Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 123
Filtrar
1.
Int J Med Sci ; 18(15): 3599-3608, 2021.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34522187

RESUMEN

Objective: The easy liver fibrosis test (eLIFT) is a novel predictor of liver fibrosis in chronic liver disease (CLD). This study aimed to evaluate the predictive value of the eLIFT for liver inflammation and fibrosis in CLD patients. Methods: We enrolled 1125 patients with CLD who underwent liver biopsy. The predictive accuracy for liver inflammation and fibrosis of the eLIFT was assessed and compared to that of the aspartate aminotransferase-to-platelet ratio index (APRI), fibrosis-4 score (FIB-4), and gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase-to-platelet ratio (GPR) by ROC (Receiver Operating Characteristic) analysis and decision curve analysis (DCA). Results: The areas under the ROC curves (AUROCs) of the eLIFT for assessing liver inflammation G ≥ 2 and G ≥ 3 were 0.77 (0.75-0.80) and 0.81 (0.79-0.84), with cut-offs of 8.0 and 11.0, respectively. The AUROCs of the eLIFT for predicting fibrosis stages S ≥ 2 and S4 were 0.72 (0.70-0.76) and 0.76 (0.72-0.80), with cut-offs of 9.0 and 10.0, respectively. In discriminating G≥2 inflammation, the AUROC of the eLIFT was better than that of the FIB-4, with no difference compared with the GPR, but lower than that of the APRI. When discriminating G≥3 inflammation, the AUROC of the eLIFT was comparable to that of the APRI and GPR but superior to that of the FIB-4. There were no significant differences between the four indexes for predicting S≥2 and S4. Conclusion: The eLIFT is a potentially useful noninvasive predictor of liver inflammation and fibrosis in patients with CLD.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Hepática en Estado Terminal/diagnóstico , Pruebas de Función Hepática/normas , Índice de Severidad de la Enfermedad , Adulto , Biomarcadores/sangre , Plaquetas/metabolismo , Femenino , Humanos , Inflamación , Pruebas de Función Hepática/métodos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Curva ROC , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , gamma-Glutamiltransferasa/sangre
2.
United European Gastroenterol J ; 9(5): 598-625, 2021 06.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34128346

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: 13 C-breath tests are valuable, noninvasive diagnostic tests that can be widely applied for the assessment of gastroenterological symptoms and diseases. Currently, the potential of these tests is compromised by a lack of standardization regarding performance and interpretation among expert centers. METHODS: This consensus-based clinical practice guideline defines the clinical indications, performance, and interpretation of 13 C-breath tests in adult and pediatric patients. A balance between scientific evidence and clinical experience was achieved by a Delphi consensus that involved 43 experts from 18 European countries. Consensus on individual statements and recommendations was established if ≥ 80% of reviewers agreed and <10% disagreed. RESULTS: The guideline gives an overview over general methodology of 13 C-breath testing and provides recommendations for the use of 13 C-breath tests to diagnose Helicobacter pylori infection, measure gastric emptying time, and monitor pancreatic exocrine and liver function in adult and pediatric patients. Other potential applications of 13 C-breath testing are summarized briefly. The recommendations specifically detail when and how individual 13 C-breath tests should be performed including examples for well-established test protocols, patient preparation, and reporting of test results. CONCLUSION: This clinical practice guideline should improve pan-European harmonization of diagnostic approaches to symptoms and disorders, which are very common in specialist and primary care gastroenterology practice, both in adult and pediatric patients. In addition, this guideline identifies areas of future clinical research involving the use of 13 C-breath tests.


Asunto(s)
Pruebas Respiratorias/normas , Consenso , Vaciamiento Gástrico , Infecciones por Helicobacter/diagnóstico , Helicobacter pylori , Pruebas de Función Hepática/normas , Pruebas de Función Pancreática/normas , Adulto , Pruebas Respiratorias/métodos , Isótopos de Carbono , Niño , Técnica Delphi , Europa (Continente) , Humanos , Hígado/fisiología , Pruebas de Función Hepática/métodos , Páncreas Exocrino/fisiología , Pruebas de Función Pancreática/métodos , Urea/análisis
3.
Regul Toxicol Pharmacol ; 124: 104963, 2021 Aug.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-34102240

RESUMEN

Recently we provided a new interpretation that increased serum ALP in dogs is not adverse if no hepatotoxic finding coexists in the analysis of toxicity studies of over 200 pesticides evaluated in Japan (Yokoyama et al., 2019). We also proposed a decision tree to evaluate the adversity of the increased ALP. The present analysis was conducted to validate the reliability of this interpretation with 129 pesticides more recently evaluated. Before applying, the decision tree was revised to be consistent in all steps. The pesticides showed similar characterization of increased ALP to the previous analysis in that the increase was more frequent than in rats and that liver hypertrophy and hepatotoxicity commonly coexisted with an increase in ALP in dogs. When short- and long-term studies of 58 pesticides inducing ALP activity in dogs were applied to the revised tree, the increased ALP in 8 pesticides was judged not adverse in either study. The revision of the tree did not affect the NOAEL judgment of these pesticides; however, the revised routes contributed to the judgment more robustly. This study showed the reliability of our interpretation and applicability of the decision tree to evaluate the adversity of increased ALP in dogs.


Asunto(s)
Fosfatasa Alcalina/sangre , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/diagnóstico , Árboles de Decisión , Plaguicidas/toxicidad , Pruebas de Toxicidad/métodos , Animales , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/sangre , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/etiología , Modelos Animales de Enfermedad , Perros , Femenino , Humanos , Japón , Pruebas de Función Hepática/métodos , Pruebas de Función Hepática/normas , Nivel sin Efectos Adversos Observados , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados , Pruebas de Toxicidad/normas
4.
J Drugs Dermatol ; 20(3): 320-325, 2021 03 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-33683085

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There are currently no evidence-based recommendations to guide lab monitoring in the first 90 days of methotrexate treatment. The purpose of this study was to determine whether certain monitoring practices or baseline patient characteristics were associated with increased risk of developing clinically meaningful lab abnormalities during the course of methotrexate treatment. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This retrospective cohort study analyzed 243 dermatologically managed patients taking methotrexate at the University of Virginia Health System. Odds ratios were used to analyze the risk of these patients developing lab abnormalities that result in a change in clinical management, referred to as clinically relevant events. Chi-square analysis was used to determine the optimal timing of methotrexate lab monitoring. RESULTS: A diagnosis of congestive heart failure (P=0.03), chronic kidney disease (P=0.03), and an initial low platelet count (P=0.008) increased the odds of developing a clinically relevant event at some point during methotrexate therapy. In the first 15 days following methotrexate initiation, only 1/114 (0.9%) lab draws resulted in discontinuation of the medicine, 1/114 (0.9%) resulted in maintenance of a stable dose, and 2/114 (1.8%) resulted in repeat laboratory testing. CONCLUSION: In the absence of concerning baseline patient characteristics, dermatologists may consider postponing initial lab monitoring until 15 days post methotrexate initiation.J Drugs Dermatol. 2021;20(3):320-325. doi:10.36849/JDD.5790.


Asunto(s)
Dermatología/normas , Monitoreo de Drogas/normas , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/diagnóstico , Metotrexato/efectos adversos , Enfermedades de la Piel/tratamiento farmacológico , Adolescente , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Análisis Químico de la Sangre/normas , Análisis Químico de la Sangre/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Dermatología/estadística & datos numéricos , Monitoreo de Drogas/estadística & datos numéricos , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/sangre , Efectos Colaterales y Reacciones Adversas Relacionados con Medicamentos/etiología , Femenino , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Hepática/normas , Pruebas de Función Hepática/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto , Estudios Retrospectivos , Enfermedades de la Piel/sangre , Enfermedades de la Piel/inmunología , Factores de Tiempo , Adulto Joven
5.
J Clin Pharmacol ; 61(1): 105-115, 2021 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32691438

RESUMEN

Guidance from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the European Medicines Agency recommends using Child-Pugh classification for pharmacokinetic evaluation in noncancer subjects with hepatic impairment (HI). Therefore, dosing recommendations for oncology compounds for patients with HI are commonly based on Child-Pugh classification. In oncology clinical practice, National Cancer Institute classification (NCIc), is commonly used for evaluating hepatic function and dosing decisions for oncology patients. This work evaluated the discordance between the 2 systems and the impact on dosing recommendations. The classification system in HI studies was reviewed for FDA-approved oncology compounds. Discordance between Child-Pugh and NCIc was evaluated for sunitinib, dacomitinib, palbociclib, bosutinib, and axitinib. Pharmacokinetic (PK) analyses were conducted based on Child-Pugh classification and NCIc. Review of 117 approved oncology compounds showed prevalent use of Child-Pugh classification for dedicated HI studies in noncancer subjects. NCIc is commonly used in cancer patient studies. NCIc tended to classify subjects as less impaired versus Child-Pugh (64.9%, 73.7%, and 61.5% of subjects with mild, moderate, and severe HI, respectively, via Child-Pugh were classified as at least 1 category less impaired via NCIc). PK analyses by NCIc were consistent with Child-Pugh for sunitinib, dacomitinib, and palbociclib. For bosutinib, NCIc showed less impact of HI than Child-Pugh; an opposite trend was observed for axitinib. The impact of this considerable discordance between the 2 systems on dosing decisions bears consideration. When Child-Pugh is used for HI study enrollment, exploratory PK analyses based on NCIc should be conducted. Prescribers should attempt to use the same classification system in the product label for dosing decisions.


Asunto(s)
Antineoplásicos/administración & dosificación , Antineoplásicos/farmacocinética , Hepatopatías/epidemiología , Pruebas de Función Hepática/normas , National Cancer Institute (U.S.)/normas , Neoplasias/epidemiología , Relación Dosis-Respuesta a Droga , Humanos , Neoplasias/tratamiento farmacológico , Estados Unidos , United States Food and Drug Administration/normas
7.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 49(6): 702-713, 2019 03.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30761572

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The last decade has seen a rapid growth in the number of clinical trials enrolling patients with nonalcoholic fatty liver disease and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). Due to the underlying chronic liver disease, patients with NASH often require different approaches to the assessment and management of suspected drug-induced liver injury (DILI) compared to patients with healthy livers. However, currently no regulatory guidelines or position papers systematically address best practices pertaining to DILI in NASH clinical trials. AIMS: This publication focuses on best practices concerning the detection, monitoring, diagnosis and management of suspected acute DILI during clinical trials in patients with NASH. METHODS: This is one of several papers developed by the IQ DILI Initiative, comprised of members from 15 pharmaceutical companies, in collaboration with DILI experts from academia and regulatory agencies. This paper is based on extensive literature review, and discussions between industry members with expertise in drug safety and DILI experts from outside industry to achieve consensus on common questions related to this topic. RESULTS: Recommended best practices are outlined pertaining to hepatic inclusion and exclusion criteria, monitoring of liver tests, DILI detection, approach to a suspected DILI signal, causality assessment and hepatic discontinuation rules. CONCLUSIONS: This paper provides a framework for the approach to assessment and management of suspected acute DILI during clinical trials in patients with NASH.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/terapia , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/normas , Manejo de la Enfermedad , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/terapia , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/diagnóstico , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/epidemiología , Ensayos Clínicos como Asunto/métodos , Humanos , Pruebas de Función Hepática/métodos , Pruebas de Función Hepática/normas , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/diagnóstico , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/epidemiología
8.
Medicine (Baltimore) ; 98(6): e14399, 2019 Feb.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30732184

RESUMEN

Cholestasis in drug-induced liver injury (DILI) can be assessed by biochemical and pathologic methods, but the agreement between the 2 methods remains unclear.The aim of this study was to identify the accurate method for assessment of cholestasis in DILI.The DILI standard established and revised by the Council for International Organizations of Medical Sciences (CIOMS) (R values were calculated by liver function at different time points), cholestatic liver disease guideline (European Association for the Study of the Liver, EASL), and liver pathology were used to assess, compare, and analyze the cholestasis in 133 patients with DILI.The R values at different time points in CIOMS standard had no statistical difference for the assessment of cholestatic DILI (a = 0.05, χ = 1.51, P = .679). There were statistical differences among the results of CIOMS, EASL, and pathology (a = 0.05, χ = 99.97, P < .001). EASL standard had no statistical difference with pathology (a = 0.003, χ = 8.00, P = .005).CIOMS and EASL standards based on biochemical parameters underestimated cholestatic DILI, as compared to liver pathology.


Asunto(s)
Biopsia/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/complicaciones , Colestasis/diagnóstico , Pruebas de Función Hepática/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Biopsia/métodos , Biopsia/normas , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/patología , Colestasis/inducido químicamente , Femenino , Humanos , Hígado/patología , Pruebas de Función Hepática/métodos , Pruebas de Función Hepática/normas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Valores de Referencia , Reproducibilidad de los Resultados
9.
Clin Chim Acta ; 490: 142-146, 2019 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30611730

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The growth and development of children and adolescents influence values of liver and renal function tests. The purpose of this study was to determine age- and gender-specific reference intervals for liver and renal function tests in apparently healthy Chinese children and adolescents. METHODS: A total of 63,086 apparently healthy children and adolescents (0-15 y) were chosen as reference individuals in this study. The 15 biochemical analytes relating to liver and renal function were measured using an Olympus AU5400 analyzer. Reference intervals were partitioned according to age and/or gender subgroups using the Harris and Boyd's method and established using non-parametric methods. RESULTS: Our results showed that all analytes except for cholinesterase (ChE) and α1-microglobulin (α1-MG) required partitioning by age. Gender partitions were also required for alanine aminotransferase (ALT), aspartate aminotransferase (AST), gamma-glutamyl transferase (GGT), alkaline phosphatase (ALP), creatinine (Cre), and uric acid (UA). Age- and gender-appropriate reference intervals for liver and renal function tests were established for apparently healthy Chinese children and adolescents. CONCLUSIONS: When establishing pediatric reference intervals, partitioning by age and/or gender is essential. Those reference intervals can be adopted in other clinical laboratories after appropriate validation.


Asunto(s)
China , Pruebas de Función Renal/normas , Pruebas de Función Hepática/normas , Adolescente , Niño , Preescolar , Femenino , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Masculino , Valores de Referencia
11.
Am J Gastroenterol ; 113(11): 1660-1668, 2018 11.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-30353056

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: The current upper limits of normal (ULN) for serum alanine aminotransferase (ALT) are increasingly challenged. We aimed to re-evaluate the ULN for ALT and assess the potential impact on the classification of natural course of chronic hepatitis B virus (HBV) infection in children. METHODS: Laboratory data obtained from three hospitals in China were retrospectively analysed. In total, 2054 children with chronic HBV infection and 8149 healthy children at age ≤18 years were included in the study. RESULTS: Age-specific and gender-specific ULNs for ALT, at averages of 30 U/L for boys and 24 U/L for girls, were calculated from the data of healthy children. Using the revised ULNs vs. the current ULNs (40-50 U/L), 31-60% vs. 9-17% of the 2054 HBV-infected children had an abnormal result as seen in their ALT baseline analysis, and the highest abnormality rate was seen in the infants. Data of 516 HBV-infected children were applied for the classification of clinical phase, 28.8% vs. 19.8% of the children were classified into the phases of hepatitis B e antigen (HBeAg-)positive/negative hepatitis. During a median follow-up of 62 months, 39 of 153 children underwent HBeAg seroconversion, whereas 3 of them had persistently "normal" ALT, according to the current ULN. CONCLUSIONS: The revision of ULN for ALT in children substantially impacts the classification of the natural course of chronic HBV infection. Mild ALT fluctuation is common during the stage childhood, suggesting a need to rethink the current conceptions of immune tolerance and natural course of chronic HBV infection in the children.


Asunto(s)
Alanina Transaminasa/normas , Virus de la Hepatitis B/aislamiento & purificación , Hepatitis B Crónica/diagnóstico , Adolescente , Factores de Edad , Alanina Transaminasa/sangre , Niño , Preescolar , China , Femenino , Antígenos e de la Hepatitis B/sangre , Antígenos e de la Hepatitis B/aislamiento & purificación , Virus de la Hepatitis B/inmunología , Hepatitis B Crónica/sangre , Hepatitis B Crónica/inmunología , Hepatitis B Crónica/virología , Humanos , Lactante , Pruebas de Función Hepática/métodos , Pruebas de Función Hepática/normas , Masculino , Valores de Referencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores Sexuales
12.
Aliment Pharmacol Ther ; 47(7): 989-1000, 2018 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29446106

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Liver fibrosis is often accompanied by steatosis, particularly in patients with non-alcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD), and its non-invasive characterisation is of utmost importance. Vibration-controlled transient elastography is the non-invasive method of choice; however, recent research suggests that steatosis may influence its diagnostic performance. Controlled Attenuation Parameter (CAP) added to transient elastography enables simultaneous assessment of steatosis and fibrosis. AIM: To determine how to use CAP in interpreting liver stiffness measurements. METHODS: This is a secondary analysis of data from an individual patient data meta-analysis on CAP. The main exclusion criteria for the current analysis were unknown aetiology, unreliable elastography measurement and data already used for the same research question. Aetiology-specific liver stiffness measurement cut-offs were determined and used to estimate positive and negative predictive values (PPV/NPV) with logistic regression as functions of CAP. RESULTS: Two thousand and fifty eight patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria (37% women, 18% NAFLD/NASH, 42% HBV, 40% HCV, 51% significant fibrosis ≥ F2). Youden optimised cut-offs were only sufficient for ruling out cirrhosis (NPV of 98%). With sensitivity and specificity-optimised cut-offs, NPV for ruling out significant fibrosis was moderate (70%) and could be improved slightly through consideration of CAP. PPV for significant fibrosis and cirrhosis were 68% and 55% respectively, despite specificity-optimised cut-offs for cirrhosis. CONCLUSIONS: Liver stiffness measurement values below aetiology-specific cut-offs are very useful for ruling out cirrhosis, and to a lesser extent for ruling out significant fibrosis. In the case of the latter, Controlled Attenuation Parameter can improve interpretation slightly. Even if cut-offs are very high, liver stiffness measurements are not very reliable for ruling in fibrosis or cirrhosis.


Asunto(s)
Diagnóstico por Imagen de Elasticidad/métodos , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Hígado/diagnóstico por imagen , Adulto , Biopsia , Elasticidad , Femenino , Humanos , Hígado/patología , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Cirrosis Hepática/fisiopatología , Pruebas de Función Hepática/métodos , Pruebas de Función Hepática/normas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/diagnóstico , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
13.
Ann Clin Biochem ; 55(4): 446-452, 2018 Jul.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29153025

RESUMEN

Aims Physiological changes that occur during pregnancy can influence biochemical parameters. Therefore, using reference intervals based on specimens from non-pregnant women to interpret laboratory results during pregnancy may be inappropriate. This study aimed to establish the essential reference intervals for a range of analytes during pregnancy. Methods A cross-sectional study was performed in 13,656 healthy pregnant and 2634 non-pregnant women. Fifteen biochemical measurands relating to renal and hepatic function were analysed using an Olympus AU5400 analyzer (Olympus, Tokyo, Japan). All the laboratory results were checked for outliers using Dixon's test. Reference intervals were established using a non-parametric method. Results Alanine aminotransferase, aspartate aminotransferase, albumin, cholinesterase, creatinine, direct bilirubin, gamma-glutamyl transpeptidase, total bilirubin, total bile acid and total protein showed a decrease during the whole gestational period, while alkaline phosphatase and uric acid increased. Urea nitrogen, ß2-microglobulin and cystatin-C fell significantly during the first trimester and then remained relatively stable until third trimester. Reference intervals of all the measurands during normal pregnancy have been established. Conclusions The reference intervals established here can be adopted in other clinical laboratories after appropriate validation. We verified the importance, for some measurands, of partitioning by gestational age when establishing reference intervals during pregnancy.


Asunto(s)
Factores de Edad , Edad Gestacional , Pruebas de Función Renal/normas , Pruebas de Función Hepática/normas , Embarazo/fisiología , Adolescente , Adulto , Pueblo Asiatico , Índice de Masa Corporal , Estudios de Casos y Controles , Estudios Transversales , Femenino , Humanos , Valores de Referencia , Adulto Joven
14.
Cardiovasc Ther ; 35(3)2017 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28276175

RESUMEN

INTRODUCTION: Amiodarone is associated with significant long-lasting adverse drug reactions (ADRs). Guidelines recommend laboratory monitoring during long-term use. However, data of compliance with laboratory monitoring are lacking. AIMS: The aim of this study was to assess laboratory monitoring of liver and thyroid function during amiodarone prescribing from 1989 to 2011 in the Tayside, UK, population (approximately 400 000) in relation to National Guidelines recommending laboratory monitoring every 6 months. We also report the population-level incidence of abnormal liver and thyroid function in relation to total exposure of amiodarone. METHODS: Utilizing well-established record-linkage database, a longitudinal retrospective analysis of 1413 patients on long-term amiodarone was carried out, analyzing prescribing, biochemical, and clinical data. RESULTS: Forty-six percent (46%), 28%, and 21% of patients underwent liver, thyroid, and combined testing, respectively, in accordance with guideline recommendations. Thirteen percent and 17% of patients did not have any ALT or TSH testing, respectively. During follow-up, 117 (9.5%) patients had an ALT 3×ULN and 16% patients had an abnormal TSH, (n=125, <0.4 mU/L and n=28, >10 mU/L). One hundred and forty patients (10%) required thyroxine replacement therapy, and 40 (3%) required on hyperthyroid medication. Total amiodarone exposure increased the likelihood of abnormal biochemical testing 2.5-fold after 4 years therapy for liver and thyroid function (P<.0005). CONCLUSION: In this population-based study, adherence to laboratory monitoring guidelines was suboptimal. There was a positive correlation with total amiodarone exposure and biochemical abnormalities and development of thyroid disease compared to the general population, highlighting the need for improvement and continued amiodarone monitoring.


Asunto(s)
Amiodarona/efectos adversos , Antiarrítmicos/efectos adversos , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/epidemiología , Monitoreo de Drogas/normas , Pruebas de Función Hepática/normas , Enfermedades de la Tiroides/epidemiología , Pruebas de Función de la Tiroides/normas , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Amiodarona/administración & dosificación , Antiarrítmicos/administración & dosificación , Enfermedad Hepática Inducida por Sustancias y Drogas/diagnóstico , Bases de Datos Factuales , Esquema de Medicación , Femenino , Adhesión a Directriz/normas , Humanos , Incidencia , Estudios Longitudinales , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Guías de Práctica Clínica como Asunto/normas , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Riesgo , Escocia/epidemiología , Enfermedades de la Tiroides/inducido químicamente , Enfermedades de la Tiroides/diagnóstico , Enfermedades de la Tiroides/tratamiento farmacológico , Factores de Tiempo
15.
Obes Surg ; 27(9): 2347-2353, 2017 09.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-28229316

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Morbid obese patients have a high rate of nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD) and nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH). NASH is related to the progression and poor evolution of chronic hepatopathy in NAFLD, so that its detection makes it possible to identify the subjects who are most at risk in order to prioritize treatment. The ELF test (Enhanced Liver Fibrosis test; Siemens Diagnostics, NY, USA) has been assessed for its capacity to detect fibrosis in patients with NAFLD, but its capacity for diagnosing NASH has not been checked. AIMS: Our objective is to determine the utility of the ELF test for detecting NASH in morbid obese patients with suspected NAFLD. METHODS: ELF values were determined in a cohort of obese patients who underwent bariatric surgery with suspected NAFLD. Liver biopsy was used as the reference standard. RESULTS: The values of ELF were significantly higher in patients with NASH (p = 0.002) and in those who presented with metabolic syndrome (p = 0.047). An ELF cut-off point of 8.72 allows the detection of patients with NASH with a sensitivity of 71.4% and a specificity of 74.1% (AUC = 0.742, p = 0.002). CONCLUSIONS: The ELF test is efficient for the identification of obese patients with NAFLD and early signs of steatohepatitis and fibrosis.


Asunto(s)
Hígado Graso/diagnóstico , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/diagnóstico , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/diagnóstico , Adulto , Algoritmos , Cirugía Bariátrica , Biomarcadores/análisis , Biopsia , Estudios de Cohortes , Progresión de la Enfermedad , Hígado Graso/complicaciones , Hígado Graso/patología , Hígado Graso/fisiopatología , Femenino , Humanos , Hígado/patología , Hígado/fisiopatología , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Pruebas de Función Hepática/métodos , Pruebas de Función Hepática/normas , Masculino , Síndrome Metabólico/complicaciones , Síndrome Metabólico/diagnóstico , Síndrome Metabólico/fisiopatología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/complicaciones , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/patología , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/fisiopatología , Obesidad Mórbida/fisiopatología , Obesidad Mórbida/cirugía , Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas , Estándares de Referencia , Sensibilidad y Especificidad
18.
Turk J Gastroenterol ; 28(Suppl 2): 90-93, 2017 12.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-29303105

RESUMEN

The present guideline updates the Turkish recommendations for the screening, diagnosis and management of Hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection prepared by the Turkish Association for the Study of the Liver (TASL) and Viral Hepatitis Society (VHS). The aim of this guidance was to provide updates recommendations to physicians, who are interested in HCV care on the optimal screening, diagnosis and pre-treatment management for patients with HCV infection in Turkey. These recommendations, produced by panel experts, were aimed to addresses the management issues ranging from diagnosis and linkage to care, to the optimal treatment regimen in patients with HCV infection. Recommendations are based on evidence and opinions of more than 70% of the panelists. This guidance is supported by the memberships of two societies and not by pharmaceutical companies. This guidance will be updated frequently as new data become available.


Asunto(s)
Manejo de la Enfermedad , Hepatitis C , Antivirales/normas , Antivirales/uso terapéutico , Hepacivirus , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/virología , Pruebas de Función Hepática/normas , Turquía
19.
Obes Surg ; 27(1): 115-125, 2017 01.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-27220852

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Obesity and its related comorbidities are significant risk factors for nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (NAFLD). Liver fibrosis is the major determinant of long-term outcomes in NAFLD. A non-invasive tool that accurately identifies obese patients at elevated risk of liver fibrosis would be of significant value. Fibrosis risk scores in patients with NAFLD have been proposed but have not been validated in obese populations. We aimed to validate established simple fibrosis scores in bariatric surgical patients. METHODS: We conducted a prospective study of 107 consecutive high-risk obese patients undergoing primary bariatric surgery. Proposed fibrosis scores (NAFLD fibrosis score; body mass index (BMI), aspartate aminotransferase (AST)/alanine aminotransferase ratio (ALT), and diabetes (BARD); Fibrosis-4 (FIB-4); Forn; and AST to platelet ratio index) were calculated and compared hepatic fibrosis determined by histology of intraoperative liver biopsies. Accuracy was determined, and fibrosis score thresholds were optimized. These modified thresholds were then validated in an independent bariatric surgical population. RESULTS: Liver biopsies were available in 101 patients. Sixty-eight patients had some degree of fibrosis, with 23 patients (23 %) having significant fibrosis (F2-4). The Forn score best predicted significant fibrosis (area under the receiver operator characteristic curve (AUROC) 0.724, p = 0.001). With standard thresholds, the sensitivity for the Forn score for identification of significant fibrosis (F2-4) was 0 %. Using modified thresholds of 3.5, the sensitivity and negative predictive value increased to 85.7 and 94.7 %. This threshold was applied to an independent validation cohort with good accuracy. CONCLUSIONS: Fibrosis risk scores using simple markers have moderate success at delineating obese patients with significant NAFLD-related fibrosis. Thresholds, however, need to be lowered to maximize diagnostic accuracy in this cohort.


Asunto(s)
Técnicas de Diagnóstico Endocrino , Cirrosis Hepática/diagnóstico , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/diagnóstico , Obesidad Mórbida/diagnóstico , Adulto , Área Bajo la Curva , Cirugía Bariátrica , Biopsia , Técnicas de Diagnóstico Endocrino/normas , Femenino , Humanos , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Cirrosis Hepática/patología , Pruebas de Función Hepática/normas , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/complicaciones , Enfermedad del Hígado Graso no Alcohólico/patología , Obesidad Mórbida/complicaciones , Obesidad Mórbida/patología , Curva ROC , Proyectos de Investigación/normas , Factores de Riesgo
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA