Analyses of the association between Helicobacter pylori antibody titre and pathogenicity before and after eradication: results of the Kyushu and Okinawa population study, a retrospective observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVES: To assess the utility of Helicobacter pylori antibody testing, we evaluated the correlation between the H. pylori antibody titre and H. pylori-associated pathogenicity and the changes in antibody titre after H. pylori eradication therapy. DESIGN: A retrospective observational cohort study. SETTING AND PARTICIPANTS: From 2004 to 2016, medical check-ups were performed in different regions of Japan. In total, 324 subjects infected with H. pylori who received H. pylori eradication therapy were enrolled; H. pylori was eradicated in 266 of these subjects. We examined the associations between H. pylori antibody titre with pepsinogen and the presence or absence of H. pylori-associated pathogenic proteins, such as cytotoxin-associated gene A and vacuolating cytotoxin gene A, at baseline and after H. pylori eradication therapy. RESULTS: The H.pylori antibody titre showed a positive correlation with pepsinogen II and a negative correlation with the pepsinogen I/II ratio. Moreover, the H.pylori antibody titre significantly correlated with the positive rates of H. pylori-associated pathogenic protein before eradication therapy. Antibody titres decreased after eradication, the pepsinogen I/II ratio increased and the H. pylori-associated pathogenic protein-positive rate decreased in patients with successful eradication. The determination of eradication using the decline in antibody titre 6 months after eradication therapy was useful (area under the receiver operating characteristic curve: 0.98). CONCLUSIONS: Our data indicate that the H. pylori antibody titre may represent the degree of pathogenicity. The H. pylori antibody titre was associated with attenuation of pathogenicity in patients with H. pylori eradication, indicating the clinical utility of H. pylori antibody testing.

The role of gastrin 17 and pepsinogen I:pepsinogen II ratio in pathological diagnosis and endoscopic selection in gastritis patients.

BACKGROUND: The noninvasive serum markers pepsinogen I (PGI), pepsinogen II (PGII), gastrin-17 (G17), and PGI:PGII ratio (PGR) have recently been proposed as a new tool for predicting various gastric pathologies. METHODS: A total of 83 gastritis patients confirmed by gastroscopy were enrolled, with 78 undergoing concurrent colonoscopies. The control group included 99 healthy subjects. Enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay was used to detect PGI, PGII, G17, and PGR. The performance of serological analysis for detecting gastritis pathology was evaluated using receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves. RESULTS: The G17 and PGII levels increased significantly (P < .001), whereas PGR levels decreased (P = .001) in the gastritis group. The ROC analysis revealed that PGR had a sensitivity and specificity of 70.83% and 86.67%, respectively, in predicting Helicobacter pylori-infected gastritis and a sensitivity and specificity of 88% and 65.52%, respectively, in predicting active gastritis. The G17 levels were significantly elevated in gastritis patients undergoing concurrent colonoscopies (P < .05). CONCLUSION: Pepsinogen I:pepsinogen II ratio was found to be a useful predictor of active gastritis and H pylori-infected gastritis. Furthermore, G17 was found to be closely related to pathological conditions found by colonoscopy and may provide recommendations for whether gastritis patients should undergo a concurrent colonoscopy.

Airway pepsinogen A4 identifies lung transplant recipients with microaspiration and predicts chronic lung allograft dysfunction.

BACKGROUND: Aspiration is a known risk factor for adverse outcomes post-lung transplantation. Airway bile acids are the gold-standard biomarker of aspiration; however, they are released into the duodenum and likely reflect concurrent gastrointestinal dysmotility. Previous studies investigating total airway pepsin have found conflicting results on its relationship with adverse outcomes post-lung transplantation. These studies measured total pepsin and pepsinogen in the airways. Certain pepsinogens are constitutively expressed in the lungs, while others, such as pepsinogen A4 (PGA4), are not. We sought to evaluate the utility of measuring airway PGA4 as a biomarker of aspiration and predictor of adverse outcomes in lung transplant recipients (LTRs) early post-transplant. METHODS: Expression of PGA4 was compared to other pepsinogens in lung tissue. Total pepsin and PGA4 were measured in large airway bronchial washings and compared to preexisting markers of aspiration. Two independent cohorts of LTRs were used to assess the relationship between airway PGA4 and chronic lung allograft dysfunction (CLAD). Changes to airway PGA4 after antireflux surgery were assessed in a third cohort of LTRs. RESULTS: PGA4 was expressed in healthy human stomach but not lung. Airway PGA4, but not total pepsin, was associated with aspiration. Airway PGA4 was associated with an increased risk of CLAD in two independent cohorts of LTRs. Antireflux surgery was associated with reduced airway PGA4. CONCLUSIONS: Airway PGA4 is a marker of aspiration that predicts CLAD in LTRs. Measuring PGA4 at surveillance bronchoscopies can help triage high-risk LTRs for anti-reflux surgery.

Pepsinógenos séricos para detectar cáncer gástrico en Costa Rica / Serum pepsinogen in screening for gastric cancer in Costa Rica

Las concentraciones de pepsinógenos (PG) I y II en suero, reflejan el estado funcional y morfológico de la mucosa gástrica. En este estudio se determinaron los puntos de corte óptimos de los niveles séricos de PGI, PGII y de la razón PGI/PGII, para identificar a las personas con alto riesgo de cáncer gástrico en una población de alto riesgo en Costa Rica. La población en estudio estaba formada por 338 personas sin cáncer gástrico y por 20 pacientes con cáncer gástrico. Los niveles de PGI y el valor de PGI/PGII fueron significativamente más bajos en las personas con cáncer gástrico que en los controles. Los puntos de corte óptimos para la detección de cáncer gástrico fueron de PGI ¾ 2,5. Usando estos puntos de corte la sensibilidad y especificidad fueron de 90 y 64 por ciento. Las concentraciones bajas de PGI y valores bajos de PGI/PGII indican alto riesgo de presentar un cáncer gástrico. El tamizaje por medio de pepsinógenos es simple y relativamente barato, sin embargo el beneficio real de esta prueba debe determinarse en el impacto sobre las tasas de mortalidad por cáncer gástrico