Clinical benefit for cryopreservation of single human spermatozoa for ICSI: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: Systematic reviews have focused on sperm recovery and post-thaw parameters after cryopreservation, but there is no information on the associated clinical outcomes. In recent years, an increasing number of studies have reported cryopreservation of a single sperm due to the importance of fertility preservation. OBJECTIVES: To assess whether the cryopreservation of single human spermatozoa improves clinical outcomes in patients with azoospermia or severe oligospermia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We conducted an extensive literature search using the following databases: CENTRAL, CNKI, Cochrane Systematic Reviews, EMBASE, MEDLINE, PUBMED, and Web of Science for relevant studies published through December 31, 2019. We calculated the pooled proportions of cryopreservation of a single human spermatozoon to assess the recovery, survival, fertilization, pregnancy, miscarriage, and delivery rates. Subgroup analyses were performed for the following covariates, (a) different carriers, (b) year of publication, and (c) source of sperm. RESULTS: We included 25 studies, which included 13 carriers. The pooled proportion of recovery rate of spermatozoa cryopreserved was 92% (95% CI, 87%-96%), and the survival, fertilization, pregnancy, miscarriage, and delivery rates were 76% (95% CI, 69%-83%), 63% (95% CI, 58%-67%), 57% (95% CI, 39%-74%), 12% (95% CI, 0%-33%), and 40% (95% CI, 12%-71%), respectively. Based on the subgroup analysis, the recovery and survival rates of frozen spermatozoa in a subgroup of different carriers were statistically significant. In the past decade, frozen single human spermatozoon technology has improved the recovery rates of frozen-thawed spermatozoa. However, the differences in clinical outcomes of frozen spermatozoa in subgroups of different sources of sperm were not statistically significant. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: The techniques for single human spermatozoa are feasible and efficient and may benefit patients with severe oligospermia or azoospermia.

FSH levels and testicular volumes are associated with the severity of testicular histopathology in men with non-obstructive azoospermia.

PURPOSE: The purpose of this study is to assess a potential association between FSH levels and testicular volumes with the severity of testicular histopathology on testicular biopsy in men with non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE). METHODS: A retrospective chart review was performed from the electronic health records of men who underwent microTESE with NOA. RESULTS: Eighty-six men with NOA underwent microTESE with concomitant testicular biopsy for permanent section to assess the testicular cellular architecture. The histopathological patterns were categorized by severity indicating the odds of sperm retrieval into 2 categories. The unfavorable category included Sertoli cell only pattern and early maturation arrest (n = 50) and the favorable category included late maturation arrest and hypospermatogenesis patterns (n = 36). In the men with unfavorable histopathologic patterns, the mean FSH level was 22.9 ± 16.6 IU/L, and the mean testicular volume was 10.4 ± 6.0 cc. This was in comparison to men with favorable histopathologic patterns revealing a mean FSH level of FSH 13.3 ± 12.0 with a mean testicular volume of 13.3 ± 5.9 cc. There was a statistically significant higher FSH level in men with unfavorable histopathology than favorable (p = 0.004) as well as a significant smaller mean testicular volume in men with unfavorable histopathology (p = 0.029). CONCLUSIONS: Higher serum FSH levels and smaller testicular volumes are associated with more severe testicular histopathological patterns in men with NOA.

TESE-ICSI outcomes per couple in vasectomized males are negatively affected by time since the intervention, but not other comorbidities.

RESEARCH QUESTION: Does time since vasectomy (as obstructive interval) and the presence of different male comorbidities adversely affect the likelihood of achieving a newborn for vasectomized males undergoing testicular sperm extraction (TESE) and intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI)? DESIGN: This retrospective study included 364 couples with vasectomized males undergoing TESE-ICSI cycles with autologous oocytes at IVI Valencia. The main outcome was live birth rate (LBR). Subjects were divided according to the male risk factor evaluated into quartiles (obstructive interval, body mass index [BMI]) or groups (hypertension, diabetes mellitus, dyslipidaemia). The reproductive outcomes were calculated per embryo transfer, per ovarian stimulation completed, and per couple. RESULTS: The average obstructive interval was 11.3 years. The LBR was 34.4% (95% CI 30.1-38.6) per embryo transfer, 27.8% (95% CI 24.1-31.5) per ovarian stimulation and 46.2% (95% CI 41.8-51.3) per couple. When considering obstructive interval, a significantly lower LBR per couple (P = 0.04) was found in the group with the longest obstruction time: Q1 42.1% (95% CI 33.5-50.7), Q2 49.1% (95% CI 36.1-62.1), Q3 56.3% (95% CI 46.7-65.9) and Q4 37.2% (95% CI 26.5-47.9) but the cumulative live birth rate (CLBR) was not affected (P = 0.63). LBR per ovarian stimulation of males with hypertension was significantly lower (P = 0.04) than healthy males: 13.5% (95% CI 2.5-24.5) and 28.6% (95% CI 24.7-32.5), respectively. The group of diabetic vasectomized males had a significantly higher CLBR (P = 0.02). The remaining risk factors assessed (smoking, dyslipidaemia and a high BMI) did not affect LBR compared with their healthy counterparts. CONCLUSION: Time since vasectomy appears to negatively influence the LBR when assessed per couple. The CLBR was not affected by the obstructive interval or the presence of other male comorbidities apart from diabetes, which had a significant effect.

Predicting successful sperm retrieval in transfeminine adolescents after testicular biopsy.

PURPOSE: Increasing numbers of transgender adolescents are receiving gender-affirming treatments (GAT). Given GAT can impair reproductive function, clinical guidelines advise prior counselling regarding fertility preservation (FP). For transgender adults assigned male at birth, FP is usually achieved via a masturbatory sample and sperm cryopreservation. This is less straightforward in transgender adolescents, since they may not be developmentally ready to masturbate and/or masturbation may cause unacceptable gender dysphoria. Testicular biopsy represents an alternative method for sperm retrieval in these adolescents, but for those in early/mid puberty, it is difficult to predict whether sperm will be found. The purpose of this study was therefore to identify factors that predict successful sperm retrieval for cryopreservation via testicular biopsy. METHODS: A retrospective cohort study was undertaken at a tertiary-referral pediatric gender service. Subjects were included if they'd received a testicular biopsy in association with the commencement of GAT between 2010 and 2019. The primary outcome measure was successful sperm retrieval, and potential predictors included age, testicular volume and serum testosterone, LH and FSH levels. RESULTS: Of 25 subjects who received a biopsy prior to starting any GAT, 17 had successful sperm retrieval. While age, testosterone, LH and FSH levels showed minimal differences, testicular volume was significantly higher in those with successful sperm retrieval, and a threshold of ≥ 10 mL showed 92% sensitivity and 71% specificity in predicting successful retrieval. An additional 6 patients received a biopsy after starting puberty suppression and before commencement of oestrogen, and one of these individuals had sperm successfully retrieved despite > 2 years of regular puberty suppression. CONCLUSION: These findings suggest that testicular volume is most useful in predicting successful sperm retrieval following testicular biopsy in transgender adolescents and are likely to be of relevance to other young people undertaking FP, including those with cancer.

Factors Influencing the Decision for Fresh vs Cryopreserved Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction for Non-Obstructive Azoospermia.

OBJECTIVE: To determine reproductive urologists' (RU) practice patterns for microdissection testicular sperm extraction (microTESE) and factors associated with use of fresh vs frozen microTESE for non-obstructive azoospermia. MATERIALS AND METHODS: We electronically surveyed Society for Study of Male Reproduction members with a 21-item questionnaire. Our primary outcomes were to determine RU preference for fresh or frozen microTESE and to understand barriers to performing microTESE. Pearson's chi-square and Fisher's exact tests were used to analyze categorical outcomes and candidate predictor variables. Firth logistic regression was performed to identify the predictors for preferring and performing fresh vs frozen microTESE. RESULTS: A total of 208 surveys were sent with 76 responses. Most (63.0%) primarily perform frozen microTESE for non-obstructive azoospermia, while 37.0% primarily perform fresh. However, in an ideal practice, 59.3% prefer fresh microTESE, 22.2% prefer frozen microTESE, and 18.5% had no preference. MicroTESE is performed most often (61.1%) at surgical centers not affiliated with a fertility practice. The most commonly reported barriers for both fresh and frozen microTESE are cost (42.6%), scheduling (33.3%), and andrologist unavailability (16.7%). There are no statistically significant differences between these barriers and performing fresh vs frozen microTESE. On multivariable analysis, reproductive endocrinology and infertility-based surgical center (OR 22.9; 95% CI 1.1-467.2; P = 0.04) and professional fee $2,500-$4,999 (OR 20.7; 95% CI 1.27-337.9; P = 0.03) are significant predictors of performing fresh microTESE. CONCLUSION: Frozen microTESE is performed more commonly than fresh, despite most RU preferring fresh microTESE in an ideal setting. Both fresh and frozen microTESE have a role in reproductive care. Barriers to performing fresh microTESE include cost, scheduling and andrologist availability.

Fertility preservation and sperm donation in transgender individuals: The current situation within the French CECOS network.

BACKGROUND: Many studies reported that reproductive desire could be high among transgender individuals. In France, fertility preservation and sperm donation were very little proposed to transgender individuals until recently, mainly because the Bioethics Law allows the use of assisted reproductive technologies only in infertile couples and prohibits surrogacy. OBJECTIVES: To evaluate the distribution of care on the French territory concerning fertility preservation and sperm donation in transgender individuals. MATERIALS AND METHODS: A multicentric national survey was carried out between January 2019 and October 2020 in 28 assisted reproductive technology centres of the French CECOS (Centres d'Etudes et de Conservation des Oeufs et du Sperme) network. Each centre was questioned to find out how many transgender individuals came, were informed and cared for fertility preservation and sperm donation. RESULTS: Concerning fertility preservation, 71.4% of centres received transgender individuals and performed gamete cryopreservation; 581 transgender individuals consulted for fertility preservation. Transgender women were more likely to desire (p < 0.0001) and achieve (p < 0.0001) fertility preservation than transgender men. Concerning sperm donation in couples including a transgender man, 68% of centres offer the complete course from the first consultation to the completion of the assisted reproductive technology cycles; 122 offsprings have been conceived with sperm donation in couples including a transgender man since 1999. DISCUSSION: Our results showed that even if all centres do not propose fertility preservation or sperm donation in transgender individuals, these assisted reproductive technologies are present throughout the French territory. The major point is that both fertility preservation and sperm donation in transgender individuals have grown significantly and that the care of these patients is improving year after year. CONCLUSION: In France, most of CECOS centres can take care of transgender individuals for fertility preservation and sperm donation. The French Bioethics Law allows these latter, and transgender individuals can benefit from a financial support of the national health care insurance for fertility preservation and sperm donation.

Intrasurgical parameters associated with successful sperm retrieval in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

BACKGROUND: Patients with non-obstructive azoospermia with a previously failed conventional testicular sperm extraction may undergo a salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction with the probability of successful sperm retrieval being almost dependent upon the number of previous surgical attempts and to different histopathologic categories. OBJECTIVES: To determine whether the seminiferous tubules pattern and the histological categories could affect the sperm retrieval rate in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia undergoing salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction after failed conventional testicular sperm extraction. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Seventy-nine patients undergoing unilateral or bilateral salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction were evaluated. During microdissection testicular sperm extraction, if present, dilated tubules were retrieved, otherwise, tubules with slightly larger caliber than that of the surroundings were removed. When no dilated tubule or tubule with slightly larger caliber was found, not dilated tubules were excised. A prediction model was built with seminiferous tubules pattern and testis histology as covariates. RESULTS: Sperm retrieval was successful in 30 out of 79 patients. The prediction model correctly classified 88.3% of cases, explained the 29.7% variability of the outcome, and significantly predicted the microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcome with a sensitivity of 67.7% and a specificity of 90.2%, Both tubules with slightly larger caliber and not dilated tubules were negatively associated with the chance of retrieving spermatozoa. Among the histological categories, only early maturation arrest was significant to the model (log(SSR) = 0.57 - 1.9SDT - 3.3NDT - 1.76EMA) (where SSR is sperm retrieval rate, SDT is tubule with slightly larger caliber, NDT is not dilated tubule, and EMA is early maturation arrest). The model had a clearly useful discrimination (area under the curve = 0.814), the estimated performance was 0.8105, and internal calibration was acceptable (p > 0.05). DISCUSSION: Seminiferous tubules pattern and testis histology may reliably explain the salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcome in all patients with non-obstructive azoospermia apart from those with early maturation arrest, where the homogeneous apparent seminiferous tubules pattern may be misleading. CONCLUSION: The outcome of salvage microdissection testicular sperm extraction can be predicted by the same intrasurgical parameters that have been demonstrated to predict the outcome of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in naïve patients with non-obstructive azoospermia.

Cumulative IVF outcomes after retrieval of testicular spermatozoa: should we use immotile spermatozoa for ICSI?

RESEARCH QUESTION: What are the cumulative clinical pregnancy rates (CPR) and live births rates (LBR) in intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) cycles using testicular motile compared with immotile spermatozoa, obtained from testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) or extraction (TESE)? DESIGN: A retrospective analysis of ICSI cycles using TESA or TESE over a period of 7 years. Cycles were divided into two groups according to the motility of the retrieved spermatozoa: Group A consisted of couples with motile spermatozoa; Group B of couples with immotile spermatozoa. Group B was subdivided into two groups: B1 consisted of couples with motile spermatozoa and B2 with immotile spermatozoa after the addition of pentoxifylline. RESULTS: No differences in CPR and LBR per transfer was found between the study groups after fresh embryo transfer. No pregnancies were achieved by vitrified-warmed embryo transfer in group B2. Fertilization rates decreased when using immotile spermatozoa (64.4%, 56%, 37.9%, for groups A, B1 and B2, respectively, P < 0.001). Top-quality embryo rates were higher in groups A and B1 compared with B2 (40.7% and 40.1% versus 19.1%, respectively, P = 0.015). Cumulative CPR (53%, 41.7%, 13.6% for groups A, B1 and B2, respectively, P = 0.005) and LBR (42.4%, 30%, 13.6% for groups A, B1 and B2, respectively P = 0.03) per oocyte retrieval was significantly higher when using motile spermatozoa compared with motile or immotile spermatozoa after adding pentoxifylline. CONCLUSIONS: Although fertilization, top-quality embryo rates, cumulative CPR and LBR decreased when using immotile spermatozoa, ICSI is still valid; therefore, it should be considered and offered to couples before embarking on a donor sperm insemination cycle, or cryopreserving oocytes for future additional testicular sperm retrieval.

Quantifying Heterogeneity of Testicular Histopathology in Men with Nonobstructive Azoospermia.

PURPOSE: We sought to determine if testicular histopathological heterogeneity is associated with sperm retrieval rates (SRRs) in men with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA) who are undergoing microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: All patients undergoing mTESE by a single, high-volume surgeon at a tertiary infertility referral center between 2010 and 2020 were evaluated. Pathology reports from testis biopsy at the time of mTESE reported by fellowship-trained genitourinary pathologists were reviewed. Testicular heterogeneity was correlated to absolute SRRs. Logistic regression was used to determine if heterogeneity was associated with sperm retrieval. RESULTS: A total of 918 men with mTESE were included. Of these, 391 men (43%) had 1 pathology, 388 men (42%) had 2, 108 (12%) had 3, and 31 (3.4%) had 4. Overall, the most common histopathology was Sertoli-cell only, followed by maturation arrest. The overall SRR was 42% with a clinical intrauterine gestation rate of 30%. Increasing histopathological variety was associated with higher SRRs (p <0.01); a SRR of 33% was observed when one histopathological subtype was present vs 94% with 4 subtypes. Furthermore, men with any foci of spermatogenesis had higher SRRs. CONCLUSIONS: In men with NOA, increasing testicular histopathological heterogeneity is correlated with higher SRRs driven by the identification of focal areas of spermatogenesis. This is an important, although predictable, observation. While diagnostic biopsy is not routinely required, these findings emphasize the value of having histology to perhaps predict the chance of sperm retrieval for future mTESE procedures.

Reproductive outcomes of microdissection testicular sperm extraction in hypogonadotropic hypogonadal azoospermic men after gonadotropin therapy.

PURPOSE: Male infertility caused by hypogonadotropic hypogonadism (HH) is not common. The main treatment is gonadotropins for 12 months or longer. If the patient is still azoospermic, conventional or microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE) may further help in sperm retrieval. We aimed to analyze the fertility outcomes of HH men treated at our institute. METHODS: From 2008 to 2020, infertile men with hormone profile showing HH were enrolled. Gonadotropin therapy was prescribed if parenthood was being considered. Assisted reproductive technology was available to help patients attain fertility depending on the results of sperm analysis. Patient outcomes, including sperm retrieval, pregnancy and live birth rates, were analyzed. RESULTS: Seventeen initially azoospermic patients were administered gonadotropins for an average of 11.1 months, and sperm was subsequently found in the ejaculate of seven patients (41%). mTESE was performed on the other ten (59%) who were still azoospermic. For these 10 patients, they had collectively undergone an average 12.1 months (range 6-23 months) of gonadotropin therapy. Sperm was retrieved in nine (90.0%) cases. After 11 cycles of TESE-ICSI, six (54.5%) successful pregnancies were recorded, resulting in five (55.6%) cases with live-born babies, including two sets of twins, and one case of missed abortion at 9 weeks of gestation. CONCLUSION: Gonadotropin therapy reversed azoospermia in a portion of the HH male patients studied. Of men who were still azoospermic after gonadotropin treatment, a majority could still have testicular sperm retrieved by mTESE for use in assisted reproductive technology, subsequently resulting in live births.

Testicular Sperm Aspiration (TESA) or Microdissection Testicular Sperm Extraction (Micro-tese): Which Approach is better in Men with Cryptozoospermia and Severe Oligozoospermia?

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate and compare sperm retrieval outcomes by testicular sperm aspiration (TESA) and micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction (micro-TESE) in non-azoospermic men. METHODS: We conducted a retrospective study of 145 consecutive testicular sperm retrievals in men with cryptozoospermia (n = 56) or severe oligozoospermia (n = 84). The decision to perform a TESA or a micro-TESE was made after thorough discussion of the pros and cons of these procedures with the couple. Final assessment of sperm recovery, on the day of ICSI, was reported either as successful (available sperm for ICSI) or unsuccessful (no sperm for ICSI). RESULTS: Mean sperm concentration, sperm motility, testicular volume and serum FSH level of men undergoing TESA were not significantly different from those of men undergoing micro-TESE. In men with severe oligozoospermia (<5 million/ml), sperm recovery was successful in 95% (18/19) of those who underwent micro-TESE and in 92% (60/65) of those who underwent TESA (P > 0.05). In men with cryptozoospermia, sperm recovery was successful in 88% (42/48) of men who underwent micro-TESE and 25% (2/8) of men who underwent TESA (P < .001). CONCLUSIONS: These data indicate that in men with severe oligozoospermia, TESA and micro-TESE are equally successful sperm retrieval techniques. However, in men with cryptozoospermia, sperm retrieval rates are significantly higher with micro-TESE than TESA.

Evaluation of the potential role of shear wave elastography as a promising predictor of sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermic patients: A prospective study.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Testicular sperm extraction (TESE) has been a useful diagnostic and therapeutic tool with sperm retrieval opportunity varying according to the pathological finding in azoospermic patients. Sonoelastography (SE) is an exciting radiologic method that can measure relative elasticity of different tissues in a selected region of interest (ROI) by depending on fast cross-correlation technique and a combined autocorrelation method. Real-time elastography (RTE) can be used for structural analysis of testicular tissue to detect pathological tissue alterations. We aimed in the current study to evaluate the efficacy of shear wave elastography (SWE) in predicting sperm retrieval in non-obstructive azoospermic (NOA) patients undergoing TESE. PATIENTS AND METHODS: This prospective study included 50 NOA patients who did two successive semen analyses with normal or elevated gonadotrophic hormones. All participants were subjected to SWE imaging on the testes by a radiologist. The measurements were recorded in terms of kPa using the SWE mode. They were done on each testis in the longest longitudinal plane. SWE images were viewed using dual mode: elasticity mode (kPa) and propagation (arrival time contour) mode then patients underwent TESE. RESULTS: A significant difference in SWE values was observed between patients with successful sperm retrieval and those with negative sperm retrieval providing 94.7% negative predictive value and 50.0% positive predictive value for sperm retrieval in NOA patients undergoing TESE with 75.0% sensitivity and 85.71% specificity (p  =  0.0001). Mean stiffness index measured by SWE correlated significantly with the histopathological types as 8 patients only were diagnosed as having severe hypospermatogenesis. DISCUSSION AND CONCLUSION: These prime data suggest that SWE as a non-invasive, easily applicable, and repeatable imaging method has a promising potential to be one of the reliable sonographic modalities that can be used as one of the predictors for sperm retrieval in NOA patients.

Sperm retrieval rates and clinical outcomes for patients with different causes of azoospermia who undergo microdissection testicular sperm extraction-intracytoplasmic sperm injection.

The aim of our study was to compare the sperm retrieval rates (SRRs) and clinical outcomes of patients with different causes of azoospermia who underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction-intracytoplasmic sperm injection (micro-TESE-ICSI). We conducted a retrospective study at the Reproductive Medicine Center of Peking University Third Hospital in Beijing, China, from January 2014 to December 2017. This study examined 769 patients with nonobstructive azoospermia who underwent 347 cycles of micro-TESE-ICSI. Patients with azoospermia were classified into Group A (Klinefelter syndrome, n = 284, 125 cycles), Group B (azoospermia Y chromosome factor c [AZFc] microdeletion, n = 91, 64 cycles), Group C (cryptorchidism, n = 52, 39 cycles), Group D (previous mumps and bilateral orchitis, n = 23, 23 cycles), and Group E (idiopathic azoospermia, n = 319, 96 cycles). Clinical characteristics, SRR, embryonic development, and pregnancy outcomes of the patients were compared between all groups. Patients in Group D had the highest and most successful SRR. The average SRR for all patients was 46.0%. The rates of clinical pregnancy, implantation, and live birth in Group D were 78.3%, 65.0%, and 74.0%, respectively, which were higher than those in all other groups (P < 0.05). Group B patients had the lowest clinical pregnancy, implantation, and live birth rates of all groups (P < 0.05). No differences were found in the miscarriage rate or birth defects among the groups (P > 0.05). Patients with orchitis had the highest SRR and best clinical outcomes. Although AZFc microdeletion patients had a higher SRR, their clinical outcomes were worse.

Fertility outcomes and predictors for successful sperm retrieval and pregnancy in 327 azoospermic men with a history of cryptorchidism who underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction.

BACKGROUND: Although few studies have reported fertility outcomes, no study has reported risk factors that might predict sperm retrieval and pregnancy in azoospermic men with a history of cryptorchidism in a large series. OBJECTIVES: To investigate fertility outcomes and predictors for successful sperm retrieval and pregnancy in azoospermic men with a history of cryptorchidism who underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction (mTESE). MATERIALS AND METHODS: This retrospective observational study included 327 azoospermic men with a history of cryptorchidism who underwent mTESE. Fertility outcomes including sperm retrieval, fertilization rate, number of transferred embryos, pregnancy, miscarriage, and live birth rates were recorded. RESULTS: Sperm retrieval was observed in 172 (52.6%) of the patients. The mean fertilization, pregnancy, and live birth rates were 55.2%±20.5, 53.5%, and 44.8%, respectively. The sperm retrieval rate was significantly higher at the orchidopexy age of ≤ 9.5 years (70.8%) than the orchidopexy age of > 9.5 years (42.1%) (P = .000). Patients with total testicular volume of ≥ 13.75 mL had significantly higher sperm retrieval rate (65.2%) than the patients with total testicular volume of < 13.75 mL (45.5%) (P = .001). Patients with total testosterone level of ≥ 300.5 ng/dL had significantly higher sperm retrieval rate (65.6%) than the patients with total testosterone level of < 300.5 ng/dL (40.3%) (P = .000). Patients with follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level of ≤ 17.25 mIU/ml had significantly higher sperm retrieval rate (72.3%) than the patients with FSH level of > 17.25 mIU/mL (44.4%) (P = .000). Younger male and female ages, and higher fertilization rates were the parameters that might predict pregnancy. CONCLUSIONS: Infertile azoospermic men with a history of cryptorchidism have high sperm retrieval rate with mTESE. Patients who had orchidopexy at the age of ≤ 9.5 years, and having total testicular volumes of ≥ 13.75 mL with total testosterone level of > 300.5 ng/dL and FSH level of ≤ 17.25 mIU/mL have higher success rate for sperm retrieval.

Male infertility treatment for cancer survivors: does anticancer treatment affect infertility treatment?

We investigated the impact of prior anticancer treatments such as chemotherapy and radiotherapy on subsequent infertility treatment in cancer survivors who consulted our male infertility division. Of 1,525 male infertility patients who consulted our division between 2008 and 2018, 56 (3.7%) were cancer survivors. Of these, 32 received anticancer treatment (group A) and 24 were treated with surgery alone or were seen before anticancer treatment (group B). Semen analysis revealed that azoospermia in 26 subjects (81.3%) and 14 (58.3%) in groups A and B respectively. Ejaculatory dysfunction was observed 1 in group A and in 2 group B subjects. Sperm cryopreservation before anticancer treatment was performed 4 subjects. Sperm retrieval surgery for intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was performed in 13 cases in group A and 10 in group B. Motile sperm were recovered in 7 subjects and in 8 subjects in group A and B respectively. Overall pregnancies and deliveries with ICSI were achieved for 7 subjects (21.9%) in group A, and 9 (37.5%) in group B. Successful sperm retrieval may not be affected by prior anticancer treatment as shown in this study. However, some patients abandoned infertility treatment due to the cost of testing and sperm retrieval surgery. Support for the cost of infertility treatment in cancer survivors is necessary.

Follicle-stimulating hormone may predict sperm retrieval rate and guide surgical approach in patients with non-obstructive azoospermia.

Testicular sperm aspiration- (TESA) or micro-dissection testicular sperm extraction- (MD-TESE) combined intracytoplasmic sperm injection (ICSI) was the only option for non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA) patients to have a biological offspring and they had different success rates in sperm retrieval. Our study aimed to find predictor(s) for predicting the sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in NOAs and guide clinicians in choosing different surgical approaches, TESA or MD-TESE for NOAs. 294 NOAs who had undergone TESA or MD-TESE were divided into TESA group and MD-TESE group. Depending on sperm retrieval, each group was divided into two subgroups: successful subgroups and failure subgroups. They respectively were 24 cases and 131 cases, 53 cases and 86 cases. Clinical data, including body mass index (BMI), testicular volume, and serum hormone levels, were analyzed in a retrospective manner. The results showed that follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) and luteinizing hormone (LH) levels and SRR were lower in TESA group as compared to these in MD-TESE group, while testicular volume was higher (P < 0.05). The surgical approach of sperm retrieval significantly affected the SRR (P < 0.05). In TESA subgroups, testicular volume, FSH and LH differed significantly (P < 0.05). In MD-TESE subgroups, the level of FSH and LH differed significantly between both groups (P < 0.05). Using logistics regression, we found a negative correlation (ß=-0.083) between FSH and the SRR in TESA group but a positive correlation (ß = 0.064) in MD-TESE group (P < 0.05). In conclusion, serum FSH level can predict the SRR of NOAs and guide the clinicians while selecting the suitable surgery approach for NOAs.

Prediction of microdissection testicular sperm extraction outcome in men with idiopathic nonobstruction azoospermia.

The aim of the present study is to assess whether the preoperative clinical indicators have an impact on sperm retrieval rate (SRR) in men with idiopathic nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA).We retrospectively studied 241 consecutive men with NOA who underwent microdissection testicular sperm extraction from 2016 to 2019 in the Reproductive Medicine Center, including 154 patients diagnosed with idiopathic NOA. They were grouped according to preoperative indicators, including average testicular volume, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone, Testosterone (T), and pathology, respectively.The overall SRR was 20.0% (31/155). Men with testicular volume of ≤5 mL had significant higher SRR than men with testes 5 to 10 and ≥10 mL (35.6% vs 12.3%, P = .002; 35.6% vs 16.2, P = .049, respectively). The SRR in men with FSH ≥ 24.8 mIU/mL was significant higher, compared with FSH level of 12.4 to 24.8 mIU/mL (32.6% vs 15.8%, P = .033). Men with Sertoli cell-only had significantly lower SRR than other pathological type (8.1%). Men with an FSH ≥ 24.8 mIU/mL in testicular volume ≤5 mL group had a significantly higher SRR than FSH level of 12.4 to 24.8 mIU/mL in testicular volume of ≤5 to 10 mL group (44.0% vs 11.4%, P = .002). Men with a luteinizing hormone level of 8.6 to 17.2 mIU/mL in testicular volume of 5 to 10 mL group had a poor prognosis, with an SRR of only 6.5%.Severely reduced testicular volume (≤5 mL) and severely increased FSH level (≥24.8 mIU/mL) had the better sperm retrieval outcome, which can be used as independent predictors in men with idiopathic NOA. And a combination of testicular volume and the hormone seemed to be useful in further increase predictive value.

Obesity with High Body Mass Index Does Not Influence Sperm Retrieval in Males with Azoospermia.

BACKGROUND The aim of this study was to evaluate the influence of male body mass index (BMI) on the retrieval of sperm from azoospermic patients who were undergoing testicular sperm extraction (TESE). MATERIAL AND METHODS The study included retrospective data of male patients suffering from non-obstructive azoospermia (NOA). Age, BMI, testicular volumes, the serum concentration of the follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH), luteinizing hormone (LH), testosterone, and prolactin were investigated and collected. RESULTS A total of 75 azoospermic males were evaluated between 2014 and 2019, including 35 patients (46.7%) with positive sperm retrieval. The majority of patients (57.3%) had normal BMI (between 20 kg/m² and 25 kg/m²) or first degree obesity (from 25 kg/m² to 30 kg/m²). No statistically significant correlation between BMI and positive sperm retrieval or hormone levels (LH, FSH, SHBG, prolactin) were found. However, lower serum testosterone levels were observed in patients with higher BMI (P=0.035). Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis showed that none of the hormones could potentially predict the positive outcome of TESE. CONCLUSIONS The hormonal levels or patient's BMI could not predict positive sperm retrieval outcome, however a negative correlation between serum testosterone and BMI levels was calculated implicating influence on fertility.

Open testicular mapping: A less invasive multiple biopsy approach for testicular sperm extraction.

This study proposes a testicular sperm extraction technique that was inspired by testicular fine-needle aspiration. Here, we have described the technique of open testicular mapping (OTEM) and evaluated the successful sperm recovery in 92 patients with nonobstructive azoospermia (NOA). All patients underwent an OTEM biopsy. Patients were divided into two groups; group I included men with spermatozoa recovered and group 0 included men without spermatozoa recovered. Age, follicle-stimulating hormone (FSH) level and testicular volume were compared between the groups. In 50 of 92 men (54%), viable spermatozoa were found after OTEM. No differences were noted in age, FSH level or testicular volume. Using OTEM, it was possible to retrieve spermatozoa in 54% of the NOA men.

Semen collection by trans-rectal digital stimulation and insemination campaign in goat.

The overall purpose of this study was to describe a method of semen collection via trans-rectal digital massage (TDM) and to carry out a related fertility trial in Angora goat. Sixteen Angora bucks (ranging 1-4 years) and 28 nulliparous does (1-2 years) were used in this study. Semen samples were collected via trans-rectal massage from 85.71% of the bucks in multiple attempts (18/21). The mean values of volume, pH, mass motility, total motility, concentration, viability, abnormal spermatozoa rate and ejaculation time were 0.64 ± 0.09 ml, 6.3 ± 0.21, 2.7 ± 0.34, 58.18 ± 5.1%, 3.68 ± 0.31 × 109 /ml, 71.38 ± 7.12%, 18.22 ± 2.48% and 3.4 ± 0.33 min respectively. Oestrus was detected with teaser buck and confirmed by using infrared thermography and ultrasonography (US). The success rate of synchronisation was found as 71.4% (20/28). On Day 21, pregnancy diagnosis was performed trans-rectally with US and the pregnancy rate was determined as 78.57% (11/14). TDM method of semen collection seems to be easily applicable to the buck and it could be a good alternative to collect semen as well as its use in artificial insemination campaign. Thermal monitoring is found to be a valuable tool to monitor the response to hormonal driven ovulatory synchronisation in Angora does during timed artificial insemination.