Mathematical Modeling of Tumor Immune Interactions: The Role of Anti-FGFR and Anti-PD-1 in the Combination Therapy.

Bladder cancer poses a significant global health burden with high incidence and recurrence rates. This study addresses the therapeutic challenges in advanced bladder cancer, focusing on the competitive mechanisms of ligand or drug binding to receptors. We developed a refined mathematical model that integrates the dynamics of tumor cells and immune responses, particularly targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) and immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs). This study contributes to understanding combination therapies by elucidating the competitive binding dynamics and quantifying the synergistic effects. The findings highlight the importance of personalized immunotherapeutic strategies, considering factors such as drug dosage, dosing schedules, and patient-specific parameters. Our model further reveals that ligand-independent activated-state receptors are the most essential drivers of tumor proliferation. Moreover, we found that PD-L1 expression rate was more important than PD-1 in driving the dynamic evolution of tumor and immune cells. The proposed mathematical model provides a comprehensive framework for unraveling the complexities of combination therapies in advanced bladder cancer. As research progresses, this multidisciplinary approach contributes valuable insights toward optimizing therapeutic strategies and advancing cancer treatment paradigms.

A Tetravalent Bispecific Antibody Selectively Inhibits Diverse FGFR3 Oncogenic Variants.

The receptor tyrosine kinase FGFR3 is frequently mutated in bladder cancer and is a validated therapeutic target. Although pan-FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have shown clinical efficacy, toxicity and acquired resistance limit the benefit of these agents. While antibody-based therapeutics can offer superior selectivity than TKIs, conventional ligand-blocking antibodies are usually ineffective inhibitors of constitutively active receptor tyrosine kinases. Furthermore, the existence of multiple oncogenic variants of FGFR3 presents an additional challenge for antibody-mediated blockade. Here, we developed a tetravalent FGFR3×FGFR3 bispecific antibody that inhibited FGFR3 point mutants and fusion proteins more effectively than any of the conventional FGFR3 antibodies that we produced. Each arm of the bispecific antibody contacted two distinct epitopes of FGFR3 through a cis mode of binding. The antibody blocked dimerization of the most common FGFR3 oncogenic variant (S249C extracellular domain mutation) and inhibited the function of FGFR3 variants that are resistant to pan-FGFR TKIs. The antibody was highly effective in suppressing growth of FGFR3-driven tumor models, providing efficacy comparable to that of the FDA-approved TKI erdafitinib. Thus, this bispecific antibody may provide an effective approach for broad and highly selective inhibition of oncogenic FGFR3 variants. Significance: Development of a bispecific antibody that broadly inhibits gain-of-function FGFR3 variants provides a therapeutic strategy to target tumors with oncogenic FGFR3 point mutations and fusions, a particularly difficult case for antibody blockade.

Exploring chromone-2-carboxamide derivatives for triple-negative breast cancer targeting EGFR, FGFR3, and VEGF pathways: Design, synthesis, and preclinical insights.

Chromone-based compounds have established cytotoxic, antiproliferative, antimetastatic, and antiangiogenic effects on various cancer cell types via modulating different molecular targets. Herein, 17 novel chromone-2-carboxamide derivatives were synthesized and evaluated for their in vitro anticancer activity against 15 human cancer cell lines. Among the tested cell lines, MDA-MB-231, the triple-negative breast cancer cell line, was found to be the most sensitive, where the N-(2-furylmethylene) (15) and the α-methylated N-benzyl (17) derivatives demonstrated the highest growth inhibition with GI50 values of 14.8 and 17.1 µM, respectively. In vitro mechanistic studies confirmed the significant roles of compounds 15 and 17 in the induction of apoptosis and suppression of EGFR, FGFR3, and VEGF protein levels in MDA-MB-231 cancer cells. Moreover, compound 15 exerted cell cycle arrest at both the G0-G1 and G2-M phases. The in vivo efficacy of compound 15 as an antitumor agent was further investigated in female mice bearing Solid Ehrlich Carcinoma. Notably, administration of compound 15 resulted in a marked decrease in both tumor weight and volume, accompanied by improvements in biochemical, hematological, histological, and immunohistochemical parameters that verified the repression of both angiogenesis and inflammation as additional Anticancer mechanisms. Moreover, the binding interactions of compounds 15 and 17 within the binding sites of all three target receptors (EGFR, FGFR3, and VEGF) were clearly illustrated using molecular docking.

Antitumor Activity of Tasurgratinib as an Orally Available FGFR1-3 Inhibitor in Cholangiocarcinoma Models With FGFR2-fusion.

BACKGROUND/AIM: Cholangiocarcinoma (CCA) is an aggressive tumor with limited treatment options especially in 2nd line or later treatments. Targeting fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) 2 has recently emerged as a promising treatment option for patients with CCA harboring FGFR2-fusion. This study investigated the antitumor activities of tasurgratinib as an orally available FGFR1-3 inhibitor, in preclinical FGFR2-driven CCA models. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Antitumor activities of tasurgratinib were examined in vitro and in vivo using NIH/3T3 cells expressing FGFR2-fusion as FGFR2-driven CCA models, and in vivo using a CCA patient-derived xenograft model. The molecular mechanism of action of tasurgratinib was elucidated through co-crystal structure analysis with FGFR1, manual complex model analysis with FGFR2, and binding kinetics analysis with FGFR2. Furthermore, the cell-based inhibitory activities against acquired resistant FGFR2 mutations in patients with CCA treated with FGFR inhibitors were evaluated. RESULTS: Tasurgratinib showed antitumor activity in preclinical FGFR2-driven CCA models by inhibiting the FGFR signaling pathway in vitro and in vivo. Furthermore, cell-based target engagement assays indicated that tasurgratinib had potent inhibitory activities against FGFR2 mutations, such as N549H/K, which are the major acquired mutations in CCA. We also confirmed that tasurgratinib exhibited fast association and slow dissociation kinetics with FGFR2, binding to the ATP-binding site and the neighboring region, and adopting an Asp-Phe-Gly (DFG)-"in" conformation. CONCLUSION: These data demonstrate the therapeutic potential of tasurgratinib in FGFR2-driven CCA and provide molecular mechanistic insights into its unique inhibitory profile against secondary FGFR2 resistance mutations in patients with CCA treated with FGFR inhibitors.

Pemigatinib in previously treated solid tumors with activating FGFR1-FGFR3 alterations: phase 2 FIGHT-207 basket trial.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) alterations drive oncogenesis in multiple tumor types. Here we studied pemigatinib, a selective, potent, oral FGFR1-FGFR3 inhibitor, in the phase 2 FIGHT-207 basket study of FGFR-altered advanced solid tumors. Primary end points were objective response rate (ORR) in cohorts A (fusions/rearrangements, n = 49) and B (activating non-kinase domain mutations, n = 32). Secondary end points were progression-free survival, duration of response and overall survival in cohorts A and B, and safety. Exploratory end points included ORR of cohort C (kinase domain mutations, potentially pathogenic variants of unknown significance, n = 26) and analysis of co-alterations associated with resistance and response. ORRs for cohorts A, B and C were 26.5% (13/49), 9.4% (3/32) and 3.8% (1/26), respectively. Tumors with no approved FGFR inhibitors or those with alterations not previously confirmed to be sensitive to FGFR inhibition had objective responses. In cohorts A and B, the median progression-free survival was 4.5 and 3.7 months, median duration of response was 7.8 and 6.9 months and median overall survival was 17.5 and 11.4 months, respectively. Safety was consistent with previous reports. The most common any-grade treatment-emergent adverse events were hyperphosphatemia (84%) and stomatitis (53%). TP53 co-mutations were associated with lack of response and BAP1 alterations with higher response rates. FGFR1-FGFR3 gatekeeper and molecular brake mutations led to acquired resistance. New therapeutic areas for FGFR inhibition and drug failure mechanisms were identified across tumor types. ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT03822117 .

Phase 1b Trial Evaluating Tolerability and Activity of Targeted Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Inhibition in Localized Upper Tract Urothelial Carcinoma.

PURPOSE: We initiated a biomarker-informed preoperative study of infigratinib, a fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitor, in patients with localized upper tract urothelial carcinoma (UTUC), a population with high unmet needs and tumor with a high frequency of FGFR3 alterations. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Patients with localized UTUC undergoing ureteroscopy or nephroureterectomy/ureterectomy were enrolled on a phase 1b trial (NCT04228042). Once-daily infigratinib 125 mg by mouth × 21 days (28-day cycle) was given for 2 cycles. Tolerability was monitored by Bayesian design and predefined stopping boundaries. The primary endpoint was tolerability, and the secondary endpoint was objective response based on tumor mapping, done after endoscopic biopsy and post-trial surgery. Total planned enrollment: 20 patients. Targeted sequencing performed using a NovaSeq 6000 solid tumor panel. RESULTS: From May 2021 to November 2022, 14 patients were enrolled, at which point the trial was closed due to termination of all infigratinib oncology trials. Two patients (14.3%) had treatment-terminating toxicities, well below the stopping threshold. Responses occurred in 6 (66.7%) of 9 patients with FGFR3 alterations. Responders had median tumor size reduction of 67%, with 3 of 5 patients initially planned for nephroureterectomy/ureterectomy converted to ureteroscopy. Median follow-up in responders was 24.7 months (14.9-28.9). CONCLUSIONS: In this first trial of targeted therapy for localized UTUC, FGFR inhibition was well tolerated and had significant activity in FGFR3 altered tumors. Renal preservation was enabled in a substantial proportion of participants. These data support the design of a biomarker-driven phase 2 trial of FGFR3 inhibition in this population with significant unmet clinical needs.

A Phase I Study of KIN-3248, an Irreversible Small-molecule Pan-FGFR Inhibitor, in Patients with Advanced FGFR2/3-driven Solid Tumors.

PURPOSE: Despite efficacy of approved FGFR inhibitors, emergence of polyclonal secondary mutations in the FGFR kinase domain leads to acquired resistance. KIN-3248 is a selective, irreversible, orally bioavailable, small-molecule inhibitor of FGFR1-4 that blocks both primary oncogenic and secondary kinase domain resistance FGFR alterations. EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: A first-in-human, phase I study of KIN-3248 was conducted in patients with advanced solid tumors harboring FGFR2 and/or FGFR3 gene alterations (NCT05242822). The primary objective was determination of MTD/recommended phase II dose (RP2D). Secondary and exploratory objectives included antitumor activity, pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics, and molecular response by circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) clearance. RESULTS: Fifty-four patients received doses ranging from 5 to 50 mg orally daily across six cohorts. Intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (48.1%), gastric (9.3%), and urothelial (7.4%) were the most common tumors. Tumors harbored FGFR2 (68.5%) or FGFR3 (31.5%) alterations-23 (42.6%) received prior FGFR inhibitors. One dose-limiting toxicity (hypersensitivity) occurred in cohort 1 (5 mg). Treatment-related, adverse events included hyperphosphatemia, diarrhea, and stomatitis. The MTD/RP2D was not established. Exposure was dose proportional and concordant with hyperphosphatemia. Five partial responses were observed; 4 in FGFR inhibitor naïve and 1 in FGFR pretreated patients. Pretreatment ctDNA profiling confirmed FGFR2/3 alterations in 63.3% of cases and clearance at cycle 2 associated with radiographic response. CONCLUSION: The trial was terminated early for commercial considerations; therefore, RP2D was not established. Preliminary clinical data suggest that KIN-3248 is a safe, oral FGFR1-4 inhibitor with favorable pharmacokinetic parameters, though further dose escalation was required to nominate the MTD/RP2D. SIGNIFICANCE: KIN-3248 was a rationally designed, next generation selective FGFR inhibitor, that was effective in interfering with both FGFR wild-type and mutant signaling. Clinical data indicate that KIN-3248 is safe with a signal of antitumor activity. Translational science support the mechanism of action in that serum phosphate was proportional with exposure, paired biopsies suggested phospho-ERK inhibition (a downstream target of FGFR2/3), and ctDNA clearance may act as a RECIST response surrogate.

Derazantinib alone and with atezolizumab in metastatic urothelial carcinoma with activating FGFR aberrations.

BACKGROUND: This Phase 1b/2 study assessed the efficacy in terms of objective response rate (ORR) of the FGFR1/2/3 kinase inhibitor derazantinib as monotherapy or in combination with atezolizumab in patients with metastatic urothelial cancer (mUC) and FGFR1-3 genetic aberrations (FGFR1-3GA). METHODS: This multicenter, open-label study comprised 5 substudies. In Substudies 1 and 5, patients with mUC with FGFR1-3GA received derazantinib monotherapy (300 mg QD in Substudy 1, 200 mg BID in Substudy 5). In Substudy 2, patients with any solid tumor received atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks plus derazantinib 200 or 300 mg QD. In Substudy 3, patients with mUC harboring FGFR1-3GA received derazantinib 200 mg BID plus atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks. In Substudy 4, patients with FGFR inhibitor-resistant mUC harboring FGFR1-3GA received derazantinib 300 mg QD monotherapy or derazantinib 300 mg QD plus atezolizumab 1200 mg every 3 weeks. RESULTS: The ORR for Substudies 1 and 5 combined was 4/49 (8.2%, 95% confidence interval = 2.3% to 19.6%), which was based on 4 partial responses. The ORR in Substudy 4 was 1/7 (14.3%, 95% confidence interval = 0.4% to 57.9%; 1 partial response for derazantinib 300 mg monotherapy, zero for derazantinib 300 mg plus atezolizumab 1200 mg). In Substudy 2, derazantinib 300 mg plus atezolizumab 1200 mg was identified as a recommended dose for Phase 2. Only 2 patients entered Substudy 3. CONCLUSIONS: Derazantinib as monotherapy or in combination with atezolizumab was well-tolerated but did not show sufficient efficacy to warrant further development in mUC. Clinicaltrials.gov NCT04045613, EudraCT 2019-000359-15.

The Irreversible FGFR Inhibitor KIN-3248 Overcomes FGFR2 Kinase Domain Mutations.

PURPOSE: FGFR2 and FGFR3 show oncogenic activation in many cancer types, often through chromosomal fusion or extracellular domain mutation. FGFR2 and FGFR3 alterations are most prevalent in intrahepatic cholangiocarcinoma (ICC) and bladder cancers, respectively, and multiple selective reversible and covalent pan-FGFR tyrosine kinase inhibitors (TKI) have been approved in these contexts. However, resistance, often due to acquired secondary mutations in the FGFR2/3 kinase domain, limits efficacy. Resistance is typically polyclonal, involving a spectrum of different mutations that most frequently affect the molecular brake and gatekeeper residues (N550 and V565 in FGFR2). EXPERIMENTAL DESIGN: Here, we characterize the activity of the next-generation covalent FGFR inhibitor, KIN-3248, in preclinical models of FGFR2 fusion+ ICC harboring a series of secondary kinase domain mutations, in vitro and in vivo. We also test select FGFR3 alleles in bladder cancer models. RESULTS: KIN-3248 exhibits potent selectivity for FGFR1-3 and retains activity against various FGFR2 kinase domain mutations, in addition to being effective against FGFR3 V555M and N540K mutations. Notably, KIN-3248 activity extends to the FGFR2 V565F gatekeeper mutation, which causes profound resistance to currently approved FGFR inhibitors. Combination treatment with EGFR or MEK inhibitors potentiates KIN-3248 efficacy in vivo, including in models harboring FGFR2 kinase domain mutations. CONCLUSIONS: Thus, KIN-3248 is a novel FGFR1-4 inhibitor whose distinct activity profile against FGFR kinase domain mutations highlights its potential for the treatment of ICC and other FGFR-driven cancers.

Single-cell profiling of multiple myeloma reveals molecular response to FGFR3 inhibitor despite clinical progression.

Genomic characterization of cancer has enabled identification of numerous molecular targets, which has led to significant advances in personalized medicine. However, with few exceptions, precision medicine approaches in the plasma cell malignancy multiple myeloma (MM) have had limited success, likely owing to the subclonal nature of molecular targets in this disease. Targeted therapies against FGFR3 have been under development for the past decade in the hopes of targeting aberrant FGFR3 activity in MM. FGFR3 activation results from the recurrent transforming event of t(4;14) found in ∼15% of MM patients, as well as secondary FGFR3 mutations in this subgroup. To evaluate the effectiveness of targeting FGFR3 in MM, we undertook a phase 2 clinical trial evaluating the small-molecule FGFR1-4 inhibitor, erdafitinib, in relapsed/refractory myeloma patients with or without FGFR3 mutations (NCT02952573). Herein, we report on a single t(4;14) patient enrolled on this study who was identified to have a subclonal FGFR3 stop-loss deletion. Although this individual eventually progressed on study and succumbed to their disease, the intended molecular response was revealed through an extensive molecular characterization of the patient's tumor at baseline and on treatment using single-cell genomics. We identified elimination of the FGFR3-mutant subclone after treatment and expansion of a preexisting clone with loss of Chromosome 17p. Altogether, our study highlights the utility of single-cell genomics in targeted trials as they can reveal molecular mechanisms that underlie sensitivity and resistance. This in turn can guide more personalized and targeted therapeutic approaches, including those that involve FGFR3-targeting therapies.

Development of a degrader against oncogenic fusion protein FGFR3-TACC3.

Fibroblast growth factor receptor 3-transforming acidic coiled-coil containing protein 3 (FGFR3-TACC3), which has been identified in many cancers such as glioblastoma and bladder cancer, is a potent oncogenic fusion protein that induces constitutive activation of FGFR signaling, resulting in uncontrolled cell proliferation. Although several tyrosine kinase inhibitors against FGFR are currently under development, resistance to such types of inhibitors in patients has become a concern. In this study, a chimeric molecule SNIPER(TACC3)-11 (5a) was developed and found to reduce FGFR3-TACC3 levels effectively. Compound 5a conjugated KHS108 (a TACC3 ligand) to an LCL161 derivative (11) (an inhibitor of apoptosis protein [IAP] ligand) with a PEG linker (n = 2). Mechanistical analysis showed that cellular IAP1 was required for the reduction of FGFR3-TACC3 levels. Consistent with the decrease in FGFR3-TACC3 levels, compound 5a suppressed the growth of FGFR3-TACC3 positive cells. Thus, compound 5a is a candidate therapeutic with a novel drug modality against cancers that exhibit FGFR3-TACC3-dependent proliferation and exerts pharmacological effects distinct from FGFR3 kinase inhibitors because it lacks substructures crucial for kinase inhibition.

Targeted therapies: Expanding the role of FGFR3 inhibition in urothelial carcinoma.

The management of urothelial carcinoma (UC) has rapidly advanced in recent years with new approvals for immune checkpoint inhibitors and antibody-drug conjugates. However, while many UC tumors contain potentially actionable mutations, the role for targeted small molecule inhibitors has been limited. One such target is the fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) family of proteins. Activating mutations and amplifications of FGFR3 are common in UC with higher incidences seen in upper tract as compared to lower tract disease. Consequently, multiple FGFR-directed targeted therapies have been developed and trialed in both UC and other solid tumors harboring FGFR mutations. At current, erdafitinib, an inhibitor of FGFR1-4, is the only approved targeted therapy in metastatic UC following the BLC2001 study, which demonstrated a 49% overall response rate in patients with UC harboring an FGFR3 mutation. Additional FGFR-directed agents also continue to be investigated across multiple disease stages in FGFR-mutated UC including infigratinib, rogaratinib, and AZD4547, among others. Ongoing trials are combining these agents with immune checkpoint inhibitors and chemotherapy regimens. The precision medicine revolution has begun in UC, and FGFR3 inhibitors are leading the charge toward a more personalized, biomarker-driven treatment paradigm.

A phase 1 study of LY3076226, a fibroblast growth factor receptor 3 (FGFR3) antibody-drug conjugate, in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer.

Background We report a Phase 1 study of LY3076226, an antibody-drug conjugate composed of human IgG1 monoclonal antibody against the human FGFR3 attached with a cleavable linker to the maytansine derivative DM4 in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer. Methods This study was comprised of two parts: (A) dose escalation in patients with advanced or metastatic cancer and (B) dose expansion in patients with urothelial carcinoma with locally determined FGFR3 alterations. The dose range of LY3076226 tested was 0.2-5.0 mg/kg as an intravenous infusion on Day 1 of each 21-day cycle. The primary objective was to determine a recommended phase 2 dose (RP2D). Results Twenty-five patients were enrolled (Part A: 22, Part B: 3) and received ≥ 1 dose of LY3076226. No dose-limiting toxicities were reported. LY3076226 was generally well tolerated; most of the toxicities were Grade 1 or 2. Two patients experienced treatment-related Grade 3 toxicity (embolism and decreased platelet count). Four patients experienced serious adverse events (not treatment-related), all in Part A. Dose-proportional exposure was observed, with an estimated half-life of 2-7 days. No responses were seen with LY3076226 treatment. Stable disease persisting for > 6 months was observed in 1 patient receiving 3.2 mg/kg of LY3076226. Conclusion The study demonstrates acceptable safety and tolerability of LY3076226 up to the 5.0 mg/kg dose. Recruitment was stopped due to pipeline prioritization. Dose escalation of LY3076226 beyond 5.0 mg/kg in patients with advanced tumors may be possible. The trial was registered on August 19, 2015 under identifier NCT02529553 with ClinicalTrials.gov.

Discovery of Pemigatinib: A Potent and Selective Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor (FGFR) Inhibitor.

Aberrant activation of FGFR has been linked to the pathogenesis of many tumor types. Selective inhibition of FGFR has emerged as a promising approach for cancer treatment. Herein, we describe the discovery of compound 38 (INCB054828, pemigatinib), a highly potent and selective inhibitor of FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3 with excellent physiochemical properties and pharmacokinetic profiles. Pemigatinib has received accelerated approval from the U.S. Food and Drug Administration for the treatment of adults with previously treated, unresectable locally advanced or metastatic cholangiocarcinoma with a FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangement. Additional clinical trials are ongoing to evaluate pemigatinib in patients with FGFR alterations.

GZD824 overcomes FGFR1-V561F/M mutant resistance in vitro and in vivo.

Abnormallyactivated FGFR1 has been validated as a therapeutic target for differentcancers. Although a variety of FGFR inhibitors have shown benefit in manyclinical patients with FGFR1 aberration, FGFR1 mutant resistance such as V561Mmutation, has been reported. To date however, no FGFR inhibitors have beenapproved to treat patients with FGFR mutant resistance. Herein, we report that GZD824, athird generation ABL inhibitor (Phase II, China), overcomes FGFR1-V561F/M mutant resistance in vitro and in vivo. GZD824potently suppresses FGFR1/2/3 with an IC50 value of 4.14 ± 0.96, 2.77 ± 0.082, and 8.10 ± 0.15 nmol/L. It effectively overcomes FGFR1-V561F/M and other mutantresistance in Ba/F3 stable cells (IC50 :8.1-55.0 nM), and effectively inhibits the growth of Ba/F3-FGFR1-V561F/M mutantxenograft tumors in vivo (TGI=73.4%, 49.8% at20mg/kg, p.o, q2d). GZD824may be considered to be an effective drug to treat patients with FGFR1 abnormalactivation or mutant resistance in clinical trials.

Discovery and Optimization of a Novel 2H-Pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine Derivative as a Potent Irreversible Pan-Fibroblast Growth Factor Receptor Inhibitor.

Fibroblast growth factor receptors (FGFRs) have become promising therapeutic targets in various types of cancers. In fact, several selective irreversible inhibitors capable of covalently reacting with the conserved cysteine of FGFRs are currently being evaluated in clinical trials. In this article, we optimized and discovered a novel lead compound 36 with remarkable inhibitory effects against FGFR (1-3), which is a derivative of 2H-pyrazolo[3,4-d]pyrimidine. The irreversible binding to FGFRs was characterized by LC-MS. This compound has been shown to exhibit significant anti-proliferation effects against NCI-H1581 and SNU-16 cancer cell lines both in vitro and in vivo. Compound 36 has also demonstrated a low toxicity profile and adequate pharmacokinetic properties and is currently under validation as a potential drug candidate.

Biomarker-Oriented Therapy in Bladder and Renal Cancer.

Treatment of patients with urothelial carcinoma (UC) of the bladder or renal cancer has changed significantly during recent years and efforts towards biomarker-directed therapy are being investigated. Immune checkpoint inhibition (ICI) or fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) directed therapy are being evaluated for non-muscle invasive bladder cancer (NMIBC) patients, as well as muscle-invasive bladder cancer (MIBC) patients. Meanwhile, efforts to predict tumor response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC) are still ongoing, and genomic biomarkers are being evaluated in prospective clinical trials. Currently, patients with metastatic UC (mUC) are usually treated with second-line ICI, while cisplatin-ineligible patients with programmed death-ligand 1 (PD-L1) positive tumors can benefit from first-line ICI. Platinum-relapsed UC patients harboring FGFR2/3 mutations can be treated with erdafitinib, while enfortumab vedotin has emerged as a novel third-line treatment option for mUC. In metastatic (clear cell) renal cell carcinoma (RCC), ICI was first introduced as second-line treatment after vascular endothelial growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibition (VEGFR-TKI). Currently, ICIs have also been introduced as first-line treatment in metastatic RCC. Although there is no evidence up to now for beneficial adjuvant treatment after surgery with VEGFR-TKIs in high-risk non-metastatic RCC, several trials are underway investigating the potential beneficial effect of ICIs in this setting.

FGFR inhibitors in elderly patients with advanced biliary tract cancer: an unsolved issue.

Background: Despite recent advances in the understanding of the molecular landscape of biliary tract cancer (BTC), advanced disease continues to carry a poor prognosis, and the benefit from systemic treatments remains modest. However, BTCs have emerged as malignancies harboring specific potentially druggable aberrations, and thus, several molecularly targeted treatments have been recently tested. Among these, fibroblast growth factor receptor (FGFR) inhibitors have shown interesting results in previously treated BTC patients with advanced diseaseAreas covered: In this review, we aimed to provide an overview of available evidence on FGFR inhibitors in elderly patients with metastatic BTC, especially focusing on subgroup analyses of recently published trials exploring this novel therapeutic approach in these aggressive malignancies.Expert opinion: The FGFR1, FGFR2, and FGFR3 inhibitor pemigatinib has been recently approved by the United States Food and Drug Administration (FDA) in metastatic BTCs harboring FGFR2 fusion or other rearrangement. However, few data are available regarding the use of FGFR inhibitors in elderly BTCs, a patient population that remains seriously under-represented in clinical trials.