A unusual presentation of liver failure caused by Ibuprofen-sustained release capsules: A case report.

RATIONALE: Previous studies have shown that acetaminophen has the potential to induce hepatotoxicity in patients, rendering it a prominent drug implicated in the development of acute hepatic failure. However, there is currently no available literature reporting the impact of ibuprofen-sustained release capsules on liver failure. PATIENT CONCERNS: A 65-year-old man was presented with a 4-day history of tea-colored urine with oil avoidance, jaundiced skin, and anorexia, and impaired liver function. One ibuprofen-sustained release capsule was taken on the day before the onset of the disease due to "headache." DIAGNOSES: A diagnosis of this patient was made of liver failure due to taking ibuprofen-sustained release capsules. INTERVENTIONS: Initially, the patient discontinued the use of hepatotoxic drugs in order to prevent further exposure. Subsequently, the patient underwent a standard therapeutic regimen, which encompassed the administration of hepatoprotective agents, nutritional support drugs, correction of acid-base imbalances, and electrolyte abnormalities, as well as other relevant treatments. OUTCOMES: After 9 days of hepatoprotective and nutritional supplement therapy, the patient saw notable improvement in symptoms, reporting an absence of discomfort, subsided skin jaundice, clear urine, and liver function tests returning to a near normal range. The patient was granted permission to be discharged from the hospital while being prescribed drugs. After 2 weeks of follow-up, the patient reported an absence of discomfort and exhibited normal results in the liver function test. CONCLUSIONS: Liver failure caused by ibuprofen-sustained release capsules has not been reported. It is worth noting that conventional treatments such as suspending offending agents, and administration of hepatoprotective agents and nutritional support drugs have proven to be successful. LESSON: There is currently no known peer-reviewed literature indicating that the administration of ibuprofen-sustained release capsules leads to liver failure. When patients taking ibuprofen-sustained release capsules encounter symptoms such as anorexia, skin jaundice, lack of appetite, and nausea, it is recommended that they undertake a cardiac and liver function tests. In the event that ibuprofen-sustained release capsules induce liver injury, it is imperative to administer timely and immediate medical intervention.

Depot medroxyprogesterone acetate and breast cancer: a systematic review.

PURPOSE: Short-acting progestin-only injectables containing depot medroxyprogesterone acetate (DMPA) are a safe method of contraception. Although DMPA has been available for several decades, there is little data on its influence on the risk of breast cancer. Hence, the aim of this paper was to provide an overview of the existing studies and create clarity regarding a possible association with breast cancer. METHODS: Literature searches were executed in MEDLINE, Embase, the Cochrane Library, ClinicalTrials.gov and ICTRP. Search terms were related to DMPA and breast cancer. After elimination of duplicates, 3'850 studies were identified and assessed according to inclusion and exclusion criteria. Finally, ten studies were selected and included in this review. RESULTS: All the selected papers were case-control-studies, except for one pooled analysis and one study comparing observed and expected number of cancer cases. Most of the included studies found no overall elevated breast cancer incidence in DMPA users, only one study found a slightly increased risk and two studies concluded with a significant increase for the overall breast cancer risk. CONCLUSION: There is little evidence that DMPA may increase the overall risk for breast cancer. However, the incidence of breast cancer is possibly increased in current and more recent users, especially in women younger than 35 years. Long-term use did not result in any risk increase. Nevertheless, further studies will be necessary to confirm these findings and weigh up the individual risks and benefits of this contraceptive method.

A case of pulmonary edema due to guanfacine intoxication with measurement of serum guanfacine concentrations.

Guanfacine hydrochloride extended-release (GXR) is used to treat attention deficit hyperactivity disorder. It is a selective α2A-adrenorecepor agonist that was reported to cause QT prolongation and hypotension in the event of overdosing. We report the case of a 17-year-old man who took 226 tablets of GXR 3 mg for attempted suicide. He was found complaining of dyspnea, and emergency medical services were called. When the patient was transferred to our hospital, his Glasgow coma scale was 12 (E4V3M5). He was agitated and hypoxemic. He was intubated for invasive mechanical ventilation under sedation. His chest X-ray and computed tomography scan showed pulmonary edema. Transthoracic echocardiography showed markedly reduced cardiac function. His serum guanfacine concentration peaked on day 3 after admission. His pulmonary edema improved quickly after a decrease in serum guanfacine concentration, but cardiac decompensation persisted for about 1 month. This case reveals that the decline in cardiac function after guanfacine intoxication is prolonged even after its serum concentration has decreased.

Postpartum Extended-Release Buprenorphine Tissue Necrosis.

BACKGROUND: Extended-release buprenorphine (XRB) may improve medication for opioid use disorder continuation among postpartum individuals. However, obstetric clinicians have relatively little experience with XRB. We describe two cases of XRB-related tissue necrosis in postpartum individuals to highlight recommended injection technique and management strategies for this rare complication. CASES: One patient developed tissue necrosis after her initial injection. Her wound was expectantly managed. Another patient on long-term XRB developed tissue necrosis within 1 day of injection. General surgery excised the depot. Both instances were attributed to injection of XRB intradermally rather than subcutaneously. Both patients continued monthly XRB without recurrence, suggesting that this complication is not an allergy. CONCLUSION: Clinicians should be able to prevent, recognize, and manage tissue necrosis, a rare complication of XRB injection.

Adverse Events During Dosing of Delayed-release/Extended-release Methylphenidate: Learnings From the Open-label Phase of a Registration Trial and a Real-world Postmarketing Surveillance Program.

PURPOSE: Delayed-release/extended-release methylphenidate (DR/ER-MPH) (formerly HLD200) is an evening-dosed agent used for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder. Postmarketing surveillance data from approximately 74,000 patients exposed to DR/ER-MPH (up to June 17, 2022) were reported and compared with the open-label, treatment-optimization phase of a Phase III clinical trial to derive possible learnings on how to approach adverse events (AEs) that emerge during dose titration. METHODS: An analysis of AEs spontaneously reported to Ironshore in postmarketing surveillance included, where available, age, dose, timing, and discontinuations. Data were summarized using descriptive statistics. FINDINGS: A total of 395 children, adolescents, and adults reported 601 AEs in postmarketing surveillance. Five AEs were classified as serious. AEs preceded drug use discontinuation in 172 patients. Many AEs occurred early (52% were reported within 30 days) and at lower doses (54% were reported at 20 to 40 mg), similar to the trial data. Reported AEs included those similar in type but orders of magnitude lower in number than those from the clinical trial. IMPLICATIONS: No new safety concerns were revealed in this real-world setting compared with the safety profile identified in DR/ER-MPH trial data. In real-world practices, clinicians tended to discontinue DR/ER-MPH treatment after AE onset, whereas trial investigators continued to optimize treatment and found that AEs were generally tolerable, suggesting that health care practitioners may consider developing strategies to manage tolerability issues with DR/ER-MPH treatment on AE emergence rather than immediately discontinuing use of the drug to provide optimal therapeutic benefit. CLINICALTRIALS: gov identifier: NCT02493777.

Efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide and controlled-release carbamazepine monotherapy in patients with newly diagnosed temporal lobe epilepsy: Post hoc analysis of a randomized, double-blind trial.

PURPOSE: Temporal lobe epilepsy (TLE) is often associated with drug-resistant seizures. We evaluated the efficacy and tolerability of lacosamide (LCM) versus controlled-release carbamazepine (CBZ-CR) monotherapy in adults with newly diagnosed TLE. METHODS: Exploratory post hoc analysis of patients with temporal focus of localization (indicated as the only localization focus) in a double-blind, noninferiority, phase 3 trial (SP0993; NCT01243177) in patients aged ≥ 16 years with newly diagnosed epilepsy randomized 1:1 to LCM or CBZ-CR monotherapy. RESULTS: Of 886 treated patients in this trial, temporal lobe focus of localization (TLE) was reported as the single focus for 287 (32.4%) patients (LCM 134, CBZ-CR 153). A similar proportion of patients with TLE on LCM (82  [61.2%]) and CBZ-CR (99  [64.7%]) completed the trial. Kaplan-Meier estimates for 6- and 12-month seizure freedom at the last evaluated dose level (stratified by number of seizures in the 3 months before screening  [≤2 or >2 seizures]) were similar with LCM and CBZ-CR (6 months overall: 88.7% and 89.7%; 12 months overall: 78.3% and 81.7%). Treatment-emergent adverse events (TEAEs) were reported by fewer patients on LCM (73.9%) than CBZ-CR (81.0%). Drug-related TEAEs (assessed by the investigator) were reported in 41.8% of patients on LCM and 52.3% of patients on CBZ-CR; 11.2% of patients on LCM and 15.0% on CBZ-CR discontinued due to TEAEs. CONCLUSION: Lacosamide was efficacious and generally well tolerated as monotherapy in patients with TLE with efficacy outcomes comparable with CBZ-CR, and fewer patients on LCM reported any TEAEs, drug-related TEAEs, or discontinued due to TEAEs.

Real-World Safety and Effectiveness of Controlled-Release Cilostazol in Patients with Symptomatic Peripheral Artery Disease.

BACKGROUND: Cilostazol is the only first-line medication for treating intermittent claudication, and the controlled-release (CR) formulation is associated with a lower prevalence of adverse events (AEs). OBJECTIVE: The objective of the study was to assess the safety and effectiveness of cilostazol CR in patients with symptomatic peripheral artery disease (PAD). METHODS: In this multicentre (113 sites), open-label, prospective observational study, we evaluated the real-world safety and effectiveness of cilostazol CR 200 mg once daily in patients with symptomatic PAD treated in routine clinical settings. The primary endpoint was the incidence and severity of AEs, and their causal relationship with cilostazol CR. The secondary endpoint was the effectiveness of the drug, as assessed by each patient's physician, for improving intermittent claudication. RESULTS: Among 2063 participants who received cilostazol CR for a mean duration of 88.6 days, 99 (4.80 %) experienced adverse drug reactions (ADRs), although no unexpected adverse reactions were observed. There was no significant difference in the incidence of ADRs according to patient demographics and comorbidities (all p > 0.05). The treatment was 'effective' in 1600 patients (78.93 %), although effectiveness significantly differed according to the patients' sex and the presence of comorbidities, including diabetes mellitus, hypertension, and coronary artery disease (all p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated the tolerability and effectiveness of cilostazol CR treatment in patients with symptomatic PAD.

A pharmacokinetic study of extended-release buprenorphine in cynomolgus monkeys (Macaca fasicularis).

BACKGROUND: A novel buprenorphine (BUP) extended-release formulation (BUP-XR) produced as a lipid-encapsulated, low viscosity BUP suspension for subcutaneous (SC) injection to control pain was evaluated for pharmacokinetics and safety in four adult male cynomolgus monkeys. METHODS: Each animal was given 0.2 mg/kg reformulated BUP-XR SC. Clinical observations were made during the course of the study. Blood samples were obtained from each animal before BUP-XR administration, 6, 24, 48, 72, and 96 h post-BUP-XR injection. Plasma levels of buprenorphine were analyzed using HPLC-MS/MS. The PK values calculated included peak plasma concentration of the BUP analyte, time to peak plasma concentration, plasma half-life, area under the plasma concentration-time curve, clearance, apparent volume of distribution, and elimination rate constant (Cmax , Tmax , T½ , AUC0-t , CL, Vd, and Ke, respectively). RESULTS: Observable adverse clinical signs were not detected. BUP concentration peaked from 6 to 48 h, then declined in a linear fashion. Quantifiable plasma BUP was measured in all monkeys at all time points. Results indicate that a single BUP-XR dose at 0.2 mg/kg can reliably provide plasma levels of BUP reported in the literature to be therapeutically relevant for up to 96 h. CONCLUSIONS: Because of the lack of any clinical observations or adverse effects at the injection site or absence of observable abnormal behaviors, it may be concluded that the use of BUP-XR is safe and efficacious in this species of non-human primate at the dose regimen described in this study for up to 96 h post-administration.

Post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome after treatment with olanzapine depot.

Treatment with olanzapine depot is associated with a rare but potentially adverse reaction, namely post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome (PDSS), characterized by delirium and/or sedation. This is a case report of a 38-year-old male patient who developed symptoms consistent with PDSS shortly after receiving intramuscular injection of olanzapine depot. Clinicians should be aware of PDSS and observe patients for three hours after receiving the injection, measuring vitals and referring to medical care if necessary.

Pharmacokinetics and Bioequivalence of 2 Nifedipine Controlled-Release Tablets: A Randomized, Single-Dose, 2-Period Crossover Study in Healthy Chinese Volunteers Under Fasting and Fed Conditions.

The aim of this study was to evaluate the bioequivalence of generic nifedipine controlled-release tablet compared to branded product under fasting and fed conditions. A randomized, single-dose, 2-period, crossover study with a 7-day washout period was performed in 84 healthy Chinese volunteers (fasting cohort, n = 42; fed cohort, n = 42). In each study period, volunteers were assigned to receive a single oral dose of the generic or reference product (30 mg). Blood samples were collected before dosing and up to 72 hours after administration. The plasma concentration of nifedipine was determined by a validated liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry method. Pharmacokinetic parameters were obtained using a noncompartmental model and log-transformed pharmacokinetic parameters (maximum plasma concentration, area under the plasma concentration-time curve (AUC) from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, AUC from time 0 to infinity) were used to evaluate bioequivalence. The results showed that the 90% confidence interval for the geometric mean ratio of pharmacokinetic parameters of the test and reference products ranged from 80.0% to 125.0% in both the fasting and fed cohorts, meeting the criteria for bioequivalence. No serious adverse events were reported throughout the study and no adverse events led to withdrawal from the study. Food effects were found in both the test and reference products, with mean maximum plasma concentration, AUC from time 0 to the last measurable concentration, and AUC from time 0 to infinity increased by 23.7%, 20.7%, and 20.5%, respectively, for the test product and 35.2%, 13.4%, and 14.7% for the reference product after a high-fat and high-calorie breakfast.

Intramuscular, extended-release naltrexone inadvertently administered in the deltoid muscle: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Extended-release, intramuscular (IM) naltrexone can be an effective and convenient medication option for alcohol use disorder. We sought to assess the clinical impact of an alternate, if inadvertent, administration of IM naltrexone in the deltoid muscle instead of the recommended gluteal muscle. CASE SUMMARY: IM naltrexone was prescribed to a hospitalized 28-year-old man with severe alcohol use disorder as part of an inpatient clinical trial. A nurse unfamiliar with naltrexone administration mistakenly administered the drug to the deltoid instead of the gluteal muscle recommended by the manufacturer. Despite concerns that injection of the large-volume suspension to the smaller muscle would potentially contribute to increased pain and higher chance of adverse events owing to faster medication absorption, the patient experienced only mild discomfort to the deltoid region, without other adverse events on immediate physical and laboratory examinations. The patient later denied additional adverse events in the period after hospitalization, but he did not endorse any anti-craving effect of the medication, resuming drinking alcohol quickly following initial discharge. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS: This case represents a unique procedural challenge of administering a medication in the inpatient setting that is typically given in the outpatient setting. Inpatient staff members frequently rotate and may be relatively unfamiliar with IM naltrexone, so handling should be limited to personnel who have received focused training on its administration. Fortunately, in this case deltoid administration of naltrexone was well-tolerated and even deemed quite "acceptable" to the patient. Clinically, the medication was insufficiently effective, but biopsychosocial context may have made his AUD especially refractory. More research is needed to fully establish whether naltrexone given via deltoid muscle injection has comparable safety and efficacy to gluteal muscle administration.

The pharmacokinetics of single oral dose extended-release topiramate and adverse effects after multi-dose administration in healthy cats.

Current treatment options for feline epilepsy are limited to medications that require administration of multiple doses per day or administration of a capsule or large tablet. Expanding the current treatment options could improve patient and owner compliance and optimize seizure control. Topiramate has been used sparingly in veterinary medicine, and limited pharmacokinetic studies have focused on immediate release formulations in dogs. If effective and safe, topiramate extended-release (XR) could broaden the current treatment options for feline epilepsy. The aims of this two-phase study were to establish single-dose pharmacokinetics for topiramate XR in cats, identify a dosing regimen that maintains steady-state plasma drug concentrations within a reference range extrapolated from human medicine (5-20 µg/mL), and evaluate the safety of topiramate XR in cats following multidose administration. Topiramate XR administered orally at 10 mg/kg once daily for 30 days was sufficient to achieve the desired concentrations in all cats. While no clinically apparent adverse effects were observed, four out of eight cats developed subclinical anemia, calling into question the safety of topiramate XR with chronic administration. Further studies are necessary to better understand the potential adverse effects and overall efficacy of topiramate XR for the treatment of feline epilepsy.

No pain, no strain: Targin® mitigates pain and constipation following spinal cord injury.

BACKGROUND: Opioids effectively reduce chronic pain, but present significant side effects including opioid-induced constipation. Oxycodone/naloxone decreases pain and constipation in cancer patients, however its effect on spinal cord injury population remains understudied. METHODS: We assessed whether oxycodone/naloxone reduces pain, constipation, and severity of autonomic dysreflexia in an individual with spinal cord injury. A 55-year-old male with C5 lesion presented with chief complaint of chronic pain received 5/2.5 mg and 20/10 mg oxycodone/naloxone for 6 and 2 weeks, respectively. RESULTS: Oxycodone/naloxone improved pain, bowel function, and autonomic dysreflexia severity. INTERPRETATION: Oxycodone/naloxone was effective in managing chronic pain and constipation in the studied case.

Long-acting injectable paliperidone palmitate induced severe cutaneous allergic reaction in a patient with first episode delusional disorder tolerating oral paliperidone regimen: a case report.

BACKGROUND: Paliperidone is a second-generation antipsychotic agent that is effective in the treatment of schizophrenia and schizoaffective disorder as well as an adjunct to mood stabilizers and antidepressants for bipolar and depressive disorders. Paliperidone is available in both oral and injection forms. Here we report an unexpected case of cutaneous allergic reaction induced by paliperidone long-acting injection (LAI) following oral tolerance. CASE PRESENTATION: A 55-year-old man with first episode delusional disorder was treated with paliperidone tablets with tolerance. On day seven he received the paliperidone LAI and developed an allergic reaction in minutes including flushing of the face, widespread urticaria with mild airway constriction. The allergic symptoms were relived following the administration of antihistamine within several minutes. CONCLUSION: The allergic reaction that occurred post administration of the paliperidone LAI but not the oral tablets suggest it is likely due to the excipients in the formulation of the LAI rather than paliperidone itself. This case highlights the necessity of monitoring allergic reactions in psychiatric patients when converting from oral to LAI format of paliperidone.

Post-Injection Delirium/Sedation Syndrome: A Case Report and 2-Year Follow-Up.

BACKGROUND Long-acting injectable (LAI) antipsychotics are one of the forms of therapy for severe mental illness. Post-injection delirium/sedation syndrome (PDSS) is a very rare but serious adverse effect following the application of an olanzapine in a long-acting form. The most common symptoms of the syndrome are sedation, delirium, dysarthria, ataxia, extrapyramidal symptoms, agitation, dizziness, or seizure. The predispositions, prevention, and exact mechanism of PDSS remain unclear. CASE REPORT We present a case report of a 30-year-old male patient experiencing PDSS, including the main symptoms of PDSS, diagnostic methods, olanzapine plasma concentrations, therapeutic process, and outcome. We then include a follow-up of the patient 2.5 years later. The patient did not have any long-term damage, had no disabilities, and no post-traumatic stress disorder following the event. We include information about his current medications, further use of LAI antipsychotics, and update about his everyday life. CONCLUSIONS PDSS is a life-threatening condition clinicians must be aware of, and the easiest precaution is a 3-h observation after the application of an injection. Because the predispositions, prevention, and exact mechanism of PDSS remains unclear, it is very important to report the rare cases of PDSS and conduct further research for the safety of our patients. The follow-up of the patient showed that the patient is doing well, he has no post-traumatic stress disorder following the event, and he did continue to use LAI antipsychotic medication.

Bioequivalence and safety evaluation of two preparations of metformin hydrochloride sustained-release tablets (Boke® and Glucophage®-XR) in healthy Chinese volunteers: a randomized phase I clinical trial.

BACKGROUND: As per the National Medical Products Administration (NMPA) requirements, the quality and efficacy of generic drugs must be consistent with those of the innovator drug. We aimed to evaluate the bioequivalence and safety of generic metformin hydrochloride sustained-release (MH-SR) tablets (Boke®) developed by Beijing Wanhui Double-crane Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., China and the innovator product metformin hydrochloride extended-release tablets (Glucophage®-XR) manufactured by Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, New York, NY, in healthy Chinese volunteers. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We performed a bioequivalence and safety assessment of MH-SR (500 mg/tablet) and Glucophage®-XR (500 mg/tablet) tablets in a randomized, open-label, two-period, two-sequence crossover, single-dose oral study in 48 healthy Chinese adult participants under fasting conditions (Chinese Clinical Trial Registration No. CTR20171306). The washout period was seven days. Bioequivalence (80.00-125.00%) was assessed using adjusted geometric mean ratios (GMRs) and two-sided 90% confidence intervals (CIs) of the area under the curve (AUC) and maximum concentration (Cmax) for each component. RESULTS: The 90% CIs of the test/reference preparation for key pharmacokinetic parameters were 97.36-108.30% for AUC0→t, 97.26-108.09% for AUC0→∞ and 96.76-111.37% for Cmax. No severe adverse events (AEs) were observed. However, 38 adverse drug reactions (ADRs) occurred, including metabolic or nutritional conditions (n = 8), infections (n = 2), gastrointestinal conditions (n = 10) and abnormal inspection (n = 18). No significant difference was observed between MH-SR (23 ADRs, 10 participants) and Glucophage®-XR (15 ADRs, 12 participants) (p = .500). Bioequivalence was concluded since the 90% CIs of the main pharmacokinetic parameters were within the equivalence interval (80.00-125.00%). CONCLUSIONS: MH-SR (500 mg/tablet) and Glucophage®-XR (500 mg/tablet) were found to be bioequivalent and safe under fasting conditions in healthy Chinese participants. Thus, the market demand for MH-SR tablets (500 mg/tablet) can be met using the generic alternative.KEY MESSAGESGeneric MH-SR tablets (500 mg, Beijing Wanhui Double-crane Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Beijing, China) and innovator MH-SR tablets (Glucophage®-XR, 500 mg, Bristol-Myers Squibb Company, New York, NY, USA) were bioequivalent and safe in healthy Chinese volunteers under single-dose administration and fasting conditions.The main goal of this study is to support an increase in the supply of MH-SR tablets in China by proving the efficacy and safety of a generic alternative.Although no sugar was administered in the BE trial of the MH-SR tablets under fasting conditions, no hypoglycaemic event occurred. The method used in this study is expected to serve as a reference for BE studies of different MH-SR formulations.

Comparison of Extrapyramidal Symptoms Among Outpatients With Schizophrenia on Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics.

BACKGROUND: Extrapyramidal symptoms (EPSs) are adverse effects of antipsychotics. Different risks of EPSs have been attributed to the 3 classes of antipsychotics. This study aimed to assess EPS in a clinical sample of schizophrenia patients who are on LAI and compare the severity of EPSs among the following 3 antipsychotic groups: (1) partial agonist, (2) second-generation antipsychotics, and (3) first-generation antipsychotics. METHODS: Ninety-two patients were recruited from the Schizophrenia Program Injection Clinic. Using the Extrapyramidal Symptom Rating Scale (ESRS), severity of EPS was assessed and information regarding factors associated with risk of EPS, including coprescriptions, comorbidities, and demographics, was obtained from medical charts. Group differences in ESRS scores and subscores were analyzed using 1-way analyses of variances. RESULTS: Among the 3 groups, there was no significant difference in total ESRS scores and subscores. Risperidone was associated with higher ESRS scores when compared with paliperidone, aripiprazole, and flupenthixol. Doses above maximum were commonly used in the paliperidone group, and there was no significant difference in total ESRS scores between the low, average, or above-maximum doses of paliperidone. CONCLUSIONS: Our results demonstrated a comparative risk of EPS across all 3 antipsychotic classes. Risperidone was associated with more EPS compared with other medications. A higher threshold for the "maximum dose" of paliperidone could be considered and higher doses used with the same cautions as low-average doses.

Tardive Dyskinesia and Long-Acting Injectable Antipsychotics: Analyses Based on a Spontaneous Reporting System Database in Japan.

Objective: This study compared the reporting frequency of tardive dyskinesia (TD) between long-acting injectable antipsychotics (LAI-APs) and the equivalent oral antipsychotics (O-APs), LAI first-generation antipsychotics (LAI-FGAs) and LAI second-generation antipsychotics (LAI-SGAs), and individual LAI-APs.Methods: The Japanese Adverse Drug Event Report was used in this study, and data were obtained from April 2004 to February 2021. Patients who received LAI-APs available in Japan (LAI haloperidol, LAI fluphenazine, LAI aripiprazole, LAI risperidone, and LAI paliperidone) or the equivalent O-APs were included in this study. We calculated the adjusted reporting odds ratios (aRORs) to compare the reporting frequency of TD.Results: A total of 8,425 patients were included in the study. TD was reported significantly less frequently with LAI paliperidone than with oral paliperidone (aROR [95% confidence interval (CI)] = 0.13 [0.05-0.36]). Other LAI-APs were associated with a numerically lower reporting frequency of TD than the equivalent oral SGAs. The reporting frequency of TD associated with LAI-SGAs was significantly lower than that of LAI-FGAs (aROR [95% CI] = 0.18 [0.08-0.43]). All LAI-SGAs were significantly associated with a lower reporting frequency of TD than that of LAI fluphenazine (aROR [95% CI]: LAI aripiprazole, 0.11 [0.04-0.35]; LAI risperidone, 0.09 [0.03-0.32]; LAI paliperidone, 0.02 [0.005-0.09]). and LAI haloperidol, 8.58 [1.85-39.72]). LAI fluphenazine was significantly associated with a higher reporting frequency of TD than LAI haloperidol (aROR [95% CI] = 8.58 [1.85-39.72]). The reporting frequency of TD associated with LAI paliperidone was significantly lower than that with LAI aripiprazole (aROR [95% CI] = 0.18 [0.05-0.73]).Conclusions: Compared to O-APs, LAI-APs, particularly LAI-SGAs, may be associated with a lower risk of TD.

Randomized, Double-Blind, Placebo-Controlled, Fixed-Dose Study to Evaluate the Efficacy and Safety of Amphetamine Extended-Release Tablets in Adults With Attention-Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder.

Objective: To evaluate the efficacy and safety of amphetamine extended-release tablets (AMPH ER TAB) in adults with attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD).Methods: In a 5-week forced-dose titration phase, subjects were randomized to either oral double-blind AMPH ER TAB 5-mg starting dose or matching placebo, once daily in the morning. Safety and efficacy assessments were completed weekly. After visit 3, subjects received 20 mg for 14 ± 3 days before visit 5. At visit 5, efficacy assessments included the administration of serial Permanent Product Measure of Performance (PERMP) tests predose and at 0.5, 1, 2, 4, 8, 10, 12, 13, and 14 hours postdose. The primary efficacy endpoint was the mean PERMP Total score (PERMP-T) across postdose time points during the visit 5 serial PERMPs. Safety was monitored by adverse events (AEs) assessed at each visit, Columbia Suicide Severity Rating Scale (C-SSRS), vital signs, weight, physical examination, and assessment of sleep, appetite, mood, and psychotic AEs. The study was conducted from February 2019 to October 2019.Results: Of 130 randomized subjects, 127 were in the intent-to-treat (ITT) population and 91 completed the study. The mean PERMP-T across all postdose time points at visit 5 was statistically significantly higher in the AMPH ER TAB group than in the placebo group (302.8 vs 279.6; P = .0043). Numerical differences favoring AMPH ER TAB were seen at all time points, with statistically significant improvements in the AMPH ER TAB group at 30 minutes and 1, 2, 4, 8, and 13 hours postdose, although the 10-, 12-, and 14-hour time points were not significant. Common AEs included decreased appetite, insomnia, and dry mouth. The majority of treatment-emergent AEs were mild to moderate in severity, and no serious AEs, as defined by the US Food and Drug Administration, were reported.Conclusions: AMPH ER TAB demonstrated efficacy in treatment of symptoms of ADHD in adults, with an anticipated safety profile.Trial Registration: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03834766.