RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This study aimed to evaluate the learning curve for laparoscopic colectomy of a surgical fellow in an university colorectal unit using a structured training protocol. METHODS: This study analyzed the data from 100 consecutive patients who had laparoscopic colectomy performed by a surgical fellow between 11/2004 and 12/2007. The structured training protocol required the fellow to assist more than 40 laparoscopic colectomies before embarking on his first case. Rectosigmoidectomy was prioritized during the initial experience. Operative times were analyzed to represent the learning curve. Other outcome data including conversion and operative outcome were also evaluated. RESULTS: The following procedures were performed: 49 rectosigmoidectomies, 38 right colon resections, and 13 other resections. Median operative time was 150 min, and conversion rate was 1%. Overall postoperative morbidity rate was 28% (major morbidity 3%). Three patients required early reoperation. There was no operative death. Median hospital stay was 8 days. Operative times reached their lowest point at period of cases 45-50, and remained relatively stable afterwards. Comparing the first 50 and second 50 cases, the only difference observed was more frequent presence of a supervisor in the theater in the first 50 cases (74% versus 52%, p = 0.02), while the other parameters including types of procedures, postoperative recovery, hospital stay, and morbidity rate were not different. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicated that laparoscopic colectomy training can be safely performed under a structured protocol. The surgeon can perform laparoscopic colectomies more independently after 50 cases, without jeopardizing the clinical outcome.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/métodos , Becas , Cirugía General/educación , Laparoscopía/métodos , Práctica Psicológica , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Colectomía/normas , Neoplasias Colorrectales/cirugía , Femenino , Hong Kong , Hospitales Universitarios , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/normas , Aprendizaje , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Cuidados Preoperatorios/métodos , Cuidados Preoperatorios/normasRESUMEN
We investigated the influence of resident training on anaesthesia workflow of three standard procedures--laparoscopic cholecystectomy, diagnostic gynaecological laparoscopy and transurethral prostate gland resection (TURP)--comparing 259 non-emergency resident vs 341 consultant cases from 20 German hospitals. Each hospital provided 10 random cases for each procedure, yielding 600 cases for analysis. Standard time intervals as documented in the hospital information system were: 'Case Time' (the time from the start of anaesthesia induction to discharge of the patient to the recovery area) and 'Anaesthesia Control Time' (which was the Case Time minus the time from the start of surgery to the end of surgical closure). Case Time was significantly shorter for consultants in all three procedures (p < 0.05, analysis of variance) and Anaesthesia Control Time shorter for consultants only in gynaecological laparoscopy and TURP. Patient comorbidity, patient age and geographical location of the hospital were not influential factors in the analysis of variance. We conclude that resident training significantly increases duration of elective operative times.
Asunto(s)
Anestesiología/educación , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/organización & administración , Cuerpo Médico de Hospitales/educación , Quirófanos/organización & administración , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/estadística & datos numéricos , Consultores/estadística & datos numéricos , Alemania , Investigación sobre Servicios de Salud/métodos , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Prostatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Third kidney retransplants have technical and immunologic hurdles that may preclude success, which is of particular importance in the contemporary context of discrepancy between organ supply and demand. METHODS: The outcomes of third renal transplant recipients (TRTR) were compared with those receiving a first transplant from paired donor kidneys to assess transplant success and complication rates. The Ontario-based Trillium Gift of Life Network database was used to identify deceased donors (n=28) who donated one kidney to a TRTR and the mate kidney to a primary renal transplant recipient (PRTR) from June 1977 to August 2006. RESULTS: As anticipated, TRTR were sensitized versus PRTR based on % panel reactive antibodies (24%+/-34% vs. 7%+/-14%, P=0.03). Delayed graft function (46% vs. 22%, P=0.05) and biopsy-proven rejection episodes (50% vs. 29%, P=0.01) occurred more frequently with TRTR despite greater frequency of induction therapy (74% vs. 35%, P=0.004). However, 1- and 5-year patient survival were similar at 93%, 83% and 96%, 87% for TRTR and PRTR, respectively. Accordingly, 1- and 5-year allograft survival censored for mortality, were comparable at 78%, 66% and 78%, 75%. Renal function was similar in both groups. Bacterial infections (43% vs. 18%, P=0.001) and wound problems (28% vs. 11%, P=0.09) were the only postoperative complications to occur more frequently in the TRTR. CONCLUSION: We conclude that third renal transplantation should not be discouraged based on functional outcomes alone.
Asunto(s)
Trasplante de Riñón/estadística & datos numéricos , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Adulto , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Transfusión Sanguínea/estadística & datos numéricos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Femenino , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Terapia de Inmunosupresión/métodos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Trasplante de Riñón/inmunología , Trasplante de Riñón/mortalidad , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Ontario , Análisis de Supervivencia , Sobrevivientes , Trasplante Homólogo/mortalidad , Trasplante Homólogo/fisiología , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Bariatric surgery was established at several Norwegian hospitals in 2004. This study evaluates the perioperative outcome and the learning curves for two surgeons while introducing laparoscopic Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (LRYGB). METHODS: Morbidly obese patients undergoing primary LRYGB were included. Lengths of surgery and postoperative hospital stay, and 30-day rates of morbidity, reoperations, and readmissions were set as indicators of the learning curve. Learning effects were evaluated by graphical analyses and comparing the first and last 40 procedures for both surgeons. RESULTS: The 292 included patients had a mean age of 40.0 +/- 9.5 years and a mean body mass index (BMI) of 46.7 +/- 5.3 kg/m(2). The mean length of surgery was 101 +/- 55 min. Complications occurred in 43 patients (14.7%), with no conversions to open surgery in the primary procedure and no mortality. Reoperations were performed in 14 patients (4.8%), of which five patients required open surgery. The median length of stay was 3 days (range 1-77), and 19 patients (6.5%) were readmitted. High patient age, but not high BMI, was associated with an increased risk of complication. For both surgeons, lengths of surgery and hospital stay were significantly reduced (p < 0.001), leveling out after 100 procedures. Reductions in the rates of morbidity, reoperations and readmissions were not found. CONCLUSION: LRYGB was introduced with an acceptable morbidity rate and no mortality. Only the length of surgery and postoperative hospital stay were suitable indicators of a learning curve, which comprised about 100 cases.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica , Derivación Gástrica/educación , Derivación Gástrica/métodos , Laparoscopía/efectos adversos , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Adulto , Factores de Edad , Índice de Masa Corporal , Femenino , Derivación Gástrica/efectos adversos , Derivación Gástrica/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Morbilidad , Noruega , Obesidad Mórbida/epidemiología , Readmisión del Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Atención Perioperativa/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In 2004 we performed the first robot-assisted laparoscopic prostatectomy (RALP) at Aosta, Italy. METHODS: Data about our first 150 RALPs are presented. RESULTS: Mean patient age was 65.2 (range 51-75) years; mean preoperative PSA level 7.9 (range 1.8-25.0) ng/ml. Nerve sparing was performed in 109 cases (72.7%) with lymph nodes dissection in 27 (18.0%). Operative time: patients 1-50, mean 213.3 (range 185-290) min; patients 51-100, 207.3 (range 185-335) min; patients 101-150, 171.7 (range 123-270) min. Two procedures were converted to open. Mean blood loss was 235 (range 20-1000) ml with two blood transfusions. One patient was reoperated for anastomotic leakage. Four patients were treated by colostomy and rectal suture for rectal injury (n = 3) or recto-urethral fistula (n = 1). The overall complication incidence was 13.3% (20 events), while mortality was nil. CONCLUSIONS: The incidence of complications is slightly higher than in major pilot centres but it is comparable, hence RALP also appears feasible in our italian peripheral centre.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/etiología , Laparoscopía/métodos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Prostatectomía/métodos , Robótica/métodos , Anciano , Volumen Sanguíneo , Colostomía , Humanos , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/cirugía , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Italia , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/cirugía , Prostatectomía/efectos adversos , Prostatectomía/instrumentación , Neoplasias de la Próstata/cirugía , Recto/lesiones , Recto/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Reduction in hospital stay, blood loss, postoperative pain and complications are common findings after laparoscopic liver resection, suggesting that the laparoscopic approach may be a suitable alternative to open surgery. Some concerns have been raised regarding cost effectiveness of this procedure and potential implications of its large-scale application. Our aim has been to determine cost effectiveness of laparoscopic liver surgery by a case-matched, case-control, intention-to-treat analysis of its costs and short-term clinical outcomes compared with open surgery. METHODS: Laparoscopic liver segmentectomies and bisegmentectomies performed at Ninewells Hospital and Medical School between 2005 and 2007 were considered. Resections involving more than two Couinaud segments, or involving any synchronous procedure, were excluded. An operation-magnitude-matched control group was identified amongst open liver resections performed between 2004 and 2007. Hospital costs were obtained from the Scottish Health Service Costs Book (ISD Scotland) and average national costs were calculated. Cost of theatre time, disposable surgical devices, hospital stay, and high-dependency unit (HDU) and intensive care unit (ICU) usage were the main endpoints for comparison. Secondary endpoints were morbidity and mortality. Statistical analysis was performed with Student's t-test, chi(2) and Fisher exact test as most appropriate. RESULTS: Twenty-five laparoscopic liver resections were considered, including atypical resection, segmentectomy and bisegmentectomy, and they were compared to 25 matching open resections. The two groups were homogeneous by age, sex, coexistent morbidity, magnitude of resection, prevalence of liver cirrhosis and indications. Operative time (p < 0.03), blood loss (p < 0.0001), Pringle manoeuvre (p < 0.03), hospital stay (p < 0.003) and postoperative complications (p < 0.002) were significantly reduced in the laparoscopic group. Overall hospital cost was significantly lower in the laparoscopic group by an average of 2,571 pounds sterling (p < 0.04). CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic liver segmentectomy and bisegmentectomy are feasible, safe and cost effective compared to similar open resections. Large-scale application of laparoscopic liver surgery could translate into significant savings to hospitals and health care programmes.
Asunto(s)
Hepatectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Anciano , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Análisis Costo-Beneficio , Femenino , Hepatectomía/economía , Hepatectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Costos de Hospital/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/economía , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparotomía/economía , Laparotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/economía , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Estudios Prospectivos , Escocia , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: In recent years, minilaparoscopic cholecystectomy (MLC; total size of trocar incision < 25 mm) has been increasingly advocated for the removal of the gallbladder, due to potentially better surgical outcomes (e.g., better cosmetic result, reduced pain, shorter hospital stay, quicker return to activity), but an evidence-based approach has been lacking. The current systematic review was undertaken to evaluate the importance of total size of trocar incision in improving surgical outcomes in adult laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). METHODS: The literature was systematically reviewed using MEDLINE and EmBASE. Only randomized controlled trials in English, investigating minilaparoscopic versus conventional LC (total size of trocar incision > or = 25 mm) and reporting pain scores were included. Quantitative analyses (meta-analyses) were performed on postoperative pain scores and other patient outcomes from more than one study where feasible and appropriate. Qualitative analyses consisted of assessing the number of studies showing a significant difference between the techniques. RESULTS: Thirteen trials met the inclusion criteria. There was a trend towards reduced pain with MLC compared with conventional LC, without reduction in opioid use. Patients in the MLC group had slightly reduced length of hospital stay, but there were no significant differences for return to activity. The two interventions were also similar in terms of operating times and adverse events, but MLC was associated with better cosmetic result (largely patient rated). There was a significantly greater likelihood of conversion to conventional LC or to open cholecystectomy in the MLC group than there was of conversion to open cholecystectomy in the conventional LC group [OR 4.71 (95% confidence interval 2.67-8.31), p < 0.00001]. CONCLUSIONS: The data included in this review suggest that reducing the size of trocar incision results in some limited improvements in surgical outcomes after LC. However, it carries a higher risk of conversion to conventional LC or open cholecystectomy.
Asunto(s)
Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/métodos , Analgésicos/uso terapéutico , Colecistectomía Laparoscópica/estadística & datos numéricos , Estética , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Dimensión del Dolor , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Dolor Postoperatorio/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/prevención & control , Satisfacción del Paciente , Náusea y Vómito Posoperatorios/epidemiología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The objective was an evaluation of operative time and estimated blood loss (EBL) as a function of experience in gynaecological robotic surgery. METHOD: A retrospective analysis of 40 consecutive cases (approximately one case/week) over a 1 year period using the da Vinci) robotic system was performed, using data from two institutions, Newark Beth Israel Medical Center and Hackensack University Medical Center. Information was obtained from a single surgeon. Among the 40 cases there were 17 hysterectomies and 23 myomectomies. Each patient met the criteria of benign disease. In each institution, a da Vinci) system using three instrument arms and a camera arm was employed for every operation. RESULTS: Tests of differences in means were performed to compare the two groups. In group I (cases 1-20) the mean uterine volume was 863.0 cc and was similar to Group II (cases 21-40) at 632.6 cc. There was no significant difference between the groups when comparing blood loss; means were 86 cc for group I and 62.5 cc for group II. Operative time between groups, however, showed a significant difference (mean of 211.8 min for group 1 compared to 151 min for group 2; p < 0.05) and console time demonstrated a similar trend (mean for group 1 was 159.8 min compared to 90.8 min for group 2; p < 0.05). There were no conversions to laparotomy. Body mass index (BMI) and prior abdominal surgery were not significantly different. Multivariate regressions on operative time and EBL were performed, controlling for uterine weight and volume. The effect of experience on operative time was significant and negative; the coefficient on EBL was not significant. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates statistical improvement in operative time after the first 20 cases for a single surgeon. This information could be used to establish criteria for training surgeons.
Asunto(s)
Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/normas , Aprendizaje Basado en Problemas/normas , Robótica , Estudios de Tiempo y Movimiento , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica/prevención & control , Volumen Sanguíneo , Competencia Clínica/normas , Educación Médica Continua/normas , Femenino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Ginecológicos/educación , Humanos , Histerectomía/efectos adversos , Histerectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Práctica Psicológica , Estudios Retrospectivos , Robótica/educación , Robótica/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/educación , Cirugía Asistida por Computador/normasRESUMEN
PURPOSE: This study compares open Hartmann's procedure reversal (OHPR) and laparoscopic Hartmann's procedure reversal (LHPR) in patients first treated for peritonitis (Henchey III or IV). METHODS: Fourteen patients who underwent LHPR during a 2-year period were compared with 20 patients who had previously undergone an open procedure at the same institution. RESULTS: Conversion rate was 14.28%. Operating time was shorter for the laparoscopic group [143 (90 to 240) vs. 180 (90 to 350) min, P<0.05]. Hospital length of stay was shorter for the laparoscopic group [9.5 (4 to 18) vs. 11 (6 to 39)]. Use of patient-controlled analgesia was not significantly shorter in the laparoscopic group [3 (0 to 4) vs. 3.5 (0 to 8)]. Morbidities observed in the LHPR group include a parietal abscess and an anastomotic stenosis without surgical treatment. The OHPR group had 6 complications: 1 anastomotic leak and 5 incisional hernias. CONCLUSIONS: LHPR with a conversion rate of 14.28% seems to be a method with shorter operating time and less morbidity compared with OHPR.
Asunto(s)
Anastomosis Quirúrgica/métodos , Colostomía , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Peritonitis/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Prospectivos , Reoperación , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is becoming popular for the treatment of acute and perforated appendicitis. Since it was first described, LA has been modified various times. We present the results of a new technique of LA conducted through a single port without exteriorizing the appendix to perform the operation. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Single-port LA was attempted in 38 patients (23 boys, 15 girls). Under general anesthesia, an 11-mm port with two 5-mm working channels or an 11-mm port through which a 10-mm scope (0 degrees) with a parallel eyepiece and a 6-mm working channel was inserted through the umbilicus. The appendix was grasped and dissected from the surrounding tissues with a single dissector or grasper. With a percutaneously inserted suture from the right lower quadrant into the peritoneal cavity, the appendix was pulled toward the abdominal wall after passing the suture through the mesoappendix. After mesenteric dissection with hook cautery, the base of the appendix was ligated with 2-0 polyglactin with a fisherman knot. The appendix was withdrawn into the trocar and extracted from the abdomen together with the trocar. RESULTS: Laparoscopic appendectomy was completed in 35 patients through a single port. A second port insertion was required in 3 patients. No peroperative and postoperative complications were encountered. Average duration of the procedure was 38 +/- 5.6 minutes. CONCLUSION: This unique method further improves the minimal invasiveness of LA because a single port is used. Single-port intracorporeal appendectomy procedure is a safe, highly minimal invasive procedure with excellent cosmetic results.
Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Laparoscopía/métodos , Técnicas de Sutura , Adolescente , Apendicectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , OmbligoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Respiratory failure is a leading cause of postoperative morbidity and mortality in patients undergoing pneumonectomy. The authors hypothesized that intraoperative mechanical ventilation with large tidal volumes (VTs) would be associated with increased risk of postpneumonectomy respiratory failure. METHODS: Patients undergoing elective pneumonectomy at the authors' institution from January 1999 to January 2003 were studied. The authors collected data on demographics, relevant comorbidities, neoadjuvant therapy, pulmonary function tests, site and type of operation, duration of surgery, intraoperative ventilator settings, and intraoperative fluid administration. The primary outcome measure was postoperative respiratory failure, defined as the need for continuation of mechanical ventilation for greater than 48 h postoperatively or the need for reinstitution of mechanical ventilation after extubation. RESULTS: Of 170 pneumonectomy patients who met inclusion criteria, 30 (18%) developed postoperative respiratory failure. Causes of postoperative respiratory failure were acute lung injury in 50% (n = 15), cardiogenic pulmonary edema in 17% (n = 5), pneumonia in 23% (n = 7), bronchopleural fistula in 7% (n = 2), and pulmonary thromboembolism in 3% (n = 1). Patients who developed respiratory failure were ventilated with larger intraoperative VT than those who did not (median, 8.3 vs. 6.7 ml/kg predicted body weight; P < 0.001). In a multivariate regression analysis, larger intraoperative VT (odds ratio, 1.56 for each ml/kg increase; 95% confidence interval, 1.12-2.23) was associated with development of postoperative respiratory failure. The interaction between larger VT and fluid administration was also statistically significant (odds ratio, 1.36; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.97). CONCLUSION: Mechanical ventilation with large intraoperative VT is associated with increased risk of postpneumonectomy respiratory failure.
Asunto(s)
Neumonectomía/efectos adversos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiología , Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar , Anciano , Estudios de Cohortes , Intervalos de Confianza , Femenino , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/efectos adversos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Oportunidad Relativa , Neumonectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Respiración Artificial/efectos adversos , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Volumen de Ventilación Pulmonar/fisiologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Video-assisted thoracoscopic surgical (VATS) technique for resection of cystic lung disease (CLD) may offer some advantages when compared with thoracotomy in children. METHODS: From September 1999 to August 2004, 6 pediatric patients underwent VATS for CLD. Patients were chosen for VATS based upon surgeon's choice. Data are expressed as mean +/- SD. The Children's Healthcare of Atlanta institutional review board approved this study. RESULTS: The types of lesions included congenital cystic adenomatoid malformations (n = 1), extrapulmonary sequestrations (n = 3), congenital lobar emphysema (n = 1), and bronchogenic cyst (n = 1). The extent of resection included lobectomy (n = 2) and excision (n = 4). Age and weight were 11.8 +/- 18 months (range 6 days to 4 years) and 7.5 +/- 3.6 (range 4.0-14.0) kg, respectively. Operating time was 103 +/- 70 (range 38-223) minutes. Chest tube duration was 1.2 +/- 0.8 (range 0-2) days. Morphine use on the first postoperative day was 0.2 +/- 0.3(range 0.05-0.20) mg/kg. Length of stay was 2.5 +/- 1.9 (range 1-6) days. There were no conversions to thoracotomy and no complications. CONCLUSION: VATS technique appears to be a safe and effective technique in managing CLD in children of all ages. More patients, however, need to be studied.
Asunto(s)
Quiste Broncogénico/cirugía , Secuestro Broncopulmonar/cirugía , Malformación Adenomatoide Quística Congénita del Pulmón/cirugía , Neumonectomía/métodos , Enfisema Pulmonar/cirugía , Cirugía Torácica Asistida por Video , Tubos Torácicos , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Enfisema Pulmonar/congénito , Estudios Retrospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to compare our initial (1994-1997) and recent (2001-2003) experiences in laparoscopic appendectomy (LA). METHODS: A 2-year (2001-2003) retrospective chart review of cases of appendicitis was performed and compared with data obtained from 1994 to 1997 cases. Operating and anesthetic times as well as postoperative outcomes were analyzed. Cases of conversion to open appendectomy were included in the analysis. RESULTS: Two hundred and thirty-three LA cases from 2001 to 2003 were compared with 119 cases from 1994 to 1997. Operating time decreased significantly from 58 to 47 minutes in acute appendicitis (AA) and from 80 to 58 minutes in perforated appendicitis (PA). Anesthetic time decreased significantly in both AA (82 to 71 minutes) and PA (106 to 84 minutes). There were significant decreases in the conversion rate in PA (23.4% to 3.5%), although no change was seen in AA. In PA, the incidence of postoperative abscess decreased from 36.2% to 16.5%. There was no significant decrease in length of stay, amount of analgesia used, time to resume regular diet, or incidence of wound infections and bowel obstructions. CONCLUSIONS: Ten years of experience in LA has resulted in decreases in anesthetic and operating times for AA and PA as well as decreases in the incidence of abscesses and conversion rates.
Asunto(s)
Apendicectomía/métodos , Apendicitis/cirugía , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Absceso/epidemiología , Adolescente , Analgésicos Opioides/uso terapéutico , Periodo de Recuperación de la Anestesia , Antibacterianos/uso terapéutico , Apendicectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Utilización de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Incidencia , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Ontario/epidemiología , Dolor Postoperatorio/tratamiento farmacológico , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Infección de la Herida Quirúrgica/epidemiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: In the pediatric population the failure rate of sclerotherapy for the treatment of varicocele has been reported to be up to 35%. Therefore, the aim of our study was to evaluate the efficacy of retroperitoneoscopic varicocelectomy (RV) in children and adolescents. METHODS: A total of 97 patients were operated on for left-sided varicocele using the retroperitoneoscopic approach between January 1999 and July 2003. Median age was 12.3 years (range, 6-16 years). A 10-mm subcostal retroperitoneoscopic port was used. The operation was performed through an operative laparoscope according to Palomo's technique, with the mass division of spermatic vessels after bipolar coagulation below the renal vein. Elective conversion to laparoscopic transperitoneal varicocelectomy was performed in cases of difficulties in identifying the vessels. The postoperative follow-up included clinical and ultrasound assessment (range, 6-48 months). RESULTS: A total of 17 (17.6%) patients needed elective conversion to laparoscopic transperitoneal varicocelectomy. In RV, the mean operative time was 28 minutes (range, 15-55 minutes), the mean hospital stay was 2 days, persistence rate was 11.2%, and hydrocele occurrence was 6.2%. CONCLUSIONS: Our results indicate that the RV is an acceptable technique to achieve the high division of the spermatic vessels. The advantage of this anatomic approach is its very low invasiveness.
Asunto(s)
Laparoscopía , Varicocele/cirugía , Adolescente , Niño , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos , Electrocoagulación , Estudios de Seguimiento , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Hidrocele Testicular/epidemiología , Hidrocele Testicular/etiología , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Open total colectomy and ileorectal anastomosis (OTC) is a major colorectal procedure which would preclude laparoscopy in many centers because of technical difficulty and the fact that laparoscopic total colectomy (LTC) takes much longer than standard laparoscopic proctosigmoidectomy (LPS). This study compares OTC with LTC and LPS. METHODS: In this study, 34 LTC patients (May 1999 to August 2003) were matched for age, diagnosis, operative period, and procedure with patients undergoing OTC. Patients with a previous major laparotomy were excluded from the open group. Groups were compared for gender, American Society of Anesthesiology (ASA) classification, operating time, estimated blood loss, length of hospital stay (LOS), complications including readmissions, and costs. The LPS cases were picked randomly from the laparoscopic database (every eighth patient), and the OT and LOS were noted. RESULTS: The LTC and OTC groups were matched for age (mean, 31 vs 34 years; p = 0.2), sex (14 vs 13 females; p = 0.8), ASA (8/23/3/0 vs 8/22/4/0, class 1/2/3/4). The body mass index was higher in the open group (23.8 vs 27.9; p = 0.04). The operating time was significantly longer (187 vs 126 min; p = 0.0001) and the median LOS shorter in the LTC group (3 days [IQR, 2.5-5 days] vs 6 days [IQR 4-8 days]; p = 0.0001). The estimated blood loss was significantly less in the LTC group (168 [50-700] ml) vs 238 [50-800] ml); p = 0.001, but there was no significant difference in the complication (26.5% vs 38.2%; p = 0.4) readmission (11.8% vs 14.7%; p = 1.0), reoperative rates (8.8% vs 11.8%; p = 1.0), or direct costs ($4,578 vs $4,562; p = 0.3). One LTC patient died expired on postoperative day 2 of a cardiac event. Four patients (11.8%) required conversion for obesity (n = 2), adhesions (n = 1), or intraoperative hemorrhage (n = 1). The operating times were 36 min longer in the LTC group than in the LPS group (151 vs 187 min; p = 0.02), but there was no significant difference in the LOS. (3 vs 3 days, p = 0.2). CONCLUSIONS: The findings show that LTC provides a significant decrease in the LOS over OTC, with increased operating time, but without any change in other parameters. A laparoscopic approach to subtotal colectomy is recommended for suitable patients when an experienced team is available.
Asunto(s)
Colectomía/métodos , Laparoscopía/métodos , Laparotomía/métodos , Sigmoidoscopía/métodos , Adulto , Anastomosis Quirúrgica , Pérdida de Sangre Quirúrgica , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Colectomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Colitis/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Neoplasias Intestinales/cirugía , Pólipos Intestinales/cirugía , Complicaciones Intraoperatorias/epidemiología , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Laparotomía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tiempo de Internación/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Sigmoidoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Electrical stimulation of the phrenic nerve motor point of the diaphragm through laparoscopic implantation of a pacing system is an option for high spinal cord-injured patients with chronic respiratory insufficiency. This study assesses the operative learning curve for the initial series of patients. METHOD: A series of six patients underwent laparoscopic placement of a diaphragm pacing system. The operative procedure was divided into the following four steps for analysis and rapid adjustment after each operation: exposure of the diaphragm, mapping of the phrenic nerve motor point, implantation of the pacing electrodes, and final routing of the wires to the external system. RESULTS: The first case required two operations, and the second case was unsuccessful because of a nonfunctioning phrenic nerve that led to a change in the preoperative screening criteria. The operative time decreased from 469 min for the first operation to 165 min for the sixth operation. The significant time decrease can be attributed to changes in the mapping and routing aspects of the operation. Key changes during this series that helped to reduce the operative time include abandonment of a software-dependent mapping technique, development of a grid algorithm for mapping, software improvement to increase the speed of stimulation and mapping, refinement of the mapping probe to maintain adequate suction on the diaphragm, shortening of the electrode lengths, and experience with the implantation of connections to the external electrodes. Presently, all five of the successfully implanted patients can be maintained on prolonged ventilatory support with the device. CONCLUSION: Analysis of every step of this investigational procedure enabled us to make rapid changes in surgical protocol, leading to decreases in operative times and expectant improvements in patient safety and efficacy. In this series, analysis was the key to developing a low-risk cost-effective outpatient diaphragm pacing system.
Asunto(s)
Diafragma/inervación , Terapia por Estimulación Eléctrica/instrumentación , Electrodos Implantados , Endoscopía/educación , Laparoscopía/métodos , Nervio Frénico/fisiopatología , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/terapia , Traumatismos de la Médula Espinal/complicaciones , Terapias en Investigación , Adulto , Algoritmos , Remoción de Dispositivos , Educación Médica Continua , Diseño de Equipo , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Aprendizaje , Persona de Mediana Edad , Respiración Artificial , Insuficiencia Respiratoria/etiología , Programas Informáticos , Terapias en Investigación/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Evaluate the feasibility and clinical significance of crystalloid prime reduction during the initiation of cardiopulmonary bypass (CPB) using a modified bridge on the cardioplegia delivery system. METHODS: Prospective trial of crystalloid prime reduction using a standard Duraflow-coated CPB circuit and Vanguard 2:1 cardio plegia delivery system. Standard prime volume was 1500 cc of Plasmalyte. Prime was reduced via the bridge in the cardioplegia system during initiation of CPB. Packed red blood cells (PRBC) were transfused for hematocrit (Hct) less than 24% while rewarming. A hemoconcentrator was used if the patient's circulating blood volume exceeded 150% of calculated. All data were prospectively collected. RESULTS: Two hundred and twenty-two consecutive patients undergoing cardiac surgery utilizing CPB were evaluated. There were 107 patients with normal prime volume (NPV) and 115 patients with reduced prime volume (RPV). There was no significant difference in sex, mean age, weight, body surface area (BSA), pre-op Hct, procedure time or procedure between the two groups. There was no difference in total crystalloids infused by the anesthetists (average NPV 1205 cc versus RPV 1148 cc). The average RPV was 622 cc (range 400-1100 cc) or a 59% reduction. Post-op Hct revealed no difference (NPV 28% versus RPV 29%). There was a 24% reduction in patients requiring PRBC (NPV n=23 versus RPV n=18). The use of hemoconcentrators was reduced by 49% (NPV n=18 versus RPV n =11). The average urine output for both groups exceeded 100 cc/hour while on CPB. CONCLUSION: Using a modified cardioplegia delivery system is a safe and effective method of CPB prime reduction. A RPV resulted in fewer patients requiring PRBC transfusions and fewer hemoconcentrators used. Based on our experience, we would recommend attempting to reduce prime volume in all patients undergoing CPB.
Asunto(s)
Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Cardíacos/métodos , Puente Cardiopulmonar/instrumentación , Puente Cardiopulmonar/métodos , Transfusión de Eritrocitos/estadística & datos numéricos , Hemofiltración/instrumentación , Hemofiltración/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Puente Cardiopulmonar/normas , Soluciones Cristaloides , Estudios de Factibilidad , Femenino , Hemofiltración/métodos , Humanos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Soluciones Isotónicas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Sustitutos del Plasma/administración & dosificación , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Strokes are a devastating complication of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) surgery. Previous work from 1992 to 2000 determined the principal mechanism of strokes occurring secondary to CABG. In the present study, we quantified the association between intraoperative and postoperative variables and stroke mechanisms while adjusting for patient and disease characteristics. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 13,897 patients who underwent isolated CABG in northern New England from 1992 to 2000. Data were collected on patient and disease characteristics, intraoperative and postoperative care, and outcomes. Strokes were classified as embolic, hypoperfusion, and mixed (hemorrhage, lacunar, thrombotic, other, multiple, and unclassified). We quantified the association between the intraoperative and postoperative treatment and course variables and the stroke mechanism while adjusting for patient and disease characteristics. Patients without strokes served as the reference group for the determination of odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: Variables associated with embolic strokes included cardiopulmonary bypass time greater than 2 hours versus less than 1 hour (OR, 1.5; ptrend.03) and postoperative atrial fibrillation (OR, 2.4; P <.001). The risk of hypoperfusion strokes was increased with the duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (OR, 6.4; ptrend.01) and postoperative atrial fibrillation (OR, 5.4; P <.001). Postoperative atrial fibrillation was associated with the risk of mixed strokes (OR, 1.7; P =.04). CONCLUSIONS: After we adjusted for preoperative factors, postoperative atrial fibrillation and increasing duration of cardiopulmonary bypass remained significant predictors of embolic and hypoperfusion strokes, although to differing degrees. Prevention and management of atrial fibrillation and avoidance of prolonged exposure to extracorporeal circulation may offer leverage areas for the improvement of stroke outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Puente de Arteria Coronaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Accidente Cerebrovascular/epidemiología , Humanos , Incidencia , New England/epidemiología , Periodo Posoperatorio , Pronóstico , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To perform a retrospective review in patients undergoing urologic operations during a 10-year period. Patient positioning is important before surgery to avoid pressure sores and other iatrogenic injuries. The reported risk factors have included a long operative time, diabetes, and malignancy. We have noted skin breakdown in patients placed on stabilizing devices and in patients with germline von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) gene mutations (a gene important in angiogenesis). METHODS: We performed a retrospective review in patients undergoing urologic operations during a 10-year period. Patient sex, age, blood loss, position, use of belt or Vac Pac, and diagnosis of VHL were correlated with skin breakdown. RESULTS: During a 10-year period, 382 patients underwent primarily renal and adrenal surgery. Fifty-five patients (14.4%) developed skin breakdown after surgery. Ninety-six patients had VHL gene mutations. Patient position and operative time were both significantly related to skin breakdown (both P <0.0001). The odds ratio for the position effect indicated that patients in the lateral position were at much greater risk than patients in the supine position (estimated odds ratio 8.1, P <0.0001). The odds ratio for operative time confirmed that patients experiencing longer operative times were also at increased risk of skin breakdown (estimated odds ratio 3.7 for each doubling of the operative time, P <0.0001). Patient sex, patient age, estimated blood loss, diagnosis of VHL, and use of belt or Vac Pac were not associated with an increased risk of skin breakdown. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with longer operative times were at greater risk of skin breakdown and required greater care during preoperative positioning. The other factors studied were not significantly associated with skin breakdown.
Asunto(s)
Adrenalectomía , Inmovilización/instrumentación , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/epidemiología , Úlcera Cutánea/epidemiología , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Urológicos , Adolescente , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/genética , Neoplasias de las Glándulas Suprarrenales/cirugía , Adulto , Anciano , Niño , Susceptibilidad a Enfermedades , Femenino , Humanos , Inmovilización/efectos adversos , Periodo Intraoperatorio/estadística & datos numéricos , Neoplasias Renales/genética , Neoplasias Renales/cirugía , Laparoscopía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nefrectomía , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/etiología , Postura , Úlcera por Presión/epidemiología , Úlcera por Presión/etiología , Úlcera por Presión/prevención & control , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Úlcera Cutánea/etiología , Úlcera Cutánea/prevención & control , Posición Supina , Enfermedad de von Hippel-Lindau/complicaciones , Enfermedad de von Hippel-Lindau/cirugíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To report our technique and early results of hand-assisted retroperitoneoscopic nephrectomy (HARN) for living donor transplantation and to assess its feasibility. METHODS: HARN was effectively and safely performed on 44 donors from July 2001 to September 2003 at Akita University Medical Center. We describe our techniques and experiences with HARN and compare the early results with those of 27 cases of open donor nephrectomy at our institution. RESULTS: The mean operating time was 260 minutes (range 173 to 445), the mean estimated blood loss was 249 mL (range 15 to 967), and the mean warm ischemia time was 2.2 minutes (range 0.8 to 6.4). These parameters were similar to those of open donor nephrectomy. Intraoperative and postoperative complications occurred in 1 (2.3%) and 2 (4.6%) cases, respectively, but they were all minor. HARN was converted to open nephrectomy in 1 case (2.3%) because of uncontrollable bleeding. All HARN donors were ambulant within 2 days postoperatively and could initiate oral intake on the first postoperative day. Regarding graft function, 41 recipients (93.2%) had an immediate onset of diuresis and 3 (6.8%) had delayed renal function. The serum creatinine 7 days and 1 month postoperatively was not significantly different between the HARN group and the open nephrectomy group. CONCLUSIONS: HARN for living donors is one excellent option for donor nephrectomy because the procedure does not require intraperitoneal manipulation, thus reducing the risk of abdominal visceral injury, and also because of the minimal warm ischemia time owing to rapid extraction of the kidney with hand assistance.