Effects of insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I/IGF-binding protein-3 treatment on glucose metabolism and fat distribution in human immunodeficiency virus-infected patients with abdominal obesity and insulin resistance.

CONTEXT: HIV-infected patients on antiretroviral therapy are at increased risk for excess visceral adiposity and insulin resistance. Treatment with GH decreases visceral adiposity but worsens glucose metabolism. IGF-I, which mediates many of the effects of GH, improves insulin sensitivity in HIV-negative individuals. OBJECTIVE: Our objective was to determine whether IGF-I, complexed to its major binding protein, IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3), improves glucose metabolism and alters body fat distribution in HIV-infected patients with abdominal obesity and insulin resistance. METHODS: We conducted a pilot, open-label study in 13 HIV-infected men with excess abdominal adiposity and insulin resistance to assess the effect of 3 months of treatment with IGF-I/IGFBP-3 on glucose metabolism and fat distribution. Glucose metabolism was assessed by oral glucose tolerance test and hyperinsulinemic-euglycemic clamp. Endogenous glucose production (EGP), gluconeogenesis, whole-body lipolysis, and de novo lipogenesis (DNL) were measured with stable isotope infusions. Body composition was assessed by dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry and abdominal computed tomography scan. RESULTS: Glucose tolerance improved and insulin-mediated glucose uptake increased significantly during treatment. EGP increased under fasting conditions, and suppression of EGP by insulin was blunted. Fasting triglycerides decreased significantly in association with a decrease in hepatic DNL. Lean body mass increased and total body fat decreased, whereas visceral adipose tissue did not change. CONCLUSIONS: Treatment with IGF-I/IGFBP-3 improved whole-body glucose uptake and glucose tolerance, while increasing hepatic glucose production. Fasting triglycerides improved, reflecting decreased DNL, and visceral adiposity was unchanged.

Insulin-like growth factor I and insulin and their abuse in sport.

It is believed that insulin and insulin-like growth factor I (IGF-I) are abused by professional athletes, either alone or in combination with growth hormone (GH) and anabolic steroids. The recent introduction of IGF-I to clinical practice is likely to increase its availability and abuse. Insulin and IGF-I work together with GH to control the supply of nutrients to tissues in the fasted and fed state. The actions of insulin and IGF-I that may enhance performance include increased protein anabolism and glucose uptake and storage. The detection of IGF-I and insulin abuse is challenging. There are established mass spectrometry methods for insulin analogs. The feasibility of using GH-dependent markers to detect IGF-I use is being assessed.

Mecasermin rinfabate: rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 complex: iPLEX.

BACKGROUND: Mecasermin rinfabate (iPLEX), comprising rhIGF-I complexed to rhIGFBP-3, was developed in an attempt to prolong the half-life of IGF-I and potentially reduce side effects. It is administered as a once-daily subcutaneous injection. Treatment with rhIGF-I has been explored in a number of growth and endocrine disorders. OBJECTIVE: To review the published literature regarding the pharmacokinetics, safety profile and clinical efficacy of Mecasermin rinfabate. METHODS: A comprehensive search via the NCBI PubMed portal was performed using the search terms rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 complex, iPLEX and Somatokine. RESULTS: The effects of Mecasermin rinfabate have been explored in a number of clinical situations including diabetes, severe insulin resistance, osteopaenia, burns and growth hormone insensitivity syndrome, with outcomes similar to those of rhIGF-I alone. CONCLUSIONS: The biological effects of Mecasermin rinfabate are largely similar to those previously reported with rhIGF-I. There are little published data pertaining to pharmacokinetic properties in human subjects, and the side effect profile appears similar to that of rhIGF-I alone.

Effects of combined recombinant insulin-like growth factor (IGF)-I and IGF binding protein-3 in type 2 diabetic patients on glycemic control and distribution of IGF-I and IGF-II among serum binding protein complexes.

CONTEXT: Administration of recombinant human IGF-I (rhIGF-I)/recombinant human IGF binding protein-3 (rhIGFBP-3) to patients with type 2 diabetes improves blood glucose and enhances insulin sensitivity. The changes in various components of the IGF system that occur in response to rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 as well as the minimum effective dose have not been determined. OBJECTIVES: The aim was to determine the dose of rhIGF-I/rh-IGFBP-3 necessary to achieve a significant decrease in glucose and to determine the changes that occur in the IGF-II and acid labile subunit in response to treatment. DESIGN: A total of 39 insulin-requiring type 2 diabetics were randomized to placebo or one of six groups that received different dosages of rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3. After 3 d in which insulin doses were adjusted to improve glucose control, a variable insulin dosage regimen was continued, and either placebo or one of six dosages (0.125-2.0 mg/kg.d) of rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 was administered for 7 d. All subjects were hospitalized, and dietary intake as well as insulin dosage were controlled with instructions to treat to normal range targets. RESULTS: Fasting glucose was reduced in the groups that received either 1 (32 +/- 5% reduction) or 2 mg/kg.d (40 +/- 6% reduction) of the complex. Mean daily glucose (four determinations) was reduced by 26 +/- 4% in the 1 mg/kg group and by 33 +/- 5% in the 2 mg/kg group compared with 18 +/- 4% in the placebo group. Total serum IGF-I increased between 2.0 +/- 0.3- and 5.7 +/- 1.3-fold by d 8. IGFBP-3 concentrations increased significantly only in the 2 mg/kg group. IGF-II concentrations declined to values that were between 27 +/- 4% and 64 +/- 7% below baseline. Acid labile subunit concentrations declined significantly in the three highest dose groups. The sum of the IGF-I + IGF-II concentrations was significantly increased at the two highest dosages. There were very few drug-associated adverse events reported in this study with the exception of hypoglycemia, which occurred in 15 subjects who had received rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 treatment. CONCLUSIONS: Administration of rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 resulted in a redistribution of the amount of IGF-I and IGF-II that bound to IGFBP-3. Fasting and mean daily blood glucose were reduced significantly in the two highest dosage groups. The results suggest that both the total concentration of IGF-I as well as its distribution in blood may determine the extent to which insulin sensitivity is enhanced.

Pharmacokinetic studies of recombinant human insulin-like growth factor I (rhIGF-I)/rhIGF-binding protein-3 complex administered to patients with growth hormone insensitivity syndrome.

CONTEXT: GH insensitivity syndrome (GHIS), Laron syndrome, is characterized by severe short stature, high serum GH levels, and very low serum IGF-I and IGF-binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3) levels associated with a genetic defect of the GH receptor. Recombinant human (rh) IGF-I treatment at doses of 80-120 microg/kg given sc twice daily is effective in promoting growth in these patients. We have investigated a newly developed drug, rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3, a 1:1 molar complex of rhIGF-I and rhIGFBP-3. OBJECTIVES: The objectives of the study were to determine IGF-I pharmacokinetics after the administration of rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 in adolescents with GHIS and to evaluate its safety and tolerability. DESIGN: This was an open-label clinical study. SETTING: The study was conducted in a general pediatric ward of a university teaching hospital. PARTICIPANTS: Four patients (one female and three males; mean age, 14.9 yr; mean height sd score, -4.9) with confirmed molecular diagnosis of GHIS agreed to participate in the study. INTERVENTION: rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 was administered in a single sc injection at 0.5 and 1.0 mg/kg.dose (equivalent to 100 and 200 microg/kg rhIGF-I) after breakfast with a 2-d interval between doses. RESULTS: IGF-I levels reached a maximum between 19 +/- 8.3 and 15 +/- 6.2 h for the low and high doses, respectively. The circulating IGF-I levels obtained with the low and high doses were similar, although a discrete dose-dependent increase in circulating IGF-I levels was observed. The IGF-I half-life in four subjects after a dose of 0.5 mg/kg rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 was estimated to be 21+/- 4 h. There were no acute adverse events reported, and all blood glucose measurements were normal. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrated that the rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 complex was effective in increasing levels of circulating total and free IGF-I into the normal range for a 24-h period after a single sc administration in patients with GHIS, and that administration of rhIGF-I/rhIGFBP-3 was safe and well tolerated.

The combination of insulin-like growth factor I and insulin-like growth factor-binding protein-3 reduces insulin requirements in insulin-dependent type 1 diabetes: evidence for in vivo biological activity.

Insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) enhances insulin action in normal subjects and in patients with both type 1 and 2 diabetes; however, its administration is associated with significant side effects in a high percentage of patients. The coadministration of IGF binding protein-3 (IGFBP-3, the predominant IGF binding protein in serum) with IGF-I limits IGF-I inducible side effects, but it does not attenuate the ability of IGF-I to enhance protein synthesis and bone accretion; therefore, we determined whether IGF-I/IGFBP-3 would retain biological activity in type 1 DM and limit side effects associated with free IGF-I administration. Twelve patients received recombinant human IGF-I plus IGFBP-3 (2 mg/kg-day) by continuous sc infusion for 2 weeks. Each subject served as his own control; and, during a paired 2-week period, each received a placebo infusion. The order of the treatments was randomized. Subjects were placed on a constant caloric intake but were allowed to adjust insulin doses to maintain appropriate levels of glycemic control. Subjects measured blood glucose four times per day at home and kept a log of their insulin use. Frequent sampling for glucose, insulin, and GH was conducted during four inpatient study periods, one at the beginning and one at the end of each 2-week study interval. During IGF-I/IGFBP-3, insulin doses were reduced by 49%, and mean serum glucose was reduced by 23%. Free insulin levels obtained during frequent sampling in hospital fell 47% on IGF-I/IGFBP-3, compared with control, but showed no change with placebo. Concomitant glucose measurements did not differ in the two treatment groups. There was no change in body weight. Fructosamine levels decreased by 12%, but this was not significant (P < 0.1). Fasting triglyceride was unchanged, but cholesterol declined from 170 +/- 24 to 149 +/- 31 mg/dL (P < 0.05). IGFBP-2 (an IGF-I-dependent responsive variable) rose from 141 +/- 56 to 251 +/- 98 ng/mL (P < 0.01) on IGF-I/IGFBP-3. To analyze the mechanism by which IGF-I/IGFBP-3 might reduce insulin requirements, the change in serum GH was quantified. Mean GH levels were reduced by 72%, from 2.48 to 0.55 ng/mL (P < 0.001). An equal number (40%) of drug- and placebo-treated subjects had minor hypoglycemic episodes at home that required adjustment of insulin doses. No episode was classified as severe. In contrast to previous studies with free IGF-I, there were no cases of edema, headache, jaw pain, retinal edema, or Bell's palsy. No subject withdrew because of drug complications. These findings indicate that IGF-I/IGFBP-3 is biologically active on carbohydrate metabolism, as measured by a decrease in insulin requirements in patients with type 1 diabetes. Further studies will be required to determine the long-term safety and efficacy of this combination in patients with insulin resistance and diabetes.

Does the GH-IGF axis play a role in cancer pathogenesis?

Recent case-controlled studies have found increases in the serum levels of insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) in subjects who had, or who eventually developed, prostate or premenopausal breast cancers. Since growth hormone (GH) increases IGF-I levels, concern has been raised regarding its potential role as a cancer initiation factor. The epidemiological studies, which indicate an association between serum IGF-I levels and cancer risk, have not established causality. In fact, several alternative explanations for the elevated serum IGF-I levels in cancer patients may be proposed based on human and animal models. First, an effect of IGF-I causing symptomatic benign tissue hyperplasia may result in an ascertainment bias leading to an initiation of procedures resulting in the diagnosis of asymptomatic cancers. Second, elevated serum IGF-I in cancer patients may originate within the tumor (as suggested by some animal studies). Thirdly, serum IGF-I may actually be a surrogate marker of tissue IGF-I levels or of nutritional factors, which are not under GH control and may be involved in cancer initiation. The role of GH in cancer initiation is further negated by the fact that in acromegaly, the incidence of cancer, other than possibly colonic neoplasia does not appear to be significantly increased. Furthermore, GH transgenic mice, with high IGF-I levels, do not develop breast, prostate, or colonic malignancies. It is known that IGFBP-3 can inhibit IGF action on cancer cells in vitro and also can induce apoptosis via an IGF-independent mechanism. Importantly, in addition to increasing IGF-I levels, GH also increases the serum levels of IGFBP-3 and serum IGFBP-3 levels have been shown to be negatively correlated with the risk of cancer in the above mentioned epidemiological studies and in a similar study on colon cancer. These studies suggest that cancer risk is increased in individuals in whom both high IGF-I levels and low IGFBP-3 levels are present. In subjects treated with GH, IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels both rise together and are not within the elevated cancer-risk range, based on published studies. Long-term studies are needed to assess the potential risks, including the long-term cancer risk associated with GH therapy. These should take into account several factors, including the duration of exposure, the risk magnitude associated with the degree of serum IGF-I elevation, and the adjusted risk based on a concomitant increase in IGFBP-3 levels. Since GH treated patients often have sub-normal IGF-I serum levels, which normalize on therapy, one might predict that their cancer risk on GH therapy should not increase above the normal population. Until further research in the area dictates otherwise, on-going cancer surveillance and routine monitoring of serum IGF-I and IGFBP-3 levels in GH-recipients should be the standard of care. At present, the data that are available do not warrant a change in our current management of approved indications for GH therapy.