Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mostrar: 20 | 50 | 100
Resultados 1 - 20 de 5.034
Filtrar
3.
J Radiol Prot ; 44(2)2024 May 10.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38692267

RESUMEN

The European as low as reasonably achievable(ALARA) network regularly organises workshops on topical issues in radiation protection (RP). The topic of the 20th workshop was: 'ALARA for interventional radiology (IR) and nuclear medicine (NM)'. The objective was to examine the challenges faced when applying the optimisation principle (ALARA) in IR and NM and to consider how ALARA could be better implemented for patient and staff exposures. This memorandum provides a synthesis of the workshop sessions, and recommendations coming from the working groups discussion. Parallels are drawn with the recommendations arising from the 13th EAN workshop on 'ALARA and the medical sector (2011)' to consider how the optimisation challenges in IR and NM have evolved over the past decade. Current levels of exposure are presented along with operational practice and the challenges and opportunities for improvement, both in monitoring and practice. Whilst RP challenges remain, the application of ALARA appears more established in IR compared with experiences reported in 2011. The application of ALARA to emerging technologies in the NM setting is in need of further development to ensure that RP is considered at all stages in the development process of new radiopharmaceuticals. Besides the obvious technical and operational aspects, the importance of education and training, human factors and broadly the RP 'culture' were deemed fundamental to the success of the application of ALARA and where further emphasis is needed. All concerned parties, medical physics experts (MPEs), radiation protection experts, clinical staff, manufacturers and regulators have a role to play in the application of ALARA and this is discussed in the memorandum. Many of the recommendations from the 13th EAN workshop remain applicable today and overlap with the recommendations arising from the 20th workshop. This should prompt attention given that the use of IR and the development of novel radiopharmaceuticals for NM is only anticipated to increase with time.


Asunto(s)
Medicina Nuclear , Protección Radiológica , Radiología Intervencionista , Humanos , Europa (Continente) , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control
4.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 47(Suppl 5): 327-345, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38743338
5.
Eur Radiol Exp ; 8(1): 62, 2024 May 02.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38693468

RESUMEN

Artificial intelligence (AI) has demonstrated great potential in a wide variety of applications in interventional radiology (IR). Support for decision-making and outcome prediction, new functions and improvements in fluoroscopy, ultrasound, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging, specifically in the field of IR, have all been investigated. Furthermore, AI represents a significant boost for fusion imaging and simulated reality, robotics, touchless software interactions, and virtual biopsy. The procedural nature, heterogeneity, and lack of standardisation slow down the process of adoption of AI in IR. Research in AI is in its early stages as current literature is based on pilot or proof of concept studies. The full range of possibilities is yet to be explored.Relevance statement Exploring AI's transformative potential, this article assesses its current applications and challenges in IR, offering insights into decision support and outcome prediction, imaging enhancements, robotics, and touchless interactions, shaping the future of patient care.Key points• AI adoption in IR is more complex compared to diagnostic radiology.• Current literature about AI in IR is in its early stages.• AI has the potential to revolutionise every aspect of IR.


Asunto(s)
Inteligencia Artificial , Radiología Intervencionista , Humanos , Radiología Intervencionista/métodos
6.
Radiologia (Engl Ed) ; 66(2): 181-185, 2024.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38614533

RESUMEN

Pediatric interventional radiology is a dynamic and growing subspecialty. The new training pathways in interventional radiology, the maintenance of skills with a small volume of cases or complex procedures, the limited availability of specific pediatric equipment and materials pose significant challenges and opportunities.


Asunto(s)
Radiología Intervencionista , Humanos , Niño
7.
Eur J Radiol ; 175: 111401, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38604091

RESUMEN

PURPOSE: Several studies report occupational orthopedic problems among interventional cardiologists. These health problems are usually multifactorial. However, the personal protective equipment used should play a major role. An online survey was conducted to determine the frequency of such health problems among interventional radiologists and to correlate them with the use of personal radiation protective clothing. MATERIAL AND METHODS: An anonymous online survey that comprised of 17 questions was sent via e-mail to 1427 members of the German Society for Interventional Radiology (DeGIR) in Germany, Austria and Switzerland. The questions were focused on interventional workload, the use of personal radiation protection apparel and orthopedic problems. Given the different scale levels, the associations between the variables were analyzed using different statistical methods. A significance level of p < 0.05 was chosen. RESULTS: There were 221 survey responders (15.5% response rate). About half of responders (47.7%) suffered from more than five episodes of orthopedic problems during their interventional career. Lumbar spine was involved in 81.7% of these cases, cervical spine in 32.8%, shoulder in 28.5% and knee in 24.7%. Because of orthopedic problems, 16.1% of the responders had to reduce and 2.7% had to stop their interventional practice. The number of affected body regions correlates with the fit of the radiation protection means (p < 0.05, r = 0.135) and the reduction of activity as an interventional radiologist (p < 0.05, r = -0.148). CONCLUSION: Overall, the survey reveals widespread orthopedic problems at several body regions among interventional radiologists, associated with the fit of radiation protection systems, among other factors. A connection between the orthopaedic complaints and the radiation protection system used could not be established.


Asunto(s)
Enfermedades Profesionales , Protección Radiológica , Radiología Intervencionista , Humanos , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Radiología Intervencionista/estadística & datos numéricos , Femenino , Masculino , Enfermedades Profesionales/prevención & control , Enfermedades Profesionales/epidemiología , Enfermedades Profesionales/etiología , Alemania/epidemiología , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Exposición Profesional/estadística & datos numéricos , Ropa de Protección/estadística & datos numéricos , Persona de Mediana Edad , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/prevención & control , Enfermedades Musculoesqueléticas/diagnóstico por imagen , Radiografía Intervencional/estadística & datos numéricos , Austria/epidemiología
8.
Phys Med ; 121: 103361, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38669812

RESUMEN

Occupational protection could be improved in interventional radiology. The monthly personal dosimetry cannot alert on some occupational doses with anomalous values for certain procedures. Active electronic personal dosimeters linked wireless to a dose management system (DMS), allow for the measurement of occupational doses per procedure, integrating this information with patient dose indicators and with technical and geometrical conditions of the procedures. We analysed around 3100 occupational dose values for individual procedures collected during the last two years, in an interventional radiology laboratory of a University Hospital and two groups, with patient doses higher than 100 Gy.cm2, and lower than 30 Gy.cm2. An unshielded reference dosimeter located at the C-arm registers the ambient dose equivalent (ADE) per procedure to be compared with the personal dose equivalent (PDE) over the apron. The ratio between both values PDE/ADE is a good indication of occupational protection. Alerts for occupational protection optimisation are suggested. For the full sample, 8.4 % of occupational doses measured over the protective apron of the interventionists were higher than 100 µSv and 3.8 % higher than 200 µSv per procedure. Occupational protection for complex procedures (>100 Gy.cm2) had median values of 46 µSv for PDE and 3.3 % for PDE/ADE. However, for simple procedures, (<30 Gy.cm2) the median values were 10 µSv and 28.4 %. This last percentage is 9 times higher than the value for complex procedures. This lack of protection should be corrected and the need to reduce some occupational doses reinforced in radiation protection training programmes for interventionists.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Protección Radiológica , Radiología Intervencionista , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Humanos , Dosis de Radiación
11.
Radiat Prot Dosimetry ; 200(7): 693-699, 2024 May 08.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38679858

RESUMEN

This study presented a model applied for potential risk assessment in an interventional radiology setting. The model of potential risk assessment (MARP) consisted of the creation of a scale of indicators ranging from 0 to 5. The radiation levels were categorized according to gender, kind of procedure, value of kerma air product (Pka), and accumulated radiation dose (mGy). The MARP model was applied in 121 institutions over 8 y. A total of 201 656 patient radiation doses (Dose-area product and accumulated kerma) data were launched into the system over time, with an average of 22 406 doses per year. In the context of the workers (cardiologists, radiographers, and nurses) monitored during the MARP application, 8007 cases (with an average of 890 per year) of occupational radiation doses were recorded. This study showed a strategy for quality evaluation in fluoroscopy using a model with a compulsory information system for monitoring safety.


Asunto(s)
Exposición Profesional , Dosis de Radiación , Humanos , Fluoroscopía/métodos , Medición de Riesgo/métodos , Exposición Profesional/análisis , Exposición Profesional/prevención & control , Femenino , Masculino , Radiografía Intervencional/efectos adversos , Monitoreo de Radiación/métodos , Protección Radiológica/normas , Protección Radiológica/métodos , Radiología Intervencionista/métodos , Radiología Intervencionista/normas , Exposición a la Radiación/análisis
12.
BMC Emerg Med ; 24(1): 65, 2024 Apr 16.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38627690

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: A team approach is essential for effective trauma management. Close collaboration between interventional radiologists and surgeons during the initial management of trauma patients is important for prompt and accurate trauma care. This study aimed to determine whether trauma patients benefit from close collaboration between interventional radiology (IR) and surgical teams during the primary trauma survey. METHODS: A retrospective observational study was conducted between 2014 and 2021 at a single institution. Patients were assigned to an embolization group (EG), a surgery group (SG), or a combination group (CG) according to their treatment. The primary and secondary outcomes were survival at hospital discharge compared with the probability of survival (Ps) and the time course of treatment. RESULTS: The analysis included 197 patients, consisting of 135 men and 62 women, with a median age of 56 [IQR, 38-72] years and an injury severity score of 20 [10-29]. The EG, SG, and CG included 114, 48, and 35 patients, respectively. Differences in organ injury patterns were observed between the three groups. In-hospital survival rates in all three groups were higher than the Ps. In particular, the survival rate in the CG was 15.5% higher than the Ps (95% CI: 7.5-23.6%; p < 0.001). In the CG, the median time for starting the initial procedure was 53 [37-79] min and the procedure times for IR and surgery were 48 [29-72] min and 63 [35-94] min, respectively. Those times were significantly shorter among three groups. CONCLUSION: Close collaboration between IR and surgical teams, including the primary survey, improves the survival of severe trauma patients who require both IR procedures and surgeries by improving appropriate treatment selection and reducing the time process.


Asunto(s)
Embolización Terapéutica , Radiología Intervencionista , Masculino , Humanos , Femenino , Adulto , Persona de Mediana Edad , Anciano , Estudios Retrospectivos , Embolización Terapéutica/métodos , Puntaje de Gravedad del Traumatismo
13.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 47(Suppl 4): 55-325, 2024 Apr.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38658462
16.
Abdom Radiol (NY) ; 49(5): 1771-1777, 2024 May.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38502212

RESUMEN

BACKGROUND: Interventional Radiology (IR) is a highly rewarding specialty, both for its salutary effects for patients, as will as the satisfaction it provides for the operating radiologists. Nonetheless, arduous work and long hours have led to numerous reports of burnout amongst interventional radiologists (IRs). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Six long-term academic radiologists in leadership positions briefly chronicle their becoming IRs, their type of transitioning from IR, and the pros and cons of those respective transitions. RESULTS: The specific transitions include reduced time in IR, switching to diagnostic radiology, becoming involved in medical school education, ceasing IR leadership, and retirement. Pros and cons of the various transition strategies are highlighted. CONCLUSION: As the taxing work and long hours are so ubiquitous for IRs, and as burnout is so common, transitioning from IR is highly likely eventually for IRs. The varied transition experiences highlighted in this report hopefully will be helpful for current and aspiring IRs.


Asunto(s)
Radiología Intervencionista , Humanos , Agotamiento Profesional/prevención & control , Liderazgo , Selección de Profesión , Radiólogos
17.
Clin Liver Dis ; 28(2): 317-329, 2024 05.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38548442

RESUMEN

Hepatic encephalopathy (HE) is a clinically severe and devastating complication of decompensated liver disease affecting mortality, quality of life for patients and families, hospital admission rates, and overall health-care costs globally. Depending on the cause of HE, several medical treatment options have been developed and become available. In some refractory HE, such as spontaneous portosystemic shunt-related HE (SPSS-HE) or posttransjugular intrahepatic portosystemic shunt HE (post-TIPS HE), advanced interventional radiology (IR) procedures have been used, and shown to be effective in these conditions. This review presents 2 effective IR procedures for managing SPSS-HE and post-TIPS HE.


Asunto(s)
Encefalopatía Hepática , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular , Humanos , Encefalopatía Hepática/diagnóstico por imagen , Encefalopatía Hepática/etiología , Encefalopatía Hepática/terapia , Derivación Portosistémica Intrahepática Transyugular/efectos adversos , Radiología Intervencionista , Calidad de Vida , Cirrosis Hepática/complicaciones , Resultado del Tratamiento
18.
Clin Radiol ; 79(6): e854-e867, 2024 Jun.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38527920

RESUMEN

AIM: Training structure in neuroradiology can be variable, nationally and internationally. Globally, there is a trend towards standardised training pathways, curricula and targeted competencies. Currently, there is limited understanding of the structure of neuroradiology training in the UK. This survey aims to: [1] identify different contemporary models of neuroradiology training in the UK, [2] compare UK trainees' commitments against national and international standards, and [3] understand whether career expectations match the predicted future demands of neuroradiologists. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A survey was developed after consultation with BSNR and UKNG representatives. The eligibility criteria included current neuroradiology trainees in the UK with at least 3 months of experience or had recently completed neuroradiology training, but less than 18 months had elapsed since achieving a certificate of completion of training. RESULTS: A total of 50 trainees responded to the survey; 26 (52%) diagnostic neuroradiologists (DNRs) and 24 (48%) interventional neuroradiologists (INRs) with an overall mean age of 33 years. The mean duration of training at the time of survey was 18 months. The survey details trainee demographics, experience at work, research and teaching commitments and future goals. CONCLUSION: Most respondents are satisfied with their training and 90% want to remain in the UK after completion of training. There is room for improvement but the future of training and working in neuroradiology seems promising internationally, with ever-evolving techniques and developments. ADVANCES IN KNOWLEDGE: Advances in knowledge: This study evaluates neuroradiology training in the UK to enhance the training of future neuroradiologists, and safeguard the future of the speciality.


Asunto(s)
Educación de Postgrado en Medicina , Reino Unido , Humanos , Encuestas y Cuestionarios , Adulto , Femenino , Educación de Postgrado en Medicina/métodos , Masculino , Radiología Intervencionista/educación , Neurorradiografía , Curriculum , Competencia Clínica
20.
Cardiovasc Intervent Radiol ; 47(Suppl 3): 41-54, 2024 Mar.
Artículo en Inglés | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-38438683
SELECCIÓN DE REFERENCIAS
DETALLE DE LA BÚSQUEDA