Term Breech Presentation and Timing of Delivery.

BACKGROUND: Breech presentation is a major indication for cesarean delivery (CD); however, the ideal timing of breech CD is debatable. OBJECTIVES: To study the influence of gestational age at the time of CD in breech presentation on maternal and fetal complications. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study including term singleton CDs of breech presentation between February 2020 and January 2022 at a tertiary medical center. Maternal and neonatal outcomes were compared by gestational age at the time of CD. Logistic regression models were constructed to adjust for confounders. RESULTS: The study population included 468 CDs, 227 (48.5%) were at 37 + 0 to 38 + 6 weeks, 168 (36%) were at 39 + 0 to 39 + 6 weeks (comparison group), and 73 (15.5%) were at ≥ 40 weeks at the time of delivery. The rate of emergent CDs was significantly higher in both study groups. The composite of maternal adverse outcomes was also significantly higher at ≥ 40 weeks of gestation. Using logistic regression model, associations remained significant. The adjusted odds ratios (OR) for emergent CDs at 37 + 0 to 38 + 6 weeks and at ≥ 40 weeks were 1.65 (P = 0.018) and 2.407 (P = 0.004), respectively. Adjusted OR for maternal adverse outcomes at ≥ 40 weeks was 2.094 (P = 0.018). Higher rates of emergent CDs in both study groups compared to the comparison group was noted. A composite of maternal adverse outcomes was significantly higher at ≥ 40 weeks of gestation. This association remained significant after controlling for potential confounders. CONCLUSIONS: CDs at 39 + 0 to 39 + 6 weeks are associated with better maternal outcomes and lower rates of emergent CDs.

Intrapartum Ultrasound Guidance to Make Safer Any Obstetric Intervention: Fetal Head Rotation, Assisted Vaginal Birth, Breech Delivery of the Second Twin.

Intrapartum ultrasound (US) is more reliable than clinical assessment in determining parameters of crucial importance to optimize the management of labor including the position and station of the presenting part. Evidence from the literature supports the role of intrapartum US in predicting the outcome of labor in women diagnosed with slow progress during the first and second stage of labor, and randomized data have demonstrated that transabdominal US is far more accurate than digital examination in assessing fetal position before performing an instrumental delivery. Intrapartum US has also been shown to outperform the clinical skills in predicting the outcome and improving the technique of instrumental vaginal delivery. On this basis, some guidelines recommend intrapartum US to ascertain occiput position before performing an instrumental delivery. Manual rotation of occiput posterior position (MROP) and assisted breech delivery of the second twin are other obstetric interventions that can be performed during the second stage of labor with the support of intrapartum US. In this review article we summarize the existing evidence on the role of intrapartum US in assisting different types of obstetric intervention with the aim to improve their safety.

If the first child is breech, overall outcomes for families with two children are similar regardless of the mode of the first birth.

Cesarean section for breech presentation is often recommended. However, cesarean section affects future reproduction. The aim of this study was to assess the effect of mode of the first birth in breech on outcomes of the second birth and the two births together. This is a register-based nationwide cohort study including 23 062 women with a first singleton birth in breech ≥ 34 gestational weeks and a subsequent singleton birth in Sweden 2000-2019. Exposure was mode of first delivery. Main maternal outcome was a composite of fourth-degree perineal injury, postpartum hemorrhage requiring blood transfusion, hysterectomy, or death. Main infant outcome was a composite of stillbirth, extremely preterm birth (< 28 weeks), moderate to severe hypoxic ischemic encephalopathy, therapeutic hypothermia, or death. Outcomes were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. In the first birth, the infant composite outcome affected < 1% in both groups but the risk was higher in the vaginal breech group (13/1525), compared with the breech CS group (27/21 537), aOR 7.06, 95% CI 2.91-17.1. In the second birth, the infant composite outcome affected < 1% in both groups but the risk was lower for the first vaginal breech group (3/1525) compared with the first breech CS group (152/21 537), aOR 0.26, 95% CI 0.08-0.84. There was no significant difference between the groups in risk of composite infant outcome in the two births assessed together, or in risk of composite maternal outcome. In total, the chance of a two-children family without maternal or infant severe adverse composite outcome was high and similar regardless mode of the breech first birth.

Outcomes in term breech birth according to intended mode of delivery-A Swedish prospective single-center experience of a dedicated breech birth team.

INTRODUCTION: The appropriate mode of delivery for breech babies is a topic of ongoing debate. After the publication of the Term Breech Trial in 2000, the proportion of breech babies delivered vaginally in Sweden rapidly dropped to 7% from 26%. In 2015, international guidelines changed to once again recommend offering vaginal breech deliveries in select cases. In 2017, a Swedish hospital established a dedicated Breech Team to provide safe vaginal breech deliveries according to the new guidelines. The aim of this study is to compare neonatal morbidity in the group planned for cesarean breech delivery with the group planned for vaginal breech delivery treated in accordance with the new guidelines. The study adds to the literature by providing insights into the consequences of reintroducing vaginal breech births in a high-resource health-care setting. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A prospective observational study was conducted at Södersjukhuset's maternity ward with 1067 women who gave birth to a single breech fetus at term. Outcomes were compared between the planned vaginal and planned cesarean delivery groups using intention-to-treat analysis and multivariate analysis to control for confounders. RESULTS: Out of the 1067 women, 78.9% were planned for cesarean delivery and 21.1% were planned for vaginal delivery. The planned vaginal group had a significantly greater risk for neonatal morbidity compared to the planned cesarean group (3.1% vs. 0.7%; OR 4.44, 95% CI 1.48-13.34). The risk difference remained significant after controlling for confounders. CONCLUSIONS: Planned vaginal breech delivery was associated with an increased risk of neonatal mortality and short-term morbidity compared to planned cesarean breech delivery in accordance with the new guidelines. The potential risks and benefits of planned vaginal breech delivery should be carefully weighed against those of planned cesarean delivery.

Impact of a simulator-based training program on the success rate of external cephalic version.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the success and complication rates of external cephalic version before and after the implementation of a simulator-based training program at a tertiary care university centre with a dedicated external cephalic version team. STUDY DESIGN: In this single-center intervention study, the success rate and the complication rates of external cephalic version in the two years before the implementation of a simulation-based training program for all specialists and residents, were compared with the two years following the event. T- student, Mann-Whitney, and Chi-square tests were used. All data were extracted from the hospital's electronic patient records. RESULTS: A total of 96 external cephalic versions were performed in the 2 years before the training program, and 74 after the training program. The overall success rates were similar between the two groups: 44.8 % before training and 43.2 % after training (p = 0.824). No major complications occurred, and no emergency cesarean deliveries were performed in either period. CONCLUSION: In a tertiary care university training center with a dedicated team in external cephalic version, a structured simulation-based training program did not impact the success rate or the complication rates of the procedure.

Trial and error - Outcome of breech presentation depending on birth mode and root cause analysis of severe adverse events.

OBJECTIVES: The debate about the safest birth mode for breech presentation at term remains unresolved. The comparison of a vaginal breech birth (VBB) with an elective caesarean section (CS) regarding fetal outcomes favors the CS. However, the question of whether attempting a VBB is associated with poorer fetal outcomes is examined in this study. Additionally, the study evaluates factors contributing to a successful VBB and illustrates possible errors in VBB management. STUDY DESIGN: We performed a retrospective analysis of term breech births over 15 years in a Perinatal Center Level I regarding fetal, maternal, and obstetric outcomes by comparing successful with unsuccessful VBB attempt and all attempted VBB vs. CS including a multivariate analysis of predictors for a successful VBB. A root cause analysis of severe adverse events (SAE) was conducted to evaluate factors leading to poorer fetal outcomes in VBB. RESULTS: Of 863 breech cases, in 78 % a CS was performed and in 22 % a VBB was attempted, with 57 % succeeding. Comparing successful with unsuccessful VBB attempts, successful VBB showed significantly lower maternal blood loss (p < 0.001) but poorer umbilical arterial pH (UApH) (p < 0.001), while other fetal outcome parameters showed no significant differences. Predictive factors for a successful VBB attempt were a body mass index (BMI) below 30.0 kg/m2 (p = 0.010) and multiparity (p = 0.003). Comparing all attempted VBB to CS, maternal blood loss was significantly higher in CS (p < 0.001), while fetal outcomes were significantly worse in VBB attempts, included poorer Apgar scores (p < 0.001), poorer UApH values (p < 0.001), higher transfer rate to the Neonatal Intensive Care Unit (NICU) (p < 0.001) and higher rate of respiratory support in the first 24 h (p = 0.003). CONCLUSION: The failed attempt of VBB indicates significantly worse UApH without lower Apgar scores or higher transfer rate to the NICU. The likelihood of a successful VBB is 9% lower with obesity and 2.5 times higher in multiparous women. Attempting a VBB should include detailed pre-labor counseling, regarding predictive success factors, an experienced team, and consistent management during birth.

Effect of anesthesia on the success rate of external cephalic version: GRADE- assessed systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

BACKGROUND: External cephalic version (ECV) is a medical procedure in which an extracorporeal manipulation is performed to render the breech presentation (BP) fetus in the cephalic position. The use of anesthesia to facilitate repositioning has been evaluated in various randomized clinical trials (RCTs), but its potential effectiveness remains controversial. METHODS: A systematic literature search was carried out in 8 electronic databases. In the meta-analysis, a random effects model was used to calculate the pooled relative risk (RR) and its 95% confidence interval (CI), and the pooled standardized mean difference (SMD) and its 95% CI, in order to systematically assess the effect of anesthesia on the success rates of ECV, vaginal delivery, cesarean delivery as well as other outcomes. Relevant subgroup analyses, publication bias test and sensitivity analyses were also conducted. RESULTS: This review included 17 RCTs. Women who received anesthesia had a significantly higher incidence of successful ECV (RR: 1.37, 95% CIs: 1.19-1.58) and vaginal delivery (RR: 1.23, 95% CIs: 1.03-1.47), and a significantly lower incidence of cesarean delivery (RR: 0.69, 95% CIs: 0.53-0.91), compared with those who did not. CONCLUSION: The administration of anesthesia not only significantly reduces maternal pain but also significantly increases the success rate of ECV in women with malpresentation at term, leading to a significant rise in the incidence of vaginal delivery. However, it may increase the incidence of maternal hypotension. SYSTEMATIC REVIEW REGISTRATION: The protocol was prospectively registered with PROSPERO, registration CRD42022381552.

Routine maneuvers in eutocic breech vaginal delivery at term: A prospective cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: To study neonatal and maternal outcomes associated with routine maneuvers in breech vaginal delivery at term. METHODS: This was a secondary analysis of the multicenter PREMODA observational prospective study in France and Belgium. We included women with vaginal breech delivery, excluding those who underwent maneuvers to resolve a dystocic delivery. Maternal data and characteristics of labor, in addition to neonatal and maternal outcomes, were recorded. We defined two groups according to mode of delivery; breech vaginal delivery with or without routine maneuvers, and we compared the variables between the groups. To assess the factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes, a multivariate logistic regression with adjustment for confounders was performed. RESULTS: Of the 2502 women with planned vaginal deliveries, 1794 were delivered vaginally, 606 of whom were excluded from the study due to maneuvers performed for dystocia. A total of 25 other patients were excluded as a result of missing data. A total of 537 women were included in the routine maneuvers group and 626 women in the no maneuvers group. Adverse perinatal outcome was similar for the two groups (4.5% vs 5.0%, P = 0.65) and no neonatal deaths were reported. Third degree perineal tear and postpartum hemorrhage >1 L rates were comparable for the two groups. After adjustment, the factors associated with adverse perinatal outcomes were primiparity and birth weight <2500 g. CONCLUSION: Routine maneuvers were not associated with an increase in neonatal morbidity in our population.

Maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with breech presentation in planned community (home and birth center) births in the United States: A prospective observational cohort study.

OBJECTIVE: Investigate maternal and neonatal outcomes associated with breech presentation in planned community births in the United States, including outcomes associated with types of breech presentation (i.e., frank, complete, footling/kneeling). DESIGN: Secondary analysis of prospective cohort data from a national perinatal data registry (MANA Stats). SETTING: Planned community birth (homes and birth centers), United States. SAMPLE: Individuals with a term, singleton gestation (N = 71,943) planning community birth at labor onset. METHODS: Descriptive statistics to calculate associations between types of breech presentation and maternal and neonatal outcomes. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Maternal: intrapartum/postpartum transfer, hospitalization, cesarean, hemorrhage, severe perineal laceration, duration of labor stages and membrane rupture Neonatal: transfer, hospitalization, NICU admission, congenital anomalies, umbilical cord prolapse, birth injury, intrapartum/neonatal death. RESULTS: One percent (n = 695) of individuals experienced breech birth (n = 401, 57.6% vaginally). Most fetuses presented frank breech (57%), with 19% complete, 18% footling/kneeling, and 5% unknown type of breech presentation. Among all breech labors, there were high rates of intrapartum transfer and cesarean birth compared to cephalic presentation (OR 9.0, 95% CI 7.7-10.4 and OR 18.6, 95% CI 15.9-21.7, respectively), with no substantive difference based on parity, planned site of birth, or level of care integration into the health system. For all types of breech presentations, there was increased risk for nearly all assessed neonatal outcomes including hospital transfer, NICU admission, birth injury, and umbilical cord prolapse. Breech presentation was also associated with increased risk of intrapartum/neonatal death (OR 8.5, 95% CI 4.4-16.3), even after congenital anomalies were excluded. CONCLUSIONS: All types of breech presentations in community birth settings are associated with increased risk of adverse neonatal outcomes. These research findings contribute to informed decision-making and reinforce the need for breech training and research and an increase in accessible, high-quality care for planned vaginal breech birth in US hospitals.

Barriers and facilitators for implementation of OptiBreech collaborative care: A qualitative study as part of an implementation process evaluation.

PROBLEM: Lack of opportunity for breech training and clinical experience reduced professional confidence and expertise in supporting vaginal breech birth. BACKGROUND: OptiBreech collaborative care is a care pathway for breech presentation at term that aims to enable improve safety through person-centred care and improved training opportunities for maternity professionals, within dedicated clinics and intrapartum support. In feasibility work, barriers and facilitators to team implementation were observed by team members. AIM: This study sought to describe factors affecting optimal future implementation and safety of OptiBreech care. METHODS: Semi-structured interviews were conducted with staff members at 13 OptiBreech trial sites (17 midwives and 4 obstetricians, n=21), via video conferencing software. The Theoretical Domains Framework (TDF) was used to identify factors impacting team implementation. Themes identified in the TDF were refined in reflexive discussion and grouped into key facilitators, key barriers, and dynamic factors (which span both barriers and facilitators). The interviews were then coded, analysed, and interpreted according to the refined framework. FINDINGS: The key facilitators were broadly categorised within skill development, beliefs about capabilities, and social support from the wider multidisciplinary team. Key barrier categories were resources, social obstacles, and fears about consequences. Dynamic factor categories were individual responsibility, training, and attending births. CONCLUSION: While some factors affecting implementation were specific to the individuals and cultures of certain Trusts, recommendations emerged from analysis that are more widely applicable across multiple settings. These should be considered going forward for future service implementation, and in the next stage of OptiBreech clinical trials.

How to: a breech vaginal delivery before 25 weeks of gestation.

Delivery before 25 weeks of gestation has become a more frequent occurrence in our maternity units and can be a difficult obstetrical situation to manage when the fetus is breech. We describe a new obstetrical maneuver enabling vaginal birth of a breech fetus before 25 weeks of gestation. It enables the fetal mobile to be fully grasped and secured, thus facilitating passage through the genital tract.

Malpresentation and autism spectrum disorder in the study to explore early development.

BACKGROUND: An infant's presentation at delivery may be an early indicator of developmental differences. Non-vertex presentation (malpresentation) complicates delivery and often leads to caesarean section, which has been associated with neurodevelopmental delays, including autism spectrum disorder (ASD). However, malpresentation could be an early sign of an existing developmental problem that is also an upstream factor from caesarean delivery. Little research has been done to investigate the association between malpresentation and ASD. OBJECTIVES: We examine the association between malpresentation at delivery and ASD and whether this association differs by gestational age. METHODS: We used data from the Study to Explore Early Development (SEED), a multi-site, case-control study of children with ASD compared to population controls. The foetal presentation was determined using medical records, birth records and maternal interviews. We defined malpresentation as a non-vertex presentation at delivery, then further categorised into breech and other malpresentation. We used multivariable logistic regression to estimate the adjusted odds ratio (aOR) for the association between malpresentation and ASD. RESULTS: We included 4047 SEED participants, 1873 children with ASD and 2174 controls. At delivery, most infants presented vertex (n = 3760, 92.9%). Malpresentation was associated with higher odds of ASD (aOR 1.31, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.02, 1.68) after adjustment for maternal age, poverty level, hypertensive disorder and smoking. The association was similar for breech and other types of malpresentation (aOR 1.28, 95% CI 0.97, 1.70 and aOR 1.40, 95% CI 0.87, 2.26, respectively) and did not differ markedly by gestational age. CONCLUSIONS: Malpresentation at delivery was modestly associated with ASD. Early monitoring of the neurodevelopment of children born with malpresentation could identify children with ASD sooner and enhance opportunities to provide support to optimise developmental outcomes.

Cesarean section prior to 28 weeks' gestation: which type of uterine incision is optimal?

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to determine the factors that influence physician preference for type of hysterotomy incisions in gravidas with a singleton or twin pregnancy undergoing cesarean section under 28 weeks, and to assess factors that result in delivery complications, defined as either intraoperative dystocia or hysterotomy extension. We hypothesized that compared to those with non-cephalic presentations, gravidas with a presenting fetus in cephalic presentation would have higher rates of low-transverse cesarean section, and reduced rates of delivery complications with low-transverse hysterotomy. METHODS: This was a retrospective cohort chart analysis of 128 gravidas between 23 0/7 and 27 6/7 weeks undergoing cesarean section at a single academic institution between August 2010 and December 2022. Data was abstracted for factors that might influence the decision for hysterotomy incision type, as well as for documentation of difficulty with delivery of the fetus or need for hysterotomy extension to affect delivery. RESULTS: There was a total of 128 subjects, 113 with a singleton gestation and 15 with twins. The presenting fetus was in cephalic presentation in 43 (33.6%), breech presentation in 71 (55.5%), transverse/oblique lie in 13 (10.2%), and not documented in 1 (0.8%). Sixty-eight (53.1%) had a low-transverse cesarean section (LTCS), 53 (41.4%) had a Classical, 5 (3.9%) had a low-vertical hysterotomy and 2 (1.6%) had a mid-transverse incision. There was a significantly higher rate of LTCS among gravidas with the presenting fetus in cephalic presentation (30/43, 69.8%) compared to those with breech (31/71, 43.7%) or transverse/oblique presentations (7/13, 53.8%), p = .03. No other significant associations were related to hysterotomy incision, including nulliparity, racially or ethnically minoritized status, plurality, indication for cesarean delivery, or pre-cesarean labor. Twenty (15.6%) subjects experienced either an intraoperative dystocia or hysterotomy extension. For the entire cohort, there was a greater median cervical dilatation in those with delivery complications (4.0 cm, IQR .5 - 10 cm) compared to those without complications (1.5, IQR 0 - 4.0), p = .03, but no significant association between delivery complications and fetal presentation, hysterotomy type, plurality, or other demographic/obstetrical factors. However, among gravidas undergoing low-transverse cesarean section, only 2/30 (6.7%) with cephalic presentations had a delivery complication, compared to 9/31 (29.0%) with breech presentations and 3/7 (42.9%) with a transverse/oblique lie, p = .03. CONCLUSION: In pregnancies under 28 weeks, the performance of a low-transverse cesarean section was significantly associated only with presentation of the presenting fetus. Among those with cephalic presentations, the rate of intrapartum dystocia or hysterotomy extension was low after a low-transverse hysterotomy, suggesting that in this subgroup, a low-transverse cesarean section should be considered.

Variations of cervical head entrapment in vaginal breech births: New insights on how to prevent, manage and resolve.

This paper presents a novel, systematic way to understand the causes of cervical head entrapment in vaginal breech births, and new insights into management. Three different types of cervical head entrapment are described, with detailed illustrations: unpredictable and potentially catastrophic, manageable, and preventable. The first affects preterm and growth-restricted fetuses. The second involves some degree of uterine prolapse. The third may result from prolonged head entrapment at the pelvic inlet, leaving time for cervical contraction or oedematous entrapment. Traditional and innovative strategies to resolve and prevent this complication are described and illustrated, with suggestions for further research.

[Ready to Care for Pregnant Women with Breech Presentation? - Results from an Online Survey for Midwives and Midwifery Students in Germany, Austria, and Switzerland]. / Bereit für die Betreuung von Schwangeren mit Beckenendlage? ­ Ergebnisse aus einer Onlinebefragung für Hebammen und werdende Hebammen in Deutschland, Österreich und der Schweiz.

The vaginal birth of breech presentation is an option for pregnant women supported by current German and international guidelines when favorable conditions and appropriately trained personnel are available. According to midwifery laws in the D-A-CH region, midwives should be able to provide care for a vaginal breech birth in emergencies. Therefore, imparting skills for breech delivery is enshrined in the curriculum for midwifery students. This study evaluated the knowledge and training needs of midwives and midwifery students in the German-speaking region. In May 2022, experiences, specific knowledge, and further training needs regarding vaginal breech birth were assessed through an online survey. Analysis of 467 questionnaires showed that only 30% of respondents currently attend vaginal breech births in their professional environment, but 50% would like to offer this service. 94% of respondents indicated that they would feel more confident if regular training opportunities, particularly simulations and virtual offerings, were provided for vaginal breech birth. However, currently only 10% of respondents receive regular training opportunities for vaginal breech births. The results suggest an increased provision of training opportunities for vaginal breech births to enhance midwives' safety in managing such births.

Caesarean section delivery rates and associated factors in a faith-based referral hospital in Ghana: A retrospective analysis.

INTRODUCTION: The global incidence of caesarean section (CS) deliveries has exceeded the recommended threshold set by the World Health Organization. This development is a matter of public health concern due to the cost involved and the potential health risk to the mother and the neonate. We sought to investigate the prevalence, indications, maternal and neonatal outcomes and determinants of CS in private health facilities in Ghana. METHOD: A retrospective cross-sectional analysis was conducted using data from women who delivered at the Holy Family Hospital from January to February 2020 using descriptive and inferential statistics, with a significance level set at p<0.05. RESULTS: The prevalence of CS was 28.70%. The primary indications of C/S include previous C/S, foetal distress, breech presentation, pathological CTG and failed induction. Significant associations were found between CS and breech presentation (AOR = 4.60; 95%CI: 1.22-17.38) p<0.024, previous CS history (AOR = 51.72, 95% CI: 11.59-230.70) p<0.00, and neonates referred to NICU (AOR = 3.67, 95% CI: 2.10-6.42) p<0.00. CONCLUSION: The prevalence of caesarean section (CS) deliveries was higher than the WHO-recommended threshold. Major indications for CS included previous CS, fetal distress, and failed induction. Significant risk factors for CS were previous CS history, breech presentation, and neonates referred to NICU.

The influence of uterine fibroids on adverse outcomes in pregnant women: a meta-analysis.

OBJECTIVE: The objective of the meta-analysis was to determine the influence of uterine fibroids on adverse outcomes, with specific emphasis on multiple or large (≥ 5 cm in diameter) fibroids. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We searched PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, ClinicalTrials.gov, China National Knowledge Infrastructure (CNKI), and SinoMed databases for eligible studies that investigated the influence of uterine fibroids on adverse outcomes in pregnancy. The pooled risk ratio (RR) of the variables was estimated with fixed effect or random effect models. RESULTS: Twenty-four studies with 237 509 participants were included. The pooled results showed that fibroids elevated the risk of adverse outcomes, including preterm birth, cesarean delivery, placenta previa, miscarriage, preterm premature rupture of membranes (PPROM), placental abruption, postpartum hemorrhage (PPH), fetal distress, malposition, intrauterine fetal death, low birth weight, breech presentation, and preeclampsia. However, after adjusting for the potential factors, negative effects were only seen for preterm birth, cesarean delivery, placenta previa, placental abruption, PPH, intrauterine fetal death, breech presentation, and preeclampsia. Subgroup analysis showed an association between larger fibroids and significantly elevated risks of breech presentation, PPH, and placenta previa in comparison with small fibroids. Multiple fibroids did not increase the risk of breech presentation, placental abruption, cesarean delivery, PPH, placenta previa, PPROM, preterm birth, and intrauterine growth restriction. Meta-regression analyses indicated that maternal age only affected the relationship between uterine fibroids and preterm birth, and BMI influenced the relationship between uterine fibroids and intrauterine fetal death. Other potential confounding factors had no impact on malposition, fetal distress, PPROM, miscarriage, placenta previa, placental abruption, and PPH. CONCLUSION: The presence of uterine fibroids poses increased risks of adverse pregnancy and obstetric outcomes. Fibroid size influenced the risk of breech presentation, PPH, and placenta previa, while fibroid numbers had no impact on the risk of these outcomes.

The usefulness of universal ultrasound before hospital discharge for early diagnosing hip dysplasia in Korean neonates with breech presentation in a single center: A retrospective study.

Developmental dysplasia of the hip (DDH) is a broad-spectrum disorder. Early diagnosis and treatment are important for improved prognosis and a lower risk of long-term complications. Selecting high-risk infants is important for the early diagnosis of DDH using ultrasonography; however, there are no standard international guidelines. This study aimed to identify the usefulness of universal ultrasound before hospital discharge in breech-born neonates and proposes selective ultrasound for high-risk patients. A retrospective chart review was conducted to identify breech-born neonates who underwent hip ultrasonography before discharge for the detection of DDH between 2019 and 2023. Patients were categorized into DDH and non-DDH groups according to the ultrasound results. We compared sex, gestational age, birth weight, first-born status, twin pregnancy, associated anomalies, presence of symptoms, physical examination results, and timing of the first hip ultrasound. The medical records of the mothers were reviewed to identify the amount of amniotic fluid and duration of breech presentation. This study included 102 patients, of whom 62 and 40 were assigned to the non-DDH and DDH groups, respectively. Congenital anomalies, positive symptoms, and positive physical examination results were significant risk factors. However, female sex, first-born status, and oligohydramnios were not statistically significant. The duration of breech presentation during pregnancy was not significant. Additionally, the risk of Pavlik harnesses was higher in patients who underwent a positive physical examination. Universal ultrasonography before discharge is not recommended for the early diagnosis of DDH in all breech-born neonates because of the high rate of overdiagnosis. We recommend that ultrasonography be performed in patients with congenital anomalies, except for foot problems, or in those with a positive physical examination conducted by trained specialists.