RESUMEN
PURPOSE: Several studies report occupational orthopedic problems among interventional cardiologists. These health problems are usually multifactorial. However, the personal protective equipment used should play a major role. An online survey was conducted to determine the frequency of such health problems among interventional radiologists and to correlate them with the use of personal radiation protective clothing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An anonymous online survey that comprised of 17 questions was sent via e-mail to 1427 members of the German Society for Interventional Radiology (DeGIR) in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The questions were focused on interventional workload, the use of personal radiation protection apparel and orthopedic problems. Given the different scale levels, the associations between the variables were analyzed using different statistical methods. A significance level of pâ¯<â¯0.05 was chosen. RESULTS: There were 221 survey responders (15.5% response rate). About half of responders (47.7%) suffered from more than five episodes of orthopedic problems during their interventional career. Lumbar spine was involved in 81.7% of these cases, cervical spine in 32.8%, shoulder in 28.5% and knee in 24.7%. Because of orthopedic problems, 16.1% of the responders had to reduce and 2.7% had to stop their interventional practice. The number of affected body regions correlates with the fit of the radiation protection means (pâ¯<â¯0.05, râ¯=â¯0.135) and the reduction of activity as an interventional radiologist (pâ¯<â¯0.05, râ¯=â¯-0.148). CONCLUSION: Overall, the survey reveals widespread orthopedic problems at several body regions among interventional radiologists, associated with the fit of radiation protection systems, among other factors. A connection between the orthopaedic complaints and the radiation protection system used could not be established.
Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Profesionales , Protección Radiológica , Radiología Intervencionista , Humanos , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Radiología Intervencionista/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Alemania/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Ropa de Protección/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Austria/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: To present the median value and 75th percentile of air kerma at the reference point (Ka,r), air kerma-area product (KAP), and fluoroscopic time for a large number of fluoroscopically guided interventional (FGI) procedures. METHODS: This retrospective study included the consecutive non-coronary FGI procedures from a Radiology department between May 2016 and October 2018 at a large tertiary-care hospital in the U.S. An in-house developed, semi-automated software, integrated with a dictation system, was used to record patient examination information, including Ka,r, KAP and fluoroscopic time. The included patient procedures were categorized into procedure types. A software package R (v. 3.5.1, R Foundation) was used to calculate procedure-specific quartiles of radiation exposure. RESULTS: Based on analysis of 24,911 FGI cases, median value and 75th percentile are presented for each of Ka,r, KAP and fluoroscopic time for 101 procedures that can act as benchmark for comparison for dose optimization studies. CONCLUSION: This study provides reference levels ( 50th and 75th percentiles) for a comprehensive list of FGI procedures, reflecting an overall picture of the latest FGI studies for diagnosis, targeted minimally invasive intervention, and therapeutic treatment. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This study provides reference levels (50th and 75th percentiles) for the largest number of fluoroscopically guided interventional procedures reported to date (101 procedures), in terms of air kerma at the reference point, air kerma-area product, and fluoroscopic time, among which these quartiles for ≥50 procedures are presented for the first time.
Asunto(s)
Fluoroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición a la Radiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Aire , Benchmarking , Humanos , Dosis de Radiación , Monitoreo de Radiación , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Valores de Referencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , Factores de TiempoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: Constantly increasing number of procedures performed - endovascular or hybrid in patients with aortoiliac occlusive disease during the last decades finds its explanation in the lower morbidity and mortality rates, compared to bypass surgery. The purpose of the current survey was to estimate patients' radiation exposure in aortoiliac segment after endovascular or hybrid revascularization and to study the main factors which have direct contribution. METHODS: A retrospective study of 285 procedures conducted with the help of a mobile C-arm system in 223 patients was performed. Procedures were grouped according to criteria such as: type of intervention, vascular access, level of complexity and operating team. Different analyses were performed within the groups and dose values. RESULTS: The median values of kerma-air product (KAP), the number of series and the peak skin dose (PSD) significantly increase with the increasing number of vascular accesses: for one access (16.68 Gy.cm2, 6 and 336 mGy), for two (56.93 Gy.cm2, 11 and 545 mGy), and for three (102.28 Gy.cm2, 15 and 781 mGy). Significant dependence was observed in the case of single access site between the type of access and the dose values: hybrid and retrograde common femoral artery/superficial femoral artery (CFA/SFA) endovascular accesses, 10.06 Gy.cm2/301 mGy and 13.23 Gy.cm2/318 mGy respectively, in contrast with the contralateral CFA and left brachial access, 33 Gy.cm2/421 mGy and 38.33 Gy.cm2/448 mGy respectively. CONCLUSION: The results demonstrate that the most important factors increasing the dose values are number and type of vascular accesses, followed by the combination and number of implanted stents with the complexity of the procedure. The PSD values for a single procedure were between 2 and 12 times lower than those IAEA proposed as trigger levels for radiation-induced erythema. This study shows that trigger levels were not reached even for patients with repeated procedures in the same segment in 1-year period. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: The study gives important understanding and clarity on the growing awareness for dose-modifying factors during endovascular and hybrid revascularization of aortoiliac segment.
Asunto(s)
Arteriopatías Oclusivas/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteriopatías Oclusivas/cirugía , Procedimientos Endovasculares/métodos , Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Aorta/diagnóstico por imagen , Aorta/cirugía , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Arteria Ilíaca/diagnóstico por imagen , Arteria Ilíaca/cirugía , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios RetrospectivosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to assess self-reported breast cancer prevalence potentially associated with occupational radiation exposure from fluoroscopy-guided procedures in female physicians using current standard protection measures. METHODS: An institutional review board-approved survey was shared as a link to self-identified female physicians. We compared self-reported prevalence of breast cancer among women physicians with longer than 10 years of postfellowship practice in specialties with heavy fluoroscopy exposure versus specialties with low fluoroscopy exposure. We compared the distribution of breast cancer risk factors and personal radiation safety measures. RESULTS: A total of 303 women physicians participated in the survey. There were 8 (16%) of 49 from the first study group and 8 (18%) of 44 from the second study group who self-reported a diagnosis of breast cancer. There were no differences in the distribution of breast cancer risk factors between the 2 groups or prevalence of breast cancer (P = 0.81). CONCLUSIONS: Self-reported breast cancer prevalence is similar between women physicians who are practicing fluoroscopically heavy and light medical specialties.
Asunto(s)
Neoplasias de la Mama/epidemiología , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Médicos Mujeres/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición a la Radiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Fluoroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Humanos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Prevalencia , Radiografía Intervencional/métodosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: This analysis aimed to compare failure to rescue (FTR) after pancreatoduodenectomy across the Atlantic. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: FTR, or mortality after development of a major complication, is a quality metric originally created to compare hospital results. FTR has been studied in North American and Northern European patients undergoing pancreatoduodenectomy (PD). However, a direct comparison of FTR after PD between North America and Northern Europe has not been performed. METHODS: Patients who underwent PD in North America, the Netherlands, Sweden and Germany (GAPASURG dataset) were identified from their respective registries (2014-17). Patients who developed a major complication defined as Clavien-Dindo ≥3 or developed a grade B/C postoperative pancreatic fistula (POPF) were included. Preoperative, intraoperative, and postoperative variables were compared between patients with and without FTR. Variables significant on univariable analysis were entered into a logistic regression for FTR. RESULTS: Major complications occurred in 6188 of 22,983 patients (26.9%) after PD, and 504 (8.1%) patients had FTR. North American and Northern European patients with complications differed, and rates of FTR were lower in North America (5.4% vs 12%, P < 0.001). Fourteen factors from univariable analysis contributing to differences in patients who developed FTR were included in a logistic regression. On multivariable analysis, factors independently associated with FTR were age, American Society of Anesthesiology ≥3, Northern Europe, POPF, organ failure, life-threatening complication, nonradiologic intervention, and reoperation. CONCLUSIONS: Older patients with severe systemic diseases are more difficult to rescue. Failure to rescue is more common in Northern Europe than North America. In stable patients, management of complications by interventional radiology is preferred over reoperation.
Asunto(s)
Fracaso de Rescate en Atención a la Salud , Pancreaticoduodenectomía/mortalidad , Complicaciones Posoperatorias/mortalidad , Factores de Edad , Anciano , Femenino , Alemania/epidemiología , Humanos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Países Bajos/epidemiología , América del Norte/epidemiología , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros , Reoperación/estadística & datos numéricos , Factores de Riesgo , Suecia/epidemiologíaRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: The burgeoning usage and complexity of fluoroscopically guided procedures (FGPs) contribute to extended examination times and increased risk of adverse radiation effects. Diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) play a pivotal role in dose optimization. There are limited DRL data for FGPs in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs). PURPOSE: To determine local DRLs (LDRLs) for common FGPs in the South African (SA) context and compare these with published international data. MATERIAL AND METHODS: A three-year, retrospective study of the 15 most frequently performed FGPs at a SA institution. For each procedure, the 50th and 75th percentiles of kerma area product (KAP), reference point air kerma (Ka,r), and fluoroscopy time data were derived. Published international FGP DRL data were collated and compared with the 75th percentiles of local institutional dosage parameters. RESULTS: The commonest FGPs were aorto-bifemoral diagnostic angiography (n = 590), aorto-bifemoral interventional angiography (n = 287), nephrostomy (n = 265), and bronchial arterial embolization (BAE) (n = 208). Selective abdominal vessel interventional angiography (KAP = 170 Gy . cm2; Ka,r = 877 mGy) recorded the highest LDRL dosages; BAE was the longest procedure (LDRL = 38 min). Nephrostomies achieved the lowest LDRLs across all parameters (KAP = 10 Gy . cm2; Ka,r = 63 mGy, fluoroscopy time = 4.3 min). All Tygerberg Hospital LDRLs with comprehensive comparable data were within or below published ranges. CONCLUSION: This study advances international radiation protection initiatives, addresses the paucity of LMIC DRL data, demonstrates broad alignment of Tygerberg Hospital FGP practice with international norms and highlights areas for optimization of institutional practice.
Asunto(s)
Niveles de Referencia para Diagnóstico , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Sudáfrica , Centros de Atención TerciariaRESUMEN
PURPOSE: The aim of this national survey was to assess the overall impact of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic on the provision of interventional radiology (IR) services in Canada. METHODS: An anonymous electronic survey was distributed via national and regional radiology societies, exploring (1) center information and staffing, (2) acute and on-call IR services, (3) elective IR services, (4) IR clinics, (5) multidisciplinary rounds, (6) IR training, (7) personal protection equipment (PPE), and departmental logistics. RESULTS: Individual responses were received from 142 interventional radiologists across Canada (estimated 70% response rate). Nearly half of the participants (49.3%) reported an overall decrease in demand for acute IR services; on-call services were maintained at centers that routinely provide these services (99%). The majority of respondents (73.2%) were performing inpatient IR procedures at the bedside where possible. Most participants (88%) reported an overall decrease in elective IR services. Interventional radiology clinics and multidisciplinary rounds were predominately transitioned to virtual platforms. The vast majority of participants (93.7%) reported their center had disseminated an IR specific PPE policy; 73% reported a decrease in case volume for trainees by at least 25% and a proportion of trainees will either have a delay in starting their careers as IR attendings (24%) or fellowship training (35%). CONCLUSION: The COVID-19 pandemic has had a profound impact on IR services in Canada, particularly for elective cases. Many centers have utilized virtual platforms to provide multidisciplinary meetings, IR clinics, and training. Guidelines should be followed to ensure patient and staff safety while resuming IR services.
Asunto(s)
Centros Médicos Académicos/estadística & datos numéricos , COVID-19/prevención & control , Atención a la Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Comunitarios/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiología Intervencionista/estadística & datos numéricos , Centros Médicos Académicos/organización & administración , Atención Posterior/estadística & datos numéricos , Canadá , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos Electivos/estadística & datos numéricos , Becas/estadística & datos numéricos , Necesidades y Demandas de Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , Hospitales Comunitarios/organización & administración , Humanos , Política Organizacional , Grupo de Atención al Paciente , Equipo de Protección Personal , Radiología Intervencionista/educación , Radiología Intervencionista/organización & administración , SARS-CoV-2 , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Rondas de Enseñanza/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
OBJECTIVES: In fluoroscopy-guided interventional practices, new dose reduction systems have proved to be efficient in the reduction of patient doses. However, it is not clear whether this reduction in patient dose is proportionally transferred to operators' doses. This work investigates the secondary radiation fields produced by two kinds of interventional cardiology units from the same manufacturer with and without dose reduction systems.Methods:Data collected from a large sample of clinical procedures over a 2-year period (more than 5000 procedures and 340,000 radiation events) and the DICOM radiation dose structured reports were analysed. RESULTS: The average cumulative Hp(10) per procedure measured at the C-arm was similar for the standard and the dose reduction systems (452 vs 476 µSv respectively). The events analysis showed that the ratio Hp(10)/KAP at the C-arm was (mean ± SD) 5 ± 2, 10 ± 4, 14 ± 4 and 14 ± 6 µSv·Gy-1·cm-2 for the beams with no added filtration, 0.1, 0.4 and 0.9 mm Cu respectively and suggested that the main cause for the increment of the ratio Hp(10)/KAP vs the "standard system" is the use of higher beam filtration in the "dose reduction" system. CONCLUSION: Dose reduction systems are beneficial to reduce KAP in patients and their use should be encouraged, but they may not be equally effective to reduce occupational doses. Interventionalists should not overlook their own personal protection when using new technologies with dose reduction systems. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Dose reduction technology in interventional systems may increase scatter dose for operators. Personal protection should not be overlooked with dose reduction systems.
Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Dosis de Radiación , Monitoreo de Radiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Peripherally inserted central catheters, also known as PICC lines, are very common procedures for patients in the hospital who need to have long-term intravenous access, for various reasons such as antibiotics or total parenteral nutrition. At our institution, there is currently only one interventional radiology (IR) suite in our department to accommodate all IR procedures. Therefore, the bedside PICC program was introduced to help alleviate the workload in the IR suite and to improve overall patient care. Under the supervision of the hospital's interventional radiologists, trained x-ray technologists (medical radiation technologists [MRTs]) are inserting PICCs at the bedside. The purpose of this article is to describe the creation of a bedside PICC program by x-ray technologists in a hospital setting and to analyze the PICC insertions performed by MRTs over a six-year period. METHODS: In 2012, a bedside PICC insertion program was developed at our hospital, whereby two technologists would perform the procedure, using the Site-Rite® 8 Ultrasound System alongside the integrated Sherlock 3CG™ Diamond Tip Confirmation System. Training on these systems and procedural techniques, including venipuncture, sterile technique, and equipment knowledge and troubleshooting was provided for technologists. The point-of-care program was revamped in 2017 in that only one technologist would go to the bedside alone for PICC insertions. All data for the analyses were obtained from the Radiology Information System program used by our medical imaging department, called Coral RIS/PACS. RESULTS: Owing to staffing issues and inconsistent scheduling, an overview of yearly volumes of bedside PICCs performed increased from 45 in 2012 to 486 in 2018. After program changes made in 2017, these changes yielded a total volume of 382 of bedside PICCs performed, and an even more remarkable amount of 486 in 2018. For these two latter years, an evaluation of the program was carried out by analyzing how many bedside PICCs were performed successfully by the solo technologist. Overall success was achieved for both years: in 2017, 82% of the cases were performed by the technologist alone without any assistance, and likewise 89% in 2018. CONCLUSION: Since the onset of this process improvement initiative, the bedside PICC program by MRTs under the supervision of the interventional radiologists at our institution has benefited many patients and the hospital as a whole. It was apparent during the development of the program that consistent scheduling of trained and dedicated MRTs to do these bedside procedures on a regular basis improved the efficiency of the program.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto/organización & administración , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Canadá , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estadística & datos numéricos , Catéteres de Permanencia , Humanos , Sistemas de Atención de Punto/estadística & datos numéricos , Desarrollo de Programa , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Servicio de Radiología en Hospital/organización & administración , UltrasonografíaRESUMEN
AIM: To evaluate the response measures in continuing an image-guided intervention service in two tertiary-level musculoskeletal oncology centres during the COVID-19 pandemic. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This study was a retrospective review of all patients undergoing image-guided intervention in the computed tomography (CT) and normal ultrasound (US) rooms from 24 March 2020 to 24 May 2020 (during the COVID-19 pandemic peak) at Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, London, and Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, Birmingham, UK. Measures were put in place to address air pressures, airflow direction, aerosol generation, and the safe utilisation of existing scanning rooms and work lists for interventional procedures. RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-one patients (164 at Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital and 167 at Royal Orthopaedic Hospital) underwent image-guided procedures at both sites in the CT and US rooms. At the Royal National Orthopaedic Hospital, 40% of all procedures were performed under general anaesthesia. These consisted of 47 CT biopsies, 7 CT radiofrequency ablations (RFAs), and 12 US biopsies. At the Royal Orthopaedic Hospital, 86% of all procedures were performed under local anaesthetic, with no general anaesthetic procedures. These consisted of 61 CT biopsies and 83 US biopsies. All 256 patients having procedures in the CT room had no post-procedural complications or COVID-19-related symptoms and morbidity on follow-up. CONCLUSION: By adopting a pragmatic approach with meticulous planning, a limited, but fully functional image-guided interventional list can be run without any adverse patient outcomes.
Asunto(s)
Infecciones por Coronavirus/prevención & control , Sistema Musculoesquelético/diagnóstico por imagen , Neoplasias/patología , Pandemias/prevención & control , Neumonía Viral/prevención & control , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Biopsia , COVID-19 , Protocolos Clínicos , Arquitectura y Construcción de Hospitales , Humanos , Sistema Musculoesquelético/patología , Neoplasias/diagnóstico por imagen , Equipo de Protección Personal , Estudios Retrospectivos , Reino UnidoRESUMEN
PURPOSE: Acute bleeding is a life-threatening condition that can be effectively treated minimally invasively by interventional radiologists using transcatheter vessel occlusion (TCVO). The purpose of this study was to evaluate the availability of TCVO performed by interventional radiologists in Germany based on the DeGIR registry. MATERIALS AND METHODS: TCVO interventions from the years 2016 and 2017 were included (DeGIR module B). The number of interventions was assessed by state and region. RESULTS: TCVO interventions were reported by 242 clinics in Germany. 16â763 module B interventions were reported in 2016 and 16â399 in 2017. DeGIR requirements for certification as a training center were fulfilled by 160 facilities in 2016 and by 162 facilities in 2017. Normalized to one million citizens, an average of 211 TCVO interventions were performed in 2016 and 200 in 2017 (standard deviation was 101 and 109); the median was 202 and 222, respectively. In all regions TCVO interventions were reported. Only a minimal number of small regions showed a lower number of clinics offering TCVO interventions. CONCLUSION: The results from the DeGIR registry indicate comprehensive nationwide availability of TCVO performed by interventional radiologists with the necessary experience in Germany on the state level for the treatment of acute bleeding. Furthermore, the distribution of facilities fulfilling the requirements of training centers allows for good educational possibilities for young interventional radiologists in Germany. Only the distribution of clinics offering TCVO in a few small regions might lead to increased transfer times in the case of acute bleeding. KEY POINTS: · As a treatment for life-threatening acute bleeding in Germany, transcatheter vessel occlusion led by interventional radiologists is readily available on the state level.. · Furthermore, the distribution of facilities fulfilling the requirements of training centers allows for good educational possibilities for young interventional radiologists in Germany.. · Due to the good training conditions in Germany, it might be possible to further improve the situation in smaller regions by training more interventional radiologists and employing them in regions with less coverage.. CITATION FORMAT: · Nadjiri J, Schachtner B, Bücker A etâal. Availability of Transcatheter Vessel Occlusion Performed by Interventional Radiologists to Treat Bleeding in Germany in the Years 2016 and 2017 - An Analysis of the DeGIR Registry Data. Fortschr Röntgenstr 2020; 192: 952â-â960.
Asunto(s)
Hemorragia/terapia , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Sistema de Registros/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedad Aguda , Alemania , Accesibilidad a los Servicios de Salud/estadística & datos numéricos , HumanosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND/PURPOSE: Rare life-threatening complications after central venous line (CVL) placement in children may encourage the routine use of postoperative imaging, despite multiple studies demonstrating the limited utility of this practice. The aim of this study was to investigate the nature of this discordance. METHODS: A 10-question survey was sent to 1,239 members of the American Pediatric Surgical Association (APSA) addressing contemporary practices regarding CVL placement and postoperative imaging. RESULTS: Five hundred eighteen (42%) surveys were completed. The majority of respondents routinely obtain a chest radiograph (CXR) after image-guided CVL placement (52%). Years in practice, operative volume, and practice type were not statistically associated with postoperative CXR usage (all pâ¯>â¯0.05). 'Routine' users were more likely to cite "standard of care" (pâ¯<â¯0.001), position verification (pâ¯<â¯0.001), and complication identification (pâ¯<â¯0.001) as indications for use than those who use CXR selectively. CONCLUSION: Routine use of postoperative CXR after image-guided CVL placement remains common among pediatric surgeons. Significant variation exists in the indication for this study, with considerable disagreement between 'selective' and 'routine' users. Consideration should be given for an APSA standardized guideline utilizing a clinically-driven approach to CVL placement and postoperative imaging to align with evidence-based practice. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: N/A - descriptive analysis of survey results.
Asunto(s)
Cateterismo Venoso Central/métodos , Cuidados Posoperatorios/métodos , Pautas de la Práctica en Medicina/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Ultrasonografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Adolescente , Cateterismo Venoso Central/estadística & datos numéricos , Niño , Preescolar , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Lactante , Recién Nacido , Pediatría , Cuidados Posoperatorios/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Intervencional/instrumentación , Radiografía Torácica/estadística & datos numéricos , Sociedades Médicas , Especialidades Quirúrgicas , Cirujanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Estados UnidosRESUMEN
INTRODUCTION: Recently, the use of various endoscopic procedures under X-ray fluoroscopic guidance, such as endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP), interventional endoscopic ultrasonography (EUS), enteral endoscopy and stenting, has been rapidly increasing because of the minimally invasive nature of these procedures compared with that of surgical intervention. With the spread of CT and fluoroscopic interventions, including endoscopic procedures under X-ray guidance, high levels of radiation exposure (RE) from medical imaging have led to major concerns throughout society. However, information about RE related to these image-guided procedures in gastrointestinal endoscopy is scarce, and the RE reference levels have not been established. The aim of this study is to prospectively collect the actual RE dose and to help establish diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) in the field of gastroenterology in Japan. METHODS AND ANALYSIS: This is a multicentre, prospective observational study that is being conducted to collect the actual RE from treatments and diagnostic procedures, including ERCP, interventional EUS, balloon-assisted enteroscopy, enteral metallic stent placement and enteral tube placement. We will measure the total fluoroscopy time (min), the total dose-area product (Gycm2) and air-kerma (mGy) of those procedures. Because we are collecting the actual RE data and identifying the influential factors through a prospective, nationwide design, this study will provide guidance regarding the DRLs of ERCP, interventional EUS, balloon-assisted enteroscopy, enteral metallic stent placement and enteral tube placement. ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION: Approval was obtained from the Institutional Review Board of Toyonaka Municipal Hospital (25 April 2019). The need for informed consent will be waived via the opt-out method of each hospital website. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER: The UMIN Clinical Trials Registry, UMIN000036525.
Asunto(s)
Endoscopía Gastrointestinal/estadística & datos numéricos , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/diagnóstico por imagen , Enfermedades Gastrointestinales/terapia , Exposición a la Radiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Proyectos de Investigación , Fluoroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tracto Gastrointestinal/diagnóstico por imagen , Humanos , Japón , Estudios Prospectivos , Dosis de Radiación , Radiografía Intervencional/métodosRESUMEN
AIMS: To retrospectively evaluate the technical features, efficacy, accuracy, appropriate complications, and relationships among monitored parameters of computed tomography-guided biopsies of the retroperitoneum-located processes. METHODS: From December 2008 to December 2018, 208 percutaneous biopsy procedures for tumors, sized 14 - 190 mm in diameter (median size 57.5 mm), were performed on patients with suspected retroperitoneal tumorous process on imaging examinations. The patients were men in 124 cases and women in 84 cases, aged 20 to 90 years (median age 63.2 years). Skin to lesion distance was variable; from 43 cm to 178 cm (median length 108.5 cm). RESULTS: In 202 cases (97.1%) results were true positive or true negative; only 6 interventions (2.9%) were histologically false negative and had to be confirmed surgically. DLBCL and metastatic disease to the retroperitoneal lymphatic nodes were the most common diagnoses (23.1% each); lymphoma types were verified in 40.9% of cases. 7 complications in total were revealed, 6 of which were minor hemorrhages, and in one case ureteral injury was detected. A statistically significant relationship between the hypervascular process and complication incidence (P=0.00166) and needle gauge (P=0.01427) was identified. CONCLUSION: Percutaneous CT-guided biopsy performed in patients with a suspected retroperitoneal tumorous process had a high accuracy in establishing the correct diagnosis including histological subtyping. Simultaneously, the complication rate was low.
Asunto(s)
Técnicas y Procedimientos Diagnósticos/estadística & datos numéricos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Neoplasias Retroperitoneales/diagnóstico , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/métodos , Adulto , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , República Checa , Femenino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Estudios Retrospectivos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto JovenRESUMEN
The advances in technology have led to a growing trend in population exposure to radiation emerging from the invention of high-dose procedures. It is, for example, estimated that annually 1.2% of cancers are induced by radiological scans in Norway. This study aims to investigate and discuss the frequency and dose trends of radiological examinations in Europe. European Commission (EC) launched projects to gain information for medical exposures in 2004 and 2011. In this study, the European Commission Radiation Protection (RP) reports No. 154 and 180 have been reviewed. The RP 154 countries' data were extracted from both reports, and the average variation trend of the number of examinations and effective doses were studied. According to the results, plain radiography and fluoroscopy witnessed a reduction in the frequency and effective dose per examination. Nevertheless, European collective dose encountered an average increase of 23%, which resulted from a growing tendency for implementation of high-dose procedures such as CT scans and interventional examinations. It is worth noting that most of the CT procedures have undergone an increase in effective dose per examination. Although demand and dose per examination in some radiological procedures (such as intravenous urography (IVU) have been reduced, population collective dose is still rising due to the increasing demand for CT scan procedures. Even though the individual risks are not considerable, it can, in a large scale, threaten the health of the people at the present time. Due to this fact, better justification should be addressed so as to reduce population exposure.
Asunto(s)
Exposición a la Radiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Intervencional/tendencias , Radiografía/tendencias , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/tendencias , Europa (Continente)/epidemiología , Fluoroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Fluoroscopía/tendencias , Humanos , Neoplasias Inducidas por Radiación/epidemiología , Noruega/epidemiología , Dosis de Radiación , Protección Radiológica , Radiografía/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiología/tendencias , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricosRESUMEN
BACKGROUND: Transbronchial biopsy is a safe diagnostic approach for patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions; however, the diagnostic yield is low. OBJECTIVES: This study was conducted to evaluate the feasibility and diagnostic yield of transbronchial biopsy using the combination of an ultrathin bronchoscope, virtual bronchoscopic navigation (VBN), and cone-beam computed tomography (CBCT). METHODS: Patients with peripheral pulmonary lesions, no >30 mm, with the responsible bronchus, were prospectively included. An ultrathin bronchoscope and biopsy forceps were advanced to the target bronchus under VBN, 2D-fluoroscopy, and CBCT. We categorized the CBCT findings before biopsy into 3 types according to positions of the target lesion and forceps (CBCT target-forceps sign). In type A, the forceps reached the inside of the target lesion. In type C, the forceps could not reach the lesion. When the CBCT findings could not be categorized into either type A or C, the sign was categorized as type B. RESULTS: Although the target lesions were invisible by conventional C-arm fluoroscopy in 29 patients, CBCT visualized all 40 lesions. The overall diagnostic yield was 90.0%, and diagnostic yields for malignant and benign lesions were 92.0 and 86.7%, respectively. Diagnostic yields for CBCT target-forceps sign types A, B, and C were 100, 75.0, and 0%, respectively. Four undiagnosed patients proceeded to other diagnostic procedures based on the CBCT target-forceps sign (type B: n = 2, type C: n = 2) and were correctly diagnosed without delay. CONCLUSIONS: Transbronchial biopsy using an ultrathin bronchoscope guided by CBCT and VBN showed a very high yield in the diagnosis of pulmonary nodules.
Asunto(s)
Broncoscopía/instrumentación , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/métodos , Radiografía Intervencional/métodos , Nódulo Pulmonar Solitario/diagnóstico por imagen , Anciano , Anciano de 80 o más Años , Broncoscopía/métodos , Broncoscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Tomografía Computarizada de Haz Cónico , Femenino , Humanos , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/instrumentación , Biopsia Guiada por Imagen/estadística & datos numéricos , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Prospectivos , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía TorácicaRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: We aim to compare factors influencing safety, success rate and radiation dose of CT-guided biopsies and drainages in a non-teaching setting with experienced operators vs a teaching setting with residents. METHODS: A total of 1021 cases were retrospectively analyzed regarding lesion size, distance from skin, procedure duration, radiation dose, complications and clinical success. Procedures were grouped into biopsies of lung, liver, (remaining) abdomen, musculoskeletal system (MSK) and drainages of any region. Procedures in non-teaching setting were performed by experienced operators (full time interventional radiology staff), teaching setting consisted of residents under supervision of interventional radiology staff. RESULTS: Overall clinical success rate was 93.6 % [experienced (exp.) vs teaching setting: 93.5 and 93.6 %, p = 0.97]. Overall complication rate was 7.2% (5.7% minor, 1.6% major; exp. vs teaching: 8.0 and 6.5 %, p = 0.67]. Experienced operators performed chest and liver biopsies faster even though they were facing smaller lesions. Multiple regression analysis revealed that depth from skin significantly increased procedure duration by 36.8 s per cm (p < 0.001) and also radiation dose by 5.4 mGy per cm (p < 0.001) in all interventions. On average, teaching setting increased the duration of an intervention by 209.8 s and total radiation dose by 10.6 mGy (p < 0.001, p < 0.001 respectively). CONCLUSION: CT guided interventions can be performed safe und successful disregarding anatomical parameters or teaching setting. Depth from skin and teaching setting should be taken into account both from a clinical and a time-conscious point of view since they increase radiation dose and prolong operations. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: This is the first study with >1000 interventions which shows and quantifies the impact of lesion depth and teaching setting in CT-guided interventions.
Asunto(s)
Competencia Clínica/estadística & datos numéricos , Dosis de Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Tomografía Computarizada por Rayos X/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Humanos , Internado y Residencia , Masculino , Persona de Mediana Edad , Estudios Retrospectivos , TiempoRESUMEN
Interventional cardiologists count among the health professionals that are most exposed to ionising radiation. To minimise exposure, it is recommended that the patient be placed at the maximum distance possible from the X-ray source, but this recommendation has not been clinically validated. We aimed to investigate the impact of the average table height on the level of radiation delivered to cardiologists performing coronary interventions. The population for analysis included all invasive coronary procedures performed in our centre from March to June 2017. The primary endpoint was operator radiation exposure, as assessed using personal electronic dosimeters located on the operator's left arm. In total, 225 invasive coronary procedures were analysed. When the average table height was 1126 mm or more, the operators received a radiation dose that was, on average, 53% lower than when the table was lower than 1126 mm. This reduction remained significant by multivariate analysis adjusted for the operator.
Asunto(s)
Cardiólogos/estadística & datos numéricos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Intervención Coronaria Percutánea/métodos , Exposición a la Radiación/análisis , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Anciano , Femenino , Fluoroscopía , Humanos , Masculino , Estudios Prospectivos , Dosis de Radiación , Radiación Ionizante , Factores de RiesgoRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: Percutaneous biliary interventions (PBIs) can be associated with a high patient radiation dose, which can be reduced when national diagnostic reference levels (DRLs) are kept in mind. The aim of this multicentre study was to investigate patient radiation exposure in different percutaneous biliary interventions, in order to recommend national DRLs. METHODS: A questionnaire asking for the dose area product (DAP) and the fluoroscopy time (FT) in different PBIs with ultrasound- or fluoroscopy-guided bile duct punctures was sent to 200 advanced care hospitals. Recommended national DRLs are set at the 75th percentile of all DAPs. RESULTS: Twenty-three facilities (9 interventional radiology depts. and 14 gastroenterology depts.) returned the questionnaire (12%). Five hundred sixty-five PBIs with 19 different interventions were included in the analysis. DAPs (range 4-21,510 cGy·cm2) and FTs (range 0.07-180.33 min) varied substantially depending on the centre and type of PBI. The DAPs of initial PBIs were significantly (p < 0.0001) higher (median 2162 cGy·cm2) than those of follow-up PBIs (median 464 cGy·cm2). There was no significant difference between initial PBIs with ultrasound-guided bile duct puncture (2162 cGy·cm2) and initial PBIs with fluoroscopy-guided bile duct puncture (2132 cGy·cm2) (p = 0.85). FT varied substantially (0.07-180.33 min). CONCLUSIONS: DAPs and FTs in percutaneous biliary interventions showed substantial variations depending on the centre and the type of PBI. PBI with US-guided bile duct puncture did not reduce DAP, when compared to PBI with fluoroscopy-guided bile duct puncture. National DRLs of 4300 cGy·cm2 for initial PBIs and 1400 cGy·cm2 for follow-up PBIs are recommended. KEY POINTS: ⢠DAPs and FTs in percutaneous biliary interventions showed substantial variations depending on the centre and the type of PBI. ⢠PBI with US-guided bile duct puncture did not reduce DAP when compared to PBI with fluoroscopy-guided bile duct puncture. ⢠DRLs of 4300 cGy·cm2for initial PBIs (establishing a transhepatic tract) and 1400 cGy·cm2for follow-up PBIs (transhepatic tract already established) are recommended.
Asunto(s)
Sistema Biliar/diagnóstico por imagen , Dosis de Radiación , Exposición a la Radiación/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiología Intervencionista/estadística & datos numéricos , Adulto , Procedimientos Quirúrgicos del Sistema Biliar/métodos , Femenino , Fluoroscopía/estadística & datos numéricos , Alemania , Humanos , Masculino , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Radiología Intervencionista/normas , Valores de Referencia , Estudios Retrospectivos , StentsRESUMEN
OBJECTIVE: To determine the frequency and causes of canceled or aborted CT-guided interventions (biopsies, cytological aspirations, hookwire localizations, and catheter drainages), associations with patient and procedural variables, and subsequent management. METHODS: This study included 3052 consecutive CT-guided interventions (2487 biopsies, 80 cytological aspirations, 223 hookwire localizations, and 262 catheter drainages) performed in a single institution within a 13-year period. RESULTS: Fifty-two of 3052 CT-guided interventions were canceled or aborted, corresponding to a frequency of 1.7% (95% confidence interval [CI] 1.3-2.2%). Main causes in order of decreasing frequency included pain, lack of a safe window for intervention, impossibility to position the co-axial or biopsy needle in or near the target, inability to lie still, dyspnea and low oxygen saturation levels, non-discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy, impossibility to aspirate fluid or pus when attempting drainage, and impossibility to advance the drainage catheter in a fluid collection or abscess. On multivariate analysis, only catheter drainages and head-neck interventions were significantly at risk (p = 0.019 and p = 0.004) to be canceled or aborted, with odds ratios of 2.677 (95% CI 1.178-6.083) and 6.956 (95% CI 1.883-25.691), respectively. Of 52 canceled or aborted CT-guided interventions, 14 (26.9%) were repeated, 19 (36.5%) underwent a different non-CT-guided interventional procedure on the same target, and 19 (36.5%) did not undergo any subsequent intervention. CONCLUSION: The frequency of canceled or aborted CT-guided interventions is low, but is not negligible. Awareness of causes and circumstances under which they are more likely to occur may reduce the number of canceled or aborted CT-guided interventions. KEY POINTS: ⢠Approximately 1.7% of CT-guided interventions, for which the patient physically shows up at the CT room and which are considered useful by the radiologist, are eventually canceled or aborted. ⢠Main causes (of which some may be prevented) are pain, lack of a safe window, impossibility to position the co-axial or biopsy needle, inability to lie still, dyspnea, non-discontinuation of anticoagulant therapy, and impossibility to aspirate liquid or advance the catheter when attempting drainage. ⢠CT-guided catheter drainages and head-neck interventions are particularly prone to being canceled or aborted.