RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Studies have found that the use of clinically approved caffeine and modafinil can alleviate cognitive impairment due to sleep deprivation (SD) to some extent. However, the neural mechanisms by which these two cognitive enhancers work to counteract the effects of SD on cognitive impairment remain unclear. METHODS: A double-blind within-subjects experiment using resting-state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) was designed. Participants underwent three 36-h SD trials, each of which involved taking 200 mg of caffeine, modafinil, or placebo at the 28th and 32 nd h of SD. Sixteen subregions of the thalamus were selected as the regions of interest and changes in functional connectivity (FC) between the thalamus and the other brain regions were explored after the participants took caffeine or modafinil. RESULTS: The subjective sleepiness of the participants increased with the duration of SD. compared with placebo, modafinil and caffeine had insignificant effects on wakefulness or sleepiness. However, in terms of neural FC, we found varying degrees of attenuation or enhancement of the FC between the thalamus and other regions. Taking caffeine during SD weakened the FC between the right rostral temporal thalamus (rTtha) subregion and the left lingual gyrus compared with placebo. Caffeine enhanced the FC between three subregions of the thalamus, namely the left sensory thalamus, the left rTtha, and the right lateral pre-frontal thalamus, and the right inferior temporal, left orbitofrontal, and right superior occipital gyris. Modafinil weakened the FC between the right posterior parietal thalamus and left middle temporal gyrus, and enhanced the FC between the left medial pre-frontal thalamus, left rTtha, and right occipital thalamus and left middle frontal gyrus. CONCLUSIONS: After 36 h of total SD, modafinil and caffeine administration enhanced or attenuated the time-domain correlations between various subregions of the thalamus and brain regions of the frontal and temporal lobes in healthy adults, compared with placebo. These results provide valuable evidence for further unraveling the neuropharmacological mechanisms of caffeine and modafinil, as well as important insights for exploring effective pharmacological intervention strategies against SD.
Asunto(s)
Cafeína , Imagen por Resonancia Magnética , Modafinilo , Privación de Sueño , Tálamo , Humanos , Cafeína/farmacología , Cafeína/administración & dosificación , Cafeína/uso terapéutico , Modafinilo/farmacología , Modafinilo/uso terapéutico , Privación de Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Privación de Sueño/complicaciones , Privación de Sueño/fisiopatología , Método Doble Ciego , Tálamo/efectos de los fármacos , Tálamo/diagnóstico por imagen , Masculino , Proyectos Piloto , Adulto , Femenino , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/farmacología , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , Promotores de la Vigilia/farmacología , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a debilitating neurological condition affecting nearly one million people across the United States. Among the most prominent symptoms of the condition are excessive fatigue and daytime sleepiness. Numerous clinical trials have investigated the efficacy of modafinil in addressing fatigue among these patients. OBJECTIVE: The objective of the present study is to assess the safety and efficacy of modafinil for the treatment of fatigue in MS. METHODOLOGY: An electronic search of PUBMED, ScienceDirect, and Cochrane Central was conducted for articles published from inception to December 2023 using search terms such as "modafinil," "fatigue," and "MS." RESULTS: Seven studies were included in our analysis. Modafinil leads to a meaningful reduction in fatigue when compared with placebo, as measured by Modified Fatigue Impact Scale [mean difference (MD) = -4.42 [-8.01, -.84]; I2 = 45%; p = .02] and Epworth Sleepiness Scale [MD = -.87 [-1.64, -.10]; I2 = 0%; p = .03]. Modafinil also demonstrated a greater risk of precipitating adverse events (e.g., insomnia, gastrointestinal symptoms) when compared with placebo [RR = 1.30 [1.03, 1.66]; I2 = 0%; p = .03]. In quality-of-life assessments, modafinil was associated with overall improvement in well-being [standardized mean difference = .18 [.01, .35]; I2 = 56%; p = .04]. CONCLUSION: The data indicates that modafinil confers a therapeutic benefit when treating fatigue in patients with MS and improves overall quality of life; however, there is a risk of precipitating adverse events. Ultimately, higher quality of evidence may be required to better inform clinical management.
Asunto(s)
Fatiga , Modafinilo , Esclerosis Múltiple , Modafinilo/uso terapéutico , Modafinilo/efectos adversos , Modafinilo/farmacología , Humanos , Esclerosis Múltiple/tratamiento farmacológico , Esclerosis Múltiple/complicaciones , Fatiga/tratamiento farmacológico , Fatiga/etiología , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéutico , Promotores de la Vigilia/efectos adversos , Promotores de la Vigilia/farmacología , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados como AsuntoAsunto(s)
Modafinilo , Isquemia Miocárdica , Humanos , Modafinilo/uso terapéutico , Isquemia Miocárdica/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Electrocardiografía , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/uso terapéutico , Persona de Mediana Edad , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéutico , Promotores de la Vigilia/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Trastorno Depresivo Mayor , Modafinilo , Humanos , Trastorno Depresivo Mayor/tratamiento farmacológico , Modafinilo/uso terapéutico , Modafinilo/farmacología , Adolescente , Masculino , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/efectos adversos , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/farmacologíaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: The efficacy of non-pharmacotherapeutic treatment of obstructive sleep apnea, a highly prevalent condition with serious cardiometabolic and neurocognitive health consequences, is well established. Supplementing traditional treatment strategies with medications can improve symptoms and reduce side effects. Efforts to identify medications that target the causes of sleep apnea have met with mixed success. However, this remains a worthwhile objective for researchers to pursue, given the potential benefit pharmacotherapy could bring to those patients who reject or struggle to adhere to existing treatments. AREAS COVERED: This article presents the case for obstructive sleep apnea pharmacotherapy including drugs that reduce the occurrence of apnea events, such as weight loss agents, ventilation activators and muscle and nervous system stimulants, drugs that alleviate symptoms, such as wake-promoting agents for excessive daytime sleepiness, and drugs that improve adherence to existing treatments, such as hypnotics. Literature was accessed from PubMed between 1 March 2024 and 18 April 2024. EXPERT OPINION: Exciting recent advances in both our understanding of obstructive sleep apnea pathology and in the techniques used to identify therapeutic agents and their targets combine to embolden a positive outlook for the expanded use of drugs in tackling this consequential disease.
Asunto(s)
Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Humanos , Cumplimiento de la Medicación , Hipnóticos y Sedantes/uso terapéutico , Animales , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Modafinil is used as a countermeasure to limit the effects of fatigue in military aviation. However, literature is conflicting about its negative effects on subsequent sleep.METHODS: This randomized placebo-controlled trial conducted by the Center of Man in Aviation of the Royal Netherlands Airforce is part of a larger study. It included 32 subjects (mean age 35 yr old, 84% male) who followed a normal daily routine and stayed awake the subsequent night. At midnight, all subjects received either 300 mg caffeine, 200 mg modafinil, or placebo. At the end of the test night, subjects were awake for a median period of 26 h. Afterwards, sleep questionnaires containing qualitative (Groningen Sleep Quality Scale) and quantitative parameters of sleep for the subsequent day (recovery sleep) and consecutive night (post-test sleep) were completed and statistically analyzed using Friedman and Wilcoxon signed rank tests.RESULTS: A statistically significant difference in the reported recovery sleep was observed. The modafinil group slept 30% shorter than placebo, but sleep efficiency was not statistically different. Quantitatively post-test sleep did not vary statistically significantly between the three groups. However, Groningen Sleep Quality Scale scores were lower post-test than pre-test in the modafinil group, while this was not the case in the caffeine and placebo group.DISCUSSION:This study found that modafinil subjectively does not negatively impact recovery sleep or subsequent nighttime sleep after an extended period of wakefulness and suggests it may decrease the need for recovery sleep compared to placebo or caffeine.Wingelaar-Jagt YQ, Wingelaar TT, Riedel WJ, Ramaekers JG. Modafinil subjectively does not impair sleep in aviators after a period of extended wakefulness. Aerosp Med Hum Perform. 2024; 95(6):290-296.
Asunto(s)
Cafeína , Modafinilo , Promotores de la Vigilia , Vigilia , Humanos , Masculino , Adulto , Vigilia/efectos de los fármacos , Vigilia/fisiología , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéutico , Cafeína/administración & dosificación , Femenino , Personal Militar , Sueño/efectos de los fármacos , Sueño/fisiología , Método Doble Ciego , Pilotos , Medicina Aeroespacial , Calidad del Sueño , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/uso terapéutico , Fatiga/tratamiento farmacológico , Fatiga/fisiopatologíaRESUMEN
Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is associated with excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS). Pharmacotherapy offers a potential treatment approach for EDS in OSA patients. This systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to assess the efficacy and safety of pharmacological interventions for alleviating EDS in patients with OSA. Following PRISMA guidelines, we included randomized controlled trials investigating pharmacological treatments for EDS in adult OSA until August 2023. We conducted meta-analysis, subgroup, and meta-regression analyses using a random effects model. Finally, a network meta-analysis synthesized direct and indirect evidence, followed by a comprehensive safety analysis. We included 32 articles in the meta-analysis (n = 3357). Pharmacotherapy showed a significant improvement in the Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS) score (Mean Difference (MD) -2.73, (95 % Confidence Interval (CI) [-3.25, -2.20], p < 0.01) and Maintenance of Wakefulness Test (MWT) score (MD 6.00 (95 % CI [2.66, 9.33] p < 0.01). Solriamfetol, followed by Pitolisant and modafinil, exhibited the greatest ESS reduction, while Danavorexton, followed by Solriamfetol and MK-7288, had the strongest impact on MWT. MK-7288 had the most total adverse events (AEs), followed by Danavorexton and armodafinil. Pharmacological Interventions significantly alleviate EDS in OSA patients but with heterogeneity across medications. Treatment decisions should involve a personalized assessment of patient factors and desired outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva , Modafinilo , Metaanálisis en Red , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Humanos , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológico , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Modafinilo/uso terapéutico , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéutico , Fenilpropionatos/uso terapéutico , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Carbamatos , Fenilalanina/análogos & derivados , PiperidinasRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Patients with narcolepsy often experience disturbed nighttime sleep. Modafinil is commonly prescribed for hypersomnolence, but its impacts on nocturnal sleep remain unclear. This study uses actigraphy to examine the effect of modafinil on both hypersomnolence and nocturnal sleep patterns in patients with narcolepsy. METHODS: Prior to treatment, 87 patients with narcolepsy wore an actigraphy for 7-14 days to assess their nighttime sleep. After evaluation, they received a daily dose of 200-400 mg of modafinil in the morning and wore an actigraphy again six months after initiating treatment. Questionnaires, including the Epworth-Sleepiness-Scale (ESS), the Visual-Analogue-for-Hypersomnolence (VAS), and the Short-Form-36-Health-Survey (SF-36), were used to evaluate hypersomnolence and quality of life both before and after treatment. Paired t-tests and independent samples t-tests were used for pre- and post-treatment comparisons and subgroup analysis. We used the Pearson's correlation test to measure the correlations between the sleep parameters of the actigraphy and data of the questionnaires. RESULTS: Improvements in hypersomnolence were noted following modafinil treatment, and we observed no significant deterioration in nocturnal sleep parameters by the actigraphy. The total number of awakenings by actigraphy significantly decreased (p = 0.005), especially in females (p = 0.008), while sleep onset latency significantly increased in children/adolescents (p = 0.014). Correlations were found between the sleep parameters of the actigraphy and ESS, VAS, and SF-36 scores. CONCLUSION: Modafinil treatment may not worsen nighttime sleep in patients with narcolepsy. However, it should be administered with care in children and adolescents.
Asunto(s)
Actigrafía , Compuestos de Bencidrilo , Modafinilo , Narcolepsia , Calidad de Vida , Promotores de la Vigilia , Humanos , Modafinilo/uso terapéutico , Modafinilo/farmacología , Narcolepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Masculino , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/farmacología , Adulto , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéutico , Promotores de la Vigilia/farmacología , Adolescente , Estudios de Cohortes , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Persona de Mediana Edad , Adulto Joven , Sueño/efectos de los fármacos , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/farmacología , Niño , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
About 20% of adults experience excessive daytime sleepiness or severe fatigue. Causes include somatic conditions, psychiatric disorders, and medication or drug use. Treatment depends on the underlying cause. If sleepiness persists despite optimal treatment of the underlying condition, exclusion of other causes, and behavioral interventions, wakefulness-promoting agents may be considered. However, no established pharmacological strategy exists for symptomatic treatment. Modafinil and stimulants like methylphenidate may offer some benefit based on experiences with narcolepsy or idiopathic hypersomnia. Studies in specific patient groups (e.g., multiple sclerosis, Parkinson's disease, traumatic brain injury, cancer-related fatigue) show variable results. The use of wakefulness-promoting agents is discouraged for addressing unexplained fatigue, as seen in the context of chronic fatigue syndrome.
Asunto(s)
Lesiones Traumáticas del Encéfalo , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central , Promotores de la Vigilia , Adulto , Humanos , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéutico , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , Modafinilo/uso terapéutico , Terapia ConductistaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Armodafinil is a psychostimulant that promotes alertness, and it has been shown to improve attention, memory, and fatigue in healthy adults and adults with neurodevelopmental conditions that share symptoms with Attention Deficit Hyperactivity Disorder (ADHD). It is generally well tolerated and safe, and most of the adverse events reported are considered not serious. However, the available evidence on the efficacy of armodafinil for the treatment of ADHD in adults is scarce. OBJECTIVE: The present review aims to perform a systematized search of the available evidence on the possible therapeutic benefit of armodafinil treatment in adult patients with ADHD. METHODS: A literature review using PubMed was conducted to compile and summarize the available clinical and scientific evidence on the possible use of armodafinil as a pharmacological treatment in adult patients with ADHD. RESULTS: From the 86 articles reviewed, the available evidence showed that both acute and chronic treatment with armodafinil can improve wakefulness, memory, impulse control, and executive functions in adults with sleep disorders and other conditions. In addition, evidence of improvement in cognitive functions and mood alterations in other neuropsychiatric conditions was shown. CONCLUSION: Armodafinil could be useful for the treatment of ADHD in adults, according to the review of the literature from both pre-clinical and clinical studies.
Asunto(s)
Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad , Modafinilo , Humanos , Modafinilo/uso terapéutico , Modafinilo/farmacología , Trastorno por Déficit de Atención con Hiperactividad/tratamiento farmacológico , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéutico , Promotores de la Vigilia/farmacología , Adulto , Animales , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/farmacología , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/uso terapéutico , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/farmacologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Disorders of consciousness impair early recovery after aneurysmal subarachnoid hemorrhage (aSAH). Modafinil, a wakefulness-promoting agent, is efficacious for treating fatigue in stroke survivors, but data pertaining to its use in the acute setting are scarce. This study sought to assess the effects of modafinil use on mental status after aSAH. METHODS: Modafinil timing and dosage, neurological examination, intubation status, and physical and occupational therapy participation were documented. Repeated-measures paired tests were used for a before-after analysis of modafinil recipients. Propensity score matching (1:1 nearest neighbor) for modafinil and no-modafinil cohorts was used to compare outcomes. RESULTS: Modafinil (100-200 mg/day) was administered to 21% (88/422) of aSAH patients for a median (IQR) duration of 10.5 (4-16) days and initiated 14 (7-17) days after aSAH. Improvement in mentation (alertness, orientation, or Glasgow Coma Scale score) was documented in 87.5% (77/88) of modafinil recipients within 72 hours and 86.4% (76/88) at discharge. Of 37 intubated patients, 10 (27%) were extubated within 72 hours after modafinil initiation. Physical and occupational therapy teams noted increased alertness or participation in 47 of 56 modafinil patients (83.9%). After propensity score matching for baseline covariates, the modafinil cohort had a greater mean (SD) change in Glasgow Coma Scale score than the no-modafinil cohort at discharge (2.2 [4.0] vs. -0.2 [6.32], P = 0.003). CONCLUSIONS: A temporal relationship with improvement in mental status was noted for most patients administered modafinil after aSAH. These findings, a favorable adverse-effect profile, and implications for goals-of-care decisions favor a low threshold for modafinil initiation in aSAH patients in the acute-care setting.
Asunto(s)
Modafinilo , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea , Promotores de la Vigilia , Humanos , Modafinilo/uso terapéutico , Masculino , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/complicaciones , Hemorragia Subaracnoidea/tratamiento farmacológico , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéutico , Anciano , Adulto , Resultado del Tratamiento , Compuestos de Bencidrilo/uso terapéutico , Escala de Coma de Glasgow , Accidente Cerebrovascular/complicaciones , Accidente Cerebrovascular/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Fatigue is highly prevalent in patients with IBD, affecting 72% of patients with active inflammatory bowel disease (IBD) and 47% in remission, and is associated with poor quality of life and significantly wider costs.1 However, understanding the mechanisms of IBD fatigue remains limited, as reflected in a lack of effective treatments.1.
Asunto(s)
Fatiga , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino , Modafinilo , Humanos , Fatiga/etiología , Fatiga/tratamiento farmacológico , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/complicaciones , Enfermedades Inflamatorias del Intestino/tratamiento farmacológico , Estudios Prospectivos , Masculino , Modafinilo/uso terapéutico , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Resultado del Tratamiento , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéutico , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
STUDY OBJECTIVES: Narcolepsy type 2 (NT2) is an understudied central disorder of hypersomnolence sharing some similarities with narcolepsy type 1 and idiopathic hypersomnia (IH). We aimed: (1) to assess systematically the symptoms in patients with NT2, with self-reported questionnaires: Epworth Sleepiness Scale (ESS), Narcolepsy Severity Scale (NSS), IH Severity Scale (IHSS), and (2) to evaluate the responsiveness of these scales to treatment. METHODS: One hundred and nine patients with NT2 (31.4â ±â 12.2 years old, 47 untreated) diagnosed according to ICSD-3 were selected in a Reference Center for Narcolepsy. They all completed the ESS, subgroups completed the modified NSS (NSS-2, without cataplexy items) (nâ =â 95) and IHSS (nâ =â 76). Some patients completed the scales twice (before/during treatment): 42 ESS, 26 NSS-2, and 30 IHSS. RESULTS: Based on NSS-2, all untreated patients had sleepiness, 58% disrupted nocturnal sleep, 40% hallucinations, and 28% sleep paralysis. On IHSS, 76% reported a prolonged nocturnal sleep, and 83% sleep inertia. In the independent sample, ESS and NSS-2 scores were lower in treated patients, with same trend for IHSS scores. After treatment, ESS, NSS-2, and IHSS total scores were lower, with a mean difference of 3.7â ±â 4.1, 5.3â ±â 6.7, and 4.1â ±â 6.2, respectively. The minimum clinically important difference between untreated and treated patients were 2.1 for ESS, 3.3 for NSS-2, and 3.1 for IHSS. After treatment, 61.9% of patients decreased their ESSâ >â 2 points, 61.5% their NSS-2â >â 3 points, and 53.3% their IHSSâ >â 3 points. CONCLUSIONS: NSS-2 and IHSS correctly quantified symptoms' severity and consequences in NT2, with good performances to objectify response to medications. These tools are useful for monitoring and optimizing NT2 management, and for use in clinical trials.
Asunto(s)
Hipersomnia Idiopática , Narcolepsia , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Humanos , Narcolepsia/diagnóstico , Narcolepsia/fisiopatología , Narcolepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Masculino , Femenino , Adulto , Hipersomnia Idiopática/diagnóstico , Hipersomnia Idiopática/fisiopatología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/fisiopatología , Alucinaciones/diagnóstico , Alucinaciones/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Modafinilo/uso terapéutico , Adulto Joven , Parálisis del Sueño/diagnóstico , Parálisis del Sueño/fisiopatología , Autoinforme , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The Transition Experience of persons with Narcolepsy taking Oxybate in the Real-world (TENOR) study assessed the real-world experience of people with narcolepsy switching from sodium oxybate (SXB) to low-sodium oxybate (LXB; 92 % less sodium than SXB). METHODS: TENOR is a patient-centric, prospective, observational, virtual-format study. Eligible participants included US adults with narcolepsy transitioning from SXB to LXB (±7 days from LXB initiation). Longitudinal data were collected from baseline (taking SXB) through 21 weeks post-transition. RESULTS: TENOR included 85 participants with narcolepsy (type 1, n = 45; type 2, n = 40). Mean (SD) age was 40.3 (13.0) years; the majority (73 %) were female and White (87 %). At study completion, wake-promoting agents were the most common concomitant medications (47 %). Mean (SD) SXB treatment duration was 57.8 (52.1) months; 96 % took SXB twice nightly. After transitioning, 97 % continued on twice-nightly regimens. Mean (SD) dose of both total nightly SXB (n = 85) and baseline LXB (n = 84) was 7.7 (1.5) g; SXB-LXB dose conversions at baseline were gram-for-gram in 87 % of participants. The mean final total nightly dose of LXB was 7.9 g. The most common participant-reported reasons for transitioning included lower sodium content for improved long-term health (93 %), physician recommendation (47 %), to avoid cardiovascular issues (39 %), to avoid side effects (31 %), and to improve control of narcolepsy symptoms (18 %). CONCLUSION: Most participants transitioned from SXB to LXB using a gram-for-gram strategy. The most commonly cited reason for transition was long-term health benefits due to lower sodium.
Asunto(s)
Narcolepsia , Oxibato de Sodio , Promotores de la Vigilia , Adulto , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Narcolepsia/diagnóstico , Estudios Prospectivos , Sodio/uso terapéutico , Oxibato de Sodio/efectos adversos , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) is a chronic condition characterized by intermittent hypoxia (IH) and sleep fragmentation (SF). OSA can induce excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) and is associated with impaired cognition and anxiety. Solriamfetol (SOL) and modafinil (MOD) are widely used wake-promoting agents in OSA patients with EDS. METHODS: Male C57Bl/6J mice were exposed to SF along with sleep controls (SC) or to IH and room air (RA) controls during the light (inactive) phase for 4 and 16 weeks, respectively. Both IH and SF exposures were then discontinued to mimic "ideal" continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP) adherence. All groups were then randomly assigned to receive once daily intraperitoneal injections of SOL, MOD, or vehicle (VEH) for 6 days. Sleep/wake activity was assessed along with tests of explicit memory, anxiety and depression were performed before and after treatments. RESULTS: IH and SF exposures increased sleep percentage in the dark phase and reduced wake bouts lengths (i.e., EDS), and induced cognitive deficits and impulsivity in mice. Both SOL and MOD treatments effectively mitigated EDS when combined with recovery, while recovery alone did not improve EDS over the 6-day period. Furthermore, improvements explicit memory emerged only after SOL. CONCLUSION: Chronic IH and SF induce EDS in young adult mice that is not ameliorated by recovery except when combined with either SOL or MOD. SOL, but not MOD, significantly improves IH-induced cognitive deficits. Thus, SOL emerges as a viable adjuvant medication for residual EDS in OSA along with its positive impact on cognition.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Promotores de la Vigilia , Humanos , Masculino , Animales , Ratones , Vigilia , Promotores de la Vigilia/farmacología , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéutico , Presión de las Vías Aéreas Positiva Contínua , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Modafinilo/farmacología , Modafinilo/uso terapéutico , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/etiología , Hipoxia , CogniciónRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Solriamfetol, a dopamine/norepinephrine reuptake inhibitor, is approved (in the United States and European Union) to treat excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) in adults with narcolepsy (75-150 mg/d) or obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) (37.5-150 mg/d). This study characterized real-world titration strategies for patients with narcolepsy (with or without comorbid OSA) initiating solriamfetol therapy. METHODS: This virtual, descriptive study included a retrospective medical record review and qualitative survey. US-based physicians prescribing solriamfetol for EDS associated with narcolepsy or OSA participated. Data are reported for patients with narcolepsy with or without comorbid OSA (OSA alone reported separately). On the basis of medical record review, titration strategies were classified de novo (EDS medication naive), transition (switched or switching from existing EDS medication[s] to solriamfetol), or add-on (adding solriamfetol to current EDS medication[s]). The survey included open-ended questions regarding a hypothetical patient-a 32-year-old woman with narcolepsy (Epworth Sleepiness Scale score of 8) treated with 35 mg/d of amphetamine and 6 g per night of sodium oxybate who experiences non-use-limiting adverse events from amphetamine. FINDINGS: Twenty-six physicians participated: 23 provided data from 70 patients with narcolepsy (type 1, n = 24; type 2, n = 46; mean [SD] age, 40 [11] years; 57% female; 6 with comorbid OSA), and 26 responded to the hypothetical patient scenario. From the medical record review, solriamfetol therapy initiation was de novo for 19 of 70 patients (27%), transition for 31 of 70 patients (44%), and add-on for 20 of 70 patients (29%). Efficacy profile of solriamfetol was the primary reason for de novo (12 of 19 [63%]), transition (18 of 31 [58%]), and add-on (19 of 20 [95%]) initiation. Most (86%) initiated use of solriamfetol at 75 mg/d and were stable at 150 mg/d (76%). Most (67%) had 1 dose adjustment, reaching a stable dose over a median (range) of 14 (1-60) days. Physicians most often considered EDS severity (44%) when titrating. Among transitioning patients, 14 of 22 (64%) using wake-promoting agents discontinued their use abruptly, and 5 of 9 (56%) using stimulants were tapered off. At data collection, 90% continued to take solriamfetol. Regarding the hypothetical patient scenario, most physicians (81%) thought solriamfetol was appropriate, highlighting tolerability issues with current treatment and lack of symptom control as drivers for switching; however, 3 physicians (12%) did not think solriamfetol was appropriate, noting current symptoms were not severe enough and/or symptoms could be managed by increasing sodium oxybate dose; 2 (8%) thought it would depend on other factors. Physicians emphasized managing withdrawal symptoms while maintaining EDS symptom control when titrating off a stimulant and starting solriamfetol therapy. IMPLICATIONS: In a real-world study, physicians initiated solriamfetol therapy at 75 mg/d for most patients with narcolepsy, adjusted dosages once, tapered stimulants, and abruptly discontinued therapy with wake-promoting agents.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva , Narcolepsia , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño , Oxibato de Sodio , Promotores de la Vigilia , Humanos , Adulto , Femenino , Masculino , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéutico , Oxibato de Sodio/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Narcolepsia/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/epidemiología , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/complicaciones , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/tratamiento farmacológicoRESUMEN
Narcolepsy is a chronic disabling neurological sleep disorder that requires lifelong treatment. We have outlined the clinical features of narcolepsy, the assessment and diagnosis process and have summarised the existing treatment options for children and adolescents with narcolepsy. In the future, the approach to management of paediatric narcolepsy should ideally be in a multidisciplinary setting, involving specialists in sleep medicine, sleep physiology, neurologists and psychologists/psychiatrists. A multidisciplinary approach will help to manage the potential impact of narcolepsy on children and adolescents who are in a stage of their life that is critical to their physical, emotional and social development and their academic attainment.
Asunto(s)
Narcolepsia/diagnóstico , Narcolepsia/terapia , Actigrafía/métodos , Adolescente , Cataplejía/diagnóstico , Cataplejía/terapia , Estimulantes del Sistema Nervioso Central/uso terapéutico , Niño , Ejercicio Físico , Humanos , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Polisomnografía/métodos , Sueño , Fármacos Inductores del Sueño/uso terapéutico , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéuticoRESUMEN
Excessive daytime sleepiness (EDS) affects approximately half of patients with obstructive sleep apnea (OSA) and can persist in some despite normalization of breathing, oxygenation, and sleep quality with primary OSA therapy, such as continuous positive airway pressure (CPAP). EDS is often overlooked and under discussed in the primary care setting and in the follow-up of CPAP-treated patients due to difficult assessment of such a multi-dimensional symptom. This review aims to provide suggestions for procedures that can be implemented into routine clinical practice to identify, evaluate, and manage EDS in patients treated for OSA, including how to appropriately use various self-report and objective assessments along the clinical pathway and options for pharmacotherapy. In addition, examples of when it is appropriate to refer a patient to a sleep specialist for evaluation are discussed.
Asunto(s)
Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/diagnóstico , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/tratamiento farmacológico , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/etiología , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/complicaciones , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéutico , Factores de Edad , Índice de Masa Corporal , Comorbilidad , Diagnóstico Diferencial , Trastornos de Somnolencia Excesiva/terapia , Conductas Relacionadas con la Salud , Humanos , Estilo de Vida , Factores de Riesgo , Autoinforme , Apnea Obstructiva del Sueño/terapia , Promotores de la Vigilia/administración & dosificación , Promotores de la Vigilia/efectos adversosAsunto(s)
Modafinilo/uso terapéutico , Narcolepsia/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Promotores de la Vigilia/uso terapéutico , Australia/epidemiología , Dextroanfetamina/economía , Dextroanfetamina/uso terapéutico , Costos de los Medicamentos/normas , Gastos en Salud/normas , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/economía , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/normas , Humanos , Metilfenidato/economía , Metilfenidato/uso terapéutico , Modafinilo/economía , Narcolepsia/diagnóstico , Narcolepsia/economía , Narcolepsia/epidemiología , Polisomnografía , Prevalencia , Ensayos Clínicos Controlados Aleatorios como Asunto , Oxibato de Sodio/economía , Oxibato de Sodio/uso terapéutico , Resultado del Tratamiento , Promotores de la Vigilia/economíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Idiopathic hypersomnia is a disorder of excessive daytime sleepiness, often accompanied by long sleep times or pronounced difficulty in awakening, in the absence of a known cause. The optimal treatment strategy for idiopathic hypersomnia is currently unknown. OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of medications for daytime sleepiness and related symptoms in individuals with idiopathic hypersomnia and, in particular, whether medications may: 1. reduce subjective measures of sleepiness; 2. reduce objective measures of sleepiness; 3. reduce symptoms of cognitive dysfunction; 4. improve quality of life; and 5. be associated with adverse events. SEARCH METHODS: We searched the following databases on 4 February 2021: Cochrane Register of Studies (CRS Web), MEDLINE (Ovid, 1946 to 1 February 2021), and reference lists of articles. CRS Web includes randomized or quasi-randomized controlled trials from PubMed, Embase, ClinicalTrials.gov, the World Health Organization International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (WHO ICTRP), the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), and the specialized registers of Cochrane Review Groups, including the Cochrane Epilepsy Group. We previously searched the WHO ICTRP separately when loading of ICTRP records into CRS Web was temporarily suspended. SELECTION CRITERIA: Randomized studies comparing any medication to placebo, another medication, or a behavioral intervention. DATA COLLECTION AND ANALYSIS: Two review authors independently extracted data and assessed trial quality. We contacted study authors for additional data. We collected data on adverse events from the included trials. MAIN RESULTS: We included three trials, with a total of 112 participants. Risk of bias was low for the included studies. Two pharmaceutical company-sponsored trials compared modafinil with placebo, involving 102 participants, nearly all of whom had idiopathic hypersomnia without long sleep time. Modafinil significantly improved self-reported sleepiness on the Epworth Sleepiness Scale by 5.08 points more than placebo (95% confidence interval (CI) 3.01 to 7.16; 2 studies, 101 participants; high-certainty evidence). Modafinil also significantly improved disease severity on the Clinical Global Impression of Severity scale by 1.02 points (95% CI 0.11 to 1.93; 1 study, 30 participants; moderate-certainty evidence) and resulted in a greater proportion of participants who were "much improved" or "very much improved" on the Clinical Global Impression of Change (odds ratio (OR) for improvement 5.14, 95% CI 1.76 to 15.00; 1 study, 70 participants; moderate-certainty evidence). Ability to remain awake on the Maintenance of Wakefulness Test was significantly improved with modafinil, by 4.74 minutes more than with placebo (95% CI 2.46 to 7.01; 2 studies, 99 participants; high-certainty evidence). Ratings of exhaustion and effectiveness/performance were improved with modafinil compared to placebo in one study. Number of naps per week was no different between modafinil and placebo across two studies. Participants receiving modafinil experienced more side effects, although the difference did not reach statistical significance (OR 1.68, 95% CI 0.28 to 9.94; 2 studies, 102 participants; low-certainty evidence). One trial studying 20 participants with different disorders of sleepiness included 10 participants with idiopathic hypersomnia, with or without long sleep time, and compared clarithromycin to placebo. We only included the subset of trial data for those participants with idiopathic hypersomnia, per our protocol. There were no significant differences between clarithromycin and placebo for the Epworth Sleepiness Scale, psychomotor vigilance testing, sleep inertia, other subjective ratings, or side effects. AUTHORS' CONCLUSIONS: Modafinil is effective for the treatment of several aspects of idiopathic hypersomnia symptomatology, based on studies predominantly including participants with idiopathic hypersomnia without long sleep times, with low risk of bias, and evidence certainty ranging from high to low. There is insufficient evidence to conclude whether clarithromycin is effective for the treatment of idiopathic hypersomnia. There is a clear need for additional studies testing interventions for the treatment of idiopathic hypersomnia.