[Modern techniques and features of selective keratoplasty]. / Sovremennye tekhnologii i vozmozhnosti selektivnoi keratoplastiki.

Selective keratoplasty involves replacing the affected layers of the cornea with similar donor tissue. In case of pathological changes in the middle and posterior stroma, deep anterior lamellar keratoplasty (DALK) is performed. Chronic corneal edema caused by endothelial dysfunction is an indication for endothelial keratoplasty - Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) or Descemet Stripping Endothelial Keratoplasty (DSAEK). Compared to penetrating keratoplasty (PK), these operations are characterized by a low risk of damage to intraocular structures and a relatively short rehabilitation period. Complications of selective keratoplasty include the formation of a false chamber between the lamellar graft and the recipient's cornea, ocular hypertension during anterior chamber air tamponade. Persistent epithelial defect can be a sign of primary graft failure in DALK, DSAEK and DMEK. Selective keratoplasty is characterized by a lower incidence of immune rejection than PK. In some cases, DALK can be complicated by corneal changes related to suture fixation of the graft. Long-term postoperative use of topical glucocorticoids can cause ocular hypertension and cataracts.

Outcomes after reversed corneal graft rejection: a report from the European VISICORT project.

OBJECTIVE: This study aims to describe the outcome of corneal grafts, both low risk and high risk, after successfully reversed immunological rejection. METHODS: Datasets on reversed rejection episodes in penetrating and endothelial keratoplasties between 2014 and 2019 (n=876) were extracted from the Adverse Immune Signatures and their Prevention in Corneal Transplantation database, which contains the prospectively and consecutively collected corneal transplants from five European centres. Stratified by the preoperatively determined risk status for immunological rejection, the outcome parameters analysed included visual acuity, intraocular pressure, endothelial cell density and central corneal thickness before and after reversed rejection episodes. RESULTS: Fourty-seven (52%) out of a total of 91 identified rejection episodes were successfully reversed and were available for analysis (23 penetrating and 24 endothelial keratoplasties). No statistically significant change was found for any of the parameters studied between the values before and the values 3 months after the rejection episode, irrespective of the preoperative risk status. CONCLUSION: The outcome of corneal grafts that survive immunological rejection may be clinically indistinguishable from the state before immunological rejection, irrespective of graft type and risk status. These findings support clinicians by providing information on prognosis after reversed rejection episodes and by giving patients realistic expectations regarding the outcome.

Plastic vs. glass: the effect of the synthetic material in contact with DMEK tissue during staining on endothelial cell loss.

PURPOSE: Endothelial cell loss (ECL) during Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft preparation has been shown to affect graft survival and the need for re-grafting. The purpose of this study was to quantitatively assess the impact of the plastic and glass mediums in contact with DMEK donor tissue during intra-operative graft staining on ECL. METHODS: Retrospective study that included patients who underwent DMEK surgery between January 2019 and June 2021 at Hôpital Maisonneuve-Rosemont and the Jewish General Hospital in Montreal, Canada. DMEK grafts were stained with 0.06% Trypan blue ophthalmic solution (VisionBlue®, Dutch Ophthalmic, USA, Exeter, NH) for 120 s in either a plastic or glass medium prior to delivery into the recipient's eye. The ECL was compared between the two groups 12-30 months post-operatively. RESULTS: ECL at 12-30 months was significantly less in the eyes that had received grafts stained in a plastic medium compared to those stained in a glass medium. Graft survival and re-bubbling was higher in the glass group however this difference was not statistically significant. CONCLUSION: Staining of the DMEK graft in a plastic medium caused less ECL compared to the glass medium.

Epithelial ingrowth in descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty associated with vitreous loss.

BACKGROUND: Epithelial ingrowth is a rare but potentially sight-threatening complication caused by the invasion of corneal or conjunctival epithelial cells into the eye during ocular surgeries. DMEK is emerging as a widely used surgery for endothelial keratoplasty with its improved safety profile. We describe a case of epithelial ingrowth in the graft-host interface after uneventful DMEK associated with vitreous prolapse in the anterior chamber. CASE PRESENTATION: An 81-year-old female with Fuchs endothelial dystrophy underwent DMEK for corneal decompensation following cataract surgery. During the DMEK procedure, vitreous prolapse was observed around the intraocular lens (IOL). Her early postoperative course was unremarkable, but a dense paracentral interface opacity was observed during the 3-month follow-up. The area of epithelial ingrowth was imaged with optical coherence tomography (OCT) as a uniform nodule with a discrete increase in interface hyperreflectivity. A low-energy YAG laser was applied to remove the opacity. She maintained good vision and clear cornea without reoccurrence after treatment. CONCLUSIONS: We propose that, in addition to the introduction of epithelial cells during surgery, vitreous retention in the anterior chamber may be a risk factor by providing a scaffold that potentially aggravates epithelial ingrowth in DMEK. Our case demonstrated that early YAG intervention may disrupt interface epithelial cell growth, and the transmitted laser energy may fragment the scaffold vitreous noninvasively.

Double-Bubble Technique Assisted by Holding Forceps: A Modified Technique in Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty for Vitrectomized Eyes With Scleral Fixated Intraocular Lens.

PURPOSE: Several techniques have been developed for graft unfolding approaches in Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). However, despite these techniques, graft deployment and configuration in eyes with deep anterior chambers remain challenging in some cases. Therefore, in this study, we described a modified technique for DMEK, known as the "double-bubble technique assisted by holding forceps." METHODS: This was a retrospective interventional case series. Patients who underwent DMEK between August 2022 and July 2023, including cases with a history of vitrectomy and scleral fixation of intraocular lens, were enrolled in this study. Two experienced surgeons performed DMEK. In brief, after graft insertion into the anterior chamber, the first bubble with a small volume of air was injected above the graft to open the tight roll, and the graft edge was held using a 25-gauge graft manipulator. The second bubble was injected underneath the graft for fixation, while the graft edge was grasped using forceps during gas injection. The graft was released from the forceps. Best spectacle corrected visual acuity, central corneal thickness, endothelial cell density, and incidence of postoperative complications were measured before and after DMEK. RESULTS: Eleven eyes of 11 patients were included in this study (mean follow-up period, 4.5 ± 4.4 months). Best spectacle corrected visual acuity and central corneal thickness significantly improved postoperatively ( P < 0.001). Rebubbling was required in 2 eyes; no other postoperative complications or primary graft failure were observed. CONCLUSIONS: The present technique enables safe and feasible DMEK surgery in vitrectomized eyes with scleral fixated IOLs and in those with a deep anterior chamber.

Re-descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) with preservation of the original graft after free roll in anterior chamber: A case report.

INTRODUCTION: Lamellar keratoplasties have had a great impact in the management of corneal edema due to endothelial dysfunction. Minimally invasive transplant techniques such as Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) have helped to reduce the morbidity involved in performing penetrating keratoplasty in this type of patient. Even so, these are complex techniques that are not free of complications and require a long line of surgical learning and an even more demanding experience in postoperative management. CLINICAL CASE: An 89-year-old woman suffering from Fuchs endothelial dystrophy and undergoing combined cataract and DMEK surgery presented stromal edema predominantly inferior and sectoral detachment of the graft 24 h after the intervention. After re-bubbling in consultations and 4 days later, the graft was observed rolled and free in the anterior chamber. She underwent re-DMEK with preservation of the original graft after 24 h, with de-epithelialization to optimize visualization. The graft was stained with trypan blue and the posterior stroma was protected with air. The graft was reimplanted under intraocular maneuvers and with an air bubble. 24 h after surgery, the adhered graft was observed, with a great decrease in stromal edema. One month later, the patient had a clear cornea, persistent complete graft adhesion, and visual acuity of 0.9. CONCLUSION: The discovery of free roll in the anterior chamber after DMEK surgery constitutes the most complex form of graft detachment. Corneal edema as well as the arrangement of the different intraocular structures are conditions to be considered for the surgical resolution of this complication. In many cases, surgical repositioning of the graft is feasible, which means saving costs without the need to use new donor corneal tissues.

Chamber shallowing technique for challenging DMEK cases: Tucking cellulose spears under the speculum to augment posterior pressure.

Some anterior chambers do not readily shallow because of insufficient posterior pressure and/or very deep anterior chamber anatomy, which can make unscrolling descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) tissue more challenging with an unmodified tap technique. We present a hands-free method for augmenting posterior pressure by temporarily tucking cellulose sponges under the blades of the eyelid speculum. The sponges transfer some of the eyelid speculum's weight onto the bulbar surface posterior to the iris, thereby indenting the sclera and causing the iris diaphragm to bulge further forward. This hands-free technique can transform a potentially challenging DMEK case into a more straightforward one by facilitating both a shallow anterior chamber and a bimanual unscrolling technique. However, it only works in bicameral eyes with a vitreous body (e.g., an eye with penetrating keratoplasty, vitreous syneresis, and axial myopia) and will not work in unicameral eyes after vitrectomy (e.g., an eye with an Anterior Chamber Intraocular Lens (ACIOL)).

Hitting the refractive target in corneal endothelial transplantation triple procedures: A systematic review.

In phakic patients Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) or Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) are frequently combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens (IOL) implantation (triple procedure). This surgery might cause a refractive shift difficult to predict. Early DMEK and DSAEK results have shown a tendency toward a hyperopic shift. Myopic postoperative refraction is typically intended to correct this postoperative refractive defect and to bring all eyes as close to emmetropia as possible. We sought to understand the mechanism underlying the hyperopization and to identify predictive factors for poorer refractive outcomes, the most suitable target refraction and IOL calculation methods in patients undergoing combined cataract extraction and lamellar endothelial corneal transplantation (DSAEK or DMEK) for endothelial dysfunctions. Of the 407 articles analyzed, only 18 were included in the analysis. A myopic target between -0.50 D and -0.75 was the most common (up to -1.50 for DSAEK triple procedures), even though no optimum target was found. Hyperopic surprises appeared more frequently in corneas that were flatter in the center than in the periphery (oblate posterior profile). Among the numerous IOL calculation formulas, there was no apparent preference.

One-year Outcomes of Ultrathin Descemet Stripping Automated Endothelial Keratoplasty Combined with Cataract Surgery in the Korean Population.

PURPOSE: To evaluate the refractive outcomes after ultrathin Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) combined with phacoemulsification and intraocular lens implantation (triple procedure) in the South Korean population. METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 37 eyes of 36 patients who underwent the UT-DSAEK triple procedure between 2012 and 2021 in a single tertiary hospital. Preoperative and postoperative refractive outcomes and endothelial parameters at 1, 3, 6, and 12 months were observed. RESULTS: At the final postoperative 12-month period, the average best-corrected visual acuity was 0.4 ± 0.5 in logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution. The mean endothelial cell density at 12 months was 1,841.92 ± 731.24 cells/mm2, indicating no significant endothelial cell loss compared to the baseline (p = 0.128). The mean postoperative central corneal thickness at 12 months was 597.41 ± 86.26 µm. The postoperative mean absolute error at 12 months was 0.96 ± 0.89 diopters (D) and mean error was 0.89 ± 0.97 D. CONCLUSIONS: The results of our South Korean cohort study on UT-DSAEK triple surgery showed favorable and safe outcomes. Regardless of graft thickness, it should be noted that a hyperopic shift of 1.00 to 2.00 D needs to be considered in the case of UT-DSAEK triple surgery.

Donor Corneal Endothelial Cell Maturity and Its Impact on Graft Survival in Glaucoma Patients Undergoing Corneal Transplantation.

PURPOSE: To examine corneal graft survival via corneal endothelial cell density (ECD) and corneal endothelial cell loss (ECL) at 5 years post-transplantation in the eyes of patients with and without a history of undergoing glaucoma surgery according to the maturity of the donor corneal endothelial cells. DESIGN: Prospective cohort study. METHODS: This prospective cohort study included 17 patients with glaucoma and 51 patients without glaucoma who underwent Descemet's stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty or penetrating keratoplasty at the Baptist Eye Institute, Kyoto, Japan, between October 2014 and October 2016. Human corneal endothelial cells were cultured from residual peripheral donor cornea tissue, and the maturity of the cells was evaluated by cell surface markers (ie, CD166+, CD44-/dull, CD24-, and CD105-) using fluorescence-activated cell sorting. Kaplan-Meier analysis or the chi-square test was used to assess the rate of successful corneal graft survival post-transplantation. RESULTS: At 36 months postoperatively, the mean ECD and ECL in the glaucoma-bleb eyes were 1197 ± 352 cells/mm2 and 55.5% ± 13.9% in the high-maturity group and 853 ± 430 cells/mm2 and 67.7% ± 18.1% in the low-maturity group, respectively. Kaplan-Meier analysis revealed that at 5 years postoperatively, the overall rate of survival was 45%, that is, 100% in the high-maturity group and 25% in the low-maturity group (P < .05). CONCLUSIONS: The findings in this prospective cohort study revealed that the use of donor corneal grafts containing mature-differentiated corneal endothelial cells could maintain the survival of the transplanted graft for a long-term period, even in patients with a history of undergoing glaucoma surgery.

Double trouble in DMEK surgery: Learning experience and review of the literature.

PURPOSE: To report a challenging Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty (DMEK) case, complicated by intraoperative aqueous misdirection and spontaneous anterior chamber fibrin reaction. METHODS: A 70-year-old female affected by corneal edema due to Fuchs endothelial dystrophy underwent a triple procedure (cataract extraction - IOL implantation - DMEK surgery) in her left eye. This report illustrates the management of the intraoperative complications of aqueous misdirection syndrome and anterior chamber fibrin reaction. RESULTS: Despite the optimal management of the posterior pressure and the thorough removal of the fibrinous reaction during the case, the DMEK graft was not completely unfolded and centred at the end of the surgical procedure. Nonetheless, the patient showed good long-term anatomical and functional recovery: at the last follow-up (2 years after surgery), central corneal thickness was 526 µm with a best corrected visual acuity of 20/25 and an endothelial cell density of 1112 cell/mm2. CONCLUSION: Early recognition and prompt management of intraoperative aqueous misdirection syndrome and anterior chamber fibrin reaction during DMEK surgery is essential to ensure good functional and anatomical outcomes.

Corneal Endothelium Viability Assay Using Trypan Blue Dye After Preloaded Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty Graft Preparation.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study was to establish a validated method, consistent with Eye Bank Association of America medical standards, for evaluating endothelial cell loss (ECL) from an entire Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) graft using trypan blue dye as an alternative to specular microscopy. METHOD: Twenty-nine corneas were prepared for preloaded DMEK by a single technician, and the endothelium was stained with trypan blue dye for 30 seconds. The technician estimated total cell loss as a percentage of the graft and captured an image. Images were evaluated by a blinded technician using ImageJ software to determine ECL and compared with endothelial cell density from specular microscopy. Tissue processing intervals were analyzed for 4 months before and after implementation of this method. RESULTS: For the 29 grafts, there was no statistically significant difference ( t test, P = 0.285) between ECL estimated by a processor (mean = 5.8%) and ECL calculated using an ImageJ software (mean = 5.1%). The processor tended to estimate greater ECL than the actual ECL determined by ImageJ (paired t test, P = 0.022). Comparatively, postprocessing endothelial cell density measured by specular microscopy were higher compared with the preprocessing endothelial cell density (mean = 4.5% P = 0.0006). After implementation of this evaluation method, DMEK graft processing time intervals were reduced by 47.9% compared with specular microscopy evaluation ( P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Our results show that visual ECL estimation using trypan blue staining by a DMEK graft processor is a reliable and efficient method for endothelial assessment. Unlike specular microscopy, this method achieves comprehensive visualization of the entire endothelium, reduces total time out of cold storage, and decreases total time required to prepare and evaluate DMEK grafts.

Performance outcomes from a DMEK peeling and preparation wet lab.

OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) preparation performance of trainee surgeons in an ex vivo human donor cornea DMEK wet lab simulation setting. METHODS: Human donor corneoscleral rims unsuitable for transplantation were obtained from Moorfields Lions Eye Bank. At the wet lab, graft stripping was performed by scoring the peripheral endothelium. The trypan blue positive cells (TBPC) and cell density (cells/mm2-reticule count) were counted manually before and after stripping. The procedural time, peripheral and central tears and complete peel-off were also recorded and analysed. RESULTS: Eight trainee surgeons attended the wet lab each attempting three DMEKs. Between the first and last attempts a significant decrease was seen in the procedural time (17.6 min vs 10.6 min (p<0.05)) and the TBPC % (12.9% vs 3.8% (p<0.05)). The percentage of tears peripherally and centrally also reduced between the first and the last trials (50% vs 13% (p=0.2226) and 38% vs 0% (p=0.1327)). A significant correlation was found between longer peeling times and higher TBPC % (p<0.001) with a 0.7% endothelial mortality increase for each additional minute required to complete the peel. CONCLUSIONS: DMEK wet labs provide a controlled risk-free learning opportunity for trainee surgeons to improve confidence and competence. Wet labs improve the success rate of DMEK graft preparation as well as flatten the learning curve. This emphasises the importance of continued support for the expansion of this valuable learning resource, promoting wider uptake of DMEK surgery.

Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial 1 (DETECT 1): outcome masked, placebo-controlled trial comparing two types of corneal transplant surgeries and effect of rho kinase inhibitors on endothelial cell loss protocol.

BACKGROUND: It remains uncertain which endothelial keratoplasty (EK) technique yields the best outcomes while maintaining safety, particularly in eyes with coexisting ocular conditions. Moreover, the impact of endothelial cell loss (ECL) on long-term graft survival requires further investigation. Adjuvant ripasudil, a rho kinase inhibitor, may address the challenge of ECL in corneal transplantation. This paper presents the protocol for the Descemet Endothelial Thickness Comparison Trial 1 (DETECT 1), a multicentre, outcome-masked, randomised, placebo-controlled, four-arm clinical trial. METHODS: A total of 160 eligible patients with endothelial dysfunction will be enrolled from five participating sites in the USA. The patients will be randomly assigned in a 2×2 factorial design to one of the following treatment groups: group 1-ultrathin Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty (UT-DSAEK) plus topical ripasudil 0.4%; group 2-UT-DSAEK plus topical placebo; group 3-Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK) plus topical ripasudil 0.4% and group 4-DMEK plus topical placebo. Primary outcomes include the best spectacle-corrected visual acuity at 12 months and ECL at 12 months. Secondary outcomes include visual acuity at different time points, vision-related quality of life, endothelial cell morphology and cost-effectiveness. RESULTS: The study outcomes will be analysed using mixed effects linear regression models, taking into account the treatment arms and relevant covariates. Adverse events, including rebubble procedures, graft failure and graft rejection, will be documented and analysed using appropriate statistical methods. CONCLUSION: DETECT I aims to provide evidence on the comparative effectiveness of UT-DSAEK and DMEK, as well as the potential benefits of adjuvant topical ripasudil in reducing ECL. The results of this trial will contribute to optimising corneal transplantation techniques and improving long-term graft survival, while also exploring the cost-effectiveness of these interventions. Dissemination of findings through peer-reviewed publications and national/international meetings will facilitate knowledge translation and guide clinical practice in the field of corneal transplantation. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: A data and safety monitoring committee (DSMC) has been empaneled by the NEI.All study protocols will be subject to review and approval by WCG IRB as the single IRB of record.This study will comply with the National Institute of Health (NIH) Data Sharing Policy and Policy on the Dissemination of NIH-Funded Clinical Trial Information and the Clinical Trials Registration and Results Information Submission rule. Data from the trial will be made available on reasonable request.

Optimized Kalinnikov-Dinh technology for effective pre-Descemet's endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) graft preparation and preservation.

We report an optimized Kalinnikov-Dinh technology for pre-Descemet's endothelial keratoplasty (PDEK) that involves the use of a ring fixator, base, 30G needle connected to a 5-ml syringe with a spring-loaded plunger, and storage media. Our method allows to minimize graft preparation failure and preserves the PDEK graft efficiently, by reducing complications associated with the formation of type 1 big bubbles, including bubble rupture, perforation of Descemet's membrane and endothelium, and formation of type 2 or mixed type of big bubbles, and may contribute to increasing the number of surgeons performing PDEK around the globe.

Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty via a frown incision.

PURPOSE: To assess the outcomes of Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) via a sclerocorneal frown incision. STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective comparative study. METHODS: The outcomes of Descement stripping endothelial keratoplasty (DSAEK) were retrospectively compared between 36 patients (36 eyes) who underwent surgery via a 3.8-mm frown incision (frown incision group) and 20 patients (20 eyes) who underwent surgery via a 4.6-mm straight incision (straight incision group). In all patients, an NS Endo-Inserter was used as the graft inserter and the incision for a frown incision was via the superior sclerocorneal site and for the straight incision via the temporal cornea. DSAEK was performed by the standard technique, except for the incision. At 1 year after surgery, the two groups were compared with respect to the visual acuity, decrease of corneal endothelial cell density, the severity of corneal astigmatism (diopters), the number of sutures for wound closure, and intraoperative/postoperative complications. RESULTS: There was no significant difference between the two groups in terms of postoperative visual acuity, corneal astigmatism, and intraoperative/postoperative complications one year after surgery. On the other hand, the number of sutures required for wound closure was 1.13 ± 0.42 in the frown incision group, whereas in the straight incision group, it was 3.20 ± 0.40, showing a significant difference (P<0.001). In addition, there was no decreased corneal endothelial cell density associated with the reduction in incision width. CONCLUSIONS: A sclerocorneal frown incision is useful for performing DSAEK with an NS Endo-Inserter as it does not affect endothelial cell loss despite its short incision width.

[Chinese expert consensus on corneal endothelial transplantation (2024)].

Endothelial keratoplasty (EK) is an effective therapy for corneal endothelial diseases and mainly includes Descemet stripping endothelial keratoplasty and Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty. Compared with penetrating keratoplasty, EK has better vision rehabilitation and a lower rate of allograft rejection after surgery. However, EK poses a series of technical challenges, and varied complications may occur intraoperatively and postoperatively. A successful EK surgery depends on the standardized technical manipulations and the management of surgical complications. In order to standardize the surgical procedure of EK in China, the Cornea Group of Ophthalmology Branch of Chinese Medical Association has made a comprehensive discussion about indications of surgery, preoperative evaluation, surgical manipulations, and the management of complications based on the literature available thus far and clinical practice in China, and eventually established this consensus, which may guide corneal surgeons in performing the EK surgery.

Artificial Endothelial Layer Implantation After Multiple Failed Keratoplasties.

PURPOSE: Presenting the first case of noncellular corneal endothelial substitute after multiple failed penetrating keratoplasty (PK) and lamellar endothelial keratoplasty. METHODS: Our case presented with pseudophakic bullous keratopathy after a history of 2 rejected PKs and 1 rejected Descemet stripping automated endothelial keratoplasty. We implanted an artificial endothelial layer. RESULTS: The implant remained fully attached for a follow-up period of 12 months, and central corneal thickness decreased significantly. The patient reported improvement in her subjective vision, although ocular comorbidities limited the visual potential. CONCLUSIONS: This new device could serve as an alternative to lamellar endothelial corneal transplantation in cases where tissue rejection has occurred and is highly likely to recur. The technique is simple, and the deswelling effect on the cornea persisted, although the visual results require further validation in patients with a higher visual potential.

Corneal Guttae After Descemet Membrane Endothelial Keratoplasty.

PURPOSE: The aim of this study was to report on the occurrence of corneal guttae after Descemet membrane endothelial keratoplasty (DMEK). METHODS: In this retrospective case series, 13 eyes of 13 patients who underwent DMEK at 2 tertiary referral centers between 2007 and 2021 (average available follow-up 73 ± 52 months, range 18-174 months) and showed corneal guttae during postoperative examinations were included. Eye bank images were retrospectively reviewed. RESULTS: Occurrence of guttae was observed by specular microscopy in 13 eyes. In 11 cases, presence of guttae was confirmed by confocal microscopy and in 1 case by histology. Five eyes showed an increase in guttae density during the postoperative course. Surgery indications were Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy (n = 11), pseudophakic bullous keratopathy (n = 1), and DMEK graft failure after allograft rejection (n = 1); the latter eye had shown no signs of guttae after primary DMEK. Two eyes with guttae required a repeat DMEK due to graft failure. At the last available follow-up, all 11 remaining eyes had clear corneas and 10 eyes had a best-corrected visual acuity of ≥0.9 (decimal). During donor cornea processing in the eye bank, no guttae were observed on the donor tissue. CONCLUSIONS: Corneal guttae can occur after DMEK including in eyes operated for indications other than Fuchs endothelial corneal dystrophy and most likely guttae were present on the donor graft but were not detectable by routine slit-lamp and light microscopy evaluation in the eye bank. Postoperative guttae density varies among patients and especially small isolated guttae do not seem to affect clinical outcomes.