BRAF/MEK-targeted therapy in BRAF ex15 p.T599dup mutation-driven NSCLC: a case report.

BRAF mutations are found in 1-5% of non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC), with V600 and non-V600 accounting for approximately 50% each. It has been confirmed that targeted therapy with dabrafenib + trametinib is effective in patients with metastatic NSCLC carrying BRAF V600E mutations. Preclinical studies have shown that dabrafenib + trametinib may also have inhibitory effects on some types of non-V600E mutations, especially some class II BRAF mutations. However, the efficacy of dabrafenib + trametinib on non-V600E mutant NSCLC in clinical practice only exists in some case reports. Here, we report a case of NSCLC patient carrying BRAF ex15 p.T599dup, who showed a clinical response to the combined therapy of dabrafenib + trametinib.

Identification of COQ2 as a regulator of proliferation and lipid peroxidation through genome-scale CRISPR-Cas9 screening in myeloma cells.

Multiple myeloma (MM) is the second most common malignant haematological disease with a poor prognosis. The limit therapeutic progress has been made in MM patients with cancer relapse, necessitating deeper research into the molecular mechanisms underlying its occurrence and development. A genome-wide CRISPR-Cas9 loss-of-function screening was utilized to identify potential therapeutic targets in our research. We revealed that COQ2 plays a crucial role in regulating MM cell proliferation and lipid peroxidation (LPO). Knockout of COQ2 inhibited cell proliferation, induced cell cycle arrest and reduced tumour growth in vivo. Mechanistically, COQ2 promoted the activation of the MEK/ERK cascade, which in turn stabilized and activated MYC protein. Moreover, we found that COQ2-deficient MM cells increased sensitivity to the LPO activator, RSL3. Using an inhibitor targeting COQ2 by 4-CBA enhanced the sensitivity to RSL3 in primary CD138+ myeloma cells and in a xenograft mouse model. Nevertheless, co-treatment of 4-CBA and RSL3 induced cell death in bortezomib-resistant MM cells. Together, our findings suggest that COQ2 promotes cell proliferation and tumour growth through the activation of the MEK/ERK/MYC axis and targeting COQ2 could enhance the sensitivity to ferroptosis in MM cells, which may be a promising therapeutic strategy for the treatment of MM patients.

Glycolysis-non-canonical glutamine dual-metabolism regulation nanodrug enhanced the phototherapy effect for pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma treatment.

Clinical pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) treatment is severely limited by lack of effective KRAS suppression strategies. To address this dilemma, a reactive oxygen species (ROS)-responsive and PDAC-targeted nanodrug named Z/B-PLS was constructed to confront KRAS through dual-blockade of its downstream PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAF/MEK/ERK for enhanced PDAC treatment. Specifically, photosensitizer zinc phthalocyanine (ZnPc) and PI3K/mTOR inhibitor BEZ235 (BEZ) were co-loaded into PLS which was constructed by click chemistry conjugating MEK inhibitor selumetinib (SEL) to low molecular weight heparin with ROS-responsive oxalate bond. The BEZ and SEL blocked PI3K/AKT/mTOR and RAF/MEK/ERK respectively to remodel glycolysis and non-canonical glutamine metabolism. ZnPc mediated photodynamic therapy (PDT) could enhance drug release through ROS generation, further facilitating KRAS downstream dual-blockade to create treatment-promoting drug delivery-therapeutic positive feedback. Benefiting from this broad metabolic modulation cascade, the metabolic symbiosis between normoxic and hypoxic tumor cells was also cut off simultaneously and effective tumor vascular normalization effects could be achieved. As a result, PDT was dramatically promoted through glycolysis-non-canonical glutamine dual-metabolism regulation, achieving complete elimination of tumors in vivo. Above all, this study achieved effective multidimensional metabolic modulation based on integrated smart nanodrug delivery, helping overcome the therapeutic challenges posed by KRAS mutations of PDAC.

Multiplex single-cell chemical genomics reveals the kinase dependence of the response to targeted therapy.

Chemical genetic screens are a powerful tool for exploring how cancer cells' response to drugs is shaped by their mutations, yet they lack a molecular view of the contribution of individual genes to the response to exposure. Here, we present sci-Plex-Gene-by-Environment (sci-Plex-GxE), a platform for combined single-cell genetic and chemical screening at scale. We highlight the advantages of large-scale, unbiased screening by defining the contribution of each of 522 human kinases to the response of glioblastoma to different drugs designed to abrogate signaling from the receptor tyrosine kinase pathway. In total, we probed 14,121 gene-by-environment combinations across 1,052,205 single-cell transcriptomes. We identify an expression signature characteristic of compensatory adaptive signaling regulated in a MEK/MAPK-dependent manner. Further analyses aimed at preventing adaptation revealed promising combination therapies, including dual MEK and CDC7/CDK9 or nuclear factor κB (NF-κB) inhibitors, as potent means of preventing transcriptional adaptation of glioblastoma to targeted therapy.

Pancreatic cancer acquires resistance to MAPK pathway inhibition by clonal expansion and adaptive DNA hypermethylation.

BACKGROUND: Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) is an aggressive cancer with poor prognosis. It is marked by extraordinary resistance to conventional therapies including chemotherapy and radiation, as well as to essentially all targeted therapies evaluated so far. More than 90% of PDAC cases harbor an activating KRAS mutation. As the most common KRAS variants in PDAC remain undruggable so far, it seemed promising to inhibit a downstream target in the MAPK pathway such as MEK1/2, but up to now preclinical and clinical evaluation of MEK inhibitors (MEKi) failed due to inherent and acquired resistance mechanisms. To gain insights into molecular changes during the formation of resistance to oncogenic MAPK pathway inhibition, we utilized short-term passaged primary tumor cells from ten PDACs of genetically engineered mice. We followed gain and loss of resistance upon MEKi exposure and withdrawal by longitudinal integrative analysis of whole genome sequencing, whole genome bisulfite sequencing, RNA-sequencing and mass spectrometry data. RESULTS: We found that resistant cell populations under increasing MEKi treatment evolved by the expansion of a single clone but were not a direct consequence of known resistance-conferring mutations. Rather, resistant cells showed adaptive DNA hypermethylation of 209 and hypomethylation of 8 genomic sites, most of which overlap with regulatory elements known to be active in murine PDAC cells. Both DNA methylation changes and MEKi resistance were transient and reversible upon drug withdrawal. Furthermore, MEKi resistance could be reversed by DNA methyltransferase inhibition with remarkable sensitivity exclusively in the resistant cells. CONCLUSION: Overall, the concept of acquired therapy resistance as a result of the expansion of a single cell clone with epigenetic plasticity sheds light on genetic, epigenetic and phenotypic patterns during evolvement of treatment resistance in a tumor with high adaptive capabilities and provides potential for reversion through epigenetic targeting.

[Progress of BRAF Gene Alteration in Non-small Cell Lung Cancer].

V-Raf murine sarcoma viral oncogene homolog B (BRAF) alteration is one of the most essential driver genes of non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). BRAF encodes serine/threonine protein kinases, and its mutations typically lead to protein compositional activation, thereby activating the mitogen-activated protein kinase kinase (MEK) signaling pathway. A promising new approach for the treatment of mutated BRAF and/or downstream MEK may provide customized treatment opportunities for BRAF driven NSCLC patients. However, combination therapy is necessary to overcome the difficulties such as short duration of benefit, poor therapeutic effect of non-V600 BRAF mutations and susceptibility to drug resistance. This article reviewed the progress in structural characteristics, related signaling pathways, mutation types of BRAF gene, and the clinical pathological relationship between BRAF mutations and NSCLC, as well as the therapy, in order to provide more evidences for clinical doctors to make treatment decisions.
.

Articles from 2022 to 2023 to Inform Your Cancer Practice: Melanoma.

Modern effective systemic therapy for melanoma includes two important classes of treatment: immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs), comprising inhibitors of cytotoxic T-lymphocyte antigen 4, programmed cell death receptor 1, and lymphocyte-activation gene 3; and small molecule BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy. These treatments have revolutionized the management of patients with advanced melanoma and have dramatically improved clinical outcomes. The melanoma treatment landscape continues to evolve as outcome data from completed trials continue to mature and as newer studies begin to report data. In 2022 and 2023, longer-term follow-up data for established single-agent ICI therapy has been published improving our understanding of both efficacy and durability of treatment responses. A trial of a novel combination ICI therapy has demonstrated enhanced efficacy, and a study examining the order/sequence of ICI therapy versus BRAF/MEK inhibitor therapy for first-line treatment of metastatic melanoma showed that survival is improved when patients start with ICI therapy. As the indications for these therapies have expanded to the adjuvant and neoadjuvant space, we also saw the publication of 5-year results of adjuvant therapy in resected stage III patients, new data on the role of adjuvant therapy in resected stage IIB and IIC patients, and, finally, a practice-changing trial demonstrating improved outcomes using a neoadjuvant approach for patients with macroscopic disease amenable to surgical resection. In this article, we review these articles and highlight key elements for surgical oncologists.

Clinical Outcomes of Radioactive Iodine Redifferentiation Therapy in Previously Iodine Refractory Differentiated Thyroid Cancers.

Objective: Redifferentiation therapy (RDT) can restore radioactive iodine (RAI) uptake in differentiated thyroid cancer (DTC) cells to enable salvage 131I therapy for previously RAI refractory (RAIR) disease. This study evaluated the clinical outcomes of patients who underwent RDT and identified clinicopathologic characteristics predictive of RAI restoration following RDT. Methods: This is a retrospective case series of 33 patients with response evaluation criteria in solid tumors (RECIST)-progressive metastatic RAIR-DTC who underwent RDT between 2017 and 2022 at the Mayo Clinic (Rochester, MN). All patients underwent genomic profiling and received MEK, RET or ALK inhibitors alone, or combination BRAF-MEK inhibitors for 4 weeks. At week 3, those with increased RAI avidity in metastatic foci received high-dose 131I therapy. Baseline and clinicopathologic outcomes were comprehensively reviewed. Results: Of the 33 patients, 57.6% had restored RAI uptake following RDT (Redifferentiated subgroup). 42.1% (8/19) with papillary thyroid cancers (PTC), 100% (4/4) with invasive encapsulated follicular variant PTCs (IEFV-PTCs), and 100% (7/7) with follicular thyroid cancers (FTC) redifferentiated. All (11/11) RAS mutant tumors redifferentiated compared with 38.9% (7/18) with BRAF mutant disease (6 PTC and 1 IEFV-PTC). 76.5% (13/17) of redifferentiated and 66.7% (8/12) of non-redifferentiated patients achieved a best overall RECIST response of stable disease (SD) or non-complete response/non-progressive disease. Both subgroups had a median 12% tumor shrinkage at 3 weeks on drug(s) alone. The redifferentiated subgroup, following high-dose 131I therapy, achieved an additional median 20% tumor reduction at 6 months after RDT. There were no statistically significant differences between both groups in progression free survival (PFS), time to initiation of systemic therapy, and time to any additional therapy. Of the entire cohort, 6.1% (2/33) experienced histologic transformation to anaplastic thyroid cancer, 15.1% (5/33) died, and all had redifferentiated following RDT and received 131I therapy. Conclusion: RDT has the potential to restore RAI avidity and induce RECIST responses following 131I therapy in select patients with RAIR-DTC, particularly those with RAS-driven "follicular" phenotypes. In patients with PTC, none of the evaluated clinical outcomes differed statistically between the redifferentiated and non-redifferentiated subgroups. Further studies are needed to better characterize the long-term survival and/or safety outcomes of high-dose RAI following RDT, particularly whether it could be associated with histologic anaplastic transformation.

Treatment of Recurrent Low-grade Serous Ovarian Cancer With MEK Inhibitors: A Systematic Review.

OBJECTIVE: Low-grade serous ovarian cancer (LGSC) represents 5% of all epithelial ovarian cancers. They are characterized by indolent growth and KRAS and BRAF mutations, differing from high-grade serous ovarian cancer both clinically and molecularly. LGSC has low response rates to traditional systemic therapies, including chemotherapy and hormonal therapy. The objective of this systematic review was to appraise the literature describing the efficacy of MEK inhibitors in the treatment of LGSC. METHODS: A comprehensive search was conducted of the following databases: Medline ALL, EMBASE, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, Web of Sciences, ClinicalTrials.gov, International Clinical Trials Registry Platform (ICFRP), and International Standard Randomized Controlled Trials Number (ISRCTN) Registry. All studies investigating MEKi in the treatment of LGSC in the adjuvant or recurrent setting for patients 18 years of age or older were included. All titles/abstracts were then screened by 2 independent reviewers (A.K. and C.C.). The full-text articles were then screened. All disagreements were resolved by a third independent reviewer (T.Z.). Two independent reviewers (A.K. and C.C.) extracted data from the studies deemed eligible for final review. RESULTS: A total of 2108 studies were identified in the initial search. Of these, a total of 4 studies met the eligibility criteria for systematic review. In these studies, 416 patients were treated with an MEKi alone. All patients included in the studies were being treated for LGSC in the recurrent setting. Varied results and efficacy of the MEKi were reported in each study. CONCLUSIONS: The results highlighted in this systematic review demonstrate varied responses to MEKi for recurrent LGSC. Further research is needed in this field comparing the efficacy to current therapies, as well as to further evaluate the safety and toxicity profile with long-term use of MEKi.

Inhibition of MEK Signaling Attenuates Cancer Stem Cell Activity in Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer.

Background: Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is highly aggressive and has very limited treatment options. Recent studies suggest that cancer stem cell (CSC) activity in ATC could underlie this recurrence and resistance to treatment. The recent approval by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration of the combined treatment of BRAF and MEK inhibitors for ATC patients has shown some efficacy in patients harboring the BRAFV600E mutation. However, it was unknown whether the combined treatment could affect the CSC activity. This study explores the effects of the BRAF and MEK inhibitors on CSC activity in human ATC cells. Methods: Using three human ATC cells, THJ-11T, THJ-16T, and 8505C cells, we evaluated the effects of dabrafenib (a BRAF kinase inhibitor), trametinib (an MEK inhibitor), or a combined treatment of the two drugs on the CSC activity by tumorsphere formation, Aldefluor assays, expression profiles of key CSC markers, immunohistochemistry, and in vivo xenograft mouse models. Furthermore, we also used confocal imaging to directly visualize the effects on drugs on CSCs by the SORE6-mCherry reporter in cultured cells and xenograft tumor cells. Results: The BRAF inhibitor, dabrafenib, had weak efficacy, while the MEK inhibitor, trametinib, showed strong efficacy in attenuating the CSC activity, as evidenced by suppression of CSC marker expression, tumorsphere formation, and Aldefluor assays. Using ATC cells expressing a fluorescent CSC SORE6 reporter, we showed reduction of CSC activity in the rank order of combined > trametinib > dabrafenib through in vitro and in vivo xenograft models. Molecular analyses showed that suppression of CSC activity by these drugs was, in part, mediated by attenuation of the transcription by dampening the RNA polymerase II activity. Conclusions: Our analyses demonstrated the presence of CSCs in ATC cells. The inhibition of CSC activity by the MEK signaling could partially account for the efficacy of the combined treatment shown in ATC patients. However, our studies also showed that not all CSC activity was totally abolished, which may account for the recurrence observed in ATC patients. Our findings have provided new insights into the molecular basis of efficacy and limitations of these drugs in ATC patients.

Demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy during dabrafenib and trametinib treatment for metastatic melanoma: A case report.

BACKGROUND: Melanoma is an aggressive malignancy, historically characterized with a poor prognosis and few treatment options. The advent of target therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors, as well as immunotherapy, changed this scenario and improved the prognosis of patients with BRAF V600E mutation. These therapies are generally well tolerated. Neurological toxicities, especially polyradiculopathy, are very rare with BRAF inhibitors and MEK inhibitors although some cases have been described in recent years, regardless of the type of target therapies combination used. CASE REPORT: We report the case of a patient with BRAF V600E-mutated metastatic melanoma treated with dabrafenib and trametinib who has developed a demyelinating polyradiculoneuropathy. CONCLUSION: This case, once more, should draw our attention to the possibility of rare, but potentially serious side effects, even in the case of generally well-tolerated treatments. Especially in the presence of side effects, it is important a close relationship between clinicians and patients for the management of adverse events and the choice of the best treatment strategy.

Simvastatin Preferentially Targets FLT3/ITD Acute Myeloid Leukemia by Inhibiting MEK/ERK and p38-MAPK Signaling Pathways.

BACKGROUND: The FLT3/ITD mutation exists in many acute myeloid leukemia (AML) patients and is related to the poor prognosis of patients. In this study, we attempted to evaluate the antitumor activity of simvastatin, a member of the statin class of drugs, in vitro and in vivo models of FLT3/ITD AML and to identify the potential mechanisms. METHODS: Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) and Annexin V/propidium iodide (PI) staining kits were used to detect cell viability and apoptosis, respectively. Subsequently, Western blot and rescue experiment were applied to explore the potential molecular mechanism. In vivo anti-leukemia activity of simvastatin was evaluated in xenograft mouse models. RESULTS: In vitro experiments revealed that simvastatin inhibited AML progression in a dose- and time-dependent manner, while in vivo experiments showed that simvastatin significantly reduced tumor burden in FLT3/ITD xenograft mouse models. After simvastatin treatment of FLT3/ITD AML cells, intracellular Rap1 was downregulated and the phosphorylation levels of its downstream targets MEK, ERK and p38 were significantly inhibited. The rescue experiment showed that mevalonate, an intermediate product of the metabolic pathway of mevalonate, and its downstream geranylgeranyl pyrophosphate (GGPP) played a key role in this process. Finally, we demonstrate that simvastatin can induce apoptosis of primary AML cells, while having no effect on peripheral blood mononuclear cells from normal donors. CONCLUSIONS: Simvastatin can selectively and effectively eradicate FLT3/ITD AML cells in vitro and in vivo, and its mechanism may be related to the disruption of the HMG-CoA reductase pathway and the downregulation of the MEK/ERK and p38-MAPK signaling pathways.

Potential drug-drug interactions with mitogen-activated protein kinase (MEK) inhibitors used to treat melanoma.

INTRODUCTION: The management of patients with BRAF-mutated advanced melanoma who are undergoing targeted therapy with MEK inhibitors can be complicated by the co-administration of multiple medications, which can give rise to drug-drug interactions of clinical significance. COVERED AREAS: Our review presents a comprehensive analysis of the pharmacokinetic and pharmacodynamic interactions of the three approved for advanced melanoma MEK inhibitor drugs - binimetinib, cobimetinib, and trametinib. MEDLINE (PubMed) was utilized for the literature search, comprising clinical studies, observational studies, and preclinical research. The review discusses the impact of these interactions on efficacy and safety of the treatments and differentiates between interactions supported by pharmacokinetic or pharmacodynamic mechanisms, those encountered in clinical practice, and those observed in preclinical studies. EXPERT OPINION: Physicians should be aware about potential benefits, but also increased toxicity caused by drug interactions between MEK inhibitors and other drugs in the management of patients with metastatic melanoma.

Combination BRAFV600E Inhibition with the Multitargeting Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitor Axitinib Shows Additive Anticancer Activity in BRAFV600E-Mutant Anaplastic Thyroid Cancer.

Background: Anaplastic thyroid cancer (ATC) is uniformly lethal. BRAFV600E mutation is present in 45% of patients with ATC. Targeted therapy with combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in BRAFV600E-mutant ATC can be effective, but acquired resistance is common because this combination targets the same pathway. Drug matrix screening, in BRAFV600E ATC cells, of highly active compounds in combination with BRAF inhibition showed multitargeting tyrosine kinase inhibitors (MTKIs) had the highest synergistic/additive activity. Thus, we hypothesized that the combination of BRAFV600E inhibition and an MTKI is more effective than a single drug or combined BRAF and MEK inhibition in BRAFV600E-mutant ATC. We evaluated the effect of BRAFV600E inhibitors in combination with the MTKI axitinib and its mechanism(s) of action. Methods: We evaluated the effects of BRAFV600E inhibitors and axitinib alone and in combination in in vitro and in vivo models of BRAFV600E-mutant and wild-type ATC. Results: The combination of axitinib and BRAFV600E inhibitors (dabrafenib and PLX4720) showed an additive effect on inhibiting cell proliferation based on the Chou-Talalay algorithm in BRAFV600E-mutant ATC cell lines. This combination also significantly inhibited cell invasion and migration (p < 0.001) compared with the control. Dabrafenib and PLX4720 arrested ATC cells in the G0/G1 phase. Axitinib arrested ATC cells in the G2/M phase by decreasing phosphorylation of aurora kinase B (Thr232) and histone H3 (Ser10) proteins and by upregulating the c-JUN signaling pathway. The combination of BRAF inhibition and axitinib significantly inhibited tumor growth and was associated with improved survival in an orthotopic ATC model. Conclusions: The novel combination of axitinib and BRAFV600E inhibition enhanced anticancer activity in in vitro and in vivo models of BRAFV600E-mutant ATC. This combination may have clinical utility in BRAFV600E-mutant ATC that is refractory to current standard therapy, namely combined BRAF and MEK inhibition.

The cardiac glycoside ZINC253504760 induces parthanatos-type cell death and G2/M arrest via downregulation of MEK1/2 phosphorylation in leukemia cells.

Overcoming multidrug resistance (MDR) represents a major obstacle in cancer chemotherapy. Cardiac glycosides (CGs) are efficient in the treatment of heart failure and recently emerged in a new role in the treatment of cancer. ZINC253504760, a synthetic cardenolide that is structurally similar to well-known GCs, digitoxin and digoxin, has not been investigated yet. This study aims to investigate the cytotoxicity of ZINC253504760 on MDR cell lines and its molecular mode of action for cancer treatment. Four drug-resistant cell lines (P-glycoprotein-, ABCB5-, and EGFR-overexpressing cells, and TP53-knockout cells) did not show cross-resistance to ZINC253504760 except BCRP-overexpressing cells. Transcriptomic profiling indicated that cell death and survival as well as cell cycle (G2/M damage) were the top cellular functions affected by ZINC253504760 in CCRF-CEM cells, while CDK1 was linked with the downregulation of MEK and ERK. With flow cytometry, ZINC253504760 induced G2/M phase arrest. Interestingly, ZINC253504760 induced a novel state-of-the-art mode of cell death (parthanatos) through PARP and PAR overexpression as shown by western blotting, apoptosis-inducing factor (AIF) translocation by immunofluorescence, DNA damage by comet assay, and mitochondrial membrane potential collapse by flow cytometry. These results were ROS-independent. Furthermore, ZINC253504760 is an ATP-competitive MEK inhibitor evidenced by its interaction with the MEK phosphorylation site as shown by molecular docking in silico and binding to recombinant MEK by microscale thermophoresis in vitro. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first time to describe a cardenolide that induces parthanatos in leukemia cells, which may help to improve efforts to overcome drug resistance in cancer. A cardiac glycoside compound ZINC253504760 displayed cytotoxicity against different multidrug-resistant cell lines. ZINC253504760 exhibited cytotoxicity in CCRF-CEM leukemia cells by predominantly inducing a new mode of cell death (parthanatos). ZINC253504760 downregulated MEK1/2 phosphorylation and further affected ERK activation, which induced G2/M phase arrest.

BRAFV600 variant allele frequency predicts outcome in metastatic melanoma patients treated with BRAF and MEK inhibitors.

BACKGROUND: The prognostic impact of variant allele frequency (VAF) on clinical outcome in BRAFV600 mutated metastatic melanoma patients (MMPs) receiving BRAF (BRAFi) and MEK inhibitors (MEKi) is unclear. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A cohort of MMPs receiving first line BRAFi and MEKi was identified by inspecting dedicated databases of three Italian Melanoma Intergroup centres. VAF was determined by next generation sequencing in pre-treatment baseline tissue samples. Correlation between VAF and BRAF copy number variation was analysed in an ancillary study by using a training and a validation cohort of melanoma tissue samples and cell lines. RESULTS: Overall, 107 MMPs were included in the study. The VAF cut-off determined by ROC curve was 41.3%. At multivariate analysis, progression-free survival (PFS) was significantly shorter in patients with M1c/M1d [HR 2.25 (95% CI 1.41-3.6, p < 0.01)], in those with VAF >41.3% [HR 1.62 (95% CI 1.04-2.54, p < 0.05)] and in those with ECOG PS ≥1 [HR 1.82 (95% CI 1.15-2.88, p < 0.05)]. Overall survival (OS) was significantly shorter in patients with M1c/M1d [HR 2.01 (95% CI 1.25-3.25, p < 0.01)]. Furthermore, OS was shorter in patients with VAF >41.3% [HR 1.46 (95% CI 0.93-2.29, p = 0.06)] and in patients with ECOG PS ≥1 [HR 1.52 (95% CI 0.94-2.87, p = 0.14)]. BRAF gene amplification was found in 11% and 7% of samples in the training and validation cohort, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: High VAF is an independent poor prognostic factor in MMP receiving BRAFi and MEKi. High VAF and BRAF amplification coexist in 7%-11% of patients.

[Fertility, teratogenicity, and contraception during therapy with BRAF/MEK inhibitors]. / Fertilität, Teratogenität und Kontrazeption bei BRAF-/MEK-Inhibition.

BACKGROUND: Targeted mutation-based therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors has become an integral part of systemic therapy for metastatic melanoma in the advanced setting and for the adjuvant therapy of melanoma in stage III after complete resection. Due to the increased chances of survival and early use in the adjuvant situation, fertility preservation as well as aspects of teratogenicity and pregnancy are increasingly relevant in patients who are often still young. OBJECTIVES: To communicate the published and study-based information on fertility preservation, teratogenicity and pregnancy under therapy with BRAF and MEK inhibitors. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Summaries of product characteristics as well as studies and case reports on BRAF and MEK inhibitors published in PubMed were used as sources of information. RESULTS: There are no specific preclinical studies or experience in humans on fertility, teratogenicity, and contraception with targeted therapy. Recommendations can only be derived from toxicity studies and individual case reports. CONCLUSIONS: Patients should be offered counseling on the options for fertility-protective measures before starting targeted therapy. Due to unclear teratogenicity, adjuvant melanoma therapy with dabrafenib and trametinib should not be initiated in pregnant patients. In the advanced metastatic situation, BRAF and MEK inhibitors should only be given after extensive interdisciplinary education and counselling of the pregnant patient and her partner. Patients should be informed about the need for adequate contraception during targeted therapy.

Combination Therapy With MDM2 and MEK Inhibitors Is Effective in Patient-Derived Models of Lung Adenocarcinoma With Concurrent Oncogenic Drivers and MDM2 Amplification.

INTRODUCTION: Although targeted therapies have revolutionized the therapeutic landscape of lung adenocarcinomas (LUADs), disease progression on single-agent targeted therapy against known oncogenic drivers is common, and therapeutic options after disease progression are limited. In patients with MDM2 amplification (MDM2amp) and a concurrent oncogenic driver alteration, we hypothesized that targeting of the tumor-suppressor pathway (by means of restoration of p53 using MDM2 inhibition) and simultaneous targeting of co-occurring MAPK oncogenic pathway might represent a more durably effective therapeutic strategy. METHODS: We evaluated genomic next-generation sequencing data using the Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center-Integrated Mutation Profiling of Actionable Cancer Targets platform to nominate potential targets for combination therapy in LUAD. We investigated the small molecule MDM2 inhibitor milademetan in cell lines and patient-derived xenografts of LUAD with a known driver alteration and MDM2amp. RESULTS: Of 10,587 patient samples from 7121 patients with LUAD profiled by next-generation sequencing, 6% (410 of 7121) harbored MDM2amp. MDM2amp was significantly enriched among tumors with driver alterations in METex14 (36%, p < 0.001), EGFR (8%, p < 0.001), RET (12%, p < 0.01), and ALK (10%, p < 0.01). The combination of milademetan and the MEK inhibitor trametinib was synergistic in growth inhibition of ECLC5-GLx (TRIM33-RET/MDM2amp), LUAD12c (METex14/KRASG12S/MDM2amp), SW1573 (KRASG12C, TP53 wild type), and A549 (KRASG12S) cells and in increasing expression of proapoptotic proteins PUMA and BIM. Treatment of ECLC5-GLx and LUAD12c with single-agent milademetan increased ERK phosphorylation, consistent with previous data on ERK activation with MDM2 inhibition. This ERK activation was effectively suppressed by concomitant administration of trametinib. In contrast, ERK phosphorylation induced by milademetan was not suppressed by concurrent RET inhibition using selpercatinib (in ECLC5-GLx) or MET inhibition using capmatinib (in LUAD12c). In vivo, combination milademetan and trametinib was more effective than either agent alone in ECLC5-GLx, LX-285 (EGFRex19del/MDM2amp), L13BS1 (METex14/MDM2amp), and A549 (KRASG12S, TP53 wild type). CONCLUSIONS: Combined MDM2/MEK inhibition was found to have efficacy across multiple patient-derived LUAD models harboring MDM2amp and concurrent oncogenic drivers. This combination, potentially applicable to LUADs with a wide variety of oncogenic driver mutations and kinase fusions activating the MAPK pathway, has evident clinical implications and will be investigated as part of a planned phase 1/2 clinical trial.