Implementing antimicrobial stewardship: lessons and perspectives from a university-affiliated tertiary hospital in Korea.

Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) can lower antibiotic use, decrease medical expenses, prevent the emergence of resistant bacteria, and enhance treatment for infectious diseases. This study summarizes the stepwise implementation and effects of ASPs in a single university-affiliated tertiary care hospital in Korea; it also presents future directions and challenges in resource-limited settings. At the study hospital, the core elements of the ASP such as leadership commitment, accountability, and operating system were established in 2000, then strengthened by the formation of the Antimicrobial Stewardship (AMS) Team in 2018. The actions of ASPs entail key components including a computerized restrictive antibiotic prescription system, prospective audit, post-prescription review through quantitative and qualitative intervention, and pharmacy-based interventions to optimize antibiotic usage. The AMS Team regularly tracked antibiotic use, the effects of interventions, and the resistance patterns of pathogens in the hospital. The reporting system was enhanced and standardized by participation in the Korea National Antimicrobial Use Analysis System, and educational efforts are ongoing. Stepwise implementation of the ASP and the efforts of the AMS Team have led to a substantial reduction in the overall consumption of antibiotics, particularly regarding injectables, and optimization of antibiotic use. Our experience highlights the importance of leadership, accountability, institution-specific interventions, and the AMS Team.

Principles and practices of antimicrobial stewardship programs in Korea.

This review addresses the escalating challenge posed by antibiotic resistance, highlighting its profound impact on global public health, including increased mortality rates and healthcare expenditures. The review focuses on the need to adopt the One Health approach to effectively manage antibiotic usage across human, animal, and environmental domains. Antimicrobial stewardship programs (ASPs) are considered as comprehensive strategies that encompass both core and supplementary initiatives aimed at enhancing prudent antibiotic use. The 2021 "Guidelines on Implementing ASP in Korea" introduced such strategies, with a strong emphasis on fostering multidisciplinary and collaborative efforts. Furthermore, the "Core Elements for Implementing ASPs in Korean General Hospitals," established in 2022, provide a structured framework for ASPs, delineating leadership responsibilities, the composition of interdisciplinary ASP teams, a range of interventions, and continuous monitoring and reporting mechanisms. In addition, this review examines patient-centric campaigns such as "Speak Up, Get Smart" and emphasizes the pivotal role of a multidisciplinary approach and international cooperation in addressing the multifaceted challenges associated with antibiotic resistance.

Evolución histórica de la Organización Mundial de la Salud y la resistencia a los antimicrobianos / Historical evolution of World Health Organization guidelines on antimicrobial resistance / Evolução histórica da Organização Mundial da Saúde e a resistência aos antimicrobianos

RESUMEN Objetivo. Mostrar la evolución de los lineamientos sobre políticas públicas en salud enfocadas en farmacorresistencia microbiana o resistencia a los antimicrobianos (RAM) que la Organización Mundial de la Salud (OMS) ha emitido desde 1948 hasta 2022. Además, se mencionan otras acciones gubernamentales relacionadas. Métodos. Se llevó a cabo una revisión detallada de los archivos de la Asamblea Mundial de la Salud y el Consejo Ejecutivo de la OMS. Se realizó un análisis textual de resoluciones sobre la RAM, que dan pauta al diseño de políticas y acciones gubernamentales para los Estados Miembros de la OMS. También se realizó una búsqueda sistemática en SCOPUS, Pubmed y literatura gris con categoría de análisis: políticas públicas en salud sobre la RAM. Resultados. La RAM se ha convertido en la mayor amenaza para la salud pública, y compromete el cumplimiento de los objetivos de desarrollo sostenible. Presentamos resoluciones de la OMS como evidencia de lineamientos para combatir la RAM. En consonancia, se menciona el enfoque "Una salud", estrategias, iniciativas, planes y programas relacionados. Se identificó una brecha en la investigación y el desarrollo de antimicrobianos nuevos, que requiere un análisis más profundo. Conclusiones. La OMS ha realizado esfuerzos para combatir la RAM. Esto ha generado un desarrollo integral de políticas públicas en salud, para que los Estados Miembros las apliquen según la soberanía de sus gobiernos.

ABSTRACT Objective. Show the evolution of guidelines on public health policies focused on antimicrobial resistance (AMR) issued by the World Health Organization (WHO) between 1948 and 2022. Other related government actions are also mentioned. Methods. A detailed review was conducted of World Health Assembly and WHO Executive Board archives. A textual analysis was conducted of AMR-related resolutions that guide the design of government policies and actions for WHO Member States. A systematic search was carried out in SCOPUS, PubMed, and grey literature under the category of public health policies on AMR. Results. AMR has become the greatest threat to public health, putting at risk the achievement of the Sustainable Development Goals. WHO resolutions are presented as evidence of guidelines to combat AMR. The One Health approach and related strategies, initiatives, plans, and programs are mentioned. A gap was identified in the research and development of new antimicrobials, requiring further analysis. Conclusions. WHO has made efforts to combat AMR. This has generated comprehensive development of public health policies to be implemented by the governments of Member States as they see fit.

RESUMO Objetivo. Apresentar a evolução das diretrizes sobre políticas públicas de saúde voltadas para a resistência microbiana a medicamentos ou resistência aos antimicrobianos (RAM) publicadas pela Organização Mundial da Saúde (OMS) de 1948 a 2022. Além disso, mencionam-se outras ações governamentais relacionadas. Métodos. Procedeu-se a uma revisão detalhada dos arquivos da Assembleia Mundial da Saúde e do Conselho Executivo da OMS. Realizou-se uma análise textual das resoluções sobre RAM, que orientam a formulação de políticas e ações governamentais para os Estados Membros da OMS. Fez-se também uma busca sistemática nas plataformas SCOPUS e Pubmed e na literatura cinzenta, com a categoria de análise "políticas públicas de saúde sobre RAM". Resultados. A RAM tornou-se a maior ameaça à saúde pública e prejudica o cumprimento dos Objetivos de Desenvolvimento Sustentável. Apresentamos as resoluções da OMS como evidência de diretrizes para combater a RAM. Nesses termos, mencionam-se a abordagem "Saúde Única" e estratégias, iniciativas, planos e programas relacionados. Identificou-se uma lacuna na pesquisa e no desenvolvimento de novos antimicrobianos, o que requer uma análise mais aprofundada. Conclusões. A OMS envidou esforços para combater a RAM, o que levou ao desenvolvimento integral de políticas públicas de saúde a serem aplicadas pelos Estados Membros, em conformidade com a soberania de seus governos.

Increasing Guideline-Concordant Durations of Antibiotic Therapy for Acute Otitis Media.

OBJECTIVE: To compare the effectiveness of 2 interventions in improving prescribing of guideline-concordant durations of therapy for acute otitis media (AOM). STUDY DESIGN: This was a quasi-experimental mixed methods analysis that compared a bundled quality improvement intervention consisting of individualized audit and feedback, education, and electronic health record (EHR) changes to an EHR-only intervention. The bundle was implemented in 3 pediatric clinics from January to August 2020 and an EHR-only intervention was implemented in 6 family medicine clinics. The primary outcome measure was prescription of an institutional guideline-concordant 5-day duration of therapy for children ≥2 years of age with uncomplicated AOM. Propensity score matching and differences-in-differences analysis weighted with inverse probability of treatment were completed. Implementation outcomes were assessed using the Reach, Effectiveness, Adoption, Implementation, Maintenance Framework. Balance measures included treatment failure and recurrence. RESULTS: In total, 1017 encounters for AOM were included from February 2019 to August 2020. Guideline-concordant prescribing increased from 14.4% to 63.8% (difference = 49.4%) in clinics that received the EHR-only intervention and from 10.6% to 85.2% (difference = 74.6%) in clinics that received the bundled intervention. In the adjusted analysis, the bundled intervention improved guideline-concordant durations by an additional 26.4% (P < .01) compared with the EHR-only intervention. Providers identified EHR-prescription field changes as the most helpful components. There were no differences in treatment failure or recurrence rates between baseline and either intervention. CONCLUSIONS: Both interventions resulted in improved prescribing of guideline-concordant durations of antibiotics. The bundled intervention improved prescribing more than an EHR-only intervention and was acceptable to providers.

Creation of State Antibiogram and Subsequent Launch of Public Health-Coordinated Antibiotic Stewardship in New Hampshire: Small State, Big Collaboration.

BACKGROUND: An antibiogram is a summary of antibiotic susceptibility patterns for selected bacterial pathogens and antibiotics. The New Hampshire Department of Health and Human Services' Division of Public Health Services (DPHS) sought to create an annual state antibiogram to monitor statewide antibiotic resistance trends, guide appropriate empiric antibiotic prescribing, and inform future statewide antibiotic stewardship. METHODS: Through legislative authority, DPHS required hospital laboratories to report antibiogram data annually. DPHS convened an advisory group of infectious disease and pharmacy stakeholders and experts to develop a standardized reporting form for bacteria and antibiotic susceptibility, which was disseminated to all 26 hospitals in New Hampshire. We combined the reported data into a statewide antibiogram, and we created clinical messaging to highlight findings and promote rational antibiotic prescribing among health care providers. RESULTS: All hospital laboratories in New Hampshire submitted annual antibiogram data for 2016 and 2017, including more than 30 000 and 20 000 bacterial isolates recovered from urine and nonurine cultures, respectively, each year. The advisory group created clinical messages for appropriate treatment of common infectious syndromes, including uncomplicated urinary tract infections, community-acquired pneumonia, skin and soft-tissue infections, intra-abdominal infections, and health care-associated gram-negative aerobic infections. The statewide antibiograms and clinical messaging were widely disseminated. CONCLUSIONS: The small size of New Hampshire, a centralized public health structure, and close working relationships with hospitals and clinical partners allowed for efficient creation and dissemination of an annual statewide antibiogram, which has fostered public health-clinical partnerships and built a foundation for future state-coordinated antibiotic stewardship. This process serves as a model for other jurisdictions that are considering antibiogram development.

Antimicrobial stewardship in the Western Cape: A situational analysis of existing facility-level initiatives.

BACKGROUND: Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing problem worldwide. With the current occurrence of pan-resistant bacterial infections and a paucity of novel antimicrobials in development, the world has entered a post-antibiotic era, in which previously treatable, common infections can become fatal. Antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), defined as 'co-ordinated interventions to ensure appropriate and rational use of antimicrobials', aims to decrease rates of AMR. OBJECTIVES: To co-ordinate AMS in Western Cape Province. The National Department of Health (NDoH) has identified AMS as a key strategic objective, and the Western Cape has formed a provincial AMS committee. However, not much is known regarding current AMS activities in health facilities in the province. METHODS: A self-administered, email questionnaire was sent to specific staff at all district, regional and tertiary hospitals in the 6 health districts of the Western Cape - 47 facilities in total, of which 35 (74.4%) responded. Respondents included pharmacists, managers, doctors, nurses, infection prevention and control practitioners, as well as quality assurance practitioners. The number of facilities implementing AMS were determined, as well as the composition of AMS committees and the nature and frequency of team activities. Barriers to facility-level AMS were explored. Support and outreach activities were assessed, as well as facilities' needs and expectations of the provincial AMS committee. RESULTS: Approximately half of all responding hospitals (n=19; 54.3%) had active AMS committees. Double the proportion of metropolitan (83.3%) than rural facilities (39.1%) had committees. Stewardship activities included antimicrobial prescription chart reviews and audits, AMS ward rounds, antimicrobial restriction policies and training. Most committees included a pharmacist and an infection prevention and control practitioner. More than a third of hospitals (36.1%) did not review their antimicrobial consumption data on a regular basis. Just over half of the hospitals (n=18; 51.4%) did not review AMR patterns. CONCLUSIONS: Despite the need for effective AMS, there is limited information on AMS in South Africa. Most assistance is required in rural areas and smaller hospitals with low numbers of staff and greater numbers of transient rotating junior staff. Information management support, multidisciplinary teamwork and clinical governance are required to enable regular and ongoing AMS in facilities. Rural and smaller facilities require greater support to establish effectively functioning AMS committees.

Changes in antibiotic consumption, AMR and Clostridioides difficile infections in a large tertiary-care center following the implementation of institution-specific guidelines for antimicrobial therapy: A nine-year interrupted time series study.

BACKGROUND: Institution-specific guidelines (ISGs) within the framework of antimicrobial stewardship programs offer locally tailored decision support taking into account local pathogen and resistance epidemiology as well as national and international guidelines. OBJECTIVES: To assess the impact of ISGs for antimicrobial therapy on antibiotic consumption and subsequent changes in resistance rates and Clostridioides difficile infections (CDIs). METHODS: The study was conducted at the Leipzig University Hospital, a 1,451-bed tertiary-care medical center, and covered the years 2012 to 2020. Since 2014, ISGs were provided to optimize empirical therapies, appropriate diagnostics, and antimicrobial prophylaxis. We used interrupted time series analysis (ITSA) and simple linear regression to analyze changes in antimicrobial consumption, resistance and CDIs. RESULTS: Over the study period, 1,672,200 defined daily doses (DDD) of antibiotics were dispensed, and 85,645 bacterial isolates as well as 2,576 positive C. difficile cultures were collected. Total antimicrobial consumption decreased by 14% from 2012 to 2020, without clear impact of the deployment of ISGs. However, implementation of ISGs was associated with significant decreases in the use of substances that were rarely recommended (e.g., fluoroquinolones). Over the whole study period, we observed declining resistance rates to most antibiotic classes of up to 25% in Enterobacterales, staphylococci, and Pseudomonas aeruginosa. Switching from ceftriaxone to cefotaxime was associated with reduced resistance to third-generation cephalosporins. The number of CDI cases fell by 65%, from 501 in 2012 to 174 in 2020. CONCLUSIONS: Well-implemented ISGs can have a significant, immediate, and lasting impact on the prescription behavior. ISGs might thereby contribute to reduce resistance rates and CDI incidences in the hospital setting.

Evaluating Initial Empiric Therapy for Neutropenic Fever in Vancomycin-Resistant Enterococcus-Colonized Patients.

OBJECTIVES: Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus infections impact mortality in oncology patients. Given the low rate of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus bacteremia, low virulence of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus, and advent of rapid diagnostic systems, vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-directed empiric therapy in vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-colonized patients with neutropenic fever may be unnecessary, promoting increased antimicrobial resistance, drug-related toxicity, and cost. METHODS: Vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-colonized adults admitted for hematopoietic stem cell transplantation or induction therapy for acute leukemia/myeloid sarcoma with neutropenic fever were stratified by vancomycin-resistant enterococcus bacteremia development and empiric vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-directed antimicrobial strategy for first neutropenic fever (Empiric Therapy vs. non-Empiric Therapy). Primary endpoints included vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-related, in-hospital, and 100-day mortality rates. Secondary outcomes included vancomycin-resistant enterococcus bacteremia incidence for first neutropenic fever and the entire hospitalization, length of stay, Clostridioides difficile infection rate, and duration and cost of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-directed therapy. RESULTS: During first neutropenic fever, 3 of 70 eligible patients (4%) developed vancomycin-resistant enterococcus bacteremia. Although all 3 (100%) were non-Empiric Therapy, no mortality (0%) occurred. Of 67 patients not developing vancomycin-resistant enterococcus bacteremia, 42 (63%) received Empiric Therapy and 25 (37%) non-Empiric Therapy. Empiric Therapy had significantly greater median duration (3 days vs. 0 days; P<.001) and cost ($1604 vs. $0; P<.001) of vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-directed therapy but demonstrated no significant differences in clinical outcomes. CONCLUSION: Available data suggest Empiric Therapy may offer no clinical benefit to this population, regardless of whether vancomycin-resistant enterococcus is identified in blood culture or no pathogen is found. Such an approach may only expose the majority of patients to unnecessary vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-directed therapy and drug-related toxicities while increasing institutional drug and monitoring costs. Even in the few patients developing vancomycin-resistant enterococcus bacteremia, waiting until the organism is identified in culture to start directed therapy likely makes no difference in mortality. This lack of benefit warrants consideration to potentially omit empiric vancomycin-resistant enterococcus-directed therapy in first neutropenic fever in many of these patients.

Antimicrobial stewardship in the ICU in COVID-19 times: the known unknowns.

Since the start of the COVID-19 pandemic, there has been concern about the concomitant rise of antimicrobial resistance. While bacterial co-infections seem rare in COVID-19 patients admitted to hospital wards and intensive care units (ICUs), an increase in empirical antibiotic use has been described. In the ICU setting, where antibiotics are already abundantly-and often inappropriately-prescribed, the need for an ICU-specific antimicrobial stewardship programme is widely advocated. Apart from essentially warning against the use of antibacterial drugs for the treatment of a viral infection, other aspects of ICU antimicrobial stewardship need to be considered in view of the clinical course and characteristics of COVID-19. First, the distinction between infectious and non-infectious (inflammatory) causes of respiratory deterioration during an ICU stay is difficult, and the much-debated relevance of fungal and viral co-infections adds to the complexity of empirical antimicrobial prescribing. Biomarkers such as procalcitonin for the decision to start antibacterial therapy for ICU nosocomial infections seem to be more promising in COVID-19 than non-COVID-19 patients. In COVID-19 patients, cytomegalovirus reactivation is an important factor to consider when assessing patients infected with SARS-CoV-2 as it may have a role in modulating the patient immune response. The diagnosis of COVID-19-associated invasive aspergillosis is challenging because of the lack of sensitivity and specificity of the available tests. Furthermore, altered pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic properties need to be taken into account when prescribing antimicrobial therapy. Future research should now further explore the 'known unknowns', ideally with robust prospective study designs.

Successfully controlling the incidence of multidrug-resistant Pseudomonas aeruginosa through antibiotic stewardship and infection control programmes at a Chinese university hospital.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to investigate the effect of imposing infection control programmes (ICPs) and antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) by monitoring the antimicrobial resistance of Pseudomonas aeruginosa. METHODS: Antimicrobial susceptibility testing was performed in accordance with the Clinical and Laboratory Standards Institute and European Committee on Antimicrobial Susceptibility Testing guidelines. ICPs and AMS were initiated at the Fourth Hospital from 2013 to 2018. RESULTS AND DISCUSSION: A total of 2,886 P. aeruginosa isolates were assessed. The antimicrobial resistance trends of the P. aeruginosa strains improved after the intervention measures. Multidrug-resistant (MDR) and extensively drug-resistant (XDR) P. aeruginosa contributed to 18.5% and 3.5% of the total P. aeruginosa strains, respectively. Colistin was the most effective antibiotic against 97.6% of XDR-P. aeruginosa and 99.41% of MDR-P. aeruginosa. The consumption of alcohol-based hand gel (ABHG) increased from 0.6 L to 10.8 L per 1,000 patient-days (PD) (p = 0.005). The yearly consumption of antibiotics decreased from 45 to 37.5 defined daily doses (DDD) per 1,000 PD(p = 0.04). After 2013, the incidence rate of MDR-P. aeruginosa showed a significant decrease from 22% to 14.1% (p = 0.04), and XDR-P. aeruginosa decreased from 5.8% to 0.9%. The use of ABHG was negatively related to MDR-P. aeruginosa morbidity (r = -0.86; p = 0.021). The consumption of antibiotics was positively related to MDR-P. aeruginosa morbidity (r = 0.86; p = 0.021). WHAT IS NEW AND CONCLUSION: Successful control of MDR-P. aeruginosa resistance was achieved by imposing comprehensive ICPs and AMS.

Impact and barriers of a pharmacist-led practice with computerized reminders on intravenous to oral antibiotic conversion for community-acquired pneumonia inpatients.

WHAT IS KNOWN AND OBJECTIVE: Intravenous to oral (IV-PO) antibiotic conversion, one of the critical elements in antimicrobial stewardship (AMS), is not well implemented in China. Studies on the strategy to apply the IV-PO conversion are needed. Our objective was to evaluate the impact and its barriers of a pharmacist-led practice with computerized reminders on IV-PO antibiotic conversion for community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) inpatients. METHOD: This was a retrospective, observational pre- and post-intervention study. Interventions were introduced in 2 sequential 12-month phases: Phase 1: pharmacists implemented the conventional practice of reviewing patient charts and medication records every 24 h and verbally informed the prescribers on eligible IV-PO conversions; Phase 2: pharmacists implemented a new intervention practice to inform the prescribers with a computerized reminder in electronic medical record system on eligible IV-PO conversions. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: The primary outcome was the proportion of patients who converted to oral therapy on the day patients were eligible for the conversion. The secondary outcomes were length of IV antibiotic therapy days, total length of antibiotic therapy days and length of hospital stay. RESULTS: A total of 524 patients were studied (256 in phase 1 and 268 in phase 2). The proportion of patients who converted to oral therapy on the day patients were eligible for the conversion was significantly increased from 34.77% (89/256) in phase 1 to 62.69% (168/268) in phase 2 (p < 0.05). Length of IV antibiotic therapy days in phase 2 was shortened by 1.23 days, which was 5.52 days compared to 6.75 days in phase 1 (p < 0.05). Total length of antibiotic therapy days was 12.05 days in Phase 1, compared to 10.75 days in phase 2 (p > 0.05). Length of hospital stay for patients in phase 2 was significantly shorter, with a difference of 1.38 days (6.02 days vs. 7.40 days, p < 0.05). The most common barrier of not converting IV-PO was the presence of co-morbidity. CONCLUSION: The pharmacist-led IV-PO antibiotic conversion practice with computerized reminders was successful and feasible in Chinese hospitals. More IV-PO intervention studies in patients with other infections are needed in the future.

Where to from here? Identifying and prioritising future directions for addressing drug-resistant infection in Australia.

BACKGROUND: The Australian National Antimicrobial Resistance Strategy calls for a collaborative effort to change practices that have contributed to the development of drug-resistance and for implementation of new initiatives to reduce antibiotic use. METHODS: A facilitated workshop was undertaken at the 2019 National Australian Antimicrobial Resistance Forum to explore the complexity of antimicrobial stewardship (AMS) implementation in Australia and prioritise future action. Participants engaged in rotating rounds of discussion using a world café format addressing six topics relating to AMS implementation. Once all tables had discussed all themes the discussion concluded and notes were summarised. The documents were independently openly coded by two researchers to identify elements relating to the implementation of antimicrobial stewardship. RESULTS: There were 39 participants in the facilitated discussions, including pharmacists, infectious disease physicians, infection prevention nurses, and others. Participants discussed strategies they had found successful, including having a regular presence in clinical areas, adapting messaging and implementation strategies for different disciplines, maintaining positivity, and being patient-focused. Many of the recommendations for the next step involved being patient focussed and outcomesdriven. This involves linking data to practice, using patient stories, using data to celebrate wins and creating incentives. DISCUSSION: Recommendations from the workshop should be included in priority setting for the implementation of AMS initiatives across Australia.

Assessment of implementation of antibiotic stewardship program in surgical prophylaxis at a secondary care hospital in Ras Al Khaimah, United Arab Emirates.

Antibiotic overuse is a major factor for causing antibiotic resistance globally. However, only few studies reported the implementation and evaluation of antimicrobial stewardship programs in Gulf Cooperation Council. This study was conducted within 8-months periods to evaluate the effect of the newly implemented antibiotic stewardship program on improving the prescribing practice of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis in a secondary care hospital in the United Arab Emirates by releasing local hospital guidelines. The data of 493 in patients were documented in the predesigned patient profile form and the prescribing practice of surgical antibiotic prophylaxis for clean and clean-contaminant surgical procedures was compared and analyzed two months' prior (period A) and post (period B) the implementation of antibiotic stewardship program. The 347 patient's data (PD) were analyzed during period A and 146 PD during period B. The prescription of piperacillin/tazobactam was decreased from 2.4% from all surgical prophylaxis antibiotic orders in period A to 0% in period B. The appropriateness of the antibiotic therapy was found to differ non significantly for the selection of prophylactic antibiotic (p = 0.552) and for the timing of first dose administration (p = 0.061) between A and B periods. The total compliance was decreased non significantly (P = 0.08) from 45.3 to 40.2%. Overall, the guidelines have improved the prescribing practice of antibiotics prior to surgery. However, further improvement can be achieved by initiating educational intervention via cyclic auditing strategy.

Evaluating an antimicrobial stewardship programme implemented in an intensive care unit of a large academic hospital, using the RE-AIM framework.

BACKGROUND: The threat of antimicrobial resistance driven by inappropriate and unnecessary use of antimicrobials is a global issue of great concern. Evidence-based approaches to optimising antimicrobial prescribing to improve patient care while reducing the rate of antimicrobial resistance continue to be implemented worldwide. However, the successes or failures of implementation of such approaches are seldom evaluated. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the impact of an implemented antimicrobial stewardship programme (ASP) in reducing the spread of antimicrobial resistance in the intensive care unit (ICU) of a large academic hospital using the RE-AIM framework. METHODS: A descriptive quasi-experimental study was conducted with adult patients who had been admitted to the ICU of an academic hospital in Johannesburg, South Africa. Data were extracted from patients' records using a structured questionnaire. Descriptive statistics of four RE-AIM dimensions (reach, effectiveness, adoption and implementation) and the overall impact of the implemented antimicrobial stewardship programme were calculated. RESULTS: From the 59 participant records, 21 patients (35.6%) developed hospital-acquired infections and all were prescribed antimicrobials during their stay in the ICU. Twenty-seven pathogens (bacterial species) were isolated from samples acquired from the patients, including Staphylococcus aureus (n=6; 22.2%), Escherichia coli (n=4; 14.8%), Acinetobacter baumannii (n=4; 14.8%) and Streptococcus pnuemoniae (n=3; 11.11%), as well as 10 other bacterial species (37.0%) including Corynebacterium species, Enterococcus faecium, Haemophilus influenzae, Klebsiella species, Clostridium difficile and Salmonella species. Of the 27 pathogens isolated, 19 (70.4 %) were resistant to the prescribed antimicrobials. The overall impact of the ASP implemented in the studied facility was 67.2%. CONCLUSIONS: An ASP requires both thorough implementation and leadership support to have an impact in the reduction of antimicrobial resistance. Lack of leadership support poses a significant challenge to sustainability. There is an urgent need for behavioural change in hospital leadership.

Long-Term Sustainability and Acceptance of Antimicrobial Stewardship in Intensive Care: A Retrospective Cohort Study.

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate long-term uptake of an antimicrobial stewardship audit-and-feedback program along with potential predictors of stewardship suggestions and acceptance across a diverse ICU population. DESIGN: A retrospective cohort study. SETTING: An urban, academic medical institution. PATIENTS: Patients admitted to an ICU who received an antimicrobial stewardship program suggestion between June 2010 and September 2019. INTERVENTION: None. MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS: The antimicrobial stewardship program provided 7,749 antibiotic assessments over the study period and made a suggestion to alter therapy in 2,826 (36%). Factors associated with a higher likelihood of receiving a suggestion to alter therapy included shorter hospital length of stay prior to antimicrobial stewardship program review (odds ratio 1.15 for ≤ 5 d; 95% CI 1.00-1.32), admission to cardiovascular (1.37; 1.06-1.76) or burn surgery (1.88; 1.50-2.36) versus general medicine, and preceding duration of antibiotic use greater than 5 days (1.33; 1.10-1.60). Assessment of aminoglycosides (2.91; 1.85-4.89), carbapenems (1.93; 1.54-2.41), and vancomycin (2.71; 2.19-3.36) versus ceftriaxone was more likely to result in suggestions to alter therapy. The suggestion acceptance rate was 67% (1,895/2,826), which was stable throughout the study period. Admission to a level 3 ICU was associated with higher likelihood of acceptance of suggestions (1.50; 1.14-1.97). Factors associated with lower acceptance rates were admission to burn surgery (0.64; 0.45-0.91), treatment of pneumonia (0.64; 0.42-0.97 for community-acquired and 0.65; 0.44-0.94 for ventilator-acquired), unknown source of infection (0.66; 0.48-0.92), and suggestion types of "narrow spectrum" (0.65; 0.45-0.94), "change formulation of antibiotic" (0.42; 0.27-0.64), or "change agent of therapy" (0.63; 0.40-0.97) versus "change of dose". CONCLUSIONS: An antimicrobial stewardship program implemented over a decade resulted in sustained suggestion and acceptance rates. These findings support the need for a persistent presence of audit-and-feedback over time with more frequent suggestions to alter potentially nephrotoxic agents, increased efforts toward specialized care units, and further work approaching infectious sources that are typically treated without pathogen confirmation and identification.

Compliance with South Africa's Antimicrobial Resistance National Strategy Framework: are we there yet?

Antimicrobial resistance (AMR) is a growing problem worldwide. South Africa has recently released its Antimicrobial Resistance National Strategy Framework (referred to as the Framework) to instigate antimicrobial stewardship programmes (ASPs). Consequently, there is a need to assess compliance with the Framework. METHODS: Descriptive study design, collecting quantitative data, among pre-selected public healthcare facilities. One healthcare professional from each participating facility, involved in ASPs, was invited to participate. RESULTS: Overall 26 facilities from 8 provinces participated. Average compliance to the Framework was 59.5% for the 26 facilities, with 38.0% for community health centres, 66.9% for referral hospitals and 73.5% for national central hospitals. For 7 facilities compliance was <50% while 5 facilities were >80% compliant. CONCLUSION: Although some facilities complied well with the Framework, overall compliance was sub-optimal. With the introduction of universal healthcare in South Africa, coupled with growing AMR rates, ongoing initiatives to actively implement the Framework should be targeted at non-compliant facilities.

Optimal vancomycin dose in the treatment of Clostridium difficile infection, antimicrobial stewardship initiative.

C. difficile infections (CDI) are increasingly recognized as a leading cause of infectious diarrhea, with increasing morbidity and mortality. Treatment primarily centers around oral vancomycin treatment. A wide range of dosing regimens exist in clinical practice, with little evidence to help distinguish the therapeutic benefit between them. This is a retrospective cohort study conducted at an academic medical center that enrolled adult patients admitted with CDI. The primary outcome was a composite of complete or partial cure at the end of treatment and was assessed using a test of equivalency with a 20% equivalency limit. Subjects were divided into low dose (125 mg) or high dose (250 mg or 500 mg) of oral vancomycin dosed every 6 hours. Overall, 78 patients were included who received low dose vancomycin and 33 who received high dose. Generally, the two groups were similar, except the low dose group had significantly more leukocytosis and less ICU admission or hypotension compared to the high dose group. Equivalency between the two treatment groups was demonstrated (Absolute Risk Difference -0.022, 90% confidence interval: -0.13 to 0.18, p = 0.03). A stepwise logistic regression identified gender, baseline albumin, and ICU admission as significant predictors of the chance for complete or partial cure. No differences between groups for the secondary outcomes of 90-day readmission/recurrence, 30-day all-cause mortality, or time to resolution of diarrhea were demonstrated. Low dose oral vancomycin was demonstrated to result in equivalent outcomes compared to high dose vancomycin for the treatment of CDI.