RESUMEN
AIMS: To characterise diabetes-related lower extremity amputations (DRLEA) and prior contact with specialist podiatrists in Northern New Zealand. METHODS: Using administrative data, DRLEA ≥35 years were identified for the Northern Region (July 2013 to June 2016). For those domiciled in Metro Auckland (July 2015 to June 2016), additional clinical data described amputation cause, diabetes-related comorbidities and podiatry contact. RESULTS: There were 862 DRLEA for 488 people, including 25% (n=214) major amputations. Age-standardised amputation rates were three times higher for males than females (41.1 vs 13.6 per 100,000 population [95% confidence interval (CI): 37.3-44.9 vs 11.6-15.6 per 100,000] respectively). Amputation rates varied by ethnicity, being 2.8 and 1.5 times higher respectively for Maori and Pacific people than non-Maori, non-Pacific people. Mortality was high at 1-, 3- and 6-months post-admission (7.9%, 12.4 % and 18.3% respectively). There was high prevalence of peripheral vascular disease (78.8%), neuropathy (75.6%), retinopathy (73.6%) and nephropathy (58%). In the 3 months prior to first DRLEA admission, 65% were not seen by specialist podiatry. CONCLUSIONS: Our study confirms higher DRLEA admission rates for Maori and males. We identified elevated rates among Pacific populations and observed suboptimal utilisation of specialist podiatry services.
Asunto(s)
Amputación Quirúrgica , Pie Diabético , Extremidad Inferior , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Pie Diabético/cirugía , Pie Diabético/etnología , Pie Diabético/epidemiología , Extremidad Inferior/cirugía , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , PrevalenciaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Ingrown toenails are a common pathology. Although a range of conservative and surgical measures are widely used for this condition, little is known about their use in practice. This study explored current practice relating to the treatment or management of ingrown toenails by podiatrists in the UK. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey (Qualtrics, Provo, UT, USA) conducted between March to June 2020 was distributed to practicing podiatrists treating or managing ingrown toenails in the UK. RESULTS: A total of 396 practicing podiatrists responded (60.1% based in the private sector). The majority (88.6%) performed nail surgery most commonly (54.3%) less than five a month. Nearly all (95%) only performed nail avulsion with or without chemical matrixectomy, universally using phenol (97.2%). Application time and number of applications varied but was most commonly applied three times (61.5%) for a total of 3 minutes (75%). Aftercare varied considerably between public and private sectors, with public sectors offering fewer follow-up appointments. CONCLUSIONS: Although there is a variation in clinical practice throughout the treatment pathway, almost all respondents offered nail avulsion with phenol matrixectomy, whereas very few provided incisional nail surgery. This data provides the most comprehensive description of how UK podiatrists conduct nail surgery for onychocryptosis.
Asunto(s)
Uñas Encarnadas , Podiatría , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Uñas Encarnadas/terapia , Uñas Encarnadas/cirugía , Estudios Transversales , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Reino Unido , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Fenol/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Femenino , Dedos del Pie , Uñas/cirugía , Encuestas de Atención de la SaludRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Burnout and occupational stress have not yet been explored within the Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ) podiatry workforce despite research suggesting an increased risk among this population. This study aimed to: (i) determine the prevalence and severity of burnout risk and occupational stress among AoNZ podiatrists; (ii) determine the factors associated with burnout risk and occupational stress among AoNZ podiatrists; and (iii) examine the relationship between burnout risk and occupational stress. METHODS: A cross-sectional online survey study was undertaken involving registered podiatrists practicing in AoNZ. Personal and professional demographic characteristics were captured. Participants also completed the Maslach Burnout Inventory (assessing three domains of emotional exhaustion, depersonalisation and personal accomplishment) and the Workplace Stress Scale as measures of burnout risk and occupational stress, respectively. Descriptive statistics, multiple regression analyses and correlation analyses were performed to address the research aims. RESULTS: Responses from 112 AoNZ podiatrists were included in the analyses. High levels of emotional exhaustion were identified in 43.8% of practitioners and were associated with physical activity status, sector of work, working in isolation and work hours (R2 = 0.304, F (8, N = 110) = 5.519, p < 0.001). High levels of depersonalisation were seen in 13.4% of practitioners and were associated with patient caseload and work hours, (R2 = 0.183, F (4, N = 108) = 5.770, p < 0.001). Low levels of personal accomplishment were observed in 8.9% of practitioners and associated with ethnicity, physical activity status and patient caseload, (R2 = 0.152, F (5, N = 106) = 3.577, p < 0.005). A total of 27.7% of practitioners exhibited an overall moderate to high risk of developing burnout. Over a fifth of practitioners exhibited stress at severe or dangerous levels. Stress levels were significantly associated with physical activity status, sector of work and management responsibility, (R2 = 0.282, F (5, N = 47) = 3.218, p = 0.15). A strong positive relationship was found between emotional exhaustion and stress (rho = 0.59, p < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: The findings reflect a moderate to severe risk of developing burnout within the workforce, with high workloads and collegial isolation constituting the primary modifiable factors driving burnout development. To maintain retention and well-being within the workforce, mitigation strategies must be implemented to address this issue.
Asunto(s)
Agotamiento Profesional , Estrés Laboral , Podiatría , Humanos , Agotamiento Profesional/epidemiología , Agotamiento Profesional/psicología , Nueva Zelanda/epidemiología , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Adulto , Estrés Laboral/epidemiología , Estrés Laboral/psicología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Diabetic foot ulcers (DFUs) are commonly contaminated with pathogenic organisms and precede most diabetes-related amputations. Antimicrobial dressings are used in the treatment of DFUs; however, recent guidelines do not support their use. There are no data describing the experience of antimicrobial dressing use among podiatrists in Aotearoa New Zealand (AoNZ). This study aimed to (i) determine which antimicrobial dressings podiatrists in AoNZ use for the management of diabetic foot ulcers; and (ii) determine what factors influence AoNZ podiatrists' use of antimicrobial dressing when managing DFUs. METHODS: An anonymous cross-sectional web-based survey was undertaken. Participants were AoNZ registered podiatrists who managed DFUs in their practice. The survey included questions relating to personal and professional demographic characteristics and DFU management and dressing practices. Descriptive statistics were computed to address the research aims. RESULTS: Responses from 43 AoNZ podiatrists were included. Participants reported both cadexomer iodine and silver dressings were the most common antimicrobial dressings used, with honey dressings being the least frequently used. The most influential factors in choosing antimicrobial dressings when managing DFUs were the presence of current infection, ulcer exudate and ability to prevent future infection. The least influential factors in choosing antimicrobial dressings when managing DFUs were patient preferences, cost of dressings and comfort of dressing/pain on removal. CONCLUSIONS: AoNZ podiatrists managing DFUs primarily use antimicrobial dressings containing cadexomer iodine or silver as active ingredients, while lower-cost options, such as honey and povidone iodine are less often used. Current recommendations highlight the lack of evidence to support positive outcomes from any particular antimicrobial dressing over another and advocate that exudate control, comfort and cost be prioritised in decision-making. As cost has been an increasing burden to our healthcare funding, clinicians and organisations may consider this before purchasing and stocking expensive dressings.
Asunto(s)
Vendajes , Pie Diabético , Podiatría , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina , Humanos , Pie Diabético/terapia , Pie Diabético/tratamiento farmacológico , Nueva Zelanda , Estudios Transversales , Vendajes/economía , Vendajes/estadística & datos numéricos , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Femenino , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Antiinfecciosos/uso terapéutico , Antiinfecciosos/economía , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , MielRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Posterior Tibial Tendon Dysfunction (PTTD) is commonly seen within musculoskeletal care. The condition's prevalence and management is poorly understood. This study aims to demonstrate current practice by multi-professional clinicians across the United Kingdom within the National Health Service. METHODS: A national (UK) cross-sectional online survey was conducted among multi-professionals who treat PTTD within their NHS practice. The survey covered assessment, management and evaluation. This was shared via social media and professional groups. RESULTS: Two hundred thirteen surveys were completed, with 153 matching the eligibility criteria. The main respondents were Physiotherapists (48%) and Podiatrists (38%). Ultrasound scanning was used most frequently when considering initial imaging (67%). Many different treatment modalities were used, but a core set of education/advice, foot orthoses, and foot specific as well as general exercise were most commonly chosen. Outcome measures routinely used were pain scale (96/269) and single leg heel raise (84/269), but patient reported outcome measures were not routinely used. The most frequent reason to escalate care was failure to manage symptoms with conservative management (106/123; 86.2%), followed by fixed deformity (10/123; 8.2%). CONCLUSIONS: This survey provides evidence on current non-surgical management for PTTD from UK NHS practice. It provides a valuable marker for clinicians to use to compare their own practice and can be used in further research as a comparator.
Asunto(s)
Tratamiento Conservador , Disfunción del Tendón Tibial Posterior , Humanos , Reino Unido/epidemiología , Disfunción del Tendón Tibial Posterior/terapia , Estudios Transversales , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Tratamiento Conservador/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Podiatría/métodos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Fisioterapeutas/estadística & datos numéricos , Ortesis del Pié/estadística & datos numéricos , Ultrasonografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modalidades de Fisioterapia/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Medicina Estatal , Terapia por Ejercicio/estadística & datos numéricos , Terapia por Ejercicio/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To assess the quality of care for patients with diabetes in Queensland hospitals, including blood glucose control, rates of hospital-acquired harm, the incidence of insulin prescription and management errors, and appropriate foot and peri-operative care. DESIGN, SETTING: Cross-sectional audit of 27 public hospitals in Queensland: four of five tertiary/quaternary referral centres, four of seven large regional or outer metropolitan hospitals, seven of 13 smaller outer metropolitan or small regional hospitals, and 12 of 88 hospitals in rural or remote locations. PARTICIPANTS: 850 adult inpatients with diabetes mellitus in medical, surgical, mental health, high dependency, or intensive care wards. RESULTS: Twenty-seven of 115 public hospitals that admit acute inpatients participated in the audit, including 4175 of 6652 eligible acute hospital beds in Queensland. A total of 1003 patients had diabetes (24%), and data were collected for 850 (85%). Their mean age was 65.9 years (SD, 15.1 years), 357 were women (42%), and their mean HbA1c level was 66 mmol/mol (SD, 26 mmol/mol). Rates of good diabetes days (appropriate monitoring, no more than one blood glucose measurement greater than 10 mmol/L, and none below 5 mmol/L) were low in patients with type 1 diabetes (22.1 per 100 patient-days) or type 2 diabetes treated with insulin (40.1 per 100 patient-days); hypoglycaemia rates were high for patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus (24.1 episodes per 100 patient-days). One or more medication errors were identified for 201 patients (32%), including insulin prescribing errors for 127 patients (39%). Four patients with type 1 diabetes experienced diabetic ketoacidosis in hospital (8%); 121 patients (14%) met the criteria for review by a specialist diabetes team but were not reviewed by any diabetes specialist (medical, nursing, allied health). CONCLUSIONS: We identified several deficits in inpatient diabetes management in Queensland, including high rates of medication error and hospital-acquired harm and low rates of appropriate glycaemic control, particularly for patients treated with insulin. These deficits require attention, and ongoing evaluation of outcomes is necessary.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/sangre , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/sangre , Pacientes Internos/estadística & datos numéricos , Auditoría Médica/métodos , Errores de Medicación/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Glucemia/análisis , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1/epidemiología , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/tratamiento farmacológico , Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 2/epidemiología , Cetoacidosis Diabética/inducido químicamente , Cetoacidosis Diabética/epidemiología , Femenino , Hemoglobina Glucada/análisis , Humanos , Hipoglucemia/inducido químicamente , Hipoglucemia/epidemiología , Enfermedad Iatrogénica/epidemiología , Insulina/efectos adversos , Insulina/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Errores de Medicación/efectos adversos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Atención Perioperativa/estadística & datos numéricos , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Pruebas en el Punto de Atención/estadística & datos numéricos , Calidad de la Atención de Salud , Queensland/epidemiología , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
Importance: Oral health care faces ongoing workforce challenges that affect patient access and outcomes. While the Medicare program provides an estimated $14.6 billion annually in graduate medical education (GME) payments to teaching hospitals, including explicit support for dental and podiatry programs, little is known about the level or distribution of this public investment in the oral health and podiatry workforce. Objective: To examine Medicare GME payments to teaching hospitals for dental and podiatry residents from 1998 to 2018, as well as the distribution of federal support among states, territories, and the District of Columbia. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cross-sectional study was conducted using data from 1252 US teaching hospitals. Data were analyzed from May through August 2020. Exposures: Dental and podiatry residency training. Main Outcomes and Measures: Medicare dental and podiatry GME payments were examined. Results: Among 1252 teaching hospitals, Medicare provided nearly $730 million in dental and podiatry GME payments in 2018. From 1998 to 2018, the number of residents supported more than doubled, increasing from 2340 residents to 4856 residents, for a 2.1-fold increase, while Medicare payments for dental and podiatry GME increased from $279â¯950â¯531 to $729â¯277â¯090, for a 2.6-fold increase. In 2018, an estimated 3504 of 4856 supported positions (72.2%) were dental. Medicare GME payments varied widely among states, territories, and the District of Columbia, with per capita payments by state, territory, and district population ranging from $0.05 in Puerto Rico to $14.24 in New York, while 6 states received no support for dental or podiatry residency programs. Conclusions and Relevance: These findings suggest that dental and podiatry GME represents a substantial public investment, and deliberate policy decisions are needed to target this nearly $730 million and growing investment to address the nation's priority oral and podiatry health needs.
Asunto(s)
Educación de Posgrado en Odontología/economía , Educación de Posgrado en Odontología/estadística & datos numéricos , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/economía , Medicare/economía , Medicare/estadística & datos numéricos , Podiatría/economía , Podiatría/educación , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Estudios Transversales , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Estados Unidos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: With growing global prevalence of diabetes mellitus, diabetes-related foot disease (DFD) is contributing significantly to disease burden. As more healthcare resources are being dedicated to the management of DFD, service design and delivery is being scrutinised. Through a national survey, this study aimed to investigate the current characteristics of services which treat patients with DFD in Australia. METHODS: An online survey was distributed to all 195 Australian members of the Australian and New Zealand Society for Vascular Surgery investigating aspects of DFD management in each member's institution. RESULTS: From the survey, 52 responses were received (26.7%). A multidisciplinary diabetes foot unit (MDFU) was available in more than half of respondent's institutions, most of which were tertiary hospitals. The common components of MDFU were identified as podiatrists, endocrinologists, vascular surgeons and infectious disease physicians. Many respondents identified vascular surgery as being the primary admitting specialty for DFD patients that require hospitalisation (33/52, 63.5%). This finding was consistent even in centres with MDFU clinics. Less than one third of MDFUs had independent admission rights. CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggests that many tertiary centres in Australia provide their diabetic foot service in a multidisciplinary environment however their composition and function remain heterogeneous. These findings provide an opportunity to evaluate current practice and, to initiate strategies aimed to improve outcomes of patients with DFD.
Asunto(s)
Pie Diabético , Hospitalización/estadística & datos numéricos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente/estadística & datos numéricos , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros de Atención Terciaria/estadística & datos numéricos , Australia , Estudios Transversales , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Minimally invasive surgery (MIS) procedures cause less trauma to the patient and might improve recovery. This study aimed to determine the efficacy and safety of condylectomy with MIS to treat interdigital corns of the lesser toes. METHODS: This prospective cohort study was conducted in seven podiatry centers. Patients with interdigital corns of the lesser toes, progressing for more than a year, with one or more recurrences in the last year following conservative treatments were eligible. The recruited patients were classified according to their treatment: conservative or surgical (condylectomy with MIS) and were compared. Patient satisfaction, pain, the clinical and functional status of the foot and the appearance of sequelae were assessed at 3 and 6 months after treatment. RESULTS: At 6 months, patients in the surgical treatment group showed no pain on pressure, which significantly differed from the conservative treatment group (p < 0.001). They also improved clinical and functional status of the foot, reaching values comparable to those of the standard population. No paresthesia, joint stiffness or instability, toe malalignment, or corn transfer to a contiguous site resulted from the surgical treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Condylectomy with MIS is effective and safe to treat interdigital corns of the lesser toes.
Asunto(s)
Callosidades/terapia , Tratamiento Conservador/métodos , Enfermedades del Pie/terapia , Osteotomía/métodos , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Anciano , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Mínimamente Invasivos/métodos , Podiatría/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Dedos del Pie/patología , Dedos del Pie/cirugía , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Australian podiatrists and podiatric surgeons who have successfully completed the requirements for endorsement for scheduled medicines, as directed by the Podiatry Board of Australia, are eligible to prescribe a limited amount of schedule 2, 3, 4 or 8 medications. Registration to become endorsed for scheduled medicines has been available to podiatrists for over 10 years, yet the uptake of training has remained low (approximately 2% of registered podiatrists/podiatry surgeons). This study aimed to explore barriers to and facilitators of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines by podiatrists. METHODS: Qualitative descriptive methodology informed this research. A purposive maximum variation sampling strategy was used to recruit 13 registered podiatrists and a podiatric surgeon who were either endorsed for scheduled medicines, in training or not endorsed. Semi-structured interviews were employed to collate the data which were analysed using thematic analysis. RESULTS: Three overarching super-ordinate themes were identified which encompassed both barriers and facilitators: (1) competence and autonomy, (2) social and workplace influences, and (3) extrinsic motivators. Within these, several prominent sub-themes emerged of importance to the participants including workplace and social networks role in modelling behaviours, identifying mentors, and access to supervised training opportunities. Stage of life and career often influenced engagement. Additionally, a lack of financial incentive, cost and time involved in training, and lack of knowledge of training requirements were influential barriers. Rural podiatrists encountered a considerable number of barriers in most of the identified areas. CONCLUSION: A multitude of barriers and facilitators exist for podiatrists as part of the endorsement for scheduled medicines. The findings suggest that a lack of engagement with endorsement for scheduled medicines training may be assisted by a more structured training process and increasing the number of podiatrists who are endorsed to increase the numbers of role models, mentors, and supervision opportunities. Recommendations are provided for approaches as means of achieving, and sustaining, these outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Habilitación Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Prescripciones de Medicamentos/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos/psicología , Podiatría/educación , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Australia , Competencia Clínica , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Investigación CualitativaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: On the 19th of January, 2020, the Chief Medical Officer of Australia issued a statement about a novel coronavirus, or SARS-CoV-2. Since this date, there have been variable jurisdictional responses, including lockdowns, and restrictions on podiatry practice. This study aimed to describe impacts of the SARS-CoV-2 pandemic on the podiatry profession in Australia. METHODS: This was a cross sectional study of Australian podiatrists using demographic data collected between 2017 and 2020, and pandemic-related question responses collected between 30th March and 31st August, 2020. Data were collected online and participants described their work settings, patient funding types, business decisions and impacts, and information sources used to guide practice decisions during this time-period. Inductive thematic analysis was used to analyse open-ended questions about their practice impact of SARS-CoV-2. RESULTS: There were 732 survey responses, with 465 Australian podiatrists or podiatric surgeons providing responses describing pandemic impact. From these responses, 223 (49% of 453) podiatrists reported no supply issues, or having adequate supplies for the foreseeable future with personal protective equipment (PPE) or consumables to support effective infection prevention and control. The most frequent responses about employment, or hours of work, impact were reported in the various categories of "business as usual" (n = 312, 67%). Participants described most frequently using the local state and territory Department of Health websites (n = 347, 75%), and the Australian Podiatry Association (n = 334, 72%) to make decisions about their business. Overarching themes which resounded through open-ended comments was that working through the pandemic was likened to a marathon, and not a sprint. Themes were: (i) commitment to do this, (ii) it's all in the plan, but not everything goes to plan, (iii) my support team must be part of getting through it, (iv) road blocks happen, and (v) nothing is easy, what's next? CONCLUSION: Podiatrists in Australia reported variable pandemic impact on their business decisions, PPE stores, and their valued sources of information. Podiatrists also described their "marathon" journey through the pandemic to date, with quotes describing their challenges and highlights. Describing these experiences should provide key learnings for future workforce challenges, should further restrictions come into place.
Asunto(s)
COVID-19/prevención & control , Control de Infecciones/tendencias , Médicos/psicología , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Anciano , Australia , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Médicos/estadística & datos numéricos , SARS-CoV-2RESUMEN
AIMS: To utilise the 2019 International Working Group on the Diabetic Foot (IWGDF) - diabetic foot infection (DFI) guidelines as an audit tool for clinical practice in patients with diabetes attending a High-Risk Foot Service. METHODS: Data from 93 consecutive patients were collected over a 19-month period in patients attending a High-Risk Foot Service. The diagnosis and management of each patient in the sample were compared against the 2019 IWGDF DFI guidelines, grouped into four categories: Diagnosis, Microbiology, Treatment of soft tissue infection, and Surgical treatment and osteomyelitis. Deficits in performance were recorded using the recommendations as a benchmark standard. RESULTS: There were 109 DFI events. Nineteen (63%) of the recommendations were met, 7 (24%) were partially met, and four (13%) recommendations were not met. Fourteen of the sample had no documented requests for full blood counts. Tissue was obtained for culture in 32 (29%) of the sample. No percutaneous bone biopsies were performed. Only 13 (28%) patients had intraoperative bone specimens sent for culture and sensitivities, with no bone specimens sent for histopathology. Modification of antibiotic therapy following available culture results was low, occurring in 12 out of 63 possible occasions (19%). The duration of antibiotic regimens in PEDIS 2 infections and osteomyelitis was greater than that recommended. CONCLUSIONS: Utilising the IWGDF DFI guidelines to benchmark clinical practice is a useful tool to identify gaps in clinical performance or service delivery and may help to improve patient care.
Asunto(s)
Benchmarking/estadística & datos numéricos , Pie Diabético/terapia , Adhesión a Directriz/estadística & datos numéricos , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Mejoramiento de la Calidad/estadística & datos numéricos , Auditoría Clínica , Bases de Datos Factuales , Pie Diabético/microbiología , Humanos , Osteomielitis/terapia , Podiatría/normas , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Infecciones de los Tejidos Blandos/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: People with diabetes are at high risk of foot complications that can lead to lower extremity amputations. National standards suggest that early assessment and management by a podiatry led multidisciplinary high-risk foot clinic (HRFC) helps to reduce complications. This review is a retrospective audit of the Central Coast Local Health District (CCLHD) podiatry department service utilisation in people with diabetes who had undergone a minor foot amputation. METHODS: All people with diabetes who had minor foot amputations in the calendar year 2017 in the CCLHD in New South Wales were identified. Podiatry occasions of service from all podiatry service clinics (e.g. general, orthoses, wound, HRFC) and hospital stays for 12 months prior to, and 12 months, post the minor foot amputation were extracted. RESULTS: Data on 74 people with diabetes who underwent 85 minor foot amputations were collected. In the 12-month period leading up to their minor foot amputation less than half, 42% (n=31), of the patients had attended any of the available podiatry service clinics within the CCLHD system. Post-amputation and discharge from hospital there was an overall rise of 26% in numbers attending all CCLHD podiatry- led clinics bringing the total to 68% (51). However, attendance at the HRFC rose by only 2% from 16% (n=12) to 18% n= (13). CONCLUSION: This study shows that there was underutilisation of Podiatry Services in the CCLHD in 2017 with some participants not meeting national treatment guidelines for foot health services. Revision of current referral pathways both prior to, during and following hospitalisation and expanding the multidisciplinary HRFC to accommodate the population by providing more accessible locations has since been undertaken to increase service access. Further provision of education to those highlighted to be at high risk has also been implemented.
Asunto(s)
Atención Ambulatoria/estadística & datos numéricos , Amputación Quirúrgica/estadística & datos numéricos , Pie Diabético/cirugía , Aceptación de la Atención de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Amputación Quirúrgica/métodos , Auditoría Clínica , Femenino , Pie/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Gales del Sur , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To describe the status of and identify factors associated with physical activity promotion by podiatrists. DESIGN: Cross sectional survey. METHOD: In 2016-17 Australian podiatrists were invited to complete an online survey. Items assessed by Likert scale included; frequency of assessing and promoting physical activity and podiatrists' intentions, attitudes, social norms, confidence, barriers, role beliefs and perceived knowledge and skills regarding the promotion of physical activity. Data were analysed using descriptive statistics, exploratory factor analysis and structural equation modelling. RESULTS: Of 316 respondents, 62% reported always/or often giving general and 39% specific physical activity advice. Attitudes to physical activity promotion were mostly positive and 83% agreed it was part of their role. Many believed they have the knowledge 62%) and skills to promote physical activity. Most podiatrists were confident to carry out basic physical activity promotion activities (83%), but fewer were confident assessing physical activity levels (54%), providing specific advice (47%), monitoring patient physical activity levels (49%) and carrying out physical activity counselling (41%). Modelling revealed intention to promote physical activity was most strongly influenced by experiential beliefs (ß=0.35, 95%CI 0.20-0.51) and instrumental beliefs (ß=0.27, 95%CI 0.15-0.40), whereas physical activity promotion was influenced by intention (ß=0.45, 95%CI 0.35-0.55) and behavioural control (ß=0.43, 95%CI 0.33-0.53). CONCLUSION: Physical activity promotion is feasible and regularly practiced in the podiatry setting, however current practice appears suboptimal. Attitudes and behavioural control appear influential in engagement and deserve consideration when designing strategies to improve delivery in podiatric practice.
Asunto(s)
Ejercicio Físico , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Promoción de la Salud/métodos , Podiatría , Adulto , Australia , Estudios Transversales , Análisis Factorial , Femenino , Encuestas de Atención de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Promoción de la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Intención , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Foot and ankle surgeries in the United States (US) are currently performed by orthopaedic surgeons or podiatrists with specialty surgical training. With the trend in healthcare now placing increased emphasis on quality and standardizing patient care, this study aimed to characterize the distribution, volume, and trends of certain foot and ankle surgeries performed in the US by both orthopaedic surgeons and podiatrists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A retrospective analysis was performed using the Marketscan Claims Database (Truven Health Analytics, Ann Arbor, Michigan) which covers most privately insured patients under the age of 65 in the USA from 2005 to 2014. We searched current procedural terminology (CPT) codes for total ankle replacement (TAR), triple arthrodesis, hallux valgus correction, pilon fracture open reduction and internal fixation (ORIF), calcaneus fracture ORIF, and ankle fracture ORIF. We recorded the timing and nature of procedures along with various features associated with the surgeon and the geographic location of the treatment facility. RESULTS: We found that the number of foot and ankle procedures performed annually is steadily increasing. Orthopaedic surgeons are the main treating surgeon for common foot and ankle traumatic conditions or complex hind foot cases like TAR. On the other hand, our study showed that podiatrists perform almost 9 out of 10 hallux valgus correction surgeries. DISCUSSION: Our study showed the trends in surgical volumes and differences between surgical podiatrists and orthopaedic surgeons and the evolution of these volumes over a ten year period and differences in surgical repertoire between orthopaedists and podiatrists.Levels of Evidence: Level IV: Case series, Clinical research.
Asunto(s)
Traumatismos del Tobillo/cirugía , Tobillo/cirugía , Bases de Datos Factuales , Traumatismos de los Pies/cirugía , Pie/cirugía , Procedimientos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Cirujanos Ortopédicos/estadística & datos numéricos , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Hallux Valgus/cirugía , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Estados Unidos/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The arrival of the novel coronavirus (SARS-CoV-2) has impacted the many aspects of modern life, especially, in the immediate term, the delivery of healthcare. CONTEXT: This commentary examines the profession of podiatry and how it has adapted and responded to the emerging crisis. It focusses on but is not exclusive to the position in the United Kingdom (UK) and the edicts and direction from the UK Government. PODIATRY ROLES DURING THE PANDEMIC: It describes the role of podiatry in the pandemic and highlights the deployment of podiatry resources to fight the pandemic beyond traditional podiatric practice. It also looks at the shift from conventional consultation to digital solutions for managing patients in an effort to achieve the goals of maintenance of foot health whilst reducing the spread of the virus. The commentary summarises the emerging data related to a possible foot related presentation of the coronavirus. CONCLUSION: The podiatry profession proved its flexibility and adaptability during the pandemic, to adjust rapidly to ensure that patients were able to access treatment to reduce risk of infection, ulceration and amputation. Dermatological presentations on the feet have been associated with Covid-19 in adolescents as is often the case in viral infections. CPD webinars to support clinicians and manage and prevent the spread of Covid-19 have been widely disseminated along with algorithms to ensure that patients that need treatment are being treated appropriately. Podiatrists have embraced remote technology to ensure that patients are correctly and safely triaged and, signposted and given appropriate self-care advice. MSK podiatrists have the ability to play an intrinsic role within the post discharge rehabilitation pathway.
Asunto(s)
Betacoronavirus/aislamiento & purificación , Infecciones por Coronavirus/epidemiología , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Neumonía Viral/epidemiología , Podiatría/organización & administración , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Tecnología Biomédica/métodos , Tecnología Biomédica/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19 , Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Infecciones por Coronavirus/virología , Atención a la Salud/tendencias , Enfermedades del Pie/prevención & control , Humanos , Pandemias/prevención & control , Docilidad , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/virología , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Conducta de Reducción del Riesgo , SARS-CoV-2 , Reino Unido/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: This is the first study to explore workforce data from the Podiatrists Board of New Zealand. The study analysed data from an online survey which New Zealand podiatrists complete as part of their application for an Annual Practising Certificate. METHODS: Survey responses between 2015 and 2019 were analysed. Data was related to work setting, employment status, work hours, location, professional affiliations, and number of graduates entering practice. Survey data was downloaded by a second party who provide data security for the Podiatrists Board of New Zealand workforce data. All data supplied for analysis were deidentified and could not be re-linked to an individual practitioner. RESULTS: In 2019 there were 430 podiatrists who held an Annual Practising Certificate. Eighty percent of podiatrists who work in New Zealand are in private practice, with 8% employed in the public health sector. Podiatrist's work is a mix of general podiatry, diabetes care and sports medicine. The majority are self-employed (40%) or business owners (19%). Approximately 40% work between 31 to 40 h per week and 46 to 50 weeks per year. The majority are female (67%) with most practising in the North Island (69%) and located in the Auckland region (33%). On average 76% of new graduates were issued an Annual Practising Certificate between 2015 and 2019. CONCLUSION: The New Zealand podiatry profession is small and growing at a slow rate, consequently there is evidence of a workforce shortage. To maintain a per-capita ratio of podiatrists approximate to Australia and the United Kingdom an additional 578 podiatrists are required in the New Zealand workforce. There are not enough new graduate practitioners entering the workforce and once practising, the majority enter private practice in the face of limited public health employment opportunities.
Asunto(s)
Fuerza Laboral en Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Práctica Privada/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Empleo/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Nueva Zelanda , Podiatría/organización & administración , Encuestas y CuestionariosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Despite potential savings to the National Health Service, the collection of data on outcomes of NHS orthotic services is patchy. Indeed, several reports into orthotic services in the UK have reported a lack of data relating to outcomes of care and highlighted the need to routinely measure outcomes to demonstrate efficacy of services. Whilst a previous study provided an overview of the use of outcome measures in orthotic practice and identified some barriers to their use, further questions emerged. Hence, this qualitative study aimed to explore orthotists' opinions and personal experiences on the influences on outcomes, how appropriate and relevant outcomes can be measured and also how barriers to the use of outcome measures can be overcome. METHODS: Following a review of the literature, an initial advisory group informed semi-structured questions. These were used to create dialogue in a focus group of 12 orthotists. Data from the focus group was transcribed verbatim and analysed using thematic analysis, creating themes and subthemes for discussion. RESULTS: The setting of realistic and agreed goals through managing expectations, compromise and patient education/information were seen as factors that could inform and improve outcomes. Barriers to the collection of outcome measures were associated with inadequate technology to manage the data, lack of time to complete them, lack of training in them and difficulties selecting appropriate outcome measures for patients with complex problems managed by different health professionals. The participants discussed ways of addressing these barriers, such as the use of 'snapshots' and delegation of data collection. CONCLUSIONS: This study has revealed that measuring outcomes is considered to be an important activity. In order to achieve good outcomes, it is important to address patient expectations, discuss and establish joint goals for care at the outset and inform and include patients in the decision-making process. The identified barriers to measuring outcomes can be overcome with the solutions revealed by these participants. Hence, this study has contributed to current knowledge which has relevance for clinical practice and may provide the theoretical basis for future research.
Asunto(s)
Personal de Salud/psicología , Aparatos Ortopédicos/ética , Podiatría/instrumentación , Actitud del Personal de Salud , Toma de Decisiones Conjunta , Femenino , Grupos Focales/métodos , Personal de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Masculino , Aparatos Ortopédicos/provisión & distribución , Evaluación de Resultado en la Atención de Salud , Educación del Paciente como Asunto/métodos , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Investigación Cualitativa , Medicina Estatal/organización & administración , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: to verify the association between knowledge and adherence to foot self-care practices performed by patients with diabetes mellitus type 2. METHODS: cross-sectional, descriptive study carried out with 197 patients in basic health units located in the Northeast region of Brazil. For data collection, we used a semi-structured questionnaire that addressed issues inherent to knowledge and Diabetes Self-Care Activities. RESULTS: we observed that patients with moderate knowledge about self-care practices were more likely to perform foot self-examination, dry the interdigital spaces, moisturize their feet with creams and oils, observe the presence of mycosis and ingrown toenail when compared to patients with insufficient knowledge. CONCLUSIONS: the patients' level of knowledge was closely related to the self-care activities carried out, which reinforces the importance of nurses working on training those on essential health care.
Asunto(s)
Diabetes Mellitus/psicología , Conocimientos, Actitudes y Práctica en Salud , Podiatría/normas , Autocuidado/normas , Cumplimiento y Adherencia al Tratamiento/psicología , Brasil , Estudios Transversales , Diabetes Mellitus/terapia , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Podiatría/estadística & datos numéricos , Autocuidado/métodos , Autocuidado/estadística & datos numéricos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Cumplimiento y Adherencia al Tratamiento/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Diabetes is the leading cause of lower limb amputation in Australia, costing the Australian health care system an estimated A$1.6 billion annually. Podiatrists are the primary foot health care provider in Australia. Research suggests that health professional attitudes can impact patient utilisation of e-health technologies, such as wearable foot monitoring devices aimed at preventing foot ulceration. The aim of this study was to explore factors that impact the intentions of Australian podiatrists to adopt smart insole foot monitoring technology. METHODS: A mixed methods explanatory sequential design was undertaken. One hundred and eleven Australian podiatrists completed an online version of the validated Unified Theory of Acceptance and Use of Technology (UTAUT) questionnaire. Multiple regression analysis was used to determine the strongest predictive model of podiatrists' behavioural intention to adopt technology. Additionally, two focus groups were conducted, and thematic analysis was performed to explore podiatrists' perceived barriers and enablers to smart insole adoption. RESULTS: One hundred and eleven Australian podiatrists completed the online UTAUT questionnaire. The majority of respondents practiced in the private sector (58.6%) and were female (50.5%), with Victoria the most common practice location (39.6%). Significant positive correlations existed between behavioural intention and six psychosocial domains including performance expectancy (r = 0.64, p < 0.001), effort expectancy (r = 0.47, p < 0.001), attitude (r = 0.55, p < 0.001), social influence (r = 0.45, p < 0.001), facilitating conditions (r = 0.36, p < 0.001), and self-efficacy (r = 0.30, p < 0.002). Multiple regression analysis determined that performance expectancy alone was most predictive of behavioural intention to adopt a smart insole into clinical practice (adjusted R2 = 42%, p < 0.001). Qualitative analyses revealed that podiatrists believed that the insole would increase patient knowledge, engagement and self-efficacy. However, concerns were raised about cost, footwear issues and the device's utility with elderly and remote populations. CONCLUSIONS: Performance expectancy was the most important psychosocial factor predicting the intentions of Australian podiatrists to adopt smart insole foot monitoring technologies. While Australian podiatrists are open to adopting smart insoles into clinical practice, evidence of the device's efficacy is a precursor to adoption. Other perceived barriers to adoption including device cost, compatibility with off-loading, footwear issues and patient age also need to be addressed prior to implementation and clinical adoption.