Reappraisal of optimal reconstruction after distal gastrectomy - a study based on the KLASS-07 database.

BACKGROUNDS: This study aimed to compare the incidence of bile reflux, quality of life (QoL), and nutritional status among Billroth II (BII), Billroth II with Braun anastomosis (BII-B), and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG). MATERIALS AND METHODS: We reviewed the prospective data of 397 patients from a multicentre database who underwent LDG for gastric cancer between 2018 and 2020 at 20 tertiary teaching hospitals in Korea. Postoperative endoscopic findings, QoL surveys using the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer questionnaire (C30 and STO22), and nutritional and surgical outcomes were compared among groups. RESULTS: In endoscopic findings, bile reflux was the lowest in the RY group ( n =67), followed by the BII-B ( n =183) and BII groups ( n =147) at 1 year (3.0 vs. 67.8 vs. 84.4%, all P <0.05). The anti-reflux capability of BII-B was statistically better than that of BII, but not as perfect as that of RY. From the perspective of QoL, BII-B was not inferior to RY, but better than BII reconstruction in causing fewer STO22 reflux symptoms at 6 and 12 months. However, only RY caused fewer C30 nausea symptoms than BII at 6 and 12 months, but not BII-B. Nutritional status and morbidities were similar among the three groups, and the operative time did not differ between the BII-B and RY groups. CONCLUSIONS: BII-B cannot substitute for RY in preventing bile reflux, shortening the operative time, or reducing morbidities. Regarding short-term QoL, BII-B was sufficient to reduce STO22 reflux symptoms but failed to reduce C30 nausea symptoms postoperatively.

A Randomized Controlled Trial of Acid and Bile Reflux Esophagitis Prevention by Modified Fundoplication of the Excluded Stomach in One-Anastomosis Gastric Bypass: 1-Year Results of the FundoRing Trial.

BACKGROUND: The advantages and disadvantages of one-anastomosis gastric bypass (OAGB) with primary modified fundoplication using the excluded stomach ("FundoRing") is unclear. We aimed to assess the impact of this operation in a randomized controlled trial (RCT) and answer the next questions: (1) What the impact of wrapping the fundus of the excluded part of the stomach in OAGB on protection in the experimental group against developing de novo reflux esophagitis? (2) If preoperative RE could be improved in the experimental group? (3) Can preoperative acid reflux as measured by PH impedance, be treated by the addition of the "FundoRing"? METHODS: The study design was a single-center prospective, interventional, open-label (no masking) RCT (FundoRing Trial) with 1-year follow-up. Endpoints were body mass index (BMI, kg/m2) and acid and bile RE assessed endoscopically by Los Angeles (LA) classification and 24-h pH impedance monitoring. Complications were graded by Clavien-Dindo classification (CDC). RESULTS: One hundred patients (n = 50 FundoRingOAGB (f-OAGB) vs n = 50 standard OAGB (s-OAGB)) with complete follow-up data were included in the study. During OAGB procedures, patients with hiatal hernia underwent cruroplasty (29/50 f-OAGB; 24/50 s-OAGB). There were no leaks, bleeding, or deaths in either group. At 1 year, BMI in the f-OAGB group was 25.3 ± 2.77 (19-30) vs 26.48 ± 2.8 (21-34) s-OAGB group (p = 0.03). In f-OAGB vs s-OAGB groups, respectively, acid RE was seen in 1 vs 12 patients (p = 0.001) and bile RE in 0 vs 4 patients (p < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Routine use of a modified fundoplication of the OAGB-excluded stomach to treat patients with obesity decreased acid and prevented bile reflux esophagitis significantly more effectively than standard OAGB at 1 year in a randomized controlled trial. TRIAL REGISTRATION: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04834635.

Braun Anastomosis: A Technique for Bile Reflux Improvement After Single Anastomosis Sleeve Ileal (SASI) Bypass; a Pilot Study.

Background. Single anastomotic surgeries can increase the risk of reflux, marginal ulceration, and gastrointestinal complications. Braun anastomosis prevents bile reflux after gastric resection and gastrojejunal anastomosis surgeries. The present pilot study evaluated Braun's efficacy in a single anastomosis sleeve ileal (SASI) bypass surgery.Methods. 28 patients with a history of SASI bypass surgery from October 2017 to September 2021 were included in the study. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on having Braun anastomosis to this surgical procedure; group A: underwent SASI bypass without Braun anastomosis; group B: underwent SASI bypass with Braun anastomosis. The surgical complications in terms of bile reflux, marginal ulcer, reflux esophagitis, and gastritis were evaluated and compared between the groups. Results. Bile reflux and reflux esophagitis were seen more in group A than in group B (37.5% vs 8.3% and 18.8% vs 8.3%, respectively). In contrast, 2 patients (16.7%) in group B had marginal ulcers compared to 1 (6.3%) in group A. Also, gastritis was seen in 1 patient in each group (6.3% in group A vs 8.3% in group B). However, the differences were not statistically different. Conclusions. Braun anastomosis is probably an effective procedure to reduce bile reflux, a concern of SASI bypass. Besides, further studies with a larger study population are needed.

Double tract-like gastric tube reconstruction decreases the incidences of delayed gastric emptying and bile reflux after esophagectomy: results of a pilot study of an experimental technique.

PURPOSE: Esophagectomy with gastric tube reconstruction is often complicated postoperatively by duodenogastric reflux and/or delayed gastric emptying and the accompanying symptoms, leading to patients being dissatisfied with their quality of life (QOL). Medical interventions to relieve patients of their symptoms are rarely effective. We began, in 2018, performing double tract-like gastric tube reconstruction, and, in a pilot study, we compared postoperative QOL between patients in whom this experimental reconstruction was performed and those in whom conventional reconstruction was performed. METHODS: Included in the study were 33 patients who underwent thoracoscopic McKeown esophagectomy with two- or three-field lymph node dissection for thoracic esophageal cancer between April 2015 and March 2020. A gastric tube about 4 cm in width was created in all patients, and in 14 of the patients (DT group), a double tract was appended by anastomosing the elevated jejunum to the anterior wall of the gastric tube, QOL was assessed 10-14 months later by means of the DAUGS-32 questionnaire, and bile reflux and the presence or absence of food residue were assessed by upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. RESULTS: DAUGS-32 food passage dysfunction, nausea and vomiting, and reflux symptoms scores were significantly lower in the DT group than in the conventional reconstruction group. There was no significant between-group difference in the incidence of postoperative complications. No food residue was seen in DT patients' gastric tube, and no reflux esophagitis was observed. CONCLUSION: Double tract-like gastric tube reconstruction shows promise as an effective means of improving patients' post-esophagectomy QOL.

The in vivo preventive and therapeutic properties of curcumin in bile reflux-related oncogenesis of the hypopharynx.

Bile at strongly acidic pH exerts a carcinogenic effect on the hypopharynx, based upon recent pre-clinical studies that support its role as an independent risk factor. We recently demonstrated in vitro that curcumin can prevent oncogenic profile of bile in human hypopharyngeal cells, by inhibiting NF-κB. We hypothesize that topically applied curcumin to the hypopharynx can similarly block early oncogenic molecular events of bile, by inhibiting NF-κB and consequently altering the expression of genes with oncogenic function. Using Mus musculus (C57Bl/6J), we topically applied curcumin (250 µmol/L; three times per day; 10 days) to the hypopharynx, 15 minutes before, 15 minutes after or in combination with bile acids (pH 3.0). Immunohistochemical analysis and qPCR revealed that topically applied curcumin either before, after or in combination with acidic bile exposure significantly suppressed its induced NF-κB activation in regenerating epithelial cells, and overexpression of Rela, Bcl2, Egfr, Stat3, Wnt5a, Tnf, Il6, Ptgs2. Akt1 was particularly inhibited by curcumin when applied simultaneously with bile. We provide novel evidence into the preventive and therapeutic properties of topically applied curcumin in acidic bile-induced early oncogenic molecular events in hypopharyngeal mucosa, by inhibiting NF-κB, and shaping future translational development of effective targeted therapies using topical non-pharmacologic inhibitors of NF-κB.

Four reconstruction methods after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: A systematic review and network meta-analysis.

BACKGROUND: There is no consensus regarding which reconstruction methods are superior after laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (LDG). This study compared four reconstruction methods after LDG for gastric cancer. METHODS: Literature in EMBASE, PubMed, and the Cochrane Library was screened to compare Billroth I (B-I), Billroth II (B-II), Roux-en-Y (RY), and uncut Roux-en-Y (URY) anastomoses after LDG for gastric cancer. A Bayesian network meta-analysis (NMA) was conducted to compare these methods. RESULTS: Eighteen studies involving 4347 patients were eligible for our NMA. The operative time in RY anastomosis was longer than that in B-I and B-II anastomoses. Blood loss and risk of gastrointestinal motility dysfunction were greater with RY anastomosis than with URY or B-I anastomosis. Furthermore, URY anastomosis was superior to the other 3 reconstruction methods for preventing food residue. For remnant gastritis, RY anastomosis was significantly superior to B-I and B-II anastomoses, whereas URY anastomosis was significantly superior to B-II anastomosis. In addition, RY and URY anastomoses were better than B-I and B-II anastomoses for preventing bile reflux. CONCLUSIONS: URY anastomosis tended to be a more favorable reconstruction method after LDG due to its operative simplicity and reduced long-term complications.

New antireflux plastic stent for patients with distal malignant biliary obstruction.

BACKGROUND: Endoscopic biliary stenting is a well-established palliative treatment for patients with unresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO). However, the main problem with stent placement is the relatively short duration of stent patency. Although self-expanding metal stents (SEMSs) have a longer patency period than plastic stents (PSs), the higher costs limit the wide use of SEMSs. A PS with an antireflux valve is an attractive idea to prolong stent patency, but no ideal design for an antireflux PS (ARPS) has been proposed. We developed a new ARPS with a "duckbilled" valve attached to the duodenal end of the stent. AIM: To compare the patency of ARPSs with that of traditional PSs (TPSs) in patients with unresectable distal MBO. METHODS: We conducted a single-center, prospective, randomized, controlled, double-blind study. This study was conducted at the West China Hospital of Sichuan University. Consecutive patients with extrahepatic MBO were enrolled prospectively. Eligible patients were randomly assigned to receive either an ARPS or a TPS. Patients were followed by clinic visits or telephone interviews every 1-2 mo until stent exchange, death, or the final study follow-up in October 2018. The primary outcome was the duration of stent patency. Secondary outcomes included the rate of technical success, the rate of clinical success, adverse events, and patient survival. RESULTS: Between February 2016 and December 2017, 38 patients were randomly assigned to two groups, with 19 patients in each group, to receive ARPSs or TPSs. Stent insertion was technically successful in all patients. There were no significant differences between the two groups in the rates of clinical success or the rates of early or late adverse events (P = 0.660, 1.000, and 1.000, respectively). The median duration of stent patency in the ARPS group was 285 d [interquartile range (IQR), 170], which was significantly longer than that in the TPS group (median, 130 d; IQR, 90, P = 0.005). No significant difference in patient survival was noted between the two groups (P = 0.900). CONCLUSION: The new ARPS is safe and effective for the palliation of unresectable distal MBO, and has a significantly longer stent patency than a TPS.

Antireflux covered metal stent for nonresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction: Multicenter randomized controlled trial.

BACKGROUND AND AIM: An antireflux metal stent (ARMS) for nonresectable distal malignant biliary obstruction (MBO) may prevent recurrent biliary obstruction (RBO) as a result of duodenobiliary reflux and prolong time to RBO (TRBO). Superiority of ARMS over conventional covered self-expandable metal stents (SEMS) has not been fully examined. METHODS: We conducted a multicenter randomized controlled trial to examine whether TRBO of an ARMS with a funnel-shaped valve was longer than that of a covered SEMS in SEMS-naïve patients. We enrolled 104 patients (52 patients per arm) at 11 hospitals in Japan. Secondary outcomes included causes of RBO, adverse events, and patient survival. RESULTS: TRBO did not differ significantly between the ARMS and covered SEMS groups (median, 251 vs 351 days, respectively; P = 0.11). RBO as a result of biliary sludge or food impaction was observed in 13% and 9.8% of patients who received an ARMS and covered SEMS, respectively (P = 0.83). ARMS was associated with a higher rate of stent migration compared with the covered SEMS (31% vs 12%, P = 0.038). Overall rates of adverse events were 20% and 18% in the ARMS and covered SEMS groups, respectively (P = 0.97). No significant between-group difference in patient survival was observed (P = 0.26). CONCLUSIONS: The current ARMS was not associated with longer TRBO compared with the covered SEMS. Modifications including addition of an anti-migration system are required to use the current ARMS as first-line palliative treatment of distal MBO (UMIN-CTR clinical trial registration number: UMIN000014784).

Comparative study of outcomes of Roux-en-Y reconstruction and Billroth â reconstruction performed after radical distal gastrectomy.

BACKGROUND: Billroth Ⅰ (BⅠ) reconstruction and Roux-en-Y (RY) reconstruction are both commonly performed after distal gastrectomy (DG). We conducted a retrospective study to evaluate which is the better option. METHODS: Included in our study were 162 patients who, between April 2011 and October 2015, underwent DG followed by BⅠ reconstruction (n = 93) or RY reconstruction (n = 69). All patients were followed up for at least 1 year. We compared perioperative outcomes, postoperative complications, gastrointestinal (GI) symptoms, endoscopic findings, and nutritional status between the 2 groups of patients. RESULTS: Patient characteristics did not differ between the 2 groups, with the exception of the incidence of gastric body tumors, which was significantly higher in the RY group (73.9% vs. 19.4%; p < 0.001). Operation time was significantly longer in the RY reconstruction group (p < 0.001). There was no significant between-group difference in the grades of GI dysfunction (p = 0.122).The endoscopically determined RGB (Residual food, Gastritis, Bile reflux)scores were significantly better in the RY reconstruction group than in the BI reconstruction group (p = 0.027, p < 0.001,p < 0.001,respectively).There was also no significant between-group difference in the change (1-year postoperative value/preoperative value) in body weight, body mass index, serum albumin concentration, or total cholesterol concentration (p = 0.484,p = 0.613,p = 0.760,p = 0.890, respectively). CONCLUSIONS: RY reconstruction appears not to be advantageous over BⅠ reconstruction in terms of GI function or nutritional status 1 year after surgery. RY reconstruction does appear to be superior in terms of preventing bile reflux but takes more operation time.

Randomized controlled trial of uncut Roux-en-Y vs Billroth II reconstruction after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer: Which technique is better for avoiding biliary reflux and gastritis?

AIM: To identify which technique is better for avoiding biliary reflux and gastritis between uncut Roux-en-Y and Billroth II reconstruction. METHODS: A total of 158 patients who underwent laparoscopy-assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer at the First Hospital of Jilin University (Changchun, China) between February 2015 and February 2016 were randomized into two groups: uncut Roux-en-Y (group U) and Billroth II group (group B). Postoperative complications and relevant clinical data were compared between the two groups. RESULTS: According to the randomization table, each group included 79 patients. There was no significant difference in postoperative complications between groups U and B (7.6% vs 10.1%, P = 0.576). During the postoperative period, group U stomach pH values were lower than 7 and group B pH values were higher than 7. After 1 year of follow-up, group B presented a higher incidence of biliary reflux and alkaline gastritis. However, histopathology did not show a significant difference in gastritis diagnosis (P = 0.278), and the amount of residual food and gain of weight between the groups were also not significantly different. At 3 mo there was no evidence of partial recanalization of uncut staple line, but at 1 year the incidence was 13%. CONCLUSION: Compared with Billroth II reconstruction, uncut Roux-en-Y reconstruction is secure and feasible, and can effectively reduce the incidence of alkaline reflux, residual gastritis, and heartburn. Despite the incidence of recanalization, uncut Roux-en-Y should be widely applied.

Quality of life and impact of bile reflux after retro colic retro gastric gastrojejunostomy in Whipple surgery.

BACKGROUND: Delayed gastric emptying and bile reflux are common concerns in long-term survivors after Whipple surgery. The study was designed to assess modified retro colic retro gastric gastrojejunostomy in reducing macro and microscopic bile reflux and impact on dyspepsia related quality of life in long-term survivors. METHODS: Out of 43 patients operated, 23 long-term survivors were included. All underwent gastroscopy and bile reflux was grouped as normal, yellowish bile lakes and presence of greenish bile lakes. Six standard gastric biopsies were taken. Microscopic bile reflux index (BRI) was calculated and a score more than 14 was considered significant. Validated Nepean dyspepsia index-short form (NDI-SF) was used to assess the severity of dyspepsia-related quality of life and compared with age and gender-matched control. RESULTS: The median age was 48 (21-70) years. Median survival of the group was 37 months (6-40). Endoscopically, 20/23 (87%) had macroscopic bile reflux (74% yellowish bile lakes, 13% greenish bile lakes). None had stomal ulcers or macroscopic inflammation. Mean bile reflux index score was 9.7 (range 1.77-34). Mean NDI-SF score of Whipple group was 23.1 (SD 8.88). In controls, mean score was 19.9 (SD 8.23), showing no significant difference (p = 0.245). CONCLUSIONS: Though there was macroscopic bile reflux, clinical symptoms and microscopic changes were minimal. The modified technique had good long-term results.

Antireflux metal stent with an antimigration system for distal malignant biliary obstruction: a feasibility pilot study.

An antireflux metal stent (ARMS) for distal malignant biliary obstruction has been reported to be useful, but the effectiveness of a flared-end structure to prevent migration on ARMS remains unclear. To evaluate the feasibility of a newly designed ARMS with both ends flared, 8 patients with covered metal stent occlusion due to sludge or food impaction were enrolled. ARMS were placed successfully after endoscopic removal of the occluded stents in all patients, and no procedure-related complication was observed. The median time to recurrent biliary obstruction was 71 days. ARMS occlusion occurred in 3 (38%) patients (sludge in 2 patients and hemobilia in 1). ARMS migration occurred in 1 (13%) patient. As a late complication, cholecystitis occurred in 1 (13%) patient. In conclusion, our newly designed ARMS with an antimigration system was technically feasible and safe, and a further investigation is warranted to evaluate the effectiveness of the current antimigration system.

The evolving role of post-ligament of Trietz nasojejunal feeding in enteral nutrition and the need for improved feeding tube design and placement methods.

Nutrition support is an important link in the chain of therapy for intensive care unit patients. The early institution of nutrition support significantly reduces the incidence of septic complications, reduces mortality, and shortens hospital stay. Unfortunately, impaired gastrointestinal function, particularly gastric atony, restricts the use of nasogastric enteral tube feeding, and the use of this route of administration in these patients can lead to regurgitation, aspiration, and the development of pneumonia. Postpyloric enteral feeding was heralded as a means of overcoming many of these problems. Overall, the results of controlled studies do not support a role of postpyloric duodenal feeding in reducing the incidence of aspiration pneumonia. As a consequence, post-ligament of Treitz nasojejunal enteral feeding is proposed as the technique of choice in these patients. Feeding tube design must incorporate a gastric aspiration port to overcome problems of gastroesophageal acid reflux, duodenogastric bile reflux, and increased gastric acid secretion, problems that occur during "downstream" jejunal feeding. Tube placement technique will need to be refined and patients will need to receive a predigested enteral diet. In postoperative surgical patients in the intensive care unit, there is also a need for a newly designed dual-purpose nasogastric tube capable initially of providing a means of undertaking gastric aspiration and decompression and subsequently a means of initiating nasogastric enteral feeding.

[The method of the isolated reconstruction by gastropancreatoduodenal resection].

The modification of the reconstructive stage of gastropancreatoduodenal resection aims to increase the security of the pancreatojejunoanastomosis by minimizing the impact of such aggressive substances as bile and pancreatic juice. The modification represents the isolated pancreatojejunoanastomosis on the Roux-en-Y intestinal loop and gastro- and hepaticojejunoanastomoses on the second intestinal loop, separated with the use of the stub. Thus, the method allows the separate passage of pancreatic juice, bile and gastric contents, excluding their impact on other anastomoses. The described modification was performed in 6 patients. There were no cases of the anastomotic insufficiency. The mean hospital stay was 10,5 days. Thus. The method proved to be effective and safe, providing good initial results.

A shorter loop in Roux-Y hepatojejunostomy reconstruction for choledochal cysts is equally effective: preliminary results of a prospective randomized study.

BACKGROUND: Conventionally, an adult's standard of a 40-cm loop is adopted in Roux-Y hepatojejunostomy (RYHJ) in choledochal cyst (CDC) in children, irrespective of patient size. The redundant length of the jejunal limb may lead to complications. We compared the outcome of an individualized short Roux loop with the standard loop length in RYHJ in children with CDC. METHODS: Two hundred eighteen children with CDC undergoing laparoscopic RYHJ were prospectively randomized into 2 groups: (1) conventional group (CG; n = 108) where a standard 35-40 cm Roux-loop length was used regardless of the child's size and (2) short loop group (SLG; n = 110) in which the Roux-loop length was based on the distance between hepatic hilum and umbilicus. Ultrasonography, upper gastrointestinal contrast studies, and laboratory tests were conducted during the follow-up period. RESULTS: The mean Roux-loop length of SLG was significantly shorter than that of CG (Student t test, P < .05). There was no significant difference between the 2 groups in age, operative blood loss, operative time, postoperative hospital stay, and duration of drainage. In CG, 2 of (1.8%) 108 patients developed Roux-loop obstruction, whereas none was detected in SLG (0%). Mild reflux was detected in 2 CG patients and 1 SLG patient 1 month postoperatively, all of which subsided 6 months later. No episodes of cholangitis were observed in either group. CONCLUSIONS: An individualized short Roux-loop length in RYHJ is as effective as the conventional Roux-loop length.

What is the difference between proximal and total gastrectomy regarding postoperative bile reflux into the oesophagus?

BACKGROUND: Tumours of the oesophagogastric junction and the gastric cardia can be treated either with proximal or with total gastrectomy. Reflux of bile and other duodenal contents into the oesophagus following proximal gastrectomy has generally been considered worse than reflux after total gastrectomy. The aim of the present study was to test this assumption given that there is limited literature regarding objective evaluation of the postoperative duodeno-oesophageal reflux. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We carried out bilirubin monitoring with the ambulatory spectrophotometer Bilitec 2000 in two groups of patients and in one group of healthy volunteers matched in age and sex. The proximal gastrectomy group consisted of 8 patients who underwent proximal gastrectomy and an end-to-side oesophagogastrostomy without pyloric drainage procedure. The total gastrectomy group consisted of 11 patients who underwent total gastrectomy and Roux-en-Y reconstruction with a 50-cm-long jejunal limb. The control group consisted of 8 healthy volunteers. In all cases, an absorption value of 0.14 was used as the threshold for reflux episodes. RESULTS: The median fraction of time that bilirubin absorbance was >0.14 in the proximal versus total gastrectomy group was 47.4 and 13.4%, respectively (p = 0.02). The difference between the two groups was significant in the supine position (p = 0.03), whilst the upright position, meal and postprandial periods were not found to have significant difference. Likewise, no significant difference was found in the number of reflux episodes. The median fraction of time in the proximal gastrectomy group compared with controls was 47.4 versus 3.95% (p < 0.001), whilst in the total gastrectomy group compared with controls, it was 13.4 versus 3.95% (p > 0.05). The number of reflux episodes in the proximal gastrectomy group compared with controls was 74 versus 21 (p = 0.02), whilst in the total gastrectomy group compared with controls, it was 103 versus 21 (p > 0.05). CONCLUSIONS: Total gastrectomy with Roux-en-Y reconstruction reduces the time of oesophageal exposure to duodenal juices as compared with proximal gastrectomy. This effect seems to be more prominent in the supine position.

Posterior esophagopexy with dome formation to prevent reflux in interposed jejunal pouch reconstruction after total gastrectomy.

Jejunal pouch interposition (JPI) reconstruction after total gastrectomy has proven effective for improving postoperative quality of life; however, evaluation of bile reflux into the esophagus shows that the reflux of digestive juice is not sufficiently prevented. Therefore, in addition to the conventional reconstruction technique, we created an artificial pouch to prevent the reflux of digestive juice from the jejunal pouch into the esophagus, and performed a new surgical technique based on the Hill's posterior gastropexy. No postoperative complications were observed and the postoperative measurement showed a decrease in the duration of bile reflux into the esophagus. Thus, our new surgical procedure seems to effectively prevent bile reflux.

Oesophageal and gastric bile exposure after gastroduodenal surgery with Henley's interposition or a Roux-en-Y loop.

BACKGROUND: The degree which the various reconstruction techniques prevent bile reflux after gastroduodenal surgery has been poorly studied. METHODS: Bile exposure in the intestinal tract just proximal to the jejunal loop was measured with the Bilitec 2000 device for 24 h after gastroduodenal surgery in three groups of patients. Group 1 comprised 24 patients with a 60-cm Henley's loop after total gastrectomy. Group 2 included 31 patients with a 60-cm Roux-en-Y loop after total (22 patients) or subtotal (nine) gastrectomy. Group 3 contained 21 patients with a 60-cm Roux-en-Y loop anastomosed to the proximal duodenum as part of a duodenal switch operation for pathological transpyloric duodenogastric reflux. Bile exposure, measured as the percentage time with bile absorbance greater than 0.25, was classified as nil, within the range of a control population of healthy subjects, or pathological (above the 95th percentile for the control population). Reflux symptoms were scored and all patients had upper gastrointestinal endoscopy. RESULTS: Bile was detected in the intestine proximal to the loop in none of 24 patients in group 1, eight of 31 in group 2 and 12 of 21 in group 3 (P < 0.001). The mean reflux symptom score increased with the degree of bile exposure, and the proportion of patients with oesophagitis or gastritis correlated well with the extent of bile exposure (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: A long Henley's loop was more effective in preventing bile reflux than a long Roux-en-Y loop. Bilitec data correlated well with the severity of reflux symptoms and the presence of mucosal lesions.