Systematic literature review of current treatments for stage I-III Merkel cell carcinoma.

Aim: There is a need to evaluate current treatments for stages I-III of Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC). Materials & methods: A systematic literature review was conducted to understand how patients with stage I-III MCC are treated and assess efficacy, safety, health-related quality of life and economic impact of current therapies. Embase was searched using the following inclusion criteria: publications from 2014 to 2019, in English, with adult patients (≥18 years) with early-stage MCC (i.e., stages I-III) and any interventions/comparators. Publications were excluded if they included only patients with stage IV MCC, had no distinction between early and advanced or metastatic MCC or had no extractable data. Results: A total of 18 retrospective studies were included. Few studies had evidence that surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy significantly increased survival versus surgery alone in early MCC. Limited safety data were reported in three studies. None of the studies reported data on health-related quality of life or economic impact of treatment in patients with early-stage MCC. Conclusion: Although surgery plus adjuvant radiotherapy was a common treatment, no clear standard of care exists for stages I-III MCC and treatment outcomes need to be improved. All studies were retrospective with a high variability in sample sizes; hence, findings should be interpreted with caution.

Comparison of Survival Outcomes With/Without Adjuvant Radiation Therapy in Desmoplastic Melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Desmoplastic melanoma (DM) is a rare variant of cutaneous melanoma with a high rate of local recurrence. Recent studies have indicated a potential benefit in local control with the addition of adjuvant radiotherapy (RT). OBJECTIVE: This study sought to evaluate the outcomes of adjuvant RT for patients with DM. MATERIALS AND METHODS: The National Cancer Database was queried (2004-2015) for patients with newly diagnosed, nonmetastatic DM. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on the adjuvant therapy they received: RT or observation. Statistics included multivariable logistic regression to determine factors predictive of receiving adjuvant RT, Kaplan-Meier analysis to evaluate overall survival (OS), and Cox proportional hazards modeling to determine variables associated with OS. RESULTS: There was no difference in median OS between patients treated with RT when compared with patients observed (111.4 months vs 133.9 months, p = .1312). On multivariable analysis, older age, T stage ≥2, N stage ≥1, and no receipt of immunotherapy were associated with worse OS. CONCLUSION: In this large study evaluating efficacy of adjuvant RT in DM, no overall survival benefit was observed among patients receiving adjuvant RT.

Survey of Dermatologic Procedures in Transgender Adults.

BACKGROUND: Dermatologists have the opportunity to provide medically necessary procedures, including laser hair removal, to transgender patients for gender affirmation. Further research is required to better assess the unique dermatologic needs of this population. OBJECTIVE: To examine the prevalence of dermatologic procedures among transgender people in the context of gender-affirming treatment. METHODS: This cross-sectional study examined survey responses from 696 transgender persons enrolled in the Study of Transition, Outcomes, and Gender cohort. Prevalence of self-reported dermatologic procedures was examined and compared across participant subgroups. RESULTS: Electrolysis was the most commonly reported procedure (32.9%). Transfeminine patients were more likely to use dermatologic procedures compared with transmasculine patients. Only 19 participants (2.8%) reported the use of dermal filler injections. CONCLUSION: Differences in utilization of dermatologic procedures were noted in transgender populations. Motivations, barriers, and optimal timing for gender-affirming dermatologic procedures among transgender persons should be examined in future studies.

An Australian tertiary hospital analysis of outpatient dermatology clinical and demographic characteristics.

OBJECTIVES: Literature on dermatology outpatient demographic and clinical data is limited, and the few studies on this topic are mainly conducted overseas, with medical systems and case mix different to Australia. This study presents demographic data relating to dermatology public outpatient referrals to a tertiary hospital in Brisbane, Australia, and determines what additional structured data should be collected to formulate and evaluate initiatives to address service issues such as referral quality, triage process and wait times. METHODS: A four-year retrospective audit was undertaken, summarising all referrals (n = 7140) and clinical dermatology encounters (n = 53 844) between January 2016 and December 2019 at Princess Alexandra Hospital (PAH), the largest hospital in Metro South Health (MSH), serving a population of one million. PAH has one of the two largest public dermatology clinics in Queensland and is the only dermatology service within MSH. RESULTS: Patient demographic data, wait time by triage category, referral rates over time and encounter durations were collected. Structured diagnostic data (e.g. ICD-10 coding) of the provisional diagnosis, comorbidities, medications and the final diagnosis are not collected in a structured format and would be a valuable addition. CONCLUSIONS: The clinical burden of public dermatology is increasing. Both collection and analysis of structured data pertaining to the referrals and encounters are important to help formulate, implement and evaluate initiatives that aim to improve health service provision in this area.

Impact of second-opinion dermatopathology reviews on surgical management of malignant neoplasms.

BACKGROUND: Second-opinion review is linked to error reduction and treatment changes in anatomic pathology. OBJECTIVE: We sought to establish the rate of diagnostic discrepancy identified by second-opinion dermatopathologic review and the effect on surgical treatment. METHODS: Cases referred for treatment of a malignant neoplasm diagnosed by an outside pathologist were reviewed. The external and internal second-opinion dermatopathologic reports were compared. Discordance in diagnosis, subtype, and treatment change owing to second-opinion review was recorded. The referring pathologist's level of dermatopathologic training was also documented. RESULTS: A total of 358 cases were included. Dermatopathologic second-opinion diagnosis was discordant with the outside diagnosis in 37 of 358 cases (10.3%). In 32 of 358 cases (8.9%), second-opinion review resulted in a change in treatment, with 28 of 32 (87.5%) of these changes resulting in cancelled surgery. Dermatologists without dermatopathologic fellowship training had the highest rate of discordant diagnoses compared with pathologists and dermatopathologists. LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study at a tertiary care facility. CONCLUSION: Second-opinion dermatopathologic review is associated with identification of discordant diagnoses and a substantial influence on treatment, with both cancellation of surgery and augmented management. Secondary pathologic review should be considered in high-volume surgical practices.

Risk Factors for Surgical Site Infection after Minor Dermatologic Surgery.

BACKGROUND: Surgical site infection (SSI) after dermatologic surgery is associated with poor outcomes including increased recovery time, poor cosmesis, and repeat visits to doctors. Prophylactic antibiotics are prescribed to reduce these adverse outcomes. Identifying risk factors for SSI will facilitate judicious antibiotic prophylaxis. OBJECTIVE: To identify risk factors for SSI after minor dermatologic surgery. METHODS: Individual patient data from four large randomized controlled trials were combined to increase statistical power. A total of 3,819 adult patients requiring minor skin procedures at a single facility were recruited over a 10-year period. The main outcome measure was SSI. MAIN RESULTS: A total of 298 infections occurred, resulting in an overall incidence of 7.8% (95% confidence interval [CI], 5.8-9.6), although the incidence varied across the four studies (P = .042). Significant risk factors identified were age (relative risk [RR], 1.01; 95% CI, 1.001-1.020; P = .008), excisions from the upper limbs (RR, 3.03; 95% CI, 1.76-5.22; P = .007) or lower limbs (RR, 3.99; 95% CI, 1.93-8.23; P = .009), and flap/two-layer procedures (RR, 3.23; 95% CI, 1.79-5.85; P = .008). Histology of the excised lesion was not a significant independent risk factor for infection. CONCLUSIONS: This study demonstrated that patients who were older, underwent complex excisions, or had excisions on an extremity were at higher risk of developing an SSI. An awareness of such risk factors will guide evidence-based and targeted antibiotic prophylaxis.

Narrow excision margins are appropriate for Merkel cell carcinoma when combined with adjuvant radiation: Analysis of 188 cases of localized disease and proposed management algorithm.

BACKGROUND: Merkel cell carcinoma (MCC) management typically includes surgery with or without adjuvant radiation therapy (aRT). Major challenges include determining surgical margin size and whether aRT is indicated. OBJECTIVE: To assess the association of aRT, surgical margin size, and MCC local recurrence. METHODS: Analysis of 188 MCC cases presenting without clinical nodal involvement. RESULTS: aRT-treated patients tended to have higher-risk tumors (larger diameter, positive microscopic margins, immunosuppression) yet had fewer local recurrences (LRs) than patients treated with surgery only (1% vs 15%; P = .001). For patients who underwent surgery alone, 7 of 35 (20%) treated with narrow margins (defined as ≤1.0 cm) developed LR, whereas 0 of 13 patients treated with surgical margins greater than 1.0 cm developed LR (P = .049). For aRT-treated patients, local control was excellent regardless of surgical margin size; only 1% experienced recurrence in each group (1 of 70 with narrow margins ≤1 cm and 1 of 70 with margins >1 cm; P = .56). LIMITATIONS: This was a retrospective study. CONCLUSIONS: Among patients treated with aRT, local control was superb even if significant risk factors were present and margins were narrow. We propose an algorithm for managing primary MCC that integrates risk factors and optimizes local control while minimizing morbidity.

Dermoscopic Findings in the Presurgical Evaluation of Basal Cell Carcinoma. A Prospective Study.

BACKGROUND: Surgery is the best treatment for basal cell carcinoma (BCC); however, incomplete excisions are possible. OBJECTIVE: Assessment of the accurateness of dermoscopy and clinical evaluation in the detection of borders of BCC and description of dermoscopic findings in clinically healthy tissue surrounding BCC. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-eight lesions with clinical dermoscopic diagnosis of BCC were examined clinically and dermoscopically, to delineate the correct site of surgical incision, demarcating the respective margins with colred dermographic pencils. Specific dermoscopic features were searched in the skin adjacent to the demarcated clinical margin. RESULTS: In 29 of 88 lesions, clinical and dermoscopic margins of the tumor coincided. In the remaining 59 (67%), 10 (16.9%) presented, in the lesion area identified under dermoscopy, classical criteria for BCC and 57 (96.6%) nonclassical criteria. Differences between clinical and dermoscopic margins were significantly more frequent in superficial BCCs (p = .006). The frequency was not significantly different (p = .85) in relation to body sites. CONCLUSION: Dermoscopy improves the identification of margins for surgical excision in BCC. The observation of nontraditional dermoscopic criteria of BCC, mainly pink-white areas and short telangiectasias in the area between clinically and dermoscopically detected margins, helps to define the actual tumoral margins and to achieve a really radical excision.

Medical and socioeconomic challenges of private dermatocosmetology clinics during COVID-19 pandemic: A survey from Turkey.

BACKGROUND: Coronavirus 2019 (COVID-19) disease has rapidly spread worldwide with a multitude effects on daily life. Since the transmission risk increases with close contact, some cosmetic procedures are considered high risk and majority of them had to be postponed or canceled in private dermatocosmetology clinics especially during the heavy period of the outbreak. AIMS: We aimed to document the medical and socioeconomic problems emerged in dermatocosmetology clinics in Turkey caused by COVID-19 pandemic and to discuss the management strategies taken by dermatologists. PATIENTS/METHODS: This survey research was conducted with 100 dermatologists who work in private dermatocosmetology clinics. The survey included 38 questions about office re-arrangements including patient admission and office environment, safety precautions taken for cosmetic procedures, management of clinic staff, and financial impact of the pandemic. RESULTS: A remarkable decrease in major cosmetic interest was reported in private clinics; meanwhile, there was an increase in applicants for noncosmetic dermatological complaints. The most avoided cosmetic procedures were application of skin care devices, lasers, chemical peeling, and thread lifting, while botulinum toxin injection was the most performed procedure. Nearly half of the participants had severe financial damage. Of the participants, 55% reported that they worked anxiously during this period and 60% believed that they managed the early period of the pandemic successfully. CONCLUSION: Private dermatocosmetology clinics have to work in a totally different period that they have never experienced before. The pandemic has had serious impacts on both medical and socioeconomic issues which had to be managed carefully.

Prediction of the invasive level of basal cell carcinomas in the facial area: Analysis of 718 Japanese cases.

BACKGROUND: Basal cell carcinoma (BCC) is the most common skin cancer. While Mohs micrographic surgery is commonly accepted for BCC treatment, surgical excision with free margins is widely considered the best treatment modality for BCCs in Japan. However, little is known about the predictors of the invasion levels of BCCs. OBJECTIVE: To investigate the optimization of deep surgical margins by identifying factors significantly influencing the invasion levels of facial BCCs. METHODS: The tumor invasion level was defined as the deepest part of a tumor. Tumor thickness was measured from the top of the granular layer to the deepest extension of the tumor or from the ulcer base overlying the deepest point of invasion in ulcerated lesions. Factors independently associated with tumor thickness and invasion level were identified by multivariate analysis. Six variables were tested: age, sex, anatomical region (nose, orbit, others), histologic pattern (aggressive, non-aggressive), presence of pigmentation, and diameter. RESULTS: We included 718 cases of facial BCCs involving 705 Japanese patients. The most frequent anatomical region and histologic pattern were the nose and nodular pattern, respectively. Only tumor diameter showed a correlation with tumor thickness (ß = 0.377, P < 0.001). Tumor diameter (AOR = 71.189, 95 % CI: 11.420-430.931, P = 0.01) and the following anatomical regions showed correlations with the invasion level: nose/others: AOR=2.769, 95 % CI: 1.235-6.493, P = 0.01; orbit/others: AOR=6.369, 95 % CI: 2.728-15.429, P < 0.001; orbit/nose: AOR=2.300, 95 % CI: 1.056-4.984, P = 0.04. CONCLUSIONS: This study serves as a guide for optimizing deep surgical margins and planning surgery for facial BCCs considering independently associated factors.

Delayed Diagnosis of Hidradenitis Suppurativa and Its Effect on Patients and Healthcare System.

BACKGROUND: Hidradenitis suppurativa (HS) is a neglected chronic inflammatory disease with long delay in diagnosis. Besides pain, purulent discharge, and destruction of skin architecture, HS patients experience metabolic, musculoskeletal, and psychological disorders. OBJECTIVES: To determine the delay in HS diagnosis and its consequences for patients and the healthcare system. METHODS: This was a prospective, multicenter, epidemiologic, non-interventional cross-sectional trial carried out in Germany and based on self-reported questionnaires and medical examinations performed by dermatologists. In total, data of 394 adult HS patients were evaluated. RESULTS: The average duration from manifestation of first symptoms until HS diagnosis was 10.0 ± 9.6 (mean ± SD) years. During this time, HS patients consulted on average more than 3 different physicians - most frequently general practitioners, dermatologists, surgeons, gynecologists - and faced more than 3 misdiagnoses. Diagnosis delay was longer in younger and non-smoking patients. In most cases, HS was correctly diagnosed by dermatologists. The longer the delay of diagnosis, the greater the disease severity at diagnosis. Delayed HS diagnosis was also associated with an increased number of surgically treated sites, concomitant diseases, and days of work missed. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates an enormous delay in the diagnosis of HS, which results in more severe disease. It also shows for the first time that a delay in diagnosis of a chronic inflammatory disease leads to a higher number of concomitant systemic disorders. In addition to the impaired health status, delayed diagnosis of HS was associated with impairment of the professional life of affected people.

Racial differences in time to treatment for melanoma.

BACKGROUND: Longer time from diagnosis to definitive surgery (TTDS) is associated with increased melanoma-specific mortality. Although black patients present with later-stage melanoma and have worse survival than non-Hispanic white patients, the association between race and TTDS is unknown. OBJECTIVE: To investigate racial differences in time to melanoma treatment. METHODS: Retrospective review of the National Cancer Database (2004-2015). Multivariable logistic regression was used to evaluate the association of race with TTDS, controlling for sociodemographic/disease characteristics. RESULTS: Of the 233,982 patients with melanoma identified, 1221 (0.52%) were black. Black patients had longer TTDS for stage I to III melanoma (P < .001) and time to immunotherapy (P = .01), but not for TTDS for stage IV melanoma or time to chemotherapy (P > .05 for both). When sociodemographic characteristics were controlled for, black patients had over twice the odds of having a TTDS between 41 and 60 days, over 3 times the odds of having a TTDS between 61 and 90 days, and over 5 times the odds of having a TTDS over 90 days. Racial differences in TTDS persisted within each insurance type. Patients with Medicaid had the longest TTDS (mean, 60.4 days), and those with private insurance had the shortest TTDS (mean, 44.6 days; P < .001 for both). CONCLUSIONS: Targeted approaches to improve TTDS for black patients are integral in reducing racial disparities in melanoma outcomes.