagnóstico , Apoplejia Hipofisaria/cirugía , Hipófisis/diagnóstico por imagen , Hipófisis/efectos de los fármacos , Hipófisis/patología , Hipófisis/cirugía , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/diagnóstico , Neoplasias Hipofisarias/cirugía , Pamoato de Triptorelina/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
RESEARCH QUESTION: Is body-mass index (BMI) associated with oocyte maturation in women at high risk for developing severe ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) who are triggered with gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist? DESIGN: Prospective observational cohort study. A total of 113 patients at high risk for severe OHSS (presence of at least 19 follicles ≥11 mm) pre-treated with gonadotrophin releasing hormone (GnRH) antagonists and recombinant FSH were administered 0.2 mg triptorelin to trigger final oocyte maturation. Patients were classified in two groups depending on their BMI: ΒΜΙ less than 25 kg/m2 (nâ¯=â¯72) and ΒΜΙ 25 kg/m2 or over (nâ¯=â¯41). Baseline, ovarian stimulation and embryological characteristics, as well as luteal-phase hormone profiles, were compared in patients classified into the two BMI groups. The main outcome measure was the number of mature oocytes. RESULTS: A significantly higher number of mature (metaphase II) oocytes (19 [18-21] versus 16 [13-20], Pâ¯=â¯0.029) was present in women with BMI less than 25 kg/m2 compared with those with BMI 25 kg/m2 or greater. The number of retrieved oocytes, the number of fertilized oocytes, oocyte retrieval, maturation and fertilization rates were similar in the two groups. A significantly higher dose of recombinant FSH was required for patients with BMI 25 kg/m2 or greater compared with patients with BMI less than 25 kg/m2 (1875 [1650-2150] IU versus 1650 [1600-1750] IU, Pâ¯=â¯0.003) and the two groups displayed different luteal phase hormonal profiles. CONCLUSIONS: Among women at high risk for developing severe OHSS who are triggered with a standard dose (0.2 mg) of the GnRH agonist triptorelin, women with BMI 25 kg/m2 or greater had significantly fewer mature oocytes, required a higher total dose of recombinant FSH compared with women with BMI less than 25 kg/m2.
Asunto(s)
Índice de Masa Corporal , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/administración & dosificación , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Oocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica/inducido químicamente , Inducción de la Ovulación/efectos adversos , Pamoato de Triptorelina/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/efectos adversos , Humanos , Oocitos/crecimiento & desarrollo , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Estudios Prospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
STUDY QUESTION: Are oocyte maturation rates different among 0.1, 0.2 and 0.4 mg triptorelin used for triggering final oocyte maturation in patients at high risk for ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS) undergoing ICSI? SUMMARY ANSWER: A dose of 0.1 mg triptorelin results in similar oocyte maturation rates compared to higher doses of 0.2 and 0.4 mg in patients at high risk for OHSS undergoing ICSI. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY: The GnRH agonist triptorelin is widely used instead of hCG for triggering final oocyte maturation, in order to eliminate the risk of severe OHSS in patients undergoing ovarian stimulation for IVF/ICSI. However, limited data are currently available regarding its optimal dose use for this purpose in patients at high risk for OHSS. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION: A retrospective study was performed between November 2015 and July 2017 in 131 infertile patients at high risk for severe OHSS undergoing ovarian stimulation for ICSI. High risk for severe OHSS was defined as the presence of at least 19 follicles ≥11 mm in diameter on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS: Ovarian stimulation was performed with recombinant FSH and GnRH antagonists. Patients received 0.1 (n = 42), 0.2 (n = 46) or 0.4 mg (n = 43) triptorelin for triggering final oocyte maturation. Hormonal evaluation of FSH, LH, estradiol (E2) and progesterone (PRG) was carried out on the day of triggering final oocyte maturation, 8 and 36 hours post triggering and 3, 5, 7, and 10 days after triptorelin administration. During this period, all patients were assessed for symptoms and signs indicative of severe OHSS development. Primary outcome measure was oocyte maturation rate, defined as the number of metaphase II (MII) oocytes divided by the number of cumulus-oocyte-complexes retrieved per patient. Results are expressed as median (interquartile range). MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE: No significant differences in patient baseline characteristics were observed among the 0.1 mg, the 0.2 mg and the 0.4 mg groups. Regarding the primary outcome measure, no differences were observed in oocyte maturation rate among the three groups compared [82.6% (17.8%) versus 83.3% (18.8%) versus 85.1% (17.2%), respectively, P = 0.686].In addition, no significant differences were present among the 0.1 mg, 0.2 mg and 0.4 mg groups, regarding the number of mature (MII) oocytes [21 (13) versus 20 (6) versus 20 (11), respectively; P = 0.582], the number of oocytes retrieved [25.5 (13) versus 24.5 (11) versus 23 (12), respectively; P = 0.452], oocyte retrieval rate [81.0% (17.7%) versus 76.5% (23.5%) versus 75.0% (22.5), respectively; P = 0.088], the number of fertilized (two pronuclei) oocytes [12.5 (9) versus 14.5 (7) versus 14.0 (8), respectively; P = 0.985], fertilization rate [71.7% (22%) versus 77.1% (19.1%) versus 76.6% (23.3%), respectively; P = 0.525] and duration of luteal phase [7 (1) versus 8 (2) versus 7 (1) days, respectively; P = 0.632]. Moreover, no significant differences were present among the three triptorelin groups regarding serum levels of LH, FSH, E2 and PRG at any of the time points assessed following triggering of final oocyte maturation. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION: This is a retrospective study, and although there were no differences in the baseline characteristics of the three groups compared, the presence of bias cannot be excluded. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS: Based on the results of the current study, it appears that triggering final oocyte maturation with a lower (0.1 mg) or a higher dose (0.4 mg) of triptorelin, as compared to the most commonly used dose of 0.2 mg, does not confer any benefit in terms of oocyte maturation rate in patients at high risk for severe OHSS. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S): No external funding was obtained for this study. There are no conflicts of interest.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Maduración In Vitro de los Oocitos/métodos , Oocitos/efectos de los fármacos , Síndrome de Hiperestimulación Ovárica/etiología , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversos , Pamoato de Triptorelina/farmacología , Adulto , Estradiol/sangre , Femenino , Fertilización In Vitro/métodos , Hormona Folículo Estimulante/sangre , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Hormona Luteinizante/sangre , Oocitos/crecimiento & desarrollo , Oogénesis/efectos de los fármacos , Inducción de la Ovulación/métodos , Embarazo , Índice de Embarazo , Progesterona/sangre , Estudios Retrospectivos , Riesgo , Pamoato de Triptorelina/administración & dosificación , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
AIM: The aim of the study is to analyse whether letrozole (L) and zoledronic acid plus L (ZL) are more effective than tamoxifen (T) as adjuvant endocrine treatment of premenopausal patients with breast cancer with hormone receptor-positive (HR+) tumours. PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a phase 3 trial, 1065 premenopausal patients with HR + early breast cancer received triptorelin to suppress ovarian function and were randomly assigned (1:1:1) to adjuvant T, L or ZL for 5 years. Cancer recurrence, second breast or non-breast cancer and death were considered events for the intention-to-treat disease-free survival (DFS) analysis. RESULTS: With a 64-month median follow-up and 134 reported events, the disease-free rate at 5 years was 85.4%, 93.2% and 93.3% with T, L and ZL, respectively (overall P = 0.008). The hazard ratio for a DFS event was 0.52 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.34 to 0.80; P = 0.003) with ZL vs T, 0.72 (95% CI, 0.48 to 1.07; P = 0.06) with L vs T and 0.70 (95% CI, 0.44 to 1.12; P = 0.22) with ZL vs L. With 36 deaths, there was no significant difference in overall survival (P = 0.14). Treatment was stopped for toxicity or refusal in 7.3%, 7.3% and 16.6% patients, and in the safety population, grade 3-4 side-effects were reported in 4.2%, 6.9% and 9.1% patients treated with T, L or ZL, respectively. CONCLUSION: HOBOE study shows that in premenopausal patients with early breast cancer undergoing ovarian function suppression with triptorelin, ZL significantly improves DFS, while worsening compliance and toxicity, as compared with T. (NCT00412022).
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/uso terapéutico , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Antagonistas de Estrógenos/uso terapéutico , Letrozol/uso terapéutico , Ovario/efectos de los fármacos , Premenopausia , Tamoxifeno/uso terapéutico , Pamoato de Triptorelina/uso terapéutico , Ácido Zoledrónico/uso terapéutico , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Inhibidores de la Aromatasa/efectos adversos , Conservadores de la Densidad Ósea/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/mortalidad , Neoplasias de la Mama/fisiopatología , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Antagonistas de Estrógenos/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Italia , Letrozol/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ovario/fisiopatología , Tamoxifeno/efectos adversos , Factores de Tiempo , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversos , Ácido Zoledrónico/efectos adversosRESUMEN
IMPORTANCE: Androgen-deprivation therapy (ADT) plus docetaxel is the standard of care in hormone-naive metastatic prostate cancer but is of uncertain benefit in a nonmetastatic, high-risk prostate cancer setting. OBJECTIVE: To assess the benefit of ADT plus docetaxel in patients presenting with rising prostate-specific antigen (PSA) levels after primary local therapy and high-risk factors but no evidence of metastatic disease. DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This open-label, phase 3, randomized superiority trial comparing ADT plus docetaxel vs ADT alone enrolled patients from 28 centers in France between June 4, 2003, and September 25, 2007; final follow-up was conducted April 12, 2017, and analysis was performed May 2 to July 31, 2017. Patients had undergone primary local therapy for prostate cancer, were experiencing rising PSA levels, and were considered to be at high risk of metastatic disease. Stratification was by prior local therapy and PSA-level doubling time (≤6 vs >6 months), and intention-to-treat analysis was used. INTERVENTIONS: Patients were randomly assigned to receive ADT (1 year) plus docetaxel, 70 mg/m2 (every 3 weeks [6 cycles]), or ADT alone (1 year). MAIN OUTCOMES AND MEASURES: The primary outcome was PSA progression-free survival (PSA-PFS). Secondary end points were PSA response, radiologic PFS, overall survival, safety, and quality of life. RESULTS: Overall, 254 patients were randomized (1:1) to the trial; median age, 64 years in the ADT plus docetaxel arm, 66 years in the ADT alone arm. At a median follow-up of 30.0 months, the median PSA-PFS was 20.3 (95% CI, 19.0-21.6) months in the ADT plus docetaxel arm vs 19.3 (95% CI, 18.2-20.8) months in the ADT alone arm (hazard ratio [HR], 0.85; 95% CI, 0.62-1.16; P = .31). At a median follow-up of 10.5 years, there was no significant between-arm difference in radiologic PFS (HR, 1.03; 95% CI, 0.74-1.43; P = .88). Overall survival data were not mature. The most common grade 3 or 4 hematologic toxic effects in the ADT plus docetaxel arm were neutropenia (60 of 125 patients [48.0%]), febrile neutropenia (10 [8.0%]), and thrombocytopenia (4 [3.0%]). There was no significant between-arm difference in overall quality of life. CONCLUSIONS AND RELEVANCE: Compared with ADT alone, combined ADT plus docetaxel therapy with curative intent did not significantly improve PSA-PFS in patients with high-risk prostate cancer and rising PSA levels and no evidence of metastatic disease. TRIAL REGISTRATION: French Health Products Safety Agency identifier: 030591; ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00764166.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/administración & dosificación , Anilidas/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Nitrilos/administración & dosificación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/tratamiento farmacológico , Compuestos de Tosilo/administración & dosificación , Pamoato de Triptorelina/administración & dosificación , Anciano , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/efectos adversos , Anilidas/efectos adversos , Antineoplásicos/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Docetaxel/efectos adversos , Humanos , Estimación de Kaplan-Meier , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nitrilos/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Progresión , Antígeno Prostático Específico/sangre , Neoplasias de la Próstata/sangre , Calidad de Vida , Riesgo , Compuestos de Tosilo/efectos adversos , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
Multiple idiopathic cervical root resorption is an aggressive form of external root resorption that occurs at the cementoenamel junction and can affect multiple teeth (a minimum of 3) throughout the entire dentition. Most of the individuals affected are healthy with noncontributory medical histories. The resorption is usually detected as an incidental finding on radiographs or during dental examination. This case report describes an adult female with multiple cervical root resorptions who had been treated with chemotherapy for ovarian cancer at 16 years old. Nine years later, a total of 12 teeth were diagnosed with cervical root resorption. All of the known causative factors for external cervical resorption were discarded. To our knowledge, this is the first case reported of multiple cervical root resorption related to chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Resorción Radicular/inducido químicamente , Adulto , Bleomicina/administración & dosificación , Bleomicina/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Acetato de Ciproterona/administración & dosificación , Acetato de Ciproterona/efectos adversos , Implantación Dental , Restauración Dental Permanente , Etopósido/administración & dosificación , Etopósido/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Ováricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Resorción Radicular/diagnóstico por imagen , Resorción Radicular/cirugía , Pamoato de Triptorelina/administración & dosificación , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To compare the metabolic changes between men with advanced prostate cancer commenced on a gonadotropin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonist and those treated with orchiectomy. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Fifty-eight hormone-naive men with advanced prostate cancer were randomly assigned (1:1) to either subcapsular orchiectomy or triptorelin 22.5 mg/24 week depot injections. The participants were followed for 48 weeks, with study visits at baseline, 12, 24 and 48 weeks. The primary endpoint was changes in fasting plasma glucose. Secondary endpoints included changes in body composition (i.e. weight, fat mass, visceral adipose tissue [VAT], subcutaneous adipose tissue [SAT], lean body mass [LBM] and android/gynoid fat [AG] ratio) assessed with dual X-ray absorptiometry, serum lipid profiles, and insulin resistance evaluated during an oral glucose tolerance test. Linear mixed models were used to analyse the between-group differences. RESULTS: No treatment differences in the changes in fasting plasma glucose (0.2 mmol/L, 95% confidence interval [CI] -0.1, 0.4; P = 0.32) were observed. The orchiectomy group experienced greater increases in total fat mass (+2.06 kg, 95% CI 0.55, 3.56), SAT (+133 cm3 , 95% CI 22, 243) and weight (+3.30 kg, 95% CI 0.74, 5.87) at 48 weeks than did the triptorelin group (all P < 0.05), with the increases in fat mass being moderately correlated with increases in insulin resistance (P < 0.001). No differences in changed VAT, LBM or AG ratio were observed between the groups. The pooled analyses, combining data from both groups, showed androgen deprivation therapy (ADT) to significantly increase fat mass, SAT, VAT, serum cholesterols (total, high-density lipoprotein and low-density lipoprotein) and all measures of insulin resistance over time, while LBM decreased as compared with baseline values (all P < 0.05). These changes were apparent after only 12-24 weeks of ADT. CONCLUSIONS: Androgen deprivation therapy leads to adverse changes in body composition and increased insulin resistance and serum cholesterols, with changes already observed after only 12-24 weeks of treatment. This study further demonstrates that orchiectomy causes greater increases in fat accumulation compared with GnRH agonists and that these increases are associated with an increase in insulin resistance.
Asunto(s)
Antagonistas de Andrógenos/uso terapéutico , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/uso terapéutico , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Orquiectomía , Neoplasias de la Próstata/metabolismo , Neoplasias de la Próstata/terapia , Pamoato de Triptorelina/uso terapéutico , Absorciometría de Fotón , Adiposidad/efectos de los fármacos , Anciano , Antagonistas de Andrógenos/efectos adversos , Humanos , Resistencia a la Insulina , Masculino , Orquiectomía/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Próstata/fisiopatología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: To evaluate endocrine activity in terms of ovarian function suppression (OFS) of degarelix (a gonadotropin-releasing hormone [GnRH] antagonist) versus triptorelin (a GnRH agonist) in premenopausal patients receiving letrozole as neoadjuvant endocrine therapy for breast cancer. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Premenopausal women with stage cT2 to 4b, any N, M0; estrogen receptor and progesterone receptor greater than 50%; human epidermal growth factor receptor 2-negative breast cancer were randomly assigned to triptorelin 3.75 mg administered intramuscularly on day 1 of every cycle or degarelix 240 mg administered subcutaneously (SC) on day 1 of cycle 1 then 80 mg SC on day 1 of cycles 2 through 6, both with letrozole 2.5 mg/day for six 28-day cycles. Surgery was performed 2 to 3 weeks after the last injection. Serum was collected at baseline, after 24 and 72 hours, at 7 and 14 days, and then before injections on cycles 2 through 6. The primary end point was time to optimal OFS (time from the first injection to first assessment of centrally assessed estradiol level ≤ 2.72 pg/mL [≤ 10 pmol/L] during neoadjuvant therapy). The trial had 90% power to detect a difference using a log-rank test with a two-sided α of .05. Secondary end points included response, tolerability, and patient-reported endocrine symptoms. RESULTS: Between February 2014 and January 2017, 51 patients were enrolled (n = 26 received triptorelin plus letrozole; n = 25 received degarelix plus letrozole). Time to optimal OFS was three times faster for patients assigned to degarelix and letrozole than to triptorelin and letrozole (median, 3 v 14 days; hazard ratio, 3.05; 95% CI, 1.65 to 5.65; P < .001). Furthermore, OFS was maintained during subsequent cycles for all patients assigned to receive degarelix and letrozole, whereas 15.4% of patients assigned to receive triptorelin and letrozole had suboptimal OFS after cycle 1 (six events during 127 measurements). Adverse events as a result of both degarelix plus letrozole and triptorelin plus letrozole were as expected. CONCLUSION: In premenopausal women receiving letrozole for neoadjuvant endocrine therapy, OFS was achieved more quickly and maintained more effectively with degarelix than with triptorelin.
Asunto(s)
Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias de la Mama/tratamiento farmacológico , Adulto , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos Hormonales/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Neoplasias de la Mama/sangre , Neoplasias de la Mama/patología , Neoplasias de la Mama/cirugía , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Estradiol/sangre , Femenino , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/antagonistas & inhibidores , Humanos , Letrozol/administración & dosificación , Letrozol/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias Hormono-Dependientes/sangre , Neoplasias Hormono-Dependientes/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Hormono-Dependientes/patología , Neoplasias Hormono-Dependientes/cirugía , Oligopéptidos/administración & dosificación , Oligopéptidos/efectos adversos , Ovario/efectos de los fármacos , Ovario/fisiopatología , Premenopausia , Receptores de Estrógenos/metabolismo , Receptores de Progesterona/metabolismo , Pamoato de Triptorelina/administración & dosificación , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
The objective of this study was to assess the efficiency and clinical safety of postnatal administration of a GnRH agonist on canine puberty postponement. Sexual steroids and histological gonadal changes were also described. Twenty-four littermate puppies were randomly assigned to: Deslorelin acetate 18.8â¯mg sc (DESLO; nâ¯=â¯12) or Placebo: sc (PLACE; nâ¯=â¯12) postnatally. The dogs were clinically and endocrinologically followed up until puberty when they were gonadectomized and their gonads histomorphometrically studied. Deslorelin postponed the age of puberty (72.7⯱â¯4.8 vs. 35.8⯱â¯1.9 weeks; Pâ¯<â¯0.01) in these dogs. At the time of this submission, 3 DESLO dogs (108 weeks old) remain non-pubertal. All dogs concluded growing at a similar age (29.75⯱â¯2.44 vs. 29.25⯱â¯0.90 weeks; Pâ¯>â¯0.1) independently of their group and pubertal status. None of the females had side effects while the 2 non pubertal DESLO males presented bilateral cryptorchydism. All the bitches ovulated at puberty (Pâ¯>â¯0.1) and the 2 DESLO that were mated became pregnant. Deslorelin postponed basal serum sexual steroids up to puberty in both genders (Pâ¯<â¯0.01). The histomorphometrical study of the testes revealed that the tubular diameter (Pâ¯<â¯0.05), germinal epithelium height and composition (Pâ¯<â¯0.01) were decreased in DESLO group. Ovarian structures did not differ between treatments (Pâ¯>â¯0.05). It was concluded that postnatal deslorelin decreased sexual steroids reversibly postponing puberty in both genders without side effects in bitches and causing 2/6 of cryptorchydism and impairment of testicular histomorphometry in male dogs.
Asunto(s)
Animales Recién Nacidos/fisiología , Perros/fisiología , Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Maduración Sexual/efectos de los fármacos , Pamoato de Triptorelina/análogos & derivados , Envejecimiento , Animales , Anticoncepción/veterinaria , Criptorquidismo/inducido químicamente , Criptorquidismo/veterinaria , Enfermedades de los Perros/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Masculino , Ovario/anatomía & histología , Ovario/efectos de los fármacos , Ovulación/efectos de los fármacos , Embarazo , Testículo/anatomía & histología , Testículo/efectos de los fármacos , Testosterona/sangre , Pamoato de Triptorelina/administración & dosificación , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Triptorelin depot is largely used to treat central precocious puberty (CPP) in children. Areas covered: This review updates triptorelin depot treatment of CPP, focusing on trials that compared 3.75 mg/28 day treated and untreated children till the adult height (AH). Efficacy of the new 11.25 mg/90 days or 22.5 mg/6 month formulations in suppressing pituitary-gonadal axis in short-term trials is also addressed. Short- and long-term safety was summarized. Expert commentary: Long experience on triptorelin depot use in children with CPP is available. Outcome differences on AH are reported; they may be due to heterogenicity of treated patients; some items remain to be optimized. No long term-adverse events on reproductive function are reported; additional studies would clarify if CPP per sè or triptorelin depot administration may increase hyperandrogenism and/or polycystic ovary syndrome risk in adulthood. The quarterly formulation seems to be able to suppress pituitary-gonadal axis and pubertal development and to determine similar end-results as monthly formulation, but additional trials are needed. Few data are available for the 22.5 mg/6 month formulation. Triptorelin depot treatment of CPP should be restricted to tertiary pediatric endocrinology centers, considering that some uncertainties still exist and that rare but serious adverse events may occur.
Asunto(s)
Hormona Liberadora de Gonadotropina/agonistas , Pubertad Precoz/tratamiento farmacológico , Pamoato de Triptorelina/uso terapéutico , Niño , Preescolar , Preparaciones de Acción Retardada , Esquema de Medicación , Humanos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del Tratamiento , Pamoato de Triptorelina/administración & dosificación , Pamoato de Triptorelina/efectos adversosRESUMEN
To review direct comparative studies of the gonadotrophin-releasing hormone (GnRH) agonists goserelin, triptorelin, and leuprorelin for the treatment of prostate cancer, and identify whether there are meaningful clinical differences between these agents. In June 2017, the following searches were performed independently by two reviewers in PubMed: (i) 'prostate cancer' and 'triptorelin' and 'leuprorelin', (ii) 'prostate cancer' and 'triptorelin' and 'goserelin', and (iii) 'prostate cancer' and 'goserelin' and 'leuprorelin', without time restriction. Duplicates were deleted. Relevant conference abstracts were also screened. A total of 16 direct comparative trials were identified: 12 reported on efficacy outcomes, four on safety/tolerability, and five on the convenience of administration/user perceptions. These studies are restricted in terms of patient numbers, formulations assessed, and endpoints measured; none were adequately powered for survival outcome measures. Studies reporting on efficacy endpoints did not show major differences in the ability of these GnRH agonists to reduce levels of testosterone or prostate-specific antigen. Some studies suggest differences in short- or long-term testosterone control, the rate of injection site adverse events, and patient/healthcare professional perceptions, but definitive conclusions cannot be drawn from the existing evidence. Few direct comparative trials of GnRH agonists have been conducted. Whilst GnRH agonists provide a similar castration effect, there is not enough evidence to show that GnRH agonists are equivalent.