Prediction Equations for Calculating Maximal Inspiratory Pressure from Spirometry and Thoracic Ultrasound After COVID-19 with Gastroesophageal Reflux Disease in Indonesian Adults: A Cross-sectional Study.

BACKGROUND: This study aimed to determine the prediction equations for calculating maximal inspiratory pressure using spirometry and thoracic ultrasonography (USG) after COVID-19 with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD).  Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to December 2022 and included Indonesian adults recruited by consecutive sampling after they developed COVID-19 with GERD symptoms. The following tests were used: spirometry (forced vital capacity (FVC) and forced expiratory volume in 1 s (FEV1); thoracic USG (left diaphragm excursion (LDE) and right diaphragm excursion (RDE); and respirometry (maximal inspiratory pressure (MIP). The data were analyzed using Pearson correlational analysis and multiple linear regression. RESULTS: Sixty-two participants were recruited: mean age 37.23 ± 9.76 years and average MIP 49.85 ± 18.13 cmH2O. MIP correlated significantly with FVC (r = 0.307; p = 0.015), LDE (r = 0.249; p = 0.051), FEV1(r = 0.186; p = 0.147), and RDE (r = 0.156; p = 0.221). We developed two models based on their applicability. Model 1 provides an MIP prediction equation for health facilities that have only spirometry: 23.841 - (20.455 × FEV1) + (26.190 × FVC). Model 2 provides an MIP prediction equation for health facilities that have both spirometry and thoracic USG: 3.530 - (20.025 × FEV1) + (25.354 × FVC) + (4.819 × LDE). CONCLUSION: In this study, measures of respiratory function correlated significantly with diaphragm excursion. MIP can be predicted from spirometry and thoracic USG data. Healthcare facilities can choose the prediction equation model that best meets their situation.

[Personalized diagnosis of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease using 24-hour pH-impedance testing and high-resolution esophageal manometry].

AIM: To determine the phenotypic variants of patients with symptoms of gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), non-erosive reflux disease (NERD), hypersensitive esophagus (HSE), functional heartburn (FH) using 24-hour pH-impedance testing and high-resolution esophageal manometry (HSEM). MATERIALS AND METHODS: Fifty-five treatment-native symptomatic patients with newly diagnosed GERD and 48 control group subjects (CG) were examined. The mean age of the subjects was 45.0 years (95% confidence interval [CI] 41.0-48.9). Patients were grouped based on typical symptoms (heartburn, belching, regurgitation, odynophagy, dysphagia), medical history, endoscopy results, and 24-hour pH-impedance testing. Patients with typical symptoms of GERD and Grade B, C, D erosive esophagitis (EE) according to the Los Angeles Classification (LA) based on endoscopy were excluded from the further study. All patients without changes in the esophageal mucosa on endoscopy or with LA grade A EE (presumably NERD) underwent 24-hour pH-impedance testing and HSEM without proton pump inhibitors. Acid exposure, acid reflux count, symptom association with reflux (with symptom index and symptom association with reflux), mean nocturnal impedance, and post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index were assessed. The structure (presence or absence of a hiatal hernia) and function (presence or absence of the lower esophageal sphincter hypotonia) of the esophagogastric junction, as well as the motor function of the thoracic esophagus, were assessed using HSEM. The results of the HSEM were interpreted according to the Chicago Classification, 3rd edition (2015). RESULTS: The number of acid refluxes in patients with NERD was 71.0 (95% CI 58.4-83.7), in subjects with HSE - 38.5 (95% CI 28.3-49.0), with FH - 13.0 (95% CI 6.5-18.2), in CG - 16.5 (95% CI 9.0-21.0). The average nocturnal basal impedance was 1300 ohms (95% CI 1000-1986) in patients with NERD, 1725 ohms (95% CI 1338-2261) in patients with HSE, 2760 ohms (95% CI 2453-3499) in FH, 2515 ohms (95% CI 2283-2700) in CG. The index of post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave in patients with NERD was 61% (95% CI 57-71), with HSE - 85% (95% CI 82-88), with FH - 71% (95% CI 64-78), in CG - 66% (95% CI 63-69). Hiatal hernia and/or hypotonia of the LES were more common in patients with NERD (23%) than in CG (13.3%). Ineffective motility was detected in 34% of patients with NERD, in 23% of subject with FH and in 66.7% of patients with HSE. CONCLUSION: The results support the hypothesis that patients with GERD symptoms represent a heterogeneous population. 24-hour pH-impedance testing and HSEM helps to differentiate endoscopically negative patients with GERD symptoms and patients with Grade A EE by LA to NERD, HSE and FH.

Nocturnal Gastroesophageal Reflux and Sleep Depth in Healthy Adults, as Measured by Portable High-Resolution Manometry, Esophageal pH, and Electroencephalography.

BACKGROUND: The primary mechanism of diurnal gastroesophageal reflux (GER) is transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxation (TLESR) in both healthy persons and patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). However, few studies have examined nocturnal GER. Using portable high-resolution manometry (HRM), esophageal pH, and electroencephalography (EEG), we investigated the association of onset of nocturnal GER with sleep depth in healthy Japanese adults. METHODS: We recruited ten healthy men (mean age 33.5 ± 4.2 years) with no reflux symptoms, no history of surgery, and no current medication use. HRM and an esophageal pH catheter were inserted in the evening. The participants returned home after consuming a test meal, and EEG was placed at home before bedtime to measure sleep depth. RESULTS: The main mechanism underlying nocturnal GER was TLESR (15/17 episodes: 88.2%). The rate of TLESR with nocturnal GER during sleep was high (51.9%, 27/52 episodes). Sleep depth during TLESR was 44.2% (23/52 times) awake and 34.6% (18/52 times) shallow sleep (N1-2). Sleep depth during TLESR with nocturnal GER was 74.0% (20/27 time) awake and 18.5% (5/27 times) shallow sleep (N1-2). CONCLUSION: The primary mechanism underlying nocturnal GER was TLESR in healthy Japanese men. TLESR and TLESR with nocturnal GER were more frequent during awakenings and shallow sleep.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease in preterm infants: unmet needs.

INTRODUCTION: Many preterm present somatic symptoms including aerodigestive and cardiorespiratory manifestations, in combination with irritability and/or distress, which are often attributed to gastroesophageal reflux (GER), albeit for unclear reasons. AREAS COVERED: We searched in PubMed, Google Scholar, and MEDLINE for guidelines, reviews, and randomized controlled trials up to March 2024. EXPERT OPINION: The diagnosis of GER-disease (GERD) in preterm is challenging because manifestations are atypical and diagnostic investigations difficult and not devoid of risk for adverse events. In case of vomiting or regurgitation, GER as a consequence of anatomical or metabolic conditions should be considered. Although many preterm infants are treated with proton pump inhibitors, this is seldom needed. Low-quality evidence for alginates is available, but needs further evaluation. There is a need for an effective and safe prokinetic favoring esophageal clearance, increasing lower esophageal sphincter pressure and stimulating gastric emptying. Non-drug treatment such as feeding adaptations (volume, duration, and composition) and positional changes are insufficiently applied. Thickened formula is not indicated in preterm babies. In case none of the above recommendations did result in sufficient improvement, and if documentation of acid GER is not possible, a 2-4 week trial of a proton pump inhibitor is acceptable.

[Gastroesophageal reflux disease in 2024]. / Maladie de reflux ­gastro-­Å“sophagien en 2024.

Gastroesophageal reflux disease is the most frequent gastroente-rological diagnosis, with a high prevalence of symptoms impacting patients' quality of life and causing high economic costs. It has a -complex pathophysiology that encompasses different mechanisms and an overlap with functional disorders that cause similar symptoms. Hence, an accurate diagnosis and phenotyping of patients is crucial to individualize therapy and limit health costs. Nowadays, therapy is personalized and encompasses lifestyle interventions, proton pump inhibitors, surgery, neuromodulation, diaphragmatic breathing as well as, in the future, new drugs and endoscopic interventions.

La maladie de reflux gastro-œsophagien est le diagnostic le plus fréquent en gastroentérologie, avec une prévalence élevée des symptômes, impactant la qualité de vie des patients et engendrant des coûts sanitaires élevés. Sa physiopathologie est complexe et englobe plusieurs mécanismes, ainsi un chevauchement est ­possible avec des troubles fonctionnels pouvant se présenter avec des symptômes similaires. D'où l'importance d'un diagnostic précis et d'une prise en charge individualisée incluant, entre autres, les mesures hygiénodiététiques, les inhibiteurs de la pompe à protons, la chirurgie, la neuromodulation, la respiration diaphragmatique ainsi que, dans le futur, de nouvelles thérapies médicamenteuses et endoscopiques.

Regurgitation, eructation, and supragastric belch: retrograde esophageal motility, disorders, and treatment.

PURPOSE OF REVIEW: This review describes pathologic conditions of retrograde flow into the esophagus along with recent therapeutic advances and treatment options. RECENT FINDINGS: The esophagus facilitates anterograde and retrograde movement of contents, the latter of which is mediated by transient lower esophageal sphincter relaxations (TLESRs). Gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) often includes esophageal-specific symptoms such as heartburn or regurgitation. Volume regurgitation responds less frequently to acid suppression with proton pump inhibitors (PPIs) than heartburn, given its relationship with incompetence of the esophagogastric junction (EGJ) and increased frequency of TLESRs. Therefore, although the refluxate pH can be altered with PPIs, the frequency of reflux episodes is generally not reduced and surgical and endoscopic treatments may be favored. Other instances of abnormal retrograde esophageal flow respond better to medical therapy, or lifestyle interventions. Compared to gastric belching because of increased stomach distension, supragastric belching is caused by intake of air from pharynx into the esophagus followed by rapid expulsion of air. These conditions can be distinguished on esophageal tests such as high-resolution manometry and are likely to respond to behavioral modifications. SUMMARY: Retrograde flow into the esophagus can be a normal occurrence, but diagnostic testing to distinguish causes can guide appropriate intervention.

The foregut in cystic fibrosis.

The aerodigestive organs share a kindred embryologic origin that allows for a more complete explanation as to how the foregut can remain a barrier to normalcy in people with cystic fibrosis (pwCF). The structures of the aerodigestive tract include the nasopharynx, the oropharynx, the hypopharynx, the esophagus, the stomach, as well as the supraglottic, glottic, and subglottic tubular airways (including the trachea). Additional gastrointestinal (GI) luminal/alimentary organs of the foregut include the duodenum. Extraluminal foregut structures include the liver, the gall bladder, the biliary tree, and the pancreas. There are a variety of neurologic controls within these complicated anatomic compartments to separate the transit of food and liquid from air. These structures share the same origin from the primitive foregut/mesenchyme. The vagus nerve is a critical structure that unites respiratory and digestive functions. This article comments on the interconnected nature of cystic fibrosis and the GI tract. As it relates to the foregut, this has been typically treated as simple "reflux" as the cause of worsened lung function in pwCF. That terms like gastroesophageal reflux (GER), gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), heartburn, and regurgitation are used interchangeably to reflect pathology further complicates matters; we offer a more physiologically accurate term called "GI-related aspiration" or "GRASP." Broadly, this term reflects that aspiration of foregut contents from the duodenum through the stomach to the esophagus, into the pharynx and the respiratory tree in pwCF. As a barrier to normalcy in pwCF, GRASP is fundamentally two disease processes-GERD and gastroparesis-that likely contribute most to the deterioration of lung disease in pwCF. In the modulator era, successful GRASP management will be critical, particularly in those post-lung transplantation (LTx), only through successful management of both GERD and gastroparesis. Standardization of clinical management algorithms for GRASP in CF-related GRASP is a key clinical and research gap preventing normalcy in pwCF; what exists nearly exclusively addresses surgical evaluations or offers guidance for the management of GI symptoms alone (with unclear parameters for respiratory disease considerations). We begin first by describing the result of GRASP damage to the lung in various stages of lung disease. This is followed by a discussion of the mechanisms by which the digestive tract can injure the lungs. We summarize what we anticipate future research directions will be to reduce the impact of GRASP as a barrier to normalcy in pwCF.

Incorporating body mass index into esophageal manometry metrics and mean nocturnal baseline impedance for the evaluation of gastro-esophageal reflux disease.

This study aims to enhance the effectiveness of high resolution manometry (HRM) and pH-impedance monitoring metrics in distinguishing between gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) and non-GERD. A retrospective propensity score matching (PSM) study was conducted on 643 patients with GERD symptoms. PSM matched 134 GERD patients with 134 non-GERD controls. Body mass index (BMI), intra-esophageal pressure (IEP) and intra-gastric pressure (IGP) were significantly higher in the GERD group compared to the non-GERD group. BMI was correlated with IEP and IGP positively. IGP was positively correlated with esophagogastric (EGJ) pressure (EGJ-P) in participants with EGJ type 1 and 2, but not in participants with EGJ type 3. BMI was correlated with distal MNBI negatively. Logistic regression showed BMI as an independent risk factor for GERD. Receiver operating characteristic curve (ROC) and decision curve analysis (DCA) showed that BMI adjusted EGJ contractile integral (EGJ-CI) and BMI adjusted MNBI were superior to the corresponding original ones in predicting GERD susceptibility. According to the findings, BMI and IGP are the main factors contributing to the development of GERD. BMI affects IEP through the adaptive response of EGJ-P to IGP. Incorporating BMI into the calculations of EGJ-CI and MNBI can improve their ability in predicting GERD susceptibility.

Mean nocturnal baseline impedance in gastro-esophageal reflux disease diagnosis: Should we strictly follow the Lyon 2 Consensus?

Clinical practice guidelines drive clinical practice and clinicians rely to them when trying to answer their most common questions. One of the most important position papers in the field of gastro-esophageal reflux disease (GERD) is the one produced by the Lyon Consensus. Recently an updated second version has been released. Mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) was proposed by the first Consensus to act as supportive evidence for GERD diagnosis. Originally a cut-off of 2292 Ohms was proposed, a value revised in the second edition. The updated Consensus recommended that an MNBI < 1500 Ohms strongly suggests GERD while a value > 2500 Ohms can be used to refute GERD. The proposed cut-offs move in the correct direction by diminishing the original cut-off, nevertheless they arise from a study of normal subjects where cut-offs were provided by measuring the mean value ± 2SD and not in symptomatic patients. However, data exist that even symptomatic patients with inconclusive disease or reflux hypersensitivity (RH) show lower MNBI values in comparison to normal subjects or patients with functional heartburn (FH). Moreover, according to the data, MNBI, even among symptomatic patients, is affected by age and body mass index. Also, various studies have proposed different cut-offs by using receiver operating characteristic curve analysis even lower than the one proposed. Finally, no information is given for patients submitted to on-proton pump inhibitors pH-impedance studies even if new and extremely important data now exist. Therefore, even if MNBI is an extremely important tool when trying to approach patients with reflux symptoms and could distinguish conclusive GERD from RH or FH, its values should be interpreted with caution.

24 h combined esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH monitoring in children with chronic cough.

BACKGROUND: Chronic cough in children is closely related to gastroesophageal reflux (GER). However, this association has not been adequately studied due to a lack of diagnostic tools. Combined esophageal multichannel intraluminal impedance and pH (MII-pH) monitoring is considered the most accurate method for evaluating the association between symptoms and reflux, but data on its use in children with chronic cough are still lacking. We aimed to assess the association between chronic cough and GER in children through MII-pH monitoring. METHODS: Children with chronic cough (> 4 weeks) who were suspected gastroesophageal reflux disease(GERD) were selected to undergo 24 h MII-pH monitoring at our hospital. Patients were divided into groups according to their age, body position, reflux index (RI) or total reflux events, and the differences between the groups were analyzed. Then the significance and value of 24 h pH and impedance monitoring in chronic cough and the relationship between chronic cough and reflux were discussed. RESULTS: Overall, 426 patients were included. The median age was 12 months (interquartile range: 6-39.5 months), 129 (30.3%) patients had RI > 7% detected by pH-metry, and 290 (68.1%) patients had positive diagnosis based on the impedance data. GER predominantly occurred in the upright position and mostly involved weakly acidic reflux and mixed gas-liquid reflux. There were 14.1% of children in non-acid GER group were SAP positive showing no difference in acid GER group 13.2% (P = 0.88), whereas patients with SAP > 95% in MII positive group (47[16.2%]) is higher than in MII negative group (P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Twenty four hour MII-pH monitoring is safe, well tolerated in children, but also has a higher detection rate of gastroesophageal reflux. It can find identify weakly acidic reflux, weakly alkaline reflux and reflux events with different physical properties, which can explain the relationship between GER and chronic cough more comprehensively. It provides new approach for exploring the etiology, diagnosis and treatment of children with chronic cough.

The impact of gastroesophageal reflux disease on upper esophageal sphincter function: Insights from PH impedance and high-resolution manometry.

Lower esophageal sphincter (LES) pathophysiology has been established in gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD); however, less is understood regarding the role the upper esophageal sphincter (UES) plays in preventing laryngopharynphageal reflux. Sustained UES basal pressure prevents reflux into the pharynx while allowing relaxation during ingestion. We investigate whether GERD influences UES function via HRM and pH Impedance testing. A retrospective analysis of 318 patients who underwent high-resolution manometry with trans-nasally placed manometric catheter and 24-h multichannel intraluminal impedance pH monitoring. One hundred and forty-seven patients met Lyon consensus criteria for GERD based on acid exposure time >6%. The most common chief concern was heartburn or reflux, present in 59% of these patients. Upper esophageal sphincter basal and residual pressures were not significantly different between patients with GERD when compared to those without GERD, including a subanalysis of patients with extraesophageal symptoms. The LES basal and residual pressures, DCI and MNBI are statistically lower in patients with pathologic GERD. HRM and pH Impedance testing demonstrates no difference in UES basal and residual pressures based on pH diagnosis of GERD. We redemonstrate the association with hypotonic LES, diminished DCI and MNBI with GERD.

Diagnostic Utility of High-resolution Esophageal Manometry and Its Correlation with Symptoms.

BACKGROUND: Primary esophageal motility disorders present with a spectrum of symptoms where manometry plays an important role. We designed this study to evaluate the utility of esophageal manometry among various symptoms. MATERIALS AND METHODS: This is a single-center observational study conducted over 5 years in a tertiary referral center. A total of 564 patients who underwent high-resolution esophageal manometry (HREM) using a 16-channel water perfusion system were included in the study. Their clinical profile and manometric findings, as per the Chicago classification version 4.0, were recorded, and the diagnostic utility of HREM with respect to symptoms was studied. RESULTS: Motility disorders were identified in 48.8% of patients, the most common being Achalasia cardia (32.4%). Dysphagia (55.5%) was the most common indication of manometry, followed by gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) (34.9%), chest pain (6.2%), and symptoms such as belching, globus, and hiccoughs (3.4%). Among those who were re-classified from Chicago classification v3.0 to v4.0, 21.2% had a newer diagnosis. Among the patients with dysphagia, HREM revealed the highest yield of detecting an abnormal esophageal motility test (70.6%); meanwhile, this yield was much lower in those with GERD (21.8%), chest pain (22.8%), and other symptoms (15.7%). The most common finding among those with dysphagia was Achalasia cardia (55.9%), while the study was normal among those with GERD (78.1%), chest pain (77.1%), and other symptoms (84.2%). The sensitivity and specificity of dysphagia for major motility disorders were 65% and 91%, respectively, with a positive predictive value of 90%. CONCLUSION: HREM has high accuracy and a good diagnostic yield among patients with dysphagia, with the most common finding being Achalasia cardia.

Résumé Contexte:Les troubles primaires de la motilité œsophagienne se manifestent par un spectre de symptômes dans lesquels la manométrie joue un rôle important. Nous conçu cette étude pour évaluer l'utilité de la manométrie œsophagienne parmi divers symptômes.Matériels et méthodes:Il s'agit d'un centre unique étude observationnelle menée sur 5 ans dans un centre de référence tertiaire. Au total, 564 patients ayant subi une chirurgie œsophagienne à haute resolution la manométrie (HREM) utilisant un système de perfusion d'eau à 16 canaux ont été incluses dans l'étude. Leur profil clinique et leurs résultats manométriques, selon la classification de Chicago version 4.0, ont été enregistrés et l'utilité diagnostique du HREM en ce qui concerne les symptômes a été étudiée.Résultats:Des troubles de la motilité ont été identifiés chez 48,8 % des patients, la plus fréquente étant l'Achalasia cardia (32,4 %). La dysphagie (55,5 %) était la l'indication la plus courante de la manométrie, suivie du reflux gastro-œsophagien (RGO) (34,9 %), des douleurs thoraciques (6,2 %) et des symptômes tels que comme les éructations, les globus et le hoquet (3,4 %). Parmi ceux qui ont été reclassés de la classification de Chicago v3.0 à v4.0, 21,2 % avaient un diagnostic. Parmi les patients atteints de dysphagie, l'HREM a révélé le rendement le plus élevé de détection d'un test de motilité œsophagienne anormale (70,6 %); dans le même temps, ce rendement était beaucoup plus faible chez les personnes souffrant de RGO (21,8 %), de douleurs thoraciques (22,8 %) et d'autres symptômes (15,7 %). Le plus courant le résultat parmi les personnes souffrant de dysphagie était l'achalasie cardiaque (55,9 %), tandis que l'étude était normale chez les personnes souffrant de RGO (78,1 %), douleur thoracique (77,1 %) et autres symptômes (84,2 %). La sensibilité et la spécificité de la dysphagie pour les troubles majeurs de la motilité étaient de 65 % et 91 %, respectivement, avec une valeur prédictive positive de 90 %.Conclusion:HREM présente une grande précision et un bon rendement diagnostique chez les patients atteints de dysphagie, la pathologie la plus fréquente étant l'achalasie cardiaque.

POEM in the esophagus - How to deal with the post-POEM reflux.

Reflux after peroral endoscopic myotomy (POEM) is arguably one of the greatest concerns related to the procedure. The exact incidence is difficult to establish as reflux symptoms, esophagitis, and abnormal acid exposure correlate poorly, warranting thorough diagnostic investigation. The incidence is, however, higher than after Heller myotomy or pneumatic dilatation across all these three parameters. Although PPI are effective in the resolution of symptoms and healing of esophagitis, refractory patients exist. Esophageal hypersensitivity and acidic fermentation/esophageal stasis are most likely causes and could be diagnosed by manual analysis of pH metry tracings. Long-term complications like peptic stricture and Barrett's esophagus are rare and reported sporadically. Modifications of POEM procedure aiming to decrease post-POEM reflux led to no conclusive preferred technique. Modern investigations like endoluminal functional lumen imaging probe might help to personalize myotomy to the desired distensibility of the lower esophageal sphincter and decrease reflux.

Value of endoscopic grading of gastroesophageal flap valve in gastroesophageal reflux disease.

OBJECTIVE: To investigate the significance of endoscopic grading (Hill's classification) of gastroesophageal flap valve (GEFV) in the examination of patients with gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD). METHODS: One hundred and sixty-two patients undergoing gastroscopy in the Department of Gastroenterology, Xingyi People's Hospital between Apr. 2022 and Sept. 2022 were selected by convenient sampling, and data such as GEFV grade, and findings of esophageal high-resolution manometry (HRM) and esophageal 24-h pH/impedance reflux monitoring, and Los Angeles (LA) classification of reflux esophagitis (RE) were collected and compared. RESULTS: Statistically significant differences in age (F = 9.711, P < 0.001) and hiatal hernia (χ = 35.729, P < 0.001) were observed in patients with different GEFV grades. The resting LES pressures were 12.12 ± 2.79, 10.73 ± 2.68, 9.70 ± 2.29, and 8.20 ± 2.77 mmHg (F = 4.571, P < 0.001) and LES lengths were 3.30 ± 0.70, 3.16 ± 0.68, 2.35 ± 0.83, and 2.45 ± 0.62 (F = 3.789, P = 0.011), respectively, in patients with GEFV grades I-IV. DeMeester score (Z = 5.452, P < 0.001), AET4 (Z = 5.614, P < 0.001), acid reflux score (upright) (Z = 7.452, P < 0.001), weak acid reflux score (upright) (Z = 3.121, P = 0.038), liquid reflux score (upright) (Z = 3.321, P = 0.031), acid reflux score (supine) (Z = 6.462, P < 0.001), mixed reflux score (supine) (Z = 3.324, P = 0.031), gas reflux score (supine) (Z = 3.521, P = 0.024) were different in patients with different GEFV grades, with statistically significant differences. Pearson correlation analysis revealed a positive correlation between RE grade and LA classification of GERD (r = 0.662, P < 0.001), and the severity of RE increased gradually with the increase of the Hill grades of GEFV. CONCLUSION: The Hill grade of GEFV is related to age, hiatal hernia, LES pressure, and the consequent development and severity of acid reflux and RE. Evaluation of esophageal motility and reflux based on the Hill grade of GEFV is of significance for the diagnosis and treatment of GERD.

Comparative evaluation of single versus double leg raise maneuver in high-resolution esophageal manometry.

BACKGROUND: The straight leg raise (SLR) maneuver, often performed during esophageal manometry, requires patients to lift their leg(s) to augment intraabdominal pressure (IAP). Diverse techniques have been applied for SLR. This study aimed to evaluate and compare the effects of SLR between single and double leg raises. METHODS: During esophageal manometry, patients were asked to raise one leg, followed by elevating both legs. The efficacy of SLR for (1) detecting hiatal hernia, (2) increasing IAP, and (3) predicting gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD) with intraesophageal pressure (IEP) was assessed. The value of change in impedance to indicate reflux during SLR in predicting esophageal acid exposure was investigated. KEY RESULTS: The leg raise procedures were performed in 86 patients undergoing high-resolution esophageal manometry. Both the single and double leg raises exhibited a higher hiatal hernia detection rate compared to the landmark (p = 0.008 and 0.005, respectively). Double leg raise was more effective in raising IAP by >50% compared to single leg raise (100% vs. 65.1%, p < 0.001), increasing yield by 53.6%. The change in IAP showed a positive correlation with the change in IEP during double leg raise (r = 0.31; p = 0.004), higher than that for single leg raise (r = 0.23; p = 0.03). Lower intraesophageal impedance during SLR was associated with AET > 6% with double leg raise (1.5 kΩ vs. 2.5 kΩ, p = 0.04). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: Our study demonstrates the efficacy of both single and double leg raise maneuvers during HREMI in increasing hiatal hernia detection and possible value in predicting GERD. The double leg raise resulted in a higher rate of effective increase in IAP, potentially enabling more patients to undergo effective SLR during HREMI.

Review article: Oesophageal disorders in chronic liver disease.

BACKGROUND: Oesophageal disorders and chronic liver disease are common worldwide and significantly impact quality of life. The intricate link between these conditions, including how oesophageal disorders like GERD, Barrett's oesophagus and oesophageal cancer affect and are affected by chronic liver disease, remains poorly understood. AIMS: To review the relationship between oesophageal disorders and chronic liver disease, evaluating epidemiology, pathophysiology and therapeutic factors. METHODS: We reviewed the literature on the relationship between oesophageal disorders and chronic liver disease, including cirrhosis, using the PubMed database RESULTS: Oesophageal disorders such as gastroesophageal reflux disease, Barrett's oesophagus, oesophageal cancer, oesophageal motor disorders and oesophageal candidiasis are prevalent among individuals with cirrhosis, exacerbating the burden of liver disease. These diseases have a multifaceted symptomatology and pathogenic basis, posing a significant challenge in cirrhotic patients that necessitates careful diagnosis and management. Additionally, therapies frequently used for these diseases, such as proton pump inhibitors, require careful consideration in cirrhotic patients due to potential adverse effects and altered pharmacokinetics. Managing oesophageal disorders in cirrhotic patients requires a cautious approach due to possible interactions with medications and the risk of adverse effects. Furthermore, symptoms associated with these conditions are often exacerbated by common interventions in patients with cirrhosis, such as band ligation for oesophageal varices. CONCLUSIONS: Oesophageal disorders are common in cirrhosis and increase the disease burden. These conditions require careful management due to complex symptoms and treatment risks. Proton pump inhibitors and other therapies must be used cautiously, as cirrhosis interventions can worsen symptoms.

Automated software-derived supine baseline impedance is highly correlated with manual nocturnal baseline impedance for the diagnosis of GERD.

BACKGROUND: Mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) can improve diagnostic accuracy for gastroesophageal reflux disease (GERD), but must be manually calculated and is not routinely reported. We aimed to determine how automated software-derived mean supine baseline impedance (MSBI), a potential novel GERD metric, is related to MNBI. METHODS: Consecutively obtained pH-impedance studies were assessed. Manually extracted MNBI was compared to MSBI using paired t-test and Spearman's correlations. KEY RESULTS: The correlation between MNBI and MSBI was very high (ρ = 0.966, p < 0.01). CONCLUSIONS & INFERENCES: The ease of acquisition and correlation with MNBI warrant the routine clinical use and reporting of MSBI with pH-impedance studies.

How to diagnose GERC more effectively: reflections on post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index and mean nocturnal baseline impedance.

INTRODUCTION: Post-reflux swallow-induced peristaltic wave index (PSPWI) and mean nocturnal baseline impedance (MNBI) are novel parameters reflect esophageal clearance capacity and mucosal integrity. They hold potential in aiding the recognition of gastroesophageal reflux-induced chronic cough (GERC). Our study aims to investigate their diagnostic value in GERC. METHODS: This study included patients suspected GERC. General information and relevant laboratory examinations were collected, and final diagnosis were determined following guidelines for chronic cough. The parameters of multichannel intraluminal impedance-pH monitoring (MII-pH) in patients were analyzed and compared to explore their diagnostic value in GERC. RESULTS: A total of 186 patients were enrolled in this study. The diagnostic value of PSPWI for GERC was significant, with the area under the working curve (AUC) of 0.757 and a cutoff value of 39.4%, which was not statistically different from that of acid exposure time (AET) (p > 0.05). The combined diagnostic value of AET > 4.4% and PSPWI < 39.4% was superior to using AET > 4.4% alone (p < 0.05). Additionally, MNBI and distal MNBI also contributed to the diagnosis of GERC, with AUC values of 0.639 and 0.624, respectively. AET > 4.4% or PSPWI < 39.4% is associated with a 44% reduction in missed diagnoses of non-acid GERC compared to AET > 6.0% or symptom association probability (SAP) ≥ 95%, and may be more favorable for identifying GERC. CONCLUSION: The diagnostic value of PSPWI for GERC is comparable to that of AET. Combining PSPWI < 39.4% or AET > 4.4% can improve the diagnostic efficiency by reducing the risk of missed diagnoses in cases where non-acid reflux is predominant. Distal MNBI and MNBI can serve as secondary reference indices in the diagnosis of GERC.

The impact of smoking on bronchiectasis and its comorbidities.

INTRODUCTION: Bronchiectasis, characterized by irreversible bronchial dilatation, is a growing global health concern with significant morbidity. This review delves into the intricate relationship between smoking and bronchiectasis, examining its epidemiology, pathophysiology, clinical manifestations, and therapeutic approaches. Our comprehensive literature search on PubMed utilized MESH terms including 'smoking,' 'smoking cessation,' 'bronchiectasis,' and 'comorbidities' to gather relevant studies. AREAS COVERED: This review emphasizes the role of smoking in bronchiectasis development and exacerbation by compromising airways and immune function. Interconnected comorbidities, including chronic obstructive pulmonary disease, asthma, and gastroesophageal reflux disease, create a detrimental cycle affecting patient outcomes. Despite limited studies on smoking cessation in bronchiectasis, the review stresses its importance. Advocating for tailored cessation programs, interventions like drainage, bronchodilators, and targeted antibiotics are crucial to disrupting the inflammatory-infection-widening cycle. EXPERT OPINION: The importance of smoking cessation in bronchiectasis management is paramount due to its extensive negative impact on related conditions. Proactive cessation programs utilizing technology and targeted education for high-risk groups aim to reduce smoking's impact on disease progression and related comorbidities. In conclusion, a personalized approach centered on smoking cessation is deemed vital for bronchiectasis, aiming to improve outcomes and enhance patients' quality of life in the face of this complex respiratory condition.

A practical approach to ineffective esophageal motility.

BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE: Ineffective esophageal motility (IEM) is the most frequently diagnosed esophageal motility abnormality and characterized by diminished esophageal peristaltic vigor and frequent weak, absent, and/or fragmented peristalsis on high-resolution esophageal manometry. Despite its commonplace occurrence, this condition can often provoke uncertainty for both patients and clinicians. Although the diagnostic criteria used to define this condition has generally become more stringent over time, it is unclear whether the updated criteria result in a more precise clinical diagnosis. While IEM is often implicated with symptoms of dysphagia and gastroesophageal reflux disease, the strength of these associations remains unclear. In this review, we share a practical approach to IEM highlighting its definition and evolution over time, commonly associated clinical symptoms, and important management and treatment considerations. We also share the significance of this condition in patients undergoing evaluation for anti-reflux surgery and consideration for lung transplantation.