RESUMEN
The recent 90-year anniversary of the Battle of the Somme presents an opportunity to examine the public health response to the trench diseases, new conditions which arose in the trenches of World War I. Throughout history, there have been two views of epidemic disease: the configurationist and contagionist perspectives. Most doctors responding to the trench diseases, 'contingent-contagionists', combined these two conceptions of disease. Because of the difficulty of finding a causative organism and the absence of effective treatment, the majority view became that these conditions were a product of the trench environment. Configurationism, with its emphasis on environmental and social determinants, seemed to provide the most obvious approaches for tackling the trench diseases. The diseases were effectively controlled using the tools of public health science: sanitary discipline and a battery of measures, such as improving trench construction, improving the diet, providing protective kit, regular bathing and treating lice infestation. The response demonstrates the triumph of public health science over new medical technologies. It also illustrates the importance of considering all the many determinants of health and of close surveillance, discipline and partnership working to counter ill-health. Although technology, training, doctrine and health beliefs change over time, the interaction between disease and environment remains the core challenge to public health practitioners.
Asunto(s)
Pie de Inmersión/historia , Nefritis/historia , Salud Pública/historia , Fiebre de las Trincheras/historia , Primera Guerra Mundial , Causalidad , Brotes de Enfermedades/historia , Historia del Siglo XX , Humanos , Pie de Inmersión/tratamiento farmacológico , Personal Militar/historia , Nefritis/epidemiología , Salud Pública/métodos , Fiebre de las Trincheras/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
A 6-year-old boy was admittted because of dark discoloured and painful finger tips of both hands, which had developed 2 weeks after playing with bare hands in a ditch with cold water still containing parts of ice. Trench foot of the hands was diagnosed.
Asunto(s)
Amlodipino/uso terapéutico , Mano/patología , Pie de Inmersión/diagnóstico , Vasodilatadores/uso terapéutico , Niño , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Humanos , Pie de Inmersión/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
The care of combatants with lesions caused by frostbite during the battle of Teruel, which was fought in extreme weather conditions and in temperatures as low as twenty degrees below zero, was the period of greatest medical activity and the highest rates of occupation in the military hospitals of Navarre during the civil war of 1936-1939. From November 1937 to March 1938, 375 cases of frostbite were registered in the provincial establishments, amongst which there was a predominance of cases of dry gangrene partially affecting the lower extremity, which was popularly known as "Teruel feet". Some of the medical staff, conscious of the exceptional nature of the casuistry, registered statistics, clinical cases and personal impressions of the evolution of the lesions and the effectiveness of the treatments. In treating this affectation they employed medicines, surgical techniques and novel therapeutic procedures that were not widely used in the medical milieu of the time. However, the limited duration of the problem, the inconclusive results of the treatments and the differing opinions on their effectiveness -questions that are considered in this article- restricted the subsequent medical repercussion of the experiences of frostbite developed during the wartime period in Teruel.