RESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This retrospective study aimed to investigate the factors influencing the occurrence of neutropenia in patients with endometrial cancer (EC) following adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: Retrospective analysis of EC patients who underwent adjuvant CRT from January 2012 to June 2023 in the Department of Gynecology and Oncology of the First Affiliated Hospital of Shandong First Medical University. Neutropenia was defined as an Absolute Neutrophil Count (ANC) of peripheral blood neutrophils below 2 × 109/L. Factors affecting neutropenia in EC patients treated with CRT using Generalized Estimating Equation (GEE), and Logistic regression was used to further analyze the effect of adding radiotherapy to different chemotherapy cycles on neutropenia, so that patients receive optimal adjuvant CRT while the risk of neutropenia is appropriately controlled. RESULTS: A total of 144 patients met the inclusion criteria. They underwent 330 cycles of adjuvant chemotherapy, of whom 96 (66.7%) developed neutropenia, which occurred 140 times. The results of one-way GEE analysis showed that before CRT, White Blood Cell (WBC) (OR = 0.827; 95%CI, 0.701-0.976), ANC (OR = 0.749; 95%CI, 0.586-0.957), Absolute Monocyte Count (AMC) (OR = 0.047; 95%CI, 0.008-0.283), Blood Urea Nitrogen (BUN) (OR = 0.857; 95%CI, 0.741-0.991), platinum and docetaxel (platinum/docetaxel) dosing regimen (OR = 2.284; 95%CI, 1.130-4.618) were associated with neutropenia with adjuvant CRT for EC (p < 0.05), results of multifactorial GEE analysis showed that before adjuvant CRT ANC (OR = 0.552; 95%CI, 0.973-2.231), AMC (OR = 0.047; 95%CI, 0.004-0.052), platinum/docetaxel (OR = 2.437; 95%CI, 1.087-5.464) were an independent influence on neutropenia in adjuvant CRT for EC (p < 0.05). Multifactorial Logistic regression shows addition of radiotherapy to the first cycle of chemotherapy (OR = 4.413; 95%CI, 1.238-18.891) was an independent influence of neutropenia (p < 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with low pre-CRT ANC and AMC, platinum/docetaxel dosing regimens need to be closely monitored during each cycle of CRT. Also, the concurrent addition of radiotherapy should be avoided during the first cycle of chemotherapy.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Endometriales , Neutropenia , Humanos , Femenino , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Endometriales/terapia , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neutropenia/etiología , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Adulto , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/efectos adversos , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Pronóstico , Docetaxel/administración & dosificación , Docetaxel/efectos adversos , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Neoadjuvant therapy is an essential modality for reducing the clinical stage of esophageal cancer; however, the superiority of neoadjuvant chemotherapy (nCT) or neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (nCRT) is unclear. Therefore, a discussion of these two modalities is necessary. AIM: To investigate the benefits and complications of neoadjuvant modalities. METHODS: To address this concern, predefined criteria were established using the PICO protocol. Two independent authors performed comprehensive searches using predetermined keywords. Statistical analyses were performed to identify significant differences between groups. Potential publication bias was visualized using funnel plots. The quality of the data was evaluated using the Risk of Bias Tool 2 (RoB2) and the GRADE approach. RESULTS: Ten articles, including 1928 patients, were included for the analysis. Significant difference was detected in pathological complete response (pCR) [P < 0.001; odds ratio (OR): 0.27; 95%CI: 0.16-0.46], 30-d mortality (P = 0.015; OR: 0.4; 95%CI: 0.22-0.71) favoring the nCRT, and renal failure (P = 0.039; OR: 1.04; 95%CI: 0.66-1.64) favoring the nCT. No significant differences were observed in terms of survival, local or distal recurrence, or other clinical or surgical complications. The result of RoB2 was moderate, and that of the GRADE approach was low or very low in almost all cases. CONCLUSION: Although nCRT may have a higher pCR rate, it does not translate to greater long-term survival. Moreover, nCRT is associated with higher 30-d mortality, although the specific cause for postoperative complications could not be identified. In the case of nCT, toxic side effects are suspected, which can reduce the quality of life. Given the quality of available studies, further randomized trials are required.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma , Neoplasias Esofágicas , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Humanos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Adenocarcinoma/mortalidad , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Resultado del Tratamiento , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Quimioradioterapia/métodos , Quimioradioterapia/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The objective of the study was to assess the effectiveness and toxicity of platinum-based adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (POCRT) in comparison to postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) in patients with head and neck adenoid cystic carcinoma (HNACC). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective study analyzed patients diagnosed with HNACC at our center between January 2010 and April 2020. A 1:1 propensity score matching method was used to create a matched cohort. RESULTS: In this study, 206 patients were analyzed, with 147 patients (71.4%) receiving postoperative radiotherapy (PORT) and 59 patients (28.6%) receiving POCRT. Twenty-one patients experienced local-regional failure. The 3-, 5-, and 10-yr local-regional control (LRC) rate for the cohort were 92.0%, 90.6%, and 86.9%, respectively. In both the entire cohort and the matched cohort, the POCRT group exhibited superior LRC compared to the PORT group (Gray's test, all P < 0.05*). Multivariate analysis identified adjuvant concurrent chemotherapy as an independent prognostic factor for LRC (Competing risks regression, HR = 0.144, 95% CI 0.026-0.802, P = 0.027*). In addition, the POCRT group had higher incidences of upper gastrointestinal toxicity and hematologic toxicities, including leukopenia, neutropenia, and anemia (all P < 0.05*). CONCLUSION: In terms of reducing locoregional failures in HNACC patients, POCRT may potentially offer a more effective therapeutic approach than using PORT alone, although it also entails an augmented burden of treatment-related toxicity.
Asunto(s)
Carcinoma Adenoide Quístico , Carcinoma , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello , Leucopenia , Humanos , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Radioterapia Adyuvante , Carcinoma Adenoide Quístico/terapia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias de Cabeza y Cuello/radioterapia , Platino (Metal)/uso terapéuticoAsunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Humanos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/inmunología , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Resultado del Tratamiento , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , QuimioradioterapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: To date, few studies have compared effectiveness and survival rates of neoadjuvant chemotherapy combined with immunotherapy (NACI) and conventional neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (NCRT) in patients with locally advanced esophageal squamous cell carcinoma (ESCC). The present study was conducted to compare therapeutic response and survival between NACI and NCRT. METHODS: The study cohort comprised patients with locally advanced ESCC treated with either NACI or NCRT followed by surgery between June 2018 and March 2021. The 2 groups were compared for treatment response, 3-year overall survival (OS), and disease-free survival (DFS). Survival curves were created using the Kaplan-Meier method, differences were compared using the log-rank test, and potential imbalances were corrected for using the inverse probability of treatment weighting (IPTW) method. RESULTS: Among 202 patients with locally advanced ESCC, 81 received NACI and 121 received conventional NCRT. After IPTW adjustment, the R0 resection rate (85.2% vs 92.3%; P = .227) and the pathologic complete response (pCR) rate (27.5% vs 36.4%; P = .239) were comparable between the 2 groups. Nevertheless, patients who received NACI exhibited both a better 3-year OS rate (91.7% vs 79.8%; P = .032) and a better 3-year DFS rate (87.4% vs 72.8%; P = .039) compared with NCRT recipients. CONCLUSIONS: NACI has R0 resection and pCR rates comparable to those of NCRT and seems to be correlated with better prognosis than NCRT. NACI followed by surgery may be an effective treatment strategy for locally advanced ESCC.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Humanos , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/terapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/mortalidad , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Masculino , Femenino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Neoplasias Esofágicas/mortalidad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Terapia Neoadyuvante/mortalidad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Esofagectomía/mortalidad , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Inmunoterapia/métodos , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/mortalidad , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Resultado del Tratamiento , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Quimioradioterapia/mortalidadRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The optimal adjuvant treatment for patients with locally advanced endometrial cancer (EC) remains debatable. We comparatively analyzed recurrence patterns and survival outcomes in patients with stage III-IVA EC treated with adjuvant chemotherapy (CT) exclusively or combined with radiotherapy (CRT). METHODS: We retrospectively analyzed 184 patients treated for stage III-IVA EC at 2 tertiary institutions between 2010 and 2021. All patients underwent standard primary surgery and received either CT alone (n = 89) or CRT (n = 95) as an adjuvant treatment. We compared the failure patterns, recurrence-free survival (RFS), and overall survival (OS) between the CT and CRT groups. RESULTS: The median follow-up period was 54.8 months. Most patients underwent pelvic (94.6%) or para-aortic (75.5%) lymphadenectomies. The 5-year RFS was 69.2% with CRT versus 56.3% with CT (P = 0.038), and 5-year OS was 86.1% versus 78.9% (P = 0.357). Pelvic and para-aortic recurrence rates were significantly higher in the CT group (pelvic: 29.2%; para-aortic: 20.2%) than in the CRT group (pelvic: 10.5%; para-aortic: 6.3%). The CRT group showed a higher rate of distant recurrence (CRT, 23.2% vs. CT, 14.6%) however, the 5-year cumulative incidence of distant recurrence was not significantly different between the two groups (CRT, 28% vs. CT, 35%). CONCLUSIONS: This study highlights the potential benefits of adjuvant CRT in patients with stage III-IVA EC. The incorporation of molecular classification is necessary to derive optimal personalized adjuvant treatment strategies for this patient population.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Endometriales , Femenino , Humanos , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Quimioradioterapia , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Terapia Combinada , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Radioterapia AdyuvanteRESUMEN
Intensified preoperative chemotherapy after (chemo)radiotherapy, (Total Neoadjuvant Therapy-TNT), increases pathological complete response (pCR) rates and local control. In cases of clinically complete response (cCR) and close follow-up, non-operative management (NOM) is feasible. We report early outcomes and toxicities of a long-term TNT regime in a single-center cohort. Fifteen consecutive patients with distal or middle-third locally advanced rectal cancer (UICC stage II-III) were investigated, who received neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy (total adsorbed dose: 50.4 Gy in 28 fractions and two concomitant courses 5-fluorouracil (250 mg/m2/d)/oxaliplatin (50 mg/m2), followed by consolidating chemotherapy (nine courses of FOLFOX4). NOM was offered if staging revealed cCR 2 months after TNT, with resection performed otherwise. The primary endpoint was complete response (pCR + cCR). Treatment-related side effects were quantified for up two years after TNT. Ten patients achieved cCR, of whom five opted for NOM. Ten patients (five cCR and five non-cCR) underwent surgery, with pCR confirmed in the five patients with cCR. The main toxicities comprised leukocytopenia (13/15), fatigue (12/15) and polyneuropathy (11/15). The most relevant CTC °III + IV events were leukocytopenia (4/15), neutropenia (2/15) and diarrhea (1/15). The long-term TNT regime resulted in promising response rates that are higher than the response rates of short TNT regimes. Overall tolerability and toxicity were comparable with the results of prospective trials.
Asunto(s)
Leucopenia , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Estudios Prospectivos , Resultado del Tratamiento , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Neoplasias del Recto/tratamiento farmacológico , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Leucopenia/etiologíaRESUMEN
The relationship between total lymphocyte counts (TLCs) and survival is not well documented in rectal cancer. This study aimed to investigate the association between TLCs and disease-free survival (DFS) and identify factors associated with lymphopenia in locally advanced rectal cancer patients receiving chemoradiotherapy. Thirty-six patients with locally advanced rectal cancer were retrospectively analyzed. TLCs were evaluated before surgery (pre-S), before radiotherapy (pre-RT), and during concurrent chemoradiotherapy (CCRT). The relationship between TLCs and DFS was analyzed by univariate and multivariate analysis. Potential clinical factors associated with lymphopenia were also evaluated. Median TLC declined significantly during radiotherapy. Severe lymphopenia during CCRT was significantly associated with poorer DFS on Kaplan-Meier analysis (p = 0.01), univariate regression analysis (p = 0.036), and multivariate regression analysis (p = 0.038). Pre-S TLCs (p = 0.009) and pre-RT TLCs (p = 0.042) were significantly associated with severe lymphopenia on univariate regression analysis; however, only pre-S TLCs (p = 0.026) were significantly associated with severe lymphopenia on multivariate regression analysis. Severe lymphopenia was a predictor of poorer DFS in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer receiving adjuvant chemoradiotherapy. Pre-S TLCs were predictors of severe lymphopenia. Further study is warranted to reduce the rate of severe lymphopenia.
Asunto(s)
Linfopenia , Neoplasias Primarias Secundarias , Neoplasias del Recto , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Pronóstico , Linfopenia/etiología , Neoplasias del Recto/terapiaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: There are biological distinctions between gastric cancers from Eastern and Western nations, and therapeutic strategies may differ regionally. Perioperative chemotherapy, adjuvant chemotherapy, and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy (CRT) have all been demonstrated to be effective in the treatment of gastric cancer. The goal of this study was to do a meta-analysis of published studies that were eligible to see if adjuvant chemoradiotherapy was helpful for gastric cancer based on the cancer's histology. METHOD: From inception to May 4, 2022, manual searches were conducted to identify all eligible literature using the PubMed database for the published phase III clinical trial and a randomize-controlled trial testing the role of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy in operable gastric cancer. RESULTS: Two trials with a total of 1004 patients were selected as a result. Adjuvant CRT was found to have no effect on disease-free survival (DFS) in gastric cancer patients treated with D2 surgery (HR: 0.70 (0.62-1.02), p: 0.07). However, patients with intestinal-type gastric cancers exhibited significantly longer DFS (HR: 0.58 (0.37-0.92), p = 0.02). DISCUSSION: After D2 dissection, adjuvant CRT improved DFS in patients with intestinal-type gastric cancers but not in those with diffuse-type gastric cancers.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Gástricas , Humanos , Neoplasias Gástricas/terapia , Neoplasias Gástricas/patología , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Escisión del Ganglio Linfático , QuimioradioterapiaRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: We aimed to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the combination of 6 cycles of chemotherapy and radiation therapy compared with chemotherapy alone as postoperative adjuvant therapy for patients with stage III endometrial cancer. METHODS: This retrospective cohort study included patients with stage III endometrial cancer who received postoperative chemoradiotherapy or chemotherapy alone at 6 hospitals between January 2009 and December 2019. The progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) for each treatment group were analyzed using the Kaplan-Meier method. We also assessed differences in toxicity profiles between the treatment groups. RESULTS: A total of 133 patients met the inclusion criteria. Of these, 80 patients (60.2%) received adjuvant chemoradiotherapy and 53 (39.8%) received chemotherapy alone. The PFS and OS did not differ significantly between the groups. For patients with stage IIIC endometrioid subtype, the chemoradiotherapy group had significantly longer PFS rate than did the chemotherapy alone group (log-rank test, P = .019), although there was no significant difference in the OS (log-rank test, P = .100). CRT was identified as a favorable prognostic factor for PFS in multivariate analysis (adjusted HR, .37; 95% CI, .16-.87; P = .022). Patients treated with chemoradiotherapy more frequently suffered from grade 4 neutropenia (73.8% vs 52.8%; P = .018) and grade 3 or worse thrombocytopenia (36.3% vs 9.4%; P = .001) compared with the chemotherapy alone group. There were no differences between the 2 treatment groups in the frequency of toxicity-related treatment discontinuation or dose reduction. CONCLUSION: We confirmed that chemoradiotherapy yields longer progression-free survival than does chemotherapy alone for patients with stage IIIC endometrioid endometrial cancer, with an acceptable toxicity profile.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Endometriales , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Neoplasias Endometriales/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Endometriales/cirugía , Femenino , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Radioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
One of the most serious late side effects of irradiation is the promotion of tumorigenesis. Radiation-induced esophageal cancer (RIEC) can arise in a previously irradiated field, mostly in patients previously irradiated for thoracic malignancies such as breast cancer, Hodgkin and non-Hodgkin lymphomas, head and neck cancers, lung cancer, or previous esophageal cancer. RIEC is rare and accounts for less than 1% of all carcinomas of the esophagus. There are little data available in the current literature regarding pathogenesis, diagnosis, treatment, and outcome of esophageal cancer developed in a previously irradiated field. RIEC seems to represent a biologically aggressive disease with a poor prognosis. Although it is difficult to perform radical surgery on a previously irradiated field, R0 resection remains the mainstay of treatment. The use of neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemoradiotherapy remains very helpful in RIEC, similarly to conventional esophageal cancer protocols. The aim of this article is to elucidate this rare but challenging entity.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Neoplasias Esofágicas/etiología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/etiología , PronósticoRESUMEN
Objective: Although adjuvant therapy has been shown to be beneficial in gastric cancer, the use of adjuvant chemoradiotherapy remains controversial. This paper investigated the effects of postoperative adjuvant chemoradiotherapy on the survival of patients with stage III gastric cancer. Methods: In total, the data of 72 stage III gastric cancer patients treated at our hospital from January 2014 to December 2019 were retrieved and assessed. They were categorized into a chemotherapy group (CT group) and a radiochemotherapy group (RCT group) according to their given treatment regimens. A 3-year follow-up was conducted to record their incidence of disease-free survival (DFS), overall survival (OS), and adverse events. Results: For the CT and RCT groups, DFS was 86.4% and 92.6% in the first year, decreasing to 55.1% and 73.7% in the second year, and 41.3% and 69.1% in the third year. There was no significant difference in DFS between the two groups during the three-year follow-up. Additionally, for the CT and RCT groups, their respective 1-year, 2-year, and 3-year OS were 95.6% and 96.3%, 75.1% and 87.9%, and 50.3% and 74.2%, indicating that the OS of patients in the RCT group was significantly higher than that in the CT group during 3 years of follow-up. Further, no significant difference in the incidence of adverse events was found between the two treatment groups. Conclusions: Collectively, adjuvant radiochemotherapy after radical gastrectomy for stage III gastric cancer was associated with better survival outcomes than chemotherapy, without increase in adverse events.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Gástricas , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica/uso terapéutico , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Quimioterapia Adyuvante , Gastrectomía , Humanos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Neoplasias Gástricas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Gástricas/patologíaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Patients with human papillomavirus oropharyngeal cancer are highly curable but risk significant long-term toxic effects with standard therapy. This study investigated a de-escalation strategy of decreased adjuvant radiation therapy and chemotherapy after transoral robotic surgery, and reports on long-term functional and quality of life (QOL) outcomes. METHODS AND MATERIALS: Eligible patients had a p16-positive oropharyngeal cancer and ≤10 pack-year smoking history and underwent surgery followed by treatment with either 30 Gy delivered in 1.5-Gy fractions twice per day over 2 weeks with weekly docetaxel (15 mg/m2) if they had intermediate pathologic risk factors or 36 Gy in 1.8-Gy fractions twice per day over 2 weeks with the same chemotherapy if they had extranodal extension. Toxic effects, swallow function, and QOL were measured longitudinally. RESULTS: Seventy-nine patients (89.9% male) were treated and eligible for toxic effect and functional evaluation. Dry mouth was the most common grade 1 toxic effect at 1 year (55.6%), 2 years (53.3%), and 3 years (49.2%). The cumulative rates of grade 2 toxic effects at 1, 2, and 3 years were 1.4%, 6.7%, and 6.8%, respectively. There were only 2 grade 3 toxic effects at ≥1 year, including a grade 3 fatigue at 2.5 years, and a grade 3 superficial soft tissue fibrosis at 4 years. There were no grade 4 to 5 toxic effects. No patients were percutaneous endoscopic gastrostomy-dependent. Swallow function improved by 12 months posttreatment. QOL improved over time by all measurement tools and most patients returned to baseline level of function and QOL. CONCLUSIONS: De-escalated adjuvant therapy for select patients with human papillomavirus oropharyngeal cancer resulted in low rates of long-term toxic effects, excellent swallow outcomes, and preservation of global and xerostomia-related QOL.
Asunto(s)
Alphapapillomavirus , Neoplasias Orofaríngeas , Infecciones por Papillomavirus , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/métodos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Papillomaviridae , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/complicaciones , Infecciones por Papillomavirus/terapia , Calidad de VidaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Trimodal therapy is frequently used for patients with locally advanced, resectable oesophageal cancer. However, it does not provide a satisfactory prognosis. The neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) is an important indicator of patients' inflammatory and immune statuses. We investigated the prognostic role of NLR values obtained at different treatment stages in patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We evaluated the correlation between NLR values or their change and prognosis at each treatment point (before chemoradiotherapy; before surgery; and at 14 days, and 1 and 2 months postoperatively) in 163 patients with oesophageal squamous cell carcinoma who underwent oesophagectomy after neoadjuvant chemoradiotherapy from April 2003 to August 2018. The outcomes studied were overall (OS) and relapse-free (RFS) survival. RESULTS: The NLR at 1 month postoperatively showed the strongest correlation with prognosis, with an optimal cut-off value of 4.5 (area under the curve=0.7878; 95% confidence interval=0.70-0.85; p<0.0001). Univariate and multivariate analyses showed that NLR ≥4.5 was a significant factor for both RFS (hazard ratio=4.44, 95% confidence interval=2.69-7.34) and OS (hazard ratio=3.88, 95% confidence interval=2.38-6.32). Furthermore, NLR significantly stratified patients for the RFS and OS regardless of the pathological response (complete/non-complete response) and postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo grade Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante
, Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía
, Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/cirugía
, Esofagectomía
, Linfocitos/inmunología
, Terapia Neoadyuvante
, Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia
, Neutrófilos/inmunología
, Anciano
, Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos
, Neoplasias Esofágicas/inmunología
, Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología
, Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/inmunología
, Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología
, Esofagectomía/efectos adversos
, Femenino
, Humanos
, Recuento de Linfocitos
, Masculino
, Persona de Mediana Edad
, Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos
, Valor Predictivo de las Pruebas
, Supervivencia sin Progresión
, Estudios Retrospectivos
, Medición de Riesgo
, Factores de Riesgo
, Factores de Tiempo
RESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Histopathological tumor regression grade is applied not to lymph nodes but primary tumors modified by preoperative treatments. This study focused on patients whose pathological examination at the time of surgery showed no residual tumor after chemo(radio)therapy in the primary lesion (ypT0) or lymph nodes (ypN0). PATIENTS AND METHODS: A total of 87 patients with clinical stage II/III thoracic esophageal cancer underwent esophagectomy following preoperative treatments to evaluate significances between pathological response and clinical outcomes; 51 patients with clinically definitive lymph node metastasis (cN+) were analyzed as a subgroup. RESULTS: ypT0 rates were 20.7% and 23.5%, and ypN0 rates were 47.1% and 27.5% in the whole cohort and in the cN+ subgroup, respectively. Disease-free survival, from surgery to relapse or death, was significantly influenced by ypN status (p=0.035) but not by ypT status in the 51 patients with definitive cN+ disease. Preoperative chemoradiation was an independent favorable factor for achievement of ypN0 in the 51 patients (odds ratio=0.09; p=0.007). CONCLUSION: ypN status was a predictive factor for DFS in patients treated with docetaxel plus low-dose 5-fluorouracil and cisplatin combined chemotherapy, superior to ypT status, especially in patients with definitive cN+ disease.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas/cirugía , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/cirugía , Esofagectomía , Ganglios Linfáticos/cirugía , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Protocolos de Quimioterapia Combinada Antineoplásica , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Cisplatino/administración & dosificación , Cisplatino/efectos adversos , Supervivencia sin Enfermedad , Neoplasias Esofágicas/tratamiento farmacológico , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/radioterapia , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/tratamiento farmacológico , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/patología , Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Esófago/radioterapia , Femenino , Fluorouracilo/administración & dosificación , Fluorouracilo/efectos adversos , Humanos , Ganglios Linfáticos/efectos de los fármacos , Ganglios Linfáticos/patología , Ganglios Linfáticos/efectos de la radiación , Metástasis Linfática , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Clasificación del Tumor , Cuidados Preoperatorios/efectos adversosRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Although cure rates in esophageal cancer (EC) have improved since the introduction of neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT), evidence for treatment-related cardiac toxicity is growing, of which the exact mechanisms remain unknown. The primary objective of this study was to identify (subclinical) cardiac dysfunction in EC patients after nCRT followed by surgical resection as compared to surgery alone. MATERIALS AND METHODS: EC survivors followed for 5-15 years after curative resection with (n = 20) or without (n = 20) nCRT were enrolled in this prospective cross-sectional pilot study. All patients underwent several clinical and diagnostic tests in order to objectify (sub)clinical cardiac toxicity including cardiac CT and MRI, echocardiography, ECG, 6-minutes walking test, physical examination and EORTC questionnaires. RESULTS: We found an increased rate of myocardial fibrosis (Linear late gadolinium enhancement (LGE) 4 vs. 1; p = 0.13; mean extracellular volume (ECV) 28.4 vs. 24.0; p < 0.01), atrial fibrillation (AF) (6 vs. 2; p = 0.07) and conduction changes in ECG among patients treated with nCRT as compared to those treated with surgery alone. The results suggested an impact on quality of life in terms of worse role functioning for this patient group (95.0 vs. 88.8; p = 0.03). CONCLUSION: Based on our analyses we hypothesize that in EC patients, radiation-induced myocardial fibrosis plays a central role in cardiac toxicity leading to AF, conduction changes and ultimately to decreased role functioning. The results emphasize the need to verify these findings in larger cohorts of patients.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias Esofágicas , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Cardiotoxicidad/etiología , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Medios de Contraste , Estudios Transversales , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Fibrosis , Gadolinio , Humanos , Terapia Neoadyuvante/métodos , Proyectos Piloto , Estudios Prospectivos , Calidad de Vida , SobrevivientesRESUMEN
Immunotherapy is a new anti-cancer treatment option, showing promising results in clinical trials. To investigate potential immune biomarkers in esophageal adenocarcinoma (EAC), we explored immune landscape patterns in the tumor microenvironment before and after neoadjuvant chemoradiation (nCRT). Sections from matched pretreatment biopsies and post-nCRT resection specimens (n = 188) were stained for (1) programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1, CD274); (2) programmed cell death protein 1 (PD-1, CD279), forkhead box P3 (FOXP3), CD8, pan-cytokeratin multiplex; and (3) an MHC class I, II duplex. The densities of tumor-associated immune cells (TAICs) were calculated using digital image analyses and correlated to histopathological nCRT response [tumor regression grade (TRG)], survival, and post-nCRT immune patterns. PD-L1 positivity defined by a combined positive score of >1 was associated with a better response post-nCRT (TRG 1-3 versus 4, 5, p = 0.010). In addition, high combined mean densities of CD8+ , FOXP3+ , and PD-1+ TAICs in the tumor epithelium and stroma of biopsies were associated with a better response (TRG 1-3 versus 4, 5, p = 0.025 and p = 0.044, respectively). Heterogeneous TAIC density patterns were observed post-nCRT, with significantly higher CD8+ and PD-1+ TAIC mean densities compared with biopsies (both p = 0.000). Three immune landscape patterns were defined post-nCRT: 'inflamed', 'invasive margin', and 'desert', of which 'inflamed' was the most frequent (57%). Compared with matched biopsies, resection specimens with 'inflamed' tumors showed a significantly higher increase in CD8+ density compared with non-inflamed tumors post-nCRT (p = 0.000). In this cohort of EAC patients, higher TAIC densities in pretreatment biopsies were associated with response to nCRT. This warrants future research into the potential of the tumor-immune landscape for patient stratification and novel (immune) therapeutic strategies. © 2021 The Authors. The Journal of Pathology published by John Wiley & Sons, Ltd on behalf of The Pathological Society of Great Britain and Ireland.
Asunto(s)
Adenocarcinoma/terapia , Linfocitos T CD8-positivos/inmunología , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Neoplasias Esofágicas/terapia , Esofagectomía , Linfocitos Infiltrantes de Tumor/inmunología , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Microambiente Tumoral/inmunología , Adenocarcinoma/química , Adenocarcinoma/inmunología , Adenocarcinoma/patología , Biomarcadores de Tumor/análisis , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Bases de Datos Factuales , Neoplasias Esofágicas/química , Neoplasias Esofágicas/inmunología , Neoplasias Esofágicas/patología , Esofagectomía/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
We aimed to evaluate whether a short distal resection margin (< 1 cm) was associated with local recurrence in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy. Patients with rectal cancer who underwent preoperative chemoradiotherapy followed by curative surgery were divided into two groups based on the distal resection margin (≥ 1 cm and < 1 cm). In total, 507 patients were analyzed. The median follow-up duration was 48.9 months. The 3-year local recurrence rates were 2% and 8% in the ≥ 1 cm and < 1 cm groups, respectively (P < 0.001). Multivariable analysis revealed that a distal resection margin of < 1 cm was a significant risk factor for local recurrence (P = 0.008). Subgroup analysis revealed that a distal resection margin of < 1 cm was not an independent risk factor for local recurrence in the ypT0-1 group. However, among patients with tumor stages ypT2-4, the cumulative 3-year incidences of local recurrence were 2.3% and 9.8% in the ≥ 1 cm and < 1 cm groups, respectively (P = 0.01). A distal resection margin of < 1 cm might influence local recurrence rates in patients with locally advanced rectal cancer undergoing preoperative chemoradiotherapy, especially in patients with tumor stages ypT2-4.
Asunto(s)
Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo , Terapia Neoadyuvante , Recurrencia Local de Neoplasia , Neoplasias del Recto/terapia , Anciano , Quimioradioterapia Adyuvante/efectos adversos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Digestivo/efectos adversos , Femenino , Humanos , Masculino , Márgenes de Escisión , Persona de Mediana Edad , Terapia Neoadyuvante/efectos adversos , Estadificación de Neoplasias , Neoplasias del Recto/patología , Estudios Retrospectivos , Medición de Riesgo , Factores de Riesgo , Factores de Tiempo , Resultado del TratamientoRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Survival benefit of adjuvant radiotherapy for locally advanced gastric cancer following gastrectomy plus D2 lymphadenectomy has always been controversial. Esophagogastric junction (EGJ) adenocarcinoma, which is usually classified as gastric cancer in East Asia, often has a higher locoregional recurrence rate after operation because of its special anatomical characteristics. The aim of this study is to determine whether adjuvant radiotherapy can improve survival of locally advanced EGJ adenocarcinoma after D2 radical resection. METHODS: In this phase III, randomized, open label, controlled trial, we plan to recruit 378 patients with Siewert type II and III adenocarcinoma of EGJ, who had undergone transabdominal radical surgery and D2 lymphadenectomy, and were divided into pathological stage IIB to IIIC. All patients will be randomized 1:1 to receive either adjuvant chemotherapy alone (control group) or adjuvant chemotherapy plus chemoradiotherapy (experimental group). Patients allocated to control group will receive eight cycles of S-1 plus oxaliplatin (SOX), while the experimental group will receive two cycles of SOX followed by 45-Gy RT combined with S-1 and four additional cycles of SOX. The primary endpoint is 3-year disease-free survival rate (DFS). The secondary endpoints are 3-year overall survival rate (OS), 3-year locoregional recurrence-free survival rate (LRFS), 3-year distant metastasis-free survival rate (DMFS), and quality of life (QoL). DISCUSSION: In the past, the adjuvant treatment of EGJ adenocarcinoma needs to draw on the experience of esophageal adenocarcinoma or gastric adenocarcinoma. In this study, EGJ adenocarcinoma is considered as an independent disease, and the conclusion will provide evidence for optimal adjuvant therapy of locally advanced EGJ adenocarcinoma after D2 radical resection. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT03973008 . Registered on 1 June 2019 (retrospectively registered), URL: https://clinicaltrials.gov/ct2/show/NCT03973008?term=NCT03973008&draw=2&rank=1.