Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 274
Filtrar
1.
Nutrients ; 16(18)2024 Sep 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39339727

RESUMEN

Introduction: Complementary feeding (CF) is the process of introducing solid or liquid foods (complementary foods, CFs) other than human breast milk (HBM) or infant formula into infants' diet when HBM or infant formula is no longer sufficient to meet infants' nutritional needs. Primary care pediatricians (PCPs) are paramount in guiding and educating infants' families during CF. Materials and Methods: Our exploratory survey aimed to investigate PCPs' current clinical approach to managing CF. From 1 March 2024 to 30 April 2024, a digital questionnaire composed of 32 multiple-choice questions investigating PCPs' attitudes toward CF in healthy, full-term infants was proposed to 1620 PCPs contacted through scientific societies. Results: The questionnaire was completed voluntarily; 707 PCPs (79.5% female, 66.1% aged over 50 years) fully responded to the survey in the proposed timeframe (participation rate 43.6%). Among the responders, 47.5% recommended traditional CF; 42.1% declared to know the baby-led weaning (BLW) approach and on-demand CF (ODCF), but only 32.8% and 12.5% of them recommended these types of CF, respectively. The vast majority (95%) of participants recommended that CF start between 4 to 6 completed months of age. CF routinely based on vegetarian or plant-based diets was supported by 45/707 (6.1%), only if planned by a specialist by 253/707 (35.8%), and only upon request by caregivers by 257/707 (36.3%). Egg and fish introduction was mostly advised in the first year of life, although in case of a positive family history of food allergy, 13.3% of participants recommended the introduction of egg and fish after 12 months. Conclusions: In conclusion, PCPs did not display a homogenous approach to CF; further studies and educational programs are needed to achieve more flexibility and knowledge on this important nutritional issue.


Asunto(s)
Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales del Lactante , Pediatras , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Femenino , Masculino , Lactante , Persona de Mediana Edad , Italia , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Destete , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Alimentos Infantiles
2.
Eur J Pediatr ; 183(10): 4435-4444, 2024 Oct.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39133303

RESUMEN

Chest radiography is a frequently used imaging modality in children. However, only fair to moderate inter-observer agreement has been reported between chest radiograph interpreters. Most studies were not performed in real-world clinical settings. Our aims were to examine the agreement between emergency department pediatricians and board-certified radiologists in a pediatric real-life setting and to identify clinical risk factors for the discrepancies. Included were children aged 3 months to 18 years who underwent chest radiography in the emergency department not during the regular hours of radiologist interpretation. Every case was reviewed by an expert panel. Inter-observer agreement between emergency department pediatricians and board-certified radiologists was assessed by Cohen's kappa; risk factors for disagreement were analyzed. Among 1373 cases, the level of agreement between emergency department pediatricians and board-certified radiologists was "moderate" (k = 0.505). For radiographs performed after midnight, agreement was only "fair" (k = 0.391). The expert panel identified clinically relevant disagreements in 260 (18.9%) of the radiographs. Over-treatment of antibiotics was identified in 121 (8.9%) of the cases and under-treatment in 79 (5.8%). In a multivariable logistic regression, the following parameters were found to be significantly associated with disagreements: neurological background (p = 0.046), fever (p = 0.001), dyspnea (p = 0.014), and radiographs performed after midnight (p = 0.007). CONCLUSIONS: Moderate agreement was found between emergency department pediatricians and board-certified radiologists in interpreting chest radiographs. Neurological background, fever, dyspnea, and radiographs performed after midnight were identified as risk factors for disagreement. Implementing these findings could facilitate the use of radiologist expertise, save time and resources, and potentially improve patient care. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Only fair to moderate inter-observer agreement has been reported between chest radiograph interpreters. • Most studies were not performed in real-world clinical settings. Clinical risk factors for disagreements have not been reported. WHAT IS NEW: • In this study, which included 1373 cases at the emergency department, the level of agreement between interpreters was only "moderate." • The major clinical parameters associated with interpretation discrepancies were neurological background, fever, dyspnea, and interpretations conducted during the night shift.


Asunto(s)
Servicio de Urgencia en Hospital , Variaciones Dependientes del Observador , Radiografía Torácica , Humanos , Niño , Preescolar , Radiografía Torácica/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Lactante , Adolescente , Factores de Riesgo , Radiólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos
3.
J Clin Pediatr Dent ; 48(4): 139-148, 2024 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39087224

RESUMEN

This study aimed to evaluate the level of knowledge, attitudes, and practices of general pediatricians (GPs) and pediatric subspecialists (PSs) practicing in Turkey toward oral health in children. A national sample of 642 pediatricians who attended the Turkish National Pediatrics Congress completed a survey consisting of 36 questions. The results are segmented based on sex, years of experience, and whether the pediatrician was a general pediatrician or pediatric subspecialist. Relationships between dependent categorical variables were tested using the Chi-square test. Four hundred eighty-seven questionnaires were completed, resulting in a 75.8% response rate; 69.8% of general pediatricians and 74.1% of pediatric subspecialists recommended the first dental visit before the first year or eruption of the first teeth; 62.6% agreed that pediatricians have a role in inculcating oral hygiene habits in patients; 98.2% of the respondents indicated they had performed oral examinations on their patients since birth; 72.8% of PSs suggested bottle-feeding to their patients, whereas only 33.5% of GPs did; 65.4% of PSs, 78.2% of GPs (p = 0.003), and 76.8% of the physicians with <5 years experience recommended fluoridated toothpaste under 2 years of age. There were statistically significant differences between the knowledge and attitudes of GPs and PSs. Female respondents were more knowledgeable than male respondents about oral health in children. Additionally, years of experience did not correlate with increased knowledge and proper attitudes toward oral health in children.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Salud Bucal , Pediatras , Humanos , Turquía , Masculino , Femenino , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Pediatría , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Higiene Bucal
4.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39200700

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance represents one of the most significant future health challenges in terms of both clinical and economic impacts on healthcare systems. The reason behind this issue is the misuse of antibiotics for the treatment of non-bacterial pathologies. The objective of this study is to investigate the factors underlying antibiotic prescription in pediatricians in the Lombardy region. METHODS: The study was conducted by means of a 32-item questionnaire that investigated both pediatricians' knowledge of antimicrobial resistance and the factors determining the choice to prescribe antibiotic therapy. RESULTS: A total of 253 pediatricians participated in the survey. Most participants (71.6%) reported as highly relevant the need for a national plan against AMR. However, approximately half of the respondents declared the phenomenon of AMR as uncommon in pediatric settings. Among the identified associated factors, diagnostic uncertainty was associated with a stronger fear of legal repercussions and the influence of parental pressure when prescribing antibiotics. CONCLUSIONS: The inability to diagnose the bacterial origin of an infection might be the primary driver of prescribing choices, rather than other non-clinical factors, such as parental demands or a fear of lawsuits.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Pediatras , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Humanos , Italia , Femenino , Masculino , Adulto , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud
5.
J Dig Dis ; 25(6): 380-393, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38992957

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate physicians' awareness and knowledge towards pediatric nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and their attitude toward change in nomenclature from NAFLD to metabolic dysfunction-associated fatty liver disease (MAFLD) or metabolic dysfunction-associated steatotic liver disease (MASLD) in China. METHODS: The questionnaire survey contained five parts (characteristics of the participants, epidemiology, diagnosis, management of NAFLD, and attitudes toward the nomenclature of MAFLD/MASLD). The participants included 53 hepatologists, 88 gastroenterologists (GEs), 74 endocrinologists (ENDOs), 61 primary care physicians (PCPs), and 157 pediatricians across 31 municipalities, provinces and autonomous regions of China's mainland. RESULTS: Hepatologists saw the largest number of pediatric NAFLD patients annually (median 9 [range 1-20]), with the lowest number by PCPs (even notwithstanding one patient annually). The primary sources of pediatric NAFLD knowledge were acquired via guidelines. Hepatologists had the highest total knowledge score among all five types of physicians. Approximately one-third of nonspecialists (ENDOs and PCPs) considered liver biopsy necessary for pediatric NAFLD patients, and this percentage increased to half in specialists (hepatologists and GEs). For nonspecialists, the major barriers to the management of pediatric NAFLD were poor patient adherence to lifestyle modifications and lacking confidence in managing NAFLD. Above 90% physicians agreed to change the nomenclature NAFLD to MAFLD; however, they were not sure whether it could reduce the economic burden. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the epidemic of pediatric NAFLD in China, a significant knowledge gap remains in the identification, diagnosis, and treatment of pediatric NAFLD, particularly among frontline workers such as pediatricians and PCPs. More education programs should be carried out in the future.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico , Humanos , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/terapia , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/epidemiología , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/diagnóstico , China/epidemiología , Niño , Masculino , Femenino , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Competencia Clínica , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos de Atención Primaria , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos
6.
Indian Pediatr ; 61(9): 878-886, 2024 Sep 15.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39051319

RESUMEN

Adoption provides a unique opportunity to establish stable family relationships and enhance the social safety net. In India, adoptions are governed by the Hindu Adoption and Maintenance Act, 1956, and the Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015, each with distinct eligibility criteria. Currently, approximately 33,870 Indian couples are registered as prospective adoptive parents (PAPs), and this number is rising. The Central Adoption Resource Authority (CARA) website lists 2,140 children available for adoption, with 731 being categorized as normal and 1,409 as special needs. CARA, under the Ministry of Women and Child Development, oversees both domestic and international adoptions of legally free orphaned, abandoned, and surrendered children. The scope of adoption has expanded from primarily young infants to include older children, children with special needs, and foster care, in line with the National Child Policy. Pediatricians play a crucial role in the adoption process, understanding medical aspects within the legislative framework and acting in the child's best interests. This involves collaborating with multiple stakeholders, conducting comprehensive pre-adoption medical examinations, and providing ongoing medical and behavioral support post-adoption. This review emphasizes recent changes in adoption practices in India and highlights the evolving role of pediatricians as champions for these children and their adoptive families.


Asunto(s)
Adopción , Pediatras , Humanos , Adopción/legislación & jurisprudencia , India , Pediatras/legislación & jurisprudencia , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Rol del Médico , Niño Adoptado/legislación & jurisprudencia , Niño Adoptado/estadística & datos numéricos , Preescolar
7.
Pediatrics ; 154(2)2024 Aug 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-39034835

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: The American Academy of Pediatrics recommends screening during the first 3 years of life for developmental risk/delay, maternal depression, and social determinants of health (SDOH) using standardized tools. Adoption of these guidelines has been gradual, and barriers to screening are as varied as pediatric practices are themselves. METHODS: We analyzed 2019 American Academy of Pediatrics Periodic Survey data. The survey included pediatricians' screening practices for developmental delay, maternal depression, and SDOH, and barriers to screening. We used Cochran's Q and McNemar's tests to compare barriers across topics, and χ2 tests and multivariable logistic regression to examine the relationship between barriers and screening practices. RESULTS: The survey response rate was 46.9% (n = 688). Most pediatricians reported screening/surveilling for developmental delay (98.1%), maternal depression (83.2%), and SDOH (76.7%), but fewer used standardized instruments to do so (59.0%, 44.9%, 12.6%, respectively). Those not screening/only surveilling for maternal depression were more likely to report that screening is not an appropriate role for the pediatrician and difficulty prioritizing time. For SDOH, those not screening/only surveilling were more likely to report instruments not available in the electronic health record, lack of knowledge regarding referral options, and lack of treatment options for positive screens. CONCLUSIONS: Rates of standardized screening, and barriers pediatricians encounter, have important implications for improving quality of early childhood preventive care. Opportunities include expanding the primary care team and integrating screening tools into the electronic health record. Programs to support social needs and maternal mental health could be strengthened to ensure robust referral options are available.


Asunto(s)
Discapacidades del Desarrollo , Tamizaje Masivo , Pediatras , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Femenino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Estados Unidos , Preescolar , Lactante , Discapacidades del Desarrollo/diagnóstico , Atención Primaria de Salud , Determinantes Sociales de la Salud , Adulto , Pediatría , Depresión/diagnóstico , Depresión/epidemiología , Madres/psicología
8.
Nutrients ; 16(13)2024 Jul 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38999893

RESUMEN

A multicenter cross-sectional study was conducted among 245 experienced Spanish paediatricians, who completed an online survey based on clinically relevant topics in nutrition during the first two years of life and their recommendations to parents in daily clinical practice. Most participants advise about the choking risk associated with baby-led weaning (BLW) and more than 60% consider that infants can receive an insufficient variety and quantity of nutrients with this practice. The general opinion is that there is a lack of evidence for delaying the introduction of gluten and other allergenic foods in the complementary feeding of healthy infants. Most participants agree/strongly agree that two servings of dairy products are the adequate daily amount in a diversified diet and 93.4% disagree/strongly disagree with the use of vegetal beverages under 1 year of life. There is a general agreement to avoid added salt and sugar before 12 months of life, the consideration that organic foods do not have a better nutritional profile than non-organic ones, and the limitations of vegetarian diets especially for adequate provision of micronutrients. Overall, there is an adequate knowledge of the new trends by paediatricians and younger ones seemed more in favor of them and interested in receiving more information on most topics.


Asunto(s)
Fenómenos Fisiológicos Nutricionales del Lactante , Pediatras , Humanos , Lactante , España , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Masculino , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Atención Primaria de Salud , Adulto , Recién Nacido , Destete , Preescolar , Estado Nutricional
9.
BMC Womens Health ; 24(1): 348, 2024 Jun 17.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38886697

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As global immigration from countries with a high prevalence of female genital mutilation and cutting (FGM/C) has grown in the United States (US), there is need for pediatricians to have adequate training to care for these patients. The objective of this study is to determine the level of knowledge and attitudes of child abuse pediatricians (CAPs) towards FGM/C in the US. METHODS: This cross-sectional study distributed a peer-reviewed survey to US CAPs-members of the Helfer Society-to assess their attitudes, knowledge, clinical practice, and education about FGM/C. Data was analyzed using descriptive statistics, Kruskal-Wallis tests, and Fisher's exact test. RESULTS: Most of the 65 respondents were aware that FGM/C is illegal (92%) and agreed that it violated human rights (99%). Individuals reporting previous training related to FGM/C were significantly more likely to correctly identify World Health Organization types of FGM/C (p < 0.05) and report confidence in doing so (p < 0.05). Only 21% of respondents felt comfortable discussing FGM/C with parents from countries with a high prevalence of FGM/C. Sixty-three percent were not aware of the federal law, and 74% were not aware of their own state's laws about FGM/C. CONCLUSIONS: US CAPs have high rates of training related to FGM/C; however, they need additional training to increase confidence and ability to identify FGM/C. FGM/C remains a topic that CAPs find difficult to discuss with families. With culturally sensitive training, CAPs have the opportunity to help manage and prevent the practice by serving as educators and experts for general pediatricians.


Asunto(s)
Maltrato a los Niños , Circuncisión Femenina , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Pediatras , Humanos , Circuncisión Femenina/psicología , Circuncisión Femenina/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Estudios Transversales , Maltrato a los Niños/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatras/psicología , Estados Unidos , Niño , Masculino , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Persona de Mediana Edad
10.
Hosp Pediatr ; 14(7): 507-513, 2024 Jul 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38832448

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Gender-based disparities in salary exist in multiple fields of medicine. However, there is limited data examining gender inequities in salary in pediatric hospital medicine (PHM). Our primary objective was to assess whether gender-based salary differences exist in PHM. The secondary objective was to assess if, among women, the differences in salary varied on the basis of leadership positions or self-identified race and ethnicity. METHODS: We conducted a survey-based, cross-sectional study of pediatric hospitalists in December 2021. Our primary outcomes were base and total salary, adjusted for the reported number of average weekly work hours. We performed subanalyses by presence of a leadership position, as well as race. We used a weighted t test using inverse probability weighting to compare the outcomes between genders. RESULTS: A total of 559 eligible people responded to our survey (51.0%). After propensity score weighting, women's mean base salary was 87.7% of men's base (95% confidence interval [CI] 79.8%-96.4%, P < .01), and women's total salary was 85.6% of men's total (95% CI 73.2%-100.0%, P = .05) salary. On subgroup analysis of respondents with a leadership position, women's total salary was 80.6% of men's total salary (95% CI 68.7%-94.4%, P < .01). Although women who identified as white had base salaries that were 86.6% of white men's base salary (95% CI 78.5%-95.5%, P < .01), there was no gender-based difference noted between respondents that identified as nonwhite (88.4% [69.9%-111.7%] for base salary, 80.3% [57.2% to 112.7%]). CONCLUSIONS: Gender-based discrepancies in salary exists in PHM, which were increased among those with leadership roles. Continued work and advocacy are required to achieve salary equity within PHM.


Asunto(s)
Hospitales Pediátricos , Salarios y Beneficios , Humanos , Salarios y Beneficios/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Hospitales Pediátricos/economía , Factores Sexuales , Adulto , Médicos Mujeres/economía , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Liderazgo , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatras/economía , Médicos Hospitalarios/economía , Médicos Hospitalarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Sexismo/estadística & datos numéricos
11.
J Hum Lact ; 40(3): 386-391, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38826038

RESUMEN

Pediatricians need to be knowledgeable to adequately carry out their role in the support of breastfeeding, so assessing their knowledge of breastfeeding is vitally important. There are not English language validated questionnaires for pediatricians in the literature; however, in Spanish and Portuguese, there is the Breastfeeding Knowledge Survey (ECoLa, derived from Encuesta de Conocimientos en Lactancia). Our goal is to translate the ECoLa into English. The original survey consisted of true/false questions, including one with an image of a breastfeeding baby, multiple-choice questions featuring clinical cases, and two open-ended short questions. We used a translation approach that incorporated both forward and backward translations and a multidisciplinary committee to evaluate the translation process. During translation, four Spanish versions and seven English versions were considered prior to consensus approval of the final survey. The intraclass correlation coefficient between the English questionnaire and the original Spanish version was 0.85 (95% CI [0.60, 0.95]). A sample of 51 participants completed the survey, resulting in a Cronbach's alpha of 0.78 for the English version (95% CI [0.70, 0.86]). The Breastfeeding Knowledge Survey is now accessible under a Creative Commons license, permitting its free re-use.


Asunto(s)
Lactancia Materna , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Pediatras , Traducciones , Humanos , Lactancia Materna/psicología , Lactancia Materna/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatras/psicología , Femenino , Adulto , Traducción , Masculino
12.
Eur J Pediatr ; 183(9): 3959-3968, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38926187

RESUMEN

Rituximab (RTX) is a chimeric monoclonal antibody that targets the CD20 antigen on B cells and is used in various autoimmune disorders. In this study, we aimed to measure the awareness of pediatric rheumatologists about the use of RTX through a survey. Between February and March 2023, a 42-question survey was sent via email to pediatric rheumatology specialists in Turkey. The participants were questioned for which diagnoses and system involvement they preferred to use RTX, which routine tests they performed, vaccination policy, and adverse events that occurred during or after infusion. Forty-one pediatric rheumatologists answered the survey. They prescribed RTX most frequently for systemic lupus erythematosus (87.8%) and ANCA-associated vasculitis (9.8%). Prior to the administration of RTX, 95% of clinicians checked renal and liver function tests, as well as immunoglobulin levels. The most frequently tested hepatitis markers before treatment were HBsAg and anti-HBs antibody (97.6%), while 85.4% of rheumatologists checked for anti-HCV. Clinicians (31.4%) reported that they postpone RTX infusion 2 weeks following an inactivated vaccine. Sixty-one percent of rheumatologists reported starting RTX treatment 1 month after live vaccines, while 26.8% waited 6 months. The most frequent adverse events were an allergic reaction during RTX infusion (65.9%), hypogammaglobulinemia (46.3%), and rash (36.6%). In the event of hypogammaglobulinemia after RTX treatment, physicians reported that they frequently (58.5%) continued RTX after intravenous immunoglobulin administration. CONCLUSIONS: RTX has become a common treatment option in pediatric rheumatology in recent years. Treatment management may vary between clinician such as vaccination and routine tests. WHAT IS KNOWN: • During the course of rituximab therapy, clinicians should be attentive to specific considerations in pre-treatment, during administration, and in post-treatment patient monitoring. WHAT IS NEW: • There are differences in practice among clinicians in the management of RTX therapy. These practice disparities have the potential to impact the optimal course of treatment. • This study highlights that standardized guidelines are needed for RTX treatment in pediatric rheumatology, particularly for vaccination policies and routine tests.


Asunto(s)
Antirreumáticos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Reumatólogos , Rituximab , Humanos , Rituximab/uso terapéutico , Rituximab/efectos adversos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Antirreumáticos/uso terapéutico , Antirreumáticos/efectos adversos , Niño , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Masculino , Turquía , Femenino , Reumatología , Enfermedades Autoinmunes/tratamiento farmacológico , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatría
13.
Eur J Pediatr ; 183(9): 3877-3883, 2024 Sep.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38888644

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) leads to elevated low-density lipoprotein cholesterol levels, which increases the risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). Since the first functional and morphologic changes of the arterial wall occur in childhood, treatment should start early in childhood to mitigate the elevated risk of ASCVD. Pediatricians play an important role in the detection and care of children with FH. In this study, we aim to explore potential gaps in FH care amongst Dutch pediatricians, in order to enhance their knowledge and awareness of detecting and treating children with FH. METHODS: An anonymous online survey, deployed using Google Forms, including 26 closed and semi-closed questions on FH care in children was distributed by the Dutch Association of Pediatrics via a newsletter to which the majority of the practicing Dutch pediatricians subscribe. In addition, we requested that the pediatric departments of all Dutch hospitals in the Netherlands distribute this survey personally among their employed pediatricians. Respondents were instructed to answer the questions without any help or use of online resources. RESULTS: Between September 1st, 2023 and November 1st, 2023, 158 (an estimated 11% response rate) Dutch pediatricians completed the survey. They reported a median (IQR) of 15.0 (6.0-22.0) years of experience as a pediatrician, and 34 (21.5%) were working in academic hospitals. The majority (76.6%) of pediatricians correctly identified a typical FH lipid profile but 68 (43.0%) underestimated the true prevalence of FH (1:300). Underestimation and unawareness of the increased risk of FH patients for ASCVD were reported by 37.3% and 25.9% of pediatricians, respectively. Although 70.9% of the pediatricians correctly defined FH, only 67 (42.4%) selected statins and ezetimibe to treat severe hypercholesterolemia. CONCLUSIONS: The results of this study suggest significant gaps in knowledge and awareness of FH in children among Dutch pediatricians. FH care in children needs improvement through educational and training initiatives to mitigate the life-long risk of ASCVD from early life. WHAT IS KNOWN: • Familial hypercholesterolemia (FH) leads to elevated LDL-cholesterol levels, which increases the risk of premature atherosclerotic cardiovascular disease (ASCVD). • The process of atherosclerosis starts in childhood • Pediatricians play an important role in the detection and treatment of children with FH. WHAT IS NEW: • Our results highlight significant gaps in care for children with FH amongst pediatricians and this may lead to suboptimal detection and treatment. • FH care in children needs improvement by educational initiatives to ultimately prevent ASCVD in adulthood.


Asunto(s)
Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II , Pediatras , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Países Bajos/epidemiología , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/terapia , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/epidemiología , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/diagnóstico , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/sangre , Hiperlipoproteinemia Tipo II/tratamiento farmacológico , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Niño , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Brechas de la Práctica Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos
14.
Pediatr Obes ; 19(8): e13146, 2024 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38880989

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Recent pediatric guidelines recommend clinicians offer anti-obesity medication (AOM) as an adjunct to intensive lifestyle intervention. OBJECTIVE: To investigate pediatricians' perspectives about prescribing AOM, including barriers and facilitators. METHODS: An investigator-developed survey was emailed to primary care pediatric physicians (n = 187) and advanced practice providers (n = 190) within an academic-affiliated network. The survey evaluated how willing clinicians were to prescribe AOM and their agreement with 25 statements about barriers and facilitators. Three vignettes explored AOM decision-making. Multinomial logistic regression was used to determine relative risk ratios for willingness to prescribe by agreement with each statement. RESULTS: Among 74 respondents (20% response rate), 24% were willing, 42% uncertain and 34% unwilling to prescribe. Most (64%) agreed that AOM should be managed only by specialists. Willingness to prescribe was associated with clinician motivation and belief in guideline practicality and applicability. Unwillingness was associated with beliefs that patients would not continue AOM long enough for benefit and that there was insufficient time or resources to implement. In vignettes, 52% were willing to prescribe AOM for a patient with severe obesity and metabolic complications, versus 11% for a patient with obesity and possible disordered eating. CONCLUSIONS: Willingness to prescribe AOM was low and was associated with perceived practicality and appropriateness for patients.


Asunto(s)
Fármacos Antiobesidad , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Obesidad Infantil , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Obesidad Infantil/tratamiento farmacológico , Fármacos Antiobesidad/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Masculino , Adolescente , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Pediatras/psicología , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Persona de Mediana Edad
15.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1377803, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38784583

RESUMEN

Introduction: Mild respiratory infections are a common reason for consultation in paediatrics, both in the emergency department and in primary care clinics. These conditions, mostly viral and self-limiting, have a significant impact on the healthcare system, school and work absenteeism, and family routines. Despite being common and banal illnesses from a medical perspective, they involve a significant concern in families. The main objective of the contrast study was to compare the perceptions of parents and paediatricians regarding mild respiratory infections in childhood and their impact on family conciliation. Materials and methods: Two online, cross-sectional surveys were conducted among Spanish paediatricians and parents with children aged 6 months to 12 years, involving 504 paediatricians and 1,447 families, with questions on attitudes towards visits to the paediatric consultation, care burden of minor pathologies, work, and family conciliation, and treatment and prevention of these illnesses. Results: Results showed significant differences in paediatricians' and parents' perceptions in many aspects. According to 34.5% of paediatricians and 27% of parents, families regularly go to the paediatrician without a scheduled visit. Only 4% of parents report having self-medicated their child, while paediatricians raise this percentage significantly to 48%. Regarding the question: "it is normal for a child to have an average of 4 colds a year," only 25.5% of the surveyed families "strongly agree" unlike to 70.2% of paediatricians. 72.8% of paediatricians "strongly agree" with: "in my opinion, it is good for children to get sick to improve their immune system" reduced to 45.9% of parents. Consultations for minor pathologies represent a "high workload" for 60.9% of paediatricians, while this opinion is agreed by only 18.9% of the parents. Conclusion: Mild respiratory infections in childhood are perceived differently by paediatricians and parents. While paediatricians perceive them as a common and manageable phenomenon, parents tend to show higher concern and demand for medical attention. This study underlines the need to improve communication between paediatricians and parents to align perceptions, optimise the use of the health system resources, and improve the efficiency in the management of these common paediatric illnesses.


Asunto(s)
Padres , Pediatras , Infecciones del Sistema Respiratorio , Humanos , Padres/psicología , Pediatras/psicología , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Transversales , Masculino , Femenino , Preescolar , Niño , Lactante , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , España , Adulto , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Persona de Mediana Edad , Percepción
16.
Front Public Health ; 12: 1361509, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38756889

RESUMEN

Introduction: Gynecologists and pediatricians have an essential duty to prevent cervical cancer. In this study, we compared the compliance of gynecologists (n = 22) and pediatricians (n = 49) with nurse/midwife (n = 66) and non-medical moms (n = 120) with regards to cervical cancer precautions. Methods: A questionnaire was used to gather data on their demographics, personal vaccination and screening practices, children's immunization status, and awareness of cervical cancer prevention. Results: The findings demonstrated that gynecologists and pediatricians were better than others at understanding the risk factors and prevention of cervical cancer. It was noted that compared to other groups, physician mothers and their offspring had higher vaccination rates (n = 13, 18.3%; n = 10, 29.4%, respectively). Medical professionals typically provided thorough and accurate answers to informational questions. More frequent Pap smear tests were performed by gynecologists. It was noted that mothers who worked as pediatricians and nurses/midwives neglected their own screening needs. Discussion: This questionnaire survey sought to ascertain Istanbul's health professionals' present opinions regarding HPV vaccination. Healthcare professionals should be the first to receive information on HPV vaccination and cervical cancer incidence reduction. The public could then readily use them as an example.


Asunto(s)
Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Madres , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus , Pediatras , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino , Humanos , Femenino , Turquía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Neoplasias del Cuello Uterino/prevención & control , Madres/estadística & datos numéricos , Madres/psicología , Vacunas contra Papillomavirus/administración & dosificación , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatras/psicología , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermeras y Enfermeros/psicología , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/prevención & control , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ginecología/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Ginecólogos
17.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 24(1): 589, 2024 May 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38711087

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Previous studies have identified substantial regional variations in outpatient antibiotic prescribing in Germany, both in the paediatric and adult population. This indicates inappropriate antibiotic prescribing in some regions, which should be avoided to reduce antimicrobial resistance and potential side effects. The reasons for regional variations in outpatient antibiotic prescribing are not yet completely understood; socioeconomic and health care density differences between regions do not fully explain such differences. Here, we apply a behavioural perspective by adapting the Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) to examine regional factors deemed relevant for outpatient antibiotic prescriptions by paediatricians and general practitioners. METHODS: Qualitative study with guideline-based telephone interviews of 40 prescribers (paediatricians and general practitioners) in outpatient settings from regions with high and low rates of antibiotic prescriptions, stratified by urbanity. TDF domains formed the basis of an interview guide to assess region-level resources and barriers to rational antibiotic prescription behaviour. Interviews lasted 30-61 min (M = 45 min). Thematic analysis was used to identify thematic clusters, and relationships between themes were explored through proximity estimation. RESULTS: Both paediatricians and general practitioners in low-prescribing regions reported supporting contextual factors (in particular good collegial networks, good collaboration with laboratories) and social factors (collegial support and low patient demand for antibiotics) as important resources. In high-prescribing regions, poor coordination between in-patient and ambulatory health services, lack of region-level information on antimicrobial resistance, few professional development opportunities, and regional variations in patient expectations were identified as barriers to rational prescribing behaviour. CONCLUSIONS: Interventions targeting professional development, better collaboration structures with laboratories and clearer and user-friendly guidelines could potentially support rational antibiotic prescribing behaviour. In addition, better networking and social support among physicians could support lower prescription rates.


Asunto(s)
Antibacterianos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Investigación Cualitativa , Humanos , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Alemania , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Entrevistas como Asunto , Médicos Generales/psicología , Pediatras/psicología , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripción Inadecuada/estadística & datos numéricos , Pacientes Ambulatorios/psicología , Pacientes Ambulatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Ambulatoria , Persona de Mediana Edad
18.
BMC Palliat Care ; 23(1): 106, 2024 Apr 23.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38649882

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: As pediatricians play a vital role in pediatric palliative care (PPC), understanding their perspectives toward PPC is important. PPC is established for a long time in Belgium, but has a shorter tradition in China, although it is growing in the last decade. Sampling and comparing the perspectives of these pediatricians could be insightful for both countries. Therefore, we sampled and compared perspectives of pediatricians in China and Belgium toward PPC, and explored factors influencing their perspectives. METHODS: We conducted a cross-sectional online survey using the validated Pediatric Palliative Care Attitude Scale (PPCAS). Over a five-month period, we recruited pediatricians practicing in China (C) and Flanders (F), Belgium. Convenience sampling and snowballing were used. We analyzed data with descriptive statistics, and evaluated group differences with univariate, multivariate and correlation tests. RESULTS: 440 complete surveys were analyzed (F: 115; C: 325). Pediatricians in both regions had limited PPC experience (F: 2.92 ± 0.94; C: 2.76 ± 0.92). Compared to Flemish pediatricians, Chinese pediatricians perceived receiving less unit support (F: 3.42 ± 0.86; C: 2.80 ± 0.89); perceived PPC less important (F: 4.70 ± 0.79; C: 4.18 ± 0.94); and faced more personal obstacles while practicing PPC (F: 3.50 ± 0.76; C: 2.25 ± 0.58). Also, select socio-demographic characteristics (e.g., experiences caring for children with life-threatening condition and providing PPC) influenced pediatricians' perspectives. Correlational analyses revealed that pediatricians' PPC experiences significantly correlated with perceived unit support (ρF = 0.454; ρC=0.661). CONCLUSIONS: Chinese pediatricians faced more barriers in practicing PPC. Expanding PPC experiences can influence pediatricians' perspectives positively, which may be beneficial for the child and their family.


Asunto(s)
Actitud del Personal de Salud , Cuidados Paliativos , Pediatras , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Bélgica , China , Estudios Transversales , Cuidados Paliativos/métodos , Cuidados Paliativos/psicología , Cuidados Paliativos/normas , Pediatras/psicología , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatría/métodos , Pediatría/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
19.
Fam Syst Health ; 42(1): 34-49, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38647492

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Up to 20% of youth have impairing mental health problems as early as age 3. Early identification and intervention of mental health risks in pediatric primary care could mitigate this crisis via prevention prior to disease onset. The purpose of this study was to establish the feasibility and acceptability of implementing a brief transdiagnostic screening instrument in pediatric primary care for irritability and corollary impairment. METHOD: Five pediatric clinicians in a Midwest clinic implemented the Multidimensional Assessment Profiles-Early Assessment Screener of Irritability (MAPS-EASI) for toddlers (24-30 months) and their families. MAPS-EASI (psychometrically derived from the well-validated MAPS-Scales) includes six items (scored 0-5) about symptoms (e.g., tantrums, grumpy mood), context, and frequency and two items (scored 0-3) assessed impairment. Positive screens (MAPS-EASI ≥ 5 plus impairment ≥ 2) were referred to an evidence-based parenting intervention. We assessed reach and outcomes of MAPS-EASI screening. Follow-up interviews with clinicians assessed perspectives on irritability screening and MAPS-EASI implementation. RESULTS: Of 201 eligible families, 100 (49.8%) completed the screener for a 24- or 30-month well-child visit. Mean MAPS-EASI scores were 5.8 (SD = 3.2), mean impairment scores were 0.9 (SD = 0.9), and 24 (24.0%) screened positive. Clinicians indicated that irritability screening for toddlers was aligned with their prevention-oriented, developmentally based practice. MAPS-EASI had face validity and increased clinician decision-making confidence. Finally, clinicians identified barriers and facilitators to large-scale implementation. CONCLUSIONS: MAPS-EASI proved to be feasible and acceptable in pediatric primary care. Further tailoring will be needed as the MAPS-EASI processes are scaled out to new contexts and populations. (PsycInfo Database Record (c) 2024 APA, all rights reserved).


Asunto(s)
Genio Irritable , Tamizaje Masivo , Atención Primaria de Salud , Humanos , Femenino , Preescolar , Masculino , Atención Primaria de Salud/métodos , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Primaria de Salud/normas , Tamizaje Masivo/métodos , Tamizaje Masivo/instrumentación , Tamizaje Masivo/normas , Psicometría/instrumentación , Psicometría/métodos , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Pediatras/psicología , Pediatras/normas , Encuestas y Cuestionarios
20.
Respir Med ; 226: 107587, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38522591

RESUMEN

OBJECTIVES: Practice-to-recommendations gaps exist in croup management and have not been critically investigated. This study examined the therapeutic management of croup among a national sample of Italian pediatric providers. METHODS: A survey was administered online to a sample of primary care and hospital-based pediatricians. Demographic data, perception regarding disease severity, treatment and knowledge of croup, choices of croup treatment medications, and knowledge of and adherence to treatment recommendations were compared between hospital and primary care pediatricians. Oral corticosteroids alone, oral corticosteroids with or without nebulized epinephrine and nebulized epinephrine plus oral or inhaled corticosteroids were considered the correct management in mild, moderate and severe croup, respectively. The determinants for correct management were examined using multivariate logistic regression analysis. RESULTS: Six hundred forty-nine pediatricians answered at least 50% of the survey questions and were included in the analysis. Providers reported extensive use of inhaled corticosteroids for mild and moderate croup. Recommended treatment for mild, moderate and severe croup was administered in 46/647 (7.1%), 181/645 (28.0%) and 263/643 (40.9%) participants, respectively. Provider's age and knowledge of Westley Croup Score were significant predictors for correct management of mild croup. Being a hospital pediatrician and perception of croup as a clinically relevant condition were significant for moderate croup. CONCLUSIONS: Significant differences exist between recommended guidelines and clinical practice in croup management. This study suggests wide variability in both the treatment of croup and clinical decision making strategies among hospital and primary care pediatricians. Addressing this issue could lead to noteworthy clinical and economic benefits.


Asunto(s)
Corticoesteroides , Crup , Pediatras , Humanos , Crup/tratamiento farmacológico , Italia , Pediatras/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Corticoesteroides/administración & dosificación , Corticoesteroides/uso terapéutico , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Administración por Inhalación , Epinefrina/administración & dosificación , Epinefrina/uso terapéutico , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Administración Oral , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nebulizadores y Vaporizadores , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Niño , Atención Primaria de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA
...