Prilocaine- and lidocaine-induced methemoglobinemia is caused by human carboxylesterase-, CYP2E1-, and CYP3A4-mediated metabolic activation.

Prilocaine and lidocaine are classified as amide-type local anesthetics for which serious adverse effects include methemoglobinemia. Although the hydrolyzed metabolites of prilocaine (o-toluidine) and lidocaine (2,6-xylidine) have been suspected to induce methemoglobinemia, the metabolic enzymes that are involved remain uncharacterized. In the present study, we aimed to identify the human enzymes that are responsible for prilocaine- and lidocaine-induced methemoglobinemia. Our experiments revealed that prilocaine was hydrolyzed by recombinant human carboxylesterase (CES) 1A and CES2, whereas lidocaine was hydrolyzed by only human CES1A. When the parent compounds (prilocaine and lidocaine) were incubated with human liver microsomes (HLM), methemoglobin (Met-Hb) formation was lower than when the hydrolyzed metabolites were incubated with HLM. In addition, Met-Hb formation when prilocaine and o-toluidine were incubated with HLM was higher than that when lidocaine and 2,6-xylidine were incubated with HLM. Incubation with diisopropyl fluorophosphate and bis-(4-nitrophenyl) phosphate, which are general inhibitors of CES, significantly decreased Met-Hb formation when prilocaine and lidocaine were incubated with HLM. An anti-CYP3A4 antibody further decreased the residual formation of Met-Hb. Met-Hb formation after the incubation of o-toluidine and 2,6-xylidine with HLM was only markedly decreased by incubation with an anti-CYP2E1 antibody. o-Toluidine and 2,6-xylidine were further metabolized by CYP2E1 to 4- and 6-hydroxy-o-toluidine and 4-hydroxy-2,6-xylidine, respectively, and these metabolites were shown to more efficiently induce Met-Hb formation than the parent compounds. Collectively, we found that the metabolites produced by human CES-, CYP2E1-, and CYP3A4-mediated metabolism were involved in prilocaine- and lidocaine-induced methemoglobinemia.

Effect of lidocaine- and prilocaine-based topical anesthetics on the inflammatory exudates in subcutaneous tissue of rats.

The aim of this present study was to evaluate the irritative potential of 2 topical anesthetics used in intrapocket anesthesia for periodontal scaling/root planing when applied in subcutaneous tissue of rats. Sixty animals were divided into 4 groups: group 1, saline solution (control); group 2, poloxamer gel (thermosetting vehicle); group 3, lidocaine and prilocaine poloxamer thermosetting gel; group 4: EMLA, a lidocaine and prilocaine dermatological cream. Injections of 2% Evans blue were administrated intravenously into the lateral caudal vein. In order to analyze vascular permeability, the tested substances were injected intradermally. The rats were sacrificed 3, 6, and 9 hours after injection of the substances. The dorsal skin was dissected and removed. The vascular permeability was evaluated by the measurement of area of dye extravasation and the dye was subsequently extracted after immersion in formamide. Statistical analyses were made by ANOVA with Bonferroni's post hoc test and Pearson correlation. The 2 methods to analyze the exudative phase of the inflammatory process showed statistically significant difference among the groups and periods of evaluation (P < .05). Both methods had a significant correlation (P < .0001). Under the tested conditions, the anesthetic agents showed mild initial inflammatory response when implanted in subcutaneous connective tissue.

Local anesthetics structure-dependently interact with anionic phospholipid membranes to modify the fluidity.

While bupivacaine is more cardiotoxic than other local anesthetics, the mechanistic background for different toxic effects remains unclear. Several cardiotoxic compounds act on lipid bilayers to change the physicochemical properties of membranes. We comparatively studied the interaction of local anesthetics with lipid membranous systems which might be related to their structure-selective cardiotoxicity. Amide local anesthetics (10-300 microM) were reacted with unilamellar vesicles which were prepared with different phospholipids and cholesterol of varying lipid compositions. They were compared on the potencies to modify membrane fluidity by measuring fluorescence polarization. Local anesthetics interacted with liposomal membranes to increase the fluidity. Increasing anionic phospholipids in membranes enhanced the membrane-fluidizing effects of local anesthetics with the potency being cardiolipin>>phosphatidic acid>phosphatidylglycerol>phosphatidylserine. Cardiolipin was most effective on bupivacaine, followed by ropivacaine. Local anesthetics interacted differently with biomimetic membranes consisting of 10mol% cardiolipin, 50mol% other phospholipids and 40mol% cholesterol with the potency being bupivacaine>>ropivacaine>lidocaine>prilocaine, which agreed with the rank order of cardiotoxicity. Bupivacaine significantly fluidized 2.5-12.5mol% cardiolipin-containing membranes at cardiotoxicologically relevant concentrations. Bupivacaine is considered to affect lipid bilayers by interacting electrostatically with negatively charged cardiolipin head groups and hydrophobically with phospholipid acyl chains. The structure-dependent interaction with lipid membranes containing cardiolipin, which is preferentially localized in cardiomyocyte mitochondrial membranes, may be a mechanistic clue to explain the structure-selective cardiotoxicity of local anesthetics.

Spinal procaine is less neurotoxic than mepivacaine, prilocaine and bupivacaine in rats.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Lidocaine has been reported to be more neurotoxic than other local anesthetics. Alternatives to lidocaine with lower toxicity and shorter duration of action are desirable. Therefore, we compared the histologic and functional changes induced by intrathecal injection of prilocaine, mepivacaine, procaine, and bupivacaine in rats. METHODS: Rats (n = 184) randomly received via an intrathecal catheter 0.12 microL/g body weight of 2%, 10%, 16%, or 20% prilocaine, mepivacaine, or procaine; 0%, 0.5%, 2.5%, 4%, or 5% bupivacaine in distilled water; or distilled water or 15% glucose solution alone as a control. We evaluated neurofunction by analyzing walking behavior and sensory threshold and examined the L3 spinal cord, posterior and anterior roots, and cauda equina by light and electron microscopy. RESULTS: The recovery time to normal ambulation after intrathecal injection was significantly faster with procaine than with the other 3 drugs at all concentrations. There were no significant differences in the sensory threshold among the 4 anesthetics. Histologic damage was observed only in rats treated with greater than 16% prilocaine or mepivacaine or with greater than 4% bupivacaine. Histologic damage occurred at the posterior root and posterior white matter and was characterized by axonal degeneration. Rats treated with procaine, even at 20%, showed no histologic abnormalities. CONCLUSION: In this animal model, the neurotoxicity of intrathecal procaine was the mildest, and the recovery time to ambulation with procaine was the fastest among the 4 tested anesthetics.

Assessment of genotoxicity of Lidocaine, Prilonest and Septanest in the Drosophila wing-spot test.

The scope of this study was to characterize the likely interaction Lidocaine, Prilonest and Septanest have with DNA, with a view to quantitatively and qualitatively establishing mutagenic, clastogenic, and/or recombinagenic activity of those compounds. The wing somatic mutation and recombination test in Drosophila melanogaster, which detects simultaneously point and chromosomal mutations as well as recombination induced by the activity of genotoxins of direct and indirect action, was used. Each of the anesthetics was tested at different concentrations, administered orally for 48 h to 3rd-stage larvae, in two independent experiments, with concurrent negative controls. The results obtained revealed that only Prilonest exhibits genotoxic activity in somatic cells, being able to induce exclusively homologous recombination. Additionally, it was possible to conclude that the genotoxic effect attributed to Prilonest is not related to metabolites produced via the P450-type enzymes. However, both Lidocaine and Septanest are unable to induce either events related to gene and chromosomal mutation, or reciprocal recombination.

Stability and local toxicity evaluation of a liposomal prilocaine formulation.

This study reports a physicochemical stability evaluation of a previously reported liposomal prilocaine (PLC(LUV)) formulation (Cereda et al. J. Pharm. Pharmaceut. Sci. 7:235, 2004) before and after steam sterilization as well as its local toxicity evaluation. Prilocaine (PLC) was encapsulated into extruded unilamellar liposomes (LUVs) composed by egg phosphatidylcholine:cholesterol:alfa-tocopherol (4:3:0.07, mole %). Laser light-scattering analysis (p > 0.05) and thiobarbituric acid reaction (p > 0.05) were used to evaluate the liposomes physical (size) and chemical (oxidation) stability, respectively. The prilocaine chemical stability was followed by (1)H-nuclear magnetic resonance. These tests detected no differences on the physicochemical stability of PLC or PLC(LUV), sterilized or not, up to 30 days after preparation (p > 0.05). Finally, the paw edema test and histological analysis of rat oral mucosa were used to assess the possible inflammatory effects of PLC(LUV). PLC(LUV) did not evoke rat paw edema (p > 0.05), and no significant differences were found in histological analysis, when compared to the control groups (p > 0.05). The present work shows that PLC(LUV) is stable for a 30-day period and did not induce significant inflammatory effects both in the paw edema test and in histological analysis, giving supporting evidence for its safety and possible clinical use in dentistry.

The effects of general anesthesia on the central nervous and cardiovascular system toxicity of local anesthetics.

BACKGROUND: Local anesthetic toxicity is often studied experimentally in acutely prepared, anesthetized laboratory animals. We determined the influence of halothane/O(2) anesthesia on cardiovascular and central nervous system (CNS) toxic responses to six amide-type local anesthetics administered i.v.. METHODS: Behavioral, cardiovascular, and pharmacokinetic responses were determined in previously instrumented ewes (approximately 45-50 kg, n = 18), on separate occasions when conscious and anesthetized, to bupivacaine (100 mg), levobupivacaine (125 mg), ropivacaine (150 mg), lidocaine (350 mg), mepivacaine (350 mg), prilocaine (350 mg), and saline (control) infused i.v. over 3 min. RESULTS: The local anesthetics caused convulsions in conscious sheep, but no overt CNS effects in anesthetized sheep. Negative inotropy and slight bradycardia without changes in arterial blood pressure occurred initially in conscious sheep, followed by positive inotropy, tachycardia, and hypertension at the abrupt onset of CNS excitotoxicity, along with widening of QRS complexes. Fatal cardiac arrhythmias occurred in, respectively, 3 of 11, 2 of 12, and 2 of 13 conscious sheep infused with bupivacaine, levobupivacaine, and ropivacaine; in 1 of 9 with prilocaine, electromechanical dissociation (followed by polymorphic ventricular tachycardia) caused death. In anesthetized sheep, cardiovascular depression, preexisting from the general anesthesia, was exacerbated by all local anesthetics, and increased QRS width was prolonged; concurrent blood local anesthetic concentrations were doubled. Nevertheless, all anesthetized animals survived. CONCLUSIONS: General anesthesia produced physiological perturbations, exacerbated local anesthetic-induced cardiovascular depression, and changed the pharmacokinetics of toxic doses of local anesthetics. However, cardiovascular fatalities from local anesthetics occurred only in conscious animals.

Intrathecal mepivacaine and prilocaine are less neurotoxic than lidocaine in a rat intrathecal model.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Histologic evidence of the comparative neurotoxicity of lidocaine, mepivacaine, and prilocaine is incomplete. We compared the intrathecal neurotoxicity in rats among these 3 drugs based on morphologic and neurofunctional findings. METHODS: Rats (n=169) randomly received 0.12 microL/g of 0%, 2%, 5%, 7.5%, 10%, or 20% lidocaine, mepivacaine, or prilocaine or 25% glucose dissolved in distilled water via a chronically implanted intrathecal catheter. The effect of the agents on neurofunction was evaluated by movement of the hind limb (behavior test) and by sensory threshold (paw-stimulation test). The L1 spinal cord, the posterior and anterior roots, and the cauda equina were removed en bloc 5 days later and examined by light and electron microscopy. RESULTS: A significant decrease in sensory threshold or irreversible hind-limb limitation was observed only in rats receiving 20% lidocaine. Morphologic abnormalities characterized by axonal degeneration were observed in rats receiving > or =7.5% lidocaine, 20% mepivacaine, and 20% prilocaine, at the posterior white matter and the proximal portion of the posterior root just at the entrance into the spinal cord. The incidence of lesions was significantly higher in rats receiving lidocaine than mepivacaine and prilocaine. CONCLUSION: It is suggested that intrathecal mepivacaine and prilocaine are less neurotoxic than highly concentrated lidocaine in a rat intrathecal model.

Plasma levels of lidocaine, o-toluidine, and prilocaine after application of 8.5 g Oraqix in patients with generalized periodontitis: effect on blood methemoglobin and tolerability.

Oraqix, a novel non-injectable anesthetic gel containing lidocaine and prilocaine and a thermosetting agent has been developed to provide localized anesthesia in periodontal pockets during scaling/root planing (SRP). The aim of this open study was to determine the plasma levels of lidocaine and prilocaine following application of 8.5 g Oraqix (5 cartridges) to 11 patients with generalized periodontitis (> or = 49% of tooth pockets > or = 5 mm and > or = 23% of pockets > or = 6 mm). Oraqix was applied to the pockets during periodontal probing and SRP over a 2.6 3.4 h period. Blood samples were collected up to 10 h after the start of application of Oraqix. Peak plasma levels of lidocaine (0.16-0.55 mg/L) and prilocaine (0.05-0.18 mg/L) occurred 2.0-3.7 h and 2.0-3.3 h, respectively, after the start of application of Oraqix. These levels are well below threshold levels for initial signs of central nervous system (CNS) toxicity. In conclusion, application of 8.5 g Oraqix (212.5 mg of lidocaine base and 212.5 mg of prilocaine base) in periodontal pockets was well tolerated and displayed a wide safety margin with respect to plasma levels normally associated with systemic toxicity.

Comparative spinal neurotoxicity of prilocaine and lidocaine.

BACKGROUND: Reports of major and minor sequelae following lidocaine spinal anesthesia have generated interest in an alternative short-acting intrathecal agent. Of the available anesthetics suitable for short-duration spinal anesthesia, prilocaine is perhaps the most promising agent. However, data comparing the neurotoxicity of these agents are lacking. Accordingly, the present experiments investigate whether prilocaine and lidocaine differ with respect to sensory impairment and histologic damage when administered intrathecally in the rat. METHODS: Ninety rats were divided into three groups to receive an intrathecal infusion of 2.5% prilocaine in saline, 2.5% lidocaine in saline, or normal saline. The animals were assessed for persistent sensory impairment 4 days after anesthetic administration using the tail-flick test. Three days later, the animals were killed, and specimens of the spinal cord and nerve roots were obtained for histopathologic examination. RESULTS: Prilocaine and lidocaine produced equivalent elevations in tail-flick latency that differed significantly from saline. Histologic injury scores with prilocaine were greater than with lidocaine, but this difference did not reach statistical significance. CONCLUSIONS: The propensity for persistent functional impairment or morphologic damage with intrathecal prilocaine is at least as great as with lidocaine. Although the substitution of prilocaine for lidocaine may reduce the incidence of transient neurologic symptoms, it is unlikely to reduce the risk of actual neural injury. This discrepancy may indicate that transient neurologic symptoms and neurologic deficits after spinal anesthesia are not mediated by the same mechanism.

Verification of protector effect of the norepinephrine and felypressin upon the cardiovascular system under action of the lidocaine hydrochloride and prilocaine hydrochloride in anesthetized rats.

Vasoconstrictor substances, as norepinephrine and epinephrine, were mixtured to local anesthetics to decrease their toxic effects and to prolong the depth of the anesthesia. However, these catecholamines produce systolic and diastolic hypertension. The effects of felypressin, a synthetic vasoconstrictor, upon arterial blood pressure and heart are lesser than those of norepinephrine or epinephrine, but due to its effects like oxytocin these catecholamines are yet the most used vasoconstrictors in association with lidocaine or another anesthetic salt. These vasoconstrictors are contraindicated for some physician, mainly for cardiac patients. But, are the catecholamines or is the salt the most dangerous components of the local anesthetic? The effects of the salt and catecholamines are opposite, but which of these exercises their effects first when inside blood vessel? Singi et al. [Pharmacol. Res. 44 (2001)] demonstrated that the first effect is always of the salt and that norepinephrine promotes protector effects upon guinea-pig isolated heart against lidocaine action. But, is this true for in vivo animals? The present study was performed with the aiming to answer this question and to verify if felypressin can induce the same effect of the norepinephrine. Fourteen Rattus norvegicus albinus, weighing 350g on average, were used. After being anesthetized with sodic thiopental, they were tracheostomizeds and one jugular and one carotid were cannuled for application of substances and to record the blood arterial pressure, respectively. The ECG was gotten through electrodes located in the front and back paws of the animals. The animals were separated in two groups, each one with seven rats. The lidocaine hydrochloride 2% in the doses of 600 microg and 3% in the doses of 900 microg acted on the cardiovascular system reducing the arterial pressure and modifying the electrocardiogram, while the prilocaine hydrochloride, in the same doses, also reduced the arterial pressure, but did not modify the electrocardiogram. When norepinephrine was associated to lidocaine 3% hydrochloride, it was possible to observe that this salt always exercised its effect first and a protective effect against the fall of pressure produced for the lidocaine. The same protective effect did not occur when felypressin was associated with prilocaine hydrochloride 3%.

Acute toxicity (LD50 and CD50) of lidocaine and prilocaine in combination with adrenaline and felypressin.

The toxicity of the combination of vasoconstrictors to local anaesthetic solutions has been debated since its first use in the beginning of this century. A combination of two vasoconstrictors to a local anaesthetic has been proposed by some researchers. In this study they were evaluated the acute toxicity (lethal dose 50%, convulsion dose 50%) and latency times of loss of righting reflex and convulsion as well as the duration of convulsion) of 2% lidocaine or 3% prilocaine, when administered in combination with adrenaline and felypressin at various concentrations. Lethal dose 50% studies showed that for both anaesthetics the solutions with higher concentrations of adrenaline were more toxic. The opposite was observed in the convulsion dose 50% studies. No alterations were observed in the control groups. All lidocaine solutions increased the latency of loss of righting reflex. The latency of convulsion was increased in some groups, but once the convulsion was achieved there was no difference in its duration. There was no statistical difference among prilocaine groups for any of the variables studied. Based on the experimental model studied, it was concluded that there is no advantage in the association of two vasoconstrictors concerning the toxicity of lidocaine and prilocaine solutions.

Ocular toxicity following topical application of anesthetic cream to the eyelid skin.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: The use of topical anesthetic cream in the periorbital region may be of clinical value. The potential for toxic effects from such use has not been studied in a controlled manner. This study was performed to evaluate the potential ocular toxicity of anesthetic cream topically applied to the eyelid in an animal model. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Ten rabbits underwent periorbital eutectic mixture of local anesthetics (EMLA) (2.5 percent lidocaine and 2.5 percent prilocaine) application and were observed for evidence of gross or microscopic ocular toxicity. Baseline external and anterior segment examinations were performed, including biomicroscopy and fluorescein staining, after which a standard quantity of EMLA cream (0.75 g) was applied along the upper eyelid and covered with an occlusive dressing. After 1 hour of treatment, the eyelid and anterior segment were examined for evidence of adverse reaction. The eyelids were excised and examined histopathologically. RESULTS: No significant adverse effects were noted on external lid and anterior segment examination. The histopathologic findings were within normal limits. CONCLUSIONS: This study suggests that external application of EMLA cream to the eyelid does not induce local toxicity in the rabbit model. The external application of EMLA cream may be safe in the periorbital region.

Comparison of acute central nervous system and cardiovascular toxicity of 2-chloroprocaine and prilocaine in the rat.

In this study, we compared the central nervous system and cardiovascular system toxicity of i.v. administered 0.5% 2-chloroprocaine (N = 10) and 0.5% prilocaine (N = 10) in lightly anaesthetised rats. Arterial blood pressure, ECG and EEG were continuously recorded. Prilocaine produced the predetermined toxic end-points (i.e. seizure activity on EEG, isoelectric EEG, cardiac arrhythmia on ECG, asystole on ECG) at significantly lower doses than 2-chloroprocaine (P < 0.05). The mean dose of prilocaine producing asystole was 166 mg.kg-1 (+/- 45 mg.kg-1, s.d.) vs. 255 mg.kg-1 (+/- 42 mg.kg-1) for 2-chloroprocaine (P < 0.01). The rate of decrease of mean arterial blood pressure during the infusion was significantly faster with prilocaine (P < 0.01). Typically, arrhythmias did not appear until just before asystole, suggesting that neither of the local anaesthetics possessed marker arrhythmogenic properties. It is concluded that prilocaine is slightly more toxic than 2-chloroprocaine in the rat, but that both local anaesthetics have a wide margin of safety. Doses producing seizure activity on the EEG (prilocaine 53 mg.kg-1 and 2-chloroprocaine 70 mg.kg-1, on average) are much higher than those used in clinical practice (usually < 10 mg.kg-1).

Damage to tissue defenses by EMLA cream.

EMLA is a new topical agent that safely anesthetizes intact skin. The purpose of this study was to determine if this cream could be safely used for anesthetizing wounds. This investigation evaluated the potential toxicity of EMLA cream in wounds by measuring its effect on host defenses and on the biology of wound repair. In contaminated wounds, EMLA cream elicited an exaggerated inflammatory response that damaged host defenses, inviting the development of infection. As a result of these investigations, we do not recommend the use of EMLA cream in wounds.

Intoxicação sistêmica por anestesia local: relato de um caso / Systemic intoxication induced by local anesthetic: case report

Os autores relatam um caso de intoxicação sistêmica aguda induzida por altas doses de prilocaína. Discutem o mecanismo de formação da metahemoglobinemia e a conduta clínica quando de sua instalação. Advertem quanto a necessidade de uma rígida observância no que se refere à utilização da dose terapêutica máxima para cada tipo de sal anestésico empregado. concluem que o anestésico local prilocaína está contra-indicado em cirurgias buco-maxilo-faciais de médio e grande porte, assim como em pacientes portadores de insuficiência cardíaca, respiratória e deficiências enzimáticas. Destacam que para cada caso em particular, deve-se escolher o anestésico mais adequado

[Intravenous regional anesthesia of the arm and foot using 0.5, 0.75 and 1.0 percent prilocaine]. / Intravenöse Regionalanästhesie an Arm und Fuss mit 0,5-, 0,75- und 1,0prozentigem Prilocain.

Quality of anaesthesia and risk of intoxication are competing principles in IVRA. To evaluate the optimal prilocaine concentration with injection of 40 ml, 300 patients were randomly allocated to receive either a 0.5 (PRI 0.5), 0.75 (PRI 0.5) or a 1.0 (PRI 1.0) per cent solution. Using PRI 0.5, fifteen patients required supplementary fentanyl, with PRI 0.75 one, and with PRI 1.0 two (p less than or equal to 0.05). General anaesthesia proved necessary in three patients of the PRI 0.5 and 0.75 groups, respectively, and in one patient of the PRI 1.0 group (NS). With PRI 1.0 seven patients had subjective signs of intoxication upon tourniquet release, with PRI 0.75 none, and with PRI 0.5 one (p less than or equal to 0.05). Objective symptoms of local anaesthetic toxicity were not observed. The incidence of tourniquet-related pain was 25-30% in all three groups and not related to the prilocaine concentration. In conclusion, with 40 ml injection volume the 0.75% solution of prilocaine offers the optimal relation between incidence of anaesthesia and risk of intoxication.

Examination of toxicity of diisopropylammonium dichloracetate (DADA), remedies for cardiac diseases, toward isolated rat hepatocytes.

Oxygen uptake (OU) and cell viability (CV) of isolated rat hepatocytes as a part of the indexes of hepatopathy were determined following treatment with DADA, the active principle of pangamic acid. DADA increased OU at high concentrations, but not at low ones. However, CV became higher as the concentration became lower. DADA led to no remarkable toxicity when used alone. When the mixture of DADA and calcium gluconate was tested, DADA showed no palliative action; nor did it when combined with other hepatotoxins such as trapidil, rifampicin, hexobarbital, thiopental sodium, and Citanest-octapressin.

Electrophysiological effects of the clinically used local anesthetics lidocaine, lidocaine-prilocaine and phenol on the rat's inner ear.

Local anesthetics, even if applied to the outer ear canal, may still enter the middle ear, running the risk of penetrating the round window. To elucidate the effect of certain topical anesthetics on the inner ear, the round window niche in the laboratory rat's middle ear was exposed separately to lidocaine, lidocaine-prilocaine and phenol. Auditory brain-stem responses (ABR) were recorded at 2, 4, 6, 8, 12, 16, 20, and 31.5 kHz before the application, and 24 h, 3 weeks, 2 months and 6 months after exposure. After terminating the 6-month ABR measurements, the animal were sacrificed and the temporal bones fixed and decalcified for light microscopic analysis. All three drugs affected the ABR thresholds and the cochlear morphology with a pattern characteristic for each drug. At 24 h, all three substances caused severe impairment of ABR thresholds, followed by a period of restitution lasting up to 2 months. Even 6 months after exposure, the ABR thresholds at and above 12 kHz were impaired, as compared with the pretreatment level, for all substances tested. In the lower frequencies the original ABR threshold was reached in the order: (1) lidocaine, (2) lidocaine-prilocaine, (3) phenol. The cochlear structures were unaffected by lidocaine, whereas lidocaine-prilocaine and phenol caused morphological damage which was most pronounced after exposure to phenol. The heterogeneity of the changes in the ABR thresholds suggests differences in the mechanism of action of each type of local anesthetic investigated. The effects following lidocaine were transient. However, clinicians must be aware of the ototoxic potential of both lidocaine and phenol.