Preventative Effect of Topical Rebamipide Against Corneal Epithelium Disorders Caused by Diclofenac Sodium.

Purpose: This study aimed to investigate the relationship between diclofenac sodium ophthalmic solution (DFNa) and corneal epithelial cell damage and to evaluate the preventive effect of rebamipide (RBM) on it. Methods: DFNa, DFNa/preservative-free (PF), or 0.5% chlorobutanol (CB) solution was instilled into the conjunctival sac of a normal rabbit eye, and corneal resistance measurement (using a corneal resistance device [CRD]) was performed 120 min after the end of instillation. Then, fluorescent staining (FL), corneal tissue staining (hematoxylin and eosin [H&E]), and immunostaining (zona occlusion-1) were performed (RBM-untreated group). However, RBM was instilled into the eyes of another group of normal rabbits, followed by each of the solutions; 120 min after the end of instillation, all evaluations were performed for this group (RBM treatment group). Results: Using the CRD method, in the RBM-untreated group, corneal resistance (CR; %) was found to be significantly reduced in DFNa (79.9 ± 19.4%), DFNa/PF (89.1 ± 17.3%), and 0.5% CB (83.8 ± 10.6%). In addition, DFNa and 0.5% CB solutions showed positive staining in the FL staining method. In the H&E staining method, some clear voids were observed in the outermost layer of the cornea using DFNa and 0.5% CB solutions. However, corneal epithelial damage was suppressed in the RBM treatment group. ZO-1 immunostaining in DFNa and 0.5% CB solutions revealed discontinuous localization of ZO-1 at the cell periphery. Conclusions: RBM eye drops were effective in preventing corneal epithelial damage caused by DFNa eye drops, and CB was considered to be the main causative agent of this damage.

Continuous co-prescription of rebamipide prevents upper gastrointestinal bleeding in NSAID use for orthopaedic conditions: A nested case-control study using the LIFE Study database.

BACKGROUND: Rebamipide has been widely co-prescribed with non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs (NSAIDs) in Japan for decades. This study aimed to evaluate the effectiveness of rebamipide in preventing upper gastrointestinal bleeding in new users of NSAIDs without risk factors of NSAID-induced ulcers other than age. METHODS: A nested case-control study was conducted using medical claims data of 1.66 million inhabitants of 17 municipalities participating in Japan's Longevity Improvement & Fair Evidence study. The cohort entry (t0) corresponded to a new user of NSAIDs for osteoarthritis or low back pain. Patients with risk factors of NSAID-induced ulcers other than age were excluded. Cases were defined as patients who underwent gastroscopy for upper gastrointestinal bleeding (occurrence date was defined as index date). A maximum of 10 controls were selected from non-cases at the index date of each case by matching sex, age, follow-up time, and type and dosage of NSAIDs. Exposure to rebamipide was defined as prescription status from t0 to index date: Non-user (rebamipide was not co-prescribed during the follow-up period), Continuous-user (rebamipide was co-prescribed from t0 with the same number of tablets as NSAIDs), and Irregular-user (neither Non-user nor Continuous-user). Conditional logistic regression analysis was conducted to estimate each category's odds ratio compared to non-users. FINDINGS: Of 67,561 individuals who met the inclusion criteria, 215 cases and 1,516 controls were selected. Compared with that of Non-users, the odds ratios and 95% confidence interval were 0.65 (0.44-0.96) for Continuous-users and 2.57 (1.73-3.81) for Irregular-users. CONCLUSIONS: Continuous co-prescription of rebamipide significantly reduced the risk of upper gastrointestinal bleeding in an Asian cohort of new users of NSAIDs with osteoarthritis or low back pain without risk factors other than age.

Oral quinolones versus intravenous ß-lactam for the treatment of acute focal bacterial nephritis: a retrospective cohort study.

BACKGROUND: Evidence regarding the best antibiotic regimen and the route of administration to treat acute focal bacterial nephritis (AFBN) is scarce. The aim of the present study was to compare the effectiveness of intravenous (IV) ß-lactam antibiotics versus oral quinolones. METHODS: This is a retrospective single centre study of patients diagnosed with AFBN between January 2017 and December 2018 in Hospital Universitari Vall d'Hebron, Barcelona (Spain). Patients were identified from the diagnostic codifications database. Patients treated with oral quinolones were compared with those treated with IV ß-lactam antibiotics. Therapeutic failure was defined as death, relapse, or evolution to abscess within the first 30 days. RESULTS: A total of 264 patients fulfilled the inclusion criteria. Of those, 103 patients (39%) received oral ciprofloxacin, and 70 (26.5%) IV ß-lactam. The most common isolated microorganism was Escherichia coli (149, 73.8%) followed by Klebsiella pneumoniae (26, 12.9%). Mean duration of treatment was 21.3 days (SD 7.9). There were no statistical differences regarding therapeutic failure between oral quinolones and IV ß-lactam treatment (6.6% vs. 8.7%, p = 0.6). Out of the 66 patients treated with intravenous antibiotics, 4 (6.1%) experienced an episode of phlebitis and 1 patient (1.5%) an episode of catheter-related bacteraemia. CONCLUSIONS: When susceptible, treatment of AFBN with oral quinolones is as effective as IV ß-lactam treatment with fewer adverse events.

A multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-controlled, phase 3 clinical trial assessing the efficacy and safety of intravenous nemonoxacin malate vs. levofloxacin for community-acquired pneumonia in adult patients.

BACKGROUND: Nemonoxacin malate is a novel non-fluorinated quinolone for oral and intravenous (IV) administration. This phase 3, multicentre, randomised, double-blind, double-dummy, parallel-controlled clinical trial (NCT02205112) evaluated the efficacy and safety of IV nemonoxacin vs. levofloxacin for the treatment of community-acquired pneumonia (CAP) in adult patients. METHODS: Eligible patients were randomised to receive 500 mg nemonoxacin or levofloxacin via IV infusion, once daily for 7-14 days. The primary endpoint was the clinical cure rate at the test-of-cure (TOC) visit in the modified intent-to-treat (mITT) population. Secondary efficacy and safety were also compared between nemonoxacin and levofloxacin. RESULTS: Overall, 525 patients were randomised and treated with nemonoxacin (n = 349) or levofloxacin (n = 176). The clinical cure rate was 91.8% (279/304) for nemonoxacin and 85.7% (138/161) for levofloxacin in the mITT population (P > 0.05). The clinical efficacy of nemonoxacin was non-inferior to levofloxacin for treatment of CAP. Microbiological success rate with nemonoxacin was 88.8% (95/107) and with levofloxacin was 87.8% (43/49) (P > 0.05) at the TOC visit in the bacteriological mITT population. The incidence of drug-related adverse events (AEs) was 37.1% in the nemonoxacin group and 22.2% in the levofloxacin group. These AEs were mostly local reactions at the infusion site, nausea, elevated alanine aminotransferase/aspartate aminotransferase (ALT/AST), and QT interval prolongation. The nemonoxacin-related AEs were mostly mild and resolved after discontinuation of nemonoxacin. CONCLUSIONS: Nemonoxacin 500 mg IV once daily for 7-14 days is effective and safe and non-inferior to levofloxacin for treating CAP in adult patients.

Pharmacokinetic variability of CFTR modulators from standard and alternative regimens.

Elexacaftor, tezacaftor, ivacaftor (ETI) is a CFTR modulator combination approved for use in ∼90 % of people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF) over 2 years old. While most pwCF tolerate this therapy well, some are intolerant to standard dosing, and others show little response. Clinical providers may adjust ETI dosing to combat these issues, but these adjustments are not well guided by pharmacokinetic evidence. Our post-approval study aimed to describe pharmacokinetic variability of ETI plasma concentrations in 15 participants who were administered a standard or reduced dose. ETI were quantified by LC-MS/MS in plasma samples taken prior to the morning dose. Results showed non-significant differences for each compound regardless of dosing regimen and after dose equivalence normalization. The majority of participants in both dosing groups had concentrations expected to elicit clinical response to ETI therapy. These findings indicate that dose reduction may be a viable strategy to maintain clinical benefit while managing intolerance.

Real-world characteristics of patients with asthma initiating fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol single-inhaler triple therapy in Japan.

BACKGROUND: Real-world data assessing characteristics of patients with asthma initiating inhaled corticosteroid/long-acting muscarinic antagonist/long-acting ß2-agonist (ICS/LAMA/LABA) triple therapy in Japan are limited. METHODS: Descriptive, observational study of patients with asthma aged ≥15 years newly initiating single- or multiple-inhaler triple therapy (SITT: fluticasone furoate/umeclidinium/vilanterol [FF/UMEC/VI], SITT: indacaterol/glycopyrronium bromide/mometasone furoate [IND/GLY/MF] or MITT) or ICS/LABA using JMDC/Medical Data Vision (MDV) health insurance databases from February 2021-February 2022 (first prescription date: index date). Patients were assigned to three non-mutually exclusive cohorts: A) new FF/UMEC/VI initiators; B) new FF/UMEC/VI, IND/GLY/MF, or MITT initiators; C) new FF/UMEC/VI, IND/GLY/MF, MITT or ICS/LABA initiators as initial maintenance therapy (IMT). Patient characteristics were assessed descriptively for 12-months pre-treatment initiation (baseline period). RESULTS: Cohort A: among new FF/UMEC/VI initiators, 12.8% and 0.1% (JMDC) and 21.7% and 0.9% (MDV) of patients had ≥1 moderate and severe exacerbation; 52.0% (JMDC) and 79.2% (MDV) had ICS/LABA use. Cohort B: most patients initiated FF/UMEC/VI and IND/GLY/MF over MITT (JMDC: 91.3% vs 8.7%; MDV: 67.8% vs 32.2%), with fewer exacerbations and lower rescue medication use. Cohort C: a greater proportion of FF/UMEC/VI initiators as IMT experienced a moderate exacerbation at index versus ICS/LABA initiators as IMT (JMDC: 17.8% vs 10.7%; MDV: 8.0% vs 5.1%). CONCLUSIONS: Patient characteristics were generally similar between treatment groups; SITT initiators had fewer exacerbations and lower rescue medication use than MITT initiators, represented by the greater proportion of IMT among SITT versus MITT initiators. Physicians may have prescribed triple over dual therapy as IMT in response to an exacerbation.

Impact of interruption of CFTR modulator therapies.

Novel drug therapy targeting the defective cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator protein has the potential to significantly enhance the quality of life for numerous patients with cystic fibrosis. However, in some countries social insurance does not pay for modulators because these drugs are extremely expensive. This study sought to understand the impact on the health of children whose modulator treatments were interrupted because of legal procedures and delivery processes. Our study identified that the significant increase in percent-predicted forced expiratory volume levels (FEV1) and BMI z-score values associated with modulator therapies decreased sharply with their discontinuation. Significant worsening in FEV1, BMI z-scores, and BW z-scores were detected in the first follow-up visit after therapy discontinuation within 1 month. Eight patients had a reduction of FEV1 of more than 10%. The findings suggest that modulatory treatment continuation is important, and it is crucial that treatment is not interrupted.

Enhancing Corneal Drug Penetration Using Penetratin for Ophthalmic Suspensions.

Eye drops, including solutions and suspensions, are essential dosage forms to treat ophthalmic diseases, with poorly water-soluble drugs typically formulated as ophthalmic suspensions. In addition to low bioavailability, suspensions exhibit limited efficacy, safety, and usability due to the presence of drug particles. Improving bioavailability can reduce the drug concentrations and the risk of problems associated with suspended drug particles. However, practical penetration enhancers capable of improving bioavailability remain elusive. Herein, we focused on penetratin (PNT), a cell-penetrating peptide (CPP) that promotes active cellular transport related to macromolecule uptake, such as micropinocytosis. According to the in vitro corneal uptake study using a reconstructed human corneal epithelial tissue model, LabCyte CORNEA-MODEL24, PNT enhanced the uptake of Fluoresbrite® YG carboxylate polystyrene microspheres without covalent binding. In an ex vivo porcine eye model, the addition of 10 µM PNT to rebamipide ophthalmic suspension markedly improved the corneal uptake of rebamipide; however, the addition of 100 µM PNT was ineffective due to potentially increased particle size by aggregation. This article provides basic information on the application of PNT as a penetration enhancer in ophthalmic suspensions, including the in vitro and ex vivo studies mentioned above, as well as the 3-(4,5-dimethylthiazol-2-yl)-2,5-diphenyltetrazolium bromide (MTT) cytotoxicity assay and storage stability at different pH values.

Together or Apart? Revealing the Impact of Dietary Interventions on Bioavailability of Quinolones: A Systematic Review with Meta-analyses.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVE: Managing drug-food interactions is essential for optimizing the effectiveness and safety profile of quinolones. Following PRISMA guidelines, we systematically reviewed the influence of dietary interventions on the bioavailability of 22 quinolones. METHODS: All studies describing or investigating the impact of food, beverages, antacids, and mineral supplements on pharmacokinetic parameters or pharmacokinetic/pharmacodynamic indices of orally taken quinolones were considered for inclusion. We excluded reviews, in vitro and in silico studies, studies performed on animals, and those involving alcohol. We performed the search in Medline (via PubMed), Embase, and Cochrane Library, covering reports from database inception to December 2022. We used the following tools to assess the risk of bias: version 2 of the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for parallel trials, the Cochrane risk-of-bias tool for cross-over studies, and the NIH quality assessment tool for before-after studies. We performed quantitative analyses for each quinolone if two or more food-effect studies with specified and comparable study designs were available. If meta-analyses were not applicable, we qualitatively summarized the results. RESULTS: We included 109 studies from 101 reports. Meta-analyses were conducted for 12 antibiotics and qualitative synthesis was employed for the remaining drugs. Of the studies, 60.5% were open-label, cross-over, as recommended by FDA. We judged 46% of studies as having a high risk of bias and only 4% of having a low risk of bias. Among 19 quinolones with available food impact data, 14 (74%) had potentially clinically important interactions. For nalidixic acid, oxolinic acid, and tosufloxacin, food exerted a high positive impact on bioavailability (AUC or Cmax increased by > 45%), whereas, for all the remaining drugs, postprandial absorption was lower. The most significant negative influence of food (AUC or Cmax decreased by > 40%) occurred for delafloxacin capsules and norfloxacin, whereas the moderate influence (AUC or Cmax decreased by 30-40%) occurred for nemonoxacin and rufloxacin. All 14 analysed quinolones showed a substantial reduction in bioavailability when co-administered with antacids and mineral supplements, except for calcium preparations. The impact of beverages was evaluated for 10 quinolones, with 50% experiencing significantly reduced absorption in the presence of milk (the highest negative impact for ciprofloxacin). Moreover, both ciprofloxacin and levofloxacin demonstrated compromised bioavailability when consumed with orange juice, particularly calcium-fortified. DISCUSSION: Several factors may influence interactions, including the physicochemical characteristics of quinolones, the type of intervention, drug formulation, and the patient's health status. We assessed the quality of evidence as low due to the poor actuality of included studies, their methodological diversity, and uneven data availability for individual drugs.

Tipifarnib physiologically-based pharmacokinetic modeling to assess drug-drug interaction, organ impairment, and biopharmaceutics in healthy subjects and cancer patients.

A physiologically-based pharmacokinetic (PBPK) model for tipifarnib, which included mechanistic absorption, was built and verified by integrating in vitro data and several clinical data in healthy subjects and cancer patients. The final PBPK model was able to recover the clinically observed single and multiple-dose plasma concentrations of tipifarnib in healthy subjects and cancer patients under several dosing conditions, such as co-administration with a strong CYP3A4 inhibitor and inducer, an acid-reducing agent (proton pump inhibitor and H2 receptor antagonist), and with a high-fat meal. In addition, the model was able to accurately predict the effect of mild or moderate hepatic impairment on tipifarnib exposure. The appropriately verified model was applied to prospectively simulate the liability of tipifarnib as a victim of CYP3A4 enzyme-based drug-drug interactions (DDIs) with a moderate inhibitor and inducer as well as tipifarnib as a perpetrator of DDIs with sensitive substrates of CYP3A4, CYP2B6, CYP2D6, CYP2C9, and CYP2C19 in healthy subjects and cancer patients. The effect of a high-fat meal, acid-reducing agent, and formulation change at the therapeutic dose was simulated. Finally, the model was used to predict the effect of mild, moderate, or severe hepatic, and renal impairment on tipifarnib PK. This multipronged approach of combining the available clinical data with PBPK modeling-guided dosing recommendations for tipifarnib under several conditions. This example showcases the totality of the data approach to gain a more thorough understanding of clinical pharmacology and biopharmaceutic properties of oncology drugs in development.

Extent of foetal exposure to maternal elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor during pregnancy.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Cystic fibrosis (CF) patients are living longer and healthier due to improved treatments, e.g. cystic fibrosis transmembrane conductance regulator (CFTR) modulator therapy elexacaftor/tezacaftor/ivacaftor (ETI), with treatment possibly occurring in pregnancy. The risk of ETI to foetuses remain unknown. Thus the effect of maternally administered ETI on foetal genetic and structural development was investigated. EXPERIMENTAL APPROACH: Pregnant Sprague Dawley rats were orally treated with ETI (6.7 mg·kg-1·day-1 elexacaftor + 3.5 mg·kg-1·day-1 tezacaftor + 25 mg·kg-1·day-1 ivacaftor) for 7 days from E12 to E19. Tissue samples collected at E19 were analysed using histology and RNA sequencing. Histological changes and differentially expressed genes (DEG) were assessed. KEY RESULTS: No overt structural abnormalities were found in foetal pancreas, liver, lung and small intestine after 7-day ETI exposure. Very few non-functionally associated DEG in foetal liver, lung and small intestine were identified using RNA-seq. 29 DEG were identified in thymus (27 up-regulated and two down-regulated) and most were functionally linked to each other. Gene ontology enrichment analysis revealed that multiple muscle-related terms were significantly enriched. Many more DEG were identified in cortex (44 up-regulated and four down-regulated) and a group of these were involved in central nervous system and brain development. CONCLUSION AND IMPLICATION: Sub-chronic ETI treatment in late pregnancy does not appear to pose a significant risk to the genetic and structural development of many foetal tissues. However, significant gene changes in foetal thymic myoid cells and cortical neuronal development requires future follow-up studies to assess the risk to these organs.

Clinical Efficacy of 2% Rebamipide in Patients With Video Display Terminal-Associated Dry Eye Disease: A Prospective, Randomized, Double-Blinded Study.

PURPOSE: To compare the effects of 2% rebamipide clear solution and 0.1% sodium hyaluronate eye drops in patients with visual display terminal (VDT)-related dry eye disease (DED). DESIGN: Prospective, randomized, double-blinded Study. METHODS: This was a prospective, double-blind, and randomized controlled study. Patients with VDT-related DED were randomly allocated to a 2% rebamipide (REB) group or a 0.1% sodium hyaluronate (HYA) group (4 times/day for 4 weeks). The ocular surface disease index (OSDI), dry eye questionnaire-5 (DEQ-5), Placido disk-tear film analyzer, fluorescein-stained tear break-up time (FBUT), ocular surface staining score, and Schirmer 1 test were examined before and after the instillation of drug. RESULTS: A total of 56 eyes of 28 patients (28 eyes of 14 patients in each group) were included. There were no significant differences in the baseline data. The OSDI, DEQ-5, FBUT, and conjunctival erosion scores improved significantly in both groups after treatment. In the REB group, corneal staining and bulbar nasal redness scores also improved significantly after treatment ( P <0.001 and 0.036, respectively), whereas no significant differences were found in these parameters in the HYA group ( P =0.326 and 0.118, respectively). The REB group showed a significantly larger decrease in the corneal staining score than the HYA group ( P =0.016). No adverse reactions were observed. CONCLUSIONS: A 2% rebamipide clear solution effectively improved the symptoms and signs in patients with VDT-related DED and was superior to 0.1% sodium hyaluronate ophthalmic solution in improving corneal epithelial damage, making it a safe and effective treatment option for VDT-related DED.

A Phase 1 Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Pharmacokinetics of a Tenofovir Alafenamide/Elvitegravir Insert Administered Rectally for HIV Prevention.

BACKGROUND: On-demand topical products could be an important tool for human immunodeficiency virus (HIV) prevention. We evaluated the safety, pharmacokinetics, and ex vivo pharmacodynamics of a tenofovir alafenamide/elvitegravir (TAF/EVG, 20 mg/16 mg) insert administered rectally. METHODS: MTN-039 was a phase 1, open-label, single-arm, 2-dose study. Blood, rectal fluid, and rectal tissue were collected over 72 hours following rectal administration of 1 and 2 TAF/EVG inserts for each participant. RESULTS: TAF/EVG inserts were safe and well tolerated. EVG and tenofovir (TFV) were detected in blood plasma at low concentrations: median peak concentrations after 2 inserts were EVG 2.4 ng/mL and TFV 4.4 ng/mL. Rectal tissue EVG peaked at 2 hours (median, 2 inserts = 9 ng/mg) but declined to below limit of quantification in the majority of samples at 24 hours, whereas tenofovir diphosphate (TFV-DP) remained high >2000 fmol/million cells for 72 hours with 2 inserts. Compared to baseline, median cumulative log10 HIV p24 antigen of ex vivo rectal tissue HIV infection was reduced at each time point for both 1 and 2 inserts (P < .065 and P < .039, respectively). DISCUSSION: Rectal administration of TAF/EVG inserts achieved high rectal tissue concentrations of EVG and TFV-DP with low systemic drug exposure and demonstrable ex vivo inhibition of HIV infection for 72 hours. Clinical Trials Registration . NCT04047420.

Safety and efficacy of ivacaftor in infants aged 1 to less than 4 months with cystic fibrosis.

BACKGROUND: Ivacaftor (IVA) has been shown to be safe and efficacious in children aged ≥4 months with cystic fibrosis (CF) and CFTR gating variants. We evaluated safety, pharmacokinetics (PK), and efficacy of IVA in a small cohort of infants aged 1 to <4 months with CF. METHODS: In this phase 3, open-label study, infants 1 to <4 months with CF and an IVA-responsive CFTR variant received an initial low dose of IVA based on age and weight. Because IVA is a sensitive CYP3A substrate and CYP3A maturation is uncertain in infants, doses were adjusted at day 15 to better match median adult exposures based on individual PK measurements taken on day 4. Primary endpoints were safety and PK measurements. RESULTS: Seven infants (residual function CFTR variants [n=5]; minimal function CFTR variants [n=2]) received ≥1 dose of IVA. Six infants had doses adjusted at day 15 and one infant did not require dose adjustment; subsequent PK analyses showed mean trough concentrations for IVA and metabolites were within range of prior clinical experience. Four infants (57.1%) had adverse events (AEs); no serious AEs were noted. One infant discontinued study drug due to a non-serious AE of elevated alanine aminotransferase >8x the upper limit of normal. Mean sweat chloride concentration decreased (-40.3 mmol/L [SD: 29.2]) through week 24. Improvements in biomarkers of pancreatic function and intestinal inflammation, as well as growth parameters, were observed. CONCLUSIONS: In this small, open-label study, IVA dosing in infants achieved exposures previously shown to be safe and efficacious. Because PK was predictable, a dosing regimen based on age and weight is proposed. IVA was generally safe and well tolerated, and led to improvements in CFTR function, markers of pancreatic function and intestinal inflammation, and growth parameters, supporting use in infants as young as 1 month of age.

Comparative Efficacy of Dopamine Partial Agonists by Doses for Treatment-Resistant Depression: A Systematic Review and Dose-Response Model-Based Network Meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: The augmentative antidepressant effects of dopamine partial agonists (aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine) for treatment-resistant depression have been compared in a previous network meta-analysis. However, the comparative efficacy of the dose-responses of these drugs remains unclear. Therefore, we aimed to estimate the dose-response relationships and compare the effects of each dopamine partial agonist doses. METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of the Cochrane Library, PubMed, CINHAL, and ClinicalTrials.gov databases until January 1, 2023. Double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials evaluating aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine for treatment-resistant depression were included. A random-effect dose-response model-based network meta-analysis was conducted. This study was registered in PROSPERO (CRD42023393035). RESULTS: The maximum effective doses were 5.5 mg for aripiprazole, 1.6 mg for brexpiprazole, and 1.5 mg for cariprazine, respectively. Although all doses of the 3 drugs were significantly more effective than placebo, aripiprazole ranging from 5.5 to 12.5 mg was significantly more effective than brexpiprazole 0.5 mg and cariprazine ranging from 0.5 to 1 mg. Moreover, aripiprazole ranging from 7.5 to 12.5 mg was significantly more effective than all doses of cariprazine. In addition, brexpiprazole ranging from 1 to 3 mg was significantly more effective than cariprazine 0.5 mg and brexpiprazole ranging from 1.6 to 2.5 mg was significantly superior to cariprazine 1 mg. There were no doses at which brexpiprazole overcame aripiprazole, and cariprazine overcame aripiprazole or brexpiprazole. CONCLUSIONS: Aripiprazole, brexpiprazole, and cariprazine may be effective in treatment-resistant depression in that order, with the maximum effective doses at 5.5 mg, 1.6 mg, and 1.5 mg, respectively.

QbD Based Formulation Development and Optimisation of Ozenoxacin Topical Nano-Emulgel and Efficacy Evaluation Using Impetigo Mice Model.

To formulate and optimize Ozenoxacin nano-emulsion using Quality by Design (QbD) concept by means of Box-Behnken Design (BBD) and converting it to a gel to form Ozenoxacin nano-emulgel followed by physico-chemical, in-vitro, ex-vivo and in-vivo evaluation. This study demonstrates the application of QbD methodology for the development and optimization of an effective topical nanoemulgel formulation for the treatment of Impetigo focusing on the selection of appropriate excipients, optimization of formulation and process variables, and characterization of critical quality attributes. BBD was used to study the effect of "% of oil, % of Smix and homogenization speed" on critical quality attributes "globule size and % entrapment efficiency" for the optimisation of Ozenoxacin Nano-emulsion. Ozenoxacin loaded nano-emulgel was characterized for "description, identification, pH, specific gravity, amplitude sweep, viscosity, assay, organic impurities, antimicrobial effectiveness testing, in-vitro release testing, ex-vivo permeation testing, skin retention and in-vivo anti-bacterial activity". In-vitro release and ex-vivo permeation, skin retention and in-vivo anti-bacterial activity were found to be significantly (p < 0.01) higher for the nano-emulgel formulation compared to the innovator formulation (OZANEX™). Antimicrobial effectiveness testing was performed and found that even at 70% label claim of benzoic acid is effective to inhibit microbial growth in the drug product. The systematic application of QbD principles facilitated the successful development and optimization of a Ozenoxacin Nano-Emulsion. Optimised Ozenoxacin Nano-Emulgel can be considered as an effective alternative and found to be stable at least for 6 months at 40 °C / 75% RH and 30 °C / 75% RH.

Pediatric Extrapolation Approach for U.S. Food and Drug Administration Approval of Brexpiprazole in Patients Aged 13 to 17 Years with Schizophrenia.

A pharmacokinetic (PK) bridging approach was successfully employed to support the dosing regimen and approval of brexpiprazole in pediatric patients aged 13-17 years with schizophrenia. Brexpiprazole was approved in 2015 for the treatment of schizophrenia and the adjunctive treatment of major depressive disorder in adults based on efficacy and safety data from clinical trials. On January 13, 2020, the US Food and Drug Administration issued a general advice letter to sponsors highlighting the acceptance of efficacy extrapolation of certain atypical antipsychotics from adult patients to pediatric patients considering the similarity in disease and exposure-response relationships. Brexpiprazole is the first atypical antipsychotic approved in pediatrics using this approach. The PK data available from pediatric patients aged 13-17 years have shown high variability due to the limited number of PK evaluable subjects, which limits a robust estimation of differences between adult and pediatric patients. The PK model-based approach was thus utilized to evaluate the appropriateness of the dosing regimen by comparing PK exposures in pediatric patients aged 13-17 years with exposures achieved in adults at the approved doses. In addition to exposure matching, safety data from a long-term open-label clinical study in pediatric patients informed the safety profile in pediatric patients. This report illustrates the potential of leveraging previously collected efficacy, safety, and PK data in adult patients to make a regulatory decision in pediatric patients for the indication of schizophrenia.

Adjunctive Brexpiprazole for Patient Life Engagement in Major Depressive Disorder: A Canadian, Phase 4, Open-Label, Interventional Study: Brexpiprazole d'appoint pour l'engagement dans la vie des patients souffrant de trouble dépressif majeur: une étude interventionnelle canadienne ouverte de phase 4.

OBJECTIVES: To characterize the effects of adjunctive brexpiprazole on patient life engagement and depressive symptoms in patients with major depressive disorder (MDD) using patient-reported outcomes. METHODS: An 8-week, Phase 4, open-label, interventional study was conducted at 15 Canadian trial sites between April 2021 and May 2022. Adult outpatients with MDD (at least moderately severe) and inadequate response to 1-2 antidepressants continued their current antidepressant and received oral adjunctive brexpiprazole 0.5-2 mg/day. Co-primary endpoints were change from baseline to Week 8 in Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology Self-Report (IDS-SR) 10-item Life Engagement subscale score, and IDS-SR 30-item total score. Safety was assessed by standard variables. RESULTS: Of 122 enrolled patients, 120 (98.4%) were treated (mean [SD] dose: 1.2 [0.4] mg/day) and analyzed, and 111 (91.0%) completed the study. Statistically significant least squares mean improvements to Week 8 were observed on IDS-SR10 Life Engagement subscale score (baseline mean [SD]: 16.1 [4.7]; change [95% confidence interval]: -8.11 [-9.34, -6.88]; p < 0.001) and IDS-SR total score (baseline mean [SD]: 41.3 [9.8]; change [95% confidence interval]: -17.38 [-20.08, -14.68]; p < 0.001). Improvements were observed from Week 2, onwards. Treatment-emergent adverse events with incidence ≥5% were fatigue (n = 13, 10.8%), headache (n = 13, 10.8%), insomnia (n = 12, 10.0%), nausea (n = 9, 7.5%), tremor (n = 8, 6.7%), and weight increase (n = 7, 5.8%). Six patients (5.0%) discontinued due to adverse events. Mean (SD) change in body weight from baseline to last visit was +1.9 (3.4) kg. CONCLUSIONS: Using an exploratory patient-reported outcome measure, patients with MDD and inadequate response to antidepressants who received open-label adjunctive brexpiprazole showed early and clinically meaningful improvement in patient life engagement, which should be further assessed in a prospective randomized controlled trial. Patient-rated depressive symptoms (on the validated 30-item IDS-SR) also improved. Adjunctive brexpiprazole was well tolerated, and no new safety signals were observed. CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT04830215.

Correlation between trough concentration and AUC for elexacaftor, tezacaftor and ivacaftor.

Therapeutic drug monitoring (TDM) of elexacaftor, tezacaftor, ivacaftor (ETI) could be a useful tool to increase efficacy and decrease the risk of adverse effects in people with Cystic Fibrosis (pwCF). It is however unclear whether drug exposure should be monitored by assessment of trough (Cmin) levels or determination of the area under the curve (AUC). Hence, in this study the correlation between measured Cmin concentration and AUC was evaluated. Serial plasma samples, including Cmin, were drawn after administration of ETI in order to calculate the AUC and assess the correlation between the two parameters. A linear correlation between Cmin and AUC0-24h was found, with Pearson's r correlation coefficients of 0.963, 0.908 and 0.860 for elexacaftor, tezacaftor and ivacaftor, respectively. Exposure of ETI may be monitored by assessment of Cmin levels.