The characteristics of sexual behavior in blind men in Ganzhou, China: A cross-sectional study.

Visual stimuli play key roles in influencing men sexual behavior. However, few studies have explored the sexual behavior of blind men. To provide more information about blind men for the study of andrology by surveying the characteristics of their current sexual behavior. A questionnaire-based cross-sectional study design was performed. The questionnaire contained questions regarding demographic characteristics of participants, access to sexual knowledge, perception of the sexual partners' beauty, and sexual arousal. Blind men were interviewed face-to-face by the trained investigator. Complete questionnaires were collected from 54 participants, with an average age of 40.57 ±â€…9.80 years old. Eye diseases were the most frequent cause of blindness. In terms of sexual orientation, all participants were heterosexual. Notably, 90.7% of the participants reported to have had a sexual experience. Among those who had engaged in sexual behavior, 93.6% experienced sexual pleasure and 69.4% had a normal erectile function. Overall, 16.7% of the participants received sex education. The participants obtained sexual knowledge mainly through sounds from mobile phones, peer-to-peer communication, sounds of television and radio. Voice was the most frequent perception of the sexual partners' beauty, followed by figure, skin, and body fragrance. In terms of stimuli of sexual arousal, tactile sensation and auditory sensation in that order were the most frequent stimuli of sexual arousal. Stimuli of sexual arousal in blind men are mainly mediated by sound and touch. Blind men understand their sexual partners' beauty through auditory, tactile, and olfactory sensations. Blind men in Ganzhou lack formal and systematic sex education.

Digital Technology Use Among Older Adults With Vision Impairment.

Importance: Telehealth has the potential to improve health for older adults, but many access disparities exist, including for those with vision impairment (VI). Objective: To examine the associations between VI and digital technology access measures in US older adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This was a cross-sectional study that included Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older. Beneficiary data were obtained from the National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) 2021; data collection was conducted from June 2020 through January 2021. Data were analyzed September 2023. Exposure: VI, measured on categorical (distance and near VI [>0.30 logMAR], contrast sensitivity impairment [CSI; <1.55 logCS], and any VI [distance VI, near VI, or CSI]), and continuous (distance and near acuity [logMAR] and contrast sensitivity [logCS]) scales. Main Outcomes: Self-reported outcomes of digital technology access from the technological environment component of the NHATS. Results: Of the 2822 Medicare beneficiaries (mean [SD] age, 78.5 [5.6] years; 1605 female [54.7%]) included in this study, patients self-identified with the following race and ethnicity categories (weighted percentages): 575 non-Hispanic Black (8.0%), 132 Hispanic (7.0%), 2019 non-Hispanic White (81.7%), and 63 non-Hispanic other race (3.4%), which included American Indian, Alaska Native, Asian, multiracial, Native Hawaiian, Pacific Islander, or other specified race. A total of 1077 of 2822 patients (32.3%) had any VI. In multivariable logistic regression models, older adults with any VI had lower odds of having or knowing how to use a cellphone (odds ratio [OR], 0.58; 95% CI, 0.38-0.88), computer (OR, 0.61; 95% CI, 0.47-0.79), or tablet (OR, 0.68, 95% CI = 0.54-0.85) than peers without VI. In other models, near VI was associated with lower odds of having and knowing how to use a phone (OR, 0.56; 95% CI, 0.36-0.87), computer (OR, 0.57; 95% CI, 0.44-0.75), or tablet (OR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.52-0.81) compared with no near VI. CSI was associated with lower odds of having and knowing how to use a phone (OR, 0.66; 95% CI, 0.45-0.99) or computer (OR, 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55-0.93) compared with no CSI. Distance VI was only associated with lower odds of having and knowing how to use a cellphone (OR, 0.63; 95% CI, 0.41-0.95). Any VI and individual categorical VI measures were not associated with other outcomes of digital health- and nonhealth-related experiences. Similar associations were noted when vision was examined on a continuous scale. However, worse distance acuity (per 0.1 logMAR) was associated with being less likely to visit with family or friends on a video call (OR, 0.91; 95% CI, 0.84-0.98) and to order or refill prescriptions online (OR, 0.90; 95% CI, 0.83-0.97). Conclusions and Relevance: Results suggest that older US adults with VI were less likely to have access to digital technology than peers without VI, although no differences were noted in the report of digital health- and nonhealth-related activities. These findings highlight the potential for inequities that may arise in telehealth for older adults with VI and the necessity to develop strategies to improve accessibility of telemedicine for all.

Uncorrected Refractive Error in the African American Eye Disease Study.

Importance: Refractive error remains the largest cause of correctable visual impairment in the US. Correction of refractive error will reduce visual impairment and its associated morbidity but also improve quality of life and productivity. Objective: To determine the burden of and risk factors (RFs) associated with any uncorrected refractive error (UCRE) and unmet refractive need (URN) in a population-based sample of African American adults. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study, conducted from April 2014 to April 2018, included a population-based sample of self-identified African American participants 40 years and older from 30 contiguous census tracts in Inglewood, California. Participants underwent a complete ophthalmic examination and an in-home-administered questionnaire to assess sociodemographic, lifestyle, biological, medical, and health care and eye care usage RFs associated with UCRE and URN. Measurements of visual acuity (VA) were performed using a standard Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study protocol. Noncycloplegic automated refraction with supplemental subjective refraction was performed. UCRE was defined as an improvement of 2 or more lines with refraction in the better-seeing eye. URN was defined as an improvement of 2 or more lines with refraction in the better-seeing eye in those persons who were visually impaired. Sex- and age-specific burden of UCRE and URN were calculated, and multiple regression analyses were used to identify independent RFs. Study data were analyzed from May 2018 to December 2023. Exposures: Presence or absence of correctable refractive error. Main Outcomes and Measures: Self-reported sex- and age-specific prevalence of and risk indicators of UCRE and URN. Results: Of the 7957 eligible participants in the African American Eye Disease Study (AFEDS), 6347 (80%) completed both the in-home interview and the clinical examination. Of these, 6337 participants (mean [SD] age, 61 [11] years; 3997 female [63%]) with complete refractive error data were included in the analysis. Refractive error-related correctable visual impairment was present in over two-thirds of participants with visual impairment (68.7%). The overall prevalence of any UCRE was 14.6% (925 of 6337), and the overall prevalence of any URN was 5.4% (URN1 [those with presenting VA of worse than 20/40 in the better-seeing eye but who could achieve 20/40 or better with correction], 157 of 2893; URN2 [those with presenting VA of worse than 20/40 in the better-seeing eye but who could achieve an improvement of 2 or more lines with refractive correction], 155 of 2891). Conclusions and Relevance: Results of this cross-sectional study suggest a high burden of refractive error-associated correctable refractive error in African American adults, making it the leading cause of visual impairment in this population. Providing universal coverage for vision care and prescription glasses is an affordable and achievable health care intervention that could reduce the burden of visual impairment in African American adults by over two-thirds and likely raise the quality of life and work productivity, especially in this vulnerable minority population.

Objectively Measured Visual Impairment and Dementia Prevalence in Older Adults in the US.

Importance: Estimates of the association between visual impairment (VI) and dementia in the US population are based on self-reported survey data or measures of visual function that are at least 15 years old. Older adults are at high risk of VI and dementia so there is a need for up-to-date national estimates based on objective assessments. Objective: To estimate the association between VI and dementia in older US adults based on objective visual and cognitive function testing. Design, Setting, and Participants: This secondary analysis of the 2021 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a population-based, nationally representative panel study, included 3817 respondents 71 years and older. Data were analyzed from January to March 2023. Intervention: In 2021, NHATS incorporated tablet-based tests of distance and near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity (CS) with habitual correction. Main Outcomes and Measures: VI was defined as distance visual acuity more than 0.30 logMAR, near visual acuity more than 0.30 logMAR, and CS more than 1 SD below the sample mean. Dementia was defined as scoring 1.5 SDs or more below the mean in 1 or more cognitive domains, an AD8 Dementia Screening Interview Score indicating probable dementia, or diagnosed dementia. Poisson regression estimated dementia prevalence ratios adjusted for covariates. Results: Of 2967 included participants, 1707 (weighted percentage, 55.3%) were female, and the median (IQR) age was 76.9 (77-86) years. The weighted prevalence of dementia was 12.3% (95% CI, 10.9-13.7) and increased with near VI (21.5%; 95% CI, 17.7-25.3), distance VI (mild: 19.1%; 95% CI, 13.0-25.2; moderate, severe, or blind: 32.9%; 95% CI, 24.1- 41.8), and CS impairment (25.9%; 95% CI, 20.5-31.3). Dementia prevalence was higher among participants with near VI and CS impairment than those without (near VI prevalence ratio: 1.40; 95% CI, 1.16-1.69; CS impairment prevalence ratio: 1.31; 95% CI, 1.04-1.66) and among participants with moderate to severe distance VI or blindness (prevalence ratio: 1.72; 95% CI, 1.26-2.35) after adjustment for covariates. Conclusions and Relevance: In this survey study, all types of objectively measured VI were associated with a higher dementia prevalence. As most VI is preventable, prioritizing vision health may be important for optimizing cognitive function.

Population Prevalence of Vision Impairment in US Adults 71 Years and Older: The National Health and Aging Trends Study.

Importance: Existing estimates of the prevalence of vision impairment (VI) in the United States are based on self-reported survey data or measures of visual function that are at least 14 years old. Older adults are at high risk for VI and blindness. There is a need for up-to-date, objectively measured, national epidemiological estimates. Objective: To present updated national epidemiological estimates of VI and blindness in older US adults based on objective visual function testing. Design, Setting, and Participants: This survey study presents a secondary data analysis of the 2021 National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS), a population-based, nationally representative panel study of Medicare beneficiaries 65 years and older. NHATS includes community-dwelling older adults or their proxies who complete in-person interviews; annual follow-up interviews are conducted regardless of residential status. Round 11 NHATS data were collected from June to November 2021, and data were analyzed in August 2022. Interventions: In 2021, NHATS incorporated tablet-based tests of distance and near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity with habitual correction. Main Outcomes and Measures: National prevalence of impairment in presenting distance visual acuity (>0.30 logMAR, Snellen equivalent worse than 20/40), presenting near visual acuity (>0.30 logMAR, Snellen equivalent worse than 20/40), and contrast sensitivity (>1 SD below the sample mean). Prevalence estimates stratified by age and socioeconomic and demographic data were calculated. Results: In the 2021 round 11 NHATS sample, there were 3817 respondents. After excluding respondents who did not complete the sample person interview (n = 429) and those with missing vision data (n = 362), there were 3026 participants. Of these, 29.5% (95% CI, 27.3%-31.8%) were 71 to 74 years old, and 55.2% (95% CI, 52.8%-57.6%) were female respondents. The prevalence of VI in US adults 71 years and older was 27.8% (95% CI, 25.5%-30.1%). Distance and near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity impairments were prevalent in 10.3% (95% CI, 8.9%-11.7%), 22.3% (95% CI, 20.3%-24.3%), and 10.0% (95% CI, 8.5%-11.4%), respectively. Older age, less education, and lower income were associated with all types of VI. A higher prevalence of near visual acuity and contrast sensitivity impairments was associated with non-White race and Hispanic ethnicity. Conclusions and Relevance: More than 1 in 4 US adults 71 years and older had VI in 2021, higher than prior estimates. Differences in the prevalence of VI by socioeconomic and demographic factors were observed. These data could inform public health planning.

Prevalence and causes of visual impairment and blindness in Lao People's Democratic Republic: the Vientiane Eye Study.

AIMS: To determine the prevalence and causes of visual impairment and blindness in Vientiane Province, the Lao People's Democratic Republic (Lao PDR). METHODS: We conducted a population-based, cross-sectional study of 1264 participants aged 40 years and older from urban and rural areas of Vientiane Province. The ophthalmic examination included presenting and pinhole Snellen visual acuity (VA) with an illiterate E chart, slit-lamp examination of the anterior segment and dilated stereoscopic fundus examination. Visual impairment and blindness were defined by both presenting and pinhole VA based on the better eye according to WHO criteria: VA worse than 6/12 to 6/18 for mild impairment, VA worse than 6/18 to 6/60 for moderate impairment, VA worse than 6/60 to 3/60 for severe impairment and VA worse than 3/60 for blindness. RESULTS: Comprehensive ophthalmic examinations were performed on 1264 participants (77.8% participation rate). Population-weighted prevalence of presenting bilateral blindness was 1.4% (95% CI 0.8 to 2.0) and bilateral visual impairment was 22.4% (95% CI 14.7 to 30.1). After pinhole correction, the corresponding prevalence of blindness was 1.3% (95% CI 0.8 to 2.0) and that of visual impairment was 12.6% (95% CI 8.2 to 16.9). Cataract was the leading cause of presenting bilateral blindness (52.9%), whereas uncorrected refractive error was the predominant cause of presenting visual impairment (40.3%). CONCLUSIONS: Visual impairment and blindness remain major public health problems in Lao PDR. There is an ongoing need to fund ophthalmic care resources and community education programmes to improve access to healthcare in this region.

Causes of Blindness in Adults in Southern Turkey According to Health Committee Reports

Objectives: To reveal the causes of blindness in patients who applied to the medical board of a hospital serving the Southeastern Anatolian region of Turkey. Materials and Methods: We retrospectively reviewed the records of 340 bilaterally blind patients who were among 3,234 patients referred to our hospital's medical board between March 2016 and November 2018 for disability evaluation and rating report. Results: One-hundred sixty (48.8%) were female, 174 (51.2%) were male, and the mean patient age was 64.3±25.4 years. The most common cause of blindness was cataract in 158 eyes (23.2%), followed by corneal opacities in 114 eyes (16.8%), retinal dystrophy in 92 eyes (13.5%), optic atrophy in 73 eyes (10.7%), glaucoma in 65 eyes (9.6%), and phthisis bulbi in 59 eyes (8.7%). Conclusion: Avoidable causes of blindness such as cataract and corneal opacity (secondary to trachoma) were detected at high rates. Therefore, we believe that more awareness and effort might be required in our region to reduce avoidable blindness due to these causes.

Screening for Open-Angle Glaucoma and Its Effect on Blindness.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the effect of population screening on low vision and blindness from open-angle glaucoma. DESIGN: Retrospective cohort study. METHODS: A large population-based screening for glaucoma was conducted in Malmö, Sweden, from 1992 to 1997. A total of 42,497 subjects were invited, of which 32,918 were screened, and 9,579 were non-responders (ie, did not participate). The records of glaucoma patients who had visited the Department of Ophthalmology at Malmö University Hospital from January 1, 1987, to December 31, 2017, were reviewed. Patients diagnosed at or after the screening were assessed for moderate or severe vision impairment, here called low vision, or blindness by the World Health Organization definition. Selection bias was corrected by creating a group of potential screening participants from a comparison group of clinical patients. Main outcome measures were the risk ratios of the cumulative incidence for bilateral low vision or blindness caused by glaucoma in screened patients compared with the potential participants. RESULTS: The cumulative incidence of blindness was 0.17% in the screened population versus 0.32% among the potential participants; and for low vision 0.25% versus 0.53%. The risk ratio (95% confidence interval) between the two was 0.52 (0.32-0.84) for blindness and 0.46 (0.31-0.68) for low vision. There were no differences between the proportions of potential confounders in the comparison group and those in the non-responders. CONCLUSIONS: The results suggest that population screening may reduce bilateral low vision and blindness caused by glaucoma by approximately 50%.

Caring for Older Adults With Self-Reported Vision Impairment: Findings from the National Study of Caregiving.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to examine caregiving relationships for older adults with vision impairment (VI). DESIGN: Cross-sectional study with a nationally representative sample. METHODS: Setting: the National Health and Aging Trends Study linked to the National Study of Caregiving, Year 2011. STUDY POPULATION: 1,776 family or unpaid caregivers to community-dwelling Medicare beneficiaries age ≥65 years old. OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: in the preceding month, 1) the number of hours of care provided; 2) the valued activities affected by caregiving; and 3) the odds of experiencing substantial emotional, financial, and physical difficulty related to providing care. EXPOSURE: VI was defined as a report of blindness or difficulty with distance or near vision. RESULTS: Among 1,776 caregivers, 428 caregivers spent an average ± standard error (SE) of 111 ± 9.1 hours per month assisting older adults with VI, whereas 1,348 spent an average of 72 ± 3.3 hours assisting older adults without VI. In fully adjusted negative binomial regression analyses, caregivers of older adults with VI spent 36% more hours (incident rate ratio [IRR]: 1.36; 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.15-1.60) providing care and reported having 61% more valued activities affected (IRR: 1.61; 95% CI: 1.23-2.10) than caregivers of older adults without VI. In fully adjusted logistic regression analyses, caregivers of older adults with VI had greater odds of emotional (odds ratio [OR]: 1.46; 95% CI: 1.04-2.03) but not financial (OR: 1.33; 95% CI: 0.87-2.03) or physical (OR: 1.13; 95% CI: 0.74-1.74) difficulty related to providing care than caregivers of older adults without VI. CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that caring for older adults with VI places different demands on time and emotional wellbeing than caring for older adults without VI, but no differences in financial or physical difficulties.

The Impact of COVID-19 on Individuals Across the Spectrum of Visual Impairment.

PURPOSE: TO assess perceptions and implications of COVID-19 infection across the spectrum of individuals with visually impairment (VI) and those with normal sight. DESIGN: Prospective cross-sectional comparative study. METHODS: Setting: institutional. PATIENTS: 232 patients and their caregivers. Four groups were created based on better eye characteristics: blind (best-corrected distance visual acuity [BCDVA] <3/60 or visual field <10 central degrees); severe VI (BCDVA ≤3/60 to <6/60; vertical cup-to-disc ratio ≥0.85 or neuroretinal rim width ≤0.1); moderate VI (BCDVA ≤6/60 to <6/18); or no or mild VI (controls: BCDVA ≥6/18) based on International Classification of Diseases-10 criteria and Foster and Quigley's consensus definition of glaucoma. PROCEDURE: telephone questionnaires. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: differences in perceptions and implications of COVID-19 infection across various levels of VI. Caregiver perceptions were a secondary outcome measure. RESULTS: Surveys were completed by 232 participants, with 58 participants in each VI group. Mean age was 58.9 ± 13.2 years old. Greater degrees of VI were associated with older age (P = .008) and lower education level (P = .046). Blind participants more commonly perceived vision as a risk factor for contracting COVID-19 (P = .045), were concerned about access to health care (P <.001), obtained news through word of mouth (P <.001), and less commonly wore masks (P = .003). Controls more commonly performed frequent handwashing (P = .001), were aware of telemedicine (P = .029), and had fewer concerns about social interactions (P = .020) than groups with substantial VI. All caregivers reported more frequent patient care since the COVID-19 pandemic began. CONCLUSIONS: The pandemic might have had a disproportionate impact on the visually impaired, and evidence-based assessments of COVID-19 health outcomes in this population are warranted.

Bidirectional Association between Visual Impairment and Dementia Among Older Adults in the United States Over Time.

PURPOSE: Although visual impairment (VI) has been associated with worse cognitive performance among older adults, the temporal relationship between the 2 remains subject to debate. Our objective was to investigate the longitudinal impact of VI on cognitive function and vice versa. DESIGN: Retrospective, time-to-event study. PARTICIPANTS: National Health and Aging Trends Study (NHATS) participants from 2011 to 2018 cycles. METHODS: A total of 10 676 participants aged 65 years and older were included. Cox proportional hazards regression models evaluated the impact of baseline VI on subsequent dementia and impact of baseline dementia on subsequent VI. Models were adjusted for potential confounding variables, including demographics, clinical comorbidities, and hearing and physical function limitations. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Hazard ratio (HR) for incident dementia among participants with baseline self-reported VI and HR for incident VI among participants with baseline dementia. RESULTS: Of the 10 676 participants included in the analysis, approximately 40% were aged 65-74 years, 40% were aged 75-84 years, and the remaining 20% were aged 85 years and older. The majority were female (59%), and 68% self-identified as non-Hispanic White. Among participants with normal cognitive status at baseline, subsequent dementia was observed in 1753 (16%), and among participants with normal self-reported vision at baseline, subsequent VI was reported in 2371 (22%). In adjusted regression models, participants with baseline VI had higher likelihood of developing dementia over subsequent follow-up (HR, 2.3; 95% confidence interval [CI], 2.0-2.6; P < 0.001). Likewise, participants with baseline dementia had a higher likelihood of developing self-reported VI over time (HR, 2.5; 95% CI, 2.2-2.8; P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported VI in the US Medicare population is associated with greater dementia likelihood over time, and dementia is similarly associated with greater VI likelihood over time. Associations are likely multifactorial and bidirectional and could be explained by intervening variables in the path from VI to dementia, or vice versa, or by common risk factors for pathological processes in both eyes and brain. These findings suggest the need for early identification of older adults with visual compromise and consideration of visual disability in the cognitively impaired.

Design considerations for the ideal low vision aid: insights from de-brief interviews following a real-world recording study.

PURPOSE: Low Vision Aids (LVAs) can have a transformative impact on people living with sight loss, yet the everyday requirements for developing such devices remain poorly understood and defined. This study systematically explored LVA requirements through a structured de-brief interview following a real-world self-recording study. The purpose of this work was to define the actual needs of those living with sight loss so that low vision services can better address them in future. METHODS: Thirty-two visually impaired volunteers with varying levels of previous LVA experience participated in a de-brief interview centred around a structured questionnaire. The de-brief followed a one-week real-world study during which participants used recoding spectacles to capture and narrate all situations in which they would use a 'perfect sight aid'. Content and thematic analyses were used to analyse interviews which had the purpose of contextualising these recordings and exploring requirements around psychological, functional and design factors. RESULTS: Participants reported that 46% of tasks which they had recorded were most important to them. Of these tasks, 82% were encountered frequently. Few tasks emerged as very important across many participants, the remaining tasks reflecting individual lifestyles or circumstances. Every participant used at least one LVA in their everyday life and 72% identified further coping strategies. Current LVAs identified as consistently poor were distance LVAs, with all other devices receiving mixed or only positive feedback. Around two-thirds of participants would prefer LVA use on an ad-hoc / quick access basis rather than over long periods of time, and just over half would prefer to carry it rather than wearing it all day. Lack of consistency in these responses illustrated potentially different user clusters with divergent design needs. Two-thirds of participants emphasised the desire for a discreet LVA that does not attract attention. However, since half of all participants felt self-conscious in public or in front of other people when wearing the small recording spectacles, this may not be technically achievable. CONCLUSIONS: There is a substantial opportunity for new LVAs to address visual needs that traditional devices and coping strategies cannot support. Functional, psychological and design factors require careful consideration for future LVAs to be relevant and widely adopted.

The Association between Vision Impairment and Incidence of Dementia and Cognitive Impairment: A Systematic Review and Meta-analysis.

TOPIC: The magnitude and direction of the association between vision impairment and incident dementia and cognitive impairment in prospective cohort studies was estimated by systematic review and meta-analysis. The global burden of dementia associated with vision impairment then was estimated. CLINICAL RELEVANCE: Because a predominant proportion of vision impairment is preventable or treatable, investigating its association with dementia may help to identify an important modifiable factor for the prevention of dementia. METHODS: A literature search was conducted using PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Google Scholar on September 15, 2020. Relative risks (RRs) were pooled using random-effects models and stratified analyses for subgroups representing different study characteristics. Publication bias was evaluated with funnel plots and the Egger test. The global burden of dementia associated with vision impairment was estimated based on the Global Burden of Disease Study data on the prevalence of dementia and vision impairment. RESULTS: In the meta-analysis of 14 prospective cohort studies with 6 204 827 participants and 171 888 dementia patients, the pooled RR associated with vision impairment was 1.47 (95% confidence interval [CI], 1.36-1.60). In the meta-analysis of 12 prospective cohort studies with 45 313 participants and 13 350 patients with cognitive impairment, the pooled RR was 1.35 (95% CI, 1.28-1.41). Stratified analyses showed that the associations of vision impairment with incident dementia and cognitive impairment were similar across methods of vision assessment, length of follow-up, and study quality. The global number of people with dementia associated with moderate or severe vision impairment in 2016 was 2.1 million (80% uncertainty interval, 1.0-3.3 million), which accounted for 4.7% (95% CI, 2.3%-7.5%) of the global burden of dementia. Economic inequality was significant for the burden of dementia associated with vision impairment. DISCUSSION: The overall quality of the body evidence was low because of the observational design of the studies included in the analysis. Vision impairment is associated with an increased risk of both dementia and cognitive impairment in older adults. Screening and treating vision impairment, especially in low- and middle-income countries, may help to alleviate the global burden of dementia.

Ocular Involvement in Sjögren Syndrome: Risk Factors for Severe Visual Impairment and Vision-Threatening Corneal Complications.

PURPOSE: To assess the risk factors for severe visual impairment (SVI) and corneal complications in primary and secondary Sjögren syndrome (SS). DESIGN: Retrospective case series. METHODS: Ocular data of all consecutive SS patients presenting to an eye-care network and receiving a diagnosis according to 2012 American College of Rheumatology criteria over the past 8 years were reviewed. MAIN OUTCOME MEASUREMENT: risk factors associated with SVI (best-corrected visual acuity <20/200) and vision-threatening corneal complications (ulceration or perforation) at presentation were evaluated using multivariate analysis and odds ratios (OR). RESULTS: Of the 919 patients, 285 (31%) had primary and 634 (69%) had secondary SS. The most common cause of secondary SS was rheumatoid arthritis (98.1%), followed by systemic lupus erythematosus (0.79%), psoriasis (0.79%), and scleroderma (0.6%). Among the 1,838 eyes, SVI was noted in 10%, and 2.5% had corneal complications at presentation. The presence of corneal scarring (P < .00001; OR: 3.00), corneal ulceration (P < .00001; OR: 12.96), low Schirmer values (P = .0084; OR: 0.93), cataract (P = .0036; OR: 2.4), glaucoma (P = .04; OR: 4.09), and age at diagnosis (P = .005; OR: 1.02) were independent risk factors for developing SVI. The risk factors for corneal complications were presence of scleritis (P < .0001; OR: 8.9) and a diagnosis of secondary SS (P = .009; OR: 2.94). CONCLUSIONS: In patients with SS, severity of dryness, corneal ulceration and scarring, cataract, and glaucoma are factors associated with poor visual acuity. Eyes with scleritis have a greater risk of developing vision-threatening corneal complications and therefore should be monitored closely.

Perspectives of a new sport-specific Para Shooting classification system for athletes with vision impairment.

The International Paralympic Committee (IPC) and individual sports federations have established the need to develop evidence-based systems of classification for athletes with vision impairment (VI) that may differ depending on the visual demands of each sport. As a consequence, research has been conducted that led to a new classification system for athletes competing in VI shooting. The purpose of this study was to canvas the experiences of key stakeholders (athletes, coaches and classifiers) when the new system of classification was implemented. Twenty-eight participants (17 athletes, 7 coaches and 4 classifiers) completed a questionnaire to rate their experiences of the previous and new classification systems and were interviewed to gain richer insights into their opinions. It was apparent that the changes to the classification system were not adequately communicated to the athletes in particular, and that the classifiers may require a better understanding of the principles of evidence-based classification. The new system was perceived to be significantly more specific for VI shooting and intentional misrepresentation was observed to be significantly less likely than when using the old system. This research provides valuable insights into both the positive and negative experiences of key stakeholders experiencing change in a classification system.

Epidemiology of visual impairment, sight-threatening or treatment-requiring diabetic eye disease in children and young people in the UK: findings from DECS.

BACKGROUND: We investigated the incidence and causes of sight-threatening diabetes-related eye disease in children living with diabetes in the UK, to inform the national eye screening programme and enable monitoring of trends. METHODS: We undertook a prospective active national surveillance via the British Ophthalmic Surveillance Unit. Eligible cases were children aged 18 years or younger, with type 1 or 2 diabetes, newly diagnosed between January 2015 and February 2017 with sight-threatening diabetic eye disease. RESULTS: Eight children were reported. The annual incidence of all sight-threatening diabetes-related eye disease requiring referral to an ophthalmologist among children living with diabetes (n=8) in the UK was 1.21 per 10 000 person-years (95% CI 0.52 to 2.39) and was largely attributable to cataract (n=5) 0.76 per 10 000 person-years (95% CI 0.25 to 1.77). The incidence of sight-threatening diabetic retinopathy (n=3) among those eligible for screening (12 to 18 year-olds living with diabetes) was 1.18 per 10 000 person-years (95% CI 0.24 to 3.46). No subjects eligible for certification as visually impaired or blind were reported. CONCLUSIONS: Secondary prevention of visual disability due to retinopathy is currently the sole purpose of national eye screening programmes globally. However, the rarity of treatment-requiring retinopathy in children/young people living with diabetes, alongside growing concerns about suboptimal screening uptake, merit new consideration of the utility of screening for primary prevention of diabetes-related morbidity by using the screening event and findings as a catalyst for better diabetes self-management.

Associations between adult attachment and vision-related quality of life in visually impaired individuals.

PURPOSE: An attachment theory framework approach may allow insight into how social and psychosocial factors interact to impact vision-related quality of life (QoL). In this pilot study, we investigated potential associations between adult attachment style and visual function QoL of visually impaired individuals. METHODS: We recruited 38 visually impaired individuals (15 females, 23 males; 51.8 ± 16.0 years). Visual function measures included distance and near visual acuity (VA) and contrast sensitivity. All participants completed: the 25-item National Eye Institute Visual Functioning Questionnaire-25 (NEI-VFQ 25) and the Experiences in Close Relationships-Relationships Structures questionnaire. RESULTS: Presenting conditions included inherited retinal dystrophy (n = 10), nystagmus (n = 9), glaucoma (n = 7) and other eye conditions (n = 12). There was a statistically significant negative correlation between the NEI-VFQ-25 composite score (45.5 ± 14.7) and attachment-related anxiety (r = -0.352, p = 0.033). The latter correlation still held when controlling for participants' level of vision (r = -0.352, p = 0.035). Despite the range of conditions and wide age range, these were not significantly correlated with any variable of interest in the current study. CONCLUSION: Attachment-related anxiety ought to be taken into account when managing a visually impaired individual. Attachment-based approaches could be used to improve access to support services for visually impaired individuals, as well as self-management of their condition.

The Differential Impact of Age on Vision-Related Quality of Life across the Visual Impairment Spectrum.

PURPOSE: Visual impairment (VI) can have a detrimental impact on vision-related quality of life (VRQoL), but it is still unclear how this relationship varies with age across the VI spectrum. We determined the age-stratified, cross-sectional, and longitudinal associations between VI severity and VRQoL. DESIGN: The baseline and follow-up Singapore Chinese Eye Studies (SCES-1/-2; 2009-2011 and 2015-2017). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 3068 SCES-1 participants (mean age [standard deviation {SD}]: 59.5 [9.8] years; 50.2% female) and 1919 SCES-2 participants (mean age [SD]: 56.8 [8.3] years; 49.9% female). METHODS: Visual impairment was defined as visual acuity (VA) of > 0.3 logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution (logMAR) units; VI severity as mild-moderate (logMAR scores less than the median of all individuals with VI) and severe (logMAR scores median or greater); and VI incidence as VI absence at baseline, but evident at follow-up. Age was stratified into 40 to 49 years, 50 to 64 years, and ≥65 years. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Rasch-transformed scores from the 32-item Impact of Visual Impairment (IVI) questionnaire were used to measure the "Reading," "Mobility," and "Emotional" domains of VRQoL. Multiple linear regression models determined the age-stratified associations of prevalent and incident VI with all 3 VRQoL outcomes, adjusted for potential confounders. RESULTS: Of the 807 persons with prevalent VI, 55.9% had mild-moderate and 44.1% had severe VI. Compared with no VI, age-stratified analyses showed that VRQoL decrements were significant only in the older age groups (mild-moderate VI: 6.2% and 8.1% reduction in Mobility and Reading scores in those aged ≥ 65 years; severe VI: 8.5% to 13.4% reductions in the 3 VRQoL scores in those aged ≥ 50 years). This interaction with older age became more pronounced with incident VI (N = 168), where decrements in all 3 VRQoL domains were evident only in those aged ≥65 years compared with persons without incident VI. CONCLUSIONS: Our results suggest that the VI-VRQoL associations are driven mainly by older individuals aged ≥65 years, highlighting the need for effective regular screening and early intervention modalities to prevent the presence and onset of VI, and subsequent VRQoL declines, in these individuals.

Sports participation and quality of life in individuals with visual impairment.

BACKGROUND: The positive effects of sports participation on health can be an important issue for rehabilitation of visually impaired individuals. AIMS: Our aim was to determine the relationship between sports participation and quality of life in individuals with visual impairment. METHODS: The study included 100 athletes who participated in national games for people with visual impairment and 100 subjects who did not participate in sports as the control group. The two groups were matched according to age, gender, visual acuity and visual field. The Short-Form Health Survey (SF-36) was applied for assessment of quality of life. RESULTS: All subjects had best corrected visual acuity less than 6/60 and/or visual field less than central 10 degrees in radius in the better eye. The sociodemographic characteristics of the study and control groups were similar except the level of education being higher in the athlete group and level of income higher in the control group. All of the SF-36 scores were higher among athletes compared to controls. Duration of sports activities (years) was positively correlated with Physical Functioning score. There were no significant relations between SF-36 scores and weekly sports participation time (hours). Athletes who had visual loss at an earlier age had better scores in Physical Functioning and Role Limitations due to Physical Problems. CONCLUSIONS: Sports activities had positive relationships with all domains of the quality of life in individuals with visual impairment. Thus, appropriate sports activities would increase the success of rehabilitation programs and their quality of life.

COVID-19: The regional impact of COVID-19 on the certification of vision impairment in Northern Ireland.

PURPOSE: In this paper we highlight the impact which the disruption of secondary care ophthalmic services, resulting from COVID-19, has had on Sight Impairment (SI) and Severe Sight Impairment (SSI) certification in Northern Ireland. METHODS: Regional data on SI and SSI certification in the period after the onset of the lockdown (19 March 2020-18 June 2020) were compared to the period immediately before lockdown (1 January 2020-18 March 2020) and to the same periods in 2019. Change documented was compared to post-lockdown reductions in primary and secondary ophthalmic care activity. RESULTS: In 2019, during the 3-month period (19 March 2019-18 June 2019), 115 individuals were certified as sight impaired (SI 36, SSI 75, unspecified 4). Of those certified, 65 were female, 49 male. Principal causes of certification were: Age-related macular degeneration (AMD) (N = 45), glaucoma (N = 20) and diabetic eye disease (DED) (N = 10). Mean VA, recorded from the better eye of those certified, was 0.96 LogMAR. In the 3 months following the onset of lockdown (19 March 2020-18 June 2020), only 37 individuals were certified (SI 6, SSI 31), 12 female and 25 male. AMD was the most frequent cause of sight impairment (N = 20). There were only two DED certifications and one due to glaucoma. Mean VA in the better eye of those certified was 1.15LogMAR. The numbers of CVI certifications completed following the introduction of COVID-19 lockdown fell by 68%, compared to the 2019 data. There was a significant reduction in the proportion of female certifications (p = 0.01), and in certifications due to glaucoma (p = 0.02). The proportion of those certified as SSI as opposed to SI in the period after the onset of lockdown rose from 68% in 2019 to 84% in 2020. The mean VA of those certified in the period after the onset of lockdown, when compared to those certified in the other three periods, was worse by between 0.21 and 0.19 LogMAR (p = 0.06). Reductions reflected change in overall primary and secondary ophthalmic care activity. CONCLUSIONS: It is inconceivable that COVID-19 has reduced the incidence of sight-threatening eye disease. We must therefore assume that a flood of newly presenting sight loss will present once the pandemic has passed. New presentations will include those who would normally have attended during the lockdown period, and patients who, had they accessed ophthalmic care at the appropriate time, would have been saved from severe levels of blindness. The implications of the predicted increase in demand for medical, social and low vision related services are huge.