The outcomes and experience of people receiving community-based nurse-led wound care: A systematic review.

AIMS AND OBJECTIVES: To review the literature related to the outcomes and experience of people receiving nurse-led care for chronic wounds in the community. BACKGROUND: Chronic wounds lead to a poor quality of life and are an economic burden to the Australian healthcare system. A lack of awareness into the significance of chronic wounds leads to limited resources being available to facilitate the provision of evidence-based care. The majority of chronic wounds are managed by nurses in the community, and a better understanding into current models of care is required to inform future practice. DESIGN: A systematic quantitative literature review. METHODS: A systematic search was conducted in four electronic databases, and the inclusion criteria were as follows: English language, peer-reviewed, published from 2009-2019 and primary research. The data were compiled into an Excel database for reporting as per the Pickering and Byrne (Higher Education Research & Development, 33, 534.) method of systematic quantitative literature review. This review used the PRISMA checklist. The Mixed Methods Appraisal Tool was used for quality appraisal. RESULTS: Twelve studies were included in the review. Home nursing care, social community care and nursing within a wound clinic were identified as three types of nurse-led care in the literature. The findings demonstrate that nurse-led care was cost-effective, reported high levels of client satisfaction and contributed to improved wound healing and reduced levels of pain. CONCLUSIONS: Nurse-led care is a positive experience for people with chronic wounds and leads to better outcomes. The findings suggested a need for further client education and specialised training for healthcare practitioners managing chronic wounds. RELEVANCE TO CLINICAL PRACTICE: This review demonstrates that nurse-led care for people with chronic wounds in the community is cost-effective and improves client outcomes. Raising awareness into the significance of chronic wounds aims to promote the resources required to facilitate evidence-based care.

Change in the use of remote monitoring of cardiac implantable electronic devices in Italian clinical practice over a 5-year period: results of two surveys promoted by the AIAC (Italian Association of Arrhythmology and Cardiac Pacing).

AIMS: The aim of this study was to evaluate the use of remote monitoring in Italian clinical practice and its trend over the last 5 years. METHODS: In 2012 and 2017, two surveys were conducted. Both were open to all Italian implanting centres and consisted of 25 questions on the characteristics of the centre, their actual use of remote monitoring, applied organizational models and administrative and legal aspects. RESULTS: The questionnaires were completed by 132 and 108 centres in 2012 and 2017, respectively (30.6 and 24.7% of all Italian implanting centres). In 2017, significantly fewer centres followed up fewer than 200 patients by remote monitoring than in 2012, while more followed up more than 500 patients (all P < 0.005). In most of the centres (77.6%) that responded to both surveys, the number of patients remotely monitored significantly increased from 2012 to 2017.In both surveys, remote monitoring was usually managed by physicians and nurses. Over the period, primary review of transmissions by physicians declined, while it was increasingly performed by nurses; the involvement of technicians rose, while that of manufacturers' technical personnel decreased. The percentage of centres in which transmissions were submitted to the physician only in critical cases rose (from 28.3 to 64.3%; P < 0.001). In 86.7% of centres, the lack of a reimbursement system was deemed the main barrier to implementing remote monitoring. CONCLUSION: In the last 5 years, the number of patients followed up by remote monitoring has increased markedly. In most Italian centres, remote monitoring has increasingly been managed through a primary nursing model. The lack of a specific reimbursement system is perceived as the main barrier to implementing remote monitoring .

An economic evaluation of a computer-tailored e-learning program to promote smoking cessation counseling guideline adherence among practice nurses.

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an economic evaluation of a tailored e-learning program, which successfully improved practice nurses' smoking cessation guideline adherence. METHODS: The economic evaluation was embedded in a randomized controlled trial, in which 269 practice nurses recruited 388 smoking patients. Cost-effectiveness was assessed using guideline adherence as effect measure on practice nurse level, and continued smoking abstinence on patient level. Cost-utility was assessed on patient level, using patients' Quality Adjusted Life Years (QALYs) as effect measure. RESULTS: The e-learning program was likely to be cost-effective on practice nurse level, as adherence to an additional guideline step cost €1,586. On patient level, cost-effectiveness was slightly likely after six months (cost per additional quitter: €7,126), but not after twelve months. The cost-utility analysis revealed slight cost-effectiveness (cost per QALY gained: €18,431) on patient level. CONCLUSION: Providing practice nurses with a tailored e-learning program is cost-effective to improve their smoking cessation counseling. Though, cost-effectiveness on patient level was not found after twelve months, potentially resulting from smoking relapse. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: Widespread implementation of the e-learning program can improve the quality of smoking cessation care in general practice. Strategies to prevent patients' smoking relapse should be further explored to improve patients' long-term abstinence.

An exploratory cost-effectiveness analysis: Comparison between a midwife-led birth unit and a standard obstetric unit within the same hospital in Belgium.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to compare midwife-led and consultant-led obstetrical care for women with uncomplicated low-risk pregnancies. We estimated costs and maternal outcomes in both units to achieve a cost-effectiveness ratio. DESIGN: The cost-analysis was made according to the "intention to treat" concept in order to minimize bias associated with the non-randomization of participants. At the obstetric-led unit, women received care from both midwives and medical staff while those in the alternative structure called 'Le Cocon' only received care from midwives. SETTING: The obstetric-led unit of the Erasme University-Hospital in Brussels and its alongside midwife-led unit. PARTICIPANTS: The study population included all low-risk pregnant women from 1 March 2014 until 31 October 2015 who were affiliated to the MLOZ (Mutualités Libres-Onafhankelijke Ziekenfondsen; third Belgian statutory health care insurer). INTERVENTIONS: The cost calculation involved a bottom-up approach. The health care consumption of each participant was obtained from MLOZ's data. The study included costs occurred the beginning of pregnancy until 3 months post-partum. Clinical data were extracted from the patient medical records. FINDINGS: Compared to the traditional obstetric-led unit, the alternative midwife-led unit was associated with a cost reduction for the national payer (∆ = -€397.39, p = 0.046) and for the patient (∆ = - €44.19, p = 0.016). There were no significant differences in rates of caesarean, instrumental birth and epidural analgesia between MLU and OLU. A sensitivity analysis was performed (Appendix C) but does not change the overall results and conclusions. KEY CONCLUSIONS: Due to the small size of the samples, no statistical differences were found. More analysis is needed to evaluate the cost-effectiveness regarding the use of epidural analgesia, caesarean and instrumental birth rates in the midwife-led unit. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Given the economical findings, this could contribute to reduce health expenditures for both women (out of pocket) and state (public payer via health care insurers).

Four Years of CHEER: Cost and QALY Savings of a Free Nurse-run Walk-in Clinic Serving an Uninsured, Predominantly Spanish-speaking Immigrant Population in Providence.

Non-emergent visits to emergency departments by uninsured patients impose unnecessary costs on both patients and safety-net institutions. We evaluated the health and economic impacts of providing free, walk-in care to low-income, uninsured adults-most of them Hispanic-at a free clinic between January 2013 and December 2016. Providing access to health care services for uninsured patients at Clínica Esperanza/Hope Clinic reduced emergency department expenditures in Rhode Island by approximately $448,876 (range: $410,377-$487,375) annually and may have also reduced future healthcare costs for this population by more than $48 million ($12,034,469 annually) over the four-year evaluation period. For every $1 in funding for walk-in clinic operation, delivering free care provided a return on investment of $71.18 (range: $70.95-71.40) in healthcare value. Providing access to non-emergent walk-in care at the more than 12,000 free healthcare clinics nationwide may save billions in ED costs while improving the health of uninsured individuals.

A Cost-Benefit Analysis of A Community Free Clinic.

Uninsured patients lacking access to primary and preventive care continues to be an issue. The purpose of this analysis is to describe operating costs surrounding a nurse-driven freestanding community clinic and to calculate quality of life benefits using clinically preventable burden scores. A retrospective records review of patients (n = 200) receiving care at a free clinic were used. Annual costs were $387,252. The benefit gained in quality-adjusted life years is estimated to be 57.47-203.94 yielding a return on investment ranging from $1,200,264-$8,948,184. Free clinics have sustained cost savings over time. Policies addressing this form of care are imperative.

Case-control study of end-of-life treatment preferences and costs following advance care planning for adults with end-stage kidney disease.

AIM: The aim of the present study was to examine the efficacy of advance care planning (ACP) to improve the likelihood that end-stage kidney disease (ESKD) patient's preferences will be known and adhered to at end-of-life. METHODS: A case-control study of a nurse-led ACP programme in adults with ESKD from a major tertiary hospital. The primary outcome was the proportion of patients whose preferences were known (by substitute decision maker and/or clinicians) and adhered to by their treating doctors. Secondary measures were health system resource use and costs ($AUD) for a nurse-led ACP intervention in the last 12-months of life. RESULTS: In total, 57 cases (38 men, mean age 73.8 years) and 57 historical controls (38 men, mean age 74.0 years) were included. Cases (38/57, 67%) were significantly more likely than controls (15/57, 26%) to have their preferences known and adhered to by their treating doctor at end-of-life (P < 0.001). Cases (33/40, 83%) were also significantly more likely to withdraw from dialysis in accordance with their preferences than controls (11/33, 33%) (P < 0.001). For cases, the average hospital costs in the last 12 months of life was AUD $99 077 (SD = $71 002) per patient. The total cost of the ACP programme in 2010/2011 was AUD $26 821. CONCLUSION: Advance care planning was associated with improvements in end-of-life care preferences being known and adhered to for people with ESKD.

The cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led care program for breast cancer patients undergoing outpatient-based chemotherapy - A feasibility trial.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the cost-effectiveness of a nurse-led care program for breast cancer patients receiving outpatient-based chemotherapy. METHOD: An open-label, single-center randomized controlled trial was conducted. Patients receiving the nurse-led care and those receiving the routine care were compared in terms of quality of life, as well as in health service utilizations and total cost of care. A cost-utility analysis was conducted. RESULTS: A total of 124 patients were recruited. The data of 116 subjects who completed the study were used for the cost-utility analysis. There were 81 unscheduled hospital visits and 43 hospital admissions. The common reasons for utilizing health services were infections and fevers, skin problems, digestive system problems, and mouth/teeth/throat problems. There were no differences in health service utilizations between the nurse-led and routine care groups for subjects receiving four-cycle chemotherapy. For those receiving six-cycle chemotherapy, the estimated number of emergency department visits was 2.188 times (95% Confidence Interval, 1.051 to 4.554) higher for the routine care group when compared with the nurse-led care group (p = .038). The incremental cost-utility ratios were £8856 and £18,936 per quality-adjusted life year gained for subjects receiving four-cycle and six-cycle chemotherapy, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Cancer patients make unscheduled health service visits when receiving outpatient-based chemotherapy, which leads to increased health service costs. The nurse-led care reduces emergency departments visits made by breast cancer patients undergoing six-cycle adjuvant chemotherapy. For breast cancer patients undergoing four-cycle chemotherapy and six-cycle chemotherapy, the nurse-led care could be cost-effective.

Funding Academic and Clinical Nurse Strategies Through Joint Fund-raising Initiatives and Grateful Patient Engagement.

The Manatt report recommends a multipronged revenue portfolio to support academic health center (AHC) nursing: tuition, clinical practice, and external support. Most AHC nursing enterprises rely only on the first two-student tuition and patient billing. Philanthropy is not generally viewed as a viable revenue stream, especially for clinical nursing operations, but it should be. While health care's operating margins are shrinking, philanthropy continues to rise. In 2016, joint hospital and medical school fund-raising programs received an average of $100 million per organization. Nursing schools and hospitals concentrate on alumni and staff giving. As a result, the largest contributors to health centers, grateful patients, are missed. This is unfortunate, because gifts from grateful patients would add to the revenue pool and because the ability to express gratitude in a meaningful way seems to aid in a patient's recovery process. Evidence suggests that patients who actively express gratitude have a stronger immune system, lower blood pressure, improved ability to heal, less loneliness, and more joy, optimism, and happiness. By working together, schools of nursing and the clinical nursing enterprises in AHCs can create projects and initiatives that are very attractive to patients and families who value the tripartite mission of caring, teaching, and discovery. These patients and families wish to honor the nurses who have sustained them through their illness. Their philanthropy serves to honor nurses, fund relevant programs, benefit future patients, and aid in the donors' recovery.

Magnetic Stent Removal in a Nurse Led Clinic; a Nine Month Experience.

Ureteric stents are frequently inserted post endourological procedures. However, subsequent endoscopic stent removal requires a second procedure for the patient and the availability of necessary resources. Longer duration of indwelling stents can lead to increased risk of symptoms and complications. The use of magnetic stents removed with a magnetic retrieval device (BlackStar©), offers an alternative which obviates the need for cystoscopy. We assessed the outcomes for this novel method of stent removal in our institution. A retrospective analysis was performed of all patients undergoing magnetic stent insertion and subsequent removal in a nurse-led clinic over a nine-month period. Patients were followed up with a prospective validated Ureteral Stent Symptoms Questionnaire (USSQ)3. A cost analysis was also performed. In total, 59 patients were treated using magnetic stents. The complication rate was low (6.7%). The median duration of indwelling stent was 5.8 days (range 1-11 days). Patients reported haematuria and lower urinary tract symptoms but >90% experienced no functional impairment with minimal days of employment lost (mean 0.75 days). All patients reported satisfaction with nurse-led stent removal and 97% were happy to have stents removed via this method in the future. The total financial savings were estimated at €47,790 over this period. Nurse-led removal of magnetic stents is safe and well tolerated by patients and enables expedient stent removal. It also provides a significant cost benefit and frees up valuable endoscopic resources.

Economic evaluation of a nurse-led home and clinic-based secondary prevention programme to prevent progressive cardiac dysfunction in high-risk individuals: The Nurse-led Intervention for Less Chronic Heart Failure (NIL-CHF) randomized controlled study.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was to assess the cost-effectiveness of a long-term, nurse-led, multidisciplinary programme of home/clinic visits in preventing progressive cardiac dysfunction in patients at risk of developing de novo chronic heart failure (CHF). METHODS: A trial-based analysis was conducted alongside a pragmatic, single-centre, open-label, randomized controlled trial of 611 patients (mean age: 66 years) with subclinical cardiovascular diseases (without CHF) discharged to home from an Australian tertiary referral hospital. A nurse-led home and clinic-based programme (NIL-CHF intervention, n = 301) was compared with standard care ( n=310) in terms of life-years, quality-adjusted life-years (QALYs) and healthcare costs. The uncertainty around the incremental cost and QALYs was quantified by bootstrap simulations and displayed on a cost-effectiveness plane. RESULTS: During a median follow-up of 4.2 years, there were no significant between-group differences in life-years (-0.056, p=0.488) and QALYs (-0.072, p=0.399), which were lower in the NIL-CHF group. The NIL-CHF group had slightly lower all-cause hospitalization costs (AUD$2943 per person; p=0.219), cardiovascular-related hospitalization costs (AUD$1142; p=0.592) and a more pronounced reduction in emergency/unplanned hospitalization costs (AUD$4194 per person; p=0.024). When the cost of intervention was added to all-cause, cardiovascular and emergency-related readmissions, the reductions in the NIL-CHF group were AUD$2742 ( p=0.313), AUD$941 ( p=0.719) and AUD$3993 ( p=0.046), respectively. At a willingness-to-pay threshold of AUD$50,000/QALY, the probability of the NIL-CHF intervention being better-valued was 19%. CONCLUSIONS: Compared with standard care, the NIL-CHF intervention was not a cost-effective strategy as life-years and QALYs were slightly lower in the NIL-CHF group. However, it was associated with modest reductions in emergency/unplanned readmission costs.

Economic analysis of a nurse-led programme for comorbidities management of rheumatoid arthritis patients.

OBJECTIVES: Rheumatoid arthritis (RA) cause major functional, psychological, social and occupational repercussions for patients and has important economic consequences for society. The principal objective of this work was to determine the economic pertinence of a staff nurse specialised in preventive management for these patients. METHODS: The COMEDRA multicentre randomised controlled clinical trial, conducted from March 2011 to June 2012, showed the effectiveness of a nurse-led programme dedicated to the management of comorbidities trough the promotion of 11 preventive procedures. A cost-benefit analysis, from a societal perspective and based on direct medical cost, was conducted to assess the equivalence of the cost of the nurse-led programme and the cost of the additional preventive procedures performed, engendered by the programme. The programme was considered effective if its cost was less than or equal to the costs of the additional preventive procedures. The costs were calculated from the approved health insurance charges. From the total costs induced, a contributive share was measured, corresponding to the ratio of the total costs of each type of procedure to the overall total cost. RESULTS: The cost of the intervention was assessed at €16,804.2. This intervention contributed to the performance of 747 additional preventive procedures, at a cost of €30,184.8. This intervention with these patients is financially balanced when at least 37 patients follow the recommendations for every preventive procedure. CONCLUSIONS: From the hospital's perspective and from both a medical and economic point of view, a nurse-led programme to manage the comorbidities of RA is useful.

The economic impact of a nurse practitioner-directed lung cancer screening, incidental pulmonary nodule, and tobacco-cessation clinic.

OBJECTIVE: Lung cancer screening programs have become increasingly prevalent within the United States after the National Lung Screening Trial results. We aimed to review the financial impact after programmatic implementation of Advanced Registered Nurse Practitioner-led programs of Lung Cancer Screening and Tobacco Related Diseases, Incidental Pulmonary Nodule Clinic, and Tobacco Cessation Services. METHODS: We reviewed revenue from 2013 to 2016 by our nurse practitioner-led program. Encounters were queried for charges related to outpatient evaluation and management, professional procedures, and facility charges related to both outpatient and inpatient procedures. Revenue was normalized using 2016 data tables and the national Medicare conversion factor (35.8043). RESULTS: Our program evaluated 694 individuals, of whom 75% (518/694) are enrolled within the lung cancer-screening program. Overall revenue associated with the programs was $733,336. Outpatient evaluation and management generated revenue of $168,372. In addition, professional procedure revenue accounted for an additional $60,015 with facility revenue adding an additional $504,949. CONCLUSIONS: A nurse practitioner-led program of lung cancer screening, incidental pulmonary nodules, and tobacco-cessation services can provide additional revenue opportunities for a Thoracic Surgery and Interventional Pulmonology Division, as well as a health care system. The current national, median annual wage of a nurse practitioner is $98,190, and the cost associated directly to their salary (and benefits) may remain neutral or negative within certain programs. However, the larger economic benefit may be realized within the division and institution. This potential additional revenue appears related to evaluation of newly identified diseases and subsequent evaluations, procedures, and operations.

Post-cataract eye drops can be avoided by depot steroid injections.

There are over 400 000 cataract operations now being performed annually in the UK. With the majority of those patients being older people, comorbidities such as dementia or arthritis can prevent patients putting in their own post-operative eye drops. Where there is a lack of family or other support, district nursing services are often called upon to administer these eye drops, which are typically prescribed four times a day for 4 weeks, thus potentially totalling 112 visits for drop instillation per patient. To reduce the burden of these post-operative eye drops on district nursing services, administration of an intra-operative sub-Tenon's depot steroid injection is possible for cataract patients who then do not require any post-operative drop instillation. As a trial of this practice, 16 such patients were injected in one year, thus providing a reduction of 1792 in the number of visits requested. Taking an estimated cost of each district nurse visit of £38, this shift in practice potentially saved more than £68 000; the additional cost of the injection over the cost of eye drops was just £8.80 for the year. This practice presents an opportunity to protect valuable community nursing resources, but advocacy for change in practice would be needed with secondary care, or via commissioners.

Using Data Analytics as Evidentiary Support for Financial Outcome Success in Nurse-Led Population-Based Clinics.

Achieving the highest quality in health care requires organizations to develop clinical improvements that result in measurable outcomes for success. The purpose of this article is to demonstrate an example of clinical quality improvement through the use of data analytics to generate evidence for financial return on investment in two nurse-led, population-based clinics.

Effect of the Salary Model on Sustainability of a Professional Practice Environment.

OBJECTIVE: This replication study examined differences in RN perception of the professional practice environment (PPE) between salary- and hourly-wage compensation models over time. BACKGROUND: A previous study demonstrated that nurses in a salary-wage model had a significantly higher perception of the PPE compared with their peers receiving hourly wages. METHODS: A descriptive, comparative design was used to examine the Revised Professional Practice Environment (RPPE) scale of nurses in the same units surveyed in the previous study 2 years later. RESULTS: Mean scores on the RPPE continued to be significantly lower for hourly-wage RNs compared with the RNs in the salary-wage model. CONCLUSIONS: Nurses in an hourly-wage unit have significantly lower perceptions of the clinical practice environment than their peers in a salary-wage unit, indicating that professional practice perceptions in a salary-wage unit were sustained for a 2-year period and may provide a more effective PPE.

Life after PACE (Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly): A retrospective/prospective, qualitative analysis of the impact of closing a nurse practitioner centered PACE site.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Caring for frail older adults is a significant healthcare concern as the frailest 10% of the population account for over 70% of healthcare expenditures. Research reveals the use of comprehensive models, such as Program of All-Inclusive Care for the Elderly (PACE), leads to improved functional outcomes for participants and cost savings through decreased utilization. This study examines how closing a PACE program impacts health outcomes of previously enrolled participants. METHODS: Data were collected every 6 months for 2 years via phone surveys on 34 former participants enrolled in the program at the time of the closure. The survey included questions regarding satisfaction with care, activities of daily living (ADLs), instrumental ADLs (IADLs), emergency department (ED) visits, hospitalizations, and use of home health services. Deaths and nursing home placements were monitored. Outcomes were compared during and post-PACE. CONCLUSIONS: Higher numbers of ED visits, hospitalizations, and nursing home placements occurred post-PACE. PACE/post-PACE differences in ADL and IADL scores were not significant, nor were death rates. Higher satisfaction existed with PACE versus non-PACE care. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE: Comprehensive care programs such as PACE are effective in reducing healthcare utilization, thus limiting costs. Further work is required to maintain, develop, and support comprehensive models similar to PACE.

Are staffing shortages changing the culture of midwifery?

The effects of budgetary changes on midwives' practice environment have raised concerns in many settings. A survey of midwives and student midwives in the UK and Republic of Ireland in 2014 produced 280 responses. Staffing shortages were regarded as underpinning many changes, one of which was that of previously optional 'extra' activities, such as unpaid overtime, becoming mandatory. Shortages were aggravated in less acute areas by the transfer of midwives to more acute settings. One of the fears expressed by midwives was that a permanent change in the culture of midwifery would result. These phenomena are the everyday experiences of practising midwives, but they have failed to be addressed in the documents published by regulatory and review bodies.